ML20031E302

Forwards Revised Pages to Environ Rept Containing Requested Info.Info Will Be Included in Next Environ Rept Revision

ML20031E302
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	10/12/1981
From:	Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
KMLNRC-81-123, NUDOCS 8110150351
Download: ML20031E302 (36)

Text

_

l KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE ELECTAC COMPANY GLENN L MOESTER v>CE pets ot%T %vcogast October 12, 1981 tn 6

fD

{(

T

~

[q Harold R. Denton, Director 1.

Office Of riuclear Peactor Regulation g

Nuclear Regulatory Commission aj OCT151981* [8 Washington, D.C.

20sss Uh8445^8 N " 'I XMLNRC 81-123

1. 58" U/

\\

RE: Docket No. STN 50-482 Ilb

Dear Mr. Denton:

In discussions w.ith Dr. Gordon Edison, NRC Project Manager for Wolf Creek, it was learned that the NRC Staff required additional information and revisions to material presented in the Wolf Creek Environmental Report (ER) in order to complete the review of the ER.

Attached are revised pages of the ER which contain the requested information. This information will be included in the next ER revision.

Very truly yours, l5 $

GLK:gm cc:

Dr. Gordon Edison (2)

Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Mr. Thomas Vandel Resident NRC Inspector Box 311 Burlington, Kansas 66839 00Y si :

8110150351 811012 PDR ADOCK 05000402 C

PDR 201 N. Market - Wictuta, Kansas - Mail Address: PO. Box 208 I Wichita, K1nsas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) !61-6451

~

7 A Ol t

T

===:

==:

~

i s

% N

• s

's CIRCULATING WATER

'N s DISCHARGE r

io

[000

'O LIJ Lc2

!O j

Q r

0 8

8 h

Z '.> -

c_

.. -q a.

10 of o

c a

o g

5 i

I

'o O t i

{

l h

l

~~

S l

i

}

t I

re kllls (_oj l

P l

I oO l

1 l

i j,

{

O i

h l.

I y

i><

l t,,

l s

J

{

G45EoJS Rite 45t Peaovs hI O odrr VE9r (EL. 22 t.d)

@ N fs kbc. Veur (f c. icK s')

@ Tvntsuus m.sc. vem, cst.,,u.e y a n eu e uns. n, w sr n a l

a MW je magt vser b dVYiLIARY $ctfA SfkAs (fl. M 40')

b.3

@ EMEAGENt'/ besto Ex#Ausr (Et. *M1.s')

WO LF CR EEK GEN ER ATING STATION UNIT NO. I ENVIROfJMENTAL REPORTJ$ ERATINGUCENSE STAGE)

@ - LIQUID RELEASE POINT FIGGRE 3.1 - 3 i

GASEcuS ANO LIQUID RELCASE POINTS

^*

WCGS-Ed(OLS) 3.4 HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM 3.4.1 GENERAL The Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit No. 1, (WCGS) cooling system is designed to support two 1150-MWeLpressurized water reactors (PWR) operating at a 100 percent' average annual load factor for normal conditions.

At this rate, a maximum g

of 8.0 X 10 Btu of heat per hour per unit will be dissipated in the cooling lake.

The heat will be dissipated through evaporation, convection, and radiation for the systems shown on Figure 3.4-1.

3.4.2 COOLING LAKE The station cooling lake is formed by one main earth-rolled dam across Wolf Creek and five perime er saddle dams.

The cooling lake, peripheral dams, dikes, internal canals, and outlet works are shown on Figure 2.1-5.

Plans of the service spillway and the outlet works are shown on Fi e.as t

3.4-2 and 3.4-3.

The top of the main dam is at elevation 1100 feet above mean sea level (MSL).

Each dam has a 3 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope on both the upstream and downstream faces.

The upstream slope of each dam is riprapped for protection against wind-generated wave erosion while the downstream slope is seeded.

The top of the main dam is riprapped to prevent erosion.

A service spillway and an auxiliary spillway on the east abutment of the main dam are designed to accomodate the probable maximum flood.

The service spillway is an uncon-trolled, concrete, ogee-crested semicircular spillway.

The auxiliary spillway is located about 1500 feet east of the service spillway and is an open-cut type.

A low-level outlet works is located near the west abutment of the main dam.

The outlet works is provided with a 60-inch diameter outlet pipe.

A 30-inch diameter blowdown pipe branches from the outlet pipe.

The blowdown pipe is l

provided with an 18-inch free discharge (Howell-Bunger) valve which has a maximum blowdown discharge capacity of approxi-L mately 90 cfs at lake normal' operating level of 1087.0 feet MSL.

This blowdown system (30-inch diameter pipe and its associated 18-inch valve) isLdesigned to blowdown water to regulate the water quality of the cooling lake.

For the i

cooling lake design purposes, a maxir.um blowdown of 40 cfs l

was used to analyze the chemistry of the lake.

The 60-inch diameter pipe which is provided with a 60-inch diameter free discharge valve will be used when necessary to drain the l-cooling lake to permit inspection and repairs of the main l-dam.

l l

Rev. 3 3.4-1

/81 L

WCGS-ER(OLS) 3.6 CHEMICAL AND BIOCIDE Wh3TFS 3.6.1 GENERAL The primary source of makeup water for the cooling lake at the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit No. 1 (WCGS) is the discharge from the John Redmond Reservoir, which supplies water for the initial filling of the cooling lake, cooling lake makeup, steam cycle makeup, and the sanitary and potable water systems.

Rainfall and runoff from Wolf Creek serve

~

as additional sources of water to the cooling lake.

Makeup for the cooling lake is pumped from the Neosho River immediately downstream from the John Redmond dam.

The typical water quality of the John Redmond Reservoir at the dam and the expected water quality of the cooling lake are shown in Table 3.6-1.

Plant discharges during operation to the cooling lake consist l of condenser circulating wate_, including service water dis-charge, and effluents froo.he radwaste treatment system, sewage treatment syster oil separator (see Figure 3.3-1). l The cooling lake blowdow1 is discharged into the Neosho River via Wolf Creek.

The foli, wing sections discuss the chemicals added to various plant sy stems (see Tables 3.6-2 and 3.6-3),

the water chemistry during normal plant operation, the wastes l

produced by using these chemicals, and the effect of these chemicals on the cooling lake composition.

To predict the effects of plant operations, on the total dissolved aolids (TDS) concentrations in the cooling lake, Sargent & Lundy's LAKET computer model was used assuming the weather conditions for the years 1949-1964.

One-and two-unit operation at 100 and 88.5 percent average annual load factors, respectively, was simulated.

The LAKET com-puter model simulates the ef fects of the varying known weather conditions and the plant's expected heated-water discharge on the surface temperature and evaporation rates of the lake.

The TDS concentrations in the lake (not account-

~

ing for acid feed) can be predicted for any time using the computer model with the inp:.t of the expected makeup and 4

blowdown rates.

The ef fects of acid feed on the TDS con-centrations in the lake are discussed in Section 3.6.2.2.

Tables 3.6-4 and 3.6-5 show the predicted monthly average TDS values for one-and two-unit operation, respectively.

A detailed description of the cooling lake operation is pre-sented in Section 3.3.6.

The 16 years consist of three periods:

pre-drought period from 1949-1952, the drought period from 1952-1957, and the post-drought period from 1957-1964.

This historic drought period is calculated,to have a recurrence interval of 50 years.

The ability of the Wolf Creek Cooling Lake to cleanse itself after a drought period is exhibited by the TDS data in Table 3.6-5.

The cooling lake cleanses itself after design drought conditions Rev. 3 3.6-1

/81

=.

- _. ~

...~.

WCGS-ER(OLS) since for analysis _ the blowdown is increased from 0-' to 41 cfs after the drought and makeup water rate,'which would lower TDS concentrations,,is increased from 40 cfs to a max-3 imuin of 120'cfs.

d s

4 I

E i,

)

i -

I i

1 1

i f

i 9

(

4 i

i 9

Rev. 3 3.6-la

/81 I

i

1 TABLE 3A-2 PARAMETERS USED IN T!!E CALCULATION OE' ESTIMATED ACTIVITY IN LIQUID WASTES Collection & Decay Collector Tank Volume of Specific Period Assumed pocessedj With Sources Liquid Wastes Activity Basis gefore gj y

Comrents n -

A.

