ML20029C901
| ML20029C901 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1993 |
| From: | Hutchinson C ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| GNRO-94-00067, GNRO-94-67, NUDOCS 9405020351 | |
| Download: ML20029C901 (152) | |
Text
p g=
N Entsrgy opsrations,Inc.
e 3
- ENTERGY r o w se Port G bson, MS 39150 Tel 601437 2800
- i" C. R. Hutchinson I
vx e F+<sieri April 20 -1994 cx m m 1
'j ca.., anwea, sw,e U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmmission Mail Station P1-37 Washington, D.C.
20555 Attention:
Document Control Desk
Subject:
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 License No. NPF-29
.]
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 1993 GNRO-94/00067 s
P Gentlemen:
'vi -:
!{'y /
In accordance with the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Unit 1 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7, attached is the Annual' Radiological Environmental Operatina Report for the period January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1993.
Yours trul
//-
(
i CRH/SBM/ams attachment:
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report cc:
(See Next Page)
I coreno ta a t, Li U a il G9404191 j
9405020351 931231 PDR ADOCK 05000416
.i R
PDR (i
L.
y.-
April 20,1994 GNRO-94/00067 Page 2 of 3 cc:
Mr.
R. H. Bernhard (w/a)
Mr. H. W. Keiser (w/a)
Mr.
R. B. McGehee (w/a)
Mr. N.
S. Reynolds (w/a)
Mr.
H. L. Thomas (w/o)
Mr. Stewart D. Ebneter (w/a)
Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta St.,
N.W.,
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr.
P. W.
O'Connor, Project Manager (w/2)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 13H3 Washington, D.C.
20555
'k i
\\
4 i
G9404191 L.
J
-n
~n nl ly-
&. -, - ~I -
~ R, blyf j Qkf:f Q^^l....
W
~lf ' ' ~ c' jf
-7 ll i
^f [s,
hw;% -
o.
, _ '(;[.j;y p( W y[:y;.v:f.. w '.p> c c g_
y
~
.u y g y
.dy_f a u9 r
+
~
N k,'Q,y
- e 8
e bM 3:
.$ s v
.m yrs., u.. y,'
-s..u; c.
. o 33,, q i-J !.u.-
e ft.,
r,
,N-r 4
~.,
r.J
.:).:a f
c.-
i f_
V o'
s s 'm },,'3' }s y
1'
+s s
e i
1
^
y b
n n, :4.v.s
.t
' m.,
/*^\\
,: ~
}
m' g
k,i W
k,.'^
g 1
-.3/
)
T Lf, l4., p
{, p l, \\.->l' wy v i, t
4
. t-r - h_p,\\
g nr 4 4 r
.bj
,4 e.
s 4
g 4
(
i*
,h-b f
%I g
w.d
.f.
') ^
A 5l
.}
f J
4
. +
s 1
v
,Q3,_
.k.'.,I j
5.
I a
g y
f f
J i
em g
yi n
t I
J O
y w s
,4 4
,3
' f,u J's.
$ yE ',
>"nr
.b.
' *.,'g
.c,.
'l,'-
4 4
[~M.,. '.' }
j 'A. 3,
' ' >!.j,, '.
v J.
g.
v s
"> 1.,
3, #
.T_'.-
y' 4
p
.e.b g
t
- m 1F 3
L 3
..r d
E 4
' {' l t
. k.
?
J.
>+
q 7
m.w a
>.>e c
,)
g.p s
I jt-,t
.m w
L ~ 'u,h, G.
u
,y a,v m
fp 4
n.d W
- Y:
y j) d.
w
...t 7 s.,.r { 'i
- ( $' ;j 'j?
L
+
w N,aJ
...a..
w
, y;j GRAN.D GULF. NUCTIAR,)STATIONw uW N+
j - -.,
Q. ': -
y
,y,
-~::,.y
-- ^,- ' %._i Q. a u 1-is 4
>1993[ANNUALiRADIOLOGICAli ENVIRONMENTA OPERATING 5RIPORT N.
w my B:::w, >; w,,,.3
,g_
s u.-
N.s yr
< c.
h.
3 s
r
}%
Qf t
r,., V -n a
b i
si i
.,a v;
>le '
i A
?j k
rf.N 9lp g p
/
g 1
y'%,
, y:s ;,
4' j w 4
( Fi :.
f' f :]^;
s s j
(
C:, ;i, A
r.
3
- f,w y
"v-8.
4 t;
{y;
. ' - Q t'
s g<..
l 5.\\
- }
l ' ':
o
\\'
)
1 s
d'
Nf \\ }
4 3
n.,.
j^
t s
!'}>-
C.
,4
,p:
r.
- .9.j.7
< w,,
h, a 1
, s-a.:'.
y
- s
',; { { 4 r.,i
, ' ?.,V.s '
1
a Q,. 3[
fr g
v w
, f '.-1
~
2y I
'f a ~
4 w
u} C.~-
h'.-:- s a~.,
.,.. ::[ i-6
- 4. ^:-
y ::%
t s
~
4'/g j f, r
- s 1
i
/c
!s
,?
g,$
4 1 ;.,.
.',u y x1 u
^
s'_
s s
f',,'_',
3t
. vI
..t
'>.h.',.
..\\~<
~_Z
- 4. ( n c
3 n
J y
f G
J' i
'e S
.'. v4 s,S>.
'i k.4 4
) M {-
x' x l
I
,;,3
/
f.)
J t
< s y
.+
5 4
-i.
- wn
.I p-g
'y 1
14,;, t 1
I i
i r
3 r
3
~-; a
,l' l..
1
(
,. i
...,iP"'
~
c 9
J
.d U
> > e i
t
'f 1
.S f.,., c,f,:h 4
L a
.t s
v
\\
o I
}
.p V'7. p,{
5[ *'
s
.+,
' L
._,._,1 i '
. f. i.
! M.
[', Y h 3
y
)
}'.((
(
..,i,"'
p
(
Ir.-^-
v r-
- .y y
'h' N
n+
en 5
l
.q
\\
J V
,r,;
. I y
JY g
k' b
!\\.s s
(
3 y
,d, _e'
. T, p n',
f
[
g y
g i
l'
('
[
g I
(
C k'[ ';
-v' f
XL 221 u_.O f l -- _ _.22n kl. L. l'?_.'
W' A' ' ^,
c'. g > "
4
,.,g
.i _ -..
r' A~~'
- c. r '
h;U
....,.s.e.1
'~
A
i Summary H
The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) -
presents Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (GGNS) Environmental C.urveillance Program (ESP) data obtained through analyses of environmental samples collected for the period January 1,1993 through December 31,1993. The AREOR fulfills the requirements of GGNS Technical Specifications 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7.
During 1993 and as in previous years, GGNS detected radionuclides attributable to plant operations in the discharge basin surface water (Tritium),
barge slip sediment (Manganese-54, Iron-59, Cobalt-58, Cobalt-60, Chromium-51 and Cesium-137) and sewage sludge (Manganese-54, 1
Cobalt-60 and Cesium-137). GGNS personnel routinely monitor results from these areas to note any trends. Their 1993 review of these areas over previous years indicates the following:
! Tritium levels are increasing in the discharge basin surface water.
However, es a comparison,' levels detected are well below the.
' technical s' pecification reporting level of 20,000 pCi/l for drinking l water.
Radionuclides in the barge slip sediment appear to be stabilizing as compared to previous years.
Radionuclides in the sewage sludge remain at levels similar to those -
of previous years.
Section 2.0 of this report provides a discussion of these results.
k Environmental Surveillance Program GGNS established the ESP in 1978 before the station became operational (1985) to provide data on background radiation and radioactivity normally present ii
]
en-in the area. GGNS has continued to monitor the environment by sampling air, milk, water, vegetation, sediment and fish, as well as measuring radiation directly.
The ESP includes sampling indicator and control locations within an 18-mile radius of the plant. The ESP utilizes indicator locations near the site to show any increases or buildup of radioactivity that might occur due to station operation, and control locations farther away from the site to indicate the presence of only naturally occurring radioactivity. GGNS personnel compare indicator results with control and preoperational results to assess any impact GGNS operation might have had on the surrounding environment.
In 1993, GGNS personnel collected 1,340 environmental samples and had them analyzed for radioactivity. They compared results ofindicator locations with
\\
control locations and previous studies, and concluded that no signi6 cant relationship exists between GGNS operation and effect on the plant environs.
Their review of 1993 data, in many cases, showed undetectable radiation levels in the environment and near background levels in significant pathways associated with GGNS. Therefore, they concluded that GGNS operation has had no harmful-effects or irreversible damage to the environment.
Attachments Attachment I contains results of air, milk, water, vegetation, sediment and fish samples collected in 1993 and analyzed by Entergy Services, Inc., (ESI)
System Chemistry Section. It also includes ESI Systern Chemistry's results in the Environment i Protection Agency (EPA)Interlaboratory Comparison Program.
Attachment II contains results of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) collected in 1993 and analyzed by Waterford-3's Dosimetry Section.
1 Iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
_Paya Summary.
ii List of Tables.
vii List of Figures....
viii List of Attachments..
ix Section Tonic 1.0 Introduction.........
1.i 1.1 Radiation.'......
11 1.2 Benefits ofRadiation..
1-1 1.3 -
Safety of' Radiation........
12 1.4 Environmental Surveillance Program Purpose and Design Criteria,...................
'l.2 1.5 Dose Pathways Associated with
~ G G N S...........
13 1.6
' Pathways Monitored....
' l.3 -
1.7 Previous Data Comparison..........
14 2.0 Environmental Surveillance Program.....
2-i
~i
{
2.1 Air Particulates and Radioiodines.....
21 2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry..
25 1
1 2.3 Milk.
2 11 l
l 2.4 Water..
2-13 iV a
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Tonic Eag 2.5 Vegetation...
2-17 2.6 Sediment......
2-19 2.7 Fish...
2-23 2.8 Special Samples..
2..
2.9 Annual Land Use Census.........
2-27 3.0 Analytical Program Technical Description.
3-i 3.1
. Sample Handling and Treatment..
3-1 3.2 Gross Beta Air Sample Analysis.....
3-2 3.3.
Gross Beta Water Sample Analysis....
3-2 3.4 Tritium Water Sample Analysis.................
32 3.5 -
Iodine-131 Sample Analysis......
3-3 3.6' Gamma Isotopic Sample Analysis.
3-3
' 3.7 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry.....
3-5 3.8 Data Reporting Conventions..............
3-5 4.0 Environmental Surveillance Program Summary.
' 4-i I
4.1 -
1993 Program Results Summary.
'4-1 5.0 Quality Control Data.
5-i 5.1 Cosscheck Program Results.
5-1 5.2 Duplicate Samples..
5-1 i
V 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Tonic
_Pa_ge 6.0 1993 Sampling and Analytical Results..
6.i 6.1 1993 Data.
6-1 6.2 Lower Limit ofDetection.
61 6.3 Reporting Levels....
6-1 6.4 Sampling Deviations.
...... 6-1 6.5 Radioactivity Not-Attributable to GGNS :....
6-2 6.6 Sampling Relocation.......................
62-6.7 Comparison to Federal and State Programs.....
6-3~
6.8 Unavailable Results.
6-3 6.9 Harmful Effects or Ineversible Damage..
.. 6-3 l
l h@
M.6
.MMN
.M.
M l
LIST OF TABLES e
Table No.
Title
.P._a ge 11 Radiation Risks............
1-5 1-2 Air Sample Locations...
.1-6 1-3 TLD Locations..
1-7 1-4 Milk and Water Locations..
1 12 15 Vegetation, S'ediment and Fish Locations.
1-14 2-1 Average TLD Do'se Rates........
2-8 '-
2-2 Barge Slip Sediment Analytical Summary........... 2-22 23 19921993 Land Use Census Changes...
-.2-3 0 2-4 1993 Land Use Census..
2-31 4 1-Emironmental Monitoring Program Summary.........
4-2 4-2 Indicator & Control Locations..........
. 4-9 i
1
]
Vii
LIST OF FIGURES Ficure No.
Title
_P_gge 1-1 Exposure Pathways..............
'l-16 1 -2.
Sample Collection Sites - 5 Mile Map.............1 17 1-3 Sample Collection Sites.10 Mile Map........
1-18 2-1 Air Sample Cross Beta Concentrations.
2-4 2-2 TLD Radiation Dose.
.~2 10 2-4 Discharge Basin Tritium Results....
2-16 5-1 EPA Intercomparison Study...................
.........._5-2 i
i l
1 l
+
l 1
viii
LIST OF ATTACRMENTS Attachment Title Pa2e I
1993 Environmental Sampling and Analytical Report...
I.i
~ II 1993 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Report..... II.i 1
l IX L
=
sggMR#pMWWesspgg m
mm ew
.m@w. am%u +emy:,'w;.ww-lam m m e m -@w.w*m -@an.m,Agh _M~%,
ah pa v
b s me m
mm.a Mn,w~.ay g~ n% : m y mne w.. w ce"2;
- mM r~
w ww n:m%:M[ tnt.}QQ'4fMypg.ngAW s; 4 *";-w'.';yC,dy"d GigM %:n, ' S 4. f um3 M*giikkk w
u mM C h'i>
r.a
T t A f '"
M n
gn n y >
%+
J wi
~a %
x gy
,Wlf.D*r%w;WQJ7.h a@h E J;pe w 'p Q h W f@ '}w;ja M
Vf t'q
,u w
4s WnM We *
/, :A 9 s M:
r y
g w m.Ng 1
% D;.
!P 2
+5 fW v m as m
$e.,Q f' f @ Q y' Q.Q' y.'Mm /:sgo v
,wy/:M 'v m%pw/6ty p.w dr d e
/
4e a a+mu-nm QQ lg l M g '
Q Q Q g Q $ $ Q Q[ e. Q; ?jQ Ib
+
N N
J Q
-M.l
&w!g%
f 3
w o
m % m #s ~:w w m x an w
am#
x
_w n ; gg,.wp; #'myqq% q;f~ 4 ga$$m$&w&r$a$$m?U$&ng gQ.;;m e
am m
n a p
my +
.~
yy gg,2.wa Au y.
g y E.ngg s
@, ej$ng:@
?%
W,h f
Ef Y
e
&g.a?
?
- W*
Gi
%. wm m
. s 'o w %fp n m ygy:m%w,a,p:;pvQ.gg:v.
1
&g;,p q, m
- c. m a
s?u
- n. ?
fu
,w,.
,'. :mp u
4, wMQpg s
h;.QQf j@shyyg u.gufyl)+ y,M
..,% s%. p.,&MM.WM W*4>
,P 44%
', u W.
s y
nc w r.
v
,T g;.3
% ~
en w
^
NWDD @4%M%MQy V 9dk
- QQf,,
a
~^
.A.Q
_ >gg M,
ggg;w og 4 g g g4:
m ;mm. M Q. a s:
g 9-s
+.<
g,
?s w+.g:N pg 4 sq.pn>gq?:p.&um&gm w M, Q
^p ac
<~
a &- f3 w g
e y:g.m, 7y gqW q..
v eg syn.:m Nc n
ww:qw ffk 3+ qU #~ h ; w% ~ p s %m[ $ +u. k 2
w Nh Wh %
9 M,,
(:i wxy 5 V,:
g p dig -
a a
y[#
,,;jg -
g%n,z y%
w yp g y;;Mym.wK M%g@Mm%
Q z:c mSyyQeegup<&
^
4)>'
pm wewaa( myc gym :t 8m s s
+
vggr ulr p ur ya. wn:;&ls.s+ge)m:nwSg > n =ypm pgf. &;
7S my a
q yh; R
n-M.g
-M, y pam' eu 44g u
ge c.<v.mm.pw w, mgmmk wxxm+p,,t pm;3pm. 54..m s
,g y s
q? ~ '
m +msn,
u y
.a nr.n m g w
,s aQ.
. eg m
a m
..g^
[:
9
[
p$
m o m m u.pyp pa:y.pg' A mm:;y y um amme mg a&
y;m; ;.
pp m
w,a eg y/ -
he wn.
, vp 69
.-,. 4{ g{mgy y
v.
t Mi!.h: s p. ly. v. j Wy,'-
,:W.
s + 9 TM gi(m.m'gy
. e s.y 3 ya,
.,,,v.
rr g
g.
q r
4 A
g
.g.
'W,,l I
_, f h
E W
@s@4%y+
WMAMaW @+MM%g c.ECTI.ON.T.07 %s a JS u
gm v ww
,", v. c,p
%p%
C[n s J> MMDb M,'4. ;..g&pp
W iV d wneuf.pd g.w m s.
1 g.,...
a
.m.
m c, c. e,,
ua
, - 37
, %2 w a w,gy.,,g.,,o.o 7 y
fi yi-gj p.
MINTRODUCTIONMdW,@q,WW@mym%g n.
, wa m.
n u.
awwga QW MMM a
& z : ' W @gW%
gyggyQ
{ g +g g g
y 4
( g.g
.jj'
- 4.s l ggg gpgy., Ag;p m-
,v :
g so' % ~ ~n v#~*g gg$g%gh&q$g; ggg QMky Jg
> m :ug ua assag w
MQ bn A
R m v~. w m b p gm wy' w 9.. g4.,;;3g 4y gg s
, a
~- g g y+ ggy w~ n ~
Wih g $ bM Q,enjhgQgegyg;w m.g e
p;;3,..
,yg y
un 3
v A.m 4.pt.
gf ggg s
.,, # g.gp,jy e
m 4
1 y
-QW NjM rs n Lg @3t e A py 'a@g[p;%)pgf 13 pg g@
p y/g 7 /'
hgggkq p
g e
y,
> ~'
, t p' ; i KWhm m*$
1Ap 4 ges x q.y' 3,,JQ&. Q~ Qf. y QQ,g +g,f,( p; u.,)ww ?. Nw~.;p y!gQa v. g o.m% a4 ,w ipn ' (> jf.e-6, g% Q. n r MEW & n:},mg Q) (Q41.l[7 gf.2 .adky4;& n Qdf g,g j g g ;p p g-e p s',,Mce"% W < 6 $f V6 ?RY r ggs ? pg ggwgapa y , m p,,c, y .p w L w a , a,4 mg m,.m
- gmys.nps%%myJ
s 99w meagwn ~- L ,4 4, wa n.w ny wn g wgeg%M ,c w ntwm ~m< wm ugyan k n. Wa w:; cw a
- o. w m ew w,jg.,(nn'Af%fQqyfmy qQ. w ayggy ~
' l9 ffy rgg .w
- M '
+ v+nmn-ww w e.gn %y wuw<e@.-g ~ e g n.
- w md m.m m,
a r m, a q., e p.~ au t x c.q g,9q p .9 m 3; h p:..%w. w..uq,m: , 4 ' %gp fq w. w 9 WM
- wq e - mas a a (Mg u g fpy 7
Yl }: h f + .h r
- q~p p ps/_y + ggy m> w, n,, u,TQg,QW s #wR'Q>*k&'
GA y yg ~ wd E 'Mg % n? ~ ~. A
- 9 d
- f 3
B RX ha 4 p.
- i r
M
- D w:
h6 &;(t': Qd q f 1 > yp. + 4:p M2h>ppbuM W. ' ;:ag g-g yc 4 -. n% 1 6 s. m:g P 7 ~- ,e q w, g g,p gwpgg
- 4yqp, v.
1 i x.s ', ;.ph. .~g a%m 9> n 99 9~445m .,,.-o m e g.gyj g, pqx %w:yy%;q;c%pgW j yg:L_ y%g m nm W,. s. g: 7 je.g r ~ _y ,x ' + ,ar . m:yyt; QQ yy r q 3; m. ,gp %am..pTM. w @4p}h;. G pk w' nn.di:de 4 dg,:y, Q j ft d cf f N ?f.E D.f,jfQt.MO' lp ', [d @?. %@%yf*: "y Y- {, $_ !-y; ,..(,y, \\ c. t V ,4:l W'ai .,.,M. j f ?$,s.. TN
- n$ p % h.m'Ny %h _ m 4
- f Q m
b woM %n%sy@% i %jg,W - sa; ,4j{m.yJVs y g[a / n ~
- y--
jj f %Qy3 -T% p c
- . w :x p, 1'
i' ' gg-a my4 w e r= wm 7% d]a%w,p p%MMQ: gg#j@W% n,m n s u 4/n g aqq d m:: m,' e,v .~ w~u jp% spa WM nma p @pp%gy 4 s - ' jp,. L e g g g g y; a. w w;%g & % pp QM f;. 1 -m x,gg 3 Q g >p* a , 9:, ~ u sp s, a.f. Ep.h--:,m., $ m.;.w a,i s- + w .,,. ' h a. f. c - j ' "' f:Q' f$4We d9 y'/.pG .u w}' z, ^: tyr ey-yMm,W ny Q J;[ s a; W %[jh@ypn L sG, r7<[ be $ b NhMf e
- h #
/J 'l,1: a
- 3.& 44 m, s n
9g: g.qp y;gg w r v.u . + 1 s s, f_ (%g ~ ' 3:c: rnig: 5 l _ n:sp yn gy g '1 MN s UM(;l NN %pc ' W hN$h; c1, 9m6cn@w, y-f
- o. g g%g g,3 S p W W a
jp p gggg w1 - c ^ nx . u,,m,:,,,,, r 4 > m w _m, w,n s x, w
Introduction 1.1 Radiation Natural radiation affects all people. Natural radiation exposure comes from the sun, naturally occurring radioactive materials present in the earth, dwelling structures, food and water, air and our bodies. Levels of natural or background radiation vary greatly from location to location. For example, the average United States resident receives approximately I 300 millirem in a year from natural background as shown in Table 1-1. Man-made sources, including X-rays, radiation medical treatment, fallout from nuclear explosives testing, and radioactive materials from f nuclear power plants, contribute additional exposure. However, Table 1-1 shows that an individual receives the major portion of dose from natural background and other sources, with nuclear power plants contributing < 1.0 millirem. 1.2 Benefits of Radiation Uranium used in nuclear power p'ays an important part in meeting 3 today's electricity needs, and it will continue to serve as an important source of energy well into the future. Also, other uses for radiation have f benefited our everyday lives during the past 20 or 30 years. Industries use radioisotopes and controlled radiation to sterilize medical supplies, to improve food preservation, in industrial processes, in medical science, and in the study of environmental pollution, agriculture and hydrology. The public receives its main exposure to man-made radiation from medical - 1 diagnosis and treatment sources, but the benefit in terms of human lives and health is enormous. 1-1 L
1.3 Safety of Radiation Radiation and the safety of radiation cornmand considerable public attention. Although it is not generally realized, safety regulations for radioactive materials are much stricter than for other potentially dangerous substances. For example, a person living near a 1000 megawatt electrical (MWe) coal fired plant could receive 7.2 millirem in a year frem the - i naturally occurring radioactive materials contained in the coal that is burnt. A person living adjacent to a similar sized nuclear plant could expect to receive < 1.0 millirem in a year. In addition, radioactive elements lose their radioactivity, and I resulting toxicity with time. Potentially toxic non-radioactive materials, such as lead, silver and mercury, can remain to be a problem until properly treated and stabilized. Table 1-1 presents illustrations of relative radiation exposure risks as compared to other health risks. 1.4 Environmental Surveillance Program Purnose and Desien Criteria GGNS established the ESP to minimize any associated radiation-l endangerment to human health or the environment by ensuring that plant operating controls function properly. The ESP purnose involves: Evaluating environmental sampling procedures, equipment and techniques Measuring radiation levels and their variations in environmental. + media in the area surrounding the plant J Determining average levels of radiation and radioactive material in e various environmental media Detecting effects, if any, of GGNS operation on the environmental radiation levels and concentrations. 1-2 1
The ESP design criteria includes: Analyzing important pathways for anticipated types and quantities of radionuclides released into the environment Considering the possibility of a buildup oflong-lived radionuclides in the environment and identifying physical and biological accumulations that may contribute to human exposures Considering the potential radiation exposure to plant and animal life in the environment surrounding GGNS Correlating levels of radiation and radioactivity in the environment with radioactive releases from station operation. 1.5 Dose Pathways Associated with GGNS Figure 1-1 shows potential exposure pathways that could occur as a result of a nuclear power plant. However, direct dose from gaseous effluent and thyroid dose from ingesting milk involves the most significant environmental dose pathways from a nuclear power station. GGNS f operations have little, if any, impact on these pathways due to very low levels of radiation released, remote location and absence of milking animals i within five miles of GGNS. In addition, the GGNS Final Environmental Report lists the first use of drinking watec from the Mississippi River as j more than 200 miles downstream. Therefore, GGN3 operations have little, if any, impact on this pathway. 1.6 Pathways Monitored The ESP includes the sampling program for monitoring airborne, waterborne, ingestion and direct radiation pathways as required by the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Specifications. GGNS u i 1-3 .] i i = i ~~^ '
I' I supplements this program with additional sampling in order to provide a comprehensive and well-balanced program. Tables 1-2 through 1-5 provide a description of the GONS ESP sample locations. Only sample locations required by ODCM Specifications are keyed to Figures 1-2 and 1-3 as shown in the Tables. I.7 Previous Data Comparison GGNS personnel observed no significant changes between 1993 results and those from previous years. Results remained at levels similar to those of previous years. Such results confirm proper functioning of GGNS effluent controls and equipment. / (
-TABLE 11 Radiation Risks. Radiation Risks In Perspective Estirnsted Loss of Average Life Expectancy From Various Health Risks c ' Radiation Dose Comparisons Estimated Days Aeproximata - cf Life Expectancy +: lAREM/ Year. Mestth Risk. ~ Lost (average) . Natural Background - Average U.S. Resident......... .300 . Smcking 20 Cigareties/ Day ~... . 2370(a.sg Average Denver Res! dent..........380. Overweighterzw........... 985 ruren; Radon in average households All Accidents Combined : ' 35 p.: ven; + New York /Now Jersey..... -360 ... 475 . Auto Accidents.......... .. 200' Massachuset1............. Atcohol Consumption (v.s. Avnge). 130 Medical Exposure ..... 50 Home Accidents ' 95 Average U.S. Citizen........... Typical Medical Examinaton D mwnbg -------..-- ------.--,M Dental X. Rays (Mwun....... ~... -. 3,000 (sxn -8 ChestX. Rays. ........ ~..... ~10 (sm,; Natural Background Radiation.._. Gastro-intestinal Ser!es runw4 aw o.. .~1,400(s#4 Medical Diagnostic X Rays ru.s. Avnge).... 6 Occupational Exposure All Catastrophes (sanneuexe, mm.) .... 3.5 Average Piigrim Station .600 ese., One REM Radiation.......... 1 Radiation Worker wm,sso;...... Background Radiation Sources Radon 55% ,C.jnm gt..g k, w..-$dMhD %*I- w a. ;m. p G@\\. m. 3...Mgh ( g y .a u m g "gy m y ycy. N $g: 3.; 7y.. : i.,.e p j o j $ ;y'%. Q { u; .::. ~ iff' s t -.. Ccsmic 8% fq;p IIJ[M;$. gM: '..... 1 ": ;.. >$$;p$ D Terrestria! 8% / +--- Nuclear Medicine 4% ,.. a 4.- R. yv. 9 q w & h g,. cg ; y. 3.<.d.~ ' " p.. + Consarner Products 3% Intemal 11% >g ..-j -+ 0:ner <1% w wp.. f.. -glm,p MA Occupaiiona10.3% Q > ED8h: %Q.b.,;.?d7D 5 S ? ? i. 4 Fallout 0.3% Medica' X-Rays 11% $5MW%Wb ' QV .) Nuclear Fue! O.1% ~' %,p~n +a Cr* -i Miscenaneous 0.1% y 7 as. 5 Tne per:antage contribution of var!cus radhtian sour:ss to the totalaverage eMa:ilye dose squ! vale O e 30 1-5
TABLE 12 f - Air Sample Locations Air Sample Number - Figure Location AS-1 PG 13 - Southeast of GGNS at the Pon Gibson City Barn (Sector G, Radius 5.5 miles) AS-3 61VA 1-3 North-northeast of GGNS on Hwy 61, nonh of the Vicksburg Ahport (Sector B, Racus 18 miles) AS-4 GJOE Not - Southwest ofGGNS, Glodjo propeny on Shown Bald Hill Road (-Sector L, Radius 0.9 miles) - AS.5 TC Not South of GGNS behind the Support Services Shown-Center (Sector J, Radius 0.4 miles) l AS-6 RS 12 Northeast of GGNS, south side of Grand Gulf Road (Sector C,' Radius 0.5_ miles)- AS.7 MT. 12 Nonh o' f G' GNS, locatedInext to the. Meteorological Tower - (Sector A, Radius 0.8 miles). l AS-8 WR 12 East of GGNS, located at former site of Maggie Jackson's trailer on Bald Hill Road near the eastern SITE BOUNDARY (Sector E, Radius 0.6 miles) AS-10 HR Not Near County Road / Heavy Haul Road Shown intersection (Sector P, Radius 0.8 miles) j AS-11 BB Not Near influent end of Basin B (Sector M, l I Shown Radius 0.3 miles) M. MMN.. M O O 16 l-
) . TABLE 1-3 - TLD Locations t . TLD No. . Location Figure Sector Mile M-00 Maintained in lead shield during the exposure period M Across the road from the - Lake Claiborne entry gate 1-2 E' 3.5 M-07 Port Gibson City Barn, AS-1 1-3 G. 5.5 M-09 Warner Tully Camp 1-2 D 3.5 M-10 Grand GulfMilitary Park l-2 A 1.5 - M-14 Hwy 6_l, AS-3-61VA, north (Control) ofVicksburg Airport 1-3 .B 18.0 M-16 AS-7 MT, Meteorological. Tower 1-2' A 0.8 M-17 AS-6-RS, Grand GulfRoad. 1-2 'C 0.5 . M-19 Behind burn pit on fence at eastern SITE BOUNDARY 1-2 E. . 0.5 .:M-20 Hazardous Waste Storage Area - 1 F~ ~ 0.5 I . M-21 AS-5-TC, Support Services Center 1-2 J . 0.4 M-22 Former RR entrance crossing 12 G 0.5 M-23 County Road / Heavy Haul Road 50 yards north on power pole 1-2 Q 0.5 M-25 Radial Well Number 1 12 N 1.6 1-7 i
3 TABLE 1-3 - TLD Locations - TLD No. ' Location : Figure Sector Mile - M-27 _ South point SITE BOUNDARY, 200 yards along propertyline 11-2 M 1.5 1 M-28 ' AS-4 GJOE, Glodjo residence : 1-2 L-0.9 i M-31 Duplicate TLD installed quarterly at varying locations -M-32 Duplicate TLD installed. quarterly at varying locations M-33, Newellton, Louisiana, Water Tower ' 1-3. JP 12.5 - M-36 Curve on 608, point nearest i GGNS at power pole - 1-2 P. '5.0'
- . M-38
' Lake Bruin Statj Park, ' l second pole- ~1-3 : M. 9.5 : M-39 St. Joseph,' Louisiana, Aux.- Water Tank .1-3 M-l13.0 M-40 International Paper Road, 5 miles from site 1-2 M ' 5.0 M-41 Radial WellNumber 4 1-2 P 1.5 f M-45 Old Visitor Ce' ter gate. 2 D 0.5 n } M-47 Bridge 0.6 miles west of Rodney Westside Road / Mont Gomer Road intersection, north side 1-3 L 5.2 1-8 t
TABLE 1-3 ' TLD Locations TLD No. Location ' Figure Sector Mile M-48 Property line fence 0.4 miles on Mont Gomer Road on West side 1-2 K 4.8 j M-49 Fork in Weathers Road 1-2 H ..4.5 ' l-50 Panola Hunting Club entrance 1-3 B 5.5 ' M-51 Ingelside/ Deer Ctenp Road intersection 1-2 C. 4.2. M-55 Behind Bonner's Beauty Shop at MSDH air sampler 1-2 D 5.0 .M-56 A.W. Watson Elementary and Junior High School 1-2 G-4.2 M-57 Hwy 61, behind the Welcome to Port Gibson sign at Glensdale - Subdivision ~ 1-2 .F 4.5 M-58 Hwy 61, Big Bayou Pierre bridge, southeast end 1-2 E 5.0 M-59 Offlevee at Wm' ter Quarters Hunting camp 1-3 N~ 5.1 M-60 Duplicate TLD installed quarterly at varying locations M-61 Protected area fence Not D Onsite Shown M-62 Protected area fence Not E Onsite Shown 1-9
e TABLE 13 TLD Locations TLD No. . Location - Figure . Sector Mile [. M.63 Protected area fence .Not N Onsite Shown M-64 Protected area fence Not; M Onsite Shown M-65 Protected area fence Not ' 'L Onsite Shown - M-66 Protected area fence Not - K Onsite. Shown f M-67 Protected area fence Not J Onsite l Shown - M.68 Protected area fence - Not - H-Onsite - Shown. f M-69 Protected area fence Not ; G - Onsite Shown L M.70 Protected area fence Not. F Onsite Shown M-71 Protected area fence Not C Onsite - Shown 'M.72 Protected area fence Not B Onsite Shown M-74 Protected area fence Not P Onsite Shown I. 1 M.76 Protected area fence Not A Onsite - Shown i I 1-10 i
TABLE 1-3 TLD Locations l TLD No. Location Ficure Sector Mile M-77 Protected area fence ' Not R-Unsite 'Shown M-81 Administration Building Not .Q Onsite Shown M-86 Bechtel gate north-SITE BOUNDARY 12-B _ 0.5 M-88 ' River mile marker 409.5 1-2 A ~.2 4 M Middle Grou$dIsland
- 1 2 RT 4.4 '
M-90 Across from Middle Ground Island ~ 12-Q 3.5 M-91 Transmission line by pond . l.2 J 4.5 M-92 ' Fence behind orchard '- 1 K: ' O.4 M-93 Underground cable sign 12 H' O.4 - M-93 Sector R garden 1-2 R 0.8 l 1-11 I
TABLE 1-4 Milk and Water Locations Milk Figure ' Location Alcorn State University 1-3 Located south-southwest of GGNS (Sector K, Radius [ 10.5 miles) I f Cistern Water f McGee Cistern 1-2 Located north ofGGNS at l the McGee house (Sector A, p Radius 0.9 miles) - ) Willis Cistern 1-3 Located at the C E. Willis }. house east-northeast of GGNS across from the Shiloh Baptist Church'(Sector D, l . Radius 6.0 miles).. Surface Water . Upstream 1-2 4500 ft upstream of the GGNS discharge point into . the Mississippi River to allow - adequate mixing of the Mississippi and Big Black Rivers (Sector Q-R,1.8 miles) Downstream 1-2 5000 ft downstream of the GGNS discharge point into the Mississippi River near Radial Well No.1 (Sector N,1.6 miles) ~ r. I Discharge Basin 1-2 West-northwest of GGNS in parking lot (Sector P,0.3 miles) 1-12 ]
.~, f TABLE 1-4 Milk and Water Locations Groundwater Figure '- .' Location PGWELL l ' PORT GIBSON WELLS - . Taken from distribution' system or.one of the five wells (Sector G, Radius 5.0 miles). ~ AAWELL l-2 Arnold Acres Trailer Park, inactive (Sector J, Radius. 1.1 miles) i i 'f P -i 5 1 4 1-13 .i t
[ l TABLE 15 Vecetation Sediment and Fish Locations Vegetation Figure . Location BroadleafVegetation 1-2 South of GGNS near the Support Services Center (Sector J,0.4 miles) 1-2 North-northwest ofGGNS near the Meteorological Tower (Sector R,0.8 miles) 13 Alcorn State University south-southwest of GGNS (Sector K,10.5 miles) when f available, otherwise a location: 15-30 km distant Sediment SEDHAM 12 - Downstream of the GGNS discharge point into the Mississippi River in the vicinity of the boat landing l near Hamilton Lake outfall I (Sector N,2.0 miles) SEDBAR Not Barge slip (Sector Q,1.5 Shown miles) I SEDCONT Not Upstream from the GGNS Shown discharge point into the Mississippi Riverin the f vicinity ofupper Grand Gulf Landing (Sector R,2.0 miles) f 1-14
~ TABLE 15 - Vecetation, Sediment and Fish Locations Fish Figlig Location i Commercially or. 1-2 Downstream of the GGNS recreationally discharge point into the important Mississippi River species 12 Upstream of the GGNS discharge point into the Mississippi River uninfluenced by the plant operations - l 1 l ( .M. 1-15 i
j iFI.G R.E Mil. .x, - + a.1 ' > mftfoogore Nf$lkhys; l + e a g.; g' g '-.g.;y p;. %.a x ^ .n:s + n 4- ,:e:p < q:43 gs. 5 ri 2E'; y;;:
- ^
y. x s s m.. 4 '6 D' ,p ' f5 ibi r sy;; i Y 4 .l,.gg y ~'}~- s m-g, s +uy .gg--
- a
- ..
