ML20037B303
| ML20037B303 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 05/04/1973 |
| From: | Anthony Giambusso US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Brian Lee COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8009101007 | |
| Download: ML20037B303 (6) | |
Text
/
F '.Y 1 973
. a chet :.cc. 50-10, 50-237, cnd 50-249 Cc=::. nucalth Edison Cor.:pany ATE!: lir. Eyron Lec, Jr.
Assistant to the Presidcat Fost Office Ear 767 Chiccgo, Illinois 60690 Centlemen:
In corrcspondence with you, we have requested infor:ation by specificd datcs to enable us to continue scvcral evaluations in a tinely canner.
In cany instances, your replies have not been submitted within the requested time interval. In several of these instances, you have not infor:cd us in a timaly r,nner of your expected submittal date nor provided justification for the delay. For a ntrr.ber of requests, you hcve provided expected dates of submittal and have not not those dates.
In a letter dated l'. arch 6,1973, we listed a number of replies which were everdue. Your response dated 11 arch 19,1973, presided expected subnittel dates, a number of which have not been net.
In Attachuent A to this letter, we are again listing overdue replics.
In addition, for completencss of the list cf outstandin;; itens, we have cleo listed in Attachment B the anticipated dates of additional replies c pceted of you.
For those replies which are overdue, we request that t'c.e infor.ution be cubnitted within 15 days of the date of this letter.
If any infor-nation en,not be submitted within 15 days, please provide the expected l
data of sub::,ittal and a justification for the delay.
Since delays in your replies create an undue burden on our efforts to maintain schedules and to conduct tinely reviews, we also request that you infern us of neasures to be taken to inprove your respor.sivencsc.
Sincerely, Orir:r.al S.ruc d in A. Gian.busso A. Gianbusso, Deputy Director for Reactor Projecto Directorate of Licensing 1
j ctclosures cnu cc:
bec nextspage
.. l....h.9 -
..l..
=ri
- 1...
.8 0 0 910100 Q
~
n=.
' A
'~
Y f'
,'m Co::nonwealth Edison Company [,,4v
- 7.,,l a 2
/
n..
,"y
Enclosures:
...l:/ /,
1.
Attachment A - Overdue y
- y M We.
~ '
Responses 2.
Attacluneut B - Additional Pending Responses cc v/ enclosures:
John W. Rowe, Esquire Isham, Lincoln & Beale
~
l Counselors at Law.
l One First National Plaza l
Chicago, Illinois 60670 llorris Public Library 604 Liberty Street
-?:
l Morris, Illinois 60451
~,
/
Distribution docket Files AEC PDRs Local PDR RP Reading Branch Reading JRBuchanan, ORNL DJSkovholt,.L:0R TJCarter, L: LR f
ACRS (16)
Ro (3)
MKarman, CGC Haythe, OGC DLZiemann, L:0RB #2 RDSilver, L:0RB #2 RMDiggs, m:JRB #2 AGiambusso, L:RP l
.............,........l..L.:.RP,....
L:0RB #2 L:OR L:0RB #2 l L: ORB #2./
mia -
.g.j..g..
RDsiMu ah.k.mihk........!..Dtnemann..
- ..J7d./2 5.
.DJ.s.uovgoit..
AGiambuss9.
smu:,
[L.D 3..
our,!4/27/.Z3..
..!.4/ 2 Z/ Z.3
/
- e eu~ ie-t w 1-t unis Jove AtC.318 gRev,9-53) AECM C240
6 i
s l
p ATTAQDiENT A
- c OVERDUE RESPONSES xObr review 1adicstes the following responses are overdue.
~,
'D2ESD C 1 e
l'.
Rc; Lies to our June 6,1972, and December 22, 1972 letters on z Emergency Core Cooling Systems. Your letter of March 19, 1973, stat ed a reply would be submitted by April 6,1973.
~
2.
A reply to our December 13, 1972 letter regarding pipe breaks outai h of containment. Your letter of March 19th ctated the regt.ehted information would be submitted by April 6,1973.
3_.
Revisionn to the proposed Technical Specifications which you submitted with your letters of June 15, 1972, and January 25, 1973.
'our letter of March 19, 1973, stated a reply would be submitte'd by April 13, 1973.
- 4. - A reply to our letter of February 26, 1973, regarding anodized Cucl rods for Cycle 9.
Your letter of March 14th stated that the information would be submitted by May 1,1973.
A reply to our letter of December 22, 1972, regarding control circuit design. Your letter of March 7,1973, stated a report would be submitted by May 1,1973.
f)RESD C UNITS 2 AND 3 1.
Co=pletion of the reply to our Nove=ber 14, 1972 letter regarding combustible gas control. Your letter of March 19, 1973, etated l }
the remaining questions were scheduled to be answered by April 6, 1973.
