ML20033D051
| ML20033D051 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/01/1981 |
| From: | Krimm R Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112070160 | |
| Download: ML20033D051 (13) | |
Text
r 4
t Federal Emergency Management Agency
' $y P #q Washington, D.C. 20472 DEC 1 19 81 m
Y O) nll0fh%\\
K MORANDUM FOR: Brian Grimes L.U I
Director b
bbC4 Jggy Division of Emergency Preparedness
- Es.eu2w D -
N*
U. S. Nuclear Re latory Commission y
U en FROM:
m
~
gr Acting Assistant Associate Director su Office of Natural and Technological Hazards
SUBJECT:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Plant Attached is a copy of a current findings evaluation of plans and implementation capabilities of State and local governments for the San Onofre (Cal) Nuclear Generating Plant.
Attachment 2hh 0
- F
r q.
ROu ti
-a p I
e,..n n:xct X
l gj g
l
.... _. _ _ '...l illO
- t. (s C A T IO N. Was. h.i_ngton, D..C..
L OC A l lON:..S.a_tt.. F_r_rncisco, CA D A I E - fitA E GROtJI '
1 N A >1 E: __... Frank. Bourgin N A *A L :
. Francis S, Japfla_ _. _
O f F I C E SY r.9 401. :
Tech Haz,Div O l F IC E S Y !.W O t.. Actg..RD R9 287-0200 556-9412 l
T E L EPH ONI
- 1. X T.
T E tr.PiiONE E XT:
N u r.18 E a O F P A G E S:
B Ei.1AI M S: (.%ncb: 1:i.ir.ctions. F.2x id nti!.c:: ion. S.o;.tt:w. cie.1 t vi.r:2 m.
e or x;tta<.c a TELECOPIER NO.
287-0543 (Panafax, automatic, b minutes)
Ronald H. Sandwina f R E LE ASE R*S INIT1ALS):
.:3 O.2
~;, =
r.e..
s,)
4
..)
T na i>
l
.e i
4 4
_ me e.e
..e.
1 I
l
CP Federal Emergency Management Agency J
< q Region IX 211 Main Street, Room 220 San Francisco, CA 94105 N(N i 6 881 Tc;ICUAMD ORI INAL Certified By b
MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, STATE AND LOCAL PROGRAMS AND SUPPORT DIRECTORATE Attention:
Robert T. Jaske Acting Chief Technological Hazards Division FROM:
f Francis S. Manda, Acting Regional Director
SUBJECT:
FEMA Region IX Update Evaluation with Respect to the Adequacy of Plans and the Implementation Capabilities l
of State and Local Governments Related to San Onofre j
Nuclear Generating Station Subject update evaluation is attached for your infomation and action. Accomplishment of the corrective action identified in the body of the update evaluation should provide a Teasonable assurance of a capability to respond to an off-site emergency at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Attachment l
l I
Novcabar 13, 1981 FEMA REGION IX UPDATE EVALUATION WITE RESPECT TO THE ADEQUACY OF PLANS AND THE IMPLEMENTATION CAPABILITISS OF STATE AND LOCAL COVERNMENTS RELATED TO SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION I.
liiT RODUCTIO N This evaluation serves to update the FEMA Region IX evalua-tion for the period ending May 22, 1981.
Its purpose is to relate actions taken by Southern California Edison Company and the local jurisdictions and reflects upon only those actions taken and products generated since May 22, 1981.
It does not address events or products before that date.
II.
BASIS FOR EVALUATION A.
Ine basis for evaluation consists of documents submitted by Southern California Edison Company in their October 15, 1981, letter to the FEMA Region IX Regional Assistance Committee Chairman (attachment 1, without enclosurer), and personal contacts, ccenun-ications, and products received from the Utility *and local juris-dictions between May 22, and November 5, 1981.
B.
No drills or axercises were conducted during the period, nor are any scheduled as of November 5, 1981.
Neither the State of California nor FEMA Region II have attended or monitored any training to evaluate scope and content due to no formal advice of training nor' formal submission of course schedules or related information.
III.
SIATUS OF EVENTS A.
General:
Subsequent to the initial review of the response capa-bility related to the San Onotre Nuclear Cenerating Station (SONCS),
the Interjurisdic tional Planning Committee (IJPC) (comprised of all jurisdictions involved, as well as the Utility), was formalized and began a comprehensive review of the response capability.