? s - me:.- ' ~..ep, b s. s s ..,q gy;
- )..
OW-: { 4 A x j i {Lt!Nt5 LI@l0 EfftMNT$ l l l <> s-y _ q,s. \\_ 4 .g I s 09 4 y Direct, ( J_ Irradistf ort - p xe. S ,1 s 4 \\ K 3 d E W,s y s , Transport of g Fuel and Waste s i ~ d;s
- l pot,Qot,frfedI8I IO 2
s w I e ~ x (p$ gpg. PIC4I ..O N h s I ^ N W esto, ea 1 dp r.c <f \\ ; ~ ,r pistn9) V*g*y G&@@.eca 3 ^ @.J D $ 2L @ % 7 b h 0l3 E a ~ g fy g s [ [4 Consumptica ,1M M, ' fik) S s s wa-Lv _-w_
- __g, m
IM y e $ t l C fl p T *h
- ~
6 D ~ .r,[,- 4 54; s e 3 r 4 - f !. x 'gt
- T i'
- .h'
'y'_ r' 2 .. I ..........L... L; ,w ...- ~...... .1.16 ::- ~ l 1 i
FIGURE 12 Samole Collection Sites - 5 Mile Man 4 R A ' B' ~ ira < C Q Q an e A caw.we., O s<*. a.. i {li4 6l' 3
- Ij i A s,eme new,'
6e , /' 4 g e. t 1 I I .\\ \\", %g fh* es~ ca. n lh g Il A o= f ., an,,, .g ~ 4 was /. p s e, ~
- c..-
s (ELs, .'A Q:w g s p g 'A N y r g c o. m w,. o g
- o i
,,s 0 y ue .gre W }... _..,,. t na d.: yn .A ,N,-3r. s _f sg* ~- y,~ se sa hl QJ .p- &. LWl..e. $L. o. k O' h E b .:,;n ct .N[ r u. %e. o = .+' o>U-r. 's -~ cw; p@
- p'l
-- 4-2 p' ~ >4: e\\o + . s .s i p, c -w -f C N "i }f' ,'N %.%,m ss f ,_^" 'm w _.., g.< ~g. ~~+ .~..T .e i .n. .c r.. g ~ j-j..;& 2%~ jlSTO Nl,y, 3 1, f., .~- ..g ~ g\\j jg. - la :. w. 'S - Q,' y ' A.,. \\" 1-NN l's . i. \\ ? 3 .E& s ~sy" . f, ' _ y f n r- .I ! s. f-g s = M _ _. + , r. qge .3, _ 44 , a
- l' Aa I:
,s. ,.,- e. .+ ( 4 1l 9 A wc g A ' e-y l. ,ll N ~ k I ;' g[* g I V /, [ g / ,,/ r h j, s SAAND MF IItJCLEMt STAT 006 ,5 ,[rrr b,,, S Mlle taveeemental / i-vi e ve i saa*6. missa j-m,___ w = M.. L. rmvr ~ "'a Q / f\\ P t -.+.- l.17 e
FIGURE 13 Samnle Collection Sites - 10 Mile Man .,.'l I i e~ ,a..u.. AIRPOR1 s3 l / 1 l 18 MILE 5 700m GaAND GULF 70 VICK5 BURG AltP0ft -Q \\- R A B G u-No Q = n=== ac O s.= w.= ,ogmqoop oV ly 0 N a \\. o, o 1 a ~ r y 1 '. ~ o n. .n,,,, 2 s f - -, ~. r + s p . j ~,. O gg0N '? s e . - ~ -..
- e g= ~
~.
- a
#~ .. n y -..? s e v ._t , a( p .^G-y = . y .,,n.. .s, .m..., 'd,. ' C. # .\\ ~, - = E ~- 7 N - d- - g +,, .a = i. n.,. r, /y , ~~ ,"k 1.
- c A
} -g- .,5, 30 -_r
- 5.T.
_,.:gxw; .~ ,; w.. .r. .~. c = w5
- 4
- g' ** g 'e r, t 8 -" ',. j s, { }, -W { c~v T @m. - g%+.$. 4 r M + . ~ 4 2,
- 2.... <
i g 9 s.e.-- s G s 4,, a f, I ORAND SULF NUCLt.AA station r~ y g ,,g ' f em h.3,.M,., 10 Mlle EMronmenial ] Samoing Lesden Map =.- a== - L L K J = a. _..._ H 1-18
o r. eqe 4 m s e ,;r s m- .. w s .~ e va- ' ' ^ [, M, p'. ' i', t-k 'd ? / } ) a ,e; I$ h 4 jy'.g-j i L m n - :, t y s /j .f, 4 s : g,, ,a- ~o s 3 ii g 7 ' T F p.r ,1 n. e
- ! c..
.'6 ,'4,. A i p a Wi - 4 ,,.,t f ', ',f ..,1,, ! : '(, ; 1 G. O1. i 2., I,I.'. ) r4 .l U ):w m, y L r r' . ~. - +m u ...t.:.r
- c g.,
c 7 t 7 f / + \\ w? , e ~ ) 5 g-a,s c, cr-g_ ',, ', ' g I,- \\ ~' ' 3 e ',' *p_. J ' / "' A +u.. 3<,5 [' 3 f o 4/ 4 ' ' 'f ^l,rN 4 i [,< } ,j4, r t " A 'SECTION 2.0! g i.j .) ry '[',, 7:Y{ ...'.4. ; ; f.,a s r E Y. . y ..... /....,... a q'l r L:F ;t -';2:' ENVIRONMENTALSU.RVEILLANCE P.ROGRAME '. %a ' w , '!b: :# y 9: : s IN. TERPRETATIONS AN.D T. RENDS DF lisSD, LTS.1 '2 e 'e-( .m -- - PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONu 1 i w ~ 4
- w
.3 7 e g \\ 4 Yi 'A'ikh p f,, < 4 s. i g 4 l*.,' ':sl f~ yfl}<. t .m, g 3 + x ~ f.5 N ,',r.. .. + ') w s 4 ) 9 {...j^' '1 l ~ ,',~ .f, 4 f, ' /,1% ( 7 s V I k E .q 1. Ti _7 t p g s. r 1 p 3 .'r x d ' l~4. ' j t [_ (' _ g i, y 3 ,s ? n h s i 'f '. p t, f .p .2i- ? y ...~ m;< N
- _. 4 s
.ws. s ,, u m
i 2.1 AIR PARTICULATES AND RADIOIODINES f L Note: Analytical results presentedin Tables 1.1 through 1.13 ofAttachment I and summari:. edin Section 4.0. r 2-1 4 i
2.1.1 gterpretations and Trends of Results Air particulate and Iodine-131 results for 1993 compare similarly to those I obtained in previous years of the operational and preoperational ESP. Iodine-131 remained undetectable with gross beta concentrations for indicator locations l ranging from 0.002 - 0.026 pCi/m3 with a mean of 0.012 pCi/m3 as compared to control locations which ranged from 0.003 - 0.029 pCi/m3 with a mean of 3 0.013 pCi/m. These results indicate the airborne exposure pathway has not been affected by the operation of GGNS and that airborne concentrations ) continue to be at background levels. 4 Gross beta concentrations shown in Figure 2-1 further emphasize that GGNS has had no influence on ambient radiation levels. This figure shows 1993 monthly average results compared to preoperational results, and 1985 through 1993 yearly average results for indicator locations compared to controls. Values compare similarly over the period. 2.1.2 Program Description The GGNS ESP utilizes nine continuous air samplers to provide gross beta, gamma and radioiodine activity measurements by the airborne exposure pathway. These air samplers range in distances from 0.3 to 18 miles I (Figures 1-2 and 1-3, and Table 1-2). Five air samplers met the requirements of ODCM Specification 4.12.1, located as follows: Three near the SITE BOUNDARY in areas of the highest calculated annual average groundlevel D/Q values One in a community that has the highest calculated annual average groundlevel D/Q value (Port Gibson) One in a control location (Vicksburg, MS). i i ) 2-2 1 _J
l i 1 GONS personnel located the remaining four air samplers in areas which provide supplemental data for the ESP. I GGNS personnel placed air samplers one meter above the ground in weatherproof houses, with a 2-inch glass fiber filter in the intake line af the vacuum pump and a 2 x 1-inch charcoal cartridge located directly f downstream. GGNS personnel maintained air flow at 1.25 cubic feet per minute. They changed filters and cartridges weekly and had them analyzed for 1 gross beta radionuclides and radiciodine activity, respectively. The analytical contractor analyzed quarterly composites of air filters for gamma radionuclides. i i
V FIGURE 2-1 Air Sample Gross Beta Concentrations 1993 Gross Beto Results # for Indicator Locations Avg pCl/m3 0.03 i 1979 - 1984 Prooperational Avg 0.04 1993 Operational Avg i ~ 0.03 ) 0.02 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1985 - 1993 Gross Beto Results Indicators Versus Controls Avg pCf/m3 0.05 ' ' ' h h d '~ ) ~ cnernoeys zneio nt 0.03 {T,j/'/ j / / / 0.02 / / / / / /l ! $ $ l lll3 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 2-4
l l 2.2 TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY r l l l ) ~ [ l I Note: A nalytical results presented in A ttachment 11 and summarized 1 in Section 4.0. 1~ f 1 2-5
t 2.2.1 Interpretations and Trends of Results Gamma radiation dose in 1993 compared similarly to that obtained [ in previous years as illustrated in Table 2-1. This indicates that the ambient radiation levels remained at or near background and have been uninfluenced by the operation of GGNS. Figure 2-2, which further represents this conclusion, shows 1993 quarterly average results compared to 1979-1984 preoperational data, and 1985 - 1993 annual average results for indicator locations compared to the Vicksburg control This figure indicates that ambient radiation levels have remained at or near background levels. As in previous years, GGNS personnel performed an independent verification of the accuracy of GGNS TLD results through the use ofNRC TLDs. Figure 2-3 presents NRC and GGNS results through the third quarter of 1993. The ESP collects consistent, valid data based on the similarity of TLD results. 2.2.2 Prouram Description f The ESP measures ambient radiation in the environment sun ounding I GGNS with 59 TLDs to provide a quantitative measurement of the area radiation levels. GGNS personnel placed these environmental TLDs at distances from 0 to 18 miles (Figures 1-2 and 1-3, and Table 1-3). They collected dosimeters quarterly. } The ESP used the following criteria in establishing TLD locations: ODCM Specification 4.12.1 requires 40 TLDs, positioned as outlined below: An inner ring of 16 stations in the general area of the site boundary with one TLD in each meteorological sector 1 2-6
An outer ring of 16 stations approximately in ) the 3- :a 5-mile range with one TLD in each 1 meteorological sector Eight TLDs located in special interest areas such as population centers and residences or utilized as controls. 4 Sixteen permanent TLD stations at the protected area boundary. The remaining 3 TLDs utilized as duplicates at varying locations. 4 4 - 1 2-7 .s
TABLE 2-1 l Aversee TLD Dose Rates * ~.= - Year Inner Ring Geter Ring Special Interest : Control - On-Site (Within 2-Mile Radius) (Witnic %Miic Radius) Areas (M-14) (Protected Area Boundary) 1985 16.1 16.6 17.0 20.1 20.0 1986 18.6 18.3 18.4 .19.8 21.3 1987 18.3 17.7 17.9 18.8 21.8 1988 17.8 16.7 17.3 .17.5 22.8 1989 18.0 17.6 18.5 18.2 20.9 1990 17.2 17.0 17.6 17.5 20.7 1991 18.1 17.9 17.8 18.0 23.7 1992 17.6 17.9 17.3 17.4 28.4 1993 17.8 17.9 18.5 19.8 25.3
- Units in milliremiquarter 1
1 2-8
I FIGURE 2-2 TLD Radiation Dose 1993 TLD Results Inner and Outer Rings ODCM Specificottons Within Six (6) Mile Radius 30 1979 - 1954 Prooperationo! , 29 1993 inner and outer Rings 20 4 ,/ / / // / ~ (/,/ b /' / 6, /;$ [// ,4 ~ /,- ~ 0 1ST Q1R 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR 1985 - 1993 R.D Results Inner and Outer Rings ODCM Specificottons Within Six (6) Mlle Radius Annual Avg mR/Qtr '~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 30 Vicksburg Control (M-14) i 29 inner and Outer $ Rings j 20 / 1)/ ~ / / /. / / / / /) ,/ /; / ',/ ,/ / / 'o ,/ / / / /' / / / V / /' / ,/ / / /, a / 'N I Y ,/ / I b '/ / / 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993-2-9 f
m
- ij e
t.. Q. s d. e r. l ..i 3 i M 5 .C > t R s. .N i. m i%
- i S.-
.N x G x .G x.- s m. lt u s
- ii!.
e R t s r. D st L D eG. 3 T L3 l -2 C T9 id. Mr. 0 R 9 3 1 E N C1 R 5 '- 2 U d R G n N r t I a o 2s. F S d F i N n G G a
- ij%
S N G G .i!I. r. st eQ. l id. Mr. 3 2 t 0s i. r t
- i!
Q / R m g v5 0 5 0 5 O A 2 2 1 1
- l
'l., 4 2.3 :. MILK - f t ~ Note: ' Analytical resultspresentedin Table 6.1 ofAttachment I and summari: edin Section 4.0. 2-11 =:
2.3.1 Interpretations and Trends of Results GGNS personnel did not collect milk samples within five miles of the GGNS site in 1993 due to the absence of milking animals. However, they did collect milk samples from the Alcorn State University control location and had them analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma radionuclides. As in preoperational and previous operational years, GGNS has not detected any radionuclides attributable to plant operations. The ingestion pathway shown in ODCM Specification Table 3.12.1-1 specifies the frequency and location for obtaining milk samples. In addition, Table 3.12.1-1 provides for the use of a food product pathway as an alternative in instances ofunavailable milk sampling locations. The ESP utilized this alternative in 1993. 2.3.2 Program Description ODCM Specifications require sample collection from milking animals in three locations within a five km distance having the highest dose potential. If unavailable, ODCM Specifications require one sample from milking animals in each of three areas, between five to eight km, where calculated doses exceed 1.0 millirem per year. ODCM Specifications also require one control sample at a distance of 15-30 km. GGNS personnel collect a control milk sample semiannually from the Alcom State University Dairy (Figure 1-3 and Table 1-4) to establish background t data. However, the ESP did not include milk animals in 1993 within eight km (five miles) of GGNS due to unavailability. Therefore, Section 2.5, Vegetation, i addresses the unavailability of milk samples within the vicinity of GGNS. [ 2-12
i 2.4 WATER l l l l f i ) 1 - Note: Analytical resultspresented in Tables 2.1 through 4.6 ofAttachment I and summarizedin Section 4.0. \\. 2-13
l i 2.4.1 Internretations and Trends of Results Cistern Water GGNS personnel collected cistern water samples and had them analyzed for gross beta radionuclides, Iodine-131, tritium and gamma radionuclides. Iodine-131, tritium and gamma radionuclides during 1993, and as in preoperational and previous operational years, remained at or near background levels. Gross beta concentrations for indicator locations ranged from 2.3 - 7.5 pCi/l with a mean of 4.8 pCi/l as compared to the control which ranged from 1.4 - 10.1 pCi/l with a mean of 4.7 pCi/1. In addition, the 1993 gross beta indicator mean is similar to the average preoperational mean of 4.4 pCi/1. Overall, concentrations continue to remain at background levels. Surface Water GGNS personnel collected surface water samples and had them analyzed for tritium and gamma radionuclides. As in preoperational and previous operational years, gamma radionuclide concentrations remained at background levels. i Tritium levels for Discharge Basin surface water ranged from 2560.0 - 5440.0 pCi/l with a mean of 4026.7 pCi/1. Plant operations and radwaste discharges in 1993 contributed to these levels. Figure 2-4, which shows an increase in tritium levels, presents results from 1985 through 1993 for the ~ p }; Discharge Basin. GGNS personnel closely monitors results from this area, even though levels continue to be below the technical specification reporting level of 20,000 pCi/l for drinking water, as a comparison. Tritium activity at the upstream and downstream Mississippi River locations continue to remain at background levels. 2-14 x _.
Groundwater GGNS personnel collected groundwater samples quarterly and had them analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. As in preoperational and previous operational years, concentrations remained at background levels. 2.4.2 Procram Description ODCM Specifications require water sample collection in the vicinity of GGNS for the measurement of radioactivity by the waterborne exposure pathway. GGNS personnel sampled cistern water monthly at two locations, an indicator near the site (McGee) and a control (Willis) (Figure 1-2 and Table 1-4). They collected samples in labeled containers and had them analyzed for gross beta radionuclides, Iodine-131, gamma radionuclides and a quarterly composite tritium. GGNS personnel sampled surface water from the Mississippi River monthly at points upstream (control) and downstream (indicator) of the plant discharge (Figure 1-2 and Table 1-4). They collected samples in labeled containers and had them analyzed for gamma radionuclides and a quarterly composite tritium. GGNS personnel took an additional surface water sample from the GGNS Discharce Basin. They composited this sample monthly with an automatic sampler that collected a preset volume at hourly intervals. They collected the sample in a labeled container and had it analyzed for gamma radionuclides and a quarterly composite tritium. l GGNS personnel sampled croundwater quarterly from two locations (Figure 1-2 and Table 1-4), Arnold Acres (indicator location) and Port Gibson City (control location). They collected samples in labeled containers and had them analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. 2-15
FIGURE 2-4 Discharge Basin Tritium Results Tritium Results for Discharge Basin Avg pCi/l + '5,000 4.0 / 3jE6 I 1992 A0 "". ~ 4,000 (957 pCl/.I) g i / l j 1985 Baseline Avg / (473 pCl/l) 3,000 p p // i // 2.000 // / ~ 1,283 / 1,109 /./ 902 798 913 9 s 3.............. 3.....R5 / ? s000 ,y a 31 ?l si 61 81 31 s1 6 0 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990. 1991 1992 1993 2-16
2.5 VEGETATION i Note: Analytical resultspresentedin Tables S.] through S.3a ofAttachment I and summarizedin Section 4.0. I 2-17
2.5.1 Interpretations and Trends of Results GGNS personnel collected vegetation samples and had them analyzed for gamma radionuclides and Iodine-131. As in preoperational and previous operational years, GGNS did not detect any plant-related radionuclides. 2.5.2 Program Description GGNS personnel collected broadleaf vegetation samples monthly for measurement of radioactivity by the ingestion exposure pathway, due to the unavailability of milk samples within five miles of GGNS. ODCM Specifications require samples of three different kinds of broadleaf vegetation grown nearest each of two different offsite locations with highest anticipated l annual average groundlevel D/Q. GGNS personnel met vegetation sampling requirements by maintaining two gardens inside the SITE BOUNDARY, Sectors J and R. These sampling locations (Figure 1-2 and Table 1-5) provided a more conservative assessment of doses due to the higher deposition rates (D/Qs) than would be measured at t offsite sampling locations. ODCM Specifications also require control samples of each of the similar types of onsite vegetation 15-30 km from the site. To fulfill this requirement, the ESP established a control vegetation sample location in t Sector K at A] corn State University (Figure 1-3 and Table 1-5). The ESP prefers green-leafy vegetables suitable for human consumption as the primary source of broadleaf vegetation. At times, GGNS personnel took samples of any vegetation with relatively broad l 1 leaves on which airborne radioactive particulate material might be j l deposited, due to unavailability of green-leafy vegetables suitable for l i human consumption. They had the raw samples analyzed for gamma radionuclides and Iodine-131. 2-18
2.6 SEDIMENT __ l 3 i Note: Analytical results presented in Table 8.1 ofAttachment I and summarized an Section 4.0, 2-19
2.6.1 Internretations and Trends of Results GGNS personnel collected sediment samples and had them analyzed for gamma radionuclides. Even though GGNS detected Cesium-137 during the preoperational years at a concentration of 200,0 pCi/kg and over previous operational years which averaged 77.7 pCi/kg, gamma radionuclides remained undetectable at the upstream location. The downstream location (Hamilton Lake) contained a Cesium-137 average concentration of 79.0 pCi/kg, as compared to the preoperational average of 295.0 pCi/kg and operational average of 85.9 pCi/kg. Therefore, levels at the upstream and downstream locations continue to remain similar to those of previous years. i Table 2-2 provides an analytical results summary for 1985 through 1993 barge slip sediment samples. GGNS personnel attributes the presence of this radioactivity to buildup of very small amounts of particulates since 1985. Although this table shows an increase in activity during 1993, a comparison over previous years shows radionuclide concentrations in the barge slip sediment f stabilizing. Although, previous sampling of the barge slip sediment revealed a wide range of activity, GGNS personnel have found no definite correlation between radionuclide concentrations and plant operating levels, effluent releases or river elevation. 2.6.2 Procram Description GGNS personnel collected sediment samples semiannually at the following locations (Figure 1-2 and Table 1-5): River shoreline in plant effluent discharge (Barge Slip) l Downstream of the barge slip in the vicinity of the Hamilton Lake outfall(indicator location) Upstream from the GGNS discharge (Upper Grand Gulf Landing) 2-20
i n p ODCM Specifications require only a sediment sample from the downstream location (indicator) However, the ESP utilized additional samples from an upstream location (control) and the barge slip (indicator), GGNS personnel collected sediment samples near the shoreline l from the top one-inch layer of sediment. They then discarded foreign t objects and transferred the samples to clean, labeled containers for gamma radionuclide analyses. i j k .i i t i t t 4 2-21 l
i 3 n 0 0 0 5 5 9 a 2 0 D 7 3 9 1 e 9 3 9 4 4 7 1 2 5 N M 1 9 4 1 1 1 2 n 0 0 0 9 ae 4 D D 4 D D 6 9 6 M N N 9 N N 7 1 1 2 n 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 a 2 D 7 D 5 1 e 9 5 9 7 0 N 4 M 2 N 5 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 9 ae 8 D 4 3 D 4 9 9 5 N 3 N 2 2 5 y M 2 4 8 1 1 ra m mu S l a 9 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 8 a i e 4 D 6 9 4 9 6 9 3 9 0 5 3 N 5 M 7 t 2 y 1 7 1 1 1 l 2 a E n 2 ~ L A 2-B t 2 n A e T m 8 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ i d 8 ae 0 D 8 7 9 2 2 e 9 2 7 0 4 8 N 8 M 4 1 S 6 7 1 1 p i lS eera B 7 n 0 0 0 0 0 8 a 5 D 3 9 4 0 9 e 0 5 7 9 2 N 0 9 8 M 4 8 1 7 1 1 2 1 6 n 0 0 0 m 0 8 ae 7 D 3 D D a 8 9 9 3 N 9 N N 9 g 6 r M 1 8 2 o lik/se ir 5 n 0 0 0 0 e e u d 8 a 3 D 3 7 D D 0 o t e 9 c c 9 M 2 N 9 8 N N 4 i e 1 4 4 2 p t 1 e n d i e s t n in o U N e 4 1 id 5 5 4 7 8 0 3 3 e 9 5 6 m lc s 1 1 io a u e 5 n n n lt lt u m m i a a o b b m is is u u g o o o r d i a 't C u e e n I a C C l t M C I 1l
I 2.7 FISH i l i f Note: Analyticalresultspresentedin Tables 7.1 and 7.2 ofAttachmentI and summari: edin Section 4.0. ( 2-23
I' 2.7.1 Interpretations and Trends of Results GGNS personnel collected fish samples semiannually from two locations and had them analyzed for gamma radionuclides. Analytical results for fish in 1993 and previous preoperational and operational years have shown no data which was j attributable to the operation of GGNS. 2.7.2 Program Description t GGNS personnel collected fish semiannually in the Mississippi River at the following locations (Figure 1-2 and Table 1-5): Downstream of the GGNS discharge point into the Mississippi River (indicator location) [ Upstream of the GGNS discharge point into the Mississippi River uninfluenced by plant operations (control location). f GGNS personnel collected fish by net, trotline, electroshock or purchased from commercial fishermen. They accompanied commercial fishermen, when purchasing samples, to ensure representative and valid samples from required loc.t ons. i GGNS personnel collected a sufficient amount from each location to L provide a minimum of 1000 grams (wet weight) of eviscerated fish sample. L They had the samples analyzed for gamma radionuclides, a f 2-24 1
1 f' 2.8 SPECIAL SAMPLES I i I i Note: Analytical results presented in Tables 9.1 through 12.2 ofAttachment 1 l andsummarizedin Section 4.0.
