ML20031F661

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
QA Program Insp Rept 99900330/81-01 on 810804-07. Noncompliance Noted:Drawing Control Not in Compliance W/Qa Manual & Sampling Insp Procedures Did Not Define Insp Level Necessary for Acceptance of Matl Lots
ML20031F661
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/14/1981
From: Mcneill W, Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20031F646 List:
References
REF-QA-99900330 NUDOCS 8110200274
Download: ML20031F661 (6)


Text

.

ORGANIZATION:

BESTINGHOUSE ELECTRlC CORPOR4T10N, SBETCHGEAR DIH S10N, EAST PITTSBURGH, PEiiNSYLVAN'.x REPORT NO.: 99900330/81-01 INSPECTION DATE(S): 8/4-7/81 INSPECTION ON-SITE HOURS: 26 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:

Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Switchgear Division ATTN:

Mr. D. M. Sauter General Manager 700 Braddock Ave.

East Pittsburgh, PA 15112 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:

Mr. H. I. Stahr, QA Manager TELEPHONE:

(412) 256-2329 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Switchgear assemblies NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY:

I.ess than one percent of Westinghouse switchgear assemblies are nuclear.

Presently, there are four open orders for about 200 assemblies most of which are Class 1E.

>\\N.

\\<)

.I

(#-

h ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:

W. M. McNeill, Cmhponents Section (CS)

' 0#te l OTHER INSPECTOR (S):

h a

N dd%[

/

)

APPROVED BY:

U. Potapovs, Chief, Vendor Inspection Brancn Date g

INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:

BASES:

10 CFR Part 21 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.

SCOPE:

Change control, manufacturing process control, nonconformances and corrective action, Part 21 inspection, and status of previous inspection findings.

DESIGN *ED ORIGINAL Certifie.1 Byl d1OM iW 8110200274 810916

99 Og}$9 ENVWE

ORGANIZAf10N: WESTA."GHDUSE ELECTRIC COD.PORAT10N, SUITCHGEAR DIVZSION EASTPTTISBURGH,PENNSYLVAtlIA REPORT NO.: 99900330/81-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:

PAGE

,2 of 3 A.

VIOLATIONS:

None B.

NONCONFORMANCES:

1.

Contrary to the QA Manual, Section 1.2.1 and Criterion V of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, records were r'.;t maintained as required by applicable specific contract requirements such as QPS 386-2.

2.

Contrary to the QA Manual, Section 6.1 and Criterion V of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, drawings were not contrclied in that two out of date revisions were fr,und in the shop and a Master Orawing List was found to contain two entries with erroneous revision levels.

3.

Contrary to the QA Manual 7.2.2.1.b. and Criterion V of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, sampling inspection was not defined in procedures.

4.

Contrary to the QC Instructier. Number 10 and Criterion V of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, the sequence of calibration operations precluded the identification of some out-of-calibration tools.

D.

STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:

(0pe6 Jeviation (79-01):.The QA prograt, did not address the requirements for QA records.

Westinghouse Switchgear has written a procedure on QA records, QAP Number 4, but not formally issued this procedure.

Westinghouse has implemented a dual record system, in general.

Some records, such as IEEE qualification data, are stored as a single record in fireproof vaults.

In review of this procedure Nonconfonnance 1 was noted.

E.

OTHER FItOINGS OR COMMENTS:

1.

Change control - Two contracts were reviewed including changes to these contracts.

The contracts were with a utility and an NSSS su;iplier.

Changes were reviewed by the original design personnel.

l Two significant changes were traced including documentation of the review, approval, and implementation.

2.

Manufacturing precess control - One shop order for nuclear work was found,n the shop f&rication area.

The manufacturing information package-for shop order 29Y2074_was inspected including referenced drawings.

Check lists.were found to be in use to document inspection acti vi ties. Norconformances 2 and 4 were identified in this area.

ORGANIZATION:

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATIONo SWITCHGEAR DIVISION EAST PTTTSBURGH, PENNSYLVPNIA REPORT NO.:

99900330/81-01 i,JSPECTION RESULTS:

PAGE 3 of 3 3.

Nonconformances ind corrective action - One subsection, sa.all part machining, was inspected for implementation of the control of non-conformances.

The use of red " Hold" tags and "DA" tags was verified.

The corrective action system was verified.

Nonconfermance 3 was identified in this area.

4.

10 CFR Part 21 inspection - The posting of Part 21 and implementation

. of procedure NQD-239 was verified.

Only one recent problem has been reviewed as a potential Part 21 item.

~

P

}

G W-l

'S, e.

I T

4mA

  • A

.g r

%\\

w b

l

PERSONS CONTACTED d]&b Th

b. 5 - 1. / 9 81 oates Company Docket / Report No.

99fdDE30/8/~d/

Inspector Page I of L NAME(Please Print)

TITI.E(Please Print)

ORGANIZATION (Please Print) 5 iVl H. E, 5 0 M OA / stu l(63 sc.wnsca 'Du l

l; wl k & Pn 7F s?so u me& M McueI

~

MD 4 - /9&5dL l tho Eh M52 l

l:

l!

lT TA f//UL e 9 l

@ l&%

I

~

l; l). h. bl%p(Led I f4 Sd l

n I/6 iseo I 2erdare E46 I

I!

y l!

lTG (LW l Arza % gs I

u I

I n Headeu I % < w e ce>l ly a coas I

rose.

