ML20034B699

Rev 58 to QA Program for Nuclear Generating Stations

ML20034B699
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden, Byron, Braidwood, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle
Issue date:	04/12/1990
From:	COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20034B691	List: ML20034B690 ML20034B699
References
CE-1-A, CE-1-A-R58, NUDOCS 9004300212
Download: ML20034B699 (13)

Text

e -

1 CE-1-A Topical Report January 1976 Rev. 58 12-90 t

I L

i COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIONS b

l

?

L f

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY

\\

Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illino!!s 60690 f-I k

P

\\

I APPENDIX A

?

OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL INDEX I

i o

Preface l

o Introduction f

o ASME Code Interface 4

ODefinttions i

Qutllty_Rtgutrements 1.0 Organization 2.0 Qualtty Assurance Program 3.0 Design Control i

4.0 Procurement Document Control 5.0 Instructions, Procedures and Drawings 6.0 Document Control 7.0 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment and Services 8.0 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and Components 9.0 Control of Special Processes 10.0 Inspection 11.0TestCoEtrol i

12.0 Controlof Measuring and Test Equipment 13.0 Handling, Storage and Shipping 14.0 Inspection, Test and Operation Status A-1 Rev. 58 4-12-90 a

Ogality Requirements 15.0 Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components 16.0 Corrective-Action 17.0 Quality Assurance Records i

18.0 Audits o

Appendix B, 10CFR50, " Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants" i

0 Station Quality Assurance Manual for Construction, Maintenance, Modification. In Service Inspection and Stores Activities QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES MANUAL INDEX (ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION)

L Quality Proceduret

.t 2-1 Procedure for Revision of the Quality Assurance Manual 2-2 Training of Personnel to Meet Quality Assurance Requirements 3-1 Design Control and Maintenance and Modifications Control 3-2 Design Change Control 3-3 Classification of Systems, Components, Parts and Materials 41 Request for Bid, Proposal Evaluation and Recommendation 4-2 Evaluation of Vendor's Quality Assurance Program 1

5-1 Quality Instructions and Procedures s

6-1 Distributton of Design Documents 6-2 Procedure for Engineering and Construction Department and Substatlon Construction Department Design Document Control 7-1 Control of Procured Material and Equipment - Receiving and Inspection 7-2 Off-Site Contractor Inspection A-2 i

Rev. 58 l

4-12-90 t

}

l t

l LISTING COVERING REVISION OF i

TOPICAL REPORT CE-1-A i

l Below is a listing of Revision 58 changes to the i

l Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Program Topical Report CE-1-A dated 4/12/90:

I Rev. Content Pages 2-1, 16-1 and 16-2 (16-3 revised

.i only for revision number).

i Approved:

+//2 /10 i

nager of Quality Assurance /

Nuclear Safety

, 4/12/90 9518N I

b

CONTENTS TITLE EME REY.

DATE INTRODUCTION 1 56 09/13/89

1. ORGANIZATION -

A. Basic Organization Responsibilities 1-1 56 09/13/89 1-2 57 12/01/89

8. Organizational Responsiblittles for Major Activltles 1-3 56 09/13/89 1-4 56 09/13/89 1-5 55 03/27/89 1-6 55 03/27/89 1-7 55 03/27/89 1-8 55 03/27/89 1-9 55 03/27/89 i

1-10 57 12/01/89' 1

1-11 55 03/27/89 1-12 57 12/01/89 1-13 56 09/13/89 1-14 56 09/13/89 1-15 56 09/13/89 1-16 56 09/13/89 1-17 56 09/13/89 1-18 56 09/13/89 1-19 56 09/13/89 1-20 56 09/13/89 1-21 56 09/13/89 t

1-22 56 09/13/89 1-23 56 09/13/89 1-24 56 09/13/89 t

1-25 56 09/13/89 1-26 56 09/13/89 1-27 56 09/13/89 i

i 1-28 56 09/13/89 1-29 56 09/13/89 1-30 56 09/13/89 1-31 56 09/13/89 i

1-32 56 09/13/89 1-33 56-09/13/89 1-34 56 09/13/89 1-35 56 09/13/89 1-36 56 09/13/89 1-37 56 09/13/89 1-38 56 09/13/89 1-39 56 09/13/89 1-40 56 09/13/89 1-41 57 12/01/89 1-42 57 12/01/89 Page._1_ of 4 Date:

4-12-90 Rev. 1B

CONTENTS TITLE EAGE REY.

