ML20033E404
| ML20033E404 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/1990 |
| From: | William Cahill, Walker R TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| GL-90-01, GL-90-1, TXX-90082, NUDOCS 9003120656 | |
| Download: ML20033E404 (12) | |
Text
_
4, o ig E%"e"mm"e.
2M Log # TXX-90082
[-,
File # 10035 Generic Letter 90 01 nlELECTRIC March 1, 1990 N,$"/AN,'A, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.
20555
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)
DOCKET NOS. 50 445 AND 50 446 RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 90 01:
" REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION IN NRC REGULATORY IMPACT SURVEY" Gentlemen:
In Generic Letter 90 01, the NRC requested utility support in providing information regarding the impact of NRC imposed inspections, audits and evaluation on utility operations and resources.
Under NUMARC's direction, self assessment activities, including INPO Assist visits, which are conducted to enhance plant performance have not been included. There are numerous self-initiated evaluations conducted annually to improve quality, plant performance and operations which do not result from external commitments.
Attached is TU Electric's response to the NRC impact survey questionnaire.
If additional information is required, please contact Veronica Cornell at (214) 812-8886.
Sincerely, G O'Ibb <t m f & h ) %
William J. Cahill, Jr.
By:
W 1 b ' D' Roger D. Walker Manager, Nuclear Licensing VPC/vid Attachment c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3) 1 9003120656 900301 PDR ADOCK 05000445
/h g
{/p i
p PDC t
400 North Olive Street L.B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 L
i Attachment to TXX+90082 i
Page 1 of Il NRC ReQulotory Impact Survey d
Ques ;ionnaire Sheet 1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
NRC Team f aspections (NTOL's)
Information based on inspections conducted within one year orior to OL (2/89 2/90) 2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?
Acoroximately 32 team inspections and t
associated followup inspections 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
Corrective Action procram (CAP),
Emeroency Operatina proaram (EOP). Operational Readiness Assessment Team (ORAT). Security. Radiolooical Controls. Chemistry / Radio chemistry. Fire Protection Equipment Qualification. Structural Emergency Preparedness.
Augmented Inservice Team and Preservice Inspection 4
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)
CAD - 8 inspectors for 1 week on 3 separate insoettions E0p 8 inspectors for 2 weeks onsite review and 2 weeks offsite review ORAT - 12 insoectors for 2 weeks on 2 separate insoections Balance -
4 inspectors for 1 week 5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, d aing, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.
a.
Plant Department Heads
<5%
(numberinvolved)<5 b.
Plant Manager <5%
c.
Corporate Department Heads <5%
(numberinvolved) 1 d.
Corporate Vice Presidents
<1%
(numberinvolved) 4 e.
Chief Nuclear Officer <1%
I i
i Attachment to TXX 90082 NRC ReQulatory Impact Survey I
Paee 2 of Il Questionnaire sheet 1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
NRC Office of Special Proiects (OSP) l and Region IV Inspections for Design, Construction, Test and Operations
]
2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often 1s this activity conducted?
1 - 5 day (s) inspection per approximately
)
every 2 months 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
2512. 2513, 2514, 2515 procrams, CPSES Corrective Action Procram, Extensive Allegation Followup (s),
i P
4.
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)
OSP over past 3 years 13 inspectors: continuous RIV - over past 2 years 3 inspecto rs; 1-5 day (s) inspection B.
5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.
a.
Plant Department Heads <5%
(number involved) <5 b.
Plant Manager <5%
c.
Corporate De'3rtment Heads <5%
(numberinvolved)_1.__
d.
Corporate Vice Presidents
<1%,
(numberinvolved) 4 e.
Chief Nuclear Officer <1%
e
., Attachment to TXX 90082 NRC Regulatory !monet Survey t-
.Paca 3 of 11 Questionnatre sheet 1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
NRC Resident inspections.
Radiation Protection (RP) 2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Ongoing activity
. 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
4.
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)
NRC Resident activities tveically recuire acerovimately 2 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> eer month of RP Mat /Suev. time.
5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and l-in response to the activity described in Item fl.
a.
Plant Department Heads
<1%
(numberinvolved) 1 b.
Plant Manager __L,25%
c.
Corporate Department Heads (number involved) d.
Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved) e.
Chief Nuclear Officer i
I
'I m
m,.
%.-w..
i
. Attachment to TXX 90082 i'^C Regulatory Imotet Survey
.Page 4 of 31 Questionnaire Sheet 1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
NRC/NRR Inspections on ASME related activities i
4 2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? 2-3 inspections per veer with 2-3 visits for each subject inspection.
3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
ASME Section XI design, repair /
replacement, welding, pressure testing and examinations / inspections.
4.
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)
Typically one NRC inspector per visit, lasting from a minimum of two days to a maximum i
of seven working days.
5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.
l i
a.
Plant Department Heads 3%
(numberinvolved) 2 b.
Plant Manager c.
Corporate Department Heads (numberinvolved) d.
Corporate Vice Presidents 1%
(numberinvolved) 2 e.
Chief Nuclear Officer l
l l
4 Attscheent to TXX 90082 4
.Page 5 of Il NRC Regulatory impact Survey Questionnaire sheet
- c 1.
