ML20031A067
| ML20031A067 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 09/14/1981 |
| From: | Snyder B, Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Hovey G, Hukill H METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8109180346 | |
| Download: ML20031A067 (2) | |
Text
-
SEPTEMBER 1 4 1981 A
DISTRIBUTION W/0 ENCLOSURE EXCEPT AS NOTED W/*:
De s ts Nos. 50-289
- Docket File-2 ORB #4 Rdg and 50-320 NRC PDR DEisenhut LPDR JStolz TERA RJacobs PSIC HSilver Mr. Henry D. Hukill, Vlce President EHyl ton and Director, TMI-l BSnyder g
~
Metropolitan Edison Company TMI Site Pouch
/.
P. O. Box 480 OELD C
C4 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 AE0D d,2 N'
Y d-'
- IE-3 4
2 Mr. Gale Hovey, Vice President
- ACRS-10 and Director, THI-2 Gray File-2
' 4 3Ep 1"7,19M
- 1 C-Metropolitan Edison Company GMcCorkle
,. f P. O. Box 480 4
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Dear Mr. Hukill and Mr. Hovey:
The purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention a number of items concerning your physical protection program which require action.
In the case of TMI-1, resolution is needed before restart. These matters fall into three major areas, i.e.,
perimeter detection capability, Safeguards /IE issues, and comments relative to your proposed Revisions 10 and 11 to'your physical protection plan. A brief discussion relative to each of these are:s is set forth under the appropriate caption below.
PERIMETERDETECTIONCAPABILIH A considerable period of time has transpired since the installation of your perimeter detection systems. You have been afforded ample time to bring these systems into adjustment to provide the capability to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 73:55. Thir has been a matter of discussion with your security personnel on several occasions (during site visits of October 30,1979, July 29 and December 30, 1980, and August 11-12, 1981).
Your operational exper:ience with these systems as confirmed during our rost recent visit indicates a need to seek alternative measures which will provide the required detection capability.
It is requested that you provide a suggested solution to this problem along with your firm schedule for completion within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Pending implementation of an acceptable system, it is also requested that you reexamine and restate the compensatory measurcs in place so that their my acceptability may be revalidated at this level.
xo JOINT IE/ SAFEGUARDS ISSUES em SO As a result of security plan reviews, site visits conducted by Office of 4
Inspection and Enforcement personnel and by Divicion of Safeguards staff, Om a number of matters have been identified which indicate the need for revisions g
to your security plan. These matters are incorporated in the enclosure to gg this letter along with other issues.
%*/
ft
A **
- y.,
- y
.:t:
!fr. Henry D. Hukill Mr. Gale Hovey,
PLAN REVISI0 tis 10 t 11 Certain of your pmposed 50.54(p) changes have been accepted.
In certain instances we disagree with your finding that changes to your plan.would not decniase security.
In those instances apprppriate coment has been incorgorated in the enclosure to this letter. Since we have not accepted all.of your o0.54(p) changes as valid, an administrative problem arises in connection with.page changes to your plan. Please submit revised pages for Revisions,10 and 11 to.
incorporate only those changes which we have accepted. Care should be exercised not to elininate fron your plan those itens which we have not considered appro-priate for changing under the provisions of 50.54(p).
For your convenience, wa have parentheti_cally. identified those_ sections of the plan relating to each of the above captions in the enclosure. Also enclosed for your use in responding to our coment regarding para. S.3.1.3, _ Rev.10, is a copy of Review Guideline #7, dated August,18,1981._ __
Since there are a neder of issues involved relative to your physical.. protection plan, it is suggested that a meeting'be arranged between your representatives.
IE personnel, ncrbers of this Office )and nenbers of the Division of Safeguards, it!5S. The enclosure contains 2.790(d information.
Since rely, eogIGUML $1GNED B'l m; y, stoLZ" John F. Stolz, t,hief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing, flRR original signed by Bernard J. Snyder, Progran Director TMI Progran Office, t{RR,
Enclosures:
~
I 1.
Coments on Security Plan 2.
8/18/81 Review Guideline 7 Rev. _2 4
cc w/o enclosures:
See next page EllCLOSURE C0flTAlfiS SECURI7-RELATED IflFORMAT10N TO BE llITilllELD FR0!!
.(/)
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE i
, e /.,JN, #
- omc,
. 0.RB,#,4,L,
,,C,0,
- 4,;,D,L,,,,,,,PDd
,,,;@R,,,.[..,,.,,.......
D 1
RJacobs c JSt BSn c r
suauwe)
..... ~..... - ~..
~ ~ ~.. - ~. - ~..
.......[............../..../.8.....1................
... /.1../..81 9
.. /....../. 81 9
9 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom sm-m-se Nnc ronu ais oo.aoi nscu ono
_