Ccepletien of the reply to our letter of Deccc:2ct 4, 1972, regcrcing 2.
que.lity assurance progra:s.
iour letter of March 19, 1973, tate the fuel quality assurance program would be submitted by April 6, 1973.
3.
A report of transient tests perfcrmed by authorization of Change No. 14 to Docket No. 50-237 dated May 16, 1972. Your letter of
/
March 19,1973, stated that you anticipated submitting a report
.l
'by April 6, 1973.
g I
msav: >
cart
- I
..l.
u.
.u-a-u m ama
.rm e 3rc n,ta n. u n u c u c:4o
_l
f 4.
A report on dynamics test on Dresden 3 described in your letter of Au;;uct 12, 1971. A cocplete report of the test rcsults c.nd your evaluation regarding stability characteristics was requested in cur 1ctter to you on Septer.ber 10, 1971.
1 5.
A reply to our letter of February 2, It73, regarding control rod
[
drop accidents. A reply was requested within 60 days from the date of the letter.
6.
Comprehensive reports presenting the resulte of the initial pre-operational, startup, power ascension, and full power test progra=s for Unit 3.
These reports were required to be sub=itted within one year of the connnercial service date.
7.
A report on the Reload 1 hydrogen getter.
In a conversation on April 3, 1973, you provided an anticipated submittal date of April 20, 1973.
8.
A reply to our letter of Dece:nber 13, 1972, regarding the torus ring header system. Your letter of January 23, 1973, stated a reply would be submitted by 11ay 1,1973.
l l
l l
t l
l CVflCt >
- - - ~~
--~~ '~ --~
ggpN AU[ >
-~~~-:-
D ATE >
- * * * M
- N '
Fwm AEC-S to tRes. 9 53' AICM C240
J ATTAGID;T B ADDITIO';AL PD; DING RESPONSES Additional pending responses and the anticipated dates of submittal arc.
DRESDD{ l A reply to our letter of March 29, 1973, regarding en augnented off-gas system at Dresden 1.
A reply was requested within 60 days of the date of the letter.
DRESDDi 2 AND 3 1.
A reply to our letter of Ilovember 14, 1972, regarding scram reactivity curves.
.our letter of March 5,1973, /tated that a reply would be sube.itted prior to startup of Dresden 3 with the reloaded core.
2.
A reply to our letter of December 14, 1972, regarding pipe breaks outside of containment. Your letter of January 16, 1973 ttated a reply would be submitted by July 1, 973.
~
'3.
A reply to our letter of July 18, 1972, regarding crga'nization of Dresden Unit 2 and 3 licensing documents. Your letter of October 26,
._1972, stated an index would be prepared by June 1973.
FF, --
4.
A reply to our letter of September 28, 1972, re_nrding reporting requirements in Section 6 of the Technical Specifications. Your letter of December 1,1972, mdicated a reply would be submitted approximately 3-1/2 months after issuance of revised Quad-Cities Technical Specifications.
5.
A final report in reply to our letter of August 21, 1972, regarding investigations and codifications of primary systc= cciety valves.
Your letter of narch 26,1973, tated that the final report wouli.
be subnitted prior to Septc.nber 1,.L973.
6.
Analyses of stresses on safvq valves as requested by letter from the Directorate of Regulatory Operations to you dated April 28,
~
1972.
Your letter of March 19, 1973, stated results of analyses will be submitted about June 1,1973.
l
- oma,
..... -l I
n at >
1 i
i
+
i C 8.TE >
i form AECale (Res. 9-W AICM 0240
- e etHs-sted-a
.4 M s D""D "gTj\\b p.
oJU.1.
co
2-7.
Your letter of March 25, 1973, stated that a generic report on the results of torum testing at Quad-Cities Station will be revicacd l
by you for its applicsLility to Dresden Unita 2 and 3.
It in our understanding that your revise of applicability vill be subr.itted to us about one month af ter issuance of the generic report or about l
on June 1.1973.
I 8.
A reply to our letter of April 13, 1973, regarding radiation exposure to plant persotmel. A reply was requested within 60 days of the dste of the letter.
l s.
A reply to our letter of April 23, 1973, rescrding cask drop l
l accident analyscs. A reply is requested for our evaluation pricr l
to use of a spent fuel shipping cash in the fuel storage pools.
- 10. A reply to our letter of May 2,1973, regarding a report on the rod worth minim <rer.
A reply was requested within 30 days of the date of the letter.
I 1
l..
cmcr >
I
-Sp% s ut >
f l
D ATE > !.
1...
.i.
f erro ALC.31s gRev. 9 53) AICM C240
- 3-H-5 W 5-1
+4 5-J e