ML20031D932
| ML20031D932 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20031D926 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-454-81-11, NUDOCS 8110140381 | |
| Download: ML20031D932 (2) | |
Text
w Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-454 As a result of the inspection conducted on July 27 and August 26-28, 1981, 4
and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following violations were (d-38 ified:
1.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V!, requires that measures be estab-lished to control the issuance e de:uments which prescribe all activities affecting quality. These measures shall assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy.
The Byron Startup Manual, Revision 4, requires in Section 1.4.4 that changes to the Startup Hanual be initiated by the originator, draft-ed, typed and proofread by the Startup Group, reviewed by the Start-up Group, concurred in by Site Quality Assurance, and authorized by the Project Marat;cr.
Contrary to the above:
The licensee did not adequately review and proofread all of the changes made by Revision 4 to the Startup Manual for categorizing major and minor procedure changes. Criteria written for making major test pro-cedure changes was the same as that used for making minor test pro-cedure changes.
This is a Severity Level VI violation (Supplement II).
2.
10 CFR 50, Appendix P. Criterion V, states in part that " activities affecting quality sh ll be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings,... and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions procedures or drawings."
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, requires that all testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service is identified and performed in accordance with written test procedures.
Contrary to the above:
a.
~Fe licensee did not adequately " verify that all instrumentation
'ndix A is within current calibration intervals" in accord-
- s h paragraph 6.2 of construction test procedure 2.63.810, Coolant Cold F drostatic Test. Four of the instruments 7
s, i
'8110140331 811001 PDR ADOCK 05000454 g
Appendix A listed in Appendix A of the completed test did not have any cali-bration date listed. One of the instruments which should have been calibrated was listed as calibrated on 1/1/90N (indicatirg not able to be calibrated). Additionally, the " current calibra-tion intervals" were described as "not yet established" for most of the instruments.
b.
The licensee exceeded the pressure band specified in the Reactor Coolant Cold Hydrostatic Test, 2.63.810.
The minimum pressure to demonstrate satisfactory strength and tightness was met and the calculated over pressure point was not exceeded, however, the pressure band of 3102-0+12.5 psig specified in the proce-dure for the 10 minute hold was exceeded.
c.
The licensee did not adequately " verify all in;talled instru-mentation in the SDP (System Documentation Package) it-within current calibration intervals" as required by paragrapn 6.3 < ~
Preoperational rest 2.21.10, 125 V DC Distribution. The Tec.
Staf f representatives stated that 0AD does not have calibration intervals available yet for the instrument listed.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Sepriement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office witlin thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) cor-rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Sec'.ian 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
Udi,Ih.i_UI_'$IhM_ [. C.(!IdblIN
(,,m,, I tggg Dated C. E. Norelius, 9trector Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection
.