ML20033D323
| ML20033D323 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/05/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20033D289 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900338 NUDOCS 8112070528 | |
| Download: ML20033D323 (4) | |
Text
__
Siemens-Allis Incorporated Small Motor Division Docket No. 999003,38/80-01 NOTICE OF DEVIATION Based on the results of an hdC inspection conducted on December 8-12, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC equirements as' indicated below:
A.
Siemens-Allis,' Incorporated, Small Motor Division's corrective action response letter, dated September 25, 1978, states in part:
1.
"Index formulated and issued.
Included in revision of LRN 10.01 and made part of all order folders."
2.
" Checklists, audit report and audit summary formulated and issued.
Included in revision of procedure LRN 8.01."
Note:
The effectivity date of the foregoing had been established as-October 20, 1978.
Contrary to the above:
1.
The index had not been included in the revision of LRN 10.01; further,'LRN 10.01 had not been revised subsequent'to Inspection No. 78-01.
2.
Checklists for conduct of audits, had not been formulated and issued or included in the revision of LRN 8.01;.further, LRN 8.01 had not been revised subsequent to Inspection No. 78-01.
The inspector noted that characteristics to be audited are incorporated in the Audit Reports.
8.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, prccedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
j Item 2, under Procedure of Section No. LRN 10.01, dated August'24, 1978, of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual states, "All-Quality Assurance records must be legible, completely filled out, and adequately identi -
fiable as to item and activity involved." Quality Assurance Records are defined in LRN 10.01 as:
"those which furnish documentary evidence
-of the quality of items and of activities affecting Quality.(sic)."
4 lv 8112070528 810331-
~
~
PDR GA999 ENVSIEMA1
.99900338
, P DR..
2 Contrary to the above, the following Audit Reports had not been completely filled out inacmuch as no information had been entered in the " Auditor" or
" Audit Date". paces:
Procedure No. 5.01, attached to Sub-System Audit Report dated May 21, 1980; Procedure No. 8.02, attached to Sub-System Audit Report dated May 22, 1980; and Procedure No. 10.01 attached to Sub-System Audit Report dated May 22, 1980.
C.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, pro-cedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
Paragraph A.12, under Procedure - Assembly, of Section No. 5.01, dated February 9, 1978, of the Division Quality Assurance Manual, states in part, "At random times, Quality Assurance will audit and initial tags (Operator Quality Record) in the ' Quality Assurance' column if in agree-ment with the operator checks.
If discrepancies are found, the Quality Assurance Auditor will supply a HOLD TAG (appropriately marked as to the defect and corrective action to be taken) to the deviant motor (s) and notify the Assembly foreman."
Contrary to the above, Quality Assurance had not audited and initialed tags (Operator Quality Records) nor had Hold Tags been applied to the following motors, on Order No. 8-5102-90328, which were undergoing tests:
Serial Nos. 8-5102-LR9032801-7; 8-5102-LR9032801-11; and 8-5102-LR9032801-12.
See Details Section, paragraph, C.3.b.
D.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed and accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circum-stances.
Item 1:06.6 of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's (CEI Co's)
Specification No. SP-706-4549-00, Revision 1, dated November 3,.1976, states in part, "This element requires the establishment of measures that will assure control of the issuance, revision, and distribution of documents inclLding changes thereto affecting quality....
Distribution of these documents shall be to the locations or persons using the documents to perform the proscribed activity.
" Listed below are the areas that will be documented for this element of the quality program..
The system that will effect proper distribution of documents and the control of obsolete ones....
The measures that will be. exercised to assure that the latest approved documents are being used to perform the activity."
3 Contrary to the above, measures had not been established and documented to assure control and distribution of documents, including changes, to the location or person using the documents to perform a prescribed activity as evidenced by the following:
Test-Specifications, Nos. 51-240-502 and 51-240-505, dated May 14, 1971 and April 21, 1971, respectively, were located at the test station, during testing of CEI Co's. motors, while the copies in the possession of the engineer, in the office, were dated March 10, 1976.
E.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with= documented instructions, pro--
cedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
Paragraph B.3, under Procedure, of Section No. 3.03,-dated October 8, 1979, of the Divhion Quality Assurance Manual states, " Quality Assurance, Pro-duction and Manufacturing Engineering will jointly review the Operator Instruction Sheet and physically check the first piece part.to. Product Engineering specifications.
Verification now complete all will signify their approval by signing in the appropriate areas at bottom'of file copy of 0.I.S. sheet."
Contrary to the above, the file copy of the following Operator Instruc-tion Sheets, specified by Master Route Sheet No.'G.A. 5J-384-315-01-284-701, dated November 28,.1979, had not been approved by Production or Processing (Manufacturing Engineering):
1001-0124, dated January 23, 1978; 1002-0007, dated June 17, 1976; 1003-0017, dated June 17, 1976; 1007-0027, dated June 18, 1976;'and 1009-0007, dated June 18, 1976.
Additionally, che following OISs had not been approved by Production:
1104-0065, dated November 28, 1979; 433-1923; dated November 28, 1979;.
416-1531, dated November 28, 1979; and 427-1545, dated November 28,.
1979.
F.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities affectini; quality be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, pro-cedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
Paragraph 4.1.4 of Product Engineering General Procedure.No. 1.5, dated April 1, 1977 states, "The' changer (the person reissuing the drawing),
shall remove the aperture card from the Product Engineering file and-mark the card ' Drawing being revised' and refile the card."
Contrary to the above, aperture cards from the Phoduct. Engineering file had not been marked per the requirements,;for the following drawings that were in the revision cycle:
Nos. 51-816-107-001,~ Issue 2, dated October 8, 1980; 51-810-456, Issue 6, dated December 28, 1972; and.
3 53-902-631, Issue 14, dated March 15,-1980.
3 t
i
v 4
G.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires ~that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, pro-cedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
Product Engir.Aering General Procedure No.1.13, dated March 1977, contains the following requirements:
1.
Paragraph 3.1, states in part, "NSRE (Nuclear Safety Related Equipment) orders enter the Product Engineering function via the Item Sheet, Form CQF-2168 and Form B....
All documer.ts must be fully signed off in the location: identified on the' forms.
These sign-offs are mandatory and indicate that the forms are complete and have been submitted to all necessary reviews."
2.
Paragraph 4.4.a states, "The engineer doing the checking will independ-ently verify that the core size, winding and rotor core is adequate for specifications by comparison to similar designs.
The purpose of this check'is to screen out errors before production.
The ultimate verification of the electrical design is through testing of the finished product. The person doing the checking will sign and date the documents checked noting ' verified' by his name."
Contrary to the above:
1.
Item Sheets had.not been signed off as evidenced by Item Sheets for Order Nos. 8-5103-90322-1; 8-5102-90323; 8-5102-90324; and 8-5105-90325.
2.
The person doing the checking had not noted ' verified' by his name on Test Data for the following orders:
Nos. 8-5103-90322-1, Test Date, October 1979; 8-5103-90323, Test Date, Januarv_1980; 8-5103-90324, Test Date, October 1979; and 8-5105-90325, Test Date, January 1980.
I s
3
\\
t 9
i i
-.-' l~
_