ML20029C262
| ML20029C262 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 03/20/1991 |
| From: | Knop R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20029C261 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-91-03, 50-440-91-3, NUDOCS 9103270078 | |
| Download: ML20029C262 (1) | |
Text
'
1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Docket No. 50-440 Perry Nuclear Power Plant L;c & No. NPF-58 As a result of the inspection conducted on January 7 through February 28, 1991, anj in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1991) (Enforcement Policy),
the following violation was identified:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criteria V, required, in part, that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented procedures appropriate to the circumstances and be accomplished in accordance with those procedures.
Perry Administrattve Procedure (PAP)-0205, Revision 6, " Operability of Plant Systems," Section 6.1.2, required, in part, that prior to declaMy a system or component operable, the Unit Supervisor review the system configuration to insure that the system was in the applicable Standby Readiness or Secured status.
Electrical Lineup Instruction (ELI)-R23, Revision 3, "480 Volt Load Centers,"
paragraph 4, identified the required position of feeder breaker EF1812 as closed.
Contrary to the above, on January 29, 1991, the Division 1 containment hydrogen recombiner was restored to service, after review by the Unit Supervisor, with feeder breaker EF1812 open.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
(50-440/91003-10)(DRP)).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause
- shown, n
N$
/
Y Dited Richard C. Knop, Chief v
Reactor Projects, Branch 3 9103270078 910320 ADOCK 050 0
gDR