ML20033F834
| ML20033F834 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/28/1990 |
| From: | Morgan H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9004030231 | |
| Download: ML20033F834 (2) | |
Text
$,
l e
)
(
y'-
1, 1
i
,l
[
Southem Califomla Edison Company 1
y,I
/
S AN ONOFRE NUCLE AR GENERATING ST ATION k;i P. O BOX 128.
h SAN CLEMENTE. CALIFORNIA 92672 b
.H E. MORGAN TE LEPHONC.
9 0%, m..E.
m.,........
3 MAR 2 81990 i
-y U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:' Document Control Desk f
. Washington,.D.-C.
20555 j
Gentlemen:
Subject:
~
Docket lNos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 10 CFR 50.54(p) Changes.
Temporary Unescorted Access Authorization Physical Security Plan, Revision 27
. San Onofre: Nuclear Generating Station j
L Units 1, 2 and 3
REFERENCES:
1).
June 12.-1987.NRC. Generic Letter 87-10,
Subject:
i Implementation of 10 CFR 73.57,. Requirements for FBI.
a
. Criminal. History Checks p-2)
March 2,1990 letter, C. M. Trammell (NRC) to W. F. Conway (Arizona: Public Service Company),. 5ubject: 10 CFR 50.54(p).
Approval of Changes Submitted Regarding'the Program for Temporary Unescorted Access This letter provides proposed Revision 27 to the August:1983 " Physical Security-Plan, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3," for NRC review.and approval'under 10 CFR 50.54(p)'.
Screening criteria developed by NUMARC in coordination with the NRC staff are proposed to grant temporary unescorted access to San Onofre protected and vital areas., The. proposed temporary: access screening criteria are from the NUMARC Industry Guidelines Revision 8B, Section 6.4, dated June' 22, 1989.
. Southern California Edison (SCE) currently uses the authority from NRC Generic Letter 87-10, Reference 1, to grant temporary unescorted access to San Onofre protected and vital areas.
Hiis temporary access authorization is contingent upon submittal of fingerpt int to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 73.57 and maintenance of all existing security plan commitments pertaining to individual screening.
r) 4 $4W 9004030231 900328
[22
-'PDR ADOCK 05000206
'd
-E
-PDC I
4 54 uocument Control _ Desk 2-gApgg)ggg The NRC recently ap3 roved the screening criteria proposed in the enclosure as a 10 CFR 50.54(p) c1ange to the Palo Verde security plan by Reference 2.
Therefore, SCE is requesting this change to make our criteria consistent with current industry policy and practice. This change will not be distributeo to manual holders, or implemented, until. approval is received from the NRC.
Accordingly, enclosed are four copies of Revision 27, plan textual changes, for review. Two copies are also forwarded by this letter to the Regional Administrator, NRC, Region V.
These pages have been " Decontrolled" for review purposes because the affected pages do not contain Safeguards Information.
The changes described in the enclosure and its attachments do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of this plan.
, - Sincerely,
-[
f t
hl' /*
O Enclosure cc:
E. W. McPeek, Security Specialist, NRC Headquarters, Washington, D. C.
J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator, NRC Region V (2 copies)
L. E. Kokajko, NRC Project Manager San Onofre Units 2 and 3, NRC Headquarters, Washington, D. C.
C. W. Caldwell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector (Acting), San Onofre Units 1, 2 and 3 f
5.
-.