Reactor coolant drain 300 gal / day 1.0 PCA(1) 0.05 gpm/R.C. pump 142 Ewt-10 percent assumed tank seal leak and other Eced C,, d discharged. Balance

'e miscellaneous leakage recycled to BRS.

B.

Letdown shim bleed 1,840 gal / day 1.0 PCA(1)

CVCS inventory control None-

'10 percent assumed rec / $84u/

discharged. Balance.

recycled to BRS.

C.

Waste holdup tank 400 gal / day 0.5 PCA(1)

W Recycled to RMWST l

/0 daEs 1.

Equipment drains Tank drains, fil ter drains, heat exchanger drains, demineralizer drains y

O 2.

Excess samples Miscellaneous pre-cn purges sample 1

0.056 rn D.

Floor drain tank 1,It? gal / day age-PCA(1)

Nemr-Recycled to RMWST or l [

~74 discharged o

1.

Decontamination Puel cask, vessel head Nominal discharge' 3

water system component flushing, will be 5,000 gallons floor washdown, etc.

at 35 gpm, approx 1-mately twice a week.

Annual release is given in FSAR Table 11.1-2.

2.

Laborator?

Washing and rinsing of equipment laboratory equipment.

Reactor grade drains which are aerated.

Maintenance drains for filters, II. Ex., demin-eralizers, etc.

E.

Chemical drain tanks 7,000 gal /yr Samples plus sample 90 '1ys Drummed rince water Rev. K

. [/81~

TABLE 3A-2 (Sheet 2)

Collection & Decay Period Assumed T'rocc5s 67 Collector Tank Volume of Specific with Sources Liquid wastes Activity Basis Before Dir? '"J Q ccaments NUPIG-0017 h

Recycled within.

(

F.

Laundry and hot 450 gal / day 7o/qI3 closed laundry sys-shower tank tem or discharged.

Nominal discharge will be 5,000 gal-lons at 35 gpm, approximately twice per month. Annual release is given in FSAR Table 11.1-2.

G.

Steam generator 86,400-1.0 SCA (2)

Continuous blowdown None Normally recycled to 518,400 gal /

of 60-360 gpm condensate /feedwater system day H.

Secondary liquid 7,200 gal / day (3)

Floor drains None Discharged or re-waste drain and equipment cycled to con-

E:

drains densate storage O

collector tank tank. Annual release is given s

in FSAR Table M

11.1-2.

W n

O I.

Condensate deminer-4,286 gal / day (3) 15,000 gal /high None Processing options r

j CD are:

alizer regeneration TDS regeneration 1.

Neutralize and waste waste - per regeneration discharge 2.

Process and recycle to con-denser 3.

Evaporate and discharge 12,857 gal / day (3) 45,000 gal / low Recycled to second-TDS regeneration ary cycle or dis-charge waste - per regeneration (1)

PCA - Primary coolant specific activit/

(2)

SCA - Secondary coolant speci fic activ; ' y (3)

Fraction of SCA internally calculated by CALE Code.

3 Rev. K

//81 7

f

TABLE 3A-5 GALE CODE INPUT DATA SNUPPS Nuclear Unit PWR Parameters Value Thermal power level (megawatts) 3565.000 Plant capacity factor 0.000 Mass of primary coolant ( thousands lbs) 530.000 Percent fuel with cladding defects 0.120 Primary system letdown rate (qpm) 75.000 Letdown cation demineralizer flow (gpm) 7.500 4.000 Number of steam generators Total steam flow (millions Ibs/hr) 15.850 Mass of steam in each steam generator (thousands Ibs) 8.000 Mass of liquid in each steam generator (thousands lbs) 104.000 Mass of water in steam generatorr (thousands lbs) 416.000 Total mass of secondary coolant (thousands lbs) 3570.0n0 Steam generator blowdown rate (thousands lbs/hr) 176.000 Primary to secondary leak rate (lbs/ day) 100.000 Condensate demineralizer regeneration time (days) 17.500 EO Fission product carry-over fraction 0.001 O'

Halogen carry-over fraction 0.010 Condensate demineralizer flow fractior 0.684 Radwaste dilution flow (thousands gpm; 5.000 M

W n

O t*

to Liquid Waste Inputs Collection Decay Flow Rate Fraction Fraction Time Time Decontamination Faptors Steam (gal / day 1 of PCA Discharged (days)

(days)

I CS Others

7. COE +O 4 s

Shim bleed rate 1.84E+03 1.000

.1 70.}OTV-

2. 0 a.e 1.00E+0*

. 0 J J U3 1.00E+ 05 rquipment crains 3.00E+02 1.000

.1 EOM9-tT 2.D M 1.00E+0 +

2.00E+0J4 1.00E*0/ 5 Ecan waste input C 00E+02

.500

.1

/o.0 Emtr

,lg5 h4P 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+05 t

Dirty waste input 1.14E+03

.058 1.0 7OOTC~

37o Gh{"

1.00E*04 1.00E+05 1.00E+05 S.G. blowdown

.s.80E+05 (1)

.0

.0

.000 1.00E+03 1.00E+02 1.00F+03 Untreated blowduwn 27E+05 (1) 1.0 0.0

.000 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 Regenerant solutions 4.71E+04 (1)

.o

.0

. 350 G,4H 1.33f+02 2.67E+02 1.33E+02 (1) Fraction of SCA internally calculated by GALE Code Gaseous Waste Inputs There is continuous low vol. purge of vol. control tk Holdur time f,r xenon (days) 9.0E+1 9.0E+1 Holdup time for krypton (days).

i l

Fill time of decay tanks for the gcs stripper (days) 0.0E+0 Dev. Tg g-4

/81-(

.s

-m

r

+

1WMimrd!IUaF1 1

N I

9 DjIQat tig}jd)'M alg

&9

[

• Z"' s AttYttI es is,,,,

i g_ _ _..

,.ec e.c.t.s.

t.s. ar.g es t aggette 4,

.um rrm......

-=

III

-' Fit 9 FILf tR g

age q

q t

..:,..c...,

i tealg 7a=4 4R:371 n

aw a%se 9

l_

e.a W,

}

4 w l-a W

+. -

easit m

I na s.se

{

ecat

• tat tac =ansta

' a== e m

,g.

I I

sosit F

tvapoeaf t

[8,,*"'yi vasti E varansf 0A p..'. _"

i

=

Lj

""L'"

f

",,y, i

• j i

h t

l Tf DTiaWT'[TiiY a s UTMal t

i f LG3

• • y"*

( j IS414 T &44 q mf 986 a;.

(h

(##

~

5 1

n.a. c.ai.

,u.. e.a z.

I4 44 3 ' A A !4( 9 Ia 44 f lL I[R 8

e i

^ - [ 5 alDP~mle R y[

[*******~'**

a w

[

k F, i I

i h

e

-e E

f L as=04 T A uG w 3T $wC Wi t it & m3i taas et Gw% M I

.e 41 a

I (e)

(aj og yg s *g i

es.

.s L 8.M5 L & MS I84 }f 9418eE5 T a gs FILif t s

x ~:asunaunst M u ~,.

l ms l

==.

4 m i"!"l.W""

V l

.a 1, i.u,,.

as Dnbl%

0t.1 E C f '.t s..,-

4 m,

s...a.

f CT4AM G Ffl0 Ft'f 4 I

f 1 s

n" ".. :..,n. !

t.

L j m...

3 n.n... n,

(.y _...

j

g,...,

s.

i g.,=

n-.

.1 L

9,

. A.a.x.~

.8m

a mism.u car

'wt

.a v. rat..

. :',,5 %.

t Wl lv a}fj=

t 4

,I V

' (9

.,...,..1....

t..n, u...

