ML20037D333

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Supplemental Responses to Intervenor Second Set of Interrogatories.Info Re Class Use of Facility & Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20037D333
Person / Time
Site: 05000142
Issue date: 06/29/1981
From: Woods G
CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, LOS ANGELES, CA
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8107100016
Download: ML20037D333 (19)


Text

  • ,

1 2

3 4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGU;ATORY COMMISSION 5

/

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSIIG@OARD

/ oy g S

fl.

J.

7

.~/

JJ JUL 0 91981 * -

77l 8

\\y; u.s.,

,,,mmn

\\9

,Q)s 9

In the Matter of

)

sr,

c (Proposed Rdn6Lajlp,0,-@Pacility

)

Docket,No. 5 2

10 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY 1

OF CALIFORNIA

)

License Number 4-71) 11

)

(UCLA Research Reactor)

)

June 29, 1981 12

)

13 14 15 APPLICANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO INTERVENOR'S SFCOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES 16 17 18 DONALD L.

REIDHAAR GLENN R.

WOODS 19 CflRISTINE HELWICK WN 590 University Hall p

\\

20 2200 University Avenue

'S Berkeley, California 94720 21

//

COC'.[3 Telephone:

(415) 642-2822 1

\\

22 g5 jyy b

~

7 Attorneys for Applicant

$[1f '

23 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY 6

L.... -

y OI' CALIFORNIA

\\

24

,/

k _-i 25 i

26 27 28 6

0

[f &,t 8107100016 010629 PDR ADOCK 05000142 f

G PDR

,1

1 Applicant, THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 2

submits the following responses as a supplement to Applicant's 3

" Answers to Inter renor's Second Set of Interrogatories," dated 4

May 20, 1981.

5 6

I.

SUPPLEMENTED RESPONSES 7

8 Supplemented Response to In'crrogatory No. 17d through c

9 (Contention I).

9 10 The information requested is contained in the report 11

" Class Use of the UCLA Reactor" which is appended to these 12 Supplemented Responses as " Exhibit A."

13 14 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 35 (Con-15 tention II).

16 See the supplemented response above.

17 18 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 29 (Con-19 tention II).

20 See the supplemented response above.

21 22 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 42 (Con-23 tention II).

24 Actual run time was 381 hours0.00441 days <br />0.106 hours <br />6.299603e-4 weeks <br />1.449705e-4 months <br />.

25 26 I Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 46 (Con-27 tention II).

28 See " Exhibit C" attached to " Applicant's Further

1 Answers to Intervenor," dated June 11, 1981.

2 3

Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 20 (Con-4 tention III).

5 The definition is given in item 1.16 of the proposed 6

technical specifications.

7 8

Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 43d (Con-9 tention III).

10 The procedures are available in the control room.

11 Emcrgency procedures are posted in the control room and many 12 other places within the facility.

13 14 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 9a (Con-15 tention IV).

16 Applicant did not consider the " failures or malfunctions" 17 as reportable occurrences.

18 19 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 20 (Con-20 tention IV).

21 Not to Applicant's knowledge.

22 23 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 8c (Con-24 tention VI_).

25 The data and its interpretation were discussed in the 26 1978 Annual Report to the Commission.

27 28 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. lla (Con-tention VI).

I._

i

W 1

The " validity" and " accuracy" relate to the instrument.

2 The instrument was correctly recording data.

-However, it was not 3

the data that was expected, since Applicant had not anticipated 4 j that the readings would be af fected by the concrete.

The 5

accuracy question was discussed in a report to the Commicsion 6,

titled "The UCLA Reactor is Safe."

Applicant has no doubts about 7

the validity and accuracy of its TLD data.

8 9

Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 25a (Con-10 tention VI).

11 The location was 4150 center Street, Culver City, 12 California.

13 14 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 36c (Con-15 tention VI).

16 The Application for Amendment 10 chose utilization of 17 the conference room as occupancy limiting.

In-transit and 18 clevator waiting periods were assumed to yeild occupancy of 19 five months for each hour of conference room utilization (25 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> per week), or less than 5 percent of the 45 hour5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> work week.

21 (See Safety Analysis of Amendment 10, May 16, 1975.)

