ML20033B836
| ML20033B836 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1981 |
| From: | Mcclung C CARSTENS, A.S., FLEMMING, ANDERSON, MCCLUNG & FINCH, GUARD |
| To: | Kelley J Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112020326 | |
| Download: ML20033B836 (2) | |
Text
4 o
FLEMI NG, AN DERSO N, McCtU p4_GEt FINC H
.. w com.aer.o-.
....r-c.. -....e w C HAR LES E. M c CLUNG e 3 00 E. COLORADO SLvD. SufTE 704 CLirFOR D R. ANDERSON,J R.e 24012 CALLE DE LA PLATA, SUITE 33 0 CLAR E NC E E. FLE M t NG, J R.
PasADEfuA CAIFORNIA S1101 LAGUNA HILLS, CAlgRNgg3 {} ldh M m..m. so4-Ono LEE W. SALISBURY (764)768-3608 SID NEY M. WYS E 4 HAR LE S E. McCLUN G, J R.
Or COUNSEL STEVEN st. JOM hSON
- ;m;; 7] { f PLEAS E REPLY 70; p
w -
e a peorEs.iosm com.omariose I-
,f p?
November, 24, 1981 gy
- 1 s
6 i
7 L-
$3Y DEC1 uAgus4[o.
Chairman James L. Kelley, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Boa p
o; U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commis o
8
)/
Washington D.C. 20555
-g Re: Southern California Edison Company, et al (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos: 50-361 OL, 50-362 OL
Dear Chairman Kelley:
This letter shall serve as a written request to you for an extension time for the intervenors to file their Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with respect to the emergency planning issues in the above referenced licensing
. earings.
The Pindings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the intervenors were to be served by regular mail on November 20, 1981 pursuant to a stipulation contained at Transcript page 11, 357.
Intervenors respectfully request to be granted an extension pursuant to your powers contained in 10 CFR Section 2.718 until Tuesday, November 24 with service on the parties and the Board by expedited delivery.
This will in effect mean that the findings will be in the hands of the NRC and parties only two days later than they would have been pursuant to the original stipulation.
The reason for the necessity of the extension is logistical problems of having two attorneys working on separate parts of the ca'se putting their work product together, getting it typed up and served on the parties.
5 I contacted Mr. Richard Hoefling for the NRC staff and Mr. David Pigott for the Applicants on Friday, November j/(3 20, by phone and informed them of our late filing.
I was 8112020326 811124 PDR ADOCK 05000361 0
Chairman James L. Kelley, Esq.
November 24, 1981 Page Two unable, however, to obtain a stipulation accordingly I am making this request directly-to the Board.
I told them I would file on Monday, November 23, but I missed the-Federal Express drop by Eve minutes, accordingly this request is for an additional day.
The. granting of this request directly affects the NRC staff filing and Intervenors would of course stipulate to an additional day for that.
Any additional time granted to the NRC would directly affect the filing of any rebuttal finding by the Applicants.
Intervenors submit that a one or two day delay in the filing of the Applicants rebuttal papers will not prejudice them in any way due to their low power testing options and the fact that recent developments at the plant, ie, senior operators failing to pass the NRC exams may cause slippage of their schedule independent of the hearings.
I appreciate your consideration of this request.
Very truly yours, Charles E. Mc Clung, Jr.
Charles E. McClung, Jr.
CEM:pab e