.1n

... : 2c..L S Y $ ' EN 't &g

$T3f f e 6669

}

o

r.,

t

$?f ou GE NF A&TG G

'T l

,9 g j-----------,

i O

,l I i u_,3,,,s.

48 A* f 00 x

_u I

Wi t i t

/

8 j

7 l

6 l

g I

y

l

/

,i 8

. mu...

g er:

.,.-., m. c

.,<,m, g.

w,

• c.==. ::.

=-

,. m....., l f l

• t.3..

. ~....

C.49 t =

'E, g

.m,.....,......

c...

s B,- +,u...

r, '

.< u, a..... i,...C

...g

.1 u

1.. - u.....u.,3,

n 1

~'

2 :.rS.:..

~

'Ay; e

1..

L ;

g si.'

t c.,

a " s.

.c, n.,

y" '.=

.j

~.

,g 7

c v,.

u..,,.

w j

F IL,E s l

y

.f Dd e : My i

e r

---

2-~

O t.

I Add I

.E.,,.., t.. :,1. c.

m-..

e.s.s.

.. s., e.. i. :.

4~.

r ' ~

g, J

j j,

t j

t,- ----------J Y

---t 4

7..,E

..o. 3, l

l I #)

[

.. s.,. m,.

1.

5 ',3 t.

~~., m. m 5.(1 D85a

.3 l --------------,

G"H,

l ;

~~ a W

3,..o...

A.

CJ I

T c,

7

t. s i

I l

.-------+ ---.--

b l

. ; s.,m.

2

~

s.

s1

_a

.,.>..e, l

Q 3

-, 1 +-_t w

s -...s.1.<

,m.:.u..j F 1 s

l an nv,".,..

e

(.el o

t. A... - _. - -

m P;ys g --

s r3 r_,

LJ VJ i W...i"'

Rev. 3 feL B

7 WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION N

/

UNIT NO.1 L' _{=u ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT (OPERATING LICENSE STAGU t.

-.r:m

. Au;AA >. AM g _ _ _,

r-4 l

.q:#" -----+rn~"

URE 3A-1 LlOUlD WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS BLOCK DIAGRAM N

s 5

1 4

{

j 2

l 1

i

Plant Discharge R. C. Dr Tank Vent to Juh Via Liquid Radwaste m

(300 gpd O 1.0 PCA) n Gaseous Radwaste System (Equipment Drains) 3 3

Reactor Makeup Letdoven 1

"""""=

2 3

4 5

6

- 7 Water Tank I

(1.840 gpd - shim bleed)A (2,140 gpd) 8 i____________i DECONTAMINATION FACTORS Cesium &

Other Iodine Rubidium Nuclides 1.

Recyc ' Evaporator Domineralizer (a) 10 2

10 2.

Recycle L 'porator Feed Filter 1

1 1

3.

Recycle Holdup Tank 4

Recycle Evaporator 102 193 103 d) 5.

Recycle Evaporator Condensate Demineralizer V) yoT g to y /0 6.

Recycle Evaporator Condensate Fi'ter 1

1 1

System DF 10T 2-x-103

,10 '

4 Y

/D Zy/c s'O Decq Note Boron Recycle System R* T - [ 3 Gere n S'ecycle h'*Wup Lk d,[el! rela *ca, 7,% e.

f S.

2 Tc e 0.0 x m mo WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION

= <'o. ? d.,Y '

2, /vo UNIT NO.1

• 3'

' re-ENvlRONMENTAL REPORT (OPERATING LICENSE STAGE) e Mixed Bed h " #'

2 d4y s

=

^ m c,n DeJ-2 /, W Figure 3A-2 2'

(Sheet 2)

System Decontamination Factors i

g pak Plant Discharge i

I I

Reactor Makeup Clean 4

5 6

?

Water Tank Wastes W

1 2

3 (400 god)

(400 gpd @ 0.5 PCA)

DECONTAMINATION FACTORS l

Cesium &

Other

(

1 l

Iodine Rubidium Nuclides 1.

Waste Holdup Tank 2.

Waste Evaporator Feed Filter 1

1 1

3.

Waste Evapotator 103 104 104 4.

Liquid Waste Charcoal Adsciber 1

1 1

l l

S.

Waste Evaporator Condensate Demineralizer 10 10 10 6.

Waste Evarirator Condensate Filter 1

1 1

System DF 104 105 105 beca 1 Ti"t e-k1 s/c Doces5 3

Wade. llclhy> DkN 4

C o ffe c 4 7 h e_

L e_.

Liquid Radwaste Fc v. K Train **A" - Clean Waste N/ L ',

g= O+VMCoo=.o./ssd,y WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION 4

K = O 4 x "',"' - fo/.,y s 4 4'#

UNIT NO.1 d o ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT IOPERATING LICENSE STAGE)

Figure 3A 2 (Sheet 3)

System Decontamination Factors

I 3

4 Discharge Dirty Waste (1,140 gpd 1

2 5

6 7

8 y Reactor Makeup

@ 0.058 PCA)

Water System DECONTAMINATION FACTORS C assu m &

Other lodine R ubidiurn hgInfm 1.

Floor Drain Tank 2.

Floor Drain Tank Filter 1

1 1

3.

Waste Monitor Tank Demineralizer (a) 4.

Waste Monitor Tank Filter (a) i j

j 5.

Waste Evaporator (b) 103 104 104 6.

Liquid Waste Charcoal Adsorber 1

1 1

7.

Waste Evaporator Condensate Demineralizer 10 10 10 8.

Waste Evaporator Condensate Filter 1

1 1

I System DF c) 104 105 105 Dec44 T* G.

Liquid Radwaste Rt' V,/

F/co, Des /,. LE k Ws Ic llocessiaj 7I' c Train B"- Dirty Waste

/' 81 dol /cci-en 77* c_

WOlJ CREEK GENERATING STATION T = o " '6 "A = 0 3'!o 'I'y UNIT NO.1 q = o. a x to,wo,, 7s 7

Ys j f 9g 2/;4 "

ENVIRONMENTAL HEPORT (OPERATING LICEP SE STAGE) a) Used only when influent activity <10-5,u ci/cc Figure 3A-2 b) Used when influent activity 210-5pCi/cc (Sheet 4) c) Assumes evaporator path System Decontamination Factors

'.}~

3 s

}

)

(

)

(

i )

)

Recycle Laundry & Hot Showers 1

2 3

4 5

Plant Discharge (450 gpd) l (Built into the GALE code)

DECONTAMINATION FACTORS Cesium &

Other lodine Rubidium Nuclides 1.

Laundry and Hot Shower Tank 2.

Laundry and Hot Shower Filter 1

1 1

3.

Laundry and Hot Shower Reveise Osmosis 10 10 10 4.

Laundry and Hot Shower Charcoal Adsorber 1

1 1

5.

Laundry and Hot Shower Storage Tank System DF 10 10 10 De raq T%

)

Liquid Radweste -

ReV- /--

b S

""k Laundry Train fl81 Cotha:w Tw WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT NO.1 Tc C+^'oooo =- a 9 g,

3 0 I X 'O ""

= a 7 c4y ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT (OPERATING LICENSE STAGE)

Y 5;760 4so Figure 3A-2

-Y-rh e GALE code efoes ref use flese d"ay cred; f-C c. tors,

System Decontamination Factors

wcGs-u tois) s TABLE 5.2-3 CALCUI,ATl:0 LIQUID IT FLU f NT DISC!lAHGE CONCt.NTRATICi4S FROM ROUTINE OPERATION pC2/1 Release Circulaging Cooligg d

Isotope Ci/yr Water Lake LeRoy

- -. ~. -

lH 3

4.10 +002 2.38+004 2 34*004 7.3 9 E + oo2 d4cp 51

% 00 005-r W:UD F T 632005 2.41 E -006~

25MN 54 1.20-004 1 22-003 1.11-003 2bfE^ 55 9.00-005 2 3a-003 '

~~2.~3 0-0 03 3.50 E -c oS

1. 26 E '-o o5 2bFC Sa 5.00-005 17-004 7.02-005 2.AQ'E-oo6

~27C0~ 56 1.30-003 u~.09-003-2 8 S-003 '~

9, o 9 E - o o5 27c3

'o D 9.30-004 4.07-002 3.as-002 1.26 E -oo3 35BR 7 ?