22 23 Suppleme..ted Respvase to Interrogatory No. 40 (Con-

)'4 tention VI).

20, a.

Penetration of concrete walls and floors was l

26 '

neglected.

This was a simplifying assumption based upon the high 27 attenuation of gamma-rays in concrete and the opinion that a 28 sabstantial transport of radiation would require cblique rays of long path length. -

e 1

b.

The shielding effect of partitions was assumed to 2

be zero.

3 c.

Because it was assumed to be negligible.

4 5

Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 41b (Con-6 tention VI).

7 Occupancy can reach 100% only if the same individual 8

or group occupies the area continuously for all hours that the 9

reactor might operate.

The occupancy factor assumed is the largest 10 one for any specific individual or group exposed; it is not the 11 summation of the occupancy factors of all groups exposed.

If 12 another particular group or individual is determined to occupy 13 th'e area a greater amount of the relevant time period then that 14 group or individual's occupancy is used to calculate a new 15 occupancy factor.

16 17 Supplemented Response to interrogatory No. 47a (Con-18 tention VI).

19 Relevant information requested can be found on the same 20 page of the same document cited in the interrogatory.

As ex-21 plained there the distance "r"

from the plume center line to 22 location "G" is stated to be 8.59 meters.

23 24 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 9c (Con-25 tention VII).

26 Applicant schedules monthly meetings to discuss 27 operating procedures.

28 -

cs

1 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. 7d (Con-2 2

tention VIII).

3 The fission products identified in the application, 4

page III/B-3, are iodine, bromine and krypton isotopes.

The 5

longest lived fission product of each of these species which 6

might reasonably qualify as "a short-lived isotope" is" 7

I-131 -- 8. 04 days 8

Br-83 -- 2.40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> 9

Kr-85m -- 4.48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> 10 The response to Interrogatory No. Sa (Contention VIII) is 11 applicable.

Seven half-lives of I-131 is 56 days.

12 13 Supplemented Response to Interrogatory No. J8 (Con-14 tention VIII).

15 If the question pertains generally to a core inventory 16 "that can be contained," Applicant submits that all fission 17 products can be contained up to, and well beyond, the burn-up 18 of available excess reactivity.

If the question pertains generally 19 to a core inventory that may actually exist, then the most 20 relevant information is contained in NUREG/CR-2079

(" Analysis of 21 Credible Accidents for Argonant Reactors").

That report contains 22 a table listing some of the isotopes specified in the question.

23 The table describes the volatile constituents in one fuel 24 e2ement following continuous operation at 100' kw for one year.

25 26 II.

CONCLUSION 27 28 Applicant is continuing to derive information to '

e w-w

1 { respond to certain other questions of Intervenor's Second Set 2

of Interrogatories and will supplement its responsen further as 3

soon as it has obtained the information.

4 5

Dated:

June 29, 1981 6

7 DONALD L.

REIDHAAR GLENN R.

WOODS 9

CHRISTINE HELWICK 9

^

10 By h

Glenn R.

Woods 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 l

28 ll

m.. v DGIIBIT R UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES Class Use of the UCLA Reactor by C. E. Ashbaugh Jtme 29,1981 I

G --

1 University of California, Los Angeles Class Use Of The UCLA P.eactor A.

CNTE Engineering Courses:

1.

Engineering 135AL-Nuclear Analysis Laboratory I, 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, Fall Quarter. 2 units Enrollment 4 to 12 students Instructor: Mr. Charles Ashbaugh Descr i ptio_n_:

A laboratory course in nuclear engineering comprised of various experiments in reactor core physics and related fields.

Four of the principal experiments use the reactor and measure fundamental properties i.e. reactor operations,thermsl diffusion length in graphite, subcritical neutron multiplication via approach to critical and control rod calibra-tions.

The laboratory course includes lectures, reactor time, and stu.! it use of analytical counting instruments. Also, included are non-rea<, tor nuclear experiments.

Time Distribution Hours / Class Lectures and non-reactor experiments 29 Reactor Hours 9-Instrumentation hours due to Reactor use.

2 Total 40 4

1 i

u 2.

