ML20031D668

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Evaluation of 810806 Application for Amend to License SNM- 1852 Adding 810806 Date to Identify New co-holders of Matls License & Permits Storage of New Fuel Assemblies Prior to Installation of Fire Detection & Alarm Sys.Amend Approved
ML20031D668
Person / Time
Site: 07002901, 07002940
Issue date: 09/21/1981
From: Bidinger G
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:
Shared Package
ML20031D667 List:
References
NUDOCS 8110140006
Download: ML20031D668 (2)


Text

. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

[e ik U

h h

O d'

MP SEP 211981 DOCKET NO: 70-2901 Unit 3 70-2940 Unit 2 APPLICANT: Southern California Edison Company San Diego Gas and Electric Company City of Anaheim, California City of Riverside, California San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 SU3 JECT:

REVIEW 0F AMENDMENT APPLICATION DATED AUGUST 6,1981 FOR CHANGE OF NAME AND FOR USE OF A CONTINUOUS FIRE WATCH IN THE FUEL HANDLING BUILDING IN MATERIALS LICENSE NOS.

SNM-1852 AND 1879

Background

The license currently identifies Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric as the co-holders of the two licenses. The application for amendment requests that the cities of Riverside and Anaheim be added as co-holders of the license.

In addition, the application provides for a continuous fire watch in the New Fuel Area and the Spent Fuel Pool Area until fire detection devices are installed and operating.

Discussion The application for change of name is signed only by the current co-holders of the licenses. The cities of Riverside and Anaheim, co-owners, have recently been added as co-holders of the construction permits and the operating license applicatiors for San Onofre Units 2 and 3.

Mr. Robert Fonner, ELD, stated that being parties to the ongoing proceedings is sufficient justification for adding the two cities as co-holders of the storage only license.

Amendment No.1 to both SNM-1852 and SNM-1879, dated August 11, 1981, incorporated a requirement, via Condition 15 for a continuous fire watch until the fire detection and alarm devices were installed. Because the subject amendment application incorporates che essential requirements of Amendment No.1, Condition 15 can be deleted.

In a discussion on Septenber 4, 1981, Mr. Derrick Moturio, Southern California Edison, stated that flame detectors, rather than smoke detectors and heat rate of rise detectors, were being installed; that the applicants' safety and analysis report orncry sunsaut) 8EidiiOOO6 8109J0' PDR ADOCK 07002901 C

can)

PDR

...l..

.l.

NRC FORM 3tB HO 80)NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

' " *329 82. l s

~

'g e * * ' ' ** "Q g-

{

y..

y f

g SEP 211981 was being revised; and that the NRR fire safety reviewer had agreed to the change. Mr. Greg Harrison, NRR, confirmed this statement. The NRR Pmject Manager, Mr. Harry Rood,and the Region V Section Chief, Mr. Tolbert Young, have no objection to this amendment.

Conclusior ud Recomendation It is the staff position that the proposed amendment will have no adverse effect on health and safety or on the environment. Approval of the amendment application is recommended.

Original signed by George H. Bidinger G. H. Bidinger Urar.fum Pmcess Licensing Section Uranium Fuel Licensing Branch

  1. I Division of Fuel Cycle and g, gf{1 signed By:

Material Safety Appmved by:

W. T. Crow, Section Leader DISTRIBUTION:

( Docket-File 70-2940 70R NMSS r/f FCUF r/f FCUP r/f GHBidinger (2)

LTyson WTCrow JBlaylock RErickson JRobertson i

" ' * ' >....EC.VP,h[....fC,l)f,

,,.. F C V R.,..

'"^"*>.GHaidinger/.;j....L.Ty.s o n.....WICY,dP.Y.

o^n >. 9./.p/../. 81...

.... /..gN... 81 9

9

...../..u /. 81 NRC FORM 318 4tO 80l NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

_