ML20033B540
| ML20033B540 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/27/1981 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Counsil W CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20033B541 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-***, TASK-RR LSO5-81-11-075, LSO5-81-11-75, NUDOCS 8112010505 | |
| Download: ML20033B540 (3) | |
Text
.-
November 27, 1981 Docket No. 50-213 LS05 91 ll-075 ph Mr. W. G. Counsil, Vice President N Dg
/SSJg M f:uclear Engineering and Operations 1
Connecticut Yankee Atonic y,g i
Post Office Box 270 g
Hartford, Connecticut 06101 b
Dear Mr. Counsil:
J SUPJECT: SEP PEDIRECTIO'4 A'!D TOPIC C0"PLETIO!! SCPEDblES -
HADDAM !!ECK By letter dated July 7,1981, the staff indkated a concern regarding the success of the redirected SEP progran. Our concern was based on the quantity of licensee topic assesscents received versus that which was pronised by June 30, 1981, and the quality of those topic assessments.
In that letter we requested a necting with Itcensee management to assure that the owners are providing sufficient resources to support SEP redirection and to assure that licensee topic safety analysis reports (SARs) would ba completed according to proposed schedules. At that reeting the staff requested that each licensee provide their schedules, if different from the staff's proposed schedules, for the cmpletion and subr.ittal of the remaining SEP topic SARs for their facilities.
Your letter dated July 29, 1981, provided your schedules. As of Novenher 13, 1081, we have received 22 of the 27 SARs scheduled. Enclosure 1 is a graph (from FUREG-04"i, SEP Status Sunnary Report) of your actual subnittals by nonth and your scheduled submittals. Enclosure 2 is the sinilar graph for all SEP licensees. As shown by these enclosures, delays are occurring and some addi-tional effort on your part is required to mininize further delay. Based on overall licensee performance in necting schedules, we cannot assume that the reaining topic SACS will be completed and submitted as promised.
Therefore, we are requestinq that your senior managecont attend a recting with other SEP licensee senior nanageuent and !SC senior nanage~ent planned for Deccaber 17, 1981, at which the perfomance, procran schedules and na.ior nile-stones to completion of the Integrated Plant Safety Assess.'ent for each of the SEP plants will te discussed.
3f04 Add: dicka els Sincerely 884
- Seepreviousyelh.4:
I w for aaditional concurrences.'
n RB#5:BC AD DL D:DL 9S# *U4 4 (s#-)
,y DCrutchfield GLdinas DEisenhut 11/2p/81 11/tp/81 11/ /81 I
8112010505 811127 Darrell G. Eisshut, Director DR ADOCK 05000 Division of Licensing SEPB:DL SEPB:DL SEPB:DL ORB #5;PM
....'E!.'.C.lsu,re,:, A,s,,,s,ta,,ta1,,
.?.
omca.
SBrown:dk*
GCwalina*
WRussell*
WPaulson*
SURNAME)
.gf 7 gp
....c.p g..
........ ~......... * *.
1.1.a9L8,1,,,,,,,..!.141,9/8,],,,,,, ],]L],9/3,1,_,,_ ],w,9/3J,,__,
om>
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCMOuo OFF1C'lAL RECORD COPY usom mi-mm
i
- Your ' letter dated July 29, 1981, provided your schedules. As of November 13, 1981, we have received 22 of the 27 SARs scheduled. Enclosure 1 is a graph (from NUREG-0485, SEP Status Summary Report) of your actual sub-mittals by month and your scheduled submittals. Enclosure 2 is the sim-Ilar graph for all SEP licensees. As shown by these enclosures, delays are occurring and some additional effort on your part is required to minimize further delay. Bai;ed on overall licensee performance in meeting schedules, we cannot assume that the remaining topic SARs will be completed and submitted as promised.
Therefore, we are requesting that your senior management attend a meeting with other SEP licensee senior management and NRC senior management planned for December 17, 1981, at which the performance, program schedules and major milestones to completion of the Integrated Plant Safety Assessment for each of the SEP plants will be discussed.
Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page See previous concurrences.
0
. (jrk'
.,,,e SURNAME)
.1/
om>
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM OM3 O FFiCIAL R ECO'.1D COPY usc. m m i.- m.=
Docket No. 50-213 L505 Mr. W. G. Counsil. Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Operations Connecticut Yankee Ato:aic Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101
Dear Mr. Counsil:
SUBJECT:
SEP REDIRECTION AHD TOPIC COMPLETI0!! SCHEDULES -
HADDAM HECK By letter dated July 7,1981 the staff indicated a concern regarding the success of the redirected SEP progran. Our concern was based on the quantity of licensee topic assessnents received versus that which was promised by June 30,1981 and the quality of those topic assessments. In that letter we requested a meeting with licensee management to assure that the owners are providing sufficient resources to support SEP redirection and to assure that licensee topic safety analysis reports (SARs) would be completed according to proposed schedules. At that meeting the staff requested that each licensee provide their schedules, if different from the staff's proposed schedules, for the completion and submittal of the remaining SEP topic SARs for their facilities.
Your letter dated July 29, 1981 provided your schedules. As of Itovember 13, 1981 we have received 22 of the 27 SARs scheduled. Enclosure 1 is a graph (from HUREG-0485, SEP Status Summary Report) of your actual submittals by nonth and your scheduled submittals. Enclosure 2 is the similar graph for all SEP j'
licensees. As shown by these enclosures, delays are occurring and sone addt-tioral effort on your part is required to nininize further delay. Based on overall licensee perfornance in reeting schedules, we cannot assune that the remaining topic SARs will be conpleted and subnitted as promised.
Therefore, we are requesting that your senior nanagement attend a meeting with other SEP licensee senior nanagenent and liRC senior management planned for Decenber 17, 1981 to discuss your perfomance, progran schedules and najor milestones to completion of Haddan Neck Integrated Plant Safety Assessment.
Sincerely, ORB #5:DL:BC AD:SA:2L D:DL DCrutchfield Glainas DEisenh't 11//f/81 11/ /81 11/ /81 Darrell G. Eisenhut. Director Division of Licensing hhv
.gg, g.g...
Enclosure:
hs stated SEPB:IA F SEPB:DL SEPB:DL.'g.)....
ORp S M
..g.g.
...g.g....
omco suR-o cc.u/4nc osure..... w...t. m~ e............
11!!....... 7,.!.81..
1.............
11.l.fl.81,,
1,1,/g /,81....
.11.Id.l.81.....
OFFIClAL RECORD COPY usom im-sam NRC FORM 318 (10-a0) NRCM o80