Text

Summarizes 930423 Meeting W/Util in Region II Ofc Re Results of Self Assessment of Plant Performance Since 930503.List of Attendees & Self Assessment Presentation Slides Encl
	ML20036A861
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	04/30/1993
From:	Merschoff E; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Tuckman M; DUKE POWER CO.
References
	NUDOCS 9305170104
	Download: ML20036A861 (78)
	v • d • e

-

1 APR 301993 l

Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 License Nos. NPF-35 and NPF-52 Duke Power Company ATTN: Mr. M. S. Tuckman Vice President, Catawba Site 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 Gentlemen:

Subject:

MEETING

SUMMARY

- CATAWBA NUCLEAR SITE, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-413 AND 50-414 This letter refers to the Self Assessment Presentation by your staff to the NRC staff on April 23, 1993, in the NRC Region II Office. The purpose of this presentation _ was to give the results of your own self assessment, of Catawba's -

performance since Stay 3, 1992. The presentation included an overview of human performance, outage management, maintenance and surveillance, radiological controls, modifications, engineering programs, corrective action program, and self-assessment activities. Also, your performance in each of the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance functional areas was discussed.

l The discussion in each area included strengths, initiatives, and challenges.

The presentation provided the NRC staff with an understanding of the results of your assessment.

Enclosed is a list of the meeting attendees and a copy of your presentation.

t In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely, y

At %$

$ $ ' N ' $Ilt k e t Ellis W. Merschoff, Director Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees 2.

Self Assessment Presentation cc w/encls: See page 2 9305170104 930430 PDR ADOCK 05000413 P

PDR s\\-

.T o l

.l APR 301993 1

Duke Power Company 2

cc w/ encl:

l R. C. Futrell l

Conpliance Duke Power Company l

4800 Concord Road

[

York, SC 29745-9635 A. V. Carr, Esq.

l Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street j

Charlotte, NC 28242-0001 i

J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.

t Winston and Strawn 1400 L Street, NW Washington, D. C.

20005 j

i North Carolina MPA-1 j

Suite 600 P. O. Box 29513 Raleigh, NC 27626-0513 i

Heyward G. Shealy, Chief f

Bureau of Radiological Health

. 1 S. C. Department of Health and Environmental Control l

2600 Bull Street j

Columbia, SC 29201 Richard P. Wilson, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General S. C. Attorney General's Office l

P. O. Box 11549 Columbia, SC 29211 Michael Hirsch Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 C Street, Sw, Room 840 Washington, D. C.

20472 i

North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation P. O.. Box 27306 Raleigh, NC 27611 Karen E. Long Assistant Attorney General N. C. Department of Justice P. O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 cc w/ encl: See page 3 u

' l t

i i

s,.,

APR 301993 l

Duke Power Company 3

l cc w/encls: Continued i

Saluda River Electric l

Cooperative, Inc.

P. O. Box 929 Laurens, SC 29360 T. Richard Puryear f

Nuclear Technical Services Manager l

Carolinas District Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 32817 i

Charlotte, NC 28232 County Manager of York County i

York County Courthouse York, SC 29745 i

Piedmont Municipal Power Agency j

121 Village Drive i

Greer, SC 29651 i

G. A. Copp l

Licensing - EC050 Duke Power Company l

P. O. Box 1006 i

Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 1

bec w/encls:

i R. E. Martin, NRR i

W. Miller, RII A. R. Herdt, RII l

S. J. Vias, RII M. S. Lesser, RII I

Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

Route 2, Box 179-N-York, SC 29745

FOR PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE SEE ATTACHED j

RII RI!

MMarshall

AHerdt 04/ /93 04/ /93

t Duke Power Company 3

i cc w/ encl: _ Continued Saluda River Electric Cooperative, Inc.

P. O. Box 929 Laurens, SC 29360 i

T. Richard Puryear Nuclear Technical Services Manager Carolinas District Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 32817 Charlotte, NC 28232 County Manager of York County I

York County Courthouse York, SC 29745 Piedmont Municipal Power Agency 121 Village Drive Greer, SC 29651 G. A. Copp l

Licensing - EC050 Duke Power Company l

P. O. Box 1006

~

Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 i

bcc w/enci-2 R. E. Martin, NRR W. Miller, RII A. R. Herdt, RII

5. J. Vias, RII M. S. Lesser, RII Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 179-N York, SC 29745 i

{

RII RII r/$$

0$b MMarshall AHerdt j

04/:7/93 04/(jj/93 j

]

l l

f

~

d ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES U. S Nuclear Reaulatory Commission S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)

L. A. Reyes, Deputy Regional Administrator, RII J. R. Johnson, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety, RII B. S. Mallet, Deputy Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RII A. R. Herdt, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 3, DRP, RII R. E. Martin, Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate 11-3, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation W. T. Orders, Senior Resident Inspector, Catawba, DRP, RII M. L. Marshall, Reactor Engineering Intern, Project Section 3A, DRP, RII Duke Power Company:

j M. S. Tuckman, Vice President, Catawba Nuclear Site (CNS)

W. R. McCollum, Station Manager, CNS T. P. Harrall, Jr., Safety Assurance Manager, CNS J. S. Forbes, Engineering Manager, CNS R. C. Futrell, Compliance Manager, CNS P

t F

T m

ENCLOSURE 2 t

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION SELF-ASSESSMENT MEETING i

APRIL 23,1993 t

9 6

i i

.l CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION l

i i

SELF-ASSESSMENT MEETING AGENDA.