h-2.8.1 Interpretations and Trends of Result.s In 1993, GGNS personnel collected eight special samples and had them analyzed for gamma radionuclides. Discussion below provides descriptions of special samples collected and their results. Surface Water - One sample from Outfall 010 - I Plant-related radionuclides not detected. Sediment - One sample from Basin A and one sample from Basin B - Cesium-137 detected in Basin A. Section 4.0 summarizes results. Sewane Sludge - Four samples from Unit 1 Sewage Plant sludge (Outfall 010) - Plant-related radionuclides detected. I Section 4.0 summarizes results. Venison - One sample from Bucksnon Hunting Camp. [ Plant-related radionuclides not detected. 2.8.2 Program Description GGNS personnel collected special samples occasionally from y nonroutine ESP locations to provide supplementary data and to address areas of special interests. Sample media may include sediment, water, milk, fish, meat and vegetation and may be analyzed for gamma radionuclides, Iodine-131, tritium or gross beta radionuclides depending upon current interest. L p I f 2-26 l
i l i f' b 2.9 ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS \\ ) L l 2-27
b 2.9.1 Interpretations and Trends of Results GGNS did not modify the ESP, even though some minor changes ) occurred from 1992 to 1993, as shown in Table 2-3. Also, the land use census identified no location which would yield a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than those currently being calculated. f L The 1993 Land Use Census results indicated land uses in the zero to 5-mile area surrounding GGNS have remained basically the same as b those reported in the 1991 and 1992 Annual Land Use Census. Table 2-4 } presents the 1993 Land Use Census data sheets. 2.9.2 Program Description GGNS personnel conducted an Annual Land Use Census as required by ODCM Specification 3.12.2. This census identifies changes in uses ofland in unrestricted areas surrounding GGNS which would require modifications to { the ESP or ODCM. The land use census identified important criteria in each of the 16 meteorological sectors, such as nearest: i Residence }- Animal milked for human consumption Garden of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) producing broadleaf vegetation. GGNS personnel conducted the 1993 Land Use Census by: h Five mile field survey confirmation in each sector to locate: Nearest permanent residence Nearest unoccupied residence ) l-Nearest garden and approximate size Nearest milking animal. 2-28
l Telephone confirmation in several instances when personal contact could not be made. Identifying locations on the map, measuring distances to GGNS and recording results on data sheets. Comparing 1993 census results to 1992 census results. 1 f i k i 2-29
TABLE 2-3 I 1992-1993 Land Use Census Chances Sector Parameter 1992 Data 1993 Data - Reason for Change A Nearest Occupied Elizabeth McGee Henry Gaines Ms. McGee died and Mr. Gaines (brother) is now living in her Residence house. E Nearest Occupied Roy Rogers Johnnie Hadad Mr. Rogers died and wife married Mr. Hadad. They are living Residence at the former Mr. Rogers residence. [ F* Nearest Broadleaf Wilbert Porter, Sr. David Killingsworth Closer garden identified during census. Garden 7.8 " ' 7.2 *
- f G*
Nearest Occupied Sherman Williams Will Hawthorne Williams house vacant. Hawthome now closest residence. Residence 3.1 " 3.3 " 11' Nearest Occupied John Nichols Bobby Waddle Nichols house vacant. Mr. Waddle is living part-time in Residence 1.8 " ' l.8 *
- Amold house across road, K
Nearest Broadleaf Jim Cassell, Jr.. . Jim Cassell, Jr. Mr. Cassell grew a larger garden. Garden ~ 50 m2 ~ 400 m2 P Nearest Occupied Wallace Watson Wallace Watson Number of occupants decreased from four (4) to three (3). Residence R Nearest Broadleaf GGNS (ENV) GGNS (ENV) Map changes. Garden 1.2 " . l.6 * *
- Represents changes associated with Land Use Census requirements.
- Distances in kilometers.
2-30
-l I TABLE 2-4 1993 Land Use Census Parameter Sector A Sector n Sector C Sector D 1. Nearest
- a. Distance (km) 1.5 Occupied Residence 1.2 1.1 4.3
- b. Name
!!cmy Gaines
- Mary L Dotson Lane!I Frazier Ethel M. Ryals l
- c. Address Rt. 2. Box 391 Rt. 2 Box 391 P.O. Box 33 Rt. 2, Box 372B i
i Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS
- d. Numberof Occupants 1
4 3 6
- 11. Nearest
- a. Distance (km)
None Unoccupied Residence None None None Ill. Nearest
- a. Distance (km)
,1tilk <inimal None None None None
- b. Owner's Name IV Nearest
- a. Distance (km)
None None 7.7 4.5 !!roadleefGarden
- b. Owner's Name
- c. Address Issac Mays John 1 Jackson Rt.2 Rt.2 Dox 371E Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS
- d. Garden Size (m )
2 ~290 -200 V. Census
- a. Is nearest occupied residence Compariren in same location as last census?
Yes Yes Yes Yes l
- b. Is nearest milk animal in same location as last census?
N/A N/A N/A N/A
- c. Is nearest broadleafgarden in same location as last census?
N/A N/A Yes Yes 2-31 i . _ ~,, _ _. - - - ^
TADLE 2-4 1993 Land Use Census Parameter Sector E Sector F Sector G Sector 11 1 Nearest
- a. Distance (km) 1.0 7.0 IkcupiedResidence 3.3
- 1.E *
- b. Name Johnnielisdad *
- e. Address Dykes Cupstid Willllawthorne
- Dobby Waddle
- P.O. Dox 783 Rt. 2. Ucx 156 Rt. 2, Box 415 Rt. 2 Box 414 Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Pon Gibson, MS
- d. Number ofOccupants 2
4 4* 2* II. Nearest
- a. Distance (km)
None None None None Unoccupied Residence Ill. Nearest
- a. Distance (km)
Afilk Animal None None None None
- b. Owner's Name IV. Nearest
- a. Distance (km) 1.3 7.2
- 3.4 6.7 ffroadleafGarden
- b. Owner's Name Iliram Wells
- c. Address David Killingsworth
- Buckner(David Doyle)
L C. Jones Rt. 2, Box 399A Rt. 2, Box 150C Rt. ?. Dox 416A P.O. Box 174 Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS 2
- d. GardenSize(m )
-100 -l80 * ~1000 (Grapes) ' ~100 V. Census
- s. Is nearest occupied residence
' Comparison in same location as last census? Yes Yes No No b Is nearest milk animal in same location as last census? N/A N/A N/A N/A
- c. Is nearest broadicargarden in same location as last census?
Yes No Yes Yes
- Changed since 1992 census.
2-32 i _._,--______---__----.___.__N.-_-_ ~
71 TAILLE 2-4 1993 Lanti Use Census I Parameter SectorJ Ttor K Sector 1. Sector M l. Nearcsr
- a. Distance (km) 5.0 35 1.4 None Occupied Residence
- b. Name Steve Price Jim Cassell, Jr.
Glodjo (Buddy Roddey)
- c. Address Rt.1 Box 412D Rt. 2, Box 401 Rt. 2, Dox 401
~ Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS d Number of Occupants 2 4 4 II. Nearcir
- a. Distance (km) 3.8 Mone None None l/noccupirJ Residence (Dill CassellIlause)
III Nearest
- a. Distance (Lm)
None None He None Ali!L sinimal
- b. Owners Name IV Nearest
- a. Distance (km) 0.6 3.5 1.4 None UroadleafGarden
- b. Owner's Name GGNS (ENV)
Jim Cassell, Jr. Glodjo(Buddy Roddey)
- c. Address P.O. Dox 756 Rt. 2, Box 404 Rt. 2, Box 40t Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS Port Gibson, MS 2
- d. GardenSize(m )
4 10 ~400* ~100 V. Census
- a. Is nearest occupied residence comparison in same location as last census?
Yes Yes Yes N/A
- b. Is nearest milk animal in same Ic:"bn as last census?
N/A N/A N/A N/A
- c. Is nearest broadleaf garden in same location as last census?
Yes Yes Yes N/A ' Changed since 1992 census. 2-33 p
S y .S V)6 M,
- ed0M, d9 5 n R
o3 n N7o Rx o Exs r s e e ( ob 0 o 7 eobi N N 5 n n s A s o o 6 SB.Gi 8 e / e l in I.G t 1 N 3 S r .t G O. t ~ Y N Y c t I e s2 r i r o ht o GPP CRP )p Q ma r e
- 6. C e
e o n n n n A A A o c N 5 a o o / / / t N N N N N e ta S cu Y ( n ) ta1 s2 A p n o o m A a ts2 P L, L. 1 W3 h a C W3 r xp e h 0 o 7 eo e 3
- 9. b n
7 eo e 3 e / e x p 0 s A s b o t 7 cBs 6 o 7 cBs ~ Y N Y c a. o N a e l . o la O.J. C. S l la O. J WP S D WPS t r t s u ( sne 4 C 2 e s E U ) i L p 4 B d N m 3 a n r e
- 6. C e
e 2 A a o n n n A A A o t T L tc N 2 r o o / / / o N N N N N e n 3 S s 9 kc 9 u 1_ B ( ?s e e u m n? s n n a is ce e s nu es c n s i t i d n d ? r e s s l s a c ea a u gt tn rl ms f s a d s n a p ) e a ine leal u 2 ipn ac s t c m o t d a ) c ) ) e ui k ) e m O m m m m m ct il s a ( a o n e c a a r o k f k k aN 'r. N iz oc mls bi ( o ( ( o t S s l t a t a e t s r e e s s c s e r c s s s e c c r c t s n e e e n eo n ee b n n r r o rl r e n e e e a m ai a e e a md m a ta t t ad u i Di O D OA G s in s o s n a r d e a e ta nm w t md e is t e s s s r ns n m D NA N D i vd a c a a I I l s s I u r s a a.
- b. c.
d a. a b. a
- b. c d
a b. c. n P ec e 2 e c c n 9 n e 9 e d n 1 i e d s d e i e r c se R l a n n R d a G o s i s d e r ]a s i i d t e i r s i t p t n t c s a e e p s u si si t c e s ed u p c r u r c r r a n s en a a c a a ak a o n e c e ei e e o l N O N U N f n A NI C C h r t 1. C I. I 1 V. V I 1 I ~ i j 1
3 9 tea / D { 7 -// / f N tu f te 3 te e r f~ D ? D a a lh f A s f i /- y i s n [ / 2 e 4 C / t 2 e ) s t E U l L / I_ 5 B d I 3-n 2 A a h T L k, 3 9 u 9 g 1 L e e r r tu u y a ta b n n d ig ig e S S tc u d n s o no C i t s a m us 7O n I e tn C e s e e rP L d S na V s io d. {} u s e v e r n s n ir d e c t u e P e e n a q ir -J t c e u d e f r c a f R q e v e o T n i c n it r fi i e r o e o D e i n s r a N D ig ig n R i y p u f n o t q B p s i o if n i o e s t 'd p l N R d A r S a I e u t -w m x x l ) e e ) c s ) ) ) ) l w L e o a x p e s i C C n i a n o e ( ( ( ( ( ( r s m R n e b. C R R l 1 l l l l i V I i V V V ~ ,l l lI{t Ill \\I 1i I
wqEQ7,km%N?!.[p,'4v i M ~-v.n ~
- e %;n m v.'D; f % 25~5 % fr'".
w w.
- u m W M u ~ m.,
- 4 WnM my.**
h x M b. Q Q W %',4' 3 C + W:& fl5e dd: h %,O.=:&90 %.%N:ra ' "l V , qnn nm u.$ #-,- N.'Wf. %sw?-,r wn.m( %q Q J .hQ W IG, f 7 W ~ L, ' l y^ *p 2: < & '.q,:hY ',Y mjQ b4 (&w CMNGUQ-m, p+ y " =ph ' -mo t s w nn @3.~9;Q c y a ,m / :w- ?i;~"%x': &.y w A,.q v s - m nn-
- i. ?v sn,Y@p !n.
~ ~ M b Myf, ~ec.n k.m % W m2; g. MQ &a % ??y' 4q
- ~ i M"
>. m m,(y 'Ge, w%p m fy s' VM f, w;i r 8. am m +. a,j'8(... m iM ',.[ '4 v- ~e .~ k'",, h.' n 'a O i h 's c:., [. ,q:(a si.'., , e I" I f 6 N 9, I r/ + 7
- h_
L P N (. y j2.Q. yn;f 's r'k; W s > T. 4'. 4 gp..ms.;p.p83;' 4 e 4i %wp% a t s rW o.g wd e m, m% m.ow % !v-y 5 C w y &i n ,cy.a w, y.. y @(_ r
- w'w+y,,#g,~&.s gg N.w.
i Mh 5 i h, m,.,
- M,y; +n +,,,c.C, W v g%w~ y%c/ ~
"4 4 / W4 y W w' - p,. m.Y*w] a de : ns m-m' c g ; n,., s .,:a aw.w 8s i ? 9 o
- m. T,
, 1 . : - nno,p%; lo}m% a s... a ju..s n.o o Af&p a n m--4 n. y' t }k^;,q-'a C.wlf; y 2 r s -. g-p s$ "w~
- Q.?.vn.~ y
- m;?.
a ^ [$$q' e h l .. f~ jQ; u ..3, s 1 .e m Al%" A 1 + w" p s a+, ,1-*(. g. t ]- 4 'I. n'.' 7, - w p,. v d%, t,r.<.,Aa;$@r. 69 M v& 'j~ .:M y w.;g '^c:J f y 3. s .f'- t.L3,., w y q 3 6.Zd! ^ 3 ,c c ,w' _' d, W.y. -i i f e. ' -e ' :4 7 1 L p;/C M .+y , a... Ad e-::Te y:i 4,p~ v - %m.a,. u., >7
- 4...t,
+ c-w s s. j r.,, eh tss:t 75, i g.c .s e 4 p,. h,s. 4 x v- >c...._ -s...e4 ou ys 3 f i . "f g.- I' ~. K';(.'f.-[+;f./ [ I[~l, -q M-h M T y,i,,., j t '~ q, ( ns ~c n t ,e y _s, x e,g,,, .,., e -r a aw ue a # >'ry ' - c. v -i,y '.'s q.+* M.J - O. j. q# _9ygd;y., 's:- <yg t.v
- s. sW u,
a ,, '#y. ,4 -. : 'i .g sg. ,n c. s e. t 4 u i 's f;,p ^ - - yyy( d',. 4 t j {,; g.g g3,1 y ~w, .;:p ~ c. h un
- em y
+ ...w m h, an rh Q.f hy.5,l01l) N ?.), _ ff $aQv ^N $qw\\MNhp:39 c.v.x, N . w%C we >, e + e 'w + " Qyy/E y
- b Ht t
a 1 < ~,, k ^ M. 4: 9 ki h((g g gg[d 1 ,j d y o-t, t' m, J,3 'g' + ,a a a;Q \\v i, ed, p;Q:h:#,:.: Rwl%::g % m.:&:yyyl is 3,
- " M,it
- ;mw, -
wy k. s.3 m 3%
- p!Q,r.wn t t$
L.p %y;ny s l.a.#j-@ 7.m r x .se r rOJ p b ,..Q, %., s.t m n .9 m; - , FQQ.OdQ ,i ..3 s., ,4 t 1 t -~ 3 s r dkq, W'.Hd.q:pQ w,^ ::;y,,) um l, y:-Q ' * ' y:. ^ N ph 'e
- M
- 2. M@lh hy A.y@yg
- Qd b ybg.
- y" {; t ~,,..g.
94 -,0+ -QQ ~. .,t. n .* J a 3 :p s @.: a !* s r ^ X< J W D' h d <f %v% h '
- e.29$
C% p & y}'M, peg'% u e-o M 3 s .c Q@&,;.9 '+ ~ 4ffh,n; y hfp ?.p;fW[' i, n..n n.cu r 1 s n e 4 ^' f& { e . ~ e.c 4 1 . - -. : o. L,;f s, &m m y '. e .<. ~:t;y%;>y,? y:%J,:- / + J.
- 3 AP
, v,1 :;a ,:. :, 4 p..e, e m.; ), p ly,$,.
- 4., gU. j, M.Iy,e d p
' en '1 %,-- W.W'. c. .A,.' 4 N (,
- .7
.p i M. a 3] '. ' yk- .s. ;,1 ( h .9 r (, m3. g.,, -h,,c,,<. } 3
- v. e. - y-F.
4
- '
- g rj J ? v,.,$ j p gu't. >
e 5 4 "g ...p:s
- 4) p' +: >- p
\\ 7 4 .xn \\; g,y,g. p; w.,4 m, w g. rq 7 + ge hy. y 9,f.3 ,3g qw 4 y f;,< gx [j,s y,s ey a (.y x:re.. p@c c
- >.y-yg, %ws
- a.
j n t, ,. %r.wa m ~ m 't.c? ~, f., L::p' ?. 8.r W'J,"p,, .h. w, 7 g m#1.%y ,.p;, a a v 'k ' 4 1'4 W 4, .M 7 [^4 h. 4yrg /%'.'- I g i f j .b y ,- i :$ .- - sy e;, %m-s. w ( 4 i c . y
- y
,m... ..In,7 } 4... -f, bQg-M %pyl' W:wn \\ .o'.yi 3+ l - ;p,b4' l .-M ..w s n. um
- y.,,
, g.:.h x w.e.s. J.SEC.T10N'3.,0,1 Cs " W W t a W M yA S' M, w me.M.m w o n s A'"s k~& .yyng n,, _ c, k
- s..g'
.w a.u^ y,). qw Jn a 1m
- .,pj r
k ,j.fy.'"k f-l} f, W% y' Q: z n, n;; $42 WS UgM l hns&EN.MM. f 9 m c N LYTICA. OPRO, GR5MTN.UH. $CANi$ESD.RIPYION. NNn% 2 4,9&p%g%m%w9@QQ-@~ gf,; M.,x ' ^ ' Q:;, f Q S + 9 W, ~ jn,g/gu~. vy-yA g AwR, J. p y$ %..yWn '%a Wsw w ..#o4c.g % s, w, ,.g- , m.-, i. Ly n..p& m rw. u f gnbPp. $1 . y n y h..:- tp 5 .g ( a r M /z' $ p d d. WQ gMp A re s.p ^ g.,. fM7 g4.l. up fr n q3.:,ep %g.,Q.n<f 4ir ~ t y E.. , yws. 'snm 1 r,'N;z, u gu
- MW;'
?dp %jbu'g' g. 6., o : A-i af,L w..,+ + i ^ l2 99 >;p %a,.e f'.h,';WA%p, r '.w w.. y3 4%g,1j c y? 7, WMWQi \\* -~p< 4' f.1s, q&..%w@c x v y,y5 , - e@m Q , ya. n u p. a 4,,. ..Z>, j,. ;y3 3 + 9 ( pg. u e p - 7 s, or r > >w' u } deu gg,.Jy-w%1 %y n a. m 'qOg w .. c ..p 'M,Q U@f. 1 r ,s + w M. c j.:s q. g .w.. o..a e N p us .s 3 3 .. ? 3,~ *.e m,,s-w c.c,.3 y gf,v. m s >. w o.O h,-{rv, y p nwm
- w m
- 1 I -:;...7g }
- 4 g y u; pW gg "g '
f* 9 fa" (_ . t' .I 1 'r,, ? d' i [ V,y J, +' , g*.t e toe (',.w@anM'*( t v' '.rw \\ 7 q av 4 v e ..y 5 xw W' ^ q _... 4j ,a. cd 3 H;Q,4 y.W;- 3. y W y;. y q.y Q M....', ~*,My y,. s,_gn *.
- g..q,u
. n s x;W.. m.;.c
- .,~
>~r ,, :pa >,; ,. nyn.n.. 1, a~ m m> m*.w:t e;. ,m;yw n e. ^:. ;.J y.- ~ 'g,' d, '31, 1 u. ..w s.m s u a we w;"M" " % f "L' u (,M' +Qj r i 3 s, 1 c %,q wW
- n,y,
,, t'y.t79 s
- g,7PQ 4h'. t,a.,t
'gg ' v:r-n h(M,o ,c t ^, QQ MA Q:;E, np g'p;, ;< r Kqf' Q' 4 ;l:fQ Q;p.g N f.. v.- 4 V,y,, M %,'q):t 3@ & ? i2 ~ ,a :, 1 .k .h. W q p' p 2 .y y: a, s
- e..m -
? ,w vm wk t .. m,.~ ^y c. i 8 ,.-3 m m , k;a@s.:f js ,, f.a w.; yp'4 y ytmth;,- 1. y ?. V Mm y yn,M' + + y, 2 h. 3;;~~ yf.:~'.~ W&p' 'u -a ,9W,'N?r' p., ; 5 $ Iv.,.yM r. 3 p_ n.f. - W
- Q'l W
z.. y ..#,m,' r. t r .a .v g pj% o"~-
- n y y ga) r
,t d c.e ? w b.Q kNiY s i NI 3k - ~, .m .g..+i
- ssn.Wh.h,. pn,
p em g4 >j m - %w m
- o. qqg y, p
. n 1 m,c7 1 4 .s ax 4 r' m.3 s .a il. r2v s, w. s k.,. .W,.4 1;)'d'; n $ ~: W W W -.4.pd.L. \\;,s. -a
- ,u.' 1I
,/4 4 4 ,.. ~ f l . #, j W W'.' p- ' qb[d<=f y.c y 'u v-[ -.N.. A f"" } g
- , j j
., M f:f.W ;4 i ,c....a-~ ,ry ...._y, g 4 r J
- v. s m
W -"4 9.;/ ' %b t Y 7hy. 5 ...;'g t' \\. q' p' c ...a r-G.,. .9- . p.;d-y,,., ,; ~ - 4.e p,,y,, L d g . q. y h. ,,,) 4 in wy, D'.I. h P A,1 s, e,1 @vuw g - 3d ,.. wqw,y, n mp., g. c. s..p' , r.. s v;.$ E".,,. .e u ._~.. , ( ng i f
- a., m.f:, y '
- c.~ g'.;;;y ('rj %ff.;?[e'gw + v.5,%y <
.s, m;s;,.;[ y
- . y'w, 7
- Q s
g a
- \\7 e
q., g:y:p m y) ' c4.. w.p%g e;s u i
- pp
,s a w h.s, p:.\\ ~ e v 1 s s 7 + " w ; T.yp; >ok &g Q. ; s . h i % ;.n .x' y 4 o g .. v n. y ..4 q,w[,..., .. ' Y 9' 3 f? k ',' r.w, 1 ..~_"'..'.,J' .,q,,i.
- b
k.j' .,. -h. ~ q,. 'I ~ y .p ,,- /, * &'r Y
- p;M..
n- .s = , fi... f' .) < < ~ &. L. 5.'[ '[ ? ' 9'" ' K'. am/ ~/ %[, w fQ , ~l i h. ~ + t \\ ~ q
- u e.
i a J '.y. b ls .y...; + u ~ -7?E ,.w. .gn .x ~( M:: r + +M,,. f& q. F ' s 5 .. y iy (as-u.y - ., ' &'[& R )w,y*.' 1
- .e -
?j' .,,j. : ~$' s}vl 'n> l .QG:%. .a. +.s ,i't, (.,:f.,b 4K ^ .+ g w +MQ, MMap .- ym 2$
- 1,, v.
[p rw t m,. m q, i ..y, w. v. y_f - "M , dk,l N g j4, y.f. $.J[ [ ,p t > a n. <w \\ gj< / " G_' , y v. - + } ..x ' 9 q~ p i > ,...d, g\\ S mk; s. W.y y 4: % A Q fs 6
- I f,,s
t w d nA !.'n ,..y 1 7,' 4 M: 3 ' f d; .< y;r >e 3 3.,y. ee. A "; s- @p; , _;.9 4 y '.f %o ,a. / Q-r.y. - -. k _J s$. 3 t g g. .n, ..q [ ] *E*'.,s ,rl 5
- i
.,n
- g,.-
t vi., yu .] I e ,g-- , yn ; W:' { s, 9;/- O i p 2,3... ; -a n ;.w, g . s c- . y. e n s r s w k e g / g.g Mc ~g~. g + 4 4 r t"! ' ~ rr L, f I L a -j ib .M nh j,M a ,g e ,w 8 x -w _ f';: <;r.;- 6 y'.; M e..h,,a t :m"
- %y
,N V:h, D,. ( f f nf[t;Nw. ?; %_?Qh.:,.wy .s a w-- -- e, yv. e J,l (A: 4. .e- ? , <, p s. v:., w,,.,w %a;-. - M. qy +s, > < r y ; q; e
3.1 Samnle Handline and Treatment The laboratory staff treats and stores samples upon receipt. Environmental samples frequently require treatment prior to analysis, depending on media and analyses type. W 3.1.1 Water Samples Generally, field personnel acidify one-gallon water samples with five milliliters (ml) of concentrated hydrochloric acid when collected, unless otherwise directed by the ana'ytical laboratory. Tritium samples for analyses are not usually L stored in polyethylene bottles for more than three or four months because water can evaporate through polyethylene. 3.1.2 Air Filters The laboratory handled air filters with care during heavy dust loadings to j avoid removing any particulate matter. They normally received air filters in plastic containers; the container as well as sample required analysis for some extremely f low-level analyses. 3.1.3 Milk I The laboratory usually refrigerated milk samples until analyzed. They added a preservative (formaldehyde), if analyses delayed for more than a few days, to inhibit bacterial growth and retard spoilage. Unless shipped on ice, milk samples analyzed for Iodine-131 require addition of 100 ml formaldehyde, of which field personnel normally add 40 ml prior to shipment, to avoid binding of the iodine that may occur with smaller levels of formaldehyde. } 3.1.4 Soil and Bottom Sediment The laboratory dried, pulverized and sieved soil and sediment samples f before analysis. They then mixed the samples to ensure a homogeneous mixture. 3.i
3.1.5 [ ther Samples 4 The laboratory preserved perishable samples by refrigeration or freezing. Vegetation and other samples may require drying, pulverizing or ashing before or I after analysis for long-term storage. 3.2 Gross Beta Air Sample Analysis The laboratory counted air filters for 100 minutes, or until required LLDs shown in ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved, in a low-background alpha-beta counter at least 24 hours after collection to allow for decay of short-lived materials such t as radon and thoron. 3.3 Gross Beta Water Sample Analysis This process is used to measure overall beta radionuclides of water samples without identifying specific radioactive isotope present. This analysis involves evaporating a two hundred mi sample in a beaker and then drying beaker residue in a 2-inch stainless steel planchet at 100 C. l The laboratory counted the planchets for 100 minutes, or until required LLDs shown in GGNS ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved, in a low-background alpha-beta counting system. Activity calculation includes a self-absorption correction factor for counter efficiency based on weight of residue on each planchet. 3.4 Tritium Water Sample Analysis The laboratory addc.' five ml ofwater to 15 ml ofliquid scintillation solution in a 25 ml vial and then inserted the vial into a liquid scintillation spectrometer for a 300-500 minute count, or until required LLDs shown in GGNS ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved. f 3-2 1
~ 3.5-Iodine-131 Sample Analysis I The laboratory mixed up to four liters of sample with a stable iodine carrier solution and passed the sample through an anion exchange resin column to remove iodine from the sample. Next, they strip the iodine from the resin with a sodium 7. hypochlorite solution, reduce with hydroxylamine hydrochloride and extract into carbon tetrachloride as free iodine. They then back-extract the free iodine into sodium bisulfite solution and precipitate as silver iodide. The laboratory weighs the precipitate to determine chemical yield and mounts on a stainless steel planchet for low-level beta ) counting for 300 - 600 minutes, or until required LLDs shown in ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved. Finally, they correct the chemical yield by measuring the stable iodide content of milk or water with a specific ion electrode. 3.6 Gamma Is9 topic Sampic Analysis 3.6.1 Milk and Water The laboratory fills a 3.5-liter Marinelli beaker with a representative aliquot of the sample and counts for a minimum of 240 minutes, or until required - LLDs shown in GGNS ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved, in a t shielded Germanium-Lithium (GeLi) detector coupled to a computer-based data acquisition system which performed a pulse height analysis. A computer software program defmes peaks by certain changes in slope of the spectrum. The program also compares energy of each peak with a library of peaks for radionuclide identification and then performs calculation using appropriate fractional gamma ray abundance, halflife, detector efliciency and net b counts in the peak region. 3.6.2 Vecetation, Food and Garden Crons, and Fish 1 i The laboratory loads a maximum quantity of undried vegetation, food or _ l i 3-3 ( I
garden crop sample into a tared 3.5-liter Marinelli beaker and weighs. They then" count the sample for a minimum of 200 minutes, or until required LLDs shown in i GGNS ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved, in a shielded GeLi detector as described in Section 3.6.1. The laboratory loads as much as possible (up to the total sample) of the j edible portion of a fish into a tared Marinelli beaker and weighs. They diluted the sample with deionized water to weigh 3.5 kg and then count for a minimum of 240 minutes in a shielded GeLi detector as described in Section 3.6.1. s 3.6.3 Soils and Sediments The laboratory dries soils and sediments at a low temperature (less than 100 C), loads into a tared 1.0-liter Marinelli beaker and weighs. They then a count the sample for 240 minutes, or until required LLDs shown in GGNS ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved, in a shielded GeLi detector as described in Section 3.6.1. 3,6,4 Charcoal Cartridges The laboratory counts charcoal cartridges in a Marinelli beaker, with one to four cartridges positioned on the face of a GeLi detector and up to seven i cartridges on its side. They calibrate each detector for both top and side 4 positions and determine counting efficiency. They determine the Iodine-131 detection limit for each charcoal cartridge, assuming no positive results for Iodine-131, by utilizing smallest volume of air n: corded for a cartridge within the l Marinelli beaker. The laboratory counts each cl arcoal separately, ifIodine-131 observed in the screening count, by positioning on face of the detector. [ i l l 3-4 ./ {
3.6.5 Air Particulate ~ The laboratory stacks 12 to 14 (depending on calendar quarter) air t p particulate filters for a quarterly composite for each field station one on top of another. They then count the samples for at least four hours, or until required p LLDs shown in GGNS ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1 were achieved, in a shielded GeLi detector as described in Section 3.6.1. L 3.7 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry J-The GGNS ESP uses TLDs manufactured by Panasonic (Model UD-814). Although, these TLDs contain one lithium borate and three calcium sulfate phospor elements, only the calcium sulfate phospor element results are used for reporting purposes. [ The laboratory anneals the TLDs prior to shipment. Upon arrival at GGNS, personnel sort and place designated TLDs in a plastic bag (two TLDs/ bag) prior to placing in field. The laboratory reads the TLDs, upon return from the field, in a Panasonic Model UD-710 TLD reader. 3.8 Data Reportine Conventions The laboratory calculated mean of analytical results as folio vs: X = E Xi / n where: ._X =. Mean Xi => Individual sample results 1 = Number of sample results n 3-5 i-
They rounded calculated values by inspection of digits to the right oflast reported " digit, with values less than 5 rounded down and values greater than 5 rounded up. They rounded a reported value to an even number, when value equaled 5. The laboratory reported analytical results less than the 2 sigma counting error as. less than LLD calculated for that sample. They reported analytical results greater than the 2 sigma counting error along with associated 2 sigma counting error as a plus or minus (1) term. The laboratory considers calendar quarters as the following time periods: Ist Quarter January - March = 2nd Quarter April - June = 3rd Quarter July - September = 4th Quarter October - December = l l f I l 3-6 i
hya h M M M M M.D N kMN+@m@N $@+MO@&@4 m& p@MNMMS Y wyng n$ e 8 MfM m%mypw w@wW sm A s sm j M p g $m n y W MMi dMWM ushw:mn$s" a &. WF Q5 p dg nA &.gb gpp" n sw a e.!.-u h +a m',4a n, Qg & r.. pW ew e a#w a m" e.-Q W lN @1 4Bwa Mr - gy a 7 . p:6! a1yx' 'a. dMWh . & e. tqWp3 pon tlr.g,%<-- ? $, h,K 5 & MW p ' Wre # 7+1 / 4 s s a ?;p%uk. -fg A ..m:n@;;.n.Q p.aQ m,ag &n, l kbl?m d j i e&
- m <.
