ML20032B988
| ML20032B988 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1981 |
| From: | Holzman R, James Smith AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8111060585 | |
| Download: ML20032B988 (2) | |
Text
&
.c.
r
!= u S8..W,.3 r
00f. METED Robert Holzman Jeffrey Smith 7
USHRC 6245 Stanley Ave. #H 1838' Torrey Pines Rc San Diego, CA 92115 La Jolla, CA 92037 u)
Oct a r 15, 1981 m
l
'81 OCT 23 A9:05 g'b(p s
q M
h
<..U OFFICE OF SECRETO
~
00CKEilNG & SERVIC i
NOVO 61985 -8 BRANCH
~
t.
/
UeSe POCuAR ttg
==*
ComMM Qgng
\\'
S N
Dear Sirs:
'/
After attending a recent meeting of the San Diego County-Board o Supervisors on September 29th addressing the issue of a 20 mile evacuation radius around the San Onofre Nuclear Facility, we became very weary of the the tacility.
0.D.P.'s emergency response plan for a nuclear disaster at It has recently been brought to our attention that indeed Southern California Edison is in violation of several N.R.C. requirements.
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and of Supervisor Paul Eckert, d to the fcet that the 0.D.P., twice during the aforementioned meeting eludeWe should also like to 10 mile evacuation plan is incomplete.
from Mr. Eckert to Carol Jahnkow.
the present ref'er you to the enclosed correspondence, is our understanding, af ter reading the N.R.C. requir It "The plar.s submitted must include a licensee, that Analysis Reporc" must be submitted.in section IV for the emergency planning description of elements set to demonstrate that plans provide reasonable out sufficient adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the zones, to an extent assurance that event of an emergency."
referred to is to you that an incomplete plan as Mr. EckertL is, and units II an We submit also inadequate, and therefore unit direct violation of N.R.C. code should they be licensed.
Another apparent violation to the N.R.C. code was revealed during the in response to questioning by Supervisor course of James Hunts testimony,is the head of the Office for Disaster Preparedness).
f._
Hedgecock.
(Hunt it would be approxinately one hour before a team could be e
ld be Hunt stated that assembled and decisions on action, such as public notificati taken.
on page VIII-2 (Dec. 1980).
. The design objective "By July 1, 1981, l notifica-The N.R.C. code states, shall be to have the capab U try to essentially complete the initia EPZ within about 15 tion to the public within the Plume exposure pathwayobviously by live minutes."
up to this standard.
ps ?
10 o
Posigbad s
S. o
e
~
Page 2 We call on you to carry out your civic duty to enforce tne law by revoking the license of San Onofre unit I and to deny licensing to units II
- and III.
For turther information about the inadequacies of the 0.D.P. plan please feel free co contact us.
Sincerely,
{l 1
(Y L
h/
vs.4 ge freyfsmiti[
Robert Holzman Enclosure
'al,
'$A d c,d S5 e.. O t 'a /" ^
l ' ** $ J a abJI S / S e [> 3 J
C. d G o; a. w c ('5 c w cx l
l l
s
.