ML20037B595

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 760525 & 26 Site Visit to Obtain Facility Corrosion Test Loop Decontamination & Data for Source Term Development for Future Licensing Actions,Involving Major Decontamination Operations
ML20037B595
Person / Time
Site: Dresden 
Issue date: 07/12/1976
From: Jun Lee
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Jay Collins
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8010220713
Download: ML20037B595 (4)


Text

.

2

=ges:

j;;;s.=

E==

JUL 121976

~

g.ge sir.

Docket No.50-010

({-

John T. Collins, Chief, Effluent Treatment Systems Branch, DSE

="E THRU: Michael J. Bell, Leader, Systems Analysis Section ETSB ab1,-

=a Orig ""13tgn

.==?

i TRIP REPORT - DRESDEN NUCLEAR STATION d

On Hay 25 and 26, 1976, I visited the Dresden Nuclear Station with 7,..:

R. Clark (EEB/ DOR) to 1) observe the Dresden Unit No. I corrosion test loop decontamination, 2) obtain data for source term development for

==~

future licensing actions involving major decontamination operations, i?=

3) obtain information to be used to develop a branch position to in-
,.....d z

clude decontamination provisions during design and construction stages, j.M.,

and 4) observe the solidification process for decontamination chemical

=

wastes.

5.e The corrosion test loop being decontaminated was originally owned by 9 y:@

the AEC and operated under contract by GE to obtain data on stress

= gij corrosion.

The test loop is completely separated from the reactor coolant system E=

by physically cutting the loop from the "B" Secondary Heat Exchanger 3,g Loop of the Dresden Unit No. I primary system. The loop consists of three S.S. test vessels (diameters from 18 to 24 inches), approximately 80 feet of 4 inch S.S. 304 and 316 piping, a new S.S. 316 Chem-Pump

==!

~

with Graphitar-14 bearings, a heat exchanger, and approximately 20 gate p

and globe valves. Bimetalic weld specimens and contaminated spool

~

pieces obtained from Monticello, Quad Cities, Milletone and Dresden '

g[

Unit.No. 2 have been inserted in the loop. There ata no deadlegs in

[:

7=

!.s

.jf the]1oop and the crud in the loop is believed to be ;t-opresentative F.

(

of the rest of the Dresden Unit No. I primary system based on the iso-

.t'pic survey made by GE with a scanning GeLi detector. The background

[.

x=

o

'Jdose' rates around the decontanination area ranged from 100 to 500 rJt/hr h

-"and one hot spot had dose rates of 20 R/hr at contact with the pipe

!===

-f,/ insulation.

F

/ The loop tests were scheduled to begin with injection of the solvent \\

if I

on May 21, 1976, and the solvent was to be drained from the test b

loop on May 25,1976, after 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> of circulation through the 1

5.e c h!

/

test loop. However, due to Icaks developed through screw-connected E

l thermocouple penetrations in the pressure vessels, the licensee was l

not able to proceed with the solvent injection into the loop whilo

=

we were at Dresden.

(Subsequent to our visit, a successful hydrotest

, i b

x w

R==

. as finally completed on June 3, 1976 and the solvent was injected

/.

h@2 f

i; l

/ into the test loop on June 4,1976.)

\\

c.a The major itens of discussions with GE, Dow Chemical, and Commonwealth Gl. uu fu uu n.

'/~

h uw a er ric =

  • suem a u a >

oA7 >

..;j Torm AIC 5la (Rev. 9-55) goN 2 2 0 7 / 3 *" * "

}

/

=;

=

E J. T. Collins JUL 121976 g =r w. -...

f."".T.,.,....,..

".E...}7 ".

1.

The present buildup of radioactive crud in the Dresden Unit No.1

\\......g;;

primary system has reached the point where large man-rem exposures to operating personnel are resulting from in-service inspection and maintenance, ne licensee estimates an overall savings of 500 man-

[s -E EE rem per year in operation and maintenance personnel exposures for the projected remaining ten year operating life of Dresden Unit No.1.

El=.5 The cost of the overall full scale decontamination of the primary

[E ~~

system is estimated to be 38 million dollars, including construction of a 25 million dollar decontamination waste process building and

[.)

equipment.

(ERDA is expected to pay about 8 million dollars of this cost.)

ii=

==

Based on an overall savings of 5,000 man-rem for a. period of ten years the decontamination cost is equivalent to $7,600 per man-rea

"

saved ($2,600 per man-rem saved, if the cost of the waste process

===E equipment and building are excluded, since these can be used for j

future waste processing operations). Estimated exposure required

F

to perform the overall full scale decontamination is 250 man-rem.

2.

The activity build-up rate (shutdown radiation levels on primary coolant circulation piping) at Dresden Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Monticello, z..

