ML20034A072

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 900228 Response to NRC 891228 Request for Info Re Planned Actions for Training Technical Staff,Per Insp Rept 50-458/89-42.Rev & Implementation of Procedure EDP-AA-10 Will Be Reviewed During Future Insp
ML20034A072
Person / Time
Site: River Bend 
Issue date: 04/05/1990
From: Collins S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Deddens J
GULF STATES UTILITIES CO.
References
NUDOCS 9004190273
Download: ML20034A072 (3)


See also: IR 05000458/1989042

Text

m

....

. - - -

- -

,

,

,,

- -

- - -

..

.

_ . . . _ _ _ .

.

js:

--]:3 '

.

-

,w,

.

.

p - 51990 -

-

.

,

-

..

.

!py

._

.

.

.

.in Reply: Refer To:

Docket:-_ 50-458/89-42

4

%'

.4,

' Gulf States Utilities

ATTN: , James C. Deddens1

3

~ Senior Vice Presidenc (RBNG)

P.O. Box 220;

u

,

St. Francisville,' Louisiana. 70775

'

,

Gentlemen:"

Thank you for your letter of February 28', 1990, in:-response to:the;

-request for information contained in'our.-letter dated December 28, 1989,-

l

"

concerning planned actions for training ofatechnical staff. We)have riviewed-

your reply and find it responsive to the issues identified in our inspection

L

report on'this subject. -We will review the revision to Procedure EDP-AA-10k

m

and.its implementation during a future inspection,

i

!

Sincerely,

j

. Original Signod By:

i

Samuel-J. Collins

>

.- i

'

"

. Samuel J. Collins,' Director

e

Division of Reactor Projects

j

,CC:

Gulf States Utilities Company

-ATTN:

J. 1. Booker, Manager-

.

Ri:er Bend Oversight

P.O. Box:2951

.!

Beaumont, Texas 77704

' Conner and Wetterhahn

'ATTN: Troy B. Conner, Jr. , Esq.

1747' Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.

Washington, D.C.

20006-

'

,.

3

Gulf States. Utilities Company

ATTN: Les England, Director

1

Nuc1 car Licensing

1

P.O. Box 220

i

~St. Francisville,: Louisiana 70775

,

D:dLJCallan[

RI

KS,

C:h

D

- 1 Gilbert /lb

Barnes

lins

I

A/A/90

%/4/90

'A/(/90

0

/

.

.

.

3 "'

9004190273 900405

-

'<

'

V

PDR

ADOCN 05000458

\\ \\;

,

O

PDC

'

I

./

,

pp(g

'

'

g

iU

j > fd

a

,

_ . _ . . . . . , _ . . . . . . . _ . - . . . ... . . . . . . .

.

.

.. .... ..

.

.

..

.

.. - .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

...7,.......

,

,

1

- ,;

g-

-

.

.

'

'

..

. Gulf).StatesUtilities-

,-2-

,

- Richard M. Troy, Jr., Esq.

Assistant Attorney General-in. Charge

State of Louisiana Department of Justice-

234 Loyola Avenue

New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

'

Mr. J.-David McNeill, III.

Willi n G. Davis, Esq.

,

Depa*tment of Justice

Attorney General's Office:

'

g

P.O. Box 94095

Baton Rouge, Louisiana- 70804-9095

y

-

---

H.. Anne Plettinger.

3456 Villa Rose Drive

Baton Rouge, Louisiana:-70806

-

President of West Feliciana

'

Police Jury

d

.P.O. Box 1921-

.

!

-

i

St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775

i

!

"

Cajun Electric. Power Coop. Inc.

ATTN: . Philip G. Harris-

.

~(

1

10719 Airline-Highway

-!

.

-

-

P.O. Box 15540

!

-

e

LBaton Rouge, Louisiana '70895

l

D

i

Department of Environmental Quality

'

ATTN: William H. Spell, Administrator

. Nuclear Energy' Division ^

j

P.O. Box 14690

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70898

.]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

!

_

ATTN: -Resident Inspector

!

P.O. Box 1051-

,

St.:Francisville, Louisiana. 70775-

1

-

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region IV

1

g

~

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

,,

Arlington,iTexas 76011

1

y

't

e

i

j

'

i

'

-

1, / '

'

w-

'

,

m

,

E

' h' .I y

'

c

M,

-

,

Qff-

'#'

_]

,

-

> ^

-

. ::

.

,

,,

,

<

,

6

'

. .

,

Gulf States Utilities

3-i

-

"

-

bectoDMB--(IE01)

"-

,

_

bec distrib. by RIV:

_

'

R. D.. Martin

Resident lnspec+ r

DRP

'

SectionChief(f.*d/C)

.*

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF

HIS System--

-l

DRSS-FRPS

- RSTS Operator-

si

. ProjectEngineer(DRP/C)

- RIV File

l

DRS .

Senior Resident Inspector, Cooper

,

Senior Resident Inspector, Fort Calhoun

W.Paulson,NRRProjectManager(MS:

13-D-18)'

DRS.

L. Gilbert'

I. Barnes

)

1

q

i

!

!

~!

-

1

i

-i

!

l

!

l

)

-I

l

'

l

1

~ $

J

i

t

-y

.

. , .

.- .-

-

. ...

,

-.

.

?

]

<

,ee..

<. ..

,

-

x

.

,

.

COMPANY.{: , . g;(I

!!)

&.

_

_

V

GULF STATES ' UTILETIES

'

c . . .n c i o o e . w i M

M h-

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

.vsn uo rwm

w :m asa m

(

y

sancm v.

m:

'

m .m .

.

_

.

_i'

-

l

February 28. 1990

--

" ~ ~ '

RBG- $2408 .

