ML20037A407
| ML20037A407 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1972 |
| From: | Zuber L HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DEPT. OF |
| To: | Rogers L US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001140781 | |
| Download: ML20037A407 (2) | |
Text
A s
' NOJ LATE RECE!YED
""O ENT DATE OF 772 1-18-72
~
I 1-1 imemins ama tarten zeenlayment, oTuta.
~ "
muoafi
.utxo, tTs.
. 'wi;ia 30323 Z
CTECRs
! Imo J. Ember CCa CRJCa 1
DATE ANSWERED
! ca Lester Rogers ACTION NECE35 ART
]
i CONCtJRRENCE ]
O sr.
NO Act!oN NECESSARY b
. COMMENT j
FCST CTTICE 50-269 (E3fIBO FILE)
T1LE CCCE I ou
- Cb5*LI.
> oAre {
mEcuvEn af U
3Es. we, mEasta To s. u. avg-r 1.teqz
!tEscuPTicNi tuoi s. vui..=n.4)Ltr re our '2-13-71 ltr... furnishing v/2 cys for ACTION caements on draft Environmental Statemen1
! acd related papers for Oconee Euclear dim'nTurriuN:
} Pcvsr Station, Unit $1...
./ a=, nle 6
- 2xcusuus.
ABC PIB CM14-Me (2)
I Henderson Paulus M. Fitznetrie.t l
DeYoung gn..
'_--- 'e'V 8 y, m
'?-]
Marria/VmW=-
j, ',- -
+ww.n
- >nu.aus r.,
J j
Karas rJ i
Dimano GT A470 I
u.s. Arome catact co>mtssten MAIL CONTROL FORM rczu u; L*M 1968 - 294 - 414
- U. 5. Government Pnnting Office:
IMao 8 0 01140 N /
O
- ' -}-
m
'f" o.
e r.
X
=*
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 8
PEACHTREE SEVENTH BUIL3 NG, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 January 14, 1972 REctoN tv f,g I so-z69 m.ou, as,rw vo, g
s
/
I 1i 4ME (s.
8L Li l_1 3
Mr. Lester Rogers 3 1 3 jg g Director, Division of RacL.ological g
g g.y and Environmental Protection cc,rautaa U.S. Atomic Energy Comission
$8Q Washington, D.C.
20545 S
S lo
Dear Mr. Ro r s:
tie have reviewed the draf t Environmental Statement and related papers on the Oconee Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, of the Duke Power Company (Docket No. 50-269) which yc.u transmitted by letter dated December 13, 1971, to Mr. Edward H. Baxter, Regional Administrator.
These revic<s reveal that there is no objection by this Department in those areas of ccncern or special expertise in which HUD has an interest relative to the Oconca Nuclear Station, Unit 1.
However, there is ancillary coment to proposed future recreational and residential development in the Keowee Lake area. The element of possible subdivision development xjacent to the lake was not clearly defined.
Ex-treme care should be taken to establish good design criteria and development contrcls for this type of developmeca. Any plans and proposals should be coordinateJ ilth the areawide planning agency for that region of South Carolina.
Similarly, designated design criteria and development control should be ex-ercised in providing for recreational uses and its allied comercial activities.
Historically, a majority of lakeside development has left much to be desired in terms of long term utility. Therefore, the necessity of establishing model development control relative to residential, comercial and related develop-ment would be essential to protect and enhance the Keowee-Toxaway environment.
We return herewith a copy of the documentation surplus to our needs.
Sincerely,
.s 9
Y
$hih4p< '
g [ Leo J.
er Acting Assistant Regional Administrator Comunity Planning and Management g
Encio re 1
cp p
23s