=

Millstone, Nine Mile Point, and Quad Cities have been following closely the Dresden Unit No. I build-up rate (effective full power hours of operation versus radiation level).

3.

For corrective action for future BWR design, GE (Jim Holloway)

G._._

stated that they will require the maximum cobalt impurity content

!=

l be less than 0.05% in all stainless steel and higher nickel alloys l

and they will replace Stellite in control rod drive rollers with

sii!l other suitable metal. These requirements are projected to increase p

==-

the cost of alloys by about 5%.

r===

4.

Two gamma proportional counters are provided in the test loop; one.at a clean spool piece which was indicating 500 cpm background, 5

~

and the other at a contaminated pipe which was indicating 500,000 cpm.

!=

The equilibrated readouts from these two counters are intended to G

provide an instantaneous measure of decontamination effectiveness during chemical cleaning. ne utility expects a DP of approximately 1000,as a reasonably achievable value.

'besolventcontacttimeforthetestis100hoursat255Fand iiiii 0

5.

l

' fat a pH of 3.5.

Dow installed a " copper catcher" in the loop to

~~

' scavenge any copper pickup from the test loop.

I 6.

Dow Chemical claims that they have developed a proprietary solidi-

- E=

,fication reagent compatible with decontamination chemical vastos l

oenerated by their NS 1 d enntnninntinn en1vont.

The tee inap orrscE >

s e = % a w e D-ia par e p-

- ;;.;- g g,,,;;-

, q gvg c g p Tum AIC-319 (Ret 9 53) AICM 0240 W u. s. oovanNutNT PamnNG OFFICK8 IBM. Bas. tee h h

b J.@@

V U

4

=?

=..

c

'.?

==:

J. T. Collins JUL 121976

.s N:

decontamination at Dresden Unit No.1 is expected to generate approximately 1000 gallons of chemical wastes and Dow will solidify

"="""=_

1 chemical waste at Dresden with their skid-mounted solidification E= El equipment using this newly developed solidifying reagent. 'Ihe 7:j licensee will show that the system is capabic of producing a solid

~"

matrix in conformance with NRC Branch Technical Position, ETSB lio. 11-3.

Action Recomended 2 :=

1.

No should keep informed of current GE-Utility water chemistry

=-

programs, EPRI corrosion product control programs, and industry

.gg;.g3 decontamination process development.

. =c.

==

2.

We should encourage utilities and contractors to conduct feasibility z' l'[

studies of alternatives such as on-line system decontamination for

..:.=:~:

operating reactors to deternine if this type of system could reduce

~ ?.':.

liquid and solid waste volumes and occupational radiation exposures

=E.

as compared to the system proposed for use at Dresden.

Original signed by:

/

Jay Y. Lee, Senior Nuclear Engineer Effluent Treatment Systems Branch Divisioa of Site Safety and Environcental Analysis i.:......:

cc:

E. Case.

E. ~ g:;.4 B. Rusche e

i.

S. IIanauer I:g.

ic.+-: E j

II. Denton

[:)!!.._

D. Muller M

f R. Vollmer W. Bishop l

/

R. Nacos

~

R. Fraley

~j W. Converso g,f =

R. Clark i.7 r=-

l DP't A/D's I:i==

DSS A/D's -

EM-D0R A/D's 1-E=

M. Shutt1cworth 6

,/

NRC PDR Local PDR b

l B. Grines iisa s

L.

oarreLL l

. errecu *

}:.

3 l

'/

l

, / sv== Aue >

a s

c.

D Af r >

i.

form AIC 31s (Rev. 9 5 5) AZCM 0240 W u. e. novanmuunt emmtime orrics: non.sas.sse t

I

ac L.

o-Gr

, JUL 121976 tv JUL 121976 1=== ='

s L':.

V" y

t No. I IC...

~;=.

[s EpO ure3

',:n=::=.

etion and 500 man-

's

'=

r:0 f;,r

's N--

Unit N3. 1.

q

,rir.ary struction ing and 50-010 is cf this File Pile File of ten

"=4 man-rem

roc;sa d for

-ll.,af

~

quired

.. =..

n-rem.

Imary sntier11o, ving 3 p'w;r

==

.l. o 'J..

g'n.

y) nt:nt

allsys lwith
l'

&ncrcasa y

l t::.

bp; l

('::

.=r.

.tround, i

[I:;;

)0,000 cpm.

l ped to l

ren ss jximataly

=. :-

!and D**D

  • D 3'
p to s

_ cwa w

~

i:::

s:-

'olidi-jtos

'S B DSE:ETSB FU B e ll..........Q....

~

.1w

. _ i:v=.

7

~ ~ ' ' ' ~

'76 07/JR/.76.. _.

0240 W u, s. ooyERNMENT PRINTsNG OFFICEE1974-936 188 b-l l

.