ML20035G271
| ML20035G271 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1993 |
| From: | Callan L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Withers B WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9304270065 | |
| Download: ML20035G271 (5) | |
Text
-*.
ggd REGef UNITED STATES f[..
(.,5 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-m 5
] q @,I j REGION IV IQ V!
611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SulTE 400
- Q
[
AR LINGTON, T E XAS 76011-8064 Y
e4....."
APR 2 l 1993 t
Docket:
STN 50-482 License: NPF-42 e
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation I
ATTN:
Bart D. Withers
't President and Chief Executive Officer P.O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839
SUBJECT:
CHANGES IN CORRECTIVE ACTION COMMITMENTS TO EXERCISE WEAKNESS 482/9119-04 We have received your letter dated April 8,1993, which notified NRC of' changes to corrective action commitments you made in response to exercise weakness 482/9119-04.
This weakness concerned control and protective measures exercised by field monitoring teams.
This weakness was closed in NRC Inspection Report 50-482/92-14 following the successful demonstration of your corrective measures during the last annual exercise.
l In your April 8.1993 letter, you informed NRC that you are modifying your previous commitments by eliminating the procedural requirement for monitoring teams to take self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBAs) for respiratory
[
protection when the team is deployed.
Your modified commitments are to provide more detailed procedural guidance for field monitoring activities including the option to deploy SCBAs with the teams.
There is no NRC requirement for field monitoring teams to be equipped with SCBAs. NUREG 0654, planning standard K.2 specifies, however, that licensee's shall provide an onsite radiation protection program to be implemented during l
emergencies, including methods to implement exposure guidelines. We concur that procedural control of field teams. combined with the easy availability or respiratory protection equipment that could be used if conditions warrant is i
an acceptable means of implementing the planning standard.
We will review this issue during future inspections.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact
}
Dr. D. Blair Spitzberg of my staff at (817) 860-8191.
i Sincerely, h
['l f O rh,
[ LL%t&M l
/
L. J. Callan, Director fDivisionofRadiationSafety and Safeguards l
A I
l 9304270065 930421 ADDCK 0500 2
gDR L/
i
i i
Wolf Creek Nuclear l Operating Corporation l
i i
CC.
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.
ATTN: Otto Maynard, Director Plant Operations P.O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839 j
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge ATTN: Jay Silberg, Esq.
2300 M Street, NW Washington, D.C.
20037 l
l Public Service Commission ATTN:
C. John Renken l
Policy & Federal Department j
P.O. Bcx 360 t
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region III t
799 Roosevelt Road i
Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 l
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.
i ATTN:
Kevin J. Moles Manager Regulatory Services i
P.O. Box 411 l
Burlington, Kansas 66839 Kansas Corporation Commission ATTN:
Robert Elliot, Chief Engineer t
Utilities Division l
1500 SW Arrowhead Rd.
Topeka, Kansas 66604-4027 l
Office of the Governor l
State of Kansas j
Topeka, Kansas 66612 j
i Attorney General l
1st Floor - The Statehouse Topeka, Kansas 66612
-l Chairman, Coffey County Commission Coffey County Courthouse Burlington, Kansas 66839-1798 i
)
F l -'
i s
')
l
-..m
I l
s l
j Wolf Creek Nuclear t Operating. Corporation j
'i Kansas Department of Health and Environment i
Bureau of Air Quality & Radiation Control ATTN: Gerald Allen, Public Health Physicist i
Division of Environment
- (
Forbes Field Building 321 l
Topeka, Kansas 66620 Kansas Department of Health and Environment f
ATTN:
Robert Eye, General Counsel l
L50B, 9th Floor i
~
900 SW Jackson i
Topeka, Kansas 66612 i
=
Program Manager
'l FEMA Region 7 911 Walnut Street Room 200 Kansas City, Missouri 64106
?