DATE FIGURES i

1-0 Organization Chart Related To Q. A.

1-43 57 12/01/89 1-1 Organization Chart - Quality Assurance /

1-44 57 12/01/89 4

Nuclear Safety Policy and Oversight Dept.

1-1-1 Quality Programs and Assessment Department 1-45 57 12/01/89 1-2 Engineering and Construction Department 1-46 57 12/01/89 1-3 Projects Organization and Nuclear 1-47 57 12/01/89 Engineering Department i

i 1-4 Projects Department (For Future Project -

1-48 57 12/01/89 Currently Inactive) 1-5 System Operational Analysis Department 1-49 57 12/01/89 and System Materials Analysis Department 1-7 Station Production Department Organization 1-50 57 12/01/89

2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 2-1 58 04/12/90 2-2 51 07/07/88

+

2-3 57 12/01/89 2-4 55 03/27/89

+

2-5 55 03/27/89 2-6 57 12/01/89 7

2-7 57 12/01/89 2-8 55 03/27/89

3. DESIGN CONTROL 3-1 55 03/27/89 3-2 57 12/01/89 3-3 55 03/27/89 3-4 56 09/13/89

4. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 4-1 57 12/01/89 4-2 57 12/01/89 4-3 56 09/13/89 i

4-4 57 12/01/89 4-5 57 12/01/89

5. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 5-1 57 12/01/89 5-2 55 03/27/89 5-3 0

01/76

6. DOCUMENT CONTROL 6-1 57 12/01/89 6-2 57 12/01/89 6-3 55 03/27/89 Page _2_ of 4 Date:

4-12-90 Rev. 18 1

t u-~

CONTENTS TITLE EAGE

REY, DATE

7. CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT I

AND SERVICES --

7-1 57 12/01/89 i

7-2 56 09/13/89 7-3 56 09/13/89 7-4 56 09/13/89

+

7-5 55 03/27/89 l

7-6 55 03/27/89

8. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 8-1 56 09/13/89 8-2 55 03/27/89

9. CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 9-1 56 09/13/89 9-2 57 12/01/89 i

9-3 55 03/27/89

10. INSPECTION 10-1 57 12/01/89 10-2 55 03/27/89 10-3 33 03/13/85

11. TEST CONTROL 11-l' 57 12/01/89 11-2 55 03/27/89 11-3 55 03/27/89 11-4 55 03/27/89

12. CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 12-1 57 12/01/89 12-2 55 03/27/89 12-3 57

'12/01/59

13. HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING 13-1 26 12/10/83 13-2 55 03/27/89 13-3 55 03/27/89

14. INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS 14-1 55

.03/27/89 I

14-2 26 06/19/85

15. NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS OPERATIONS 15-1 57 12/01/89 l

15-2 55 03/27/89 15-3 57 12/01/89

16. CORRECTIVE ACTION 16-1 58 04/12/90 r

16-2 58 04/12/90 16-3 58 04/12/90

17. QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 17-1 57 12/01/89 17-2 55 03/27/89 Page _1_ of 4 Date:

4-12-90 Rev. 51

CONTENTS i

TITLE MGE REY.