.1.00 005-2T7"UUh 9740-T06 2.91 E 009'

t. 2 r,0 9a

1. e 0 -0 0 3 1.84-003 1.67-004

-~437c 9 M 1.70-003

^1.bO-003 -

1. 3 3-005 - ~~ 5. 27 E - oos q, ao E - 00 ~8 52TE 129M 7.00-005 1.39-004 7.42-005

~ 2 33 E -oo6

~'53I-131

9. 5 0 -0C 2 1.12-001' 2.40-002-7, g 1 E - 004 52TE 132 b.10 -0 0 4 b.30-004 6.1"-005 1,J 5 5 - o o 6 5?I l32 I.70 0C3 T FETUU3-~~ ~52 1 UDb t. 6i~E - o o 7 53I 133 3.00-002 2 67-002 6.23-004 2.60 E -ooS 55c5 134 E.10 -0 0 3 1.79-001~-

1.71-001 ~~ 5.4o E -oo3 53I 135 5.20-003 4 69-003 4.55-005

1. 41 E - oo6 55cs'13b 2.10-003 2.61-003 ~~~

~6 ~. 5 u -0 0 4 ~ ' 2.7o E-co5 55cs 137 7.30-003 5.03-001 4.9b-001 1.51 E - oo2 40Z r 95 17 40 0D4-7GT4:004 T 3ur004 g.96 E-co6 41rm 95 2.00-004 4.06-004 2 20-004 6.94 E -oo6 3?ps Sb 2.00-005 3.03-C05 ~~ ~1.17-005 ~ ~ ~ ~3.' 69' E -col 44RU 103 2.00-005 4.35-005 2.49-005 7.86 E-oo?

'44RU loi

~ 2.40 -004 2.90-003 --

2.be-003

%. 46 E -005 47As 110M 4 00-005 3.4b-004 3.03-004 7J5 g oo6

~ ~ 5 S c t-14 4 5.20-004

~ 4796-U03-~

~4750 003 f.42 E -ooi 34SR 69

2. 00 -OC S 5.12-005 3.26-005 1.03 E -00 6 52TE 12?M

1. 00 -Or 5 4.32-005 ~

3.39-005 1.07 E- 006 52TE 127 2.00-005 1.86-005 2.46-007 7,16 E-009 52TC'12" 5.00-005 4.b5-005 7. 4 'i -0 0 P.

2.36 E-ooi 53I 130 1,.00-004 9.49-005 1.b3-00b g g g. cog

~~~52TE 131M-~3;002005- " 2 790 = 00 5 ~~~

~T. IF;U D b' ~~3, 12 E 7038 93NP 23" 2.00-005 2 01-005 1.47-006 4. 6t E.- oo&

i 0 N = fretastable bnased solely on dilution by the circulating water discharge anc buildup of radionuclides over 40 year plant life, c Based on dilution by the circulating water discharge and build-dp f radionuclides in the cooling lake over 40 year plant life.

u Concentration of radionuelides at the LeRoy water works intake.

Based on dilution by circulating water discharge and build-up pN. 3 of radionuclides in the cooling lake over 40 year plant life 4,

and additional dilution in the Neosho River.

/Cl

WCGS-CR(OLS)

TABLE 5.2-12

/PPENDIX I CONFORMANCE

SUMMARY

TisBLE FOR LIQUID AND GASEOUS CFFLUENTS Design Calculaged Point of Dose a

Type of Dose Objective Dose Evaluation Liquid Effluents b

Dose to total body 3 mrom/yr 2.5) mrem /yr Point of Discharge l

from all pathways per site Cooling Lake c

Dose to any organ 10 mrem /yr 3.63 mrem /yr Same as above f

from all pathways per site Gaseous Effluents Dose to total body 5 mrem /yr mrem /yr

.75 gi N of stack f

of an individual per site vent Dose to skin of an 15 mrom/yr mrem /yr

.75 mi N of stack l

individual per site vent Radiciodine and Particulates Dose to any organ 15 mrem /yr

-- mrem /yr" Residence, 1.4 mi.

I from all pathways per site N of stack vent.

Milk ccw 1.1 mi. N of stack.

I-131 releases 1 Ci/yr Ci/yr gaseous per unit LQ950 Ci/yr liquid Total C1/yr aAppendix I design objectives from Sections II.A, II.B II.C, and II.D (By Annex, RM50-2) of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50; considers doses to maximum individual.

bv~---*

Ma.vimum dose to an individual from all liquid pathways.

Maximum dose to a teen liver from all liquid pathways.

PN d

Maximally c xposed sector.

Dose to an infant thyroid.

fD,I e

'hlk.

62 -5 ESTIMATED COSE RATES TO 4AXIMUM

_' LOCATION IS LEP0Y ItiDIVID"ALS RESIDING IN illE TOWN A D UL T D0 S ES

_______EGC@Sa______32aa@0______aG0238.___.____ DOSE __(MREM PER YEAR I PATH AY SKIN BCNE L IV ER TOTAL BC'DY THYRO FISH b.b4-UUd 1 07 UD1 7.572C02

~

1. 8T G INVERTEBRATE 8 13-C04 1.b6-DD.

1.2l.-003 3.89-C 171b"CO3 5.83-002 5.'7E-002

~~~ ~~ ' 5.~7 5 - C D RI WIN G ~

e.11-C05 b.95-005 6."5-005 6.95-005 6."5-0 SHOPELINE

- ~ S iJ I U M ! N G-00 2 97-C07 2.a7-EC7 2.97-007 2.97-C BOATING

.00 9 90-007

" a0 -007 9.9C 907 9."G-C i071t e.11-EU5

6. 8v:CDI:

1.b7-GU.

1.35=UU1 5."9;C SELECTED LOCATION LOCATION IS LEROY T E EN A G E R D0 5E S

_______CSa33a______32&Esa______&Sa2&E_________ DOSE __(MREu PER YEAR IN DATW.AY SKIN 8CNE LIVER TOTAL 80DY THYR 0!

- 'I S H 7 04-UUc IITU-UU1 4.d E C2 170 TOC t

INVERTEBRATE e.61-C04 1.64-G03 7.66-004 3.06-CC

. _. _. _ _. _ _. ~ ~ - ~

33;CO3

~4.lb-002- ~~~~~ ~~T.~ 0 5 - 0 0 2 4.07-C0 540DELINE 4 53-0C4 3 56-C04 3.66-C04 3.66-004 1 55-00 Sd MMING~ ~ ~ ~

~

9C

--~ ~ ~~ ~ 1. 71 - C 0 6

'-~1. 71 -0 0 6 "~ ~ - ~1. 71 ~- 0 0 6 1.71-00 20ATINO

.00 S.90-C07 5

0-007 9.90 rG7 9."0-Gn

--TOTAL u. s.: - L U M

/.c d

U d 1 53-GUI 5 4b-UU2 4 30;U" SELECTED LOCATION LOCAT!ON IS LER0Y CH 1 L D D0 S E S

_______Escla9______acac&c______aC982S_________ DOSE __(MDE" PER YEAP INT F ATHW AY SPIN BONE LIVER TOTAL BODY THYPOI:

FISH

e. m-cue 1.7U-UUc 1.bi 00~2 1 34T003 INVERTESRATE 1 12-003 1.48-CO3 4.54-004 2.72-004

., y y g 7 N g _. - -

~ ~ - -

--~ ~ 3 2 6 - CO 3

- ~ 7. 9 9 - 0 0 i'~

7.b9-C02 7.eu-E02

_ - _ _ _ _. _. 9.46_005 6.10-005 e.10-005 E.10-005 a.10-005 SdORELINE

__gg

____ _ _.~~

1. 0 7 - C 0 b IT07-006 ------ 1. 0 7 -0 0 6 1 07-00d ESATING

.00 5.52-C07 5 52-007 5 52-C07

.52-G07

~T O TA L 1.4'-LUS 9.dW-UUc 1./c-LUA 1.4 M 03

~~ ~.~ C 12 0 0 2 e

SELECTED LOCATION LOCATION IS LEP0Y T'

D 0 S E S I N F A N

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ a a S 3 0 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ G 2 G S E @ _.. __ _ _ _ a G a a s R _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D O S E _ _ ( M R E M PER YEAR IN PATHWAY SKIN BONE LIVER TOTAL BODY THYROIC TT5R

.UU

.uu

.30

.00 J

00 INKING 3.37-203 7 93-002 7 53-002 7.e3-10e

. SHo?ELINE

.0U

.00

.00

.00 -

.00 r__ ---.-

sw

~~

0 I T A A E l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '. 0 0 0 0 0 _ _....

. a___________

'O KIDNEY GI-LLI fa 3.bb-Udd L.r-3 59-UU3 14 a.71-004 4.

