ML20034F660
| ML20034F660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1993 |
| From: | Repka D PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO., WINSTON & STRAWN |
| To: | Bechhoefer C, Kline J, Shon F Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#193-13658 OLA-2, NUDOCS 9303040095 | |
| Download: ML20034F660 (2) | |
Text
..
~
c
- 7 n
}.345%
m WINSTON & STILM aw
- hkC I e=EDEncr n MNsTCN stes3 $sesi
'400 L STREET N.W.'
cscAGo orect
%.4 H,s*naww oc98'9*C AASHINGTON DC. 20005 3502 -
- g} {Cg 23 f ] M.cco ius.o ".e WW W^CER 4-i w
g a
l mori3Tosroo
. [.c - t J bt' NEW v0f*K OF8ct '
l1,
,f
" " "C2"5*
Uw
,m,,
"5 wenn s'aECT '
ao,n..o.. m o u v...
.. ;., p usw vonn av tocase (202) 371-5726
- 2' 2"'5"
-i
]
February 24, 1993 Y
BY FACSIMILE Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman Frederick J.
Shon-Administrative Judge Administrative Judge' q
Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing l'
Board Board U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington,'DC 20555
.l Jerry R. Kline Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.. Nuclear Regulatory t
Commission Washington, DC 20555.
i Re:
Pacific' Gas and Electric Co.-(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units-1 and 2),. Docket' ~ Nos. ; 50-275-OLA. 50-323-OLAi(Construction Period Recapture)
\\ :
~
Dear Administrative Judges:
Today I received a telephone call from Ms.:Jili W a k on 1
behalf of the San Luis Obispo' Mothers forcPeace.
Ms..Zamek was a
calling to request more time ~ (7 ' days) to. respond to " Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Preliminary-Response to Discovery Request Filed Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2. 741 (a) (2 ) and Motion for~ProtectiveJ l
Order," dated February.12, 1993
(" Motion")..
. In. accordance ? with, l
10 C.F.R.
SS 2.710 ' and 2.730, an answer to the Motion ~ fromL the.
Mothers'for Peace would be due today.
l
-i In response to Ms. Zamek's request,'I-informed her'.that!
l
'PG&E cannot unilaterally grant more time-to. respond to a-motion.
Rather,-a request to1the Licensing Board would be appropriate.
Nonetheless, I stated that PG&E would not oppose a -request ' for.
seven-more days in which to respond to the Motion.
'I also: stated.
j that Ms. Zamek-should inform counsel for - the NRC: Staff of the
(;
request =for more time.
j i
9303040095 930224 n-h-
f lgDR-ADOCK 05000275
'h i
PDR:
. y_^
i
^
WINSTON & STILiWN i
February 24, 1993 Page 2 i
This letter is to confirm to the Licensing Board that PG&E does not oppose a request for more time to respond to the pending Motion.
PG&E also wishes to inform the Licensing Board that it has asked the Mothers for Peace to set a date for the requested site visit.. A date of March 22, 1993 has been mentioned, although not yet confirmed.
In this context, notwithstanding our position on the request for more time, PG&E respectfully requests a prompt Licensing Board ruling on the Motion (assuming the Mothers for i
Peace request more time and the request is granted).
A clear Licensing Board indication of the scope of the discovery permitted during the site visit, in advance of the visit, would obviously facilitate cooperation.
- Moreover, PG&E wishes to avoid any' lingering dispute on this matter that might jeopardize completion l
of the requested discovery by the April 12, 1993 date previously j
set by the Licensing Board.
See Memorandum and Order (Discovery.
i and Hearing Schedules), February 9, 1993, at 4, 1 2.
Very truly yours, v\\
\\E David A. Re ka Counsel for Pacific Gas &
Electric Company cc:
Service List i
t i
a f
i i
i.
.