,x, N?Y'$m:n n4rM..e h+$ hfh:rh?h$p M. W ev., y M < s vu& g
- v. y h
' h(5hy,mNW &?$y ;:n. & &,c c u g+ 4? $h h l' M$ yp&f$$i ' we As?#, %;s< m nApMMl%y%pqgyrpS@ < s@4%g Q n w% % %y %,c;ug yV MQ&sgg~ s&qw V w n a:. e,' w w n &v p w w 7 ar W we .m 7m.pmn n .,o Q ^ aW% e mnn e s p ym: n5 -y a- @n +'ad
- A~2 jm $.-@ J @ 7 W.c y @ydg Qy -pA
's v pus - ~ i.Ny?g " m ~ ,t;' WQ.f g R.c u RNlm%al4 Y b,$WyMhQffh$%Q@Agg ?p@$p.4 ~@
- n. oay,p w
. :.a" Qwn Mu. ap q$%ggv n l @~ l j W W.y 4.g@W; X Q ggkgwyggmpw &.qgv ,7 \\y,e, - o mfMkbpapan--my([J@.kpmg [gg%%n $N q @e L %.cf' '> Y ($1 ~ v. gy$: h$hi gghy 1 'Tp. sgg"sf%n w,ww.ne,ggy%r4 w dtwMw m @un a ' M n, hw-
- 9 w-
- m#p.yw wa 74 f.
,N c x" q gly &g j,y n gp ggw>pupf.%pp$qq4,g' %gdh .My gg.jd 3-g g. 3 g, %pggym MVWi V y% Gn gy M% Q:: Ae ey" xa c ,jff;:;;. s c pay 4% ~ p' ; q y q q% p q ;g g g. Q Q -?y + ,s ~ x &g(n> gpwf gg qmp Wyy a& N 7,
- u x
c c ~ ,sm@~, A,e,Mf3% M4% en g a:q v s#.y pygg ye gggi gag e 4ua %y,dj L > wng 8 a w s s, BMQ&@9QQgg;; ?q;aguAu,$ &e
- . p#$pM, p; :P g
%42 . g 9p W ,n- >4x, ~gp ?> m%. ylK L.% p p m%. p mLpn.. se w; _ e %e.- w M@g@g%$p,%ggghMg %y
- og 4
, n:.;m'em,c e u.my n m.3 9 g4 g p,. m m f p g @ m,g@a%+m.p q m m,Mwyg,a w $m@g s 3,g py p$gQj, M@M fM W 4-g ^ + + gC
- gGgWA A
$w, gg =.g m.,s,(3..,, - ugg y a+ e
- n g
m, ae x p%~pyg.hq%ge 09%, A#yy' y p4.gd m; y c. a ~y, m c o
- A e%'
mo a v% gag a g.y #g%g. y. m.mp n n.s,acQ 7 + u ~ !.:4+mg _g mg 4,.9%Q; Q.n,s,a ; pp Q., w 3 g@y.n.m/.gm M. = .g w, a m a g g.0$E E W @g,.-pg oE N g-
- q m.. w.,c q _
w . ;g 3 , W %g@ryQy$ECTIOlf4 )\\ .y QQ. Q:p g ,,, _;3 y _ ng pyg t - g:n 1 g@W, W A R p4 Med WQ d gyp gg w g w g,y, &g vM p y-n<,, 3w-y yw 2pmngur y,pJw gy, egne m . + +, g s g7 4 4 MENVIRONMENTAL'SURVEILLANCEPROGRAM
SUMMARY
J % p myQ ,a;; <[n y gyg(' , w pq y,q,;m=ayg ggy ybyggg g g g m q 9 m 4y um
- n wn n
g o 3p_w y_v)py.mg.g,y ymp4g g g g g,y,g~,mg a g. g_ guy?Q4 o sw s ,<,,,g_m y qq mpqwgy,mp g y - y m m g
- m y
ggg g upx s y q ~ .p. M,
- ~
+ ,pp yy 49 e j. ,g. g y. g g 4.: g 4 m. g d am+m hp+qn %c Q Q m w;q @# k: 4 yd.8 y p wwsg ggp&.gmy n%_ g%gng 9:y:e yM mmmM g Q&g p4.. , g;q cq u gg 23g4 gg g s ydw%g@g n, Ow Wh m ,~ n. 4 xq1m y m m n e&%,:f:ne%m}ff mff;m%y&f vsl ~ g' "l ?f_fh )1 wM m Wg fffh j
- f5 V
Q y <) + e n u v m Wa Rp#
- 'm@ Q T 74@l&:
'&lm g p 3;f D y @@9l d Q;q c p y r Q Q Omf Q:Wg%i y.+
- M' M M M L %;n M
'g%g Ygp:ynyt p9 4 i y + :% s w.grQ; gj gt .:Qg /py;p qp y n q.::.mpn:s[ o&m py a, ^ .a;c . cw p-~ pxn y, &.gdyc. ~g 3, a,. u A . n>p .6.- x a n n ggg y.c ? w b!a 'Q (,.; h-h, g&; e- > ' lb'.b'3%. @g nup( p WW ' 'hrm'M 4 +*% hp~m" a7" [.( A.. h I/ M m q' v m'.q:$g i& o y-:%w y t ( a. Q'y& h 4 M
- s hga2 c
yi y l$m]: ?un/ 4:
- m. n n.
e%y@o. s a&n%auhn Qy,~ fh ~ J,:. )ay, w,g.a acw5 h 4i%w,n&.,w& a %+ g MM M~ W :.? w c v,G M~m, g w y num e as w m m u .,g. e h , ; y ;[jQ,R,?g,hhjgggspWw@esg Q((, [p .k fhh hh p j asg eg p e . m. b~ J, u'; , g,gf@+. w. Z h,6a M @ p y,g M. M e
- Md@1b G
MW4Wa yu ymT S m - w wfM. ~ t o ypA ge.. 7 n m < Op~uc,, b,, e-m>/ M,/ ;h,, y44 mm mk,ansg c. ..c, ,- ;1 ~.q, g,, w x : gg.kgphh q a m..+:s e u.w p ..sw 4m n;
- f ki$ s.h h f bhh h.hh
,.Nk: f;fb:
- w,, '
k~9 w %m w&pp & WWy&$n&@w%w/g%Qh.fg ~, & m w% .? ans%@p%g%QGQ s MM a , y. ,?gfyyhh t ' t;9 8k W k~fhkh &hh8 &n S. a n wn +, > %e,V! n' w> = %s;p& pnnw%~su-ag M @g p g p u s ;- p ~ g.
- g' q Q,
.n. m ngpg yy, ?' ~ ,w .m s - 4 Wg qqmgfggggg 'mM ~ , ff Q gg N M Q W Q L D 'y.. ~ pyg#gQeg ., 4.ps
- ?-
39 y A m u ow_ y..? q su M. g - p g;4,9, m gn g ny .3 g 6 14.h
- 4W;
- w
- y. s
.>3 wf p gp.e g f ur e s. 1 r w .w 4' , 4;My ~ y n. glr y 5 >
- [*f!W:
5 .l u. sx wy m yey4 i ~ 4 y@n 3 w w,, a%~m w j 4p.rt4 g, W, 3y . ::, b,G(i9 hkbd D a u ~e g$ R % mlm Uyl.$p p; e,c,-p ~ m$, g y e 3 y g g..u:n 4@4, 9 d hn ~ s __7y+ iu,, na. w ~ gg.g rw a an m8 a ~nwe sn y,ggg .g,__. y . e, gg
\\ 4.1 1993 Program Results Summary Table 4-1 summarizes required ODCM Specifications and supplemental ESP sample results for 1993. Table 4-2 lists indicator and control locations ) utilized to develop Table 4-1. GGNS personnel did not use values reported as less than (<) for determining indicator and control location ranges and means. Overall,1993 results compare to that encountered in previous years. e m 4-1 \\ t
k l TABLE 4-1 Environmental Monitorine Program Summary Name of Facility Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 Location of Facility Claiborne. Miscissioni Reporting Period January - December 1993 (County, State) b Indicator Locations
- Imcation with liighest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of -
Sample Type Type & Number LLD ( Units ) of Analyses . Mean ( F ) C Mean ( F) C Nooroutine a C [ Range 1 [ Range ] Results d Location Mean ( F) C l Range 1 Air Particulate GD 462 0.01 0.012 ( 358/360 )- AS-8 WR 0.014 ( 52 /52 ) 0.013 ( 102 / 102 ) 0 ( pCi/m3) [ 0 002 - 0.026 } l .( Sector E,0.6 mi) [ 0.004 -0.026 ) [0.003 -0.029) GS 36 Cs-134 0.05 <LLD .'N/A .N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 0.06 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Airborne lodine 1 131 462 0.07 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/m3) Inner Ring TLDs Gamma 61 (f) 17.8 ( 61 /61 ) . M-27 23.0 ( 2 /2 ) N/A 0 ( mR/Qtr ) [ 9.5 - 24.5 ) ( Sector M,1.5 mi) [ 21.5 - 24.5 } Outer Ring TLDs Gamma 60 (f) 17.9 ( 60 / 60 ) ~ M-49 20.9 (4 /4 ) N/A 0 ( mR/Qtr ) [l1.5 - 23.0 ] .( Sector II,4.5 mi ) {l8.0 -22.0 ] Special Interest TLDs Gamma 28 (f) 18.5(28/28 ) ' M-01 20.6 (4 /4 ) N/A-0 ( mRIQtr ) . [ 14.5 - 22.0 ] . ( Sector E,3.5 mi ) [.18 0 -22.0 } Control TLDs Gamma 4 (f) N/A N/A N/A 19.'8 ( 4 / 4 ) 0 [ 17.5.- 22.0 ] ( mR/Qtr ) Protected Area TLDs Gamma 63 (f) 25.3 ( 63 /63 )'. . M-69 53.1 (4 /4 ) N/A 0 ( mR/Qtr ) [ 12.0 - 69.5 } - ( Sector G, Onsite ) ( 31.0 - 69.5 ) 4 # s m .A - x A M ___,m m
.~ ~ TABLE 4-1 Environmental Monitorine Program Summary Name of Facility Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 Lecation of Facility Claiborne. Mississippi Reporting Period January - December 1993 i (County, State) l Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Locations '
- . Location with Illghest Annual Mean Control Iecations -
Number of ' ( Units ) of Analyses Mean ( F )
- Mean ( F )
- Nonroutine i
8 [ Range ) [ Range ] Results
- 1 Location d y,,n(y)c
[Rancei Cistern Water GB 24 4 4.8 ( 4 /12 ) McGee Cistem 4.8 ( 4 /12 ) 4.7 ( 7 / 12 ) 0 -[ ( pCill) [ 2.3 - 7.5 l . ( Sector A,0.9 mi ) [ 2.3 - 7.5 ] . [ 1 A - 10.1 }. 1-131 24 1.0 <LLD .N/A N/A <LLD 0 II-3 8 2000 270.0 ( l / 4 ) McGee Cistern 270 0(l/4 ) <LLD 0 [ N/A ] ( Sector A,0.9 mi ) [ N/A ] GS 24 Mn-54 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zr-95 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD
- N/A N/A '
<LLD .O Cs-134 15 ' LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 '18 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ba-140 60 <LLD -
- N/A N/A
<LLD 0 La-140 15 . <LLD N/A ' N/A - ' LLD-0- '4-3: i y
- TABLE 4 Environmental Monitorins Program Summary Name of Facility Grami Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 Location of Facility Claiborne. Mississippi Reporting Period January - December 1993 - (County, State) Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator lecations . lecation with Ilighest Annual Mean Control locations Number of a ( Units ) of Analyses Mean ( F ) C-Mean ( F ) C Nonroutine ' [ Range ] [ Range ] Results C Iecation d Mean ( F ) C I Range l Surface Water 11-3 12 2000 4026.7 ( 3 /.8 ). Discharge Basin 4026.7( 3 /4 )' < LID 0 (pci/1) [ 2560.0 - 5440.0 } ( Sector P,0.3 mi ) ' [2560.0- 5440.0 ] GS 36 Mn-54 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 30 <!l D N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co40 15 <llD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zr-95 30 <LLD-N/A N/A <LLD 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD N/A N/A < LID 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ba-140 60 -<LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 La-140 15 <LLD N/A ' N/A <LLD 0 Outfal1010 GS 1 Surface Water Mn-54 15 <LLD N/A ' N/A N/A 0 ( pCI/I ) Fe-59 30 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Co-53 15 <ILD N/A'- N/A N/A 0 CM0 15 <LLD. N/A' N/A N/A 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Zr-95 30 <LLD .N/A N/A N/A 0 Nb-95 15. < LID LN/A'- N/A N/A 0 Cs-134 15. ~<LLD N/A N/A ' N/A 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD . N/A: N/A N/A 0 Ba-140 60 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 12-140 15 <ILD N/A . N/A N/A 0 l '4-4 ' l ~ =
~ TABLE 4-1 Ensironmental Monitorine Program Summary Name of Facility Grand Guir Nuclear Station Docket No. 50 -t16 Location of Facility Claiborne, Mississippi Reporting Period January - December 1993 (County, State) Sample Type Type & Number LLDb Indicator Locations - lecation with flighest Annual Mean Control Locations - Number of - ( Units ) of Analyses * . Mean ( F ) C - Mean ( F) C Nonroutine . [ Range ] [ Range ] Results * - location d Mean ( F ) C [ Range 1 Well Water 11-3 8 2000 <LLD N/A N/A 270.0 ( l / 4 ) 0 -( pCi!1 ) [ N/A ] GS s Mn-54 15 <tLD N/A. N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-53 15 . <LLD N/A N/d <LLD 0 CW 15 <LLD N/A N/A. <LLD 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD-N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zr-95 30 < LID N/A N/A <LLD 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A (LLD 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD N/A N/A < LID -0 Cs-137 18 <LLD- ' N/A N/A. <LLD 0 Ba-140 60 < LID. N/A - N/A <LLD 0 La-140 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Milk I-131 2 Lo N/A N/A. N/A ( pCill ) . <LLD 0 GS 3 Cs-134 15 N/A N/A. N/A < LID 0 Cs-137 18 N/A
- N/A N/A (LIB.
O Ba-140 60 N/A- . N/A N/A <LLD 0 La-140 15 N/A N/A N/A <LLD 0 Vegetation I-I 31 108 60 -- <LLD_ N/A N/A <LLD 0 ( pCilkg net ) GS 108 Cs-134 Y20 <LLD' N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 80 ' <LI D N/A N/A . <l.LD 0 4-5.. 'i
TABLE 4-1 Environmental Monitorine Procram Summarv Name of Facility Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 ' Location of Facility Claiborne, Mississippi Reporting Period January - December 1993 (County, State) b Sample Type Type & Number LLD Indicator lecations location with IIighest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of ( Units ) of Analyses Mean ( F) C Mean ( F) C Nonroutine a [ Range ] ; [ Range ] Results
- Iecation d Mean ( F) C
[ Range 1 Fish GS 4 ( pClikg wet ) Mn-54 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 260 (LLD N/A' N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 130 <LLD N/A. N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 260 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134 130 <LLD N/A N/A <tLD 0 Cs-137 150 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Bottom GS 6 Sediment ( pCi/kg dry ) Mn-54 (f) 1202.0 ( 2 /4 ) ' Barge Slip 1202.0 ( 2 / 2 ) <LLD 0 [ l54.0 - 2250.0 } ( Sector Q,1.5 mi ) [ t54.0-2250.0 ] Fe-59 (f) 53.0 ( l / 4 ). Barge Slip ' 53.0 ( l / 2 ) ' <LLD 0 [ N/A ] . ( Sector Q,1.5 mi ) [N/A] Co-58 (f) ~ 143.0 ( l !4 ) Barge Slip - 143.0 ( l / 2 ) <LLD 0 [ N/A ]. ( Sector Q,1.5 mi) [ N/A ] Co-60 (f) 94 9.0 ( 2 / 4 ) Barge Slip 949.0 ( 2 / 2 ) <LLD 0 [ 267.0 - 1631.0 ] ( Sector Q,1.5 mi ) [ 267.0 - 1631.0 ] Cr-5I (f) -471.5 ( 2 /4 ) Barge Slip ' 471.5 ( 2 / 2 ) <LLD 0 [423.0 -520.0 ). . ( Sector Q,1.5 mi ) .[423.0 -520.0 } Cs-134 150 (LLD N/A' N/A <LLD 0 98.3 (4 /4 ) - Barge Slip 117.5 ( 2 /2 ) . <LLD 0 Cs-137 180 -[ 64.0 - 137.0 ] . ( Sector O,1.5 'mi ) - [98.0 -137.0 1 6 ~ ~ . ~.
-~. ~ = TABLE 4-1 Environmental Monitorine Program Summary Name of Facility Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No.50-416 Location of Facility Claiborne. Miseissippi Reporting Period January - December 1993 (County, State) Sample Type Type & Number - LLD b l - Indicator locations Location with flighest Annual Mean Control I ocation: ' Number of 8 ( Units ) of Analyses Mean ( F) C - Mean ( F) C - NonRoutine [ Range ]1 [ Range ] ' ResaltsC Location d Mean ( F ) C [ Range l Basins A and B GS 2 Sediment ( pCi/kg dry ) Cs-134 150 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Cs-137 180 ' 22.0 ( l / 2 ) - . Basin A ' 22.0 ( l /1 ) N/A 'O - I N/A 1 -( Sector R,0 3 mi )- ' { N/A ] Unit 1 GS 4 Sewage SIudge Mn-54 150 - I53.3 ( 4 /4 ) . Unit 1 Sewage Plant 153.3 ( 4 /4 ) N/A 0 ( pCilkg wet ) [36.0 -.270 0 } - ( Sector A,0.3 mi ) [36.0 -270.0 ] Co-60 150 425.0 ( 4 /4 ) . Unit i Sewage Plant 425.0 ( 4 /4 ) N/A 0 [ 129.0 - 807.0 )'._ ( Sector A,0.3 mi ) [ 129.0 -807.0 ] Cs-134 150 <LLD 'N/A <LLD N/A 0 Cs-137 180. ' 26.0 ( l / 4 ) Unit 1 Sewage Plant 26.0 ( l/4 ) N/A 0 f N/A } ( Sector A,0.3 mi ) { N/A 1 Bucksnort Camp GS .I Venison Meat ( pCilkg wet ) Fe-59 260 <LLD. N/A. N/A N/A 0 Zn-65 260 <LLD' N/A' N/A' - N/A 0 Cs-134 130 <LLD .N/A N/A N/A ~ 0 Cs-137 130- -<LLD 'N/A ' N/A N/A 0 4-7
. ~.. - ....~. ,.. =. -.. -,. -...-... ~... TABLE 4-1 Environmental Monitorine Program Summary Name of Facility Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 Location of Facility Claiborne. Mississioni Reporting Period January - December 1993 (County, State) - r a GB = Gross beta;I-131 = Iodine-131;11-3 = Tritium; GS = Gamma scan. b LLD = Requiredlower limit ofdeteition based on Grand GulfNuclear Station ODCMSpecification Table 4.12.1-1. c Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. ' Fraction ofdetectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (I-). d Locations are specified (1) by name and (2) sector relative to reactor site. Non-routine results are those shich exceed ten times the control station value. Ifno controlstation value is available, the result is considered non-routine ifit erceeds ten times the preoperational valuefor the location. l LLD not definedin GGNS ODCMSpecification' Table 4.12.1-1. 4. m. m ~ - s
TABLE 42 Indicator & Control Locations Sample Type Locations Total Total & Type of Analyses Samples p. Indicators - AS-4 GJOE' 52 52 ca. - Gross Beta, I 131; 4-Gamma AIR AS-5 TC* 51 51 ea. - Gross Beta, I-131; 4-Gamma AS-6 RS 51 51 ea. - Gross Beta,1-131; 4-Gamma AS-7 MT 52 52 ea. - Gross Beta,1-131; 4-Gamma AS-8 WR 52 52 ea. - Gross Beta, I-131; 4-Gamma AS-10 HR* 50 50 ea. - Gross Beta, I-131; 4-Gamma AS-11 BB* 52 52 ea. - Gross Beta, I 131; 4-Gamma ) Controls - AS-1 PG 50 50 ea. - Gross Beta, I-131; 4-Ganuna AS-3 61VA 52 . 52 ca. - Gross Beta, I-131; 4-Gamma L Indicators TLDs Inner Ring. . M-16,17,19 20,21,22, 23,25,27,28,41,45,86, 92,93,94 61 61-Gamma. q Outer Ring M-36, 40, 4 7, 48, 49,50, 51,55,56,57,58,59,88, 89,90,91 60 60-Gamma SpecialInterest Areas M-01, 07, 09,10, 33,. 38,39 28 28-Gamma Control - M-14 4 4-Gamma Indicators Protected Area' F M-61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67,68,69,70,71,72,74, j 76,77.81 63 63-Gamma
- Not required by ODCM Specifications 4-9 s
TABLE 4-2 Indicator & Control Locations I Sample Type Locations Total Total & Type of Analyses Samples WATER Cistern . Indicator - McGee 12 12 ea. - Gross Beta, I-131, Gamma; 4-Tritium . Control - Willis 12 12 ca. - Gross Beta, I-131, Gamma; 4-Tritium Surface . Indicators - Dov.nstream Ms. River 12 4 - Tritium; 12-Gamma Discharge Basin 12 4 - Tritium; 12-Gamma . Control - Upstream Ms. River 12 4 - Tritium; 12-Gamma . Indicator - Outfall 010* 1 1 - Gamma Groundwater . Indicator - Arnold Acres 4 4 ea. - Tritium; Gamma . Control - Port Gibson City 4 4 ea. - Tritium; Gamma MILK Indicator - None N/A N/A . Control-Alcorn State University 3 3-Gamma; 2-I-131 VEGETATION . Indicators - Sector J Garden 36 36 ea. - I-131, Gamma Sector R Garden 36 36 ca. - I-131, Gamma . Control - Sector K (Alcorn State Umversity) 36 36 ca. - I-131, Gamma FISil . Indicator - Downstream Ms. River 2 2-Gamma . Control - Upstream Ms. River 2 2-Gamma
- Not required by GDCM Specifications 4-10
~._ TABLE 4-2 Indicator & Control Locations e i. 1 Sample Type Locations Total Total & Type of Analyses . Samples 4 Indicators - Hamilton Lake SEDIMENT (SEDHAM) 2 2-Gamma 2 - Barge Slip (SEDBAR)* 2 2-Gamma Basin A* 1 1-Gamma Basin B* 1 1-Gamma Control - Upstream Ms. River 0-(SEDCONT)* 2 2-Gamma Indicator - Unit 1 Sewage '. WAGE SLUDGE Plant Sludge (Outfall 010)* 4 4-Gamma - . Control - None N/A N/A VENISON Indicator - Bucksnort Hunting Camp (Sector N) 1 1-Gamma Control - None N/A N/A'
- Not required by ODCMSpecifications
) t i l l .i 3 e 4-11
- -U - - m
- m. m$wN$$ s,L,i MW. V.,$1 R
&, w,O Wm$&r{ ' n$ U ' l'h,n, Wc 7 N,,D&$ffl' L'. ?u g.&m[& &Qy&' i 5 &m] b % x +h: w w , n w www + W V ) % ?:,.
- s 5,.
s. ~. w,h&,.] j.m.m:.WfS.!D&? m&y. W?M hW . T,Nh +' yh",qw+$?l+:, &
- .0 ' e' %A
.A ~L mr an w - . v
- m. m mm m n
n u .,.~ -a Q-Q. k h,_a y w w;p:#,, ra
- -> w N
'. [e,i kh9. w' h. M. h h '( f f i-i
- r,
' e' V HY," 7 x. 6he,v, ,W; MW .o.c ; 3)<y,, ,,t ,Q. ~ *
- M. M. A..w m, P:6.V M
,Q + n - 1 1 .a - < Ke2%.. %p 4^ i a,,4 p e 9..pc - > m g er >x.9 Og -lf: s f3'a,'r adj:
- 3
, ~. ..3 t j g ?: ,~y,.. 1.., 9, J.m - m w. _t 4 a. s - v ,'e ~ o v:,, 4.. \\...,._*7 e _4 g a%+ - wp,n mr rs-k.hk + -- ; h '#?
- '.$d b
.,4,'n,e. X 1, s.~ c: e.m e r s m, s, u - j.g g> qgg , q w, ; .,y d t a y p.3.,. g.g) egc s g'q,\\v .v.[. s
- ~$
~ r) ...a. 1 ,,q ;. ,.[. ~ .,, w'..,,, yc. I. .}r. }i,j.g r (~,.,._ 3, O w w.a , ) I. ,i.., +
- m' ',,
- O l,,
_+ w'
- y
, ',,q ;. 4g'..P,y ,e ../,. g*i4 ,3,Y. r c y 's a + e L V.t p 'u-s r y , x 1 y, s u-5 gg y 9: i q',f ?:f y -n- ,c - p. 7 .W3 : ' i! g ?? 1,.
- * ' ' ' ~
d V. } .;' q<a, V t e s y .r i ( r; ,s p,u. d,., u .n r <> J.q:p i.4;y. a i r s p < > 4...t'y ,',s s:
- se 1
5 y i.., j S 3.,..A -r ,p-. sc 6 t w 4.,"yy,i,,.,r..g;p. p ,n.s' m.a*' 3 c.y s -y ( y., ~ a v', p, ~ a a v 3..,m._' rL,-+ l.; 4 g Q.
