ML20033C823

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-267/81-24 on 811001-31.Noncompliance Noted: Sources Left Unattended Outside Assigned Storage Room. Failure to Follow Equipment Clearances & Operation Deviations Procedure
ML20033C823
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain 
Issue date: 11/10/1981
From: Dickerson M, Plumlee G, Westerman T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20033C819 List:
References
50-267-81-24, IEC-81-13, NUDOCS 8112040340
Download: ML20033C823 (9)


See also: IR 05000267/1981024

Text

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

- _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ ._

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

_-

_.

-

.

APPENDIX B

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION IV

IE Inspection Report: 50-267/81-24

License DPR-34

Docket: 50-267

Licensee:

Publi.: Service Company of Colorado

.P. O. Bcx 840

Denver, Colorado

80201

Facility Name:

Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generation Station

Inspection at: Fort St. Vrain Site, Platteville, Colorado

Inspection Conducted: October 1-31, 1981

Inspectors:

3I

M

/h/#Y

M. W. Dickerson, Senior Resident Ra%ctor Inspector

Date

i

.,

7?'kbES=

d~

u-o

>

G. L. Plumlee III, Resident Reactor Inspector

Date

.

/

Approved By:

/4/#~F/

T. F. Westerman, Chief, Reactor Project Section flo.1

Date

Inspection Sumary

Inspection conducted October 1-31, 1981 (Recort:

50-267/81-24)

f-

Areas Inspected:

Routine, announced inspection of Surveillance; Maintenance;

Operational Safety Verification; Licensee Event Follow-Up; Review of Periodic

and Special Reports; and IE Circulars. The inspection involved 157 inspection-

,

hours on site by two NRC inspectors.

'

Results: Within the six areas inspected, three violations were identified

(Failure to adhere to Technical Specifications, Paragraph 3.B.,-failure to

follow procedures, Paragraphs 3.A and4.B.)'

8112040340 811116

,

PDR ADOCK 05000267

0

PM

. -

.- -

.

- -

- - .

-

- - -

--

.

2

1.

Persons Contacted

T. Borst, Radiation Protection Manager

M. Block, Superintendent of Operations

R. Craun, Acting Site Engineering Coordinator

M. Deniston, Shift Supervisor

D. Evans, Shift Supervisor

M. Ferris, Technical Services Engineer

W. Franek, Results Supervisor

W. Franklin, Shift Supervisor

J. Gahm, QA Manager

'

E. Hill, Operations Manager

D. Hood, Shift Supervisor

J. Liebelt, Senior Maintenance Supervisor

M. McBride, Technical Services Manager

F. Novachek, Technical Advisor

G. Reigel, Shift Supervisor

L. Singleton, Superintendent Operations OA

J. Van Dyke, Shift Supervisor

D. Warembourg, Manager Nuclear Production

R. Webb, Maintenance Supervisor

The NRC inspector also contacted other plant personnel including

f

reactor operators, maintenance men, electricians, technicians and

administrative personnel.

The regional SALP meeting with PSC management was alsc conducted

during the period of this report.

A subsequent report will be issued.

2.

Licensee Action on Previous Insoection Findings

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8111-01): Tritium concentration in

'

cooling tower blowdown water discharge exceeded 10 CFR 20 limits.

'

Procedural controls are in effect while design change considerations

are being investigated by the licensee.

The design changes are

considered as an unresolved item.

(8124-05)

l

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8111-02): System Status Tags in place but

!

System Abnormalities Deviation Forrs indicated system returned to

normal. The licensee issued a speedy memo to operators recarding

the problem and has replaced the System Abnormalities Book with three

separate books containing:

(1) Temporary Change Reports, (2) P. lear-

ances, and (3) Operations Deviations Reports.

'

!

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8112-02): Surveillance test records

indicated approval even though these records contained data

omissions and data outside the prescribed acceptance criteria.

The errors have been corrected, level 1 Procedure P-4 has replaced

Administrative Procedure 13, and a group has been established to

review and rewrite Surveillance Test Procedures.

Completion of

this review is scheduled for March 1,1982. Completion of this

review is considered an unresolved item.

(8124-06)

.

  • W

w

r

w

w

_ - - - - - - - _ - - . - , - - _ . - _ . _ .

. _ -

_.

.