)

INTRODUCTION M.S. TUCKMAN OPERATIONS W.R. McCOLLUM l

MAINTENANCE /

W.R. McCOLLUM SURVEILLANCE RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS W.R. McCOLLUM ENGINEERING /

J.S. FORBES TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECURITY T.P. HARRALL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS T.P. HARRALL SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

T.P. HARRALL QUALITY VERIFICATION CLOSING REMARKS M.S. TUCKMAN

9 INTRODUCTION I.

ORGANIZATION II.

STRATEGIC PLAN PROCESS III. INPO INDICATORS IV. CHALLENGES

~

t 2

n S

e m

1 m

4 5

e e

c g

F 4

n g

a K

e ia i

n P

n a

lp n

c n

M n

m la la ce o

w a

!a C P r

y ie n a t

)

u r

f r

0 y c v e r

s a

3 m

te e

s r

igR A H o

r n n

(

t y

P.

la r

y o

I O

u t

t r

T.

g efe fe iv P r

a e

r a n N

roh S

R E S E I

t t

r c o e w rikD c y u i D t

la uG Q.

s l

s A

t g

n a

t n s e

ic n

e

)

l i

n s

n a e

re b 4

o ma c m

3 r

e o p e i r

i n F 3

u t

mt d c n

S.

o y

e le MI c

i

(

s g

o E

C S M E C D J.

.le e

R tW y

e

)

itn P 8

u

(

m J.

m T.

o e lo mM C

r c

e m s n t

y r

A n

g u

n a n a

l r

o o

B t

n lo

)

it t

n 1

a e C is e

a C WE n k m t

d M c 5

r T u M

9 e

ia o

e r

AI n

LC S

p TS T.

o R O M WC P i

(

l F

A S.

it a

W.

t M

t m

g e M d d

)

s u 9

s H 1

e

(

s iw n n

s o

u J.

s B

e h n cr c o u s i

o d R

t a

s d e s

)

e A 9

e n y

R 8

y e g

it 1

y o p n r

G

(

e lp mm u t

na c

m&

fa mo a e t

S E C S S u

H e

g 1 i

y

)

n W 4

in 5

ia

(

D r

y T

lit J.

icaF w la it s

s s o e

ie L

)

ir i

4 e

l t5 T.

7 d

,~

ta a c

1 M F m W.

(

uC s

Unit Capability Factor Three year Distribution (1990-1992) unit t unti 2 St.4 77.0 I

i 1995 c a-rA wG A - M%

Median Goal 75.5 80.0 30 --

l jp l

c_

E20-d7 105 units 0

14 -

14 f lii

~

l.

10

.o F'

E a 10-7 c

6 l

5

=

g 3

I:

c-i j

s, 7

F "j~=

i 0-0 10 20

. 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 i

percent GooO +

Catawbo 1). :. before 1990 was estimated liom data collected fiir equivalent availabdity fxtor.

e a

w w r-m v+

-- w w.ny,,%..ee.y-Swwe w

w-vw...wo-im,-,we,,,-w-.y.,-w+e.-yyyev ewww-w ry---e-w e y,-- w,,,w,g v w w we y --,,, w m

, w-,u--wy-+ w. -w s.e +.m+

f

,.,,-u-

-viu+ev.--

-we.i---,

--vy

.n&,

v---rw

,-ww

-.,#-w w*-.i--i,-r

w.. -av-

,, m e + m

Unplanned Capability Loss Factor Three year Distribution (1990-1992)

Unit 2 Unit 1 a.s s.s il 1995 cerad48411 Goal Medlon 4.5.

7.7 3

7

M

-!230- 7 i

E k.

105 units i

j l

+

il 19 g20-

, M E

+=:

10- 9[

7 l Il

4. 4 4

2 g

l E:ll 0-p 0

10

-20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 percent Colowba e gooo Data btlore 1990 was citimated from data collected for equivalcrit availability factor.

t s-7-.+.

..w...

.,-.-..,w---...y

~--g 1,_.-e

,..,..e,,,,,

,.,.-*i<,-y

.,w-v n

,...,n,,-,,--

,_.-.,y,,,,,i.,

,,-,i.y.,-

..,,,r.

e.

e.-,,v,+,.w-,

,%,4--

,- -i..~,

w-e.

v,m,-,

Unplanned Automatic Scrams per 7000 Hours Critical Three year Distribution

-(1990-1992) c ow s4 tist unt: 2 unit t 1.3 1.5 1 1 1995 Median Goal 1.5 1.0 30-

?