- .j.
t e n y m' Y WW j_ y.. t di,Ni w'y ,y ,ja'y y g p 4 s + w'q,N.%g&Q$,%.,.r.c: < 0 '& ' gI w w ')
- ; yl..'; x'l s
..-d v V &p..p:p, 4 2 ., m,g u 'y u 3. 'n. ; ,., g (s - y " me .y.. ,, s_ q.y . st g pg. %,? ) Qw. g u__ l; &lslh j y_ w; H, &p:y;l ';y% u t &f"p w;. ~~,My.Oy"- l , q , y7 i Q, X - W, eGi jin nQ b i e w p we, a n w y',g,' a', a n, .sg,. .3, ge ~r m m; y, a> n ~s ., ist> a v. p. +,7 [, ) ' ggMQyn'g%w@Qlu~8 f$n.4y3 ,zQ
- Q.s.9 QF3 4 Typwg W" ' 'n.Qa W 3 Q
[',, u?.. a mnm 9 n. Q a w .y w . nm.::w gaw g ..w.y c.vpp~, ; ;pm,y grg.n,s, e{.g ; y m; > s yp: gm.g m qg. - m.m, n v m, , i . y.y b m ~ v Q lWY~, % ' < x f%p& ::,4j@ma.. r%p,.m mo r. . g ;
- x c
g a w<m y y r QW,sgu1 ;., f g,y 1 4 i x7 lt.0, ?: A. uu v.$ &f2l% Ny -&~m gm+lryEW n e 5 s:n; am s. a ~e W @ W h b'g= N M gs L q QQM %yp%qm e-s M:nWVn:1, s1 s "s , msp@m yy* Qj$ejQ$;;. % @%%e;. @) .. l eu . Q$ h. Q ~ 'm l e. m y.ww +i" r c. Q/ i o v ' h Ay q,as. t
- 's.,.,& c..A, a' m
et 7 et it %r 3,, .4. -.n,~
- 7. g.i x9 g
t b4 1y e;f:N"+g.. ^ ' I.) r-4' ;N,b - $ p 'y + M9 0 ' y'k p@R01 g$ Y 4,j h,g.[3 e! cy c y :::Q'4,, .N,/j gp t, C/, L e y c f@ - i wum,4.n+ %;: . " Q w,;e, n, y y c3* wwp m.r 4 g ny p a. u m ma w.y.u,.v _ . w. m. w. >. u m Q Q, j,)&. p' g, u gyyly;m p.ff. (, ap.. myg r .:3: / LQ_,'.g
- w, a i i A L.. jh %
"v f Q~f.. p f.pQQ .. a.. a rup y a_ v x z ~y,,. 3 t u s <f '.p N - g p v 7c,;q <~p@g.q. a,- w: s r g.wMm(tf p 3;p % 9.y: 'a.:.4 N@.h y::a fyr i y. g. m,, g' 4 4' ^" ' ?? at 3 seg,m,,,q.x m, s.y M x y gr -5 3 3 i >'~'[[ Y . l' % j' f E 3' - 3 gr. a gg .gg ~w&,4.$ ~ SQ lR. Wy&.:.yf Y' W'/-{,$ h f + f y;, i 6" }~ \\ 4 s m- - a z ng. dsDTIDN'535 MM,sp my_wegad.mg2..w n y y ,a ~ v o n.v. g , a... ys n n ~< ~, t qo%q,3Maes.ggg.U MpN D!M N n . g pma am,g g w n - - w . d'M ;y/A,g g j Q 2 s r_ 4 ,e NN ~ + m..w: >.u%. $@% Nf sd~.b.A d.~yg N.. UA.. L. ITY,C.ONTROIli),AT.A,,V." 4 L KM "'+L. r 3, e y.,s n&& WQA 9; 9 i, w m,M Vg 1 eem.v.wwew y wn::My.g;.w c i p W W 7 M *,g_@WNSA W W"_% t r u v - .s .a. ,.; c . ~ <Ws r._ ~yp a :..: n +
- a
- .. e; p 4.o<
s v, v .sa WQW r g wi 3 - %eg g
- -v
.i. ', en s>
- ./,, /", W 4p g.) &
.'-v.. ,g s:M g w'l'2 Q;g w b f gT }K ,,.f.%,r.
- t AN
- yb n c'- r4 n. a K QLyn: - fn n,h; n. g p% /J:: ' y", -a&;Q' n n:. a.,v,p)w.. n > ug m &., W:en q;. e w.w v
- { g 3,4._K,r.p f p Q. :g;-
a ,1 3%p Wq + # 3pE i..,?. 2 e q d ,n., ,q.,;.g Q,,,p +S. e 'Qr y y.r, JJ ,i 4 c 19
- a, f, e ;
e ,Y g j y g ,e p,c 3 s pk ,, ~};g::-QQ g;g3,:gy%.g gg,w. ggen m u+ y j< - Au ,, + lh"Q2 y j qg gw.pgQhJfi&y-g; j g;$ q p q;;. V &g %;. h^g .WW c &. W' M y s a a -3 c, . 7 g.~ ggy n4 m.j w.g;We,Fn.x. x@ g g h en .s w sy y w r s .n n m m. nd:, y w ~w3&w-L x qn,u: g me
- c 1
e m n#y s s qu g. .c;- 4 e~ r.- i.:g w A.rg .~.a -m e ,c y. p$ p Mu m e a v, -. m y, a;w@.; .m-yg m y gn g. % 1s.p.yy e gg. tr a.A . ~..y f<n - pwpe,.yw>-~4% u, m: ; f~ m.2 w, mc
- (..
p y .s +~ w n? y. ~yyy v "w-%.A ~ ., ; a r r. n ~, - m %ys.. n :4 n; .:..; x t w-Y;i v ?- f. .;Y 1: ^ m;.y nyy%ne,s rw +c.,,,y m p g w . g m w p.g
- ne.
? 4 <:q 74 .gy@. @2P. 4'% w., 4 p -. 6 : i M w Op :m yM;p,t K P $p#r.vma v cx _ A '; ,.. + 1 ypL '.;.- + s t 1 Q[ q.f s '.c{-f ~ q.9.p ; m} f%'Q ;g }Q L'ga.h y m. - n:/x.pm.3 a:m.. s. p}& y_m{W@w, - n gMi. .\\r r ~., = nuJ w .- yy u r y, u n ,7gc.T k.'a#yn"3',M, w W. 3 ;dcg j.]+' f C.M ~ r 6kE A
- 1-4
- dr.,
~ w, up.g,p (b -M .E U f'M h. g@ y [$ e@g )y.[.Ne h,w%[M.
- i i
.M,.. c f. M9 d s - Q' ^t nr 4 -s s. w. es yw . cue .q m. p[ h ; h, ymyu.pA,. y - W. jj ymg4,g, myg n ~., m n.m%ws p.dxN., P. m. eJ .H x-- myy , won n m-y n; + nu i ... w-h, p w. w+ 7, s c vu s f ~*ym e 3 H A ,*A.s._L'.X' 1 % T.7, r ' f"r,f. _ly.' ll,_ A., Ag p f p., ,j -"A l. Vi t 1 m.: v 1 l.Q,:.,( *f'._ Of,. p % sf%%( p g',._. h A{ % ws.Q y 'rl'.}y;gth m&;y f ,,.,j Y _. y _ . Q:p,N Q[.y , _g y r ~. g ,,a, ' i, g., < A_ yy; ,, y -yg g:g. p %,>ag g + m ;d h f pq 3:yc qW: + f ff -m(l s :.:: a ay wr w u. nw m&, p n. @f ~f.-h n >w&f;,.kfg / w%m. %y m, kgf*A.. Ll, w@}c 3klt 3' l :~ &f, - f ~ V ,g;; ^ WMM, w~; he g.= myn.. x m; w i w s, w n . ws.. m.g %' m-,,.[, ce a.,.n,. n,, w a, y,p 4 -,s .ai s
- m.. ' a p6. 4.;. gy
.,.,,Q 4,.., c ~,. M : y %.g'w' 9' u 4;n. J aM.... r.',g' . (g i .d m'l .c [9 gA 'g N' t:L. Q; 3,,, v y ; A,-. g ,X y 4/ y yg gg )g; 9
- &y'y t
J.g $w h 'gp, g:p ~?; O q) '2
- .e G
y z a
- e, w / M:p w
.up p 2 (, 3' ( .m.V--. y'Q.,, f t t I s 9 - w. L QlP Q(, '
- QP,l'p, p#['- ~ %..;:h qfg' &c'."f "dl:;^M.^h
'J Mr C .fc -W' .}hp"[.'. s %s. o" ffXm, . -L^ g 3 ~ % ; t; t' 1, %g M4 r, h ,?@[q i y. h. .c .p~. n? k-3 h h l ^ n. g.% ~,y -+- w.p.u. +..,: .upe a v,.c. - -s. vy, xc.Mm&.u:9.r mx y ,, < z ag e < ; y.
- n;4,,3 ;. r; n
- &,p,
.< h. y,', _3y O.,a s yg;9 ;@..,,;a y/., .w i .3 .jn w .n t.f 2 f4gy j ww*m qy ,S h.;r.. .,4p g-y-s a3 .; s, p, ' < g_ + i s, r a ,9 sjQ j s - ,, T 2 sn++ + c s y k n; s__,:q a " 8 3: -~f_> . h.1
- Y
's" .. g w,' g~ u k :Y@' gp, g mm;, 9
- ,_ c -
+ x u: +,',..? ,- mc :w ,n - ~ x. em o, - p4 y a a r m{ w n y. .g m\\ w r.f.r,m{' -[ 4 1 Y. J ~.' g .r = Y i s s ..g., e &, '. c it. 9 ): g;g}p G. e 'g ..az. J - C ~' 2 + e qw (~ .,d-2 4 /! hh . n s. - w' - 534; ' s.] a yt t.- c ' s rit; V ,:M.,',;q.J,~JG M r D # p -9% m L y ~w n. 9jt %:, y"; ' : %M.M.M'
- M
,,L...s n. t 4p y,_,. 4 t 1 - - q w'6-- <Wr f 1-4 4 a ? r
- g., y i
/ 1 .y j
.r i 5.1 Crosscheck Program Results 9 ESI System Chemistry analyzed EPA crosscheck samples for GGNS. Attachment I contains these results. ESI System Chemistry's analysis participation, shown in Figure 5-1, indicates consistent, valid reported data based on acceptable sample results that fall within the three standard deviation range. 5.2 Duplicate Samples Attachment I contains duplicate samples, identified by suffix "GG" accompanying the laboratory number, submitted by GGNS to ESI System V Chemistry for analysis. Attachment II contains duplicate TLDs submitted to { the Waterford-3 Dosimetry Section. Summary below identifies sample media duplicated. Sample Media Sanmles Duplicated Table No. f Cistern Water 6 2.1 - 2.4 Groundwater 2 3.1 & 3.2 Surface Water 10 4.1 - 4.6 Vegetation 12 5.1 - 5.3a Milk 2 6.1 Fish 2 7.1 & 7.2 Sediment 3 8.1 TLDs 12 4 (Attachment II)' GGNS personnel's review of all duplicate sample results indicates consistent, valid reported data based on similarity of results. i 5-1 er y c
i F FIGURE 5-1 1 EPA Intercomparison Study l l EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Results for 1993 Unacceptable ** (i Analysis) / / // 1 i I. Acceptable * (22 Analyses) f L f
- Mthi 5e Three Sta$kard 3evhAbo$ R$hej 1
- Outside the Three Stataia1 Deviation Range l 5-2 v
1 ->Kf -..yD 'W:i .w,, nw r r.7. q r --Y... - Y,.. 3 m $~Y'YY hg!y M W R y 4a.v.;a, %y. W <h'**#GN, ^> w m
- w
,q M.M.. &.. %w$$$bbhY? N c.ylM$q '?m.2.-W /' 7 %>p ? bhk hh h
- kYYh YYYl g
M.,h.WmMAQ 4 R@ %) W Mi y-y ', _P ' .~ r .,mp: n 'o e., [n sL m s u -~ e m p f[ ,(lf M.;[-I j; q. "' se -h 6 'bi.
- s. w wrv O4.
V &%h NNO," D kkkk.ni-( Qg rgsjp.: W $ ;, 3(g' - i..Jj n. .g , > fkh OW C.34h w w$:N,$$( ^ ~ ?gj' Al< ? $i )N, '.s 't %. l)' f
- f,
?%s,,Y hN n. ga s n M y $ 2:x3 m ~7 t %g,;us.a s f,w,t m 4. C
- u. g p M :-
,j$ -..m v g;; N v
- n.',-
n.: s Ju w v e%,,x.4 y3 ~ s h@W~ n.nn ;)au:&e[]f +n n - e. og r
- i
- _ q a %'y %
a y.w; y a ' 1 .w -M0, e. 4 u: r.. - sSE ' " .y ^ < wV ,,n, L,,q R$p w;$::ss,' W ~ r-la ~a }>- g gf g., r.7~', 2,l D m. s a E Y,- '? o .,.y. Sc ~ ,b* h
- c. y/..:,, 9 3
4., a g.>&.g: i Q'y.. m.-Qt, n c f blt 7: L l fs !? w 'y,$ g&'* ('.zY Ul t L l"y ? V ?. g' &)W ~ y g, ; y_ %',. eg ', > g',,-,g@. n s s .f. ?}" ',[ .. qY l ^O] y K. ,,mu s W g.[f..q f. ? O'$Y::l h t y? o v v.. a ;.'r,?. " c',7c .m?. _gx, ; e g,1t,' p 7 r .r, p s, ,c ~w i e
- p;.
,m> < "i, s 1 y g m. j n 4 '.s.L, < y. 4 s. g ~y r ml =I (
- A s
(,' ' i f./
- F;,,,.\\
n q.: .g Y ' W h* W'y Y ) E$: ty c .y/jT.d TM + i w. y r* in. , ; j-?, ~ v _ % c f.' ',s f' y 5 ^ >l }. y'- ,,[, ! b '. 4 "j/,g @, g f,,,, I i. 4 YlC,,., ' ' "4s W-e G ~ 4 t .>gj, j 'W ' 3' 4 1 s T I f - p j +f [.( am' i yp g. -. s gj ( A.9 - u '[., y )- g ,w ,.)ff g 9;3 [+ c + k ih h ' g, g r ~,4. w K("j /g. g.y ias n - a pn ;g,e. w m.Mpfw, ,qy ,3 s %e w[s.4*wg,k Qff[ ! v.u/ -,. w w.x g&g c - N,
- N I
9 m,k k % 3 j kb [4..[,up.c.M/ 4 ~p Qn'qfd$Il .w Vff 94 pM k$h ~ MM% ,w gg g$.v. NMk ap, . sw s. r QF i' m s. ^ %.t 7 J WN g Ap.9%glb} "" j&;?plp f k?f 0'p gg(p .gy R: q h., W .f '&.,f. _k
- f W;
m g,;vm9.mmy.,.,N.. u.../ ;..m., g% w\\ r n. y m,-~s. e + .1.. -, m.s y
- g. e,'.
. m.s(k c v.qqm _ y w$$hy/ Mww_m0Md DMk '% "' MO e:w y 4 c
- .P' 5,9 (
%>% a'v,g'jM NMi AYRdh@i,, @y 1 . w~. N jy'@m. '.v b 4,$.xy4W m,t f6 s nw'n.0;~e~ W q twgy n a MW n-n 4 1 + 'S w'- en; g n;6 p;R, / M.p ^ ',V a m 4 n 2-s yt / Y 9 F], 6'y,, .fi 2dik Qf y
- +
2 ..,.'@.3 qP(,M i Wg;a g,e( g y , gg - %..y;. n qu @,p i ~gK ,y w j, g 4 W
- w. m ly..y
...,g - s.% Q%. w& 3% M. .m
- g.a i'y..,-,
- .w,.7 e
.tWpyg.RW %wx;,;,gg.m# 'jn n x; A 2 i,,., w m%g.gg ,4 +, 4p v , vm&ww. r w WZj Q me p +4 m y n g 4g v t C. s . y,an M.g v. f j f 3-4 y ga f n,3.,.nlhgggM;h h y 4 gg w > p.y Ao 3 i he p. 4 g w %a p 4. w9, s ~ m F, t, ., g. wg gh s..m. .w p ,c ..?
- n; w>
,a* m u m -m gp. y. ,e ,v' ,Q:.. J 3.- .,.pnm q gx w. .p %gq[ gy ; {@, J,! L. u.jp _,.j/'d).,y '., M.,.. @;. w' i r c 'Wy:4 ap.. ,,' f. 43.,-- As e 5-s s z, a o,p.:..Q s !m, p y'a.Q T4 lc F.,. ^ ".. h' i',&j. %. w w. j. 4 J s y" .,7 w + -t - / - ' ;g a,,. 4., [m,,. h ',. ggg[q g y @ ;<. )hbkl. j.kh*4 e f.h4 hI g'(y go g [Q.',.I'm. M w + y ym.: > w,s pg w b I 2SE 50 m ~, ~, nn%w%n.ggc.,hgyu-y ,ami + 7,.rp, a w n.,m,, 3= g.z". y MfMn -www rewc. yy n' , 9.32y% s 'w mc. _..... m.i. w z.g d 993!SAMPilNG AND ^NALYTICAk. RE_$d$fS,Md,.m.y p$k,ib .$dc,;g d M - q, . i t.., u m w h +. '.Am.gQ' e m- > c Wv m m% e 1-y;p&.g g y: : 3 u N< v x v n w - r( v ~ 7_y 3 v. w'#.M> v; Qfhhh\\? ?a ..p# +- .x. c.~-.
- n. c-u n
< f,. 4 ~hW ,l .yy _ 0+l L % g n 4l $ h Q & d h &.q.gggrg!.
- &gg q
&M N, kl@&#%Qh&f5h,& &w@@w g + y 3 4 l &f;y Q' g
- 'A r
h n m uw%m %ga'fh,,' oy u ~ My QlGMng y; ,%Ql y ~. u) a 3.u q yptw ns .,. +q
- +
nap:s ,,w .,s Mh;P,w w. @,9 %w n&,(w o. v w 9:, gy m2 -:M.o,' f Tib 0.m.
- . s i r-
@a. w fM4 4 - M N -24 a.q na @s + a SQgjpg( c? ' y:gn;%. me s Q s'[ jg;f f '.9.JL., 3
- h 4 S, T Q,h4 Am v
Qg%g@, JMuppM e i-t r A 4 &.w edy 4 r a% + s 32 m m. o ggy . if:f h.m m s - v, n h9f.9 2 n yq p.4: f g m, ew w;f.gg ,y'",M,g n, 4:a p 4.y u :.8;4 m y% v t~ E C (; r n,,, y. st , &. !L.] 4 p '? ty1 's a hm x; .,+ ,&y.-e m: ..,ng w. .~3. s r r - .y% yu.y;n.q,ys' 9. w ggn z ng'x nn,1.y;p,. yang 4g. qv 4 <m -. y. -n z. .w- -* i ' y w+ ;+ v w, n q% p4$'@ye mp9& mgyCu sv -gen;- ,s o Cf .,, n e,; 7.) z. s k6-w <.M" Q'm. ' h[$, q NMl[M,.j,tg M W- - 3 m t 4 U i $e w'd 7,; 7 ..a ,,p. M J' 'j .3 . d.QMN>O -Q " i g n y @ gemm%m??Q.hMd., G y %n..ro s 57 s 6M , fj G w n @ @s. M. N. iy-- 4 ' t mm aw -um% 3# + Qy .h h$?kfl f, w_,'nl ll ,~ ~ Y,, l l:'_ 0 rw c ! mn gyra.pf masnm , q;q&n . e n,COj@w.h c m y w %p M yiggg y' gugp u g.~g%w%n_ md:g 9 y "; .n, dg c. ~u; n gg 3 y > by, AA* nJ.3 ghya%p4,q%rgA,Wga% p q w(; ~ A ;f e ,:.1. f a m any.t! n .4 .y u,h y. s
- ~,' yp q ?n.
.w w v an' ] <Qu g;W M :x.. rt. o p m m'Aif: .m An'v. Af 4 k.- 'y,i s ' -[ nn, . wwa y e',. ;e. i ,q'- m.' & ( h~,., % w,q. + 7 t w LT a ..s g y n yd ,63 f f Q, ;y?Q,p/C'.f. ' M6 -. &,' c m h,.' [. -,J y,n < s % [l., 'n.2,b y v ',k n.y WQ 8 Ayy &W,Y e
- ys.A idh.,, 6@ llWiMfMI M,, Md-Q * $ g 4 a-
-m y ':i" 4 YNMOi?,' YdhpMg [% ^w%s ;. 1kM&a' ., ?
- J t
M Auw %gp bP y.f('.,r p ' gy-M.m* y.N hr8 f 3 J '[.,,, a.m,..
- p. b h;)5@.8T
^ .W ' <* Y , :,g _ >
- L y-y p
. - t w 1.. ,s,,.r 3,y t@- j 4 -i.[i., y n ,y f o, ,e c1 % s'Q' a, A %. _ g' o, $*q "Y u,,g (t .w t. Y @%g,\\ .Y d,c-g 3? 4' LQ ;i.y%'.~;; pd af.[f.? 'W'M'(( 1 },- W JP x l' ,.m,.S } ,g-4 f))> c....,.Q q. a dy y T/ ede ) M:< $W NeA' 2 If t rf M. ga r >l > 1.m. g j ,. m peu d _M a %, kh NM, w,, M hf['yh[m(,9Nk {.kMb,.j > Q h fp e ..% a:c d,};, j.ph:-.T,,*,ffh%$e %m t y - t l m %, ]w, (,, i/C w . r., g.m a >-$f,4 4 + s' a . w -_A g i.7k , e. / ..f y i e.o g; Q m, ,.n L pi h g.y, n, j, _ :f %g 4 (. +5 $ = 3 a +n 4 .3 p. f ',Q.j J g j g,, w +1 g s '. " " u m} Q. ; g"e ( %.s 8W nw mx. a s + ~ - h. , ( n. I, ' y'Qgg y' ge~.y u, :s,mm 1 i 1 (:4
- r; q'
a ; s % "~,. <+Y.
- . gc..
g _4w m n s V'* v.M f.v..f.s. i ' \\ x z r s s Q:(
- 1 4
< n 3,- a u y,-- ..,.z
- . w
- t
~w 4 % ~ 1y,](JgMgg . i 4,. .m - w% u q q-g. ~ v ~ i
- $ l l
y W,.. d s x. Q;; <. m.q h ..e,--w_ . y#Mm, W' h-g wy a as 'J g N. lxq _ :. [w'p;:(%m, ,~,, ~s ' Y4 u n d:' ?? % %ra < ',,, ; x.D n Y3m s s& a n'g w h Y Q 's f; ^ k: w[ w, n. As ,, w.~ -a ~ a m,
6.1 1993 Data Attachments I and 11 present data obtained by ESI System Chemistry and Waterford-3 Dosimetry Section on samples collected from January through December 1993. ESI System Chemistry provides data in monthly progress j. reports. Waterford-3 Dosimetry Section provides TLD data in quarterly reports. 1 Data presented in Attachraents I and II compare to that encountered in preoperational and previous operational years.. l 6.2 Lower Limit of Detection j ESI System Chemistry routinely counts lower than the maximum LLD required by ODCM Specification Table 4.12.1-1. Factors such as unavoidable 1 small sample size, background fluctuations, presence ofinterfering radionuclides I or other uncontrollable circumstances cause ODCM Specifications' LLDs to be 1 unachievable in some instances. However, GGNS personnel's review of 1993 1 l results indicates acceptable LLDs within required ODCM Specification limits. 6.3 Reportine Levels GGNS' review indicates that no samples equaled or exceeded reporting levels for radioactivity concentration in environmental samples, as outlined in ODCM Specifications Table 3.12.1-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, due to GGNS effluents. Therefore,1993 results did not trigger any Radiological - Monitoring Program Special Reports. l 6.4 Sampline Deviations The ESP missed three air samples required by ODCM Specifications during i 1993 due to sampling equipment malfunction. Two malfunctions involving a blown fuse at air sampling station AS-1 PG occurred during the sampling periods 6-1
q i l l ofJuly 27,1993 through August 3,1993 and August 10,1993 through August 17, 1993. The remaining malfunction which involved a loss of flow occurred at air sample station AS-6 RS during the sampling period of September 14,1993 through September 21,1993. GGNS personnel replaced these air sampling units upon discovery of the equipment failure. The ESP lost five TLDs required by ODCM Specifications during 1993, due to vandalism or flooding from the Mississippi River. Other TLD programs experience losses of this type. In 1993, GGNS personnel calculated a 97% (155 of 160) recovery rate for required ODCM Specification TLDs, which compares with other TLD programs. The ESP did not include milk sampling within five miles (8 km) of GGNS in 1993 due to unavailability. Therefore, GGNS personnel continue to sample the - Alcorn State University Control location semiannually until such time that milk - samples become available within five miles (8 km) of GGNS. They collected vegetation samples to monitor the ingestion pathway, as specified in ODCM Specifications Table 3.12.1-1, because of milk unavailability.- GGNS personnel conducted all other ESP activities required by ODCM - Specification without exception. 6.5 Radioactivity Not Attributable To GGNS The GGNS ESP detected radioactivity attributable to other sources twice. These include the 25th Chinese nuclear test explosion in 1980, and the radioactive : plume release due to reactor core degradation at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986. 6.6 Sampline Relheation Vegetation and milk sampling locations did not change in 1993c Therefore, 6-2 1 O
= GGNS personnel did not identify any new locations or report circumstances of a unavailability in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report. 6.7 Comnarison To Federal and State Programs GGNS personnel compared GGNS data to federal and state mori oring t ) programs as results became available. The programs used for comparison include l the U.S. Nuc' car Regulatory Commission (NRC) TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring Network and the Mississippi State Department ofHealth (MSDH) Division of Radiological Health. The latest available NRC TLD Network results compare to those from the GGNS ESP. In addition, as shown in Section 2.2 of this report, GGNS and NRC TLDs produced similar results on the average. ) The MSDH and the GGNS ESP entail similar radiological momtonng L i samphng requirements. These programs include collocated air samples and splitting or sharing sample media such as vegetation, water, sediment, meat, fis and milk. Both programs have obtained similar results over previous years. In 1993, and as in previous years, the MSDH and GGNS detected radioactivity attributable to plant effluent in the barge slip. 6.8 Unavailable Results GGNS received analytical contractor results in adequate time for inclusion in this report, in addition, GGNS' review identified no missing results. 6.9 _ Harmful Effects or Irreversible Damaec g The ESP monitoring did not detect any harmful effects or evidence of ) irreversible damage in 1993. Therefore, GGNS personnel addressed no proble L 6-3
<ft.. 6, m'; ..c s c:: c3% ~ ~m
- .p e
i n 3 T ' ',1 [ jq M. !r p# [' tg - 4 + r r' G' ',h'l j.h. M T s p{~' +, ONT:] /k y }:[!( n, + gm.. .. a' ^, i@ , -/, 'D
- , ; {II r
r i .m c I. m[', }gpg 'h,'; k.(:e, s. 3 ' v q J \\ c' ', 1 , _ - _>r l y, g y y 1 -,. ~ 'y t 1 ._ re n j
- y.,t,,'y.-
,-Y 7 h a s k 4 s '. i g%; q. i ' 4 4,:N :j. 3 f' t t'. s. s 7 i .; 7 q- 'p,., g. N p. ,q( j :q-- d '.,h S 1 t 'e N" I....; j E h. 4 '. r + N, _ p:: .; j g , s t.-%,- 7_ p' g .'b trir 1, ~j
- , h.
, 'g"+., 'l s l > 3 - a + ,1 N e, E r.+h6- ...S..',?'..'y g M N ,s"-- 1; 1 i 9,p -o ..o,p.'_< q t 6 ( - D I z [_ q ?..' 'J- <f C qs. ?.< ?, f'f;b. .i,.,c .s L
- 'lf ;
6 f 9 p -. NA;,3 l4' '~ y;. 4 4 y..: m a. i ' b' t 5 =.C ,R Wr ~ y.y* t ':' l' 'O' j i} ,"#.a t. }^/ 4/!' .[ J, N a 'g 5 5 -'R $) i.t.f' s ,,,,,.;, J'('. V ( p ;. ,s 7.;ynx,,y ,t l [ , '._/L tcd d..a~ _a.,,..m. cp,, -y 9: '\\ f '; y u .m v Y g-d c
- p'l'
.j_, f 3. d, '; y j, I .,'Q^'E,. h ;'fg,./ I ' : e , Y 9( L p yF -.<,.s A f q f.. ' '. ' M.;. -Q e. : ' 4 i e ~ L - y n_c.p e 8 t --; y , p,, p- 3 >w+% yd:' q ,-:^\\ %'/*%' 'i / .e
- y,.y g
.-nI-j',. 5 Jr.g ! j ,yr -l.D M- =.a, " ' *, e,,
- h7 -
7 i - + "1 .. c rtu - r s a 0~.c .,+ < g , o5 c,'*., t 'g ea,,
- t f f y
~~ , e g r r ? .\\ _ g --[ g ) 7 g, f } ,,A,- ,7,5 )..'y ' ' [$ ',' e 4 P _ ' A;, ( ... yi j g . l hC f ,k, ,..c-,, 4 S" N i. 1 i,als ~s 1, ,e ~ <. y.y u Sc .h "., -4..e {-l ' ( ;; t
- C. m.' !,.y,
f, 'i ~ =% _ i
- }
V. - s 2 g7 g b,,{v+s. sh d i s,-- g s, .j F J. J.v. f
- p.,.
7. 3,L,f,g. 4 7,<. v 9* @i. ~ s .~. f ' } g. 4 4 e 5 1 / ., (p.t.y p r s. , *s,..u sy aad y j f y r r '-" a '.p
- 4 i
i 3 s < + ..() b v s y q v. l >^ +., .[f [h,rf i - _A.J.* \\ >f~A,. $T 'L ^ .. ) -^' +' '_j '_ a 2. _,,1 c( p,. 's e t v x( 1 + ? ,f. 3 t ~ 5,5 .. k p_ t 1 ,cs,,' .y k -'.*8 f m y i ^, .4 yfj ys 4 /Yd l%,,f;';; 1993 ENVIRONM. ENTANSAMPdNG AND AN11XTI$ CREN}OR.6,h' 7 x n.*; 3-w y p 3 9n 4' nn e 'b N .? W h ' ' ' i' ,;.w r ,4 s ,Q. u .#(5' 1 .y.h' 3 s L 33:
== w. -wa,usegeer s, n .g s + p).: ng y b 3 s >~-.;*. i y., -t,,, I ~_k'. v y' hf 3' i_ 0 ?i ,') 'd .'t! ,'.^ I ,.,xc'W > v c. l ,f t (~ s' ^ ",y[' 5 iSby 3 (-~, l' l' [ 4q g _ ',Tk 6 u h,b, ( f,--'g4 y : D /- ( +', -; h' s - s m Q%Q n hY j 0J" g P, ~ u. ,ft H. , + r f;.' h( t r s< f-' ',) - + < p;c' M~.. s A,:...