Engineering 135BL-Nuclear Analysis La boratory II, 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, Winter Quarter-2 units Enrollment 4 to 12 students Instructor: Mr. Charles Ashbaugh

==

Description:==

A continuation of Engineering 135AL in which five of the experiments require use of the reactor. These experiments include the following:

thermal neutron flux profile of the center vertical irradiation port via gold foils, thermal flux profile by step perturbation, reactor kinetics, temperature coefficients and flux tilt, and INAA (gamma ray spectrometry).

Time Distribut'on~~~

Hours / Class Lectures and non-reactor experiments 27 Reactor hours 9

Instrumentation hours due to reactor use 4

Total 40 i

l l

l l

2

3.

Engineering 135F Experimental Reactor Operations, Control and Safety 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, Spring Quarter-2 units Enrollment 4 to 6 students Instructor: Mr. Charles E. Ashbaugh

==

Description:==

A laboratory course concentrating on the operation of the UCLA reactor.

Experiments performed on the reactor are those which are not performed in Engineering 139A, Engineering 135AL or Engineering 135BL. The experiments cover measurements of various core parameters, control system responses and the evaluation of various safety systems.

Certain qualified students will take the NRC reactor operator liscensing exam several weeks after class completion and after a minimum of 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> at the reactor console.

Approximately half of the reactor time per student is outside of the formal class hours.

Time Distribution Hours /C; ass Lectures and Discussions 40 Reactor Operations

>40/ student Total

>80 3

m

4 Engineering 139A-Introductory Chemical Nuclear and Thermal Engineering Laboratory 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, Fall, Winter, Spring Quarter 4 units Enrollment 25 students Instructors:CNTE Faculty.

- A required laboratory course involving each of the three disciplines in the Department of CNTE.

Each student is required to perform eight one week experiments. The two nuclear experiments are radiation and calibration of counting equipment and neutron activation analysis and identification of unknowns. The students perform their own irradiation under supervision of an SR0 with the class divided up into fcur sections with each section spending two weeks at NEL, Time Distribution Hours / Class Lectures pertaining to nuclear experiments:

4x3=12 Reactor hours 4xl=4 Instrumentation hours due to reactor use:

4x12=48 Total =TT 1

1 I

4

B.

Non CNTE Courses 1.

Physics 180A-Nuclear Physics Laboratory 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, Winter and Spring Quarters 4 Units Enrollment 10 students Instructors:

Dr. George Igo/Dr. Jean Oostens A laboratory course comprised of various experiments involving nuclear physics. The reactor portion of tgg'classinvolvesstudentparti-cipation in the production of F20, 537, Na

, Cdl15 and the irradiation of flints. The analysis is performed using NEL's instrumentation.

Time Distribution Hours / Class Lectures and non-reactor expcriments 66 Reactor Hours 2

Instrumentation hours due to reactor use 12 Total IRi 5

2.

Chemistry 184 - Instrumental Analysis 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, Fall and Spring Quarters 4 Units Enrollment 20 Instructors: Dr. John Wasson/Dr. Derek Sears A lecture /12boratory course covering the theory and practice of instrumental techniques such as atomic absorption spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, x-ray fluorescence and through the use of the reactor, gamma ray spectrometry for neJtron activation analysis.

Time Distribution Hours / Class l

Lectures and non-reactor experiments 98 Reactor Hours 6

Instrumentation hours due to reactor use.

16 TE6 6

3.

Chemistry 221K-Nuclear Chemistry and Neutron Activation 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, Spring Quarter 4 units Enrollment 10 Instructor: Dr. John Wasson A lecture / laboratory course covering the various disciplines of nuclear chemistry such as radioactive decay, radiochemical separations and various nuclear analysis techniques.

Use of the reactor is required to perform neutron activation analysis and subsequent gamma ray spectrometry.

Time Distribution Hours / Class lectures and non-reactor experiments 32 Reactor hours 10 Instrumentation due to reactor use '18 Total lRi 4

7 f

I 4.

Earth and Space Sciences 298-Neutron Activation Analysis 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, Spring Quarter 2 units Enrollment 5 Instructor: Dr. John Wasson/Mr. G. W. Kallemeyn A laboratory course on neutron activation analysis and gamma ray spectrometry taught in conjunction with Chemistry 221K. The students participate in their own sample handling and irradiations.