23 22 S

20 s20-17 105 units

<:.v::

t O

p

+E

+r.:e E310-

.:+s 7

7 c

5 2

....:<+s.

1 I

5 0

l' 2

3 4

5 scrams per 7000 hours0.081 days <br />1.944 hours <br />0.0116 weeks <br />0.00266 months <br /> crillcol per unil

-*- Go o D Colowbo L

e

-%.-r,-

++-v

---,-,--w-r-nmi

..----,w..

s.-u++

-,,,,<---w.~.<e...4.---.,r-.

,

m e m m -- a e-,4 ww-re.-.-,we-,-n-..w.y v

--...--e-.,,

v~

w.,, - e w + rc

.,+,.,-ww-e,-ww.i,%,,w-

Safety System Performance (PWR)

High Pressure Safety injection System

~

Three year Distribution c.enn mt (1990-1992)

Unit 1 Unli 2 0.023 0.024 ll 1995 Goal l

0.020 40--

l

~

3t l

g I

530-E l

71 units

'5 l

1;; 20-16 i

e i3 h

c10-7l

~

3 1

l

-'l i

i i

l l

I 0-

~

l

.000.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.100 component unavallobilliy / number of trains Colowbo

% Gts g D I,' nits should strive to optimize safety sysicm performance below the industry goal rather alian

.minimite unavailability.

l

Safety System Performance (PWR)

Auxiliary Feedwater System Three year Distribution (1990-1992)

Unli 1 Unit 2 0.029 0.032 c apw on.19q II 1995 Gool 0.025 30--

b:r l

S I

E20-l 71 units 16 l

g

~

u

.a

$10-d l

7 l

c 4

3:2 1

1 1

0-

~-

-~

3

" --p-7 9,

.000.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.100 component unavailability / number of trains Colowbo C CTOOQ (Jniis should strive to optimize safety system perfonnance below the industry goal rather than minimi/c unavailability.

~

.e

r Safety System Performance Emergency AC Power System Three year Distribution (1990-1992)

L cNmw1M - \\%%L 3,,,,,,

o.osa i

1995 Goal 0.025 l

20-l t

l

~

16 !

C H^'

.9 15 -

n i3 E

70 stallons E 10-ii; 7,_

7 a

y n S-C 2 2 a

I ijy "i, 0

.000.010.020.030.040.050.060-.070.080.090.100 overage emergency generator unavailab111ly t

6600 Cotowbo 5

Units should sisive to optimize safety sysicm peiformance below the industry goal rather th.m ininimite unavailability.

+e,--._n.-

e..

v- ---

.--w,,,,.,-.,

w,- w vw---r-+.

-,..,--.,<<--we-.w,-

.-e~~%.,-r-..w+,ww.-..v=m..,%.-.+--,-,--r-,.--ew,,r.-

w w w-

%-w,.-.++,,w.-,-w,-,.,wwww.,#v, www.3m,www,-~-----,,.e-,

_m,-r.-s

4 Fuel Reliability (PWR)

One year Distribution (1992) unit 2 unit :

1.8E-05 7.9C-04 i

I l

fuel Def ect Reference 5.0E.-04 40-34 E 30 -

j' 24 j 73 unlis iti o

g 20-g,:.:.

it:::

o E

z *=

I a

C 10-Elg 5

r 212 l

qi I

0-1E-07 1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 IE-03 1E-02 IE-01 1E+00 1E+01 -

corrected 1-131. oclivity (microcuries/ gram)

^

" bD00 Cotowbo A value aime 5 011-4 indicates a higli probability of unit operation with fuel defects. 'lluncter, inslicator values may not prmide a reliable inilication of Iuct perfininance for units with psuss tie-Arturate ilesermination of cuirent fuel peitorinance generally reiluites inure sophisticateil rea is.

analysis 1,3 niility scattor copincers. linits slunild sesive to ope: ate witti icio fuel defeus rather ilusi nonnnie.n: iln; in h ator value.

... ~ _..... - - _.,

..... _.,. - -.... _. _.. ~ _. -. _.. -. - _ -,, _ _ _ -, _ -. - -. - -. _..

Collective Radiation Exposure (PWR)

Three year Distribution (1990-1992) unti i Unit 2 278 278 C AwwoA -19911995 Goal Median 185 213 fl 40--

i 31 E30-

,a "E

2:1- !

$ j 71 units h20-8fl l 15 iU h:

eji E

g i32

,3 E

q p::: i}:::

?. 0 10-3;.

4 i::I li 4

8I I

1 1

I'2 0-l l-l 0

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 man-rom por unil Colowbo Good e

m.

g 3

-.i.-

h m

Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste (PWR)

Three year Distribution (1990-1,992) 1 unti i unit 2 74 74 l

1995 Median Goal 93 110

i. !