They have made great progress in addressing the corrective action items, identified in the vario'us assessments of the exercise and plan reviews.
The jurisdictions r: ported on October 30, 1981, that they anticipated the identified Standing Operating Procedures (SOP's) and plan changes would be submitted to the respective goverring bodies around or before the first of 1982.
Draft SOP's submitted by the Utility served only as a starting point as they were not cooperatively developed.
The IJPC neets monthly, and through continued work of sub-committees is actively working in developing SOP's and a totally coordinated response capability that when finally established, should offer an optimum cooperative response capability.
4
2 B.
Equipment:
Equipment requested from the Utility is reported by Orange County and San Clemente to be about 90 percent delivered.- San Diego County reported 100 percent delivery.
7EMA Region IX utility representative provide Project Officer requested that a a
listing of equipment identifying delivery addressees, dates of delivery, remaining equipment due-in dates, and related information to assist in an assessment of corrective action.
The request was partially fulfilled, and requires further response to the above requested information.
C.
Warnina:
The Utility has chosen sirens as a means of alerting the population during an emergency.
Wh il e the sirens have been installed within a 10 mile planning area, they have not been tested.
A a few days prior to the l
testing date was cancelled in late October, test, and no schedule for testing has been identified.
Operation l
of the system remains in the control of the Utility at this date.
Sirens do not cover all of the city of San Juan Capistrano and the l
community of Dana Point.
FEMA Region IX recomme'nds,.as does California Office of Emergency Services, that the Plume Exposure Pathway include entire jurisdictiona opposed to bisecting some as (e.g.,
San Juan Capistrano) along the 10 mile radius.
This uould agree with current Orange County plan instructions.
Some form of alerting of the area of San Juan Capistrano and Dana Point outside
~
the 10 mile radius of the Emergency Planning Zone should be provided.
D.
Standing Operating Procedures (SOP's):
The SOP's submitted by the Utility were represented as "a copy of all 50P's which have been developed by local government...."
In fact, most jurisdictions reported that SOP development was done by the Utility's contractor; coordination of the SOP's with local government was minimal.
All jurisdictions report that the submitted documents have not been approved, nor represent local jurisdictional plans.
As auch, while the submissions represent an ef fort by the Utility, it does not appear to improve the off-site response capability at this time.
Further review of the SOP's reflects a number of inconsistencies. For example:
(a) in at least three cases SOP's for different jurisdictions reflected duplicate informa-
'.v e occurred (Table 1, Agricultural tion where such should not I.nd Use, and_ Tables 7 and Ingestioc Pathway Sampling'to SOP 13); and (b) the ODAC SOP was considered confusing, lacked clarity, and objectivec were not clear.
3 E.
Statit Planning:
The State of California Plan SOP's are being reviewed in draft fo rm and censidered to be due out in final around the end of January 1982.
F.
Training:
Generally, the Utility submitted to Region IX an incomplete set of draf t lesson plans.
The submission lacked organization and an overview and a long term schedule of courses.
G.
Corrective Action Conoliance:
The Utility submission of corrective actions relates to some seven items. identifying general accion necessary to correct deficiencies developed in the initial evaluation process.
(Reference attachment 2, Utility letter to B.
Grimes, NRC, June 26, 1981.) An asserament of those actions as they relate to the format are identified below:
1.
Training and equipment concerns have partially been met as referenced above.
SOP development still remains to be finished by the State and local jurisdictions.
SOP's submitted by the Utility require major modifications as discussed.
2.
Emergency Operation Facility (EOF) procedures and development of an op1 rations facility are satisfactory.
3.
SOP development for monitoring and assessment duties is in its final stages by the jurisdictions.
Drills remain to be conducted to demonstrate their applicability.
4.
Siren tests remain to be conducted, although they are installed.
An alerting capability for the balance of the San Juan Capistrano and Dane Point jurisdictions is recommended.
The Utility is still working on this issue.
5.
Equipment lists submitted were not clear as to what was promised locals an opposed to what has been delivered.
Juris-dictions report about 90 percent has been delivered.
6.
Training is being conducted and local jurisdiction personnel haved attended courses. (However, training prog *am information submitted was confusing and unclear regarding courses, length of course, schedules, etc..
Further program clarification is requested for assessment.
No drills have been conducted to date.
7.
The Public information progr'an was submitted and is satisfactory.
\\
T m_
4.
~
IV.
