ML20033D148
| ML20033D148 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/02/1981 |
| From: | Haass W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Curran J SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20033D149 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112070296 | |
| Download: ML20033D148 (2) | |
Text
_
>Mito UNITED STAT ES
%j,
[)
(
NUCLEAR REGULATOF.Y COMMISSION g
-;E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 NOV 0 21981 y.
REY l((b %
% W4 1981w TIL
- EEvo=
Mr. J. M. Curran 4
Manager, Quality Assurance gO Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770
Dear Mr. Curran:
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDED SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S QUALITY ASSURANCE TOPICAL REPORT The Papay/Haass letter of May 8,1981, submitted Amendment 4 to Southern California Edison's (SCE) topical report, SCE-1-A, " Quality Assurance Program " for staff re-view and approval.
Changes and corrections to Amenhent 4 were submitted in the O
Curran /Conway letter dated October 9,1981. Amendment 4 revised the topical report V
to reflect organizational and programatic changes, commitments to current regula-tory guides, and editorial changes.
Based on our evaluation of the proposed changes described in Amendment 4, we find that your amended topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.
Therefore, your amended topical report is acceptable, and you may implement it upon issuance of the amendment. We do not intend to repeat our review of this topical report when it is referenced in an application unless changes occur in our acceptance criteria.
To use the topical report in future license applications, SCE need only reference this topical report in Section 17 of the Safety Analysis Report.
In addition, this QA program may be implemented imediately on all ongoing activities. 'In this re-gard, identify in your transmittal letter those nuclear power plants that will be covered by Amen &ent 4 to SCE-1-A.
Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions about this topical report are invalidated, we will notify you. You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire.
Programatic changes by SCE to this topical report are to be submitted to NRC for review prior to imple-mentation. Organizational changes are to be submitted no later than 30 days after announcemen t.
o3 Please replace our letter of July 1,1980, &nd the enclosure to the June 28, 1977, f
n letter which was the staff's evaluation of the report through Amendment 1, with 1/33 V
a copy of this letter and the enclosed topical report evaluation in your report,.
renumber the report SCE-1-A, Amendment 4, and resubmit 36 copies.
8112070296 811102?
PDR TOPRP EUTSCE; C
p
)
Mr. J. M. Curran NOV 0 21981 O
Should you have any questions regarding our review or if we can provide assistance, please feel free to contact Mr. James Conway on (301) 492-9489.
Sincerely,
A (L L3 v
Walter P. Haass, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Division of Engineering
Enclosure:
Topical Report Evaluation 9
O