60-

.ll ca rnwan-au

!I n

.t 40 l 8 40-

-t-+ :-

71 un.ts i

-;p'::::

"l o

u 2

E if I

220-

' 15

.:::l'!

f:

.:If::.

7 7

8!

6:i 2

?!

h::

1 0=

0 100 200 300 400 500 600.

cubic meters per~unli Colowbo

+ GooO

,,-w

.....~-.,--.-... - - -. -.. -,

=--~w.

,ivw.,

e ee.~w.+-

c -.

v.-w r

,,.vv-e-Jyv,~..#.r-

~~m--*,.-mw-*w--...,~-e,--++w--

--w~,,rr

t j

i OPERATIONS I.

OPERATIONS TRAINING l

1 II.

HUMAN PERFORMANCE q

t i

III. OUTAGE MANAGEMENT / PERFORMANCE i

i IV. CHALLENGES i

i f

l r

i

I t

l l

OPERATIONS j

OPERATIONS TRAINING l

l e

EOP USAGE 1

e MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT l

e OPERATIONS TRAINING COORDINATOR e

LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING STEERING COhBinTEE

[

i i

9 h

l

OPERATIONS 1

HUMAN PERFORMANCE MISPOSITIONINGS EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT YIELDED POSITIVE RESULTS CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE TAGGING i

PROCESS PROCEDURES EOP REWRITES CATAWBA OPERATIONS PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP l

CATAWBA OPERATIONS PROCEDURE FOCUS GROUP PROCEDURE PROBLEM RESOLUTION BOARD EMPLOYEEINVOLVEMENT MFE/ STAR CIA, D/G BfPROVEMENT TEAM, D/G SIMULATOR OPERATOR EXCHANGE VISITS

t 1t t-e e

w 9

r 9

w g

n y

p y

r W

w T

C p

a E

y y

D e

~

u

~

-r W

' ~ V ar

.l 4iI:

iii <;.i' 4!

I dO W

N u

a W

s r

e L

+

A h

.!b C T

T P

+

,t!

+4 i6

?

ig!:tI!i>i;li!

.Ir d.

O g

O T

e m

.X,s g

w y

y

?

r P

a g

\\

r T

P O!.

i' !nI4 E

p

, 'I!

I S

e y

7 N

4 M

S S

P p

y O

r G

?U um G

y N

.iI i

{.EI

!i!

!\\A e

W

,S D

q IN

. y s

O pe T

!i!ij $

1j iiii ~

.I!f

, !x H

L I

e C l:>

U e

i J

s S

N.

I E

ss A

a g

I e

a m

O e\\

=

g PS A

I TN m

e U

./

J 7

I M

s au R

E 2

Y H

4 T

9 t-

,it'

.ii),ci;!

A y

O M

se 9

m y

1 g

O R

m p

,'l

!i l1i

.li P

m A

w

.~

M E

~

e H

w C

w

.~,

R q

A p;s M

i,

t t

/-

y e

p w

,l t

,ij,tt 1

i!IIi!,

! (i.l6E p

~ <

g B

F g

s e

N

~

-r e

t N

m c A e

J 9.

4 2

0 8

6 4

2 O

w 1

1 1

cc*>w *5.c9.:t.8a95

, w 9

h g

w w

w

~

i i

OPERATIONS OUTAGE MANAGEMENT / PERFORMANCE e

IMPROVEMENTS IN OUTAGE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OUTAGE GOALS OPERATIONS OUTAGE PLANNING GROUP PROCEDURES FOR INFREQUENTLY PERFORMED i

TESTS / EVOLUTIONS OUTAGE SYSTEM ALIGNMENT TEAM VALVE TEAM t

e SHUTDOWN SAFETY STRONG CONFIGURATION CONTROL PROCESS COMMITMENT TO SAFETY IMPROVEMENT F

i SPARE EMERGENCY DIESEL-1 SAFETY-ENHANCEMENT THROUGH MANAGEMENT FOCUS AND COMMUNICATION f

" DEFENSE IN DEPTH" SHEETS i

r FOCUS ON MIDLOOP OPERATIONS T

0

t i

OPERATIONS l

P CHALLENGES f

I t

REQUAL TRAINING j

i INCREASED MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT

[

~

STRENGTHENED OPS / TRAINING PARThTRSHIP t

OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP OF 1

TRAINING i

PROCEDURES r

COMPLETE EOP UNRADE CONTINUE TO IMPROVE CONSISTENCY OF USAGE i

[

f t

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE l

t I.

STRENGTHS II.

FOCUS ON THE HUMAN ELEhENT II

I. PROCEDURE

S IV. PLANT EQUIPAENT V.