APPLICATION OF CRITERIA The criteria for review and approval of radiological plans and preparedness as cited in 50.47 and 44 CFR 350.5 (proposed) were addressed in the initial review.
Items previously found satisfactory were not restated.
Those issues remaining open for further action are addreased below:
A.
350.5a(1).
Due to the status of SOP development by the State and the local jurisdictions, this item remains to be reviewed and a finding reached upon completion of SOP's.
This is estimated te occur in January 1982.
At that time a clarifica-tion of monitoring and assessment duties may be determined.
While a concern, this item is considered to be one that may be resolved within the next 90 days.
Orange County has reported actions being taken to resolve general jurisdictional response support to San Juan Capistrano during an emergency.
When finalized, the cooperative response planning should alleviate the problem of personnel requirements in support of an emergency.
B.
350.5a(3).
The interim EOF has been relocated to another area of the San Clemente Fira Department faciliqy, increasing working space and separating the function from the San Clemente EOC.
Procedures (SOP's) have been established for its operation.
Communications systems have been added or modified to improve the general operations of the facility.
A drill is recommended to test facility and personnel functions.
EOF, ODAC, and Liaison SOP's need review by State and FEMA, and concurrence by all jurisdictions to validate operations and provide the basis for training users.
A drill should be scheduled by January 31, 1982, conducted hefore April 1,
1982, and evaluated by State and FEMA personnel.
Completion should reflect a reasonable assurance of meeting the standard.
C.
350.5a(5_).
The means for notification to the public remain to be tested.
The installation of sirens has been completed, b'ut tests have not been run.
Further, sirens or alternative systems h av e not been installed or designed to cover all of the city of San Juan Capistrano and Dana Point.
The Utility should provide complete alert coverage of the city of San Juan Capistrano and Dana Point as part o f_ the Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone.
Assuming the Utility meets the February 1982 date established by NRC and the tests are successful, this and related planning actions should assure compliance with standards.
D.
,350.5a(7).
The Utility has submitted a Public Informa-tion package that is comprehensive and addresses those areas of concern.
Hailers have been sent out within the Plume Exposure Pathway, including all of the city of San Juan'Capistrano.
A continued program of information, resupply, and verification is recommended to assure thorough coverage of all of the affected population.
Compliance with this standard is considered to have been met.
L
e S
E.
350.5s(8).
The Utility has procured and delivered to jurisdictions an estimated 90 percent of promised equipment.
Assuming a favorable clarification regarding conflicts between submitted statements of the October 15, 1981, letter versus reporta from jurisdictional personnel and/or final delivery of all equipment within a reasonable period of tier, there is reasonable assurance this standard will be met.
F.
350.5a(9).
While equipment has been procured and
~
r eportedly delivered, training and drill demonstration has not been completed.
An Ingestion Pathway sampling drill should also be demonstrated when State and local procedures are resolved.
.These items should be scheduled by January 31, 1982, and drills conducted before April 1, 1982 (with the possible exception of Ingestion Pathway due to State plan / SOP ~ support). These drills should also be monitored by State and FEXA personnel.
G.
350.Sa(14).
should be conduc ted _
As indicated in B and F above, drills to train, test, and demonstrate an ability to coordinate and execute necessary SOP's and plans.
The Utility should establish drills in conjunction with State and local juris-dictions (giving priority and emphasis to their, schedules and requirements) to meet drill requirements.
Coordination and review by FEMA Region IX is recommended to assure satisfactory accomplish-ment of requirements.
H.
350.5a(15).
The training materials provided by the Utility have not clearly demonstrated an organized program with clest definition of objectives, outline of courses, schedules of training and concurrence involved parties in course selection, content, or schedules.
Lesson plans were in draft and did not have
- titles, times, or detail to clearly define a training course program.
The Utility should revise or reorganize their training program in conjunction with. State and local agencies, and forward a product addressi'ng the above mentioned items on or before March 1, 1982, to FEMA Region IX.
Assuming this is accomplished and that predetermined subjects are included Las identified in prior dis-cussions and correspondence, this standard could reasonably be considered to have been met.
I.
350.5a(16).
Local jurisdictions and the State are contemplating delivery o f revised plans and finished SOP's-sround February 1, 1982.
Assuming these estimates are generally met, the requirements for SOP's and revised plans can be presumed to be met in the near future.
The Utility submission of SOP's relating to EOF actions should be considered to require f ur t h'e r coordination with local, State, and TEMA Region IX personnel and a revision to those SOP's developed for reviev'by Ma rch 1,- 1982.