.__DAIL

18. AUDITS 18-1 56 09/13/89 18-2 57 12/01/89

~

18-3 56 09/13/89

^

APPENDIX.A Quality Assurance Program Manual Index A-1 45 06/30/87 Quallty Assurance Procedures Manual A-2 56 09/13/89 Index (Engineering and Construction)

Quality Assurance Procedures Manual A-3 56 09/13/89 i

In6er (Operations)

A-4 50 04/08/88 A-5 56 09/13/89 4

Approved:

2

+ //a d o ManagerofQualityAssurance/

(/

Nuclear Safety 1

?

(

r x

Page

_4__ of _i_ Date:

4-12-90 Rev. 18 9522M 5

EXPLANATION OF CHANGES FOR TOPICAL REPORT - REV. 58 5

CQtMQNigALTH EDlEON COMPANY PROGRAM T.QIlCAL_ ret 0RT CE-1-3 PAGE NO.

EXPLANATION Rev. Coutent Pages 1-48 These revisions are being made to Pages 2-1, 16-1, 16-2, correct a typographical error, reflect and 16-3.

the correct frequency of cumulative deviation reporting, and to clarify the applicability of other ANSI N45.2 Standards not endorsed by NQA-1 (the last item is at the request of the Region III reviewer).

L i

?

0012M

{

?

?

b f

I t

T 4

2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 2.1 General.

The Commonwealth Edison Company has extentive experience with the development, scheduling, design, constri.'etion and operation of electric generating facilities.

It has pioneered in commercial nue. lear power. Commonwealth Edison Company and its consultants and vendors have established designs and specifications for compliance with applicable regulations, ASME Code and National Standartis to assure installations of utmost safety and reliability.

Commonwealth Edison Company has attained qualified equipment vendors and contractors through experience, evaluation at vendor plants and site surveillance during plant erection.

These efforts provide assurance that compliance with applicable design specifications and codes is maintained and a high level of reliability is achieved.

2,2 Poliev It is the policy of Commonwealth Edison Company to assure a high degree of functional integrity of the equipment, structures and safety-related systems of its nuclear generating facilities, the performance of which are essential to the prevention of nuclear accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public, or to the mitigation of the consequences of such accidents in the unlikely event they should occur.

These_ systems, equipment, and structures will be identified, designed, fabricated, erected, tested and operated to the criteria and requirements of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Sections III and XI, as referenced in the SAR applicable to a specifit unit at the time of engineering, construction and major modificat16ns, Appendix B to 10CFR50, Subpart H to 10CFR71, Regulatory Guide 1.28 Rev. 3, dated 8/85 and the mandatory requirements of ANSI /ASME NQA-1-1986 and the ANSI N45.2 Standards not covered by ANSI /ASME NQA-1 with the provision that CECO suppliers / vendors maintain a quality assurance program which satisfies ANSI /ASME, NQA-1-1986, ANSI-N45.2 Standards not covered by ANSI /ASME NQA-1, and N18.7 Standards (or the ANSI /ASME N45.2 series of standards for previously accepted non-ASME quality programs).

The commitments to Regulatory Guides and Standards shall apply to each respective s,tation as listed below.

Also', Commonwealth Edison commits to comply with 10CFR Part 21

" Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance" and with the Regulatory position of the following Regulatory Guides and the requirements of the following ANSI Standards as listed for each station.

2-1 Rev. 58 4-12-90 CommonweaMh Ioleon

W p+

l 16.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION A

A corrective action system will.be used to assure that.

i such items as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, nonconformances and programmatic y

L deficiencies which are adverse to quality and might affect the safe operation of.a nuclear generating station.are promptly.

Identified and-corrected.

Corrective action measures for nonconformances are

+

included in the design, source fabrication and on-site construc-tion, erection and operational phases. Corrective action measures involving design will.be processed as design change requests.