9.27-004 12

~5 71-002-5; '-

5.6b-002 6 95-005

'5 6.95-005 6.

~

7 2. 9 7- 0 0 7 - -----~? ;

T-J ' '

2. 97;D07---

'7 9.90-007 9.

0-007 9.90-007 12 i.4<-uu?

77F-00e b.12-002

'hKE)__________ asnaaa _____aaaaaa __________

KIDNEY LUNG GI-lLI 3.73 UU2 1.51-EUd d.7c-Uud i

8.07-004 4.35-004 6.66-004 4.04:002-4701:002 379 9 ~ ~0 02 -~ ~ ~

3 38-004 3.e8-004 3.88-004 1

1.71;00b- --- Y. 71~-0 0 6 f.~71;00b 9.90-C07 9."0-007 9.90-007

/. s9;UO 2 5.b0-0U2 4 37-UOe l

KEl__.________aaaaas______Ba&aaa___________

KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI i T3;UUd 1.20 UUE A.dd-003 1

7.05-004 3 67-004 3 67-004 7 75-032 7.b7-002 734332- -

E.10-C05 8 10-005 a.10-005 1.07-00b-~

1 07-006 1.07:006 5.52-007 5.52-007 5.52-007

" - T710 0U1 57"E;DUc

?.69-0U2 I K E ! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B a a a a a _ _ _ _ _ _ a ol a a s a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

KIONEY LUNG GI-LLI

.UU

.UU

.UU 7.61-002 7 54-002 7.50-002

.00

.00

.00

-9

, _ -. - =

t

._.____t

. _ _.. _ _ _ _ _. ~...

'rLE-EI4(OIS)

TABIE 5.2-6 LCCaTIGN I5 CW DI5CHAPGE ESTIFhTED IX6E FATES 'IO MXIFLN ItCIVIDUAIS H cntmemAricts AT mm cucutAritc wJER DISOW4I IOI!G-A D UL T 00 S E S L

_ _ _._ _ _ S a a a a 0_ _ _ _ _ _a S 6 08 0_ __ _ _ _c a d a S a _

PER Yt P A T H n' A Y r

SKIN F'I5H BONE LIVER TOTAL BODY l

INVER TEEP A T E e.1b+CCC j Mir*CDG e. 4tr+700 1.

I DOINKING ~

2.73-C02 5.53-002 4.12-002 1.

SHORELINr

.00 ~

.00'~~

7 3 CO3 3.37-CO3 3.37-003 3.37-003 3.

. 0 D ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ' -

~SWIMEING

.00-

-- ~ 1 05-C05

~1.05-005

-~-- 1.05-005'

~

1.

BOATING

.00 i e T A1.

3.5C-005 3.50-005 3.50-005 3.

