ML20032E215
| ML20032E215 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1981 |
| From: | Hose S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8111190857 | |
| Download: ML20032E215 (3) | |
Text
-
e
's 3 '4 7 f, 5 2 3 6
l c7f-fV.:-
~31 CCT21 P5 57 Da 0.:7:Ci 0F 3E0tE
- 0CEig'. YEP.'. '.
,;;,;ff*
Ptease!& maeA a rek' hor sah;f' cue hads. Ledk be sa fiay be.l; eve.+kat Gect ih te
'ed f
air our I;aes to be s4 en +Agn dll this radjaacNaccravh ess. L fp wovld, csl Icole -f ae +he + ruth-ylic o u yj And th lerse.dox Y t on D.~a
\\
\\
CAhycn or ahy OHke. othevn udeqr fwerpl. cats.
llvleestcyhdhg yours.hhch, i
.Scalbdcac-]CkA i
1
s:
e
'n!
.s c
Q x
A' Sy Q
f:
y a
b Noy3gggm N CI.IAI ;C7T.2:
AU IWA3:CN CF.:R*7ATI ;RC;IA!" k 4tenwen%,.
A
- %am (thisinfor=aticsisfrc:3articlesbyJohn[G;cf:an,M.O.,;h.5<)
(
/
s The advocates of nuclear ;cwer have convinced such of the publiy,
&y p '
N
- hat nuclear power can sake a significant centributicn to ca:icnal affanence.
The " benefit versus risk" doctrine, which is used Oc just:,fy nuclea ;o we;',
13.a.dangercus assault against human rights and sust be rejected.
- clains that a certain number of citizens and future individuals can be "legany" kined by polluters because that is anagecly the only way f.or " society" to =ee its scal of affluence and a "hsalthy ecenemy".
In retur: for a
" social benefit", the gover==ent win anow itself an: varicus corpora:icca to impose " risks" (deaths, or premeditated randes surders) upc individuals w1:hout their consent and is spite of their objecticas.
This vicicus doctrine could take us anywhere.
Cnce we per=1 the killing of individuals for scme an aged sccial benefit, there is no difference between the way we think and the way of the Nazis, who asser ed it was a great social benefi:
to exter**aate the gypsies (amens others).
A policy which condenes killing for the sake of =aistaining or increasing the ccuatry's affluence will be s1=;17 sauseating to a:y reader who pauses tc :"*
'e about it.
3y ecutrast, the 1::::1se of indivi:ual human rignes says that every individual, equany, has the right to be free frca coercien by other aumann.
The ;rtacipal of initiating no coercica is what protects an af our cherished rights, including free speech; af ter an, it takes feree to prevent free speech.
And when polluters invade cur bodies and other property against eur wills, it is an act of force and a violatics of our human rights-a violation which can sever be justified by "scciety.'s desire for a heal:ty econc=y, affluence, or progress.
Iach individual's primary ;:ivate pre;er:y is his own bcdy.
The reases that we have the ridh: Oc interfere with the freedo= cf polluters is this:
their use of their own private prc;erty is resul:1.9g is an invasien of cur private property (cur bodies) by the poisons they release.
The :cliuters 11:e."J'e* 31atics is invading cur
~
sI are ecmM ttias trestass acrcss the crecer:7 bocios without our causent.
'/igorous defense of cur cwn private ;rc;erty rights is the foundatics of the " anti-nuclear movemen ".
Readers =ust understand that nuclear power represents a giant expert =en:
upcn the entire ;c;ulatica.
- consists of finding out whether or so the nuclear ;cwer industry can c0=:ais its radicactive ;cisc:s with virtual h)\\
t perfectics, year in and year cut, regardless of =echanical errors, human errers, carelessness, = alice, insanity, and natural disasters.
.;uclear ;cwer cwners/
operators are ccercing everyone, wining er so, to serve as guinea pigs in their =cestreus experisent.
Inforced guinea-piggery is as obvicus ticlatics of hu=as rights, ecc.
There is ac:hing " hysterical" abou pec;1e wec insist upon their right, and the right of all.childres a c future individuals, :c he free frc= trespass, guinea-piggery, and ;cliciec Of ;rc=eci:ated urder.
d 1
.r e
DO THESE EMISSIONS INDICATE A CONCERN SY PG&E ABOUT THE MARINE FOOD CHAINI PC&E has re aopiied to dumo rne staumum Stancardized Limit which is tentarise before the E.P.A.; some of the beasy metals and chemicals listed are not even invois ed in nuc! ear operation. Af ter ion euchange and filtration treatment of hignly radioactiv e wastewater. PC& E wisnes to dump as much iallegedly low-iesels radioactive water as is permissible under the Ca. Adm. Code and N.R.C.
regulations. Besides Iedine 131. $trontium. Racium, P!utonium Tntium and others ieither dissolved or bypassing the 5 micron filtert, PC&E wishes renewed permission to dump these emissions:
(numbers given are proposed emission pounds per day)
AR$4MC CSee MCKEL 23,388 CADMIUM 3548 5:\\%tR ate TOTAL CHROMauM 230s Z:NC 21.ees COPPER 5300 CYANOE 5000 LIAO 93ee PMENOLIC COMPOUNOS 35.00s
%4ERCURY 150 AMMONIA (as nitro 8en) 695.000 TOTAL CHLORINAffD Pf5TICIDES and PCe$s M v5ome of these i gures are a ndrecs of times above alloaable 'em.ts of the Oct.1960 f P. A. Amtpent u
ware Quaierv Stancarou Two examples of health effects are CACMlUM is a systemic po: son. mutagen, teratogen, and c.treinogen, bioconcentrating in fish to 2000 times that in ambient waters. CHROMlUM reduces photosvntnesis and kills diatoms (which are the basis of the food chain).
THERMAL SHOCK (thus the hot-cold flusn effect whien does not aid any species) of 20*F above ocean temperature, and at times 60*F above normal dunng demusselling, kills attached and other marine organisms. Touns accumulate in plant and animal life, including keic, fish, and she!! fish (your food). Nuclear shutdown would kill warmer water species.
JOIN THE PICKET 1.INE OUTSIDE THE HEARING 12:15 to 2:15 PM em