ML20033B603

Requests Attendance at 811217 Meeting to Discuss Program Schedules,Performance & Major Milestones to Completion of Integrated Plant Safety Assessment

ML20033B603
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	11/27/1981
From:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Hoffman D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
TASK-***, TASK-RR LSO5-81-11-080, LSO5-81-11-80, NUDOCS 8112010558
Download: ML20033B603 (6)

Text

4 0

November 27, 1981 Docket !!o. 50-155 LS05-81 11 -080

[ ui eK[Mih 3 2

Mr. David P. Hoffman gg0l qf Nuclear Licensing Administrator

"'4 % gIk ~

Consumers Power Company g

1945 W. Parnall Road Jackson, titchigan 49201 1)/

SUBJECT:

SEP REDIRECTION AND TOPIC COMPLETION SCHEDULES -

BIG ROCK POINT On November 3,1980 e meeting was held between representatives of the SEP Owners Group and Dairyland Power and HRC senior management, including the Executive Director for Operations. At that meeting, the owners proposed to assume more of the SEP topic review responsibility which would result in completing their review of 60% of the SEP Topics by June 30, 1981. On January 14, 1981 the staff approved the owners group " lead topic" approach for a 90 day trial period after which the staff would evaluate the quality and progress of the licensee's topic reviews. Due to the limited number of topic assessments received by the staff during the 90 day period, the staff decided to extend the trial period until June 30,1981.

Our letter dated July 7,1981, indicated a concern for the success of P

the redirected SEP program. Our concern was based on the quantity of licensee topic assessments received versus that which was promised by L

June 30,1981, and the quality of those topic assessments. In that letter we stated that only one half of the assessments received by June f

15, 1981 were useful due to their poor quality and that an insufficient number of topic assessments had been received to judge the overall success of SEP redirection. Therefore, we requested a meeting with licensee management to assure that the owners were providing sufficient resources to support SEP redirection and to assure that licensee topic safety analysis reports (SARs) would be completed according to proposed schedules. At the meeting the staff requested that each licensee provide their schedules, if different from the staff's proposed schedules, for the completion and submittal of the remaining SEP topics SARs for their facilities.

S4*4 gd:SehdL fl 8112010558 811127 SSM MSA 5% (IT)

DR ADOCK 05000155 PDR omcc) sunruar.b oney anc ronu m nog Nncu o2e OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usa.m n_m

\\

Your letter dated August 24, 1981, provided your schedules. However, as of November 13, 1981, we have received only 6 of 10 SARs scheduled.

In addition, you have not met your proposed schedules for providing information necessary to complete NRC originated topics or coments on previously isseed draft evaluations. Enclosure 1 is a graph (from NUREG-0485, SEP Status Summary Report) of your actual submittals by month and your scheduled sub-mittals. Enclosure 2 is the similar graph for all SEP licensees. As shown by these enclosures, significant delays are occurring and a substantial effort on your part is required to minimize further delay. Based on your perfonnance in meeting schedules, we cannot assume that the remaining topic SARs will be completed and submitted as promised.

Therefore, we are requesting that your senior management attend a meeting with other SEP licensee senior management and.1RC senior management planned for December 17, 1981, at which the perfonnance, program schedules and major milestones to completion of the Integtated Plant Safety Assessment for each of the SEP plants will be discussed.

Sincerely, l

Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure:

See next page 1

l l

l l

l I

See previous concurrence sheet r

omce>

.........................g...2,.7........

st.aunue )

DOTE )

l nau ronu ais oa-so> sacu om OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam mi-meeo

k Docket flo. 50-155 LS05 Mr. David P. Hoffman

?fuclear Licensing Administrator Consumers Povt r Company 1945 U Parnall Rcad Jackson, Michigan 49201

SUBJECT:

SEP REDIRECTION AND TOPIC C0"PLETI0li SCHEDULES -

BIG ROCK PO!?!T fly letter dated July 7,1981, the staff indicated a concern regarding the success of the redirected SEP program. Our concern was based on the avantity of licensee topic assessments received versus that which was promised by June 30, 1981, ' and the quality of those topic assessments.