~3. n m c.154 1

.SE4CDU e~. 51 + 000 17 uuu SELECTED LOCATION LOCATION IS CW DISCHAPGC T C EN A _G E_.R _ _ _D0 S_E S

_______aSaaaa______Saaaaa______Caaaaa_________00SC__

PER YEi PATHnAY MbH SKIN BCNE L!VER TOTAL BODY TF INvERTEeRAlt 2.de+uuu

~.5e+U00 d

1. J FT'UD DRINKING 2 6a-C02 5.39-002

2. bO -00 2 1.4 1.1 00

.00 SH00ELINE 2.20-G02 1.83-002 1 85-002 1.68-002 1.C

.00

~ SWIPMING

.C 00 ~

~ ~

6. 0 6 - 00 5 ~~ ~ ~ ~6 Ob -00 5

~~~ ~ ' 6 ~. Db -00 5

~~ 6.' O BOArING

.00 3.5C-C05

- T O T A L --- --- -

2720:0U7-3 50-005 3 50-00c 3.5 e.3j+Luu 3.L3+uOu 2.yViUOu 2,. 3 SELECTED LOC A TION LOCATION IS CW DISCHARGE i

\\

C H IL 0 00SE S l

k

_______aaaaaa______aSaGag______caaaaa_________00SE__(MPCMl

- PATHUAY

... PEP YEAR 8

'F T5 H SKIN BONE LIVER TOTAL BODY INVERTEBRATE e.Sy+ GOD 3.1F4000~

THYR @

' DRINKING-~~~~~

3.77-002 5.~5T:DG1-i707-9 4.e7-002 SHORELINE

.00 ~ ~

1.53-002 1.1 ;-0(

4.59-503

. 0 0 ~~ ~

.00 ~ --

S WI MM ING -' ~ - -

3.93-r03 3.93-003 3.93-003

.Cb"7 400 ~

~- ~

30ATING

~3.77-005 3.77-005 3.93-0$

.00 s.77-COs 3.77-O' TTCra L 1.95-005 1.a5-005 1.95-005 1.95-Ok 4759:C03 2767+T00

3. 20

• COD ~

Assms tre Ido is not a cource cf drirAir>J water.

5T705001 171020C Asares att irlant wuld not te e>;cu* to tic existiv3 ruttways r

, ~. -

,,p+*

1 p

1;.pa.

LA

^

..m

-~

4

-~

a s

- = _ -

Ned. 3

/BI f

AR INTAKE)___________aaaaaa..

_aaaaaa___________

HYROID KIDNEY

' LUNG l'22001

1. lit 000

-" trT2bv001 1.11-101--

GI-LLI 71-002 3.35-002 1.58-002 5.11-002 00

.00 -

.00 37-003

.00 ~

05-005

~~

3.37-003 3.37-003 3.37-003 1.05-005 1.05-005 1 05-005-50-005 3.50-005 3.50-005 3.50-005 12=001 1.22+C00 4.ti S=0t!1 i. 7tiv001-~

>R INTAKEl___________aaaaaa_____,laaaaa_________

lYROID KIDNEY (UNG GI-LLI

/-UU2 1T21+00u 9 59-Uua 1.U0-002~

2-002 3.17-002 1.40-002 3.71-002 0~

.00 00

.00 a-002 1.88-002 1.88-002 1.88-002 6~- 0 0 5 ~ ~~

6 0 b ;UO 5 - -- - b. 0 6 0 0 5 ~

3-305 3.50-005 3 50-005 3 50-005 b. 0 L ;00 5-'

T-UUl A.eb+UUU 5.22-001

1. % -501

~.

r' 5

NTAKE)___________aaaaaa______aaaaaa._ -

ID MIONEY LUNG 22

-GI-LLI

. : ' 1. 0 5+ D0 0.

37895001 5.0bM 02 32~

2.79-002

-1.19-002 1.72-002 00'~

~

200~

13 3.93-003 3.*3-003 3 93-003

.00-

5 --- '- 3. ? ?-00 5

-~~ 3.'7 7 -0 05 -

IS 1.95-005 1.95-005~

1.95-005

- t ??x005-1 t Ob+000

- t TCS2001

-7718=D02

:. - ~, -.,a.,___,._

~

L

'H.%[*

7

;.. E.1 E*p.'h~

y f.-

y ;; n a ' w;

-*--e**%

f c.

e,-

n

WCGS-ER(OLS) 291.0 ENVIRONMENTAL _SN_GINEERING BRANCH Q?91.1 Provide the following information on the lime (ER) sludge pond:

a.

Location on the station site, including the distance from the pond wall to the cooling lake;

'r diversions; c

aterials of construction; d.

Need for and frequency of clearout and ulti-mate disposal 'of wastes removed; e.

Estimated seepage rate from the pond into the groundwater; f.

Estimated composition and flow rate of efflu-ent from the pond into the cooling lake.

R291.1 a.

The lime sicdge pond is located north of the switch yard and west of the meteorological tower (see Figure 2.4-14).

With the cooling lake at normal operating pool level (elevation 1987.0 ft),

the distance from the base of the-lime sludge pond to the cooling lake will be approximately 50 feet.

Approval to build-and operate the pond as a sludge storage f acility was obtained from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.

b.

The lime sludge pond has two diversions, a sluice i

structure and an emergency spillway.

The spill height for the sluice structure is at elevation 2003'5" and for the emergency spillway at 2004'.

c.

The lime slu?ge pond is unlined and has_been con-structed by excavating the existing grade of the pond area to a maximum height for the bottom of 1997.5' elevation.

The excavated soil (inorganic cohesive soil) was used to build the dikes around i

the pond.

The dike slopes are 3:1, vertical to horizontal.

Dike slopes are covered with either four inches of seeded topsoil or twelve inches of 1

filter type II covered by twelve inches of riprap class facing.

l d.

The lime sludge pond is sized to contain all the influent from the lime softener blowdown, carbon and sand filter backwash, and regenerative waste

'Rev. 3 I

291-1

/81 i

WCGS-E R (O LS )

R291.1 (continued) for 2 units in operation and 40 years of plant life.

The resulting lime sludge pond size is 180 acre-ft with an average depth of 7.8 ft and cor-responding surface area of 1 million square feet.

e.

The scepage rate from the lime sludge pond is ex-pected to be less than 10 gpm assuming upper bound permeability values for underlying soil and rock formations and will probably be less than 1 gpm.

The runoff into the lime sludge pond will be neg-ligibly small due to dikes on three sides and a intercepting drainage ditch on the fourth side, f.

At the end of 40 yea rs of plant operation, the sludge accumulated in the lime sludge pond for 2 units in operation is estimated to be 19 acro-ft and approximately 1 ft deep (for the influent val-ues listed in rigure 3.3-1 of the ER(OLS); values are doubled for 2 units in operation).

The re-mainder of the lime sludge pond (161 acre-ft and 6.8 ft depth) at the end of 40 years will still have sufficient capacity to accommodate the worst rainfall.

The 100 year-24 hour rainfall in the vicinity of the Wolf Creek Station is only 8 4

inches (U.S.

Commerce Weather Bureau, Technical Paper No. 40).

Also, the lime sludge pond volume wi ll. have sufficient capacity to accommodate the worst recorded wet years (from the Chanute, Kansas weather data used in the LAKET analysis) from 1949 l

to 1951 (typically, on an annual average basis, the precipitation rate in the Wolf Creek Station area is lower than the natural evaporation rate).

These three consecutive wet years would increase I

the sludge pond water level by a maximum of only 1.5 ft to form a total depth of 2.5 ft, (including l

the 1 ft sludge accumulation) leaving 4.3 ft mar-gin in the lime sludge pond.

The spillway in the lime sludge pond was origin-ally designed for use during heavy rainfalls.

How-

ever, with reduced domineralized makeup water design demand and thus, the correspondi.ng reduc-tion in pretreatment and decineraliner wastes (reduced lime softeners blowdown, carbc n and sand filter

backwash, and regenerative waste),

the spillway is no longer required even during the heaviest of rainfalls as discussed previously.

The sluice structure in the lime sludge pond is provided to drain the rain water during the con-struction and preoperation periods.

During these periods the rect _tving water body for discharges Rev.

291-2

/81

WCGS-ER(OLS)

R291.1 (continued) from the pond through the sluice structure is the cooling lake.

There will be no discharge from the pond through the sluice structure during plant operation.

1 Rev.

291-2a

/81

WCGS-ER(OLS)

R291.2 (continued) in which:

C

= Concentration at any point in the river C

= Effluent concentration g

Q

= Rate of flow of effluent g

U

= Nverage velocity of flow in the cross-section y,D

= Dispersion coefficients in the y and z D

z directions X

= Longitudinal distance Y

= Lateral distance Z

= Vertical distance As the nodel is for unbounded channel, the effect of boundaries of the channel are taken care of by using method of images.

The dispersion coefficients were calculated from the following empirical equations developed for natural streams (Ref. 1).

r log

{

=-3.547+1.378 log (f Equation 2

")

Equation 3 log

= -8.1 +

1.558 log in which:

B = Top width of flow in rivar II = Ilydraulic depth of flow

)) = Kinemstic viscosity of water The total TDS concentration in the river (C t tal) is then found by:

total ambient Where Cambient " "* *

= 400 mg/

Rev. 3 291-4

/81

\\

WCGS-E R (OLS )

l R291.2 (continued)

Different combinations of Neosho River discharge, blowdown discharge and initial effluent TDS con-centration are used in the computations.

Figure 291.2-1 is a summary of the results.

The maximum 3

flow area in the cross-section along the length of the river which has a concentration C 1 500 mg/l is computed and plotted against th6D6kowdown discharge with C as a

variable.

From these curves the blowdow3 discharges and C values O

l l

Rev.

291-4a

/81

WCGS-ER(OLS) 0291.3 Outline the derivation of the concentrations given (ER) in Table 3.6-1.

Are the values for the cooling (2.4) lake averages over the whole lake - are they steady state values?

Discuss why the normal val-ues for the Redmond Reservoir are so much higher than those given in Table 2.4-11.

1 R291.3 Table 3.6-1 lists the chemical constituents of the water in the John Redmond Reservoir.and the Wolf Creek cooling lake (for one and two units in oper-ation) covering a period of 1949 through 1964 which includes a 2 percent chance drought.

Since the regulated storage of the. John Redmond Reser-voir did not begin until September 1,