CHALLENGES

~

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE

~

1 STRENGTHS INDICATORS CAPACITY FACTOR SAFETY SYSTEM OPERABILITY FORCED OUTAGE RATE SCRAMS COMPONENT FAILURE RATE SIGNIFICAhTLY IMPROVED REASONS e

EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT TEAM e

LOW TURNOVER - RESULTS IN EXPERIENCED CRAFT AGGRESSIVE APPROACH TO PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE STRONG TRAINING COMMITMENT CONTINUING PROCEDURE IMPROVEMENT r

t MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE

~

L i

FOCUS ON THE HUMAN ELEMENT EMPLOYEE TRAINING & QUALIFICATION SYSTEM e

UPGRADES SUPERVISOR /PLAhWER EXCHANGE e

TEAM BUILDING SESSIONS r

RESOURCES FOR IMPROVEMENT - MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITIES b

l i

i

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE

~

r PROCEDURES r

t e

PROCEDURE UPGRADES i

BIPROVED PROCESS BIPROVED PRODUCT i

i i

b I

y

~w

,-m n

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE i

i PLANT EQUIPMENT IMPROVED EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE i

e STRONG ENGINEERING / CRAFT TEAMWORK e

CRAFT OWNERSHIP OF PROBLEM RESOLUTION e

CONSERVATIVE APPROACH TO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE i

CHALLENGES CONTINUE TO IMPROVE OUR PROFESSIONAL CULTURE I

h PROACTIVELY RESPOND TO CHANGE PLANT EQUIPMENT AGING s

i

~

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS I.

10CFR20 IMPLEMENTATION II.

EFFLUENT CONTROL / UNPLANNED RELEASES i

III. DOSE CONTROL / SOURCE REDUCTION IV. CONTAMINATION CONTROL V.

RADIATION MONITORS VI. CHALLENGES i

l

l RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS i

10CFR20 IMPLEAENTATION I

e RADIOACTIVE MONITORING & CONTROL SYSTEM i

.4 o

ELECTRONIC DOSE CAI'R.UtE I

e HARSHAW TLD SYSTEM i

t 1

t i

3 i

l l

r RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS EFFLUENT CONTROL / UNPLANNED RELEASES o

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING e

GASEOUS & LIQUID EFFLUENTS e

NO UNPLANNED RELEASES i

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS DOSE CONTROL / SOURCE REDUCTION l

t e

COIJRCTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE e

TELEDOSBETRY i

I CRUDBURSTS a

1 i

f I

s i

[

P f

r i

I h

I I

w M_%

ta4 m

m mm,..

G m.

wvA

.+s4.

a.

en e

u

..u_,

i.m

. __ mama 4

e CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION 1993 ESTIMATE VS ACTUAL PERSON REM

~

600

~

q 500 -

7

' T 3 Estimate

'/

/

~

f

./

400 -

Actual o

7

/

'/

300 -

/

l l f

. f f l

/

f 4

.g 2*-

/

l 4

1 J 1 s iu;+;

O ru l gk La i

J AN FEBM ARAPRM AYJUN JUL AUG SEP OCTNOVDEC

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS CONTAMINATION CONTROL i

DECON & CONTROL OF TOTAL CONTAMINATED AREA l

RADIOLOGICAL INCIDENT INVESTIGATION i

ACCOUNTABILITY j

l CATCH CONTAINMENT PROGRAM SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT i

f r

t i

i

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS RADIATION MONITORS RADIATION MONITOR MODIFICATIONS RADIATION MONITOR SYSTEM TEAM l

i i

MODULE UPGRADES j

POST ACCIDENT CONTAINMENT SAMPLING SYSTEM (PACS) l l

i

RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM (EMF)

AVAILABILITY MAY 1991 - MARCH 1993 100%

95% ;-

o 1

1 3

99% ;-

a

=

m

= wx 1

2 Tw; T

m 1-85% --

T s

s r.

s 80% -

75%

l l

l

+

i t

-- I z

s e

n.

e--

o m

a e

z s

e n.

o n

m e

m 3

m o

w w

a a

3 m

o w

3 o

z o

z 2

z o

z 2

a, 3

2 TOTAL NON TECHNICAL r

TECHNICAL. SPECIFICATION RELATED SPECIFICATION RELATED o

-,v-

- > + -.,, - -, -,

--.,av,..

- + -.

-, -, - ~ ~ -

.--,a-

,-r,e

-~,w

.<,.---n

......v--~-,

v-

~ <

v r-r>.

-n,r~.------w

.,-w~.-n m

- -+

1 I

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS 1

CHALLENGES i

t l

t CONTINUE SOURCE TERM REDUCTION i

8 e

DOSE REDUCTION FOR LOW-DOSE JOBS 1

'1 i

f h

l t

t

[

i t

l ENGINEERING i

l

(

I.

MODIFICATION HIGHLIGIITS

(

II.

SYSTEM / PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS 1

i III.

CHALLENGES FOR XEXT SALP PERIOD i

1 j

1 ENGINEERING MODIFICATION HIGHLIGHTS REG GUIDE 1.47 SAFETY SYSTEM - BYPASS PANEL Feedback from OPS Fastrack design Graphic operator interface Unit 1 is installed, Unit 2 in progress 4

1 y,--on-

,,-me,ww-r,-,-v,

-m

,.ev-r-,-

v,.r..~,,,>,,m-e-+

n-w--

w,-

r---

+

e-

r e

em-=ven,,.,-,

.,v.-+,-e--a

, -, - -.n-, - -~, - - -.

