ML20031E496

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards ASLB 811006 Order Closing Record Except for Three Issues Re Fema.Fema Response Should Discuss ASLB First Session Questions,Fema Position Re Medical Svcs for General Public & FEMA Findings on Jaske 810714 Memo to B Grimes
ML20031E496
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 10/09/1981
From: Hoefling R
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Perry S
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Shared Package
ML20031E497 List:
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8110160012
Download: ML20031E496 (1)


Text

-. - _ _.

't, K

53 gy

(

~

I s

"~

Dist 7:

00T15198fm y i

Docket Fiels "Eme.N @

6A 4

October 9,1981 g%)

Shapar/Engelhardt e

f

(

st bury /Scinto

,\\'

Spence W. Perry, Esq.

Rutberg Acting Assistant General Counsel Vogler Federal Emergency Management Agenc'y' Chandler 500 C Street, SW Hoefling Washington, DC 20472 Hassell Chron FF(2)

In the Matter of Wright Southern California Edison Company, et al.

Chan (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3) Miraglia Docket Nos. 50-361 OL, 50-362 OL Rood

Dear Mr. Perry:

I wish to express my appreciation for your efforts during the recent hearing held in this mattet in Anaheim,' Ca'lifornia'. The Board closed the record in this proceeding on September 30, 1981, subject to inclusion of three items, all of which relate to 'th'e Federal Emergency Management Agency. The record has been le.ft open to include a response from your agency to the questions posed by the Board during the 'first hearing session, FEMA's position with respei.t to medical service's 'for'.the ~ general public, and the FEMA findings and determinations referred to in the 'Jaske Memocandum of July 14,1981 to

~

Brian Grimes, which were then a'nticip'ited as 'of November 1,1981, t

The Board has issued an order shortly setting forth the remaining items to be incorporated into the record.'

A'. copy 1s enclosed. One point which will require explicit consideratiod'in 'sny subsequent TEMA findings deals with the currenttstate of confusion 'over the exact size of the plume exposure

~

pathway emergency planning zone. The'~ record should be clarified in this regard.

It would be most helpful ~1f'this subject area were explicitly addressed

~

in the FEMA findings document t,d b'e issued and hopefully resolved to FEMA's satisfaction.

Once again thank you for your assistance. If you have any q4estions, please donothesitatetocontactme.';~

Sincerely, Richard K. Hoefling Counsel for NRC Staff cc:

Kenneth Nauman, Jr.

6 Plans and Preparedness Divisifon b

I gdenalEmergencyManagementAg'en'cy

,/

""c 4

.h.h.c,fsho,)CA.,,,9,0.0.5..,,,,,,.,,. 0 jfg\\,,,

D sun u H

1,

mr P3 Ulbdstedd 8ttot 12 81 10'/* * ' ' ' ' 8' '1' ' " 1'0"/ f' '.'./ 81' * * * ' ""

y..... '.'. '.................

0'*/** /8'1'

  • u poR A K 050

. 7...

--. IC I A L R E CD R D CO PY. -... -. -

4 - w-32n24 O F F. -. -- - - - -.. _,.

NRC FORM 3IB l10e80l NRCM O240

-