Time Distribution Hours / Class lectures and non-reactor experiments 12 Reactor use 6

Instrumentation hours due to reactor use.

22 Total 40 l

l l

l l

l

\\

8 M

W

5 University Engineering Extension 497.17-Nuclear Reactor Theory and Operations 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />, Spring Quarter 4 units Enrollment 10 Instructor: Mr. Charles Ashbaugh An engineering extension course covering the various aspects of nuclear reactor theory and operations.

The course covers reactor core physics, health physics and instrumentation and includes an experiment on the reactor.

Time Distribution Hours / Class Lectures and exams 33 Reactor Use 3

Total 1RI-9 1

(

l 1

r M+ggp s=ww* - - + --

g

C.

Course Cancelled 1.

Engineering 1393-Chemical and Thermal Engineering Laboratory 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, Spring Quarter 4 units Enrollment 25 Instructors: CNTE Faculty This course required students to perform four, two week experiments on a rotation basis. The two week neutron activation analysis and gamma r'ay spectrometry experiment was included in the course during the years 1977 through 1979 Due to instructor time conflicts, the reactor experiment was cancelled. Students wishing to learnINAA were to enroll in other courses which cover this material.

10 b

o h

  • First Offering (1980-1981)

,-)cPer Student basis when class is subdivided

(

CLASS USE OF UCLA REACTOR Instrumentation Student Instrumentatihn Offerir Studente,Studen';s Reactor Hrs Reactor Hrs. Student Reactor Hours / Class Hours / Year Per Year Class Units per qt. per yr.,

Per Quarter Per Year Hours / Year Engineeri ng 135AL 2

4-12 4-12 9

9 36-108 2

8 24 1

Engineering 135?L 2

4-12 4-12 9

9 36-108 4

16-48 1

Engineering 135F

.2 4-6 4-6;

>100

>100 200-300 N/A N/A 1

(1)

(1)

(12)

Engineering 139A 4

25 75 4

' 12 75 48 900 3

Physics 180A 4

10 20 2

4 40 12 240 2

Chem 184 4

20 40 6

12 240 16 640 2

  • Chem 221K 4

10 10 10 10 100 18 180 1

  • ESS 298 2

5 5

6 6

30 22 110 1

Engineering X 497.17 4

10 10 3

3 30 N/A N/A 1

Engineering See C-1 1393 Uni ts 172-l TOTALS offered 190

>165 787-1031 2094-2142 13 r ycar 1

L

1 U!TITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGUIA'IOPJ CliiISSION 2

BEEDRE DE Ju"GIIC SAFETY AND LICF2;SEJG DOARD 3

4 In the P.atter of

)

)

Docket No. 50-142 5

MIE REGE7IS OF 'IHE U TIVERSITY

)

(Proposed Penem l of Facility OF CALIFOP2TIA

)

License Ntn.ber R-71) 6

)

(UCIA Research Peactor)

)

7

)

8 CERi'IFIC/CE OF SER'/ ICE 9

I hereby certify that ccpies of the attached:

APPLIC7dr'S RESPONSE 'IO INTEITICDR'S MCfrION TO COII'EL AND PEQUEST EDR PFODUCIION 10 in the above-captioned proceeding have been servcd on the following by deposit 11 in the United States rail, first class, postage prepaid, addressed as in-dicated, cn this date:

citme 30, 1981 12 13 Elizabeth Bomrs, Esq.

Counsel for NBC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccnmission Office of the Executive Ingal Director 14 Atcmic Safety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Pegulatory Ccrmissicn Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 Dr. ErTrth A. Luebke Daniel Hirsch 16 U.S. Nuclear Pegulatory Ccmission Ccnmittee to Bridge the Gap Ataric Safety & Licensing Board 1637 Butler Avenue, #230 17 Washington, DC 20555 Los Angeles, CA 90025 18 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Mr. Park Pollock U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccrn* ; 'n Pollack & Nillis 19 Atcrcic Safety & Licensing Boa J 1724 N. La Drea Avenue Washington, DC 20555 Ios Angeles, CA 90046 Chief, Docketing and Service Section (3) 21 office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Pegulatory Ccnrcission 22 Washington, DC 20555 23 l

24 c:

25 William H.

Cormier i

UCLA Representhtive 26 27 28

.