ML20032B960

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Expresses Opinion That Facility Plans Are Incomplete & Violate NRC Requirements
ML20032B960
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  
Issue date: 10/15/1981
From: Holzman R, James Smith
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC
References
NUDOCS 8111060556
Download: ML20032B960 (2)


Text

.

p,-..-.....

O

.b I '~

' h.'.

l Jeffrey Smith 00LMETED Robert Holzman USHRC 6245 Stanley Ave. #H 1888" Torrey Pines Rt San Diego, CA 92115 La Jolla, CA 9203 {

4

c ' d'"

S' 1981 fQ &).i W ET 23 A9:05 e b/W M

N M

OFFICE OF SECRETAP'

& NOVO 61981m -e 00CKEilNG & SER'E BRAncu ua. m.,,, z

\\

Dear Sirs:

meeting of the San Diego County Board of Af ter attending a.recet.'

Supervisors on September 29th addressing the issue of a 20 mile evacuation radius around the San Onofre Nuclear Facility, we became very weary of the 0.D.P.'s emergency response plan for a nuclear disaster at the facility.

to our attention that indeed Southern It has recently been brought California Edison is in violation of several N.R.C. requirements.

Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and of Supervisor Paul Eckert, h fact that the 0.D.P., twice during the aforementioned meeting eluded to t ewe should also like to 10 mile evacuation plan is incomplete.

from Mr. Eckert to Carol Jahnkow.

the present refer you to the enclosed correspondence, is our understanding, af ter reading the N.R.C. requirements for a

" Final Safety-that before the licensing of any nuclear power plant a It include a "The plans submitted must

licensee, Analysis Report" must be submitted.

in section IV for the emergency planning description of elements set outto demonstrate that plans providc reasonable zones, to an extent sufficient h

assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be ta!.en in t e event of an emergency."

We submit to you that an incomplete plan as Mr. Eckert referred to is ls, and units II and III will be in L

also inadequate, and therefore unit direct violation of N.R.C. code should they be licensed.

Another apparent violation to the N.R.C. code was revealed during the in response to questioning by Supervisor course of James Hunts testimony,is the head of the Of fice for Disaster Preparedness).

it would be approximately one hour before a team could be Hedgecock.

(Hunt ld be Hunt stated that assembled and decisions on action, such as public notification, couemergency respon This is also stated in Nuclear power plant taken.

on page VIII-2 (Dec. 1980).

. The design objective "By July 1, 1981,.

l notifica-The N.R.C. code states, shall be to have the capabilley to essentially complete the initf a hin about 15 tion to the public within the Plume exposure pathway EPZ witO hve minutes."

up to this standard.

8111060556 811015 58' PDR ADOCK 05000361 9:

PDR H

n e I

o k

Page '2 We call on you to carry out your civic duty to enforce the law by revoking the license of Saa Onof re unit I and to deny licensing to units II and III.

For further.information about the inadequacies of the 0.D.P. plan please feel free to contact us.

Sincerely,

~.

Ajkl /

y1& &

Robert Holzman ge 7rcyfSmith Znclosure l' 5 $ d a $bJf 'i / O*P3

$ A o k c.,,15 %,. b t ] N ' e n,

~ 21, c J.L. s e.. ~,,(s u.s t

l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _