ML20037A635
| ML20037A635 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 10/04/1972 |
| From: | Faulkner H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003250645 | |
| Download: ML20037A635 (4) | |
Text
,. - ~:
.--. m y -- __,
-~,.,.r,
_ -.-., m
,.,,n
,-e
,g.,,;., ; ;,m T/.
sz ;pp;, 7,g 4 g;;ggyy.eicpg= g-w,g c.Wrm.s,.ma. p4= e., M,.p:m7.%,3 g:..q...s.+%gygy.y&.y
.prngg.ppp::
.3cv
[..
w ~.
7-x a.._ 7 e
wk-*-- ~ :.w
~a.rx.4 a m
~gv-W:.
~,,.
+ y.
q:.
.m.
- q : ~ 0: w.g.g g y pqg pgggggg4 4
4,3..g.
7u
. g..
5 s:..
4 =ne.nw =-n.nv m-ar mzaw m-d=muyx.w~~m ma
- w. n.
y l p i,g $..; % ; _.,_ f f g @ a.Tyq9; W : E-M q M # 5 g M _y[y-gl?s @ p %,3 7.3. ;
.:4
....- o =
gp.M2%
3,,.e eu u;
.-a..
a a-e-s:.
, w g..;c, f-D
\\li
, - ~
-00T ' I'A i.
R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Director for Fli?c, L j
THRU:
A. Schwencer, 011ef, PUR-4, L
?EETING WITH FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CONCE!!NING THE OPERATUIC LICENSE '
APPLICATION FOR CRYSTAL.EIVER GIT 3, DOC'GT No. 50-302 r
t Enclosed is a sumary of a rienting held in Dothesda on Septaber 19,
?
1972, with Florida Po'Jor Corporctien. An attendinen list is also enclosed.
. 4 y...
,: A cv R 2L',C2r
..,C..<
H. J. Faulkner "cojcet W narrr W't-4 Directorate of Liennoin::
1 Encicsc.r2s :
1.
'fecting Summry 2.
Attandance List cc: w/enels E. G. Case R. 5. Soyd D. Skovhcit D. Knuth l
R. Maccary R. Iedesco H. Denton R. W. Klecker i
M..Rosen H. Faulkner E. Goulbourne (2)
RO (3) l PWR 3 ranch C.'.cfs Docket file i
i RP Reading 4
P'4R-4 Reading D. Thc=pson
.u,.1?K'S.1 %
1 C, a a. carav w
T-12,120
- EJhat r
- he
"-OOO&^D0h ^
i 9/29/Y2 f".pT'. '7di
[~~-
~
,Fors: AEC-Sto tRev.9 53! AICM 0240 w a s e.avtu e.
==em.c. arn. tes t -446 -e sa -
g t
u.
n.
L
_._____._______.__________.________.__m_
n.
r-
-.. - ~ n.~... -.
-. = - -
- ~
~
n
~
1 kg%O ENCLOSURE l FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION - CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. 50-392 SCffARY OF MEETINC - SEPTE"BER 19, 1972 SUW.ARY A meeting was held in Bethesda on September 19, 1972 to present a letter to Florida Power Corporation containing the AEC positions on three out-standing safety issues:
steam systen design, plant protection against flooding, and augmented staffing during plant startup.
Each position was discussed sufficiently to mini =1:e the. possibility of =isunderstandings by the applicant concerning our requirements.
DISCUSSION The letter was prepared :o previde guidance.to Florida Power Corporation
~
for three outstanding safe:y issues which they ~1 dent 1fied as Laving the potential to cause delays in the cperation of Crystal River Unit 3.
In this content our positions were formulated to provide direct and expedi:icus resolutien of these issues fcr the applicant, thereby, minimizing delay in the operation of this plant.
The specific itens discussed a:. :he teeting are presented below.
1.
Stes: Svsten Desien Uith regard to the stean systen design, Florida Power Cornoration was inforced that : hey cay proceed with the design and procurenent of steanline isola:ica valves for subsequent installation during the first refueling outage of Unit 3.
As an alterna:e, the applicant cculd atte=pt to demonstrate that the need for backfit modifications is not necessary. This issue must be resolved prior to an operating-license decision. Florida Power Corporation stated that an analysis of the likelihood of failure of all four main steamlines is presently underway by 3&W, the reactor vendor.
The results of this analysis are expacted to be conpleted in October. A decision on their part will
.be made following evaluation of this analysis.
4
~
2.
Plant Protectien Acainst Floodinc With respect to. :he ficoding level issue, Florida Power Corporatica was inferred to provide the basis and ' details of ' : heir calculational
~
4 6
,~s
_m.
.~- -
p I
b results and suppcrting-analysis of the maximum surEe level and wave action for the probable caximum hurricane at the site. For the
~
maximum surge level and wave action, 'the Crystal River Unit 3 Power 71 ant must be capable of' being safely shut' down'and naintained 'in that condition.
The applicant agreed that based on revised hurricane criteria-the maximum flood level is cbout 10 fee higher than predicted at the ti=e of the construction permit review.
An' e=banienent slope -(ber=),
which was designed :o protect the plant from the earlier flood levels, n: presently under construction.
Because the ber: 1slan-engineered structure, i.e.,
it is designed to a specific height,
~
with a specific slope, and co= posed of certain caterials', to pro-vide protection for the higher flood level =ay not be a simple increa:,e in bern height. Redesign of the bern.possibly would require a significant analysis, engineering and construction-effort.
In light cf such an effort, we stated that changes or modificaticas in design should be ec=pleted as soon as possible -
and installation of such changes should be cc=pleted as soon as practicable followine approval of the redesign.
3.
Auctented Staffine Durina Plant Startun-Ue. stated our position that certain plant positions vill be-re-quired to either be normally staf fed or otherwise augmen:ed with individuals havi.'g prior participatery experience in the startup -
cnd pcwer ascension testing progran at a reactor of cc= parable ~ size and type. The applicant cuestioned cur inte.,retation of :he verds
" prior par:icipa cry enperience."
D. Thenpson explained tha:.this is intended to =can active involvemen: in those activities appropriate for each position, but it does not necessarily.=ean responsibili:y fcr such activities. More than observation of such -
actitities is definitely required. Florida Power Corporation sta:ed tha: : hey anticipated no proble=s in =eeting our require-
=ent on this issue.
4 Y
a
~
r '.
ENCLOSURE 2 ATTENDANCE LIST Florida Power Corporation R. Ray =ond J. Rodgers J. Hancock R. Snapp AIC/L R. C. DeYoung A. Schwencer H. J. Faulkner D. Thompson O
f e
I l
f I
w