ML20032D386

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900058/81-02 on 810721-24 & 0810-14 & Notice of Nonconformance
ML20032D386
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/29/1981
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Grasso J
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP.
Shared Package
ML20032D387 List:
References
REF-QA-99900058 NUDOCS 8111130723
Download: ML20032D386 (2)


Text

- - ___

~

g 25 O Docket No. 99900058/81-02

%d8

$<f l)4,@\\

~

L Rockwell International Flow Control Division a NOV121981* g ATTN: Mr. J. V. Grasso

" w s. =J,T" -

General Plant Manager 1700 South Sanders St.

K

@/

l Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 U}

/

Gentlemen:

This mfers to the inspection conducted by Wm. D. Kelley of this office on July 21-24, 1981, at the Carolina Power and Light Company, Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2, and on August 10-14, 1981, of your facility at Raleigh, North Carolina, associated with the mpair and manufacture of main steam isolation valves and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made as a result of: (1) the issuance of a licensee event report by the Carolina Power and Light Company concerning a stem to stem disc separation in a main steam isolation valve installed at the Brunswick Steam Electric Station, Unit 2; and (2) the issumce of a licensee event report by the Georgia Power Company coccerning a stem to stem disc i

separation in a main steam stop valve installed at the E.I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 2.

I Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent mquimments are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written state-I ment containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items. (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures wem or will be completed. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for a good cause shown.

Ci The responsas directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance pro-3O\\

cedures of the Office of Management and Budget as requimd by the Paperwork iL/

Reduction Act of 1980 PL 96-511.

e111130723 811029

$0$W WQ

,,,,gIS,d[

...RIS.,

.... VIB....lk.

..,.I E h...RII..

wna >

.... DIT V-

- summ >

. WDKelley/r

'"10721781" ~ """107%78T

'l0

/81 ""10/}B1' 'y,Q".10yl/81'"'10 HWhitner IBar s UPota ovs a liardo Col ns

~

81 ~,,,,,,,,

,4

...i.....-....

... ~...

NRC FORM 318 M80) NRCM O2a OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l

r

.c y

Rockwell International -

2 Flow Control Division In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

)

this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's j

Public Document Room. If 'this' report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary l

that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of i

this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) sub-mit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.

If your receipt of this letter has been-delayed such that _less than seven days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.

l ConsistentwithSection2.790(b)(1),anysuchapplicationmustbeaccompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement-of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).

The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we do not hear _ from yw in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Docum3nt Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, odQhwed

  • avr YdisPotapovs. Chief Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosure:

1.

Notice of Nonconformance 2.

Inspection Report No. 99900058/81-01 3.

Inspection Data Sheets - 5 pages

^

bec:

IE/V&SPB(Reinmuth)

IE Files AE0D NMSS NRC:PDR QAB Reg. Directors, I, II, III, V JEGagliardo, RIV ASME NBB&PVI

""C " "" * " ~ " ' " " * " *

  • OFFICIAL RECORD COPY j