A meeting to discuss the nature o f the revi sions should be scheduled by January 1,
1982.
6_
~
6 1
V.
INTERIM RE-EVALUATION A.
The actions voluntarily taken by the local jurisdictions in response to the initial findings and their accomplishments at this juncture have been excellent.
Staff members are currently working to update SOP's and revise plans, and have attended train-ing offered by various organizations.
The Utility corrective actions have reflectec an interest in meeting.the standards but require a redirection of effort to take advantage of other avail-able sources of information regarding planning and training.
A reassertion of cooperation and coordination by the Utility towarde all pr-;ies involved is highly recommended to enhance and expedite corrective actions identified.
3.
Assuming that the efforts identified continue to f-uition and that drillt are conducted within the identified time fra s,
there is a rer.sonable assurance that a capability to provide emergency res ponse will exist within the near future as regards San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station off-site emergency response.
Attachmentc 2 4
8 L-
_____.__..m____.
Southern California Edison Company g5 P. O. 90X COD 22d4 WALNUT GRCVE AVENUE MCSEMEAD C ALsFORNI A 91770 K. P. S A5 KIN vsLapwoes t
= ~ m. o.
vete.-.......
October 15, 1981 inn,u..n S&PE Tb. Ahc LICEhls%G CJ1GUATED ORI INAL Certified By U e
~
~%
Mr. Ronald H.
Sandwina
.g Chairman, Regional Assistance Committee Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX 211 Main Street, Room 220 San Francisco, Ca,lifornia 94105
Dear Mr. Sandwina:
SUBJECT:
Final Report Action Plan to Address FEMA's Evaluation Dated June 3, 1981
REFERENCES:
(a) SCE (K.P. Baskin) letter to the NRC (Brian Grimes) dated June 26, 1981, subject:
Emergency Planning, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Unit No. 1, Docket No. 50-206.
(b) FEMA (R.T. Jaske) memorandum to the NRC (Brian Grimes) dated July 14, 1981, subject:
Emergency Preparedness and Support of. San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
(c) SCE (K.P. Baskin) letter to you dated Jul.
16, 1981, subject:
Progress Report, Action Plan to Address FEMA's
)
Evaluation Dated June 3,1981.
j (d) SCE (K.P. Baskin) letter to you l
dated August 14, 1981, subject:
Progress Report.' Action Plan to Addres.s FEMA's Evaluation Dated June 3,~19S1.
(e) SCE (X.P. Baskin) letter to you i
dated September IS, 1981, subject:
Progress Report, Ac ion Plan to Address FEMA's Evaluation Dated June 3, 1981.
l l
v
Mr. Ronald H. Sandwina October 15, 1981 (f) Federal Register, Vol. 46, page 46587-46588, (September 21, 1981),
l NRC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
ENCLOSURES:
(1) Standard Operating Procedures of local government with radiological emergency response plans for San Onofre.
(2) Listing of radiation monitoring and related equipment in the possession of local government with radiation mon-itoring responsibilities around San Onofre.
(3) Description of upgrided communi-cations capability invo'ving San Onofre Eme gency Response Organizations.
(4) Description of the Emergency Operations Facility for San Onofre.
(5) Description of public alerting (siren) system for persons.within the Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ.
(6) Description of training programs and training accomplished for personnel having emergency response responsibility
- for San Onofre.
(7) Description of public information programs and completed public informa-tion dissemination.
The purpose of this letter is to report the completion of all action which was agreed upon at our meeting on June 15, 1981, as being necessary to resolve the FEMA concerns set forth in the " Interim Findings and Determination Relating to the i
Status of State and Local Emergency Preparedness for the San j
Onofre Nuclear Generating Station" dated 4 ne 3, 1981.
Enclosure (2) of reference (a) provided a summary of the intended action, i
and reference (a) confirmed ~ that such measures would constitute sufficient corrective action.
References (c), (d), and (e) pro-j vided reports of progress made towards the accomplishment of the, agreed-upon objectives.
.Mr. Ronald H. Sandwina 13-October 15, 1981 The enclosures to this letter provide documentation of the actual results achieved.
Each enclosure is keyed to the seven numbared action items set forth in the " Summary of Plan-ned Action" (enclosure (2) of reference (a)) as discussed below:
1.