- J[W h s Nw w2Q
- 3. :s,
- rr
? ^ , 4 >. ~. '. - s 1 n ->;;.p(y w, c ' 5 "- 1 'O if ) f' h
- - q n;f-
.L > ;yQ " ;,, Q 1 A. 'f ;; 'h, [f t' .; q:f (: jr+ ,.g P g 4 ,,. f! 4 ,a y ,,p~s--f + s Y .v. n < < w . 2 g a,. l. , ? g.'+ { yf ^ ' s, V y ( , f ? ,,N h E-,, y. :fg y_. ) S g'_' g 2 ,5'^v ,c.; b.. .;$ J Q i 2 .y O-, '"( .' V' 5 e >> / g n &y v. ~ p 3, , < + L c %%_ Ny
- 5 I'
Iy[ p ,s ~ e 1 ~h yh-ga y f. y7 O n._, n, I' @ i 3,r n w W: y 1 + _ pu kb- -f, p, , :;.w g),y'Y %O Ny ub..i l 4 s t 2 ,, 4 ' ..;yc-e _ }; >. ' '.,^,
- g y._)_.,f y -p.s,J..g, '-
, -_;{. ' f:4.. m, 8 m,p m ;.: 4e : -4e,. y r3. <T g r w.s , 3.,4 s, 4 y;.- g-v ..:.;.,s h*
- 5.4 p', g*g, e
,-[_ f *[ ,,.,3r ,1 ,a t s,. "jl+ ?j _t/ g g , y c } % g_ ' A g ..,~t l3: ) y k rr, b/, 7 z' l ,'5' g a 41 n. i. 3 5d-y, ; .;9 : p. r tY
- s r., s, j
f, 4 t 1g 3 / 'se g' g jI.g ' f l'd, y', 4, i ^ F i- ,.-? A ' t t 3 7 ,.*4. 2 1 + .a .c b" ? g bh g y s'-I. '5 '. m - r g, 1sf' 8- + y 4 F ;/,, I Ir Q,' m 4 g 4,. g; a 4y m _:g: e mg M v4
- r...
- e. f
- s..u
.[ }[ Y j-L' 'f g f 3, g -. c-o g' ] l- 'b r s h \\ t e-Y Y K ' f (, }.; ,'r' 4 ^ F 7 4 J 1 [_ r' 4 2 g c: c e 13 Wr ?&. (
.i l 'l GRAND GULF RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DECEMBER 1993 b PREPARED BY: SYSTEM CHEMISTRY SECTION ENTERGY SERVICES, INC.
~. f' GRAND GULF RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
SUMMARY
OF MONITORING RESULTS 1-DATA TABLES: AIR SAMPLES 2 CISTERN WATER 24 GROUND WATER 28 SURFACE WATER 30 I VEGETATION: BROADLEAF 36 [ 1 MILK 42 -4 FISH 43-SEDIMENT 45 SPECIAL SAMPLES: ANIMAL MEAT (VENISON) 46 SURFACE WATER (GRAB) 47 SEWAGE SLUDGE 48 i. SEDIMENT 49 l. EPA CROSS CHECK RESULTS L k
' I Summary ofMonitoring Results
- Plant-related isotopes were detected in the surface water and sewage sludge during this reporting period.
Low-level analysis ofIodine-131 was unable to be performed on ALCONT milk samples 931026 and 931027 sampled June 6,1993 due to sample decomposition. The ALCONT milk sample was re-sampled on June 29,1993 and low-level analysis ofI-131 was completed. Air samples for the period of 05/25/93 through 06/02/93 and 06/02/93 through 06/08/93 totaled eight days and six days, respectively,- due to the Memorial Day Holiday falling on 05/31/93 and Company OfTDay falling on 06/01/93. This resulted in collecting one set of samples (05/25/93 - 06/02/93) a day later than normal and shortening the other set of samples (06/02/93 - 06/08/93) by one day. Gross beta and Iodine-131 analysis was unable to performed on air sample station AS-5 for the period of 07/20/93 - 07/27/93 due to insufficient flow. Gross beta and Iodine-131 analysis was unable to performed on air sample station AS-1 for the period of 07/27/93 - 08/03/93 due to insuflicient flow. Gross beta and Iodine-131 analysis was unable to performed on air sample station AS-1 for the period of 08/10/93 - 08/17/93 due to insufficient flow. Gross beta and Iodine-131 analysis was unable to performed on air sample station AS-6 for the period of 09/14/93 - 09/21/93 due to insufficient flow. Gross beta and Iodine-131 analysis was unable to performed on air sample station AS-11 for the period of 11/16/93 - 11/23/93 and 11/23/93 - 11/30/93 due to a blown fuse. Lab numbers followed by a ending of"GG" denotes a duplicate sample. \\ y i l i
- Summary prepared by Corporate Environmental.
j 1 1 i I J . ~, _, ._z
5399 071 0 57330 5921 7950 82786 7 1 1 00 1 21 1 1 1 21 20 1 1 1 1 01 21 1 1 3 0 0000 001 00 00000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0.0 1 1 1 l 0 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 TR O PER GN A 2222 2222 22222 2222 2222 22223 I T 0000 0000 00000 00 00 0000 00000 0000 0000 0000.0 0000 000 0 0.0000 R E B 0004 0000 00000 0000 4000 00000 O 1 - /- // / /- / /- / I- /- / /- //// / / / /- / / / /- /- / S 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T I S 0 7849 1 75 98 1 1 1 3300 0292 92329 N O 1 1 20 21 1 1 01 1 1 01 1 1 1 1 01 01 220 e R 0000 00 0a 0.0000 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 000.00 m O G 0000 000L 00000 0000 0000 00000 i M t LA n C u I r G O sr L ) u O I I o D E ( h T 3333 33 33 333 33 3333 3333 33333 A A 9949 999 9 S99 99 S99S 9999 99 999 3 / / / / / / / / / / / ! / / // / / / R D 5296 2963 29630 &307 41 85 2 65 29 L D 0///2 001 2 001 / / !4 4 44 555 5 66666 23 01 22 0///2 001//C/2 1 1 1 1 1 / / / / / / / / / 1 1 1 1 2222 313 33 A N 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 9 E T t N E E a T M A 2333 3333 33333 3333 3333 33333 e N D 99S9 9996 9 9 9. 9 9 99SS 9S99 99999 s 9 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / // // 9529 62 9 32963 0630 741 8 52852 u O I 201 1 2001 2001 2 301 2 201 N 2001 2 1 / / / // / / / / / / / / / / // f / / / / / 222 23133 344 4 4 555 56666 R G 21 1 1 1 1 000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 I E n V B w I N E N G D o E N L B L l A o 2282 690 4 1 61 4 4 5775 5585 4 624 9N3 H N D 0 4 96 928 9 35 1 37 5049 2697 2 9 36 C 0001 222 334 4 4 5666 7778 900 ) 1 B O 0 000 0000 00000 000 0 0000 X 0 01 1 1 A E 3 333 3 3 33 333 33 33 3 3 3333 3 33 ( E L R 9999 9999 99999 9999 9999 99999 Y LK E E W ) 13H 1 T - W n 1 ATS EU u BO (, U a SW r E f L T G 3 PN P r MO e 1 1 AC3 N S S 1 t 'm A n . Rt s I Ol / O. AI C N: nr
- T p O
U NEC : TI n E L E S g L PL A BML I C re T AAON O a TSCU L n I
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 1.la SAMPLE-AIR SAMPLES,(BETA.1-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCVm"3 LOCATION: AS.1, PG LAB NO. DEGtN DATE END DATE GROSS 8 ETA l-131 REQ'OLLi> 0 01 0.07 931090 06/2993 07/06/93 0.020 +/-0 002 <0013 931194 07/06S3 07/13S3 0.007 +/-0.002 <0.014 931245 07/13S3 07/20/93 0.006 +/.0.002 < 0.011 931266 07/20S 3 07/27S 3 0.027 +/-0 002 < 0.010 931310 07/27/93 08/03S3 ( 2 ) NO SAMPLE NO SAMPLE 931355 08/03/93 08/10S3 0.007 +/-0 002 < 0.013 931383 08/10/93 08/17/93 (3 ) NO SAMPLE NO SAMPLE 931409 08/17/93 08/2493 0.015 +/-0.002 < 0.013 931449 08/2493 08/31 S 3 0.019 +/-0 003 < 0.022 931473 08/31 S 3 OS07S3 0.013 +/-0 002 <0.009 931510 09/07/93 09/1493 0 020 +/-0.002 < 0.013 931553 09/l493 09/21 S 3 0.006 +I4002 <0013 i 931591-09/21/93 09/28S 3 0 008 +/-0.002 <0010 931673 09/28S 3 1aV5S3 0.016 +/-0.002 <0016 931731 10/05 S 3 10/12/93 0.018 +/-0 002 <0.027 931766 10/12S3 10/1993 0 019 +/-0.002 <0.022 931812 10/19/93 10/26S3 0 013 +/-0.002 4 0.022 931838 10/26S 3 11/02 S3 0.015 +/-0 002 < 0.019 931883 11/02/93 11/09 S 3 0.011 +/-0.002 < 0.014 931932 11/09/93 11/16S3 0.013 +/-0 002 < 0.020 931975 11/16S3 11/23 S3 0.012 +/-0.002 ~< 0.018 931w93 11/23 S 3 11/30S 3 0.015 +/4.002 < 0.014 932043 11/30/93 - 12/0TS3 0.016 +/-0.002 < 0.014 932083 12/07/93 12/1493 0.014 +/-0.002 <0.010 932127 12/1493 12/21/93 0.017 +/-0.002 < 0.018 [ 932160 12/21/93 12/28/93 0.009 +/-0.002 < 0.014 t (2) Blown fuse at 0.1 hours run time. (3) Blown fuse at 12.0 hours run time. s = CONTROL LOCATION = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 3 ..m
i i ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLENO_: 1.2 SAMPLE: AIR SAMPL ES. (PETA,l-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUCUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE ) UNITS: pCPm"3 LOCATION: AS-3, 6 t VA LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA 1-131 - REQ'D LLD 0 01 0 07 930003 12/29/92 01/05/93 0 011 *.9 002 <0015 930043 01/05/93 01/12/93 0 015 +/-0 002 <0.013 930099 01/12S 3 01/1983 0.018 +/-0 002 <0.009 930163 01/19S 3 01/2&S3 0 008 +/-0 002 <0.009 930197 01/26/93 02/02 S 3 0.013 +/4002 <0010 930230 02/02/93 02/09S 3 0 015 +/-0.002 < 0.017 930281 02/0W93 02/16t93 0.010 +/-0 002 <0021 j 930295 02/16/93 02/23S 3 0.017 +/-0 002 <0010 '930332 02/23S 3 03S2/93 0 019 +/-0 002 <0015 930357 0102$3 03/09 S 3 0.011 +/4002 <0.017 930412 03/09/93 03/16S3 0.009 +/-0.002 < 0.013 930435 03/1&S3 03/23S3 0.012 +/-0.002 <0023 930475 03/23S 3 03/30/93 0009 +/-0.002 < 0.010 930556 03/30/93 ' 0406S3 0.008 +b0 002 < 0.025 930608 04D6/93 04/13/93 0.017 +/4002 < 0.009 930643. 04/1363 04/20S3 0.003 +/-0.002 < 0.012 930696 04/20/93 0427S3 0.009 +/-0 002 <0011 930726 04/27/93 05/0493 0.007 +/-0.002 <0017 930766 05/04/93 05/11S 3 0.010 +/-0.002 < 0 009 930799 05/1143 05/18S3 0.009 +/-0 002 <0015 930876 05/18/93 05/25/93 0 011 +/-0.002 < 0.010 930925 05/25S3 06/02 S 3 0.008 +/4002 <0018 t 930954 O&O2/93 O&D8S3 0 006 +/-0.002 < 0.022 i ' 930997 06/08/93 06/15 S3 - 0.006 +/-0132 l 0.017 931033 06/1593 06/22/93 0.007 +/-0.002 < 0.018 931065 - 06/22S 3 06/29S3 0.005 +/-0 002 < 0.016 l
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLEtio.: 1.2a SAMPLE A!R SAMPLES (BETA,l.131) COLLECTION; CorJTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE t.;N!TS: pCurn"3 LOCATION: AS-3, 61VA l. LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA M31 REOD LLD 0 01 0 07 931091 06f2293 07E493 0.019 +/-0.002 <0013 931195 07J0693 - 07/1193 0.008 +/4.002 <0014 931246 07/13G3 07/2G93 0.005 +/-0.002 <0011 931267 07/2093 07/27/93 0.016 +/-0.002 <0010 931311 07/27S 3 08m93 (1) 0029 +/4 007 <0019 S31356 0803S3 08/1G93 0 008 +/-0.002 <0013 931384 08/1G93 08/17S 3 0 014 +/-0 002 < 0 011 931410 08/17 S 3 - 08/2493 0.016 +/-0.002 < 0,013 931450 08/24S3 08/31 S 3 0.014 +/-0002 <0022 j 931474 M S3 OaV7S3 0.013 +/-0.002 < 0.009 931511 OSC7S3 0G/1493 0.021 +/-0.002 < 0 013 9315S4 09/1493-09f21S3 0.005 +/-0.002 < 0.013 931592 09/21 S 3 09/2&93 0.008 +/-0002 <0010 931674 09f28/93 ' 1C%93 0.013 +/-0.002 <0016 931732 1G%93 10/12/93 0 013./-0.002 < 0 027 931767 10/1293 10r1E93 0 016 +/-0 002 <0.022 S31813 - 10/1293 10/2693 0 011 +/4 002 < 0 022 - 931839 10/2693 1102S3 0.011 +/4.002 <0019 931884 11/02 S 3 1110a93 0.008 +/-0 002 <0014 S31933 11r$G3 11/1693 ' O 013 +/4002 < 0.020 931976 ~ 11/1593 11/23!93 0.009 +/4 002 <0.018 931994 - t1/2193 III3G93 0.016 +/-0.002 <0014 932044 11/3a93 12/07S3 0.016 +/-0D02 <0014 932084 -12C7S3 -12/1493 - 0.014 +/-0.002 - <0010 932128 12/1493 ~ 12/21S3 0.012 +/-0.002 < 0.018 932161 12/21/93 122&93 0.011 +/-0.002 < 0 014 .(1) Power failure at 88.27 hours run~ time. O = CONTROL LOCATIOtt * = LOWLEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 5 _____:.__..--__---_______._-_- - _--_m
~ ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO, : 1.3 SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES. (BETA,6-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCi/m"3 LOCATION. AS-4, GJOE LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS DETA l-131 REO*D LLD 0 01 0 07 930004 12/29/92 01/0553 0.009 +/-0 002 < 0.015 930044 01/05/93 01/1293 0 010 +/-0.002 <0013 930100 01/12/93 01/19S 3 0 015 +/-0 002 < 0.009 930164 01/19/93 01/26/93 0 006 +/-0.002 < 0.009 930198 Ot/26/93 02/02S3 0.013 +/-0.002 <0.010 930231 02/02/93 02/09/93 0 012 +/-0.002 <0017 l 930282 02/09/93' 02/16/93 0.011 +/-0.002 <0021 j 930296 02/16/93 02/23/93 0.013 +/-0 002 < 0.010 l' 930333 02/23/93 03/0293 0.017 +/-0.002 <0015 i 930358 , 03Et/93 03/0G/93 0 008 +/-0.002 <0017 930413 03/0%93 03/16/93 0.006 +/-0.002 < 0.013 930436 03/16/93 03/23/93 0 009 +/-0 002 <0023 930476 03/23/93 03/30/93 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0 010 930557 03/30/93 04/06/93 0.005 +/-0.002 < 0.025 930609 04/06/93 04/13/93 0.014 +/-0.002 < 0.009 930649 04/13/93 04/20/93 0.010 +/-0.002 <0.012 930697 04/20 S 3 . 04/27/93 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0.011 930727 04/27/93 05/04/93 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0.017 930'c7 05/04/93 05/11 S 3 0 008 +/-0 002 <0009 l 930600 05/11 S 3 05/1Gi93 0.008 +/-0.002 <0.015 930877 05/18/93 05/25/93 0.013 +/-0.002 < 0.010 930926 05/25/93 06/02S3 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0.018 930955 06s02/93 06/08/93 0.005 +/-0.002 < 0.022 930998 06/08/93 06/15/93 - 0.007 +/-0.002 < 0.017 931034 06/15S3 06/22/93 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0.018 931066 06/2293 06/29 S 3 0.002 +/-0 002 < 0.016 ~
- = CONTROL LOCATIONQ[ = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS _,_
ENvlRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 1.3a. SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(BETA,1-131) COLLECTION. CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCi/m*?3 LOCATION: AS-4 GJOE LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA b131 REQ'D LLD 0 01 0 07 931092 - OS/2S93 07/0693 0 016 +/4 002 <0 013 931196 07/06/93 07/13S3 0 006 +/-0 002 < 0.014 931247 07/13/93 07G0/93 0 004 +/ 0.002 <0011 931268 07/20/93 07/27S 3 0.016 +/-0.002 < 0.010 931312 07/2763 O&D3/93 0.013 +/4.002 <0019 931357 08/03/93 08/10S 3 0.008 +/4.002 <00t3 931385 08/10,93 08/17/93 0 018 +/-0 002 < 0.011 931411 08/17/93 08/24S 3 0.015 +/-0 002 < 0.013 931451 08/2493 08/31 S 3 0.015 +/-0.002 <0.022 931475 08/31/93 09/07/93 0.010 +/-0 002 < 0.009 931512 09wD7S3 09/1493 0.022 +/-0.002 < 0.013 931555 09/1493 09/21/93 0.007 +/-0.002 <0.013 931593 09/21/93 09/2&S3 0.008 +/-0.002 <0010 931675 09/28/93 10/0593 0.012 +/-0.002 < 0.016 931733 10/05/93 10/12S3 - 0 013 +/-0.002 < 0.027 931768 10/12/93 10/19S3 0.018 +/4 002 < 0 022 931814-10/19/93 10/26/93 0 012 +/-0.002 <0022 931840' ~ 10/2683 11/02 S3 0.013 +/-0.002 <0019 931885 11/02/93 11/09S3 0.011 +/-0.002 < 0.014 931934 11/09/93 11/16S3 931977 11/16/93 .11/2353 ~ 0.014 +/-0 002 <0020 0 009 +/0.002 <0018 931995 11/23/93 11/30 S 3 0.014 +/4.002 < 0.014 932045 11/30/93 12,07S 3 0.012 +/4 002 <0014 932085 12/07/93 12/1493-O_012 +/-0.002 < 0.010 932129 12/1493 12/21193 0.011 +/-0.002 < 0.018 932162 12/21/93 12/28/93 0.012 +/-0.002 <0014 s = CONTROL LOCATION
- y LOWLEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 7
ENVIRONMENTAL RAD!OLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO.
1.4 SAMPLE
A;R SAMPLES,(BETA,1-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCifm**3 LOCATION: AS-5. TC LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA l-131 - REO*D LLD 0 01 0 07 930005 12/29/92 01/OSS3 0.010 +/O.002 < 0 015 930045 01/05/93 01/12/93 0.014 +/-0.002 <0.013 930101 01/12/93 01/19i93 0.018 4 0 002 < 0.009 930165 01/19193 01/26/93 0 006 +/-0 002 <0009 l 930199 01/26/93 02/02/93 0 015 +/-0.002 <0.010 930232 02/02/93 0209/93 0.010 +/-0.002 < 0.017 I 930283 02/09/93 02/16/93 0.010 +/4.002 < 0.021 930297 02/16/93 02/23/93 0.015 +/4 002 <0.010 930334. 02/23/93 03/02/93 0.019 +/-0.002 <0015 i 930359 03/02/93 03/09/93 0.006 +/-0.002 <0017 930414 03/09/93 03/1'A 3 0 008 +/-0.002 <0.013 l 930437 03/16/93 CJ/23/93 0.009 +/-0.002 < 0.023 930477 03/23/93 03/3G93 0.008 +/-0.002 <0010 930558 - 03/30SJ 04/06/93 0.005 +/-0.002 <0.025 930610 04/06/93 04/13S3 0.013 +/4.002 <0009 930650 04/13/93 04/20/93 0.006 +/-0.002 < 0.012 930698 04/20/93 04/27/93 0.009 +/-0.002 <0011 l 930728 04/27/93 05/04S3 0.007 +/4.002 <0.017 930768 05/04/93 05/11/93 0.008 +/O 002 <0009 930801 05/11/93 05/18/93 0.008 +/4.002 <0.015 930878 05/18/93 05/25 S 3 0.013 +/-0 002 <0010 l 930927 05/25/93 06/02S 3 0.008 +/-0.002 <0.018 l 930956 06/02/93 06/08 S 3 0.006 +/-0.002 < 0.022 930999 06/08/93 06/15S3; 0.007 +/-0.002 <0.017 l 931035 06/15/93 06/22/93 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0.0tS 931067 06/22/93 06/29/93 0.007 +/-0.002 <0016 t ) t .. n a.
~ ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLENO.: 1.4a SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(BETA,1-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCi/m*-3 LOCATION: AS-5. TC LAB NO. BEGIM DATE END DATE GROSS BETA l-13t REQD LLD 0 01 0 07 931093 06/2993 07/0&93 O_020 +/-0.002 <0.013 931197 07/06/93 07/13$3 0.009 +/-0 002 < 0014 931248 07/13 S 3 07/2a93 0 005 +/-0.002 <0011 931269 07/20/93 07/27S 3 (1 ) NO SAMPLE NO SAMPLE 931313 07/27/93 O&V3S3 0.016 +/-0 002 <0.019 931358 O&S3S3 08/10/93 0.013 +/-0.002 <0013 931386 08/1G93 08tt7/93. 0.022 +/-0 002 <0011 931412 08/17/93 08/2493 0.018 +/-0.002 <0013 931452 08/24/93 08/31/93 0.017 +1-0.002 <0022 931476 08/31193 0197S3 0.014 +/-0.002 <0.009 931513 0947S3 09/1493 0 021 +/4002 <0.013 931556 09/1493 09/2163 0.009 +/-0.002 <0.013 931594 09/21/93 09/28/93 0 Ot0 +/-0 002 <0.010 931676 09/2&93 1aOSS3 0.016 +/-0 002 <0.016 931734 1GDSS3 10/12/93 0.015 +/-0.002 <0.027 931769-10/12S 3 10/19S3 0025 +/4002 <0022 931815 10/19S3 10/2&S3 0.015 +/4002 <0.022 931841 ' 10/2G93 11102S3 0.015 +/-0.002 <0.019 931886 11/02 S 3 11AE93 OD12 +/-0.002 <0.014 931935 11rS93 11/1&93 - 0.013 +/-0.002 <0.020' 931978 11/16 S 3 11/23/93 0 009 +/-0.002 - <0018 931996 11123S 3 1113G93 0.012 +/-0.002 <0.014 932048 1113a93 12.97S 3 0.015 +/4002 <0.014 932086
- 12/07/93 -
12/1493 - 0.014 +/-0 002 <0.010 932130 12/1493 12/21/93-OD14 +/-0.002 <0.018 932163 12/21/93 12/2&93 0.011 +/-0.002 <0.014 (1) Pump failure at 0.1 hours run time.
- = CONTROLLOCATION 9 = LOW LEVE1. ANALYSIS i
PAGE 9.