Corrective action measures in the source fabrication. phase are requiredinthequalityassurange'programsofindividualvendors l

Including the NSSS Supplier,

.f Forconstructionunde[takenbyProjectsEngineeringand for modifications installed under the direction of Engineering and Construction, on-site corrective action measures shall consist of a program'for: '(1) reporting nonconformances to Engineering by i

Construction; (2) recording nonconformance reports (NCR's)'in a log for follow-up by Quality. Assurance as;to rese'ation and satisfactory completion;.(3) prompt resolution an! o proval'of corrective actions by Engineering; (4) assurance t; Construction c

that the corrective action has been taken;-(5) sign-off approval.

and close-out of NCR's by Site Quality Assurance that' satisfactory' corrective action has been taken; and (6) issuance by Engineering of monthly reports indicating the status of all NCR's submitted for resolution.

Implementation of corrective action wil1<be accomplished at the source of deficiency by appropriate contractor' personnel as found necessary by the contractors or as directed by cognizant

' Edison engineers.

Projects Construction or Engineering and Construction, as applicable, has responsibill_ty for implementation of the correction. Quality Assurance is. responsible for follow-up and final approval that the nonconformances have been corrected satisfactorily.-

s s

For corrective. action nonconformances, the Edison Site Quality. Assurance Superintendent or designee will establish and maintain a Nonconformance Report (NCR) Station Log to monitor the prompt resolution and closing of all NCR's plus maintain a file of l

all NCR's.or equivalent documents that are submitted by the site

.l for Commonwealth Edison Company resolution and approval.

16-1 Rev. 58 04-12-90 Commonwealth Edison i

f The cumulative quarterly deviation report, which indicates l

[

the NCR number, deviation description and resolution, such as reject, replace, use-as-is or repair,: approval status, date of resolution and whether corrective. action is-completed. Is I

distributed to involved corporate and line management for Information,-review and possible action.

The responsible manager brings significant nonconformances to the attention of corporate management for action where satisfactory resolution _cannot be.

achieved by Engineering with a contractor.

For Operations, corrective action identified from

-nonconformances, incidents and deviations, trend studies and audits are verifted for satisfactory completion to preclude repetition.

When corrective' action is required to correct' nonconformance to Code requirements, such corrective action shall be made available to the Authorized Nuclear Inspector.

Any revision to-Travelers or other process control documents involved with corrective action related to nonconformance for station.

modifications-shall be reviewed with the Authorized Nuclear Inspector for his review and insertion of hold points.

~

The Technical Staff Supervisor verifles completion of corrective actions for maintenance,: repair, refueling ~and operation-activities.

The Station Quality Assurance Superintendents, or designees, issue reports indicating 'the status of corrective action in progress.

These reports are routed to the Vice Presidents (BNR and PHR Operations), the Nuclear Quality Programs Manager, and the Manager of Quality Assurance / Nuclear Safety and reviewed to ensure prompt implementation of the corrective action.

This system will-provide follow-up t'o assure that-corrective measures are effectively implemented. Also, significant:

conditions are reported by the responsible manager and nonconforming items are routinely reported to appropriate levels of management.-

Site contractors and off-site vendors will be required'to follow-up on corrective action commitments within their quality _

program.

The Site Quality Assurance Superintendent or designee will be responsible for surveillance of site corrective action.

The Projects Department Project Manager is responsible for assuring that review and evaluation of nonconformance reports are carried out to determine the need of corrective action. Quality Assurance is-responsible to track and verify completion of corrective action taken for audit deficiencies including programmatic deficiencies identified in audits.

16-2 Rev. 58 l

04-12-90 i

Commonwealth Edleen

,e Required corrective. action during Statl'on operation which is due to equi.pment malfunctions and/ or abnormal occurrences will be incorporated into the station maintenance and operating procedures in a timely manner to preclude repetition.

The responsible Quality Assurance Engineer or Inspector assigned to the station verifies and approves the completion of corrective actions by the station.

Deficiencies in implementing corrective actions will be brought to the attention of appropriate management levels for resolution.

4 5

16-3 Rev. 58 04-12-90 Commonwealth Edison J