i i
r i
1 l
{
t f
f
'I i
[
e,
i Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation bcc to DMB (IE35) bcc distrib. by RIV w/ copy of letter dated April 8,1993:
J. L. Milhoan B. Murray, DRSS/FIPS D. B. Spitzberg, FIPS DRP Section Chief DRP/D Project Engineer, DRP/D Section Chief DRP/TSS Section Chief (RIII, DRP/3C)
SRI, Callaway, RIII DRS Wolf Creek. Resident Inspector MIS System DRSS/FIPS File RIV File Lisa Shea. RM/ALF, (MS MNBB 4503)
W. Reckley, NRR Project Manager (MS 13 HIS)
C. A. Hackney, RSLO I
i
!l l
l f
i i
\\
~
RIV:FIPS D L--
C:FIPS
.DD:DRSSM6 D:DRSShf DBSpitzberg:nh BMurray
[DDChamberlain LJCallanh l
t/19/93 hh93 4 /2b /93 4/20/93 f
1 Wolf Creek Nuclear $
Operating Corporation I
bcc to DMB (IE35)
-i bcc distrib. by RIV w/ copy of letter dated April 8,1993:
j J. L. Milhoan i
B. Murray, DRSS/FIPS D. B. Spitzberg, FIPS i
DRP l
Section Chief, DRP/D Project Engineer, DRP/D Section Chief, DRP/TSS i
Section Chief (RIII, DRP/3C)
Wolf Creek, Resident Inspector i
MIS System DRSS/FIPS File i
RIV File Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, (MS MNBB 4503)
W. Reckley, NRR Project Manager (MS 13 HIS)
C. A. Hackney, RSLO j
(
i l
l l
i l
l RIV:FIPS D L.-
C:FIPS h
,DD:DRSS[J6 D:DRSSk UDDChamberlain LJCallanh DBSpitzberg:nh BMurray Y/19/93 M 93 9 /2h /93 i/20/93
5 J
LF CREEK W@ NUCLEAR OPERATING Robert C. Hagan 993 vice President Nuclear Assurance g
U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:
Document Centrol Desk Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, D.
C.
20555
Reference:
- 1) Letter dated September 19, 1991 from A.
Bill Beach, NRC, to B.
D. Withers, WCNOC
- 2) Letter WM 91-0145 dated October 30, 1991 from B.
D. Withers, WCNOC, to NRC
Subject:
Docket No. 50-482:
Change in Commitment Associated to, Exercise Weakness 482/9119-04 Gentlemen:
This letter provides notification of a change in commitment made by Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC).
This commitment was made in response to Exercise Weakness 482/9119-04 documented in Reference 1.
Exercise Weakness 482/9119-04 concerned examples of poor coordination and control of field monitoring teams.
This weakness was the result of only one of four field teams making contact with the plume during a 2-hour period following the onset of the release.
This situation, compounded by prcblems with subsequent control of the team during sampling efforts, resulted in high exposures to the team.
Part of the weakness was also attributed to a lack of equipment, in particular self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA).
In the response provided to the weakness (Reference 2),
the cause of the weakness was attributed to a lack of procedural guidance.
The associated procedurer were revised to provide additional guidance.
Additionally, WCNOC committed to require field monitoring teams to take SCBAs with them when deployed.
A re-evaluation of this response has determined that the requirement to take SCBAs when deployed is unnecessary and therefore has been deleted.
- However, to minimize personnel exposure, the field team monitoring guidelines in procedures, EPP 01-1.1, "WCGS Organization," EPP 01-1.2, " Emergency Operation facility Emergency Organization," and EPP 01-8.2, "Offsite Radiological Monitoring," are being further enhanced to provide for more detailed guidance en definition, timing and location of plume monitoring.
These enhancements also include exposure considerations, exposure limits and guidelines, environmental precautions (such as travel detours due to the reservoir and cooling lake), and precautions on the need for and coordination of SCBA use when conditions warrant them.
Procedure EPP 01-8.1, "Onsite Radiological Monitoring," is also being enhanced to emphasize exposure control and personnel protection.
With these procedural enhancements, the requirement to take SCBAs upon field monitoring team deployment will not be necessary.
Procedure EPP 01-8.3 which was originally revised in response to this weakness, has been subsequently incorporated into procedures EPP 01-8.1 and EPP 01-8.2.
PO Box 411/ Burhngton. KS 66839 / Phone (316) 364-6831
^h Ih An Equal Opportunity Employer WFMCNET
'7 1:
y NA 93-0095 Page 2 of 2 l
Due to the additional procedural enhancements it has been determined this does i
not constitute a reduction in a conndtment nor a decrease to the effectiveness of the Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
This conenitment change was discussed with Dr.
D.
B.
Spitzberg of Region IV, NRC.
If you have any questions concerning this change in commitment, please contact i
me at (316) 364-8831 extension 4553 or Mr. Kevin J. Moles at extension 4565.
Very truly yours,
/
Rcbert C.
Hagan Vice President
~"
Nuclear Assurance RCH/jad cc:
W.
D. Johnson (NRC)
J. L. Milhoan (NRC)
G. A. Pick (NRC)
W.
D. Reckley (NRC)
D. B. Spitzberg (NRC) 1 I
--