ML20031A116

Advises That Since Aslab Has Approved All Seismic Conclusions of Fact Made by Aslb,Nrc Regulations Specifically Provide That Commission Will Not Review Matter

ML20031A116
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	09/17/1981
From:	Burgener C HOUSE OF REP.
To:	Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8109210011
Download: ML20031A116 (2)

Text

~ - ~ E-- b.

ry... w y ;,,.ww.r f _ p.,,,,4 x.

m..-..

f

f. _ _$.l

.$_.Ne?.ih f'

i.?

.O 2lS E.T e _ - UntDb;

• y t

g.

-;; %g* N ; ; rf.

.a... _'

_ _ _ __ _ y.

~

er.4 orem

• e. f r a ataswa r

• a

~: NL D LT ato

>=tss : coor roe

(

).

.: son o.o=

.caa caav c

can a wa c vao 7 acre av sac-v a tus o cotts cv.

wet wi u ow - ese o vtv ov.

,,,y r

t_

0 imanen io

-omt oc o= ce*

m=cto ato i

• ite v5 2ERch' M R O D.

- g y

a(,3 Hon. Hunnio a. r iiai

=

,g1 m J.JJ """ "",

=

Cuatr., n.m.C.

9 t;

. 2 g p'1 8 68 Ts.

1717 a street, N.W.

DM%%

e/

Mashington ce t

i ou r t

20555

$3

/ +

IT BAS COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT THE COPMISSION INC IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TQOULOW, TRIpAT THE 17TH OF SEFTEMER, WITH THE OFFICE 4

Of POLICT EVALUATION TO CONSIDER THE SUBJECT OF DIAELO CANTON NUCLEAR POWER ruurr.

o nL r

I I UNDER. STAND THAT REQUESTS HAVE BEEN-MADE FOR AN INDEFENDENT REVIEW OF THE SEISMIC 5AFETY ISSUES WRICH MAVE BEEN FULLY RESOLVED THROUCH TOUR C00 MISSION'S PROCEDURES.

I NOTE THAT THE OFFICE OF POLICY EVALUATION MAY PROVIntINDEPENDENT TECHNICAL EVALUATIO" OF SELECTED CASES PRESENTED TO TEE COOMISSION FOR AIAJUDICATION."

THIS IS TO REMIND THE CoheGSSION OF ITS CWN RECULATIONS WHICE CLEARLY ESTABLISH THAT NO TECHNICAL SEISMIC ISSUE INYOLVINC DIABLO CANTON HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION FOR WHICH IT CAN CALL UPOR THE OFFICE OF POLICT EVALUATION TO PROVIDE A TECHNICAL EVALUATION.

REGUIATION 2.786(4)(11) IS CONTROLINC.

IT FROVIDRS:

"(ii) A peticion for review of inatters of fact w111 mot be granted unless it appears that the Atoenic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board has re-solved a factual issue accessary for decision in a clearly erroneous manner (npRE)

,,sm vsn P. Clair W. Burgener

..atu

" m a st **m a s.a w s

,,3 GWA087964

/,c,ge,,

~

~-

~

ri 7

. a c e - :.

hh_ h

.,y,,.n NOTE: SHADED ARE AS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY.

, 7 SEP 17 G

_5 0

l Office of the Netary g

g Docketi-ienice k 'd 8109210011 810917 PDR ADOCK 05000275 G

PDR x cc

b"

.u.

4.

T 9.,

S e sm,n un g flMt J 08T T

'%*E#

AL AS'C a FM NL.

., pac,

.g yg g y S ACE

, CODI C

FOS LT 84EG L P*lSS

( * ).

orm.7 NP VALU(O$

COLLICT

,C A N eM 300.,

sNTma a

oap

.. a,.,

--.o.o co e --

., o.

..,~

g-

'd D to enna.e oc 4=os s4a E h ta=*A.i:C'*21 di" r2 m,

~

~

ionsas J

i7T7E oa y/

Washingteri cootf a counta*

D.C.

t

20515 s

contrary to the resolution of that same issue by the Arosaic Safety and.

)

Licensing Board;"

l THE AFFEAL BOARD HAS AFFROVED IN ALL RESPECTS THE SEISMIC CONCLUSIONS OF

/

FACT MADE ET THE ATUNIC SAYETY LICENSING BOARD.

TRL ABOVE REGUIATIN SPECIFICALLY PROVIDES THAT IN SUCH CIRCURSTANCES 71tE COPMISSION WILL NOT REVIEW TKE MATTER.

IR VIEW OF THE EXTRAORDINARY DELATS ALREADT ENCOUNTERED IN THE COVERNMENT'S CONSI.DERATION OF THE AFFLICATION FOR iTMIS PLANT, AN ADDITIONAL DELAY TO ACCOMMODATE ANY INDEFENDENT REVIEW IN CONTROVENTION OF RF4MTION 2.786(4)(11),

WOULD BE A SERIOUS NLOW TO THE GOAL OF ELIMINATING THE LICENSING DELAYS WH3CH HAVE BEEN.THE FOC"JS OF ATTENTION BEFORF. OUR APPROFRIATIDMS SUBCotMITTEE ON ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMDIT.

j 1

CLAIR W. BURCENER MEMBER OF CONCRESS l

-re,sh

.e-D U '. *

• U-r,,,__, _ Rep _. _Cla ir.ft Bu,rgege r ___ __ _

[ 8ca"C"'

,,g, 6ti s an

~

/

WMM cott

-. a:c '.."

a

( accatts NOTE SHADED AREAS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

" ' ' " ~

/

. -.