In that letter we requestod a meeting with licensee canacenent to assure that the owners are providing sufficient resources to support SEP redirection and to assure that licensce topic safety analysis reports (SARs) would ba conpleted accordine to proposed schedules. At that r'eeting the staff requested that each licensee provide their schedules, if different from the staff's proposed schedules, for the completion and subnittal of the remaining SEP topic SARs for their facilities.

Tour letter dated Auoust 24, 1981, provided your schedules. However, as of flovember 13, 1931, we have received only 6 of the 10 SARs scheduled.

In addition, you have not met your proposed schedules for providing infan ation necessary to complete NRC originated topics or convents on previously issued draft evaluations. Enclo-sure 1 is a graph (fron NUREG-0435, SEP Status Sumary Report) of your actual submittals by rTnth and your scheduled submittals. Enclosure 2 is the similar graph for all SEP licensees. As shown by these enclosures, significant delays are occurring and a substantial effort on your part is required to ninimize furtber delay. Based on your perfornance in rieeting schedules, we cannot assure that the renaining topic SARs will be completed and submitted as promised.

l Therefore, we are requesting that your senior mananenent attend a neeting with other SEP licensee senior management and MRC senior ranagement planned for December 17, 1991, at which the performance, program schedules and major mile-stones to coNetion of the Integrated Plant Safety Assessment for each of the SEP plants will he discussed.

Sincerely, i

A i(previous yellow for additional concurrences.

e 3

DL D:DL i

Glainas DEisenhut I

11/10 /81 11/ /81 i

yy

-,ci.

. m u.n.

m cwn

.. gg.g..... 3y{.y.5.1.?n 9Qgh.y,9 l

omczy g.g g....

.H'i K ' ' '"'

....g.g.y.3.p.,.g.;.. g...st3tEU" "RSc.helhdk* GCwa1 ir<a*"

"WRusse1N"- WPau-1 son *""

DCrutdlifisTd sua m e>

...l.ll.l.9/Al..j.....l.ll.l.9/81....

.11/.19/81..

1.1/.19/81 -

j..H/28/8b--

omy nac renu m oodkWuinb'

~ "

"'6FFidl AL R ECO R D. CO PY uso-o. mi-m+o

~.

Docket No. 50-155 LS05,

Mr. David P. Hof fnan Nuclear Licensing Adninistrator Consumers Power Conpany 1

1945 W Parnall Road Jackson, Hichigan 49201

SUBJECT:

SEP REDIRECTION AND TOPIC C0tiPLET10N SCHEDULES -

BIG ROCK POINT By letter dated July.7.1981 the staff indicated a concern regarding the success t

of the redirected SEP progran. Our concern was based on the quantity of licensee' topic assessments received versus that which was promised by June 30,1981 and the quality of those topic assessnents.

In that letter we requested a neeting j

with licensee nanagenent to assure that the owners are providing sufficient i

resources to support SEP redirection and to assure that licensee topic safety analysis reports (SARs) would be completed according to proposed schedules. At that meeting the staff requested that each lit.ensee prwide their schedules, if different from the staff's proposed schedules, for tim completion and submittal of the remaining SEP topic SARs for their facilities.

Your letter dated August 24, 1981 provided your schedules. However, as of llovember 13, 1981 ve have received only 6 of the 10 SARs scheduled. In addition, you have not met your propsed schedules for providing information necessary to complete HRC originat~' topics or comoents on previcusly issued draft evaluations. Enclo-sure 1 is a graph (fron HUREG-04L5, SEP Status Summary Report) of your actual submittals by conth and your scheduled submittals. Enclosure 2 is the similar I

graph for all SEP licensees. As shown by these enclosures, significant delays are occurring and a substantial effort on your part is required to nininize further I

delay. Based on your perfornance in neeting schedules, we cannot assume that I

the remaining topic SARs will te completed and submitted as prtriised.

I Therefore, we are req.uesting that your senior management attend a neeting with other SEP licensee senior management und NR senior management planned for l

December 17, 1981 to discuss your performance, progran schedules and najor milestones to completion of Big Rock Point Integrated Plant Safety Assessment.

