ML20035F224
| ML20035F224 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200001 |
| Issue date: | 04/06/1993 |
| From: | Fox J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Poslusny C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20035F225 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9304210050 | |
| Download: ML20035F224 (3) | |
Text
_
)
GENuclearErtergy I
ae v ai n m cair n 15 CJ/f*lel AsMasf Sd7 h. sit C4 f1316
=!
i i
April 6,1993 Docket No. STN 52-001 r
t i
i l
Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Standardization Project Directorate Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors.
i and License Renewal Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation I
Subject:
Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Review Schedule - Additional j
EOPs Dear Chet-
+
l i
Enclosed are copies of GE Engineermg Operating Procedure EOP 40-7.00,42si.00 and 42-10.00 requested by Mike Janus. Rese EOPs are referenced in EOP 40-3.00 provided in my April 5, 1993 letter which is being used in conjunction with the resolution of Confirmatory Item 15.1-1.
t Please provide a copy of this transmittal to Mike Janus.
[
Sincerely, j
i 4
b o
t Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs cc: Norman Fletcher (DOE)
PhilNevak (GE) 200033
{
mm
)1 7%w+'
3
~.
~..
- -.. ~.
(
i i
EOP 40-7.00 Revision 7.
t l
CHANGE NOTICE A DESIGN REVIEWS Date Effective - February 24, 1992 i
This notice constitutes a change to the subject 501'. _ The changes described may be incorporated into a subsequent EOP revision without further coordination if f'
~
no adverse comments are received by the EOP Procedure Coordinator (M/C 260) within 60 days after the effectivity date specified above.
j 1.
Change paragraph 2.4 to. read as follows:
As appropriate, design reviews are used to verify that product designs f
meet functional, contractual, safety, health, environmental, regulatory, j
industry codes and standards, and Company requirements.
i l
Change paragraph A4.2 to" read as follows:
I In addition, design reviews are appropriate in cases where there is high technical risk, regulatory sensitivity, potential for adverse environmental, health or safety impact (particularly for new products).
l and/or financial impact. The principal factors which influence this judgement are:
I a.
Significant departures from proven designs b.
Significantly different applications for a known design c.
New technology d.
Significantly reduced margins i
e.
Several engiwering disciplines are involved f.
Complex interfaces with other design' areas g.
Regulatory requirements for design verification h.
High implementation costs 1.
long term or large resource commitment j.
Large Warranty or liability risk 3.
Chaa08 Paragraph A9.1(2) to read as follows:
(2)
The design neeets its requirements and therefore will perform its intended function, including ~ safety, health, environmental, reliability, operability, maintainability, licensability, interface j
compatibility, etc. ~ considerations, and
)
Page 1.of 2 l
i
b EOP 40-7.00 Revicior. 7 Change Notice A Effective 2/24/92 1
l
)
4.
Re-number paragraph B7 as "B9".
i 5.
Add a new paragraph B7 as follows:
"B7 Environmental. Health or Safety Tenact a.
Does the design or design change create or increase the potential for adverse environmental, health or safety impact?
b.
Can a change in the design decrease the potential for adverse impact or create positive impact?"
l l
I lltl9y M. Gecox E0P PROCEDURE COORDINATOR i
i 62& %
&a[
<ha,.
. Larrew D. W. Reigel
'AGER, PRODUCT QUALITY ASSURANCE EOP COUNSEL 1
1 i
[
Page 2 of 2 i
l
_.