ML20037B233
| ML20037B233 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1973 |
| From: | Skovholt D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Butterfield L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-03-05.B, TASK-3-5.B, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8009080628 | |
| Download: ML20037B233 (2) | |
Text
,
J Distribution d
g/ ocket Files AEC PDR MAR e 1973 tec,1 paa Dochet Mos 50-1 50-237, RF Reading cnd 50-24 Branch Reading DJSkovholt, L:0R l
l TJCarter, L:0R ACRS (16)
R0 (3)
Commonwealth Edison Company MRarcan, OGC (f
ATTN:
Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
Haythe, OGC DLZiemann, L:0RB #2 Uuclear Licensing Administrator RDSilver, L:0RB. #2 Post Office Box 767 I
Chicago, Illinois 60690 RMDiggs, L:0RB #2 Gentic=en:
In discussions and correspondence with you, we have requested infortction to enable us to complete several evaluations. Our review of project status indicates that several replies from you are overdue.
These items are listed below:
LRESDEN 1 1.
Revisions to the proposed Technical Specifications ubich you submitted with your letters of June 15, 1972, and January 25, 1973.
'2.
Replies to our June 6,1972 and December 22, 1972 letters on l.
Emergency Core Cooling Systems. Our Decc=her 22, 1972 letter requested a reply within 60 days.
3.
A reply to our December 15, 1972 letter regarding pipe breaks outside of containment. Your letter of January 16, 1973, tated the requested information would be submitted at the time that outstanding questions on ECCS are answered.
4.
Analyses of stresses on safety valves as requested by a letter from the Directorate of Regulatory Operctions to you cated April 23, 1972.
5.
A reply to our Movenber 29. 1972 letter regarding ni::ing cnd acasuring hydrogen in containment.
Thic letter requested a j
reply within 90 days.
m 8009080 h [
1
J MAR C T3 Cor.=onwealth Edison Cocpany.,
DPISDEN 2 AND 3 1.
Reply to our Nove:ber 19, 1972 letter regarding carbuctible gns control. Our letter requested a reply by January 14, 1973.
f 2.
Reply to our letter of August 2,1972, regarding torus '.>affles.
Your letter of Nove=ber 27, 1972, _tated an expected-subcittal date of February 1, 1973.
3.
Reply to our letter of December 4,1972, regar;ing quality assurance programs. A reply was rec.ucsted by February 4, 1973.
4.
Analyses of stresses on safety valves es requested by letter from the Directorate of ReEulatory Operations to you dated April 28, 1972.
5.
A final reply to our let ter of August 21, 1972, regarding feed-water control and safety vs.ive performance (also refer to our letter of March 2,1973).
6.
A report of transient tests perforned by authorization of Change No.14 to Docket No. 50-237 dated May 16, 1972.
7.
Reply to our letter of December 22, 1972, regarding control
~
circuit design. A reply was requested by February 22, 1973.
~
Since replies to all items listed above are overduc,
.c request that all information be subnitted within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If any informatior. cannot be submitted within 30 days,. rovide within 10 days of the date of this letter the expected date of submittal and the reason for delay.
Sincerely, Cdgird M,
p, 5. E r =c -.
sonald J. Skovnoit Assistant Director for Operating Reactors Directorate of Licensing
~
cc: John k'. Rowe, 1. squire Icha r, Lincoln & Eenle cmet>
..r. orris..?.ubli.11hrarv
..h..0RB,#2,y,,
h3,[C,Rg,,y lk[:0RB#2,, _
,_LICR,,
, '.V X 7403%')
f I_41en(ann
~
RDSilver:$jh itsiggs D
DJSP 3,,,,, g,,
.,,, 3 /,2 / 7 3,
315 /,73,.
.,,I__3,'
l eut>..
3/2/73 Fcrm AEC.*M Rev.9-53) AFCM Chc
- r. s. cc.rpr$N[rp.tymc orr:ct. we o,=,<