1964, the John Redmond Reservoir water quality data in Table 3.6-1 were developed on the basis of published Neosho River water quality data (obtained from

" Water Resources Data for Kansas," U.S. Geological Survey and Kansas State Board of Health, Division of Sanitation).

With these Neosho River data as l

input, the LAKET program was used to predict the total dissolved solids (TDS) levels in the John Redmond Reservoir.

The predicted TDS levels in the reservoir provided data for the calculation of the cycles of concentration (the cycles of concentration is defined as the ratio of the con-centration of TDS in the circulating water to that j

in the makeup water and represents the effect of evaporation on the concentration of dissolved r

minerals).

The concentrations of the other con-stituents in the water, listed in Table 3.6-1, were then determined by simply increasing these constituents concentrations for the Neosho River by the cycles of concentration, i.e.,

cycles of concentration times the concentration of the constituents.

The cooling lake water quality data listed in Table 3.6-1 were developed in a similar fashion.

The John Redmond Reservoir water quality data were used as input into LAKET to predict the TDS levels in the cooling lake.

The LAKET program calculates the average lake TDS concentration every three hours.

The cycles of concentration were then determined which was used to cycle up the other water quality constituents.

However, the cooling lake data includes sulfuric acid. addition (for scale control in the condenser).

This means that, with the added acid, the TDS and sulfate levels are increased by more than the cycles of concen-tration value, while the alkalinity is reduced due to a lower pH, The effects of acid addition are described in ER(OLS) Section 3.6.2.

Rev.

291-7

/81

WCGS-ER(OLS)

Q291.6 Where is the service water discharged?

Is_ sulfur-(ER) ic acid added to the service water?

If so, how much is added?

R291.6 The service water is discharged into the circulat-ing water (CW) system downstream of the condensers prior to CW system leaving the power block.

Sul-furic acid is not added to the service water system.

The principle expected corrosion products from water passage through the circulating and service water systems will be from the piping and heat exchange rs.

The concentrations of these corrosion products will b2 low, on the order of ppb or lesq.

The potential chemical species are summarized below:

Carbon Steel - F 0

2 3'

• 3 4' (O" 3' Fe 03.3H 0 2

90-10 Cupronickel - Cu 0, Cu0, NiCu0 Ni 0 2

2, 34 Stainless Steel - F 0

2 3' 3 4'

"'3' 0

e0 F

2 3' "2 2 4' 2

4, NiCr 0 Ni 24, 3 4'

'3 4 The estimated release of corrosion products in the circulating water system was based on the maximum rate of corrosion expected during initial startup for conservatism.

This rate of 20 mils per year was taken from Figure 7-1, page 7-1 of the Nation-al Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Basic Corrosion Course, second printing, April, 1971.

The maximum corrosion conditions were taken as un-protected low-carbon steel with tap water at 100'F i

and 6 ppm dissolved oxygen concentration.

The concentrations were calculated by taking the con-servative corrosion rate times the entire area of piping and dividing by the volume of water flowing through the system.

The corrosion rate of the piping should drop sub-i stantially from that experienced during initial operation of the system when protective oxide formation occurs.

Rev. 3 291-10

'81 i

.WCGS-ER(OLS)

R291.6 (continued)

Experience with passivation of steel piping has shown that once the piping is conditioned, espe-cially for water containing the concentrations of scale producing chemicals as found around Wolf Creek, corrosion rates of 1 mil per year or less are expected.

]

The concentration of the species will depend upon the ratios of metals present_ in the system, temp-erature and chemical composition of the water.

The underground service water piping will - have cathodic protection which will reduce corrosion in this pipe.

Rev. 3 291-10a

/81

WCGS-ER(CLS) j 0291.7 According to the OLER, Ammonia, Hydrazine, Potas-(ER) siwa Chromate, and Turco Decon 4521 and 4520 are use d in the power block system.

Provide estimates of the usage of'these chemicals.

Also discuss the ultimate fate of these chemicals.

Identify the pathways to the environment from the plant and indicate the amount and concentrations of these chamicals in the pathways.

I R291.7 Ammonia 1

Expected blowdown from normal operations should not exceed.25 ppm NH FSAR Table 10.3-4).

The blowdown from Hot Skan(See dby is less than 10 ppm.

All other conditions should have NH n entration 3

of less-than-or-equal-to.5 ppm.

Hydrazine FSAR Table 10.3-4 shows hydrazine concentration i

as75-100 ppm during cold hydro and cold wet lay-up.

Otherwise the hydrazine content should not exceed the 0 by 5 ppb.

The maximum 0, concentra-2 tion in blo.down and feedwater is lets than 100 ppm.

l The pathway to the environment for NH and hydra-zine - would be from condenser tube le2kage to the circulating water.

Potassium Chromate Potassium Dichromate is used in the component cooling water system (CCWS).

Normal operational l

levels of K Cr0 in the CCWS are 175-225 ppm 2

4 Ini1ial system conditioning will require (Cr0 4 )p.pm (Cr04) for the first week after-filling 1000 the system Leakage wastes generated during normal system j

operation are routed to the dirty radwaste system for processing.

The initial filling residue and any subsequent infrequent system drain down for component repairs or testing would be collected, tested and disposed of in an approved manner, e.g.

wastes treated to 3

bring the chromium concentrations to less than 5 ppm, or recycled to surge tanks in the CCWS.

Treated wastes would either be removed to a dis-i posal facility or the lime sludge pond using port-able containers.

1 Turco Decon 4521 and 4502 (not 4520)

Turco Decon is used to decontaminate parts /

equipment and its usage is dependent on the work being done.

When used, Turco Decon 4521 is mixed Rev. 3 291-11

/81

,w-n

,,e,,

l

}

WCGS-ER(OLS) i l

R291.7 (continued) with water, 8 oz to the gallon; and 2 lbs of Turco Decon 4502 is mixed with a gaUon of water.

Turco Des 7n is disposed as drummed solid waste via the chem cal waste tank.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls It is the intent of KG&E to have no polychlor-inated biphenyl (PCB) contaminated equipment on the WCGS site subsequent to operation of the plant.

The Environmental Service Department of KG&E is currently conducting a program to ensure that this intent is met.

As part of this program, the per-manent transformers have been tested for and found not to contain PCBs.

Rev. 3 291-11a

/81

e STATE OF KANSAS DEPAllTalENT OF IIEALTil AND ENVillONAIENT DIVISION OF ENVIllONhlENT FERMIT m

s.u For Operating A Trocessing Facility Or A Solid Waste Disposal Area In accordance with the provisions of Kansas Statutes Annotated 654107 PEll311SSION IS IIEllElW GIIANTED to KMSAS GAS MD ELECTRIC _C0" At!Y N AME OF MUNICITALITT. INSTITUTION DISTRICT, CORTORATION OR TERSON to operate a SLUDGE STORAGE FACILITY location SEC.

6, T 205, R 16E, COFFEY COUNTY in conformity with plans and specifications approved by the Department of llealth and Environment, and the following-named conditions and requirements to wit:

1.

THI5 PE Rfil T IS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS AND MUST BE REtJEWED ON OR PRIOR TO JUNE 30. 1980. AtJD EACH SUCCEEDING YEAR.

2.

THOSE GENERAL CONDITIONS LISTED Ot1 THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PERMIT.

IlE AL Dolic at Topeka, this 19 Til day of JUNE 19 []

a n

Y/

//

A///

4

/ / / " DEPARTMENYOF litACTll AND ENVIRON8'.51/

,f/

~

~

.,m

..........e........

General Conditions 1.

This permit shall not release the permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by Kansas statutes or local ordinances and shall remain in force sub-f ject to all conditions and limitations now or hereafter imposed by law.

The permit shall be permissive only and shall not be construed as estopping or limiting any claims against the permittee for damage or injury to person or property, or to any waters of the state resulting from any acts, operations, or omissions of the permittce, its agents, contractors, or assigns, nor as estopping or limiting any legal claim of the state against the permittee, its agents, contractors, or assigns, for damage to state property, or for any violation of the tenas or conditions of this permit.

2.

The use of the disposal system shall be limited to the treatment and/or dis-posal of the waste materials or substances described in the plans and/or per-mit application or associated material on file with the Department.

3.

