ML20030B865
| ML20030B865 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000471 |
| Issue date: | 08/20/1981 |
| From: | Goodhope A Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | BOSTON EDISON CO., MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108250048 | |
| Download: ML20030B865 (2) | |
Text
.
W hug 21195; UNITED STA'ES OF AMERICA NUCt.EG RF3ULATORY COMMISSION e
c"/ <\\
' 'd,
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
g g i jg8{ ;, 9,.}
Before Administrative Judges:
C Andrew C. Goodhope, Chairman 2
{ E:.'.3%[ g//f Dr. A. Dixon Callihan y
Dr. Richard F. Cole q,
IU s
1 1
In the Matter of:
)
)
BOSTON EDISON COMPANY, _ET _AL_. )
)
Docket No. 50-471
)
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station,
)
'Jnit 2)
)
August 20, 198'
)
Board Ruling on Discovery On Ju ;y 24,1981 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts moved to compel Applicant (BECo) to answer its first set of interrogatories relative to emergency planning. BECo responded to the Commonwealth motion on August 4 a1d moved for a protective order.
The Board has reviewed the interrogatories, responses and filings and finds as follows.
l-Intierrogatories 3 and 4.
BECo's answers are not satisfactory and it is directed to identify any analyses of conrequences of postulated nuc ear accidents at the Pilgrim site known to BECo. Results of such studies to the extent they are in BECo's possession are to be made avail able.
Interrogatories 5 and 6.
BECo's answers a's supplemented by remarks in its August 4 motion for protective order are considered adequate by 1
this Board and absent new information no further response
($!$Uff
's dG g 1
~
0$?0$000 9Y 4
s
t 2
Interrogatory 26.
BECo is directed to make available the results of any analyses of Pilgrim area evacuation times available to it including any studies of evacuation outside the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
i Interrogatory 30.
The Board assumes that the provision of the
" errant missive" moots the issue and no further action is required.
l Interrogatory 35.
BECo is directed.to provide or make available any information in its possess' ion relating to accident notification facilities or procedures currently in use or planned for the Pilgrim site.
Interrogatcry 43.
Although the Board considers BECo's answer generally satisfactory, BECo is directed to supplement its response by making available any written responses (if there are any) which may have been received from the reviewing bodies.
Interrogatory 58.
If, in its response to this interrogatory, BECo has included all principal authors and contributors (persons making a significant input) to PSAR Amendments 40 and 41, the Board considers the I
answer complete.
If the list is not complete, BECo is directed to provide a complete list of authors and co"ntributors.
Based on the above rulings, Commonwealth's motion to compel is l
granted in part and denied in part and BECo's motion for a protective j
order is similarly disposed.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD T
4 Andrew C. Goodhope, Chairman' ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Dated at Bethesda, MD, i
this 20th day of August, 1981.
f' ~ ?
-_