ML20030C671
| ML20030C671 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 08/07/1981 |
| From: | Garcia D, May E, Maya E, Nellen C, Sherwin T AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108270605 | |
| Download: ML20030C671 (4) | |
Text
_.,_.,
bdS.
.,.c.[4..o.7. 7.5;.%
.; r 'N Y
,V, (cy y!nx,-
ll.'j iy
%{ % g,. # f /g 8!( L J ' $;-
- m a
2 01981
- e )
L_
- .e
./
U.S. MJCtf Aa trc AATC81 ;-g gv i
Q
. Y.,
cowssee
,s
/
,3.
1 s
'e..a, g \\
y musmm- - --
___' -N AREASONABLE' h
MiFROMPSE< SOLUTION ~ ~ 'f g
3
.
- i W.3. 3i CO g
{
sy.s.,
o E
n CONVERT E
y J.
dr '
DIABLO CANYDN-g I
F g
~4^~ (3 U.S.. Nuclear, Plants Have Been Converted'-.
to l' l
l e-
- A TNuclea/P Diablo is unacceptable to me.
r
- . t., 3,.
g
- "- DJablo',s projected life-spart of 35 years is not l
- ' '. Treasonable.when considering the risks associated
~ j g"-[M r
" ' ith' tite plant s location (3 miles fiom the. active n.
!,t
. sgri Fault). nuclear waste dlsposa -l grje lerrfs. and.
,l nselfgehb.s%p : '
g.g,i
~5 l
inadequateevacuation rdutes.
y
- =>'* s:
f li l.' h, ] support the blockadel a ce
- e i.. k. -
Yk%L-M L E U.
- p
- Gw E
l
. ~ ? y 9 ~c-g _..,., _. _,,_ - _ - _[_.
y. _... Q.- wswuter.
y E
, - 3,.
~
Q
_,,~A46%k%fnCC&,i:'l d
Name (please print)
E pi Jut.
4g
'g,,7 Lwy[,. [
I I
I e,;*d.ita f
, U' Qts :
. _z. _g o
.g l
.i
~
g E
N.R.d.
8 b5 ?
~
3
~
I E
S ige mE
/
Nuclear Regulatory Commission I
w
// O l +:;i h f T 1717 H. Street NaW'.
nkq
. 'N gI W$ '.. wa*iasma. oc 20555
/
L ss W i
c -;
g%D T**
E ;.,! $ k..
. n, e, +. -
m
.; a
,'I
\\"
ub
~ [,j%.a..
,.REEM1RM2SEEE EE EEEE E
8108270605 810807 PDR ADOCK 05000275 pon H
8d'.c2 g 1
rT o o sSV-u.s. g %,e,,a J:
e
.\\ \\
s
\\co
' ' i,,,,, \\
j i
1
-,menammummunm M M M M M M M E E l
E
., COMMUNITY SAFETY IS THE ISSUti ~ '
. Please Reconsider The Operation of Diablo Diablo Canyon was dangerously sited l'
, h -, 2% miles from an active earthquake fault.
l
$ " iYdu.afd not allowind us die time folr a l
i
~
safe-workable and tested evacuation l
. plan be ore making Diablo radioactive.
f
' Q, ^ _You are responsible for trie safety'of our' - famil
- This is }kot a pr5 or anti-buclear stand.
r l
This is a stand for community safety.
l
. 1 . Q. r j ~ '
JLvJM l
(signature) s h----- -------.,-----^,--
w
.N a
I Name(pleasebrinD I
k M"O4
'T '
N# E '
aty #ecade d 'f do E C00c' 3 l
Address I
countyhed?UN'[te_
"' il'*
Y s y s,,/d l
/h pver -
c503 3
N.R.C.
I Nuclear Regulatory Commission
//6 l
1717 H. Street fl.W.
Washington, D.C. 20555 I
M eH staDieHere Einu m u m m m m m m m m e s s
e
bb.
/c7%
!$y
'[f fl[,f4l/p() 9
.:n,,G;gg
~5
- u. s, 1,,. WJyrl,%
.g
. /,b /
0/
I m---------=========m.g3ss4 E
.A RE SONABLE
... g u.-
COMPROMISE SOLUTION E
E
.c CONVERT E
W.?^
DIABLO CANYON E
.- +
E
^ i- (3.U.S. Nuclear Plants Have Been Converted).
.I
~
A Nuclear".Diablo is unacceptable to'me!. ' 'M 2 l
.,e
.Diablo's projected life-span of 35 years is not..
, _ g
~
j reasonable wiien donsidering the rtsks associate 4 -
I "1
witti the plant's location'(3' miles frorn'the active'
- '?$}
ljosgri Fault) nuclear' waste dispo '
roblemsiand
.tE v~
~
~
cc - Inadequate evacuation routes --
7
~
,M.
m;..
E a
< I support.the blockadsif a licens s
t.,
.,[, I y
~
s=.itGEG%Xtn -@'."dBEAtM#2E c. Ag5:7 *
' %2'~ ?<%&.. g l
^
&;.;_:,s.. :->
c
, phC2$~h. g l
l Mr. and Mrs. E. L Mayo
//) -..,
8010 Toro Creek Rd sp
<,--C l? l5 l
AtaseacDir_f.g Ca. 93[J g-
/ M '2' i"
~.-
1
~ 1yc3' a
W-T ~5 P g.f;;;;;.:r.. W s.
r
- I '. - l l
l
. P.g r
p; wSg... -t
~12c j;, i n
l og z m' y" o.stuowta USA i
..a..
~
' ~
?P t i
v l
..g.
.l
.. c f l
- -i.'c,,.s.::
I
~
JN.R.C./ x J
-l f
.c Nesclear Regulatory Commission.
[
^ ~ t717 H. Street N.W..: ' (, ', [
- )[ Db@
fl
[. ' chVastdagton, DC;10555 '- v.
-r g
r..
[lQ
. ~ >
.. w e y-s
.* 2 y *.,*
- 7 -
[W".
p.-
- . - < ?
- . s -
_el
/ -
..c.
c.
1
- Tpgir IM
- l e-68
%#7;.
r.
r.
-. ~
.magggggg
= = = m - um ammsom = = = mmims a
~
gi W 7.EENS "r;.
"q -7 g 9 22 ua Cheryl D.
Nellen gisyfd Ei_
720 Palm Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 August 4, 1981 d
Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1990 N. California Blvd.
Walnut Creek, California Gentlepeople:
Please reconsider your position regarding the Diablo Canyon nuclear reactor.
1 It is highly unlikely that the possible power generated will outweigh either the danger of unauthorized emissions and leaks, as seen by PG&E's pas practices at Humboldt Bay, or possible disaster due to earthquake, even in light of the fortifications built by PG&E, which are still inadequate.
I will be moving to San Luis Obispo with my husband shortly, and nothing published by PG&E or other pro-nuclear groups has erased my doubts and fears of disa i
V possible and probable at Diablo Canyon specifically.
S } '. J' The push to license Diablo Canyon when so-t people oppose it seems to be financial -- to keep PG&gany s
E[f happy at the risk of thousands of lives.
b*q[)
\\?
, Y'i PLEASE reconsider the position toward Diabic$(
<0
%s/
Canyon and deny licensing.
I do not wish to bring mutdn(s 4 'g, yh into the world as a result of nuclear hazards thanks to'Pt&E's
, s \\' /
i s' loppy management and reluctance in following NRC mandates. ' '5 8 LtD l
Sincerely, I
l fp
)S03 Cher 1 D. Ne en I O l
N.
-