3

'

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8113-01): Concentration of total residual

'

chlorine in the non-radioactive liquid effluent exceeded that specified

in Technical Specification LC0 NR 1.1.

No violation was determined

to have occurred since the licensee returned the concentration within

the time allowed and was therefcre not reportable.

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8113-02): Total Phosphate on February 24,

4

1981, exceeded the 50% limit, and the daily samples required

'

.

by Technical Specification SR NR 1.l(b) were not taken. The daily

samples not taken cannot be taken to backfit the requirement.

'

However, the error was discussed by the licensee with members of

the Water Chemistry Department and a rewrite of Surveillance Pro-

cedure SR NR 1.1 was completed, which included a better explanation

of the requirements.

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8113-03):

Seventeen of 20 weekly surveillances

NR 1.1-W had been started on Friday, but the Shift Supervisor's approval

i

to start the surveillances had not been given until the following

Monday. The day of issuance of the tests was changed to coincide

with the Shift Supervisor's approval on Mondays.

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8113-06): The printer for RR 93256,

" Effluent Activity Monitor," was found secured and recorder RR 93254,

" Area Monitor," was found not to have been returned to service following

a surveillance. An Operations Surveillance test was written to assure

'

that all recorders are in service and requires sign-off by the

operator each shift. For RR 93254 discussions were held by the licen-

see with the surveillance test conductor to reiterate his responsi-

4

bilities. Additionally, Surveillance SR 5.4.9-W was rewritten so that

'

it is now consistent with a standardized format for surveillance tests, and

requires the test conductor to return the recorder to normal in a more

appropriate part of the test.

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8113-07): Nine Standard Clearance Points

Forms with auxiliary tags had not been checked off as required by

r

l

Procedure P-2.

All clearances were audited by the licensee for

conformance to requirements and all personnel involved in equipment

'

clearances and operations deviations were required to review the

l

requirements as set forth in Administrative Procedure P-2.

j

(Closed) Violation (50-267/8113-09): The north stairwell access

radiation barrier to the refueling floor was not in place as required

-

by Health Physics Procedure HPP-9. The barrier was immediately

replaced and appropriate marking devices were and will be provided

independent of the barrier marking.

I

I

- _ , ,

_ ,

, _ .

_ _ - . _ _ . , _ - _ _

_ . , . _ - - _ , - . . _

, . . _ , - . . . _ . ...

- - - . .

,

-,__,_-, ,-

.

4

3.

Operational Safety Verification

Tne NRC inspector reviewed licensee ;civities to ascertain that

the facility is being operated safely and in conformance with

regulatory requirements, and the licensee's management control

system is effectively discharging its responsibilities for continued

safe operation. The review was conducted by direct observation

of activities, tours of the facility, interviews and discussion

with licensee personnel, independent verification of safety system

status and limiting condition for operations, and review of facility

records.

Included in the inspection were observation of control room

activities, review of operational logs, records, and tours of

accessible areas.

Logs and records reviewed included:

Shift Supervisor Logs

.

Reactor Operator Logs

.

Equipment Operator Logs

.

Auxiliary Operator Logs

.

Technical Specification Compliance Logs

.

Operations Order Book

.

Operations Deviations Reports

.

Clearance Log

.

Temporary Configuration Reports

.

P' ant Trouble Reports

.

During tours of accessible areas, particular attention was directed

to the following:

Monitoring Instrumentation

.

Radiation Controls

.

Housekeeping

.

Fluid :e/L3

.

Piping Vibrations

.

.- -

-_

_

_

- - _ , _ - _ . .

..

,

.

-

5

Hanger / Seismic Restraints

.

Clearance Tags

.

Fire Hazards

.

Control Room Manning

.

Annunciators

.

The operability of selected systems or portions of systems were

verified by walkdown of the accessible portions. The NRC inspector

verified the operability of the Alternate Cooling Method System.

No problems were identified during the system walkdown.

A.

Valve Not Sealed

On October 20,1981, at 2:20 p.m. MDT, during a tour of the

reactor building, the NRC inspector determined that V-22184,

Loop I Main Steam Electromatic Relief Valve Shutoff Valve,

was not sealed.

Reactor power was approximately 34%.

Procedure P-2 requires equipment to be returned to normal upon

return of a clearance. The normal position of V-22184 is as

stated in the Sealed Valves Checklist and,in accordance with Pro-

cedure OPOP III,is required to be in the sealed open position

when reactor power is greater than 2%.