,--r-.<

- ~ -

ENGINEERIN~G MODIFICATION HIGHLIGHTS 1

. DIESEL GENERATOR TRIP LOGIC MODIFICATION converted pneumatic trip logic to electrical digital display I

NUCLEAR SERVICE WATER VALVE REPLACEMENTS 14 Header Return Valves replaced Challenges Execution

l ENGINEERING l

PROGRAMS DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION PROGRAM I

43 OF 83 DBDs COMPLETED TO DATE (TOTAL) e 10 DBDs COMPLETED IN 1992 t

b%

e

+~..,m-

,,,w4

-vr r

y

--m e

e m

,e-----,-

c-e

5 ENGIXEERING PROGRAMS CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION TREND.OF LERs DECREASING ITT HYDROMOTORS CIHLLER IMPROVEMENTS e.~~.,4,.

.. -,...,v-*,..,m....

m

~..c-..

-.-..-~,,-.._m.-e,......,

. -,,.-.~,

m

.-r.>

b i

l i

- lI i

l i

i on 1

Y u

l l

i h

P i

l l

E9 l

R

(

a I

C i

\\

O a=w J

C O

=0 E

=

- - C On.

O m

Y,'

i E

v>

.i O

O 2

O t::

C Oo E

=

a==

l l

c

.o m

es u

o 4

yw. -

-,.-,v-,,.w,,w, wm,,,

-. = - - - -

,-,.r ww gyre w

y----w w-

1

~

l ENGINFERING L

l l

PROGRAMS SAFETY SYSTEM AVAILABILITY l

INCREASED AWARENESS i

e COORDINATED MAINTENANCE AND TEST ACTIVmES l

REVISED PROCEDURES l

l l

MOVED ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AND TESTING INTO OUTAGES l

WHERE POSSIBLE l

f SAFETY SYSTEM AVAILABILITY l

1991 Unavailability 1992 Unavailability System Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 w

. Auxiliary Feedwater (CA) 2.43 %

3.94 %

0.91 %

0.42 %

ECCS 2.57 %

4.19%

0.70 %

0.97 %

Diesel Generator (D/G) 4.1%

8.6%

1.22%

1.69 %

)

e i

.>...<,..~s

...~~,...mm.mw.....-.--,,+.,,-__.,eu-

.4

...,.m-.--

..v.,---,-..

,w-,--....

_,-,.. --.-+mm--,,-u.- e #,6

.r,

,..~.-..-v

-.., - - -.,,, - + - 4m

.,--w

l CATAWBA CFAR RESULTS t

I r

SITE SPECIFIC COMPONENT FAILURE RATES WHICH MET CRITERIA FOR 'SIGNIFICANT"