Sincerely, AD:SA:DL D:DL Glainas DEisenhut 11/ /81 11/ /81 narrn11 n_ riwnent_ ni rnetn r Division of Licensina I

omce)

..g g....5@'E"'

'SEP 'B ' ' ' 'OR

!M"

' ORB #5fBC" "*

.....b,s..[........

sURNOME) {gg.] gggpp g.... Q..g gg ggf....

1:dk GCwallna

......WRussell WPaulson DCrutchfield

• * * """"TL T Clm""l"" E""""""+ "HTM8T'" - "1TTff/81" '

'TT7tr78T'"

'TT7/Cf/8T" ' E "/H1"'_' "

Nac ronu sia t G-80) NRCM O:A OMICIAL RECORD COPW

/

i us - i- -

s Mr. David P. Hoffman cc Mr. Paul A. Perry, Secretary U. C. Environmental, Protection '--

Consumers Power Company Agency 212 West Michigan Avenue Federal Activities Branch Jackson, Michigan 49201 Region V Office.

ATTN: Regional Radiation Representative Judd L. Bacon, Esquire 230 South Dearborn Street Consumers Power Company Chicago, Illinois 60604 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan _ 49201 Herbert Grossman, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Joseph Gallo, Esquire U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Isham, Lincoln & Beale Washington, D. C.

20555 1120 Connecticut Avenue.

Room 325 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Washington, D. C.

20036, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

. Peter W. Steketee, Esqvire,

Washington, D..C.

20555 505 Peoples Building Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Washington, D. C.

20555 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C.

20555 Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant ATTN: Mr. C. J. Hartman Mr. John O'Neill, II Plant Superintendent Route 2, Box 44 Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Maple City, Michigan 49664 Christa-Maria Charlevoix Publ.ic Library Route 2, Box 108C 107 Clinton Street Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Charlevoix, Micnigan William J. Scanlon, Esquire Chairman 2034 Pauline Boulevard County Board of Supervisors Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 Charlevoix County Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Resident Inspector Big Rock Point Plant Of'fice of the Governor (2) c/o U.S. NRC Room 1 - Capitol Building RR #3, Box 600 Lansing, Michigan 48913 Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Mr. Jim E. Mills Herbert Semel.

Counsel for Christa Maria, et al.

Route 2, Box 108C Urban Law Institute Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Antioch School of Law 263316th Street, NW Washington, D. C.

20460 n / !k */OL N

/

Mr. David P. Hoffman r

CC Dr. John H. Buck Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear r,egulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

'Ms. JoAnn Bier 204 Clinton Street Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Thomas S. Moore Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

,2 :

Washington, D. C, 20555 4

4 e

D e

9 e

9 e

e d

9

/

?

I t

[1 e

L r

U

~

J uso 0

1 U

2 c

i n

J L

J E

0 12 Y

AM 1

0 2

RP A

1 0

2 R

A S

M L

4 1

A 2

T B

i E

T F

I 7

MT 1

1 N

BI N

O e

A UP J

SH

)

K SC T

4 N

1 6

2 O

O 1

R 3

M

. (

Ed C

EB i

E i

D

~

f S

5 N

5 1

E VO C

i N

/

I 0

L 1

4 i

T CO 4

2 6

4 PE i

S k"

2 2

2 2

u E

IA 0

O O

0 S

i J

L L

U A

T T

I t9 0

0 0

0 2

NU J

8 5

5 5

8 5

g 4

3 2

N 1

1 t

l t

l e

a a

e g

u g

u r

t r

t a

c a

c T

A T

A EV T

L H

I E

A T

T C

U N

A R

T A

C O

L M

U T

A M

R U

E C

P b

te us w rx w rTs f,

~

i LICENSEE TOPIC SUBMITTALS ta =xt s.esittAJ 2N a---

7g

/#

tu -

.L I

/

im T A m:-

/

ind

/

i

/

'" T

/

"I

/

r

~

i

/

53 -

/

1. }

/

/

j y.>

n ALc sEP oc7 oct DC JAN FD nWt AM MAY J.M R

soms Twget 2

31 SS 26 20 27 4

8 4

0 0

1 0

PER MONTH Actuat 2

21 5

37 Tweet 2

33 98 124 144 171 175 133 187 137 137 138 1st CUMut.ATIVE 2

23 28 65 Actunt i

e r

i s

--