Enclosure (1) consists of a copy of all SOP's which have been developed by local government (with SCE support) and are considered to have sufficient breadth and scope to satisfy FEMA's concerns with respect to procedures expressed in items (1), (2),
(3), and (4) of enclosure (1) of reference (a).
Additional SOP's have also been drafted covering subjects beyond those identified by FEMA, copies of which are also included.
These correspond to item 1 (1) given in enclosure (2) of reference' (a) for.which the schedule was final draft by November 1, 1981, and implementation by December 1, 1981.
2.
Enclosure (2) sets forth the lists of equipment relating to radiation monitoring functions which are now in the possession of the appropriate local governmental organizations.
This is considered to fully resolve FEMA's concerns regarding equip-ment weaknesses expressed in item (1) set forth in enclosure (1) of reference (a).
3.
Enclosure (3) is a description of enhancements made to the emergency communications systems.
This is considered to fully respond to FEMA's recommendation for additional communications equipment expressed in item (5) set forth in enclosure (1) of reference (a).
4.
Enclosure (4) describes the arrangements which have been made to improve the EOF operations.
The present operational procedures, staffing, and physical arrangements are considered to entirely meet FEMA's recommendations expressed in item (2) set forth in enclosure (1) of ref-erence (a).
5.
Enclosure (5) describes the engineering of the public alert (siren) system.
This system is completely constructed and will undergo acceptance testing early in November.
This system, in conjunction with the notification procedures given in enclosure (1), is consid-ered to fully resolve FEMA's concerns expressed in item (4) of enclosure (1) of reference ~(a).
i
M r.. Ronald H. Sandwina October 15, 1981 It should also be noted that reference (f) sets forth the NRC's intentions to revise its regu-lations to defer until February 1, 1982, its requirements for prompt notification systems.
6.
Enclosure (6) sets forth SCE's programs for the training of offsite emergency response person-nel.
Actual training which has been accomplished as well as future training which has a definite schedule is described.
SCE's commitment to provide training ic considered to full'y(6) set respond to FEMA's recommendation given in item forth in enclosure (1) of reference (a).
7.
Enclosure (7) sets forth SCr,.s public education program.and provides samples of public informa-tion material which has beer, distributed to j
local population groups.
The action taken to date in conjunction with SCE's commitment for continuing public education fully resolves FEMA's concerns expressed in item (7) set forth in enclosure (1) of reference (a).
It is believed that the foregoing completes the immediate action previously agreed to which will serve as a basis of revised FEMA findings of overall adequacy.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours, K.P. Baskin Enclosures cc:
R.ll. Engelken. NRC, Region V J.J.
Kearns, California OES IPC Representatives 4
h e
a 3
y L:
Southern California Edison Company e
P Q RCA 800 2 244 W ALNut GROVE AV CNUE mOSC M C AC,. C ALIFO%*dl A 317 70 x.p.maszin
.,e...
. o r -oc 6 e - = : = e.= s s a > = =.
fattraont
.4,it.....ues u..
niu ma..
June 26, 1981 Mr. Brian K. (Mms Office of Inspection and Enfwcaat U.S. Nuclear reg;11atory Ccratission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. cM = s:
SUBJECP: hergency Planning San Onofre W. clear Genarating Station Unit No. 1 ibi:ket No. 50-206 We hava reviewed the " Interim Finiings and Deternination Belating to the Status of State and Iccal Dnerge5cy Preparedness for the San Onofze Naclear Generating Station" prepared by the Federal Dergency Ma.pc Agency (Enm) dated June 3,1981. Copies of this status repcrt have also been distributed to the affected local jurisdictions for their review.
'the N
purpose of this letter is to report on fonog action which is conterrplated by SCE to stM. State and local jurisdictions to acnieve substantial improve ents in certa 2n areas identified in the ED% report, and to set z,
forth the schedule for the accomplis. rent of these irprovenents.
~.
At the time of mW s " Interim Findings and Determination" S2 recognized that several topics required 'further develcpmnt.
&st of the required action involved develcyment of procedures.
Indeed, the lack of SOP's covering various activities appears to have unduly infloanced the severity of the adverse EDR ccnclusions.
Meetings were held on June 10 and June 17, 1981 involving all local jurisdictions and SCE to develcp a plan of action for the centinuing develcp:ent of emergency preparedness.
In addition, SCE met with EE R Regicn IX representatives on June 15 and June 19, 1981 to reach an understanding as to the relative significance of its findings and reccm-nendatio a.