This permit is subject to modification and may be suspended at any time for failure to comply with the terms stated herein or provision of any other applicable regulations or standards of the Department or its predecessors.

4 This permit is issued with the understanding that the state <1 conditions are explanatorj and are not limiting so as to estop subsequent establishnent of appropriate additional clauses herein at the discretion of the Department if it is considered necessary in erder to prevent or reduce possible pollution of the environment because of changed or unforeseen circumstances.

5.

The permittee or assigns shall defend. indemnify, and hold harmless the State of Kansas, its of ficers, agents, and employees officially or personally against

11 actions, claims, demands whatsoever which may arise from or on acccunt of the issuance of this pen,it or the construction or maintenance of any facili-ties hereunder.

6.

This permit is not transferable.

The permittee agrees to noti fy the Depart-ment i-

. ting prior to making any change in ownership or operating lease or contract responsibility at least thirty (30) days in advance of the date of trP~aer.

7.

When a change in ownership or cperator occurs, the following information shall be submitted to secure a new permit.

flew application for permission to construct and operate a land a.

disposal area, b.

The new owner / operator assumes responsibility in writing for existing violations; and The new owner / operator submits satisfactory plans for correct-c.

ing violations, d.

The new owner / operator substantiates in writing that he has copies of all approved raps and plans, or The new owner / operator submits new plans, maps, and data e.

for review and approval.

8.

Certification of completion of the project shall be made within three (3) months af ter the project is finished.

i asts..,>

ll 1 : j 'O!.1 } ih ' nil l O l' M,l t Clt s ' l.' (:etit t,3 f. I ngl St.ition - correy county, 1:a n na -

NillSt* Of lYiIISils.. noutn1 r UCHt Lit. Gmer.w l

s JA NN!INIllkM5l[blllNM[\\bl/ldNbM[U{$0lE{U}$i[l[.h i

)

' ~,r.gp),

omant r. euntn. secremy reccu. ms.is ccuo

~ " '

APPLICAT10tl FOR APPROVAL TO ESTABLISH AtlD OPERATE IliDUSTRIAL OR C0ilSTRUCT10ti LAtt0 O!SPOSAL AREA 1.

Applicant's flame Kansas can and c1 2ct.ric company Address P

'] Uco 20R

Wichita, Ka n t;a n 7.! a l (Street er Rural Ecute)

(City & State)

(Op)

Telephone (316)261-6504 -- Ilichael c 11 iller 2.

Political Subdivisicn not Aiplicabic l

(Unit of Gover"Tment - County, City, Icwnsnip) 3.

State Acency Private Individual or Firm x

Other if other - explain

4.. Site location County cutfey

, Section 6

, Township 203, Range LG:

S.

Is this facility part of an officially adopted solid waste manec: cent plan?

Yes ilo I f yes, iden t,i fy tha t plan 6.

Type of site applied for:

Indus tria l Censtruction Demolition Other If other, explain _

7.

Site Acdress l' " Do 3 0 "'

nurlinnton, 1:a n:;a:.

"(. ci a m (Street t< umber, Rocc, HigowTy) 8.

Site Area (acres)10,500 Area to be used for cisposal (acres) 23.3 9.

Provide Sketch of Site (attach) See Attachment 1

10.

Site owned by applicant X

Site leased by applicant If site is leased, please fill in the folicwing infomation:

Owner of Record WL al'p li ca bl e Address City State Zip Lease negotiated in, 11.

Is the site an existing disposal site?

Is the site a proposed r.ew si*.e?

x Part of an approved site for an EJ ectric Generating Station presently under 12.

Land characteristics (general description) construct. ion.

13.

Drainage (Provide sketch of drainage facilities and contour map) a.

fla tural Acres b.

Storm Se,iers Acres c.

Farm Tile Acres d.

Open Ditch Acres

<?.

Ilo t-Applicitm-See Attachment 2 14.

Estimate site acreage devoted to following uses:

a.

Heavilv Ucoded 0

~

Light Sr ca T

Grasses cc Pasture O Cultivated o

b.

Estimated acreage to be cleared 32.5 c.

Proposed rathod of clearing Build Sludge Pond 15.

Soil Classification - Frcn soil conservation district or county agen:

(Do not complete if soil survey or drill logs are attached)

MA Y, Sand 4^

! Silt Texture Classification U^

C1ay n

16.

If sufficient cover material is not available at the site, where vill it be obtained?

Not.,pplicable What kind 0; cover material is on-site?

t!ot applicable

17.

Land use penaitted under official land use plan within one mile radius (If there is a land use map please attach \\.

South West North Eas t a.

Residential o

o o

o b.

Commercial 0

o o

o Light Industrial, 0

0 0

0 c.

d.

Heavy Industrial 0

0 0

0 e.

Rural 0

0 0

0 f.

Mixed 0

0 0

o (If land is not zened, use "0"; if land use agrees with :cning,.Tark "Z";

if land use and zoning do not agree, mark "V")

18.

Are there any nearby wells? Yes No 19.

Access roads serving the site a.

City d.

State b.

Tcwnship e.

Interstate c.

County x

f.

Other (explain) 20.

Types of read surface serviaq the site (indicate whether en or off site) a.

Concrete e.

Gravel b.

Asphalt x

f.

Crushed Stone c.

Seal Ccat g.

Dirt d.

Soil Cement h.

Other 21.

Type of Operation a.

Trench b.

Cut and Cover c.

Area d.

Parp e.

Other or combination.mer t rea tm m t-1.i n. - n i n i<ie. t i r.pm.a t (Attach detailed recor.:cendations) 22.

Service Areas a.

Disposal site to serve:

City Township

.inty Business -

Others b.

'.lill site be open to the general public? Yes No

_3

22.

Service Areas (contd)

Litt oublic and private collectors who are expected to use the 19.ndfi'.

c.

(If city or coanty issues collection licenses, attach list of licensees.)

COLLECTOR PRIVATE PUBLIC Not aiplicable 23.

Restrictions a.

Types of solid wastes accepted:

P.esi den ti al Industrial x

Ccmtercial Ocmolition Agricultural Other b.

P.aterials accepted at disposal site:

all Futrescible Junked Automobiles All Noncombus tibles Large Appliances All Corbus tibles Ocmolition Wastes Garbage Construction Debris Dead Animals Street Sweepings haste Oil Tires Sewage Solids Hazardous Materials Other (speci fy) 5'a te r t rea tme nt. lime r,1udge 24.

Employees and Equipmeu r Number of employees on site (average daily)

I35 a.

b.

Equipment on site (average usage) uni applicabir 3

1.

Dragline or shovel excavator NA 2.

Scraper (sel f-propelled)

MA 3.

Tractors (track or rubber tire, bulldozer, or highli f t loader)

UA 4.

irucks (other equipment - specify)

MA

, o 3.

Estirated i; umber of Loads Daily (estimate quantities in tons or cubic yards)

T0fts CUSIC YARDS a.

Frrm public collection vehicles M^

N

b.

Frca private collection vehicles NA MA c.

From other vehicles, (specify) ha 3.

Estimated Capacity of Site a.

In cubic yards 400,000 b.

In years

0

/.

Prcposed Ccmpleted Site Use a.

Parks d.

Parking b.

Playgrcunds e.

Light Industrial c.

Agricdlture f.

E1cetric concrating station 3.

Proposed l'aximum Finished Elevation (show finished contours on plan):

na 4

9.

Sumary

=

O

C.

oo+.***++++,+**+*************

• • • +++,,*++,*.

Permit Fee Enclos2dT)0.00 Performance Bond Posted (If required by local agency)

Glenn L Kocut.or./ //

r-

/p /,i,

, ' 6 / *,.,, c /t.,'

vice l're

'e n t - op, r : t. i on n

/.

Signature of Applicanc fitle

~

Kansas Gas and I; lect ric Company Orgacization Cate APPLICA:li.

.,,,...,,,..,,,'lI L L f!O T ',IR I T E G ELO'.f TH i s L I::E Review by Local Planning and Zoning Board Having Jurisdiction:

Approved Disapproved (If special pernit is required by planning and cning boerd, please attach a cecy to this application.)

Signature of ioning Acministrator County or City Bearc

~

Date

+,+n+,.,;

>=

., +r

...a

,a 2,;

-x

+n

+, +,

Review by County Ccmissicn or County Solid Waste Beard if klailable Approved Disapproved Corr r.en t3.

Signature of Diairman Date b

e 11 l.ew i n ' lt. Itcischmann l'nvi r. Deit. l'i l e K. Johnson ID rile (original)

Nltllt* taf h illlSils... Joun ca,s.n co, err.o.

~ ' "J.

b I Il h

!. )'

b

.3 Il bb

/

kN b b N.s '

I

bOh.

Jcttp*t f Har' ins $ccrefary m

t err a.

a.ia*,s U 620 913eA?91f0 4557c July 7, 1981

.f

~30

,4 4 .p aQ e hr, Q

Lansas Gas and Electric Company lg/

e, a

'.2,,g :s'

?,

P. O. Box 208 c,

pi, ff Wichita, Kansas 67201 A 44'

&y Renewal of Permit tio. 341 v,yU E2#

Dear Sir:

The Departn'ent of IIcalth and Environcient is in receipt of the permit renewal fee for your Solid Waste Disposal Facility as required by K.S. A.

Supp. 65-3407(d).

This letter will serve as the pennit renewal f]r the period L3eginning July 1, 1981 and ending June 30, 1982.

All conditions, requirements, and conformity with plans and specifica-t ions r eferred to and sho.en on the permit issued the 19th day of June 1979 remain in effect.

Sincerely yours, D'd. ion of Environment lj~ p J

/L' f A 71, '

Charles 11. Linn, P.E., Chief Engineering and Sanitation Section Bureau of Environmental Sanitation ni.l cc:

District Office