I l$ W BLA fc2 I

OG &pcGL.

I n

l-T I 80LTod l

IM 59 I

l 1

I A e MAuwJ coe%

l 1

I R.a. 'sk&I exrw % I IV6, MAux lNEite&&/si^

l@ LRA l

elm, u. mrmtI sea. m.

Ica s,> m y e l

l l

l l

/

l l

l l

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

l I

I~

I I

I

  • l ELJLR ESA I bcKe i

I I

I I

J l

l I

I

I

)

d e

g r

l e

b 3

,c b

a

@i m

c u

i c

?g N

l M._

6 ttp 2-o O c

mnnp 7

E d

D eeea Ioo 4

t mm I uuf HN d

ccI tt l oo(

er ADD

?

ko 5

9 b

i n

7 O

1

/

X %

h tffo cp I

oe 9

nooi DR s

E 8

7 L

1 e

s 1

/ "

3

ueei

~

Z 5

L;r

/

sqptv C

s neyae 3

w C

f mSTDR

/

2M xf N u t.

4

/

u l

7 o

C1234 s

K I(

!c 1/ t R

p d

T.-

G c T

!c a

'rk U

s

/

V P v a

- H I

c o

T

)r &

r 5

D o 's

/

r e

r r

L X

a e

s r

>/ T A

/w

&u e a r

G >r

& w o

d u s e s

t G

2 & Y 2

v n f D

e O

i P

c L

o

?

71 3

V=/

A 0

t o

m 1

/

s A.

7 c

?

7 F u i

e f

r 1/

l E

U ' &lb D

/

d A

W e-a

/

/

c E

/

N TC i

c I

r l

2 C

M E E s

c e

A J

W A

7E %}

r X

B 2 E 7

t n

2

/

t l

/

S v

s i

,9 a

V 1 S

/

T E

u G o

p i

t

/

l t

f

%E U

/

5

)

.s E

T

r. C s r N

L i

y A

r 2 s e M

0 6 a

r P

a e

M I

r m T

L s$

i I

f c

/r ~7 o

s t

/

/

Y C

k s

/

/

/ L O

f a

7 d

n w 34 t

e D

5 $ d i

i c

O a e r

1 t

F e

r T

)f v s W M, n

2 w Q s f 's W R s d

e f

f R

C Re o

f i

Er w

e

&=]7 5

o W hly G o 5 A

_7 / MT 8 5 6

4

?

t 1

y 5

(

s ro f

/

e o

D D

& A.

t d 2

P

/

em i

2h de c

E /

f 2

W n D"

s 0 %

r O

4 rM e

3 f

A /

/

f ) D 9 e a V e &

O p

c E 6

l S

A 6 Z s k,S N2 O

c sa

(

s r 6 E anr E 1 t

/

(

n r A 1 l

A hrer l

a 2 A'T k Q cete h ? /

t t e t

/ /

0 A t

t c

rtth

)A P P 7

', 7 o s 5 S A C

unet G r v

PILO t

d eT 7~

4 o/

)

A 4

,/

P e E S

/

k' A T A

(

t W

% E 5 J G g

) Uf'i E S ll 5678 A

h R A A

F 0A E

l t

/

I no V

i s

t e

ael 4 S p

cra 2

3 2, 2 2

2

[

y gi u u 2 2 Tnfd n b

g iiea t wccM naeo erprA e

t mDSPQ 9

7 M

s n

2~

u l

6BS W n Ml u

/*

i c

is V

7 1-r d

o...

r.

o o

M W K

l'l D1234 C P o

e t

M

~

ZF o

/

c

/

1

/

Te S 1

h e

e M

D(

f V ?(

f I

p p

D 3

s o

/

n c

I S

~

i

)

e O

a r

l

]

.E /

e b

o~

b' a

2-m c

u i

/ y/

l l

f 7

ttp O o.

M mnnp f

4 eeea o

t mm l l f f uuf I

ccI tt1 ADD er l oo(

k o b )]

i n

cp tf f o S

oee DR g g

aooi d

s 5

1 ueei P

c J

sqpt v fpR

/

neyae 3

mSTDR u

l 1

o V

C12J4 W7 2

/9 S

W a_i 7

S

=

z

[f Mg

~

1 f

Tr T

e 0

Fso l6

d. ?

/

3 C<L t/

9 GE 2

D

{

2 h

M E

T s

lr u

I C

M E

F 0 c

A J

d 2

t X

B E

E U

1 S

/

/

D R S

T E

d M

N L

)

E T

As y

I r

M U

T u

A a

E s

l C

A s

T O

c *s e

D

?7 s ce dd n

t c Z

i2 f

Au i

{

~

Wh y

L EP ro f

d D

em i

iRr de cpk 1

&ce rf e

u O

o/ 7 S

l 2

l sa

(

c anr a

B 'c hrer

~

r n

d cet e p Y

U f)

M rtth&.

unet f-r PILO O. b W O

mO' k

5678 9

/

N n

o i

s t

e ael p

cra

?

3 Tnfdn y gi u u 2

cM ii ea t wccM naeo e

erprA mDSPQ l

15 u

u c

r d

2 o

o o

t M

h D1234 1

c

/

1 e

e 5

p p

s o

1 n

c r

>