Enclosure (1) to this letter entitled " Corrective Pctions Pequired to Mdress EDM Determinations of June 3,1981" sets forth the secpe of the significant areas and a dwcripticn of the actions which will form the basis of updated ma finding of everall adequacy.
Enclosure (2) is an updatal sim' of the corrective acticn to =Eress all areas e
.~
G<d eo " 2"'
.Page 2 c
e neeFing devele; rent and a schedule for the accxr:plishnent of each tcpic.
Th%9e itens sham with a cmpleticn date en or before Cetober 15, 1981 )
are considered to be sufficient to yield favorable FDA findings.
(
We consider that State and local Qcvem ents have dcne a remarkably good j& in acnieving a gocd state o' preparedness in the critical areas i.mportant for the protection of the public.
'Ihis wod.
has included preparat$m and femal adoption by the highest authority for each local jurisdicticn (except for State agencies) of radiological errergency respcnse plans and eshMi<drent of a local intaragency coordinaticn group.
He intend to give the strongest possible support to the local age.acies in W31g planned inprovements.
We are ccnfident 'Jat the cmbined SCE/ local 9:nernment agency effort will fully satisfy NBC requirements for acergency preraredness in a timely manner.-
Very tnaly yours,
/
K.'P. Baskin
~
Attaduants cc: John E. Dickey, IDA Francis S. Manda, FD'A, Region IX R. H. Dagelken, $14C, I & E Regicn V R. Sanchtina, PDA, Begion IX
~'
Ms. Barbara Pax, Orange Ccunty 1,
J. Hunt, San Diego County R. Coleman, City of San Clemente Ms. Cynthia Ferguscn, City of San Juan Capistrano J. Stoe, State Parks & Pacreaticn - Pendletcn Area Lt. Col. J. Wallace, USE, Carp Pendletcn J. Kearns, State CES e
o S
e
% e P
e e
)
ENCtOSURE(
CORRECT.IVE ACTIONS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS FEMA DETERMINA110NS OF JUNE 3, 1981*
f t
FEMA C0hCERNS FEMA HECOMMEtiPATION RESPONSE **
FEMA Region IX Evaluation of Plans and Capabilitics "Most Critical Concern" L.
The assessment and -
Develop a multi jurisdic-Continue to install the Health Physics Computer j
monitoring of actual tional respnnse capability which will provide. a prompt conservative assessmen offsite radiological to assure adequiite coverage the actual radiological consequences of an acciden consequences of a of plume pathway and stan-This will be operational to a limited degree by fu)s radiological emergency dardized procedures which load with full operation espected by July, 1982, conditiori through allow flexibility in Further develop standard radiological monitoring (mettioils, systems"and
- response, procedures (SDP's) for the local,turtsdictions and equ ipment--is -considered.,
Offsite Dose Assessment Center (CDAC) by August, e
1 to be w'eak and in need 1981.
SCE additionally will assess the local of improvement to meet
( jurisdictions' current equipment against their minimum criteria.
needs and identify any deficiencies noted.
SCE wi(
provide staf fing to assume a role of leadership in function.
SCE will provide training ' programs for g lovolved in use of the $0P's.
" Serious Concern" 2.
The interim - EOF Until the permanent EOF is SCE will develop 50P's to make current EOF operatiE shows a' lack of clear completed, the interim EDF clearer and more manageable along the lines of the operating procedures, should be relocated to a current planning arrangements it.imited physical fragmentation of the -
single locatt on separate improvements of the present facilities will be ideI facility, lack of from the San Clemente EOC fled and accomplished, management direction and staffed with management, f
communications, size connunicators and other s
of the facility, and support personnel necessary 1
is a st'gnificant for EOF operations.
impedance to the San Clemente EOC operation.
- Ihe schedule for these actions is identified in ENCLOSUHE (2) oc l
As a result'of a meeting between FEMA and SCE on June 15. 1981, it is SCE's understanding that the significant concet
.sddressed in the FEMA Region IX Evaluation of the Muy 13, 1901 Exercise are covered in these niannmi actinns.
FEMA CDEERN5 FEMAREC0ftlEEDAT10N RESPONSES, E
" Major Concerns" 3.
A need to clarify
. Develop a joint standardized (See item [1] above).
SCE will develop standardfra monitoring and assess-multi-jurisdictional respon4e procedures for the five involved counties to obtalj
' ment duties for both team.
obtain samples, conifuct analyses, and take necessas plume and ingestion protective actions for the ingestion path'wey emergt pathe ys as they pertain planning zone consistent with the State Radiologic to State OES, State flealth proposed ingestion pathway procedures.
