ML20032C650
| ML20032C650 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1981 |
| From: | Pollock M LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | Brunner E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032C646 | List: |
| References | |
| SNRC-628, NUDOCS 8111100692 | |
| Download: ML20032C650 (4) | |
Text
7
.,e*
s e.
.m *-NWgmy
((E,g LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Euranzanrax2r.eu2msmsnered 17 5 EAST OLD COUNTRY ROAD
- H ICKSV1 LLE. NEW YORK 11800 MILLARD S. POLLOCK VICE PRE 5sDE NT-NUCLEAR SNRC-628 October 13, 1981 L
Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Projects Branch #1, Division of Resident and Project Inspection U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I 631 Park Avenue l
King of Prussia, PA 19406 NRC Inspection No. 81-14 i
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-322
Dear Mr. Brunner:
Th$s letter responds to your letter of September 14, 1981 which forwarded the report of the routine inspection of activities authorized by NRC License No. CPPR-95, conducted by Mr. Higgins of your office from August 1-31, 1981.
Your letter stated that it appeared that one of our activities was not con-ducted in full compliance with NRC requirements.
The apparent noncompliance and our response follow:
j Apparent Noncompliance with 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion V. FSAR Section 17.2.5, and the LILCO Quality Assurance Program Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with instructions in that on August 5-6, 1981:
1.
The inspector identified the following leads in Panel 601 lifted with no documentation in the Log or Tags hung:
-- Leads to pressure indicator E51-PI 001;
-- Two leads from cable Ell BBC 640;
-- Two leads from cable Ell BBC 641; and
-- Lead CC 75 to Terminal Board HH.
2.
The authorization block was not signed on tags #1528, 1529 and 1838.
8111100692 811027 PDR ADOCK 05000322 G
\\
LONG,lSLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Mr. Eldon J. Brunner October 13, 1981 Page Two 3
Two fuses were found installed in the Remote Shutdown Panel even though RED tags #30224 and 30225 specified that the fuses be pulled.
4.
BLUE startup jurisdictional tags were hung concurrently with YELLOW construction jurisdictional tags on a number of components of the F? actor Building Closed Loop Cooling Water Syctem (P42).
5.
None of the four active jumper / lifted lead permits had the expected duration recorded.
6.
The j umpers for Permit #81-6-1 had been removed but the permit and jumper log had not been updated.
7.
The Main Control Room set of controlled station procedures was not maintained current in that it contained Rev. 1 vice Rev. 2 of SP 12.035.01, " Control of Lifted Leads and Jumpers".
Corrective Action and Results Corrective action for each item cited except number five was completed prior to the conclusion of the inspection.
For number five, the expected duration has now been added to the four active j umper/ lifted lead permits.
Steps Taken to Prevent Recurrence With respect to items 1, 2 and 3, the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, and the I?LCO Startup Manua'l pertinent to the Lifted Wire / Temporary Jumper Drogram were re-emphasized at the Startup Ceneral Staff Meeting on September 8,1981, and appropriate written guidance for implementing the Program has been provided to all Test Engineers and Technicians involved.
For item 4, LILCO reviews of simultaneous jurisdictional tagging have shown this to be an isclated instance.
A memorandum has been issued to site Construction and Startup personnel re-emphasizing the requirements of the Shoreh3a Startop Manual regarding Yellow and Blue j urisdictional tagL ng.
With reference to item five, i
the Jumper / Lifted Lead Pernit fors has been modified to include an " expected duration" block to be completed during preparation of the permit.
Relativc to item 6, the importance of returning the tags on the lifted leads to Operations personnel in accordance with SP 12.035.01 has been re-emphasized to Plant Staff personnel, and for item seven, further instruction has been provided to the individuals reaponsible for procedure distribution.
Finally, the Operational Quality Assurance Section has commenced surveillance to assure proper program implementation in this area.
X
,f LONG,) BLAND UGHTING COMPANY Mr. Eldon J. Brunner October 13, 1981 Page Three Date Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance has been achieved.
Very t;ruly yours,
b M.
S. Pollock Vice President-Nuclear Attachment
)
ss.:
COUNTY OF NASSAU
)
MILLARD S. POLLOCK, being duly sworn, deposes and says that I am a Vice President of Long Island Lighting Company, the owner of the facility described in the caption above.
I have read the Notice of Violation dated September 14, 1981 and also the response thereto prepared under my direction dated October 13, 1981.
The facts set forth in said response are based upon reports and information provided to me by the employees, agents, and representatives of Long Island Lighting Company responsible for the activities described in said Notice of Violation and in said response.
I believe the facts set forth in said response are true.
YfYd4W ATILLARD S.
POLLOCK Sworn to before me this
/J"* day of 6cG/w 1981.
f$w/.w ((2dsid E O S.\\ LL E C L:'/
.~'C G f;ctarj l'Sie, c:::a ci Iba York f 0. ::-47:22C3 Qu;' led ict ThZ:u Cour'y Conmi.s..an opiccs Mar. 30,19...
L.
.