(

r 6

50 48 I

45 --

b 40

~

35 -

t

~

3G __

26 25 --

23 g

10

~~~~~

10 4

i 5-0--

i i

Apr-90 Oct-90 Oct 91 Apr-92 Oct-92 Apr-93 t

I t

4/15/93 apr-91 Data Not Avallable

1 ENGIXEERING PROGRAMS RADIATION. MONITORING SYSTEM (EMFs)

CTEAM GENERATOR WATER SAMPLE MONITOR (EMF 34)

INOPERABILITY ON BOTH UNITS RESOLVED e

EFFORTS OF EMF SYSTEM TEAM IIAVE RESULTED IN RECORD AVAILABILITY AND RETURN TO SERVICE OF ALL TECII SPEC MONITORS 1993 Availability Through February o

99% for Tech Spec Monitors l

0 95% for All Other Monitors 97% for Entire EMN System o

T 4

RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM AVAILABILITY 100%

q-

.t

-m 98%

96%

9496 1

92%

90% -

N

-i 68%

. ~ - -

- ~

~

86%-

24% -

82%

I APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR e TECH SPEC RAD MONITORS (1991-1992)

TEQH SPEC RAD MONITORS (1972-1993)

=

I t4 e

O e

-w-,,r-e,---e m. - gr,-w*

wm--wy--+->-,*e-er-e-re-m-c--

s-->ewy*4---eww--i,c-,---+--+tw--r--+-1yw-,t-e--e<t-t-t

"-+-w n-u-+~~--w~*e&r-=e

--a t-

=-e-w**'*e**-w'a*

--t""-----+

en +e v

=-'-ei

-v=-=+tw*>

eb+ - e M em% r

rww e2m'-

ENGIXEERING PROGRAMS RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM (EMFs) i MODULE UPGRADE 15% (14 OF 93) COMPLETE Replacing Outdated Analog Output Modules with New Digital Version 9

In-Depth Technical Review of Calibration and Surveillance Procedures a

4 9

ENGIXEERING PROGRAMS CATAWBA EDSFI INSPECTION CONDUCTED DURING JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 1992 A NUMBER OF ITEMS WERE IDENTIFIED THAT REQUIRED FURTHER WORK FOLLOWUP INSPECTION COMPLETED 4/2/93 ALL FIVE VIOLATIONS CLOSED.13 OF 15 FINDINGS CLOSED.1 NEW FINDING INITIATED ON VOLTAGE DROP.

e t

1 - +v v

-er,---ww.,-,,,,

e rvwr,

v w ~ c,1 A--i<rv-.-*ew+m--

ve---,-*-

.--r-e,"

-e-i--~

-.--4w,v v.----..-ww+,

y--,-w pow-w

~+-v

ENGIXEERING f

PROGRAMS SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEWS AUXILIARY FEEDWATER (CA) SYSTEM DESIGN PROBLEMS previous problem with runout protection / flow optimization inoperability of transfer to assured makeup due to non-safety input review of CA by multidisciplined team identifies inoperability due to only Train A signal to fail TDFWP to maximum speed b

r ENGINEERING i

l PROGRAMS SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEWS REVIEWS EXPANDED TO OTHER 1E ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 4

58 systems addressed 1500 workhours expended over 5 months 1

no inoperable conditions discovered 46 g n u-e

.-,n,.---n,~~.

en,--~,-.

w

, - ~

~~--n,--

...a

--.n.

w..

n.,--,-,--s.----

,.,-----,-e.

,-.,n,.,.

-,-..-, +,=~+-,-c-

-r,

-.-,.e.,,

-..-,n.,

..,,>. - - -.w

l ENGIXEERING l

1 PROGRAMS GENERIC LEITER 89-10 GROUP 1 - MOTOR OPERATED VALVES DESIGN BASIS SYSTEM CALCULATIONS (e.g., flow, pressure, position, etc.) COMPLETE COMPONENT CALCULATIONS (e.g., operator & valve setup factors)

APPROXIMATELY 70% COMPLETE MOV OPERATOR QUALIFICATION PROGRAM COMPLETED APPROXIMATELY 50% OF SINGLE FAMILY SMALL GLOBE VALVE DIFFERENTIAL TEST PROGRAM DELTA P TESTING ON SC5EDULE i

e

=.

ENGIXEERING PROGRAMS GENERIC LEITER 89-10 1

COMPLETED OFF SITE FLOW LOOP TESTS OF 10" AND 42" BOrrERFLY VALVES. DATA REDUCTION IN PROGRESS 1m g t

34

-,w--=v, r

w,-,4v3=,,

ww. reew-~v,+r~+

.wa

.+www, e-

...w.,

-~-,,w---

--+=<sw-

...-v.----==

-vw-.

-- v c s

,.--m-e-~

n

--.-n--+--..e

l l

ENGINEERING l

CHALLENGES FOR NEXT SALP PERIOD i

STREAMLINE / IMPROVE MODIFICATION PROCESS GL 89-10 STEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT MAINTENANCE RULE OPERATOR AID COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION AVAILABILITY IMPROVEMENT e

,-we.,---,-.m.,-,..-

.-y

,.v.re,--.,y<-we,

,..w..ww-.w

. ~ - -

,m,

--v

-c...

,.. ~...,--

y+

.i%

- -,. ~.~,-,,,,

,.., - -. -. - - -.. -. ~,,,,,,..

w

~e...,,,-*w*i.-

.~ ~. -, --.-=+-

t i

l SECURITY t

?

I.

MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT r

l II.

HARDWARE IMPROVEMEhTS i

l III. CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM i

i i

t IV. CHALLENGES i

i I

i l

?

(

~

[

t t

SECURITY l

l o

MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT i

i l

l QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TEAMS j

i HIGH LEVEL OF EMPLOYEEINVOLVEMENT 8111tT SCliEDULE BIPROVED BADGING IMPROVEMENTS i

i e

SECURITY EQUIPhENT/ BARRIER SPECIALIST t

1 CREATING NEW POSITION IN SECURITY PROVIDE ON S111tT MAINTENANCE AND TESTING CAPABILITY FOR SECURITY EQUIPMENT l