Devq Radiological Health and local jurisdiction.
an Integrated radiological response team to be dirq by the offsite Uose Assessment Center.(00AC) to con field monitoring.
4 Means to provide early Install strens and provide SCE will proceed with current plans for stren insta notification and clear warning dissemination capacity SCE will develop 50P's for public notification via instructions to the to remote areas where public Emergency Broadcast System (EDS) and local stations public within the plume address systems f rom surface identified in the plans.
SCE will develop.50P's fa exposure pathway EPZ or airborne vehicle is coordinitionanddectsfonmakintjinuseofsirens.
have not been installed required..
4 or tested.
5.
Adequate emergency SCE provide response equip-Agreements have been made between SCI and local age facilities and equip-ment which was promised to that specific equipment Will be ordered by the loca ment to support.the the local jurtsdictions, dictions and bflied to SCE.
Equipment procurement (
emergency response including sirens and addt-begun and is continuing.
SCE will follow up with Os have not been providid, tional communications eq'uip-status of equipment received or on order.
SCE wili ment.
equipment needs and status of equipment procurement activities.
6.
Radiological energency SCE, in conjunction with the (See items'[1] and [3].above)
.SCE w{ll develop a response training has State of Callfornia, should implement a program (of training 'in the critical are essentially not been develop the necessary train-radiation monitoring arld"assessindnt, communicatio'ns i
provided to those who ing to meet the identified decision-making and coordination regarding protecti may be called upon to needs in the local jurts-actions, etc.
asstst in an emergency.
dictions.
9 a
9 0
dM h
n e
FEMA CONCERNS' FEMA RECOMMENDATION RESPONSES
" Sufficient Concern to Remain a Major issue" I
7.
SCE has not made infor-Disseminate advance public SCE will proceed with the public education progrd mation available about information.
that includes an einergency response brochure and (
hw the public would be tion information brochure mailer, preparation and notified or what the distributfon of flyers and posters, new ads, consa public's initial actions meetings, etc.
should be in an emergency.
T l
\\
I 4
e e
a e
G e
e e
S e
O e
)
i
)
)
N
SUMMARY
OF PLANNED ACT10'N SCHEDUI.E Items (a)through
- 1.. Develop 50P's covering the following topics:
1st draft - 7/15/8 Operation of the Offsite Dose Assessment Center (ODAC)
Final draft - 9/1/
a.
~
Implement - J n",'d b.
Radiation surveys by field monitoring teams f
/
c.
Emergency Communications
/of4/Bf d.
Use of the siren alerting system and public notification Coordination relating to protective actions e.
f.
Acquisition, display and use of meteorological data g.
Operation of the E0F Item (1):
h.
Ingestion pathway monitoring '
Ist draft - 9/i5/8:
Final draft - 13/1 i.
Existing 50P's covering other plan' elements Implement - 12/1/8.
2.
Obtain equipment required to carry out radiation monitoring functions Survey types and quantities of equipment actually in place 7/15/81 a.
Initiate procurement.of equipment shortagesh/k/81 h
b.
/8#T#/
f 3.
Develop adoitional cocenunications capability a.
Expand interagency phone network to include CHP 7/15/81 di>4. %
b.
Provide speaker monitors at EOC's 7/15/81 lev 4 N
' c.
Provide teletype message system network between all 10/15/81 principal centers d.
Provide additional cor:nunication circuits 10/15/81 4
Make physical improvements to the EOF a.
Identify possible improvements 9/1/81 b.
Obtain agreements to make improvements 9/1/81 c.
Construct improvements 10/15/81 S.
Install Sirens 50% Dy 7/1/81 90% by 9/1/81 1001 by 10/15/81 h
p.
1
s
-2.-
SCHEDULE
~
6.
Accomplish
- training in use of new and existing procedures,
\\
facilities, and equipraent, Develop training program (long and short term) 7/15/81 s.
b.
Developtrainingmaterial(shorttermprogram) ff/I8/~
- "/1/01 Conduct training and drills (short term program) 9/1/81 through c.
['
c.
In:plement long term training program 10/15/81 11/1/81 through 2/1/ 82 7
Public Information Program Ongoing.
Initial program complete 9/1/81
/
5 t
I O
e r
e i
l m
S e