A review of the Operations Log for October 15, 1981, indicated

that V-22184 was shut at 9:20 a.m. MDT, and reopened at 7:10 p.m.

MDT, during maintenance on V-22368, V-22184 Bypass. Clearance

number 2310, which returned Loop I to service, had been returned

at 5:45 p.m. MDT. The NRC inspector noted that the failure

to seal V-22184 upon completion of maintenance activities is a

repeated occurrence. The previous occurrence was documented in

IE inspection report 50-267/81-18, Appendix B, Paragraph 5.

The NRC inspector discussed the above item with the licensee

and informed the licensee that failure to follow procedures

'

which are Technical Specification requirements is considered

a violation.

(8124-01).

,

.

-

.-.

.-

,

.

-

6

,

B.

Removal of Station Battery 1A From Service

On September 11,1981, at 7:00 p.m. MDT, the licensee removed

station battery 1 A from service and placed it on routine over-

charge. However, the reactor was at power (greater than 2%)

and the 1B emergency diesel generator unit was out of service

for maintenance.

J

Technical Specification LC0 4.6.1.e) requires that while

operating at power one battery may be removed from service

i

for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> provided several conditions are met. One of

'

the required provisions is that both diesel-generators and

,

their associated essential buses be operable. However,

since diesel-generator 1B was out of service for replacement

1

of the outboard bearing on the clutch shaft of 1D engine ,

,

the removal of station battery lh from service constituted

a violation of the Technical Specifications.

(8124-02)

This violation was found by the'l.icensee and reported in

r portable Occurrence 81-058, dated October 9,1981. The

e

reportable occurrence also delineated the corrective action

completed by the licensee to return the battery to service

at 11:45 p.m. MDT, on September 11, 1981, and to preclude

.

further occurrences of this type.

Since the licensee has completed the corrective action for

this item and has been reviewed by the NRC, the licensee is

not required to respond.

The NRC inspector had no additional questions in this area.

4.

Surveillance (Monthly)

The NRC inspector reviewed all aspects of su weillance testing

involving safety-related systems. The review included observation

and review relative to Technical Soecification requirements. The

surveillance tests reviewed and observed were:

SR 5.4.1.3.4.b-M

Circulator Penetration Pressure Test

SR 5.4.1.3.1.b-M

Circulator Speed (Steam and Water) Test

SR 5.1.6-W

Core Safety Limit

SR 5.4.7.3.2.b-M

Feedwater Flow Test

SR 5.8. led-Q

Radioactive Gaseous Effluent System Calibration

SR 5.4.1.1.4c-D/5.4.1.4.2c-D Linear Power Channel Heat Balance Calibration

SR 5.4.1.1.8.b-M

Reheat Scram Temperature Scram Test

SR 5.4.1.1.8c-R

Reheat Steam Temperature Scram Calibration

~.

-

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ - , _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ __ _ ._. _ _ _ - _ _ _. _ ,.

.

-

7

A.

Fire Retardant Cabinets

During a review of the licensee's calibration records on

September 28,1981, the NRC inspector noted that locking

devices were being installed on the storage cabinets. The

NRC inspector's review of the licensee's records indicated

that the licensee had determined via a Quality Assurance

Deficiency Report (QA-DR 669, dated June 1980) that measures

were necessary to ensure the safekeeping of these permanent

working records as required by ANSI N45.2.9.

The cabinet

locks were installed as a result of the licensee's Corrective

Action-Action Request (CA-AR 209, dated June 1981).

During

this reporting period through a review of the ANSI /ASME

N45.2.9-1979 concerning records storage requirements, the NRC

inspector determined that the cabinets used to store the

permanent instrument calibration records, as defined by

QA-DR 669, do not meet the minimum two hour fire rating requirement.

The above item was discussed with the licensee and the

licensee was informed that this mattter is considered an

unresolved item.

(8124-03)

B.

Unattended Sources

On October 30,1981, at 9:00 a.m. MST, the NRC inspector

determined that two calibration sources had been left

unattended in the turbine building.

During the observation

of SR 5.8. led-Q, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent System Cali-

bration, the NRC inspector accompanied the Health P'ysics

n

and Results Technicians.