Type of inspedtion, audit or evaluation:
ANI Fire Protection 2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?
Four onsite inspections per year i
- 3..
Operations / Construction areas covered:
All plant and non-olant areas are inspected and evaluated for effective fire protection and property loss prevention methods, t
4.
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)
ANI Fire Protection inspections typically consist of one senior regional field engineer for 3 work days.
5.
Approximate percen'. age of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.
a.
Plant Department Heads' m (number involved) 1 b.
Plant Manager m c.
Corporate Department Heads 3.21.
(numberinvolved)1 l
d.
Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved) e.
Chief Nuclear Officer P
l 1
l
,e-,
,m....
w
AttachDent to TXX 90082 NRC ReQulatory IGDact Survey Page 6 cf 11 Questionnaire Sheet 1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
ANI Radiation Prottetion i
2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often 1
is this activity conducted?
One ANI inspection per year l
l i
3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
4.
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)
ANI insoections l
t veicall y consist of 1-2 inscections. onsite for 4 work davs 5.
Approximate percentage oi' total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.
a.
Plant Department Heads <1%
(numberinvolved) I b.
Plant Manager <,05%
c.
Corporate Department Heads (numberinvolved) d.
Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved) 4 e.
Chief Nuclear Officer l
, - ~,,
. Attach Ont to TXX 90082 NRC Reculatory Imoact-Survey Page 7 of 11 Questionnaire Sheet i
1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
OSHA i
2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?
Two onsite investications per year 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered: All plant and non-clant areas
]
and activities are subject to industrial safety and health insoections and evaluations.
1 4.
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)
OSHA investigations typically consist of two compliance officers who are onsite for one work week.
5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, curing, and
(
in response to the activity described in Item fl.
a.
Plant Department Heads 0.5%
(numberinvolved) 4 b.
Plant Manager 0.25%
I c.
Corporate Department Heads 2.0%
(numberinvolved) 1 d.
Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved) e.
Chief Nuclear Officer e
b l
l
Attachm:nt to TXX-90082 NRC Regulatory impact Survey Page 8 of 11 Questionnaire Sheet V
1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
State compliance inseection of ASME related activities 2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? 5 inspections or visits per year 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered: Operations: ASME Section XI compliance with respect to Repairs / Replacements, inservice InsDection.
Preservice inspection. Pressure Testina. Desion activities (e.o.. rerates).
Construction, ASME Section III compliance with respect to construction, welding testing and inspection 4.
Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) One to a maximum of 3 state inspectors have been involved in inspections at CP$fS.
These inspections usually last for approxim.ately two workino days.
5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.
a.
Plant Department Heads 2%
(r,umberinvolved) 2 b.
Plant Manager c.
Corporate Department Heads (numberinvolved) d.
Corporate Vice Presidents 1%
(numberinvolved) 2 e.
Chief Nuclear Officer l
~
7 Attachm3nt to TXX-90082 Page 9 of Il NRC Reevlanory Imoset Survey Quest onnatre sneet
)
1.
Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:
Authorized Inseettion Acency Audit Re: ANSI N626 i
2.
Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?
Semiannual 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
ASME Section XI Comoliance.
Authorized Nuclear Inservice Insoection ( ANII) activities i
4 Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) One ANil i
tunervisor and one ANII for two workina days, l
5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.
a.
Plant Department Heads A (numberinvolved) 1 b.
Plant Manager c.
Corporate Department Heads (numberinvolved) l d.
Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved) e.
Chief Nuclear Officer 1
l 1
l
~
o m 40082
.Auecjan m
9
,,C,,,,,a",ory Ismaet surver cu n t< onnaire e t 1.
Type of inspection, aedit or evaluation:
QA Audits mandated by Tech spec and FSAR 2.
Basse On actual experience over the past several y9ars, about how Often 18 this activity CondECted?
33 audits / year - Construction 3b audits / year-Enntenerine 20 audits / veer - Operations 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
_All phases or desian, construction, startue and operations 4.
f,xtentoftheactivity(howmanypeople,forhowlong)
Audits have averatted 45 asa-days each for 2 spost recent years 6
Approximate percentage of total time (on an aaneel basisJ utich the fellowing asnagers aust spend in direct involvement before, during, ana in response to the activity described in Ites #1.
Plant Departaaet Needs i (asuber involved) _ 11 a.
b.
Plant Manager 1 Corporate Department Needs 1 (number involved) 1 c.
d.
Corporate Vies Presidents 2 (number involved) d Chief meslear Officer 1 e.
1
-,8 -
-.'Page 11LeS;11 NRC Regulatory impact Survey
-Questionnaire Sheet
- 1.., Type of inspeckton, audit' or evaluation:
Texas Water Commission site inspection 2.
Based on actual experi m e ove. the past several years, about how often is this activity conduc w lwice per year 3.
Operations / Construction areas covered:
wastewater discharges, hazardous waste and solid waste regulations 4.
Extent of.the activity (how many people, for how long) 1-2 people from district office (usually 1) for 1 day 5.
Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in item #1.
a.-
P_lant Department Heads 1%
(numberinvolved) 1-b.
Plant Manager c.
Corporate Department Heads (numberinvolved) d.
Corp' orate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved) e.-
Chief Nuclear Officer
. -.