1 i 5399 071 0 57330 5921 7950 8 2786 1 00 1 1 21 1 1 1 7 1 1 21 20 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 21 1 1 3 0 0 000 0000 0 0000 0.0 0 0 4 0 0.0 0.0000 1 I 0 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 TR O PER G A 2222 2222 22222 2222 2222 221 22 T 0 0 00 0000 00 000 0 00 0 00 00 00000 N I E 0000 0000 0 0000
- 0. 0 00 00 0. 0 00000 B
0044 4O00 44004 4040 0040 00400 R 1 S 0 //// / / / / / / / /- / / /- / / / /- // /- /- / /- /- O S 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T O 2807 871 9 1 21 20 6202 7085 96785 e 20 1 1 1 1 21 1 1 1 1 1 I R 0000 0000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 00 0. 0 i 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 00000 m N G 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 t O M n L u A r C I s G r O u L ) o 1 h O E ( I T 3333 3333 33333 3333 3333 33333 9 D A 9SS9 S9S9 99S9S SSS9 S6S9 SS9SS A D 529 6 2961 29630 6 307 41 &5 28529 2 / / // / / / R D /1 1 1 1 01 1 2 /0//2 001 23 01 22 01 0 1 / / / / / / / / 001 22 1 2 / /// 1 /// 2222 31313 44 4 4 5555 66666 L N 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 3 A E 1 T t N E a E T M A 2333 3333 33333 3333 3333 33333 D 99SS 9SSS 9 9,S 9 S S9 96 S9S9 S9SS9 e / / / / / / / N 9529 6296 32G&3 0610 7M1 1 8 52&52 s N 201 1 20S1 20S1 2 3 D1 2 2 1 2001 2 u O I 21 1 1 i //// l / / ! / / / / / / / / / / / / / 0M00 3 4 4 4 555 5G666 f G 222 2333 3 R E 1 000 G000 00000 0000 0O000 I B n N E w t G O o E N L I L l S A O 26M7 87068 B S 6626 034 8 5S588 91 1 9 99 9 H N ) 0M999 T 0406 0389 25036 Y 3 1 37 5 1 59 C 0 01 1 2222 00m 3 4 4 4 566 6 L 77 8 99000 ) B O 0000 0000 X 000 0000 A 0 001 1 1 A E 333 3 3 333 3 3 3 3 3333 1 3 333 33 33 E N L R 9999 9999 9 9399 9999 99999 ( A YL L K E E V E E W L ) 1 3 H W 1-T O I 1 W L. A = TS EU BO ( . U N. SN O EI S I L T T PN R A MO O C 6 AC3 L
- 5. S : **
S 1 RNm A L I O i' O O AI C N: R
- T p O
T NEC : T I N E LE S O P L A L T C BML I O C AAON TSCU L
EtNIRONMEtRAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO_: 1.5a SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(BETA,6-131) COLLECTION: COrJTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCVm"3 LOCATION: AS4, RS LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA 1131 REOT) LLD 0 01 0 07 931094 06f29/93 07/06 S 3 0 022 */-0 002 <0013 931198 07/06 S 3 07/13S 3 0 009 +/-0 002 <0014 931249 07/13S3 07/20$3 - (2) < 0.006 < 0011 931270 07/20S 3 07/27S3 0 021 +I-0 002 < 0010 931314 07/27/93 08S3S3 0.014 +/4 002 < 0019 931359 O&C3S3 08ttaS3 0.011 +/-0 002 < 0013 931387 08/10S3 08/17S 3 0.022 +14 002 <0D11 -931413 08/17S3 08/2493 0 014 +/4002 <0013 931453 08/2493 08/31/93 0.018 +I-0 002 <0022 931477 08/31 S 3 09,07S3 0012 +14002 <0009 931514 ' 09S7S3 09/1493 0.021 +14 002 < 0.013 931557 09/1493 09/21 S 3 ( 3 ) NO SAMPLE NO SAMPLE 931595 09/21 S 3 09/2&S3 0 011 +/-0 CO2 < 0010 931677 09/2&s3 10/05/93 0015 +14002 < 0.016 931735 1GOSS3 10/1293 0.018 +/-0.002 <0.027 931770 10/1293 10/1ES3 0.024 +/-0 002 < 0.022 931816 10/19S3 10/2GS3 0.018 +/4 002 < 0 022 931842-10/2693 11/02.93 0.016 +14002 <0.019 931887 11/02 S 3 tt10SS3 0 013 +/4002 <0.014 931936 11/09 S3 11/16 S3 0.014 +/-0 002 < 0.020 931979 11/16 S 3 11/2393 0011 +/4002 < 0.015 931997 11/23 S 3 11/30S 3 0.011 +14002 < 0014 932047 - 11/30 S 3 12/07S 3 0 021 +/-0 002 < 0.014 932087 12C7/93 12/1493 0 019 +/-0 002 <0010 932131 12/14S3 12/21S 3 0 023 +14 002 < 0.018 S32164 12/21S 3 12/2&S3 0.016 +/-0.002 <0.014 (2) Pump failure at 72.4 hours run time. ^ (3) No flc r at collection. . # = CONTROLLOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 11 - - _ =
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE No.; 1.6 SAMPLE A!R SAMPLES,(BETA.1-131) COLLECTlott CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pC#m-3 LOCATIOtt AS-7, MT LAB NO.- BEGiN DATE END DATE GROSS SETA l.131 RECr0 LLD 0 01 0 07 930007 12!29 S 2 01J05S3 0 013 +/-0 002 <0015 930047 010593 01/12S 3 0 016 +/-0 002 <0013 S30103 01/12S3 01119/93 0 024 +/-0 002 < 0 009 930167 01/19S 3 0112693 0 006 +/-0 002 - <0M9 S30201 01/2593 0202S3 0 015 +/4 002 <0010 930234 02C2S3 02mS3 0 012 +/-0 002 <0017 930285 0209S3 02/1693 0.011 +/4 002 <0021 930299 02/1693 02/23 S 3 0 022 +/-0 002 <0010 930336 02/23 S 3 01C2S3 0 022 +/4.002 <0015 930361 0102S3 03m S3 0.010 +/-0.002 <0017 930416 03m S3 03/1G93 0 011 +/4 002 <0013 930439 03'1693 03/2193 0 011 +/-0 002 ' < 0 023 930479 012193 03t33S3 0 009 +/-0 002 < 0.010 930560 03!3aS3 04/0&S3 0 005 +/4.002 < 0.025 930612 04C6S3 04f1193 0014 +/4 002 <0009 930652 04/1193 042aS3 0 010 +/-0 002 < 0.012 S30700 042GS3' 04'27S 3 0 011 +/-0.002 < 0011 930730 0427S3 -05C4S3 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0017 930770 O&C4S3 05/11S 3 0.010 +/-0 002 < 0.009 930803 05/11 S 3 05t18.93 0.012 +/4002 <0015 930880 05/1&S3 05/25 S 3 0 015 +/-0.002 < 0010-930929 05/2593 ' 06/02!93 0 009 +/4 002 < 0.018 930958-OGC2S3 . O&C8/93 0.007 +14002 <0.022 931001 D&C8.S3 06/1593 0 008 +/-0 002 < 0 017 931037 06/1593 OG22S3(1) 0.007 +/-0D02 ' < 0018 931069 - 06/22S 3 O&29S3 0005 +/-0.002 - < 0_016 (1) Blown fuse at 133.27 hours run time. a = coggggEgutsmh e mmNESv.wipM_ - _ _ ____s ~
EtWIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT. TABLE NO. : 1.6a SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(BETA,1-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS W1TH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pClim-LOCATION. AS-7. MT LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA l-131 REOB LLD 0 01 0 07 931095 052aS3 07/06S3 1017 +/4002 < 0.013 931199' 07/0&S3 07/1353 (2) 12 002 +/4 002 <0.014 ~ 931250 07/13 S 3 07/20/93 0.005 +/4002 < 0.011 931271 07/20/93 07/27/93 0.019 +/-0.002 <0010 931315 07/27S 3 08/03/93 0 014 +/4002 <0019 931360 O&O3S3 08/10S3 0 010 +/4002 < 0.013 931388 08/10,93 08/17S 3 0.019 -/-0.002 <0011 931414 08/17S 3. 06/24S 3 0.014 +/-0 002 <0013 931454 08/24/93 08/31 S 3 0.015 +/4002 <0022 931478 08/31 S 3 OSS7/93 0 014 +/-0.002 <0009 ? 931515 OSV7S3 09/1493 0.017 +/4002 < 0 013 931558 09/1493 012143 0 008 +/-0.002 <0.013 931596 09/21 S 3 09/2&S3 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0010 931678 09/2&S3 10/05S3 0.014 +/-0 002 <0.016 931736 ta05S3 1GT12S3 0 013 +/-0 002 <0.027 931771 10/12S 3 10/1RS3 0.021 +/-0.002 <0.022 931817 10/1293 10/26/93 0 011 +/-0.002 <0022-931843 .10/26S3 11S2S3 0.013 +/-0 002 <0019 931888 11/02/93 1110193 0.008 +/4002 <0.014 931937 11/09/93 11/1693 0.013 +/-0 002 < 0.020 931980 11/16S 3 11/2193 0.007 +/4002 < 0.018 931998 11/23 S 3 11/3aS3 0.012 +14002 <0014-t 932048 11/30S 3 12/07S 3 0.016 +/-0.002 < 0.014 932388 12/07B3 12f14/93 - 0013 +/4002 <0.010 932132 12/14S3 12/21 S 3 0.015 +/4002 < 0.018 932165 12/21/93 12/2&S3 0.013 +/4002 <0014 (2) No flow at collection. s = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS i PAGE 13
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGl CAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. 1.7 SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(BETA,1-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCi/m"3 LOCATION: AS-8, WR LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA l-131 REQ'O LLD 0 01 0 07 930008 12/29/92 01/05/93 0 010 +/4 002 < 0.015 930048 01/05/93 01/12S 3 0.013 +/4002 <0013 930104 01/12/93 01/19/93 0 019 +/4 002 < 0.009 930168 01/19/93 01/26/93 0 34 +/4002 <0009 930202 tJ1125/93 02/02/93 0 015 +/-0.002 <0010 930235 02/02/93 02/09/93 0.013 +/4002 < 0.017 930286 02/00S 3 02/16S3 0.013 +/4 002 < 0.021 930300 02/16/93 02/23S 3 0.023 +/-0 002 < 0.010 930337 02/23S 3 03 S 2/93 0.023 +/-0.002 < 0 015 930362 03/02/93 03!D9S3 0 009 +/-0 002 <0017 930417 03/09/93 03/16S 3 0.010 +/ 0.002 < 0.013 930440 03/16/93 03/23/93 0.010 +/-0.002 < 0.023 930480 03/23 S 3 03/30/93 0.008 +/-0.002 <0.010 930561 03/30/93 04!O6/93 0.004 +/-0 002 < 0.025 .930613 04!O6/93 04/13/93 0.015 +/4002 <0.009 930653 04/13S3 04/20/93 0.009 +/4002 <0012 930701 ' 04/20S 3 04/27/93 0.010 +/-O 002 < 0.011 930731. 04/27/93 05 S4/93 0.006 +/-0.002 < 0.017 930771 05/04/93 05/1183 0.011 +/4002 <0.009 930804 05/11 S 3 - 05/18/93 0 008 +/-0 002 <0.015 930881 05/18/93 05/25/93 0 013 +/-0 002 <0.010 930930 05/25S3 06/02/93 0.008 +/4002 <0.01R '930959 06/02/93 06/08/93' O 010 +/-0.002. < 0.022 931002 06/08/93 06/15/93-0.008 +/4 002 <0017 931038 06/15/93 06/22/93 0.006 +/4002 < 0 018 931070 06/22S3 06/29/93 0.005 +/4002 < 0.016
~ i ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLENO: 1.7a SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES.(BETA.I-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCVnf*3 LOCATION: AS-8. WR LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA l-131 f REO O LLD 0 01 0 07 i 931096 06/29S 3 07/06 S 3 0.017 +/-0 002 <0013 931200 07S6/93 07/13S 3 0 010 +/.O 002 <0014 931251 07/1193 07/20/93 0 009 +s4 002 <0.011 931272 07/20S 3 07/27S 3 0.020 +/4002 <0010 931316 07/27/93 08.03S3 0.019 +/4002 ~ <0019 931361 08/03S 3 08/10S3 0.013 +/-0.002 <0.013 931389 08/10/93 08/1763 0.020 +/-0 002 <0011 931415 08/17/93 08/2493 0.016 +/-0.002 <0013 931455 08/24 S 3 08/31/93 0.018 +/-0.002 <0.022 931479 08/31/93 09/07/93 0.018 +/4 002 <0009 931516 0$07/93 09/14S3 0.026 +/-0.002 <0 013 931559 09/1493 09/21 S 3 0.010 +/4002 <0013 931597 09/21/93 09/28/93 0.009 +/-0.002 <0.010 931679 09/28S 3 10/05S3 0.020 +/4002 <0.016 931737 10/05S3 10/12S3 0.016 +/-0.002 <0.027 931772 10/12S3 10/19S 3 0.026 +/4002 <0022 931818 - 10/19/93 - 10/26 S 3 0.015 4 0 002 <0.022 931844 10/26/93 11/02S3 0.011 +/4002 <0.019 931889 11!O2S3 11/09 S3 0.012 +/-0 002 <0014 S31938 11/09/93 11/16S 3 0.016 +/-0.002 <0.020 - 931581 11/16 S 3 11/23 S 3 0.010 +/-0.002 <0018 931999 11/23 S 3 11/3a93.- 0.020 +/-0.002 <0.014 932049 _ 11/30/93 12/07/93 0.021 +/-0.002 - <0014 932089 12/07/93 12/1493-0.018 +/-0.002 <0.010 932133 12/14S3 12/2163 0 020 +/-0.002 <0.018 932166 12/21/93 - 12/28/93 0.018 +/-0 002 <0014 + t
- = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 15 L
m . - ma ^ V4 d 4
i ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. ; 1.8 SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES. (BETA. I-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS W1TH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCVm"3 LOCATION: AS-10 HR 9 I. LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA I-131 i l REOT) LLD 0 01 0 07 930009 12/29S 2 01/05/93 0.008 */4 002 <0015 l 930049 01/05/93 01/12/93 0.013 +/-0.002 <0013 i 930105 01/12/93 01/19/93 0.017 +/4002 <0.009 l 930169 01/19/93 01/26!93 0.005 +/-0 002 < 0.009 930203 01/26/93 02/02S 3 0 012 +/4 002 <0010 930236 02/02/93 02/09S 3 0 011 +/-0 002 <0.017 j 930287 02/09/93 02/16/93 0.009 +/-0.002 <0021 r 930301 02/16/93 02/23S3 0.015 +/-0 002 < 0 010 l 930338 02/23/93 03/02/93 0.019 +/-0 002 < 0.015 930363 03/02/93 03/09/93 0.007 +/-O 002 <0017 930418 03/09/93 03/16S 3 0 010 +/-0.002 <0013 930441 03/16/93 03/23 S 3 0.012 +/4002 <0023 930481 03/23/93 03/30/93 0.008 +/-0 002 <0010 930562 03/30/93 0406/93 0.008 +/-0.002 < 0.025 930614 04/06/93 04/1193 (1) 0.024 +/-0.006 <0.009 930654 04/13/93 04/20 S 3 0.011 +/-0 002 <0.012 930702 04/20/93 04/27S 3 0.011 +/4002 <0011 930732 04/27/93 05/0493 0.008 +/-0.002 <0017 930772 05/04/93 05/11S 3 0.009 +/-0.002 <0009 930805 05/11/93 05/18/93 0.010 +/4002 < 0.015 930882 05/18/93 05/2593 0.014 +/-0 002 < 0 010 930931 05/25 S 3 06/02S 3 0.008 +/-0 002 <0018 930960 06/02/93 06/08S3 0.011 +/-0.002 < 0.022 931003 06J08/93 06/t5/93 - 0.008 +/4 002 < 0.017 931039 06/15/93 06/22/93 ( 2 ) 0.007 +/-0.002 < 0.018 931071 06/22/93 06/29/93 (3 ) Om7 +/-0.003 < 0.016. (1) Power failure at 41.7 hours run time. (2) Blown fuse at 135.29 hours run time. (3) Power failure at 114.05 hours run time. l-7 . O a CONTR,OL LOCATION. * =. L@$70LRQLlRQLWDB
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGk AL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 1.Ba SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES. (BETA,1-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WTH WEEKLY EXCHANGE UNITS: pCW'3 l LCCATION: AS-10. HR LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA l-131 REO'D LLD 0 01 0 07 931097 06/29/93 07/0&S3 0 012 +/4 002 < 0.013 931201 07!O6/93 07/13 S 3 0.009 +/-O 002 <0.014 {- .931252 07/13 S3 07/20 S3 0.007 +!4 002 <0011 l 931273 07/2093 07/27S 3 0 015 +/-O 002 <0010 i 931317 07/27 S 3 O&C3S3 0 013 +1-0 002 < 0.019 931362 C&D3S3 08/10S3 0 010 +/-0 002 <0013 931390 08/10S 3 08/17S 3 0 017 +/-0.002 <0011 931416 08/1783 08/2493 '1011 +/-0.002 < 0 013 931456 08/2493 08/31!93 0 015 +/4.002 <0022 931480 08/3163 OS07/93 0.012 +/-0.002 <0009 931517 09107/93 09/14S3 0 020 +1-0 002 < 0.0t3 931560 09/14S3 09/21/93 0.008 +/-0.002 <0013 931598 09f21S3 09/2&S3 0.011 +/-0002 < 0.010 931680 09/2SS3 1305S3 0.015 +/4 002 < 0016 931738 1005/93 10/12S3 (4 ) 0.011 +/a002 < 0.027 931773 10/12/93 1Gfl9S3 (5) 0.022 +/4 002 <0022 931819. 10/19S3 10/26 S 3 0.011 +/-0.002 <0.022 931845 10/2693 11/02S 3 0.011 +/-0.002 < 0_019 931850 11/02S3 11209S 3 0.012 +/-0.002 < 0.014 931939 11/09S 3 11/16/93 0,014 +/-0.002 < 0_020 931982 11/1&S3 11/23 S 3 ( 6 ) NO SAMPLE NO SAMPLE 932000 11/21S3 11/3a93 (7) NO SAMPLE NO SAMPLE 932050 11/3a93 12/07S 3 0.023 +/-0.002 < 0.014 932090 12/07S 3 12/14S3 0 015 +/4 002 < 0.010 932134 12f1493 12f21/93 0 017 +/-0.002 < 0018 932167 12/2163 12/28S3 0.015 +/-0.002 <0014 U4) Power failure at 146.49 hours run time. (5) Short run time of 112.52 hours due to power outage. (6) Blown fuse at 6.53 hours run time. (7) Blown fuse at 8.14 hours run time.
- = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 17
5399 1 1 21 1 1 1 21 201 1 1 01 1 1 21 1 1 071 0 57330 5921 7950 827S6 1 00 7 1 1 3 0 3000 0 0.0 0 0 0000 0 0.0 0 0000 00000 1 T l 0 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 RO PER G A 2222 2222 22222 2222 2222 2222 T 0000 00 00 00000 0000 0000 0000 N I E 0.0.0 0 0000 0 0.0 0 0 0.0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0006 R B 0004 0000 00000 0000 4044 0040 0 1 /- ///0 e O S 0 /// / / / /- / ///// / / /- / / / // + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + m T S 0 0 63 1 6 81 94 57 1 29 5 870 61 53 84 66 i O 01 20 1 1 01 201 1 0 0001 01 01 0000 < IN R 0000 0000 00000 0 000 0.0 0 0 0000 t C G 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 0000 n M u L r A s C I r G uo O ) h L 1 O ( I 4 D E 3333 3333 33333 3333 3333 33333 7 T 999S 99 S9 99999 9 / /9999 99999 7 999 A A 5296 29&3 2963 0 6 307 4 1 85 28522 / / / / / / / / / / / / ! / //// R D 01 1 2 001 2 001 23 01 22 01 1 2 001 22 L D 1///1 / //// / / / / / / / / / / / / / ///// t A N 00001 2222 33333 4 4 44 5555 66666 1 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 a E T e N E r E T u A 233 3 3333 33333 3333 3333 33333 M D 9S//99 9999 99999 9999 9998 999 99 l 7 / / / / / / / / / / / // /// ///! / 9529 6296 32963 0630 7 4 1 8 52852 i N IN 201 1 2 O G 21 1 1/ / /001 2001 2 301 2 201 1 2001 2 a / / / / / // // / / // / /// / / /// 1 2 22 23333 344 4 4555 56666 f 1 000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 R E VI E B r G D e N N L w E A O. L o IS 0060 47 82 94922 3553 3363 21 402 P S H N ) 1 507 03 80 361 48 61 50 3708 3604 7 T C 001 2223 3344 4 5667 7788 99000 Y 1 B O 0000 0000 00000 00 00 0000 001 1 1 ) L XE A E 333 3 3 3 3 3 3 333 3 31 3 3 3333 33333 A_ L R 9999 9999 99999 9999 9999 99999 1 Y ( N L A K E LE E V W E ) 1 L 3H 1 T W 1 WI O A L. TS EU m BO (, U SN B EI N L T B O PN T I MO 1 9AC3 1 AC_ S : " S .RNm A O_ 1 L I Ou . AI C N: L O: T p O O NEC : T T I R, E LE S P L A 4 L t T BML I C O AAON O C TSCU L =
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT ~ TABLE NO. 1.sa SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(BETA,1-131) COLLECTION: CONTINUOUS WITH WEEKt.Y EXCHANGE UNITS: pCi/m"3 LOCAT10ft AS-11. BB LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE GROSS BETA l-131 REO'D LLD 0.01 0 07 931098 06/29/93 07/06/93 ( 2 ) 0.013 +/-0.002 < 0 013 931202 07,D6S3 07/13/93 0.007 +/ 0 002 < 0 014 - 931253 07/13/93 07/20/93 0 006 +/-0 002 <0011 931274 07/20/93 07/27/93 0.019 +/-0.002 < 0.010 931318 07/27S3 08/03/93 0 017 +/-0 002 <0019 931363 08/03/93 08/10/93 0 012 +/-0.002 < 0.013 931391 08/10 S 3 08/17/93 0.018 +/-0.002 <0011 931417 08/17/93 08/24/93 0.016 +/-0.002 < 0.013 931457 08/2493 08/31/93 0 018 +/-0.002 < 0.022 931481 08/31 S 3 09/07S 3 0.016 +/-0.002 <0.009 931518 09/07S 3 09/14/93 0.023 +/-0.002 < 0.013 931561 09/1493 - 09/21/93 0 009 +/-0 002 < 0.013 931599 09/21/93 09/28/93 0 008 +/-0.002 < 0.010 4 931681 09/28/93 10/05/93 0.016 +/4002 < 0.016 931739 10/05/93 10/12S 3 0.016 +/-0 002 < 0.027 931774 10/12/93 10/19/93 0.022 +/-O 002 < 0.022 931820 10/19/93 10/26/93 0.012 +/-0.002 < 0.022 931846 10!26/93 11/02/93 0.009 +/-0.002 < 0019 931891 -11/02/93 11/09/93 0.011 +/4 002 < 0.014 931940 11/09/93 11/16/93 0.012 +/-0.002 <0020 931983 11/16/93 11/23/93 0.006 +/-0.002 < 0.018 932001 11'23.93 11/30/93 0.017 +/-0.002 < f 314 9U/51 11/30/93 12/07/93 0.015 +/-0.002 < 0.014 932091 12/07/93 .12/14/93 - 0.007 +/-0.002 <0.010 932135 12/14/93, 12/21/93 0.011 +/-0.002 < 0018 932168 12/21/93 12/28/93 0.011 +/4002 < 0.014 (2) Power failure at 161.9 hou'rs run time.
- = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL. ANALYSIS
". PAGE 19 L
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. 1.10 SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(GAMA%) t 0LLECTION: QUARTERLY COMPOSITE OF WEEKLY SAMPLES UtnTS: pCirm"3 LOCATION LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE Cs-134 Cs-137 REO'D LtD 0 05 0 06 AS-1 PG 930541 12/29S 2 03/30 S 3 <00010 <00008 AS-3, 61 VA 930542 12/2967 OY30S3 <00011 <00008 l AS-4, GJOE 930543 12/29S 2 03/30S3 < 0.0011 <0000g AS-5, TC 930544 12/29/92 03/30S 3 <0.0012 < 00011 AS-6, RS 930545 12/29S 2 03/30S3 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 AS-7. MT 930546 12/29/92 03/30/93 < 0.0011 < 0.0000 AS-8. WR D30547 12/29 S 2 03/30/93 < 0.0010 < 0.0008 AS-10. HR 930548 12/29/92 03/30 S 3 < 0.0011 <00010 AS-11 BB 930549 12/29/92 03/30 S 3 < 0.0006 < 0.0006 1 { , s = GONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL A AbfSIS__ _
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 1.11 SAMPLE-AIR SAMPLES,(GAMMA) COLLECTION: QUARTERLY COMPOSITE OF WEEKLY SAMPLES UNITS: pCi/m"3 LOCATION LAB NO.. 3EGIN DATE END DATE Cs-134 Cs-137 REQ'D LLD 0 05 0 06 AS-1. PG 931115 03/3G93 06/29/93 <0.0006 < 0.0005 AS-3, 61VA 931116 03/30/93 06/29/93 < 0.0009 <C.0008 AS-4. GJOE 931117 03/30/93 06/29/93 < 0.0006 <0.0005 AS-5, TC 931 tis 03/3a93 06/29.93 < 0.0008 < 0.0008 e AS-6, RS 931113 03/30/93 06/29/93 < 0.0007 <00005 AS-7, MT 931120 03/30/93 06!29/93 <0.0010 < 00009 AS-8. WR.931121 03f30/93 06729/93 < 0.0006 <00006 AS-10,. HR 931122 03/30/93 06/29/93 <00011 < 0.0009 AS-11, BB 931123 03/30.93 06/29/93 < 0.0010 <0.0009 f s s = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYS1S PAGE 21 +
' ENV!RONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO,; 1.12 SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(GAMMA) COLLECTION: OUARTERLY COMPOSITE OF WEEKLt SAMPLES UNITS: pCVm"3 LOCATION LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE Cs-134 Cs 137 REQV LLD 00S 0 06 AS-1, PG 931621 06/29/93 09/28/93 < 0.0013 < 0.0014 AS-3, 61VA 931622 06/29/93 OW28/93 < 0.0007 <0.0006 AS-4. GJOE 931623 OG/29/93 09/28/93 <00014 < 0.0012 AS-5. TC 931624 06/29.93 09/28/93 < 0.0007 <0.0006 AS-6, RS 931625 06/29/93 09/28/93 < 0.0012 <0.0013 AS-7, MT 931626 06/29/93 09/28/93 < 0.0007 <00005 AS-8. WR 931627-06/29/93 09/28/93 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 AS-10 HR 931628 06/29/93 09/28/93 < 0.0009 < 0.0010 AS-11. BB 931629 06/29,93 09/28/93 < 0.0010 < 0.0011 O = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS ..,m - - ~ - - = - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~
~ 5 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 1.13 SAMPLE: AIR SAMPLES,(GAMMA) COLLECTION: QUARTERLY COMPOSITE OF WEEKLY SAMPLES UNITS: pCVm"3 ' LOCATION LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE Cs-134 Cs-137 REOV LLO 0 05 0 06 AS-1. PG 932179 09/28/93 12/2&93 <00010 < 00008 AS-3, 61VA. 932180 09/2&93' 12/2&S3 <00009 <0.0006 AS-4, GJOE 932181 09/28!93 12,78/93 <0.0012 < 00006 AS-5, TC ' 932182 09/2&93 12/2&93 ' 0.0010 <00008 AS-6, RS 932183 09/2&S3 12/28/93 <00008 <00005 ' AS-7. MT 932184 09/2&93 12/2&93 < 0.0010 < 0.0007 AS-8. WR 932185 09/2&93 12/28/93 < 0.0006 < 0.0005 AS-10. HR 932186 09/28/93 - 12/2&93 < 00009 < 0 0007 AS-11, BB 932187 09/28/93 12/2&S3 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 i I L 1
- = CONTROLLOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 23
.. :~.
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO.: 2.1 SAMPLE: CISTERN WATER, (BETA,1-131. GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY UNITS: pCi/L LOCATION: WILLIS CISTERN LAB NO. COLLECTION BETA l-131" Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 2n-65 Zr-95 N>95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE REQ'D LLD 40 1.0 15 30 15 15 30 30 15 15 18 60-15 930119 01/19/93 1.4 +/-1.3 < 0.4 <2 <3 <3 . <3 <5 <5 <3 <3 <2 < 11 <3 930120GG Ol/19S3 11 +/-1.3 < 0.4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 <9 <2 930291 02/18/93 3 9 +/-2.5 < 0.5 <2 <4 <3 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 12 <4 930427 03/17S 3 9.3 +/-2.5 < 0.3 <2 <2 <2 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <2 <9 <2 930674 04/20/93 < 4.0 < 0.4 <3 <4 <3 <3 <7 <7 <3 <3 <3 < 12 <4 930676GG 04/20/93 < 4.0 <05 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 ~<5 <3 <3 <3 <12 <4 930890 05/24/93 < 3.7 < 0.2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 <8 <3 931028 t.3/17G3 2.8 +/-2.0 < 0.3 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 <9 <3 931256 07/20/93 2.8 41.6 <03 <2 <3 <2 <2 -c 5 <5 <2 <2 <? <9 <3 931407 08/20/93 2.9 +/-1.5 < 0.5 <2 <4 <3 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 11 <4 931540 09/15/93 < 3.8 < 0.3 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <2 <8 <2 j 931777 10/19/93 10.1 +/-1.9 < 0.2 <3 <5 <4 <4 <7 <8 <4 <4 <4 <17 <6 931965-11/17/93 < 3.7 < 0.2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <2 <9 <3 932107 12/16/93 <36 < 0.3 <3 <4 <3 <3 <6 <7 <3 <3 <3 < 14 .<4 O =. CONTROL LOCATION * = _ LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS __m-m---- ~-~~~-
I ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE t40. : 2.2 SAMPLE: CISTERN WATER, (H-3) COLLECTlON: QUARTERLY COMPOSITE UtilTS: pCi/L LOCATIOt4: WILLis CISTERfA LAB NO. BEG!N DATE END DATE H-3 REQ'O LLD 2000 930429 01/19/93 03/17/93 < 510 j 330430GG 01/19/93 03!!7/93 < 510 1 931030 04/20/93 06/17/93 < 420 i 931542 07/20/93 09/15/93 < 400 932109 10/19/93 12/16/93 < 410 i l I l t = cot 4 TROL LOCATION PAGE 25 l
... = - 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO.
2.3 SAMPLE
CISTERN WATER, (BETA,1-131. GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY UNITS: pCi!1. LOCATION: MCGEE CISTERN LAB NO. COLLECTION BETA 3-131* Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE REO'D LLD 40 to 15 30 15 15 30 30 15 15 18 60 15 S30117 01/19S 3 < 1.8 <05 <3 <5 <4 <4 <8 <8 <3 <4 <4 < 14 <5 930118GG - 01/19 S 3 < 1.8 <06 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <6 <2 <3 <3 < 12 <4 930292 02/18S3 < 3.7 <05 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <3 <2 <2 <8 <3 930428 03/17!93 3 8 +/-22 < 0.3 <3 <4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <2 <3 <3 < 10 <4 930675 04'20/93 2.3 +/-2.3 < 0.3 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <3 <2 <2 < 10 <3 930677GG 04*20S 3 < 3.7 < 0.4 <3 <S <3 <3 <7 <8 <3 <4 <3 < 16 <6 930891 05/2493 <32 < 0.3 <3 <4 <2 <3 <S <6 <3 <3 <3 < 10 <3 931023 06/17/93 5.6 +/-2.2 < 0.3 <2 <3 <2 <2 <S <6 <3 <3 <3 < 11 <4 931257 07/2G93 < 20 < 0.2 <4 <5 <4 <4 <8 <8 <4 <4 <4 < 16 <S 9314C8 08/20S 3 < 1.9 < 0.4 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 <8 <3 931541 09/15/93 < 3.6 < 0.3 <3 <3 <2 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 <9 <3 931778 10/19/93 7.5 +/-1.6 <02 <3 <3 <3 <2 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 13 <4 931046 11/17/93 < 3.1 < 0.3 <3 <4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 12 <4 932108 12/16S 3 < 3.9 < 0.2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <3 18.=_ CONTROL LOCATION
- = LOMndMRkdQDW58R
- - - = ~ - ' ~ '
~- -.s .1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. 2.4 SAMPLE: CISTERN WATER, (H-3) COLLECTION: QUARTERLYCOMPOSITE UNITS: pCl/L LOCATION: McGEE CISTERN LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE H-3 REQT) LLD 2000 930431 01/19/93 03/17S3 <510 930432GG 01/19 S 3 03/17S 3 < 510 931031 04/20/93 06/17/93 270 +/-250 931543 07/20/93 09/15S3 < 400 932110 10/19!93 12/16/93 < 410 v -0 = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS ~PAGE 27
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO : 3.1 SAMPLE: GROUND WATER. (H-3, GAMMA) COLLECTION: QUARTERLY UNITS: pCVL LOCATION: PGWELL PORT G1BSON LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE H-3 M, 54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 NtF95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 + REO'D LLO 2000 15 30 15 15 30 30 15 15 18 60 15 930037 01/04S 3 < 510 <2 <2 <2 < 2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <3 930038GG 01/04S3 < 510 <3 <6 <3 4 4 <7 <8 <4 4 4 <4 < 17 <6 930568 04/02/93 < 610 <3 <4 <3 < 3 <5 <6 <3 < 3 <3 < 11 <4 931139 07/01/93 270 +/-250 <2 <4 <3 < 3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 16 <5 931696 10/01/93 < 400 <4 <6 <4 < 4 <8 <9 <5 < 4 <4 < 26 <8
- = CONTROL LOCATION
- = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS
_ _g g
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 3.2 SAMPLE: GROUND WATER.(H-3, GAMMA) COLLECTION: QUARTERLY UNITS: pCi/L LOCATION: AAWELL, ARNOLD ACRES LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE H-3 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 REOD LLD 2000 15 30 15 15 30 30 15 15 18 60 15 930039 01/0493 < 510 <2 <4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3. <3 <3 < 12 <4 930040GG 01/0493 < 510 <2 <3 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3' < 13 <5 930569 04/02/93 < 610 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <3 931140 0741/93 < 420 <2 <3 <2 <2 <5 <6 <3 <3 <2 < 15 <6 931697 10/01/93 < 400 <4 <5 <3 <4 <8 <8 <4 <4 <4 < 21 <8. PAGE 29 O = CONTROLLOCATION
- = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS -
4 J .-xa
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 4.1 SAMPLE: SURFACE WATER, GRAB (GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY UNITS: pCi/L LOCATION: MISS. RIVER UP LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 REO'DLLO 15 30 15 15 30 30 15 15 18 60 15 930029 01/05/93 <2 <3 <3 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <2 < 14 <4 930030GG 01/05/93 <3 <5 <4 <4 <8 <8 <4 <4 <3 < 18 <6 930214 02/02/93 <3 <5 <4 <4 <7 <9 <4 <4 <4 < 15 <5 930351 03!O2/93 <2 <2 <2 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <2 <7 <2 930596 04V6/93 <3 <5 <4 <3 <8 <8 <4 <4 <4 < 16 <5 930597GG 04/06/93 <3 <4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 13 <4 930753 05/0493 <2 <3 <2 <2 <5 <5 <3 <2 <2 < 10 <4 930945 06/02/93 <4 <5 <4 <4 <8 <9 <4 <4 <4 < 17 <5 931136 07/01/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <4 931333 08.03/93 <4 <4 <4 <4 <7 <8 <4 <4 <4 < 15 <5 931468 08/31/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <3 931703 10/01/93 <4 <5 <3 <3 <7 <8 <4 <4 <4 < 20 <5 931875 11/02/93 <2 <4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 14 <4 932032 11/30/93 <2 <4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 13 <4
- = CONTROL LOCATION. * = L'OW LEVEL ANALYSIS.
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO.: 4 2 SAMPLE: SURFACE WATER, (H-3) COLLECTION: QUARTERLY COMPOSITE UtilTS: pCi/L 1 LOCATION: MISS. RIVER UP LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE H-3 REQ D LLD 2000 930406 0105/93 0102/93 < 470 930408GG - 01/05/93 0102/93 < 470 930948 04/06/93 OGU2S3 < 420 931471 07/01/93 08/3163 < 430 t 932019 10/01/93 11/30/93 < 430 P L c s i .'O = CONTROL LOCATION - PAGE 31
m, ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 4.3 SAMPLE: SURFACE WATER. GRAB (GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY UNITS: pCi/L LOCATION: MISS. RIVER DOWN LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co40 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs.137 Ba-140 La 140 REQ'O LLD 15 30 15 15 30 30 15 15 18 60 15 930031 01/05/93 <3 4 4 <3 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 15 <5 930032GG 01/05/93 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 <12 <4 930215 02/02/03 <2 <2 <4 <3 <5 <5 <3 <3 <3 < 13 <4 930352 03/02/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <5 <5 <2 <2 <2 <8 <3 930598 0406/93 <3 <4 <3 <3 <6 <7 <3 <4 <3 < 16 <4 930599GG 0406/93 <3 <5 <3 <4 <7 <8 <4 <4 <4 < 17 <5 930754 0501/93 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 11 <4 930946 06.02/93 <3 <3 <3 <3 <5 <6 <2 <3 <3 < 13 <5 931137 07/01/93 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 13 <4 931334 08/03/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <3 931469 08/31/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <3 931704 10/01/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <5 <3 <2 <2 < 14 <5 931876 11/02/93 <2 <3 <2 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 14 <5 932033 11/30/93 <2 <2 <2 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <2 <8 <3 ~
- = CONTROL LOCATION - * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS m nt.