During the process of obtaining

the needed calibration sources, one source, number 184,

was not in the source storage room and was later located

on level 6 of the turbine building. The NRC inspector

noted that the Health Physics personnel assigned to the

source was not in the area and that another source, number 92,

had also been left unattended.

Procedure HPP-20 requires

calibration sources not to be left unattended outside their

storage room.

Both source numbers 184 and 92 are CS 137

with activity levels measured December 1,1980, of 8.6 E + 3//Ci

and 7.98 E + 4N Ci, respectively.

Both sources were locked

in their respective shielded containers.

The NRC inspector discussed the above item with the licensee

and informed the licensee that failure to follow procedures

which are Technical Specification requirements is considered

a violation.

(8124-04)

The NRC inspector had no additional questions in this area.

-.

-

_ _ - _

.__

-

.

8

5.

Maintenance (Monthly)

The NRC inspector reviewed records and observed work in progress to

ascertain that the following maintenance activities were being conducted

in accordance with approved procedures, Technical Specifications, and

appropriate Codes and Standards. The following maintenance activities

were reviewed and observed:

CN-1313

Radiation Monitors

CN-1314

Buffer Helium Piping - Loop Split

!

PM 48.1

ACM Diesel Generator Set K-4804 Semi-Annual

Preventive Maintenance

i

PTR 6-59

Remove and Test Snubber BFS-398 E in accordance

with MP 98-1, Repair of Hydraulic Pipe Snubbers

CWP 81-251/CN GSAR 243 Remove V-ll39 and Associated Piping and

Valves from System

CWP 81-250/CN 1427 Isolation of Penetration B-2-3

PTR 10-337

Repair HV 2245 in accordance with EMP 39,

Change Out Rotork Switch Mechanism from Mark l

to Mark 2

.

TCR-811033

Changes to PPS for CN 1427 to comply with

requirements of LCO 4.4.1

,

TCR-81031

Changes for Pressurization Control of Interspace

Pressure for Penetration B-2-3

PTR 10-338/MP-21

Maintenance and Repair of Backup Bearing Water

Pump Suction Filter

PM 91.2

Hydraulic Pump and Motor Inspection

No violations or deviations were identified.

6.

IE Circular

The NRC inspector verified by record review, observation and discussion

with the licensee, the action taken in response to IE Bulletins.

The following Circular was reviewed:

.

81-13 Torque Switch Electrical Bypass Circuit for Safeguard Service

Valve Motors. The licensee has determined that the type of design

used at Fort St. Vrain does not utilize the Torque Switch Bypass.

No violations or deviations were identified.

.

,,-.n,

. , . - ~ - - ,

,,a-,

, , . ,

~,,,,.,,,,,,,,~,,e.

.,-,,,,,-,,..--.,.n..,-,-n

-,.n--

, _ _ ,

n

,,.ww

,

n,-

e

.,.- -

~,e

-

e

.

_ .

-

9

7.

Review of Licensee Event Reports

The NRC inspector reviewed licensee event reporting activities to

verify that they were in accordance with Technical Specification,

Section 7, including identification details, corrective action,

review and evaluation of aspects relative to operations and accuracy

of reporting.

The following reports were reviewed by the inspector:

80-52

81-017

81-010

81-043

81-015

81-051

8.

Feport Reviews

The NRC inspector reviewed the following reports for content,

reporting requirements and adequacy:

Monthly Operating Information Report, September 1981

Monthly Operations Reports, September 1981

No violations or deviations were identified.

9.

Unresolved Items

Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required

in order to escertain whether they are acceptable items, violations

or deviations. The unresolved items disclosed in this inspection

are:

8124-03 in paragraph 4.A

8124-05 in paragraph 2, Item 1

8124-06 in paragraph 2, Item 3

10.

Exit Interview

Exit interviews were conducted at the end of various segments of

this inspection with Mr. D. Warembourg, Manager, Nuclear Production,

and/or other members of the Public Service Company staff. At the

interviews, the inspector discussed the findings indicated in the

previous paragraphs. The licensee acknowledged these findings.

,

(

,* .-

-..,w-m-,-,_,,,.-cm.,,,.

.-,.,,,,.,-w,

,,-,-,.,--%-%,,.,r---.y#--,,w-,,,-,

. . . * * *7-v'Fw*fP=*7****-"T--N-"**'9-"Mw

-*w

v

vW- * * * - ' '*"'i9"-"T4"a-wr

w,

-