File Nos. G9.5,.G15.4.1

.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

Document Control Desk

' Washington, D.C.

20555-

-

Gentlemen:

,

River Bend Station.- Unit 1

Refer to: Region'IV

Docket No. 50-458/89-42

<

u

This letter provides Gulf -States Utilities Company's (GSU); response to an _

'

inspector follow-up item noted in NRC Inspection Report :No.

50-458/89-42.

-

The inspection _was perfonned by Messrs. Barnes, Gilbert. and Stewart during

the period of November 13-17,-1989 authorized by NRC-Operating License NPF-47;

for River Bend Station' - Unit _ 1.

.GSU'st response' is .provided in the

'

-

attachment. This completes GSU's response to this item.

i

Should you have any questions, please : contact- Mr._ L.

A.

England- at

~

(504)381-4145.

Sincerely,

-

H.

e1

Manager-River Bend =0versight

"

<

River Bend Nuclear Group

WH0/U L/D. / WC/DEf/ch

Attachment

.

cc:

U. S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission

,

l

Region'IV

L

611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite _1000-

Arlington, TX 76011

.

1

j.'

. Senior Reside 1t Inspector

'

-

Post' Office Box 1051

l

L

St. Francisville, LA 70775

'

,

w

. . .

-

M*W

.

..

.

-

.

- .--

- - _ _ _

_

_ - - _ _ - _ - _ .

- - _ . - _ - - _ -

.

_.

-

l

."

u.

.

..

.

'

ATTACMENT

-

.

,

'

RESPONSE TO INSPECTOR FOLLOW-UP ITEM 50-458/8942-02

y

l

REFERENCES

,

l~

Letter - S. J. Collins letter to J. C. Deddens, dated December 28, 1989.

l

DESCRIPTION

4

The NRC inspection report indicated that current procedural requirements for

training of technical

staff are not being fully implemented-'and that

u

weaknesses exist-in administrative controls for verification of completion of-

specified. training.

GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY'S RESPONSE

Issuance of Master Training Matrix-

'

\\

The requirement in procedure EDP-AA-10 to issue .the trainingcmatrix on- a

semiannual basis.was known and revision to the procedure deleting the matrix

was planned. However, with the' methods of tracking completion of training,

revision was delayed.

The revision presently in review, eliminates the

requirement for the Master Training Matrix, as the requirements contained

_

-

therein are identified in other, topic-specific procedures.

'

!

Completion of Rereading and Required-Procedure-Training

The problems dealing with completion of required reading activities and

specific procedure training were . aggravated by

' deficiencies.

in-

the

capabilities of the computerized training records system. This system was

-

not capable of producing x-y matrices for ready identification of personnel

,

needing a particular training activity.

GSU has.obtained the programming

assistance of the' corporate computer applications department and

has

developed x-y plot capability for the training records system. Lists of

,

required /recomended training are currently being reviewed for inclusion of

c

critical

items into .a x-y matrix for engir.eering personnel. Such:a matrix'

will allow engineering supervision to rapidly and easily determine where_ and'

when any additional training should occur.

The revision. in process to EDP-AA-10 will

remove the 2-year rereading

requirement, as ongoing use of the procedures on the list will ensure review

3

of new revisions.

It will also reflect the individualization of required

reading _ lists to cover the anticipated job duties of the individual.- GSU, in

concert with corporate computer applications personnel, will evaluate the

development of x-y matrix capabilities for required reading records to

4

provide further capabilities for supervisory review of required reading.

!

,

Page 1 of 2

-

+

-

_ _ _ - _ - - _

__-

i

1,.

.

,.

I It;[ is important to note that the. completion of the matrix will neither-

' -

-

qualify or disqualify an' engineer for any' particular activity.

Under the

i

ANSI standards committed-to by RBS, the supervisor makes the determination as

'-

to the ability of an individual to perform work, with. the minimum training

'

partly dictated by the individuals past training, education and experience,

as well as the duties assigned to the individual. He should,- however, have

completed all required courses.

Virtually all

activities performed by

engineering personnel also involve review by an independent reviewer and/or

-

the individual's supervisor. Modification Request-related documents are also

reviewed for procedural conipliance by the Engineering and Office Services

Group.

Retraining Requirements for 10CFR50.59 Evaluations

River Bend Engineering has adopted the 10CFR50.59 guidelines contained in

,,

EPRI-NUMARC publication-NSAC-125.- The information contained within NSAC-125

is the best guidance available to the industry on the performance of these

1

evaluations.

Prior to the inspector's visit, NSAC-125 was distributed as

1

required reading to. 10CFR50.59 preparers.

It is ir. tended that reading of

'

NSAC-1?S will suffice as the annual

training requirement for. 10CFR50.59

evaluations.

Engineering procedure EDP-AA-62 is ready for issue, requiring

completion of this reading as a prerequisite: to performance of 10CFR50.59

evaluations.

In addition, GSU is evaluating the need-for continued wholesale

annual 10CFR50.59 retraining requirements for personnel.

Summary

Training requirements for engineering department personnel are currently

under

revision,

and

since

the-

supervisor makes the qualification

determinations, additional interim actions are not considered necessary until

,

,

procedure EDP-AA-10 is revised.

Weaknesses in- the engineering training-

'

tracking system have been partially addressed, with- further improvements

pending.

These changes will have a dramatic impact on the ability to verify

training and to assist supervisory personnel in the determination of need for

-

additional

training.

In addition, procedures are being revised to reflect

,

'

changes in the training process, to eliminate unnecessary requirements and to

-

reflect appropriate, efficient methods for providing training and required

reading for individuals.

<

l

t

!

'

!

q

l

j

Page'2 of 2

!