. _, +, ^ ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. ; 4.4 SAMPLE;' SURFACE WATER, (H-3) COLLECTION: QUARTERLY COMPOSITE UNITS: pCit LOCATION: MISS. RI'dR DOWN LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE H-3 REQ'D LLD 2000 930407 01,05/93 03/02/93 < 470 ' 930409GG. 01/05/93 - 03/02 S3 < 470 930949 0406/93 O&V2/93 < 420 931472 07/01 S 3 08/31/93 < 430 932020 10/01/93 - 11/30/93 < 430 i
- = CONTROL LOCATION
. PAGE 33 ' ^^ ~ ~ ~^
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. :4.5 SAMPLE: SURFACE WATER. COMPOSITE (GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY COMPOSITE UNITS:. pCVL LOCATION: DISCHARGE BASIN LAB NO. BEG!N DATE END DATE Ma-54 Fe-SS Co-58 Co40 2n-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 REO'O LLD 15 30 15 15 30 30 15 15 18 60 15 930216 01/05S 3 02/02/93 <3 ,4 <3 <3 <7 <7 <3 <4 <3 < 13 < 4 - 930350 02/02/93 03.01/93 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 13 4 5 930570 03/01/93 0402/93 <3 <6 <4 <4 <B <9 <4 <4 <4 < 19 < 7 930571GG 03/01/93 04/02/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 11 < 4 ( 930755 04/02/93 05/04S 3 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 <9 <3 930756GG 0402/93 05/0493 <2 <2 <2 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 11 <3 930947 05/04/93 05/2& 93 <3 -<4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 16 <6 931138 05/28/93 - 06/30/93 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 - < 13 <5 ~ 931335 06f30!93 07/3a93 <3 <3 <3 <3 <5 <6 <3 <3 <3 < 13 <4 931470 07/30/93 08/31/93 <2 <4 <3- <3 <5 <6 <3 ' <3 <3 < 12 <4 l 931705 08/31 S 3' 10/01/93 <3 -<5 <3 <3 <6 <7 <4 <3 <3 < 19 <7 l 931706GG 08/31/93 10/01/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <4 <5 <3 <2 <2 < 17 <6 931877 10/01/93 11/02S 3 <3 <4 <3 <3 <6 <6 <3' <3 <3' < 13 <4 l-932024 11S 2/93 11/30S 3 <2 <3 <2 .< 3 <5- <6 <2 <3 <2 < 11 <3 932209 11!30/93 01/04/94 <3 <3 <3 <3 <4 <6 <3 <3 <2 < 11 <4 1 l l , O =,CONTROt. LOCATION L *. = LOW LEVEL ANALY0t$, ~ "'-- ~ ~- ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
^_,i-f ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO.: 4 6 SAMPLE: SURFACE WATER, (H-3) COLLECTION: QUARTERLY COMPOSITE . UNITS: pCi/L LOCATION: DISCHARGE BASIN LAB NO. BEGIN DATE END DATE H-3 REO'D LLD 2000 930572 01105/93 0402/93 2560 +/-380 930573GG 01/05/93 04/02/93 2710 +/-390 931141 04/02/93 06/30/93 5440 +/-300 931694 06/30/93 10/01/93 4080 +/-270 932208 10/01!93 01/04/94 <540 4 t
- = CONTRC1. LOCATION PAGE' 35 4..
4 4 m.=.. ..2- .e mma mm w-e- m ew 4 .--w-s w r m w- -+-w-- w w-- .-e - = m. m.
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 5.1 SAMPLE: VEGETATION: BROADLEAF,(1-131, GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY WHEN AVAILABLE. .. UNITS: pClikg LOCATION: SECTOR K,17 KM LAB NO. COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE l-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 DATE REO'DLLD 60 60 80 930067 01/1493 COLLARDS <9 <8 <7 930068 01/1493 MUSTARDS < 21 < 17 < 18 930069 01/14/93 BRUSSELS SPROUT < 21 < 14 < 15 930076GG 01/1493 COLLARDS < 41 < 30 < 24 930077GG 01/1493 MUSTARDS < 12 <6 <8 930078GG 01/1493 BRUSSELS SPROUT < 19 < 15 <15 920253 02/09/93 COLLARDS < 16 < 13 < 14 930254 02/09/93 BRUSSELS SPROUT < 18 < 17 < 16 930255 02/09S 3 KALE < 29 < 22 < 21 930390 03/10S3 MUSTARD GREENS <10 <8 <7 930391 03/10/93 COLLARDS < 15 < 10 <9 930392 03/10/93 BRUSSELS SPROUT < 11 <9 <7 930627 04/1493 COLLARDS < 32 < 28 < 26 930628 04/1493 KALE < 25 < 22 < 23 930629 04/1493 CABBAGE < 19 < 18 < 19 930636GG 04/1493 COLLARDS < 34 < 30 < 28 930774 05/11/93 KALE < 14 < 13 < 12 930775 05/11 S 3 CABBAGE < 12 < 12 < 12 l 930776 . 05/11/93 BROCCOLI <16 < 14 < 13 l 930968 06/09/93 COLLARDS < 19 < 24 < 19 939969 06/09/93 RAPE' < 14 <16 < 14 l 930970 06/09/93 CABBAGE < 14 < 14 < 13 l' l i D = CONTROL LOCATION ' * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS se N - --
~ ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 51a ~ SAMPLE: VEGETATION: BROADLEAF,(1131 GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY WHEN AVAILABLE. UNITS: pCWg LOCATION: SECTOR K,17 KM LAB NO. COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE l-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 DATE REO*D LLD 60 60 80 931144 07/07/93 COLLARDS < 19 < 19 < 16 931145 07/07S 3 KALE < 23 < 15 < 16 931146 07107/93 BROCCOLI < 20 < 19 < 16 931346. 08/10S 3 SWISS CHARD < 22 < 22 < 18 931347 08/10/93 MUSTARD < 20 < 24 < 21 931348 OS/10S3 PEANUT VINES < 15 < 14 < 13 931483 0908/93 SWISS CHARD < 23 < 23 < 23 931484 09/08 S 3 COLLARDS < 17 < 22 < 18 931485 09/08S 3 PEANUTS & VINES < 18 < 19 < 17 931711 10/11 S 3 SWISS CHARD < 18 < 22 < 17 931712 10/11 S 3 COLLARDS = 15 < 20 < 18 931713 10/11/93 TURNIP GREENS < 1e < 17 < 16 931902 11/10S3 SWISS CHARD < 19 < 18 < 14 931903 11/10 S 3 COLLARDS < 18 < 17 < 16 931904 11/10S 3 MUSTARD GREENS - < 19 < 14 < 14 -932066 1209S3 KALE < 20 < 18 < 17 932067 12!09S3 RAPE < 16 < 17 < 19 932068 12 % '93 COLLARDS < 22 <16 < 14 I-
- = CONTROL LOCATION = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 37
-w
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORINn REPORT TABLE NO. : 5.2 SAMPLE: VEGETATION: BROADLEAF,(1-131, GAMMA) COLLECTION:MONTHLYWHEN AVAILABLE. UNITS: pCWg LOCATION: SECTOR J. 0 6 KM LAB NO. COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE l-131 Cs-134 - Cs-137 DATE REOV LLD 60 60 80 930070 01/1493 COLLARDS < 19 < 15 < 14 930071 01/1493 SWISS CHARD < 30 < 22 < 21 930072 01/14'93 CABBAGE < 20 < 15 < 13 930079GG 01/14/93 COLLARDS < 18 < 15 < 17 930080GG 01/1493 SWISS CHARD < 15 < 13 < 10 930081GG 01/14/93 CABBAGE < 14 < 11 < 10 930256 02/09/93 SWISS CHARD < 13 < 12 < 11 930257 02/09/93 COLLARDS < 19 < 16 < 15 930258 02M93 TURN!P GREENS < 20 < 14 < 14 930393 03/10/93 COLLARDS <8 <6 <5 930394 03/10/93 - SWISS CHARD <8 <8 <8 930395 03/10/93 MUSTARD GREENS < 14 < 13 < 11 930630 04/1493-SWISS CHARD < 16 < 13 < 12 930631 04/14/93 MEXICAN COLLARD < 16 < 14 < 15 930632 04/1493 HYBRIDCABBAGE < 15 < 15 < 15 930637GG 04/1493 SWISS CHARD <7 <7 <7 930777 05/11/93 SWISS CHARD < 30 < 22 < 21 -930778 05/11/93 HYBRID CABBAGE < 19 < 16 < 14 930779 05/11/93 DUTCH C# Dw ~ -<21 < 22 < 20 ' 930971 06! DSS 3 SWISS CHARD < 15 < 18 < 16 930972 06/09/93 SQUASH- < 17 < 17 < 16 930973 0609/93 CABBAGE < 17 < t7 < 16 i l l s = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS ^
g ENVIRONMEM :;.L RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO : 5.2a SAMPLE: VEGETATION: BROADLEAF,(1-131. GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY WHEN AVAllABLE. UNITS: pCWg LOCATION: SECTOR J. 0 6 KM LAB NO. COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 DATE REQ'O LLD 60 60 80 931147 07/07S 3 CROWDER PEAS < 20 < 21 < 20 931148 07/07S 3 CAULIFLOWER LVS. < 14 < 13 < 12 '931149 07/07 S 3 SWISS CHARD < 20 < 15 < 15 931349 08/1G93 SWISS CHARD < 15 < 13 < 13 931350 08/1G93 LIMA BEANS < 21 < 18 < 16 931351 08/1G93 SQUASH LEAVES < 13 <12 < 12 931486 09/0693 SWISS CHARD < 17 <16 < 17 931487 0908/93 EGGPLANT LEAVES < 24 < 25 < 22 931488 09/0&93 BUTTERBEANS < 17 < 19 < 22 931714 10/11/93 OKRA < 21 < 1B < 20 931715 1041S3 EGGPLANT < 22 < 22 < 18 931716 10/11 S 3 SW!SS CHARD < 16 < 17 <15 931905 11/1G93 SWISS CHARD < 19 < 22 < 21 931906 11/1063 MUSTARD GREENS < 17 <12 < 11 931907 11/1G93 TURNIP GREENS < 20 < 16 < 13 - 932069 12/09S3 BROCCOU < 17 < 15 < 13 932070 12KB93 CABBAGE < 18 < 16 < 14 932071 12KE93 CAULIFLOWER < 20 < 15 < 16 O =. CONTROL LOCATION * =_ LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 39 w__
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO.: 5.3 SAMPLE: VEGETATION: BROADLEAF. (1-131. GAMMA} COLLECTION: MONTHLY WHEN AVAILABLE. UNITS: pC1/kg. . LOCATION: SECTOR R. 1.2 KM LAB f40. COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE l-131 Cs-134 Cs-137
- DATF, REO*D LLD 60 60 80 930073 01/14/93 SWISS CHARD
< 21 < 17 <18 930074 01/1493 CABBAGE < 13 < t1 < 11 930075 01/1493 TURNIP GREENS < 14 < 12 < 12 ) 930082GG 01/1493 SWISS CHARD < 20 < 15 < 12 930083GG '01/1493 CABBAGE <8 <6 <6 930084GG 01/1493 TURNIP GREENS < 23 < 18 < 18 930259 02/OS93 TURNIP GREENS < 13 < 12 < 12 930260 02/0S93 COLLARDS < 18 < 17 < 16 930261 02/0&S3 MUSTARDS < 27 < 22 < 20 930396 03/1G93 SWISS CHARD < 11 <8 <7 930397 03/10/93 MUSTARD GREENS < 26 < 19 < 16 930398 03/10/93 COLLARDS <7 <6 <S 930633 04/1493 COLLARDS < 14 < 16 < 14 -930634 04/1493 CABBAGE < 13 < 12 < 11 930G35 04/1493 SWISS CHARD < 25 < 24 < 20 930638GG 04/1493 COLLARDS < 11 < 11 < 11 .930780 05/11193 SWISS CHARD < 19 < 17 < 17 930781 05/11/93 PHOTENIA < 21 < 21 - < 21 930782 05/11/93 LIGUSTRUM < 22 < 23 < 21 930974 06/09/93 HIBISCUS < 22 < 26 < 22 930975 06/0a93 LADY PEA <9 < 10 <9 930976 06/0S93 SQUASH LEAVES < 15 . < 13 < 13 O = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOWLEVEL ANALYSIS ~
~._.. ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO.: 5.3a SAMPLE: VEGETATION: BROADLEAF. (1-131, GAMMA) COLLECTION: MONTHLY WHEN AVAILABLE. UN6TS: pCUkg LOCATION: SECTOR R. 1.2 KM LAB NO. COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 DATE REO DLLD 00 60 80 931150 07J07/93 CROWDER PEAS < 27 < 20 < 18 931151 07/07/93 SQUASH LEAVES < 24 < 21 < 18 931152 0747/93 GREEN VEG. < 21 < 17 < 17 931352 08/10S 3 LADY PEAS < 19 < 22 < 20 931353 08/10 S3 BUTTER BEANS < 16 < 15 < 16 931354 08/10/93 TOMATO VINES < 17 < 15 < 17 931489 09/08S3 EGGPLANT LEAVES < 20 < 20 < 19 931490 0908/93 SWISS CHARD < 13 < 16 < 15 931491 09/08S 3 BUTTERBEANS < 18 < 19 < 16 931717 10/11/93 BUTTER PEAS < 22 < 21 < 18 931718 10/11/93 MUSTARD GREENS < 19 < 19 < 22 931719 10/11/93 EGGPLANT < 25 < 27 < 25 931908 11/10 S 3 - COLLARDS < 15 < 17 < 14 931909 11/10S 3 - SWISS CHARD < 18 < 18 < 15 931910 11/10/93 TURNIP GREENS < 16 < 15 < 16 932072 .12/0193 KALE < 22 < 20 < 16 932073 12/09/93 CAULIFLOWER - < 24 < 20 < 19 932074 12/09.93 MUSTARD GREENS < 28 < 22 < 19 i i = 0 = CONTROLLOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 41 = n.-
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOG! CAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO; 6.1 SAMPLE: M!LK SAMPLES, (1-131, GAMMA) COLLECTION: SEM1 ANNUALLY UNITS: pCLt LOCATION: ALCORN STATE LAS NO. COLLECTION 3-131* Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba 140 La-140 DATE REO'D LLD 10 15 18 60 15 931026 06/16/93 N/A <3 <3 < 12 <4 9310270G 06/16/93 N/A <3 <3 < 14 <4 931060 06/29/93 < 0.3 <3 <3 < 10 <3 931061GG 06/29 S 3 < 0.3 <3 <2 <8 <2 931901 11/10.'93 < 0.3 <3 <2 <8 <2 i i 4 __s _y COEliDNIL016re/MC=N ~ - ' - - ' - ~~ ~ ~
_ =. k ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. :7.1' SAMPLE; FISH SAMPLES, (GAMMA) COLLECTION: SEMIANNUALLY UNITS: pCVkg LOCATION : MISS. RIVER UP. LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE SAMPLE TYPE Ma-54 Fe-59 Ca58 C&60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 ? REQ'O LLO 130 260 130 130 260 130 150 9308S6 05T25/93 BUFFALO < 11 <16 < 12 < 12 < 28 < 14 < 13 930888GG 05/25 S3 BUFFALO < 18 < 23 < 18 < 18 < 44 < 20 < 19 931893 11/08S 3 CATFISH <9 < 13 <9 <9 < 23 < 11 < 10 - i f 1 ) I L M
- = CONTROL LOCATION ' * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 43
i ENV!RONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. ; 7.2 SAMPLE: FISH SAMPLES (GAMMA) COLLECTION: SEM1 ANNUALLY UNITS: pCng LOCATION : MISS. RIVER DOWN LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE SAMPLE TYPE Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-EO Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 REO'O LLD 130 260 130 130 260 130 150 930887 05/25S 3 BUT?ALO < 12 < 17 < 12 <12 < 29 < 13 < 12 930889GG 05/25/93 BLY FALO < 14 < 19 < 13 < 14 < 29 < 15 < 13 931894 11/08/93 CA 'P & GOU <8 < 11 <8 <8 < 18 <9 <8 4 e G = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS - L---
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO, ! 8.1 SAMPLE: SEDtMENT. (GAMMA) COLLECTION: SEMIANNUALLY UNITS:. pCLkg LOCATION LAB NO. COLLECTION Cr-51 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 CMO Cs-134 Cs-137 DATE REQ'DLLD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 150 180 SEDCOflT, UPSTREAM 931153 07/01 S 3 < 121 <9 < 20 < 10 <9 < 11 <8 SEDCONT GG*, UPSTREAM 931156 07/0163 < 123 < 10 < 21 <12 < 10 < 12 <9 SEDCONT. UPSTREAM 93tB62 11/02/93 < 64 <8 < 13 <7 <8 < 10 <8 SEDBAR. BARGE SLIP 931154 07/01/93 520 +/-278 154 +/-26 < 42 < 25 267 +/-30 < 27 137 +/ 18 SEDBAR GG", BARGE SLIP 931157 07/01/93 1067 +/-295 136 +i-20 < 45 < 27 330 +/-34 < 28 150 +/-21 SEDBAR. BARGE SLIP 931863 11/02193 423 +/-113 2250 +/-40 53 +/-35 143 +/-21 1631 +/-36 < 26 98 +/-18 SEDHAM, HAM.LTON L 931155 07/01/93 < 319 < 24 < 51 < 26 < 21 < 29 94 +/-22 SEDHAM GG" HAM!LTON L 931158 07/01/93 < 123 < 19 < 27 < 17 < 20 < 25 96 +!- 17 SEDHAM, HAMILTON L. 931864 11/02/93 < 113 < 13 < 20 < 12 < 13 < 16 64 +/-11
- = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 45 L
~ "-- ^
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT SAMPLE: SPECIAL ANIMAL MEAT. ( GAMMA) COLLECTION: AS REQUESTED. UNITS: pCWg LOCATION : BUCKSNORT CAMP LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE SAMPLE TYPE Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-SS Co-60 ZnES Cs-134 Cs-137 REO O LLD 130 260 130 130 260 130 150 930116 21/16?33 VENISON <9 < 13 < 10 <9 < 22 < 10 < 11 I 1 I 1
- = CONTROL LOCATION * = LCW LEVEL ANALYSIS
. -.._. _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - -. - - _..~ ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE No. 10.1 SAMPLE: SPECIAL SURFACE WATER, GRAB (GAMMA) COLLECTION: AS REQUESTED. UNITS: pCi/L LOCATION: OUTFALL # to LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn45 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba '40 La-140 REO'DLLD 15 30 15 15 3C 30 15 15 18 60 15 930220 02/04/93 <2 <3 <2 <2 <S <S <3 <0 <2 < 11 <3
- = CONTROL LOCATIOri
- = LOW LEVEL ANALYS!?
PAGE 47
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. 11.1 SAMPLE: SEWAGE SLUDGE (GAMMA) COLLECTION: AS REQUESTED UNITS: pCUkg LOCATION: SEWAGE PLANT DRYtNG BED LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE Cr-51 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co40 Cs-134 Cs-137 REO'O LLD t#A N/A PUA N/A N/A 150 180 930213 02/04G3 < 50 81 +/-10 < 10 <7 170 +/-12 <9 <8 930687 04f22/93 < 123 226 +/-27 < 27 < 20 594 +/-33 < 24 < 19 931332 08/02/93 <100 270 +/-22 < 22 < 15 607 +/-29 < 19 26 +/-13 931923 11/12/93 <74 36 +/10 < 12 <9 129 +/14 < 10 <9 l l l t
- = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT. TABLE NO. 12.1 SAMPLE: SPECIAL SEDIMENT, ( GAMMA) COLLECTION: AS REQUESTED UNITS: pCilkg LOCATION: BASIN A f LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE Cr-51 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 CW Cs-134 Cs-137 REO*D LLD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 150 180 930685 04/22/93 < 98 < 13 < 19 < 12 < 13 < 17 22 +/-9 .. j I
- = CONTROL LOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS PAGE 49
-= .)
3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE NO. : 12.2 SAMPLE: SPECIAL SEDIMENT, ( GAMMA) COLLECTION: AS REQUESTED UNITS: pCWg LOCATION: BASIN B LAB NO. COLLECTION DATE Cr-51 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs 137 REQ'DLLD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 150 180 930686 04f22/93 < 41 <7 <6 <5 <6 <6 <6
- = CONTROLLOCATION * = LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS u: ro
EPA CROSS CHECK RESULTS EPA PREP DATE MEDIA NUCL1DE EPA ES1, SYSTEh! NORM DEV. DATE RESULTS RESULTS CHEMISTRY KNOWN ISSUED RESULTS 10/20/92 02/26/93 WATER Bets 53.0 34.67 -3.18 *
- 1 BLIND B Co-60 15.0 15.00 0.00 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 5.0 5.33 0.12 Cs-137 8.0 9.33 0.46 02/05/93 04/20/93 WATER I-131 100.0 100.00 0.00 (pCi/L) 04/20/93 08/19/93 WATER Beta 177,0 154.33 -1.45 BLIND B Co-60 39.0 41.67 0.92 (pCi/L) Cs-134 27.0 26.00 -0.35 Cs 137 32.0 34.33 0.81 06/04/93 08/19/93 WATER H-3 9844,0 10453.33 1.07 (pCi/L) 06/11/93 08/27/93 WATER Co-60 15.0 15.33 0.12 GAMMA Zn-65 103.0 103.33 0.06 (pCi/L) Ru-106 119.0 107.00 -1.73 Cs-134 5.0 6.00 0.35 Cs-137 5.0 6.00 0.35 Ba-133 99.0 102.00 0.52 l 10/08/93 12/30/93 WATER I-131 117.0 117.67 0.10 (pCi/L) 08/27/93 12/30/93 AlR FILTER Beta 47.0 47.67 0.23 (pCi/ Filter) Cs-137 ' 9.0 8.67 -0.12 09/24/93 01/07/94 MILK I-131 120.0 118.00 -0.29 l GAMMA Cs 137 49.0 48.00 -0.35 f (pCi/L) K (Total) 1679.0 1636.00 -0.89 11/05/93 01/14/94 WATER 11 3 7398.0 6762.67 -1.49 (pCi/L) 1 "I A new efficiency curve was determined for the beta counter. Recalculation of the beta in water sarnple using the new efficiency curve gives results within the control lignits. ) 1
,,{,,, '[,--, ,1',,'. m__,.__ I,- + s.',,,,,/ N ,2' '\\"*i, g .a -'s i s 1,. 4 4 C l' ) l N ,--y ~ t-I J .? is ( _j] ?.' Y 1 , z
- g
~ ub:
- 7.3-
1 w: y' .c c _ e
- ]'-
. q; y i A M y A. 4 4.~ g 4 ,,'s /' -1 .y l N 1 p ? p L_, s..:; + 1 'N 'i q 4 e i " ATTACHMENTils ~ ^ - 1 ~ ' o %x e b '1993 TIIE' MOLUMI'NESCEST DOSIMETRY NEPORTj i R .m. - n+ 6 )' e 2 .,i Y ( 4 r II l ,,p, 'b' y y I I , I g. 1-. + u'.- 1 ._l, i ' ' W ~ ) / ( 6 y? k_ a t W v l 1 z 4,; - [ . -$. i \\ .e 'M ( :7 c + - <,b*.. e e j
- 'h',"'
'"- (,I. *., t S. i 5 ,'M'-., 4 ) k e ' ? ;- r x L. f p ~, - - - - - - _ - - - _ _. - - -. _ -. - - - - - - - -. - -. - _ -. _ _ - _. - - -.... - - -
d I + i GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION. t 1993 THEIDIOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY REPORT. JANUARY-DECEMBER' 4 ) I (-. ANALYSIS BY : Waterford-3 Dosimetrv j j I l
TABLEI INNER RING TLDs, WITIIIN TWO (2) MILE RADIUS REOUIRED BY ODCM SPECIFICATIONS - Location 1st Qtr ' 93 2nd Qtr ' 93 3rd QTR ' 93 - 4th Qtr ' 93 - (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) M-16 15.0 16.5 22.0 22.0 M-17 16.0 16.5 (3) 22.0 M-19 16.5 17.0 19.0 20.5 M-20 15.5 16.5 18.5 20.0 M-21 19.0 19.0 21.0 22.0 M-22 16.5 15.5 18.0 20.5 i M-23 17.5 14.5 20.0 21.5 M-25 12.0 9.5 13.5 16.5 M-27 (1) (2) 21.5 24.5 M-28 16.5 17.5 20.5 22.0 M-41 13.0 10.5 15.5 16.0 M-45 17.5 15.0 18.5 19.0 i M-86 16.0 19.5 19.5 20.0 M-92 13.0 15.5 17.0 17.0 M-93 15.5 20.0 21.5 21.0 M-94 15.0 19.0 20.5 19.0 [ Mean i s.d. 15.6 1.9 16.1 i 3.0 '
- 19.1 i 2.4 20.2 2.3 (1) Value not representative due to TLD being submerged below flood waters from 1-4-93 to 7-2-93.
(2) TLD not placed in field due to flood waters. (3) TLD missingin field. ( ) t w
i l TABLE 2 OUTER RING TLDs. WITIIIN SIX (6) MILE RADIUS j 7 REOUIRED BY ODCM SPECIFICATIONS Location - 'Ist Qtr ' 93 2nd Qtr ' 93 .- 3rd Qtr ' 93 4th Qtr ? 93 - (mrem) '(mrem) (. mrem) . mrem) ( M-36 16.0 15.5 18.5 20.5 }l M-40 18.5 15.0 22.0 22.0 M-47 16.0 14.0 18.5 18.5 M-48 16.0 16.5 21.0 21.0 M-49 18.0 21.5 22.0 22.0 M-50 17.0 17.0 (2) 20.5 M-51 16.0 (2) 18.0 19.5 M-55 17.5 19.0 20.5 23.0 .- l L M-56 16.0 18.0 20.5 22.5 l M-57 16.0 18.0 20.5 22.5 ( M-58 14.0 15.5 18.5 19.5 M-59 -13.0 12.0 17.0 19.0 M-88 0) (3) 14.5 15.5 M-89 11.5 17.0 16.0 18.0 M-90 14.5 13.0 18.5 18.0 l M-91 15.5 18.5 20.0 21.5 5 l
- Mean ' s.d.
15.'7 1.8 16.5 2.5 ( 19' 1 i 2.2 ~- 20.2' 2.1-i (1) Value not representative due to TLD being submerged below flood waters from 1-5-93 to 7-1-93. (2) TLD missing in field. (3) TLD not placed in field due to flood waters. f
i L TABLE 3 4 SPECIAL INTEREST AREA TLDs REOUIRED BY ODCM SPECIFICATIONS i Location 1st Qtr ' 93. 2nd Qtr ' 93. 3rd Qtr ' 93 4th Qtr '.93 (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) M-01 18.0 20.5 22.0 22.0 M-07 17.0 17.5 22.0 21.5 M-09 16.5 17.0 20.0 21.5 M 10 14.5 15.0 18.5 19.5 M-33 16.5 16.0 18.5 20.5 M 38 16.0 15.5 20.0 20.5 M-39 15.5 15.5 19.0 21.5-Mean i s.d.' 16.3 i 1.1' '16.7 i-1.9 20.051.5 21.0 i 0.9. I CONTROL TLD ( Location 1st Qtr ' 93 2nd Qtr ' 93 : 3rd.Qtr ' 93 - 4th Qtr ' 93 (mrem)._ (mrem).: . (m' rem) .(mrem) l M-14 17.5 18.0 22.0 21.5 SillELD TLD ' Location . Ist Qtr ' 93 2nd Qtr ' 93 3rd Qtr ' 93 - 4th Qtr ' 93 - (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) (mr'em) -. I M.00 6.0 7.0 11.5 11.0
k ) TABLE 4 PROTECTED AREA BOUNDARY NOT REOUIRED BY ODCM SPE, CIFICATIONS . LOCATION IST QTR ' 93. 2ND QTR ' 93. - 3RD QTR ' 93 4th Qtr ' 93 (mrem) - (mrem) - '(mrem) (mrem); M-61 24.0 28.5 29.0 23.5 1 M-62 33.5 42.5 34.0 30.0 ] M-63 16.5 21.0 19.5 23.0 I M-64 (1) 23.5 20.5 17.5 4 M-65 17.5 19.5 19.0 18.0 M-66 19.5 22.5 22.5 18.5 i M-67 19.5 23.5 23.0 20.5 M-68 38.0 63.0 45.5 29.5 M-69 54.0 69.5 58.0 31.0 i M-70 35.0 65.5 48.0 31.0 i M-71 15.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 M-72 14.5 18.0 17.0 16.5 M-74 14.5 16.5 19.0 17.0-i M-76 14.0 17.0 17.0 16.0 M-77 12.0 15.5 22.5 15.0 M-81 14.0 16.5 18.0 18.0 Mean i s.d. 122.8 i 12.0 30.0 19.0
- 26.9 i 12.8
-21)i5.8 DUPLICATE TLDs Location 1st Qtr ' 93 12nd Qtr ' 93 3rd Qtr ' 93 ' . 4th Qtr ' 93 J (mrem) (mrem). (mrem).: (mrem) M-31 17.5 14.5 18.0 19.5 M-32 16.0 15.5 18.5 20.0 M-60 14.5 16.5 20.0 22.5 Mean i s.d.~ 16.0 i 1.5 15 5 i 1.0 18.8 1.0 20.7 i 1.6 (1) TLD damaged in field due to water moisture. L. __-.__- ____________ _ _}}