1 DECREASE TBE SPENT ON COMPENSATORY MEASURES

SECURITY L

i HARDWARE IMPROVEMENTS 7

e VIDEO CAFTURE SYSTEM i

PROVIDES " FRAME BY FRAME" CAPABILITY IMPROVES ALARM RESPONSE f

~

e CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SWITC11EK GREATLY IMPROVES PICTURE QUALITY i

ALLOWS FOR FUTURE EXPANSION OF CCTV I

CAPABILrrY

~

f t

IMPROVES ALARM RESPONSE l

i e

BADGE ISSUE MONITORS l

PROVIDES A MONITOR AT EACH BADGING WINDOW ADDITIONAL METHOD TO ENSURE PROPER BADGE l

ISSUANCE i

i i

s 1

SECURITY l

I CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM t

SECURITY PIONEERED THE TRENDING PROGRAM AT l

e CATAWBA TRENDING PROGRAM CONTINUES TO AID IN IDENTIFYING e

PROBLEMS l

MISISSUED BADGES l

i UNLOCKED ALARM DOORS j

i UNCONTROLLED VITAL AREA KEYS l

i e

SECURITY TRENDING PROGRAM INTEGRATED INTO SITE PROBLEM INVESTIGATION PROCESS i

f i

I i

I l

T i

f I

i

SECURITY CHALLENGES e

CONTINUE STRONG PERFORMANCE i

i I

5 i

I i

i

t EMERGENCY PREPAREDhTSS I

r 4

i I.

DRILLS AND EXERCISES L

II.

FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT i

f III. MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT t

I IV. CHALLENGES i

l

\\

i I

L i

l l

l i

I i

r I

b e

i EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILLS AND EERCISES j

f a

CONTINUED AGGRESSIVE DRILL SCHEDULE 8 SIMULATOR DRIVEN STATION DRILLS j

i 4 CONTAMINATED INJURY DRILIR WITH OFFSITE SUPPORT 2 FIRE DRILLS WITH OFFSITE SUPPORT i

1 OFF-HOURS UNANNOUNCED STAFF AUGMENTATION DRILL EXPANDED SCOPE OF DRILL SCENARIOS i

INCLUDING SECURITY AND HAZMAT f

IMPROVED STAFF AUGMENTATION CAPABILITY DUTY ROTATION FOR REQUIRED POSITIONS PAGERS AND AUTOMATED CALLOUT SYSTEM i

CONTINUED USE OF MOCK-UPS FOR ADDED REALISM b

i

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT l

TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER REMODELED B1 PROVED LAYOUT FACILITATES COMMUNICATIONS e

ADDED VIDEO TELECONFERENCING BETWEEN TSC AND OSC B1 PROVED COhBfUNICATION e

ENHANCED DATA DISPLAY AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ELECTRONIC ENVIRONMENT NEAR REAL TBE DATA LOGKEEPING I

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS I

i l

t MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT 1

-I e

FULLY IMPLEMENTED NEW ENERGENCY ORGANIZATION i

I l

IMPROVED EhERGENCY PLAN AND PROCEDURES SITE LEADERSHIP OF EOF DEEPER EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION l

IMPROVED RESPONSE TIME l

e SUPPORT INVOLVENENT IN INDUSTRY ACTIVITIES l

INPO PEER REVEW (DAVIS - BESSE AND ZION) l RECIPROCAL AUDITS (VOGTLE) i f

t J

e INCREASED RESOURCES FOR TRAINING IMPROVEhENT PROJECT FULL ASSESShENT OF EP TRAINING hTEDS i

l

}

i j

4

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CHALLENGES t

e CONTINUED STRONG PERFORMANCE BY EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION i

l CONTINUE TO BUILD UPON POSITIVE i

RELATIONSHIPS WITH STATES AND COUNTIES i

i l

I i

e SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

1 i

QUALITY VERIFICATION i

f i

6 f

i l

l 1

l 6

t

A SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

QUALITY VERIFICATION STRONG, SAFE PLANT STRONG SA/QV

=>

PROGRAM PERFORMANCE 9

...w,

-y_

.-..r.~

,,_,r.,,-

,,.___7.c.,,.,,.-,,-c...

s,._-,,-,.,,.,~,,,.._,,_..y_,

.,y,-

m.

3

.yv...

-, - -,..,,.,_m._,.,,,,_y

..,v,,.

,m,

1

?

SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

QUALITY VERIFICATION i

i PLANT PERFORMANCE

[

{

FEWER LERS s

FEWER VIOLATIONS f

i e

FEWER SIGNIFICANT EVENTS FEWER FORCED OUTAGES /Rx TRIPS i

e LONGER UNIT RUNS IMPROVED OUTAGE PERFORMANCE P

I I

P i

SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

QUALITY VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES i

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES LICENSING ACTIVITIES e

CHALLENGES I

l

SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

QUALITY VERIFICATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM t

e PROBLEM INVESTIGATION PROCESS (PIP) t MATURING PROCESS o

CATAWBA LEADERSHIP

'o INCLUDES INDUSTRY GOOD PRACTICES t

o COMMON PROCEDURE AND ELECTRONIC TOOL t

MAJOR ELEMENTS INCLUDE o

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION o

ROOT CAUSE DEIERMINATION o

CORRECTIVE ACITONIDENTIFICATION o

TRACKING o

TRENDING l

PROCESS IS HEALTHY o

ML20036A861

Contents

Text

Subject:

SUMMARY

Enclosures:

I. PROCEDURE

Navigation menu

ML20036A861

Text

Subject:

SUMMARY

Enclosures:

I. PROCEDURE

Navigation menu

Search