ML20033C565
| ML20033C565 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/13/1981 |
| From: | Spencer G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Danielson D NAVY, DEPT. OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20033C566 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112030435 | |
| Download: ML20033C565 (2) | |
Text
.
f y
,m yy 1:3 y
g y
y7 yy NOV 131981 1
License No. 46-09611-01 6
M b @E 4D 2
Department of the Navy 6gy. --
Weapons Quality Engineering Center gg'3
[.7 Naval Torpedo Station
(
8 '-
Keyport, Washington 98345
\\
g ssmJ/h.l*$g[s Attention: Mr. Donald Danielson, Director W
Weapons Quality Engineering Center Gentlemen:
Subject:
NRC Inspection This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Ms. B. Riedlinger of this office on November 3,1981 of activities authorized by NRC License No. 46-09611-01 and to the discussion of our findings held by Ms. Riedlinger with you and Mr. Rodney Reed of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel and observations by the inspector.
During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities appeared to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements. The items and references to the pertinent requirements are listed in Appendix A.
These items have been categorized into severity levels as described in the Federal Register Notice (45 FR 66754) dated October 7, 1980.
s In addition to the need for corrective action regarding the specific iters of noncompliance included in Appendix A, we are concerned about the implementation of your management control system that permitted the items of noncompliance to occur. Consequently, in your reply you should describe in particular those actions taken or planned to inprove the effectiveness of your overall management control system.
Your response to this notice is to be submitted in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A, Notice of Violation.
8112030435 811113 NMS LIC30 46-09611-01 FDR
[6)7
.r
$!dg.
,ggl,
f l
I
.)
RIEDLItGER THOM/d rumm) s
..../..g/81 1 /lF/81 11/fV/81 11/
om>
31/S/E l nsc rosu m no so,nau o24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
"-32*
- fiOV 10 E31 Department of the Navy,
We have adopted a new NRC enforcement policy, as described in the Federal R uister Notice (45 FR 66754) dated October 7, 1980. With the adoption of that policy we are requiring, under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, that responses to Notices of Violations be submitted under oath or affirmation. Therefore, the last paragraph of your letter should include a statement equivalent to the following:
"I certify that all information contained in this letter, including any supplements attached thereto, is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."
DATE SIGriATURE TIlJE The signature should be notarized.
Our offices have recently moved.
I call your attention to the new mailing address on the letterhead above.
If you have any questions on this matter or concerning this inspection, please telephone B. Riedlinger on 415-943-3700.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Sincerely,
- 0. gut ignd F,,
H. L Ec3 George S. Spencer, Director Division of Technical Inspection
Enclosure:
Appendix A - Notice of Violation bcc: DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIOS)
Distributed by RV:
State of WA; RHE; A. Johnson (w/ enc)
LFMB (w/o enc)
.i h
5 9