Text

Performance Indicators,Jan 1991
	ML20029B214
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	01/31/1991
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20029B213	List: ML20029B212; ML20029B214;
References
	NUDOCS 9103060209
	Download: ML20029B214 (104)
	v • d • e

_....

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY 1991 f'

yq-

Nt'fhifT lN:

Lame meeg

!IllR#mT' Mligiumimise e__m_._.memdh_.m.. yd. 5ihn

- -[

h 7

/

,1f

_/

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group i

J.hS3 ji?SEE $d0$f.fR3 n

4 0%al se saaBasun w aA auilad....

i a wwdm wisden, and sowndjud anad...

g d w a, bldians, cwm4ng cornaralanud...

c a w a, w<u,, of ofs,...d w de&ng Lja Al 9

L li m i %, w e aj, %.

a l w

^

Orvas-dimbd, rol L wall of udeunal g_, a w.

- ge wa,sw.

- - a.s u ad i s p.

r LL censlwn, owng L kl 9

knd of pesos, roijud on, do&ng & 911 Uaaap.

jana ). 6%ner C

l

Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group January 1991 l

s

Fort Calhoun Station Performance indicator Report ABSTRACT PURPOSE The ' Performance indicat )rs Program' is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is preser,t id in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comptrison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being repurted, unless otherwise stated, in order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Select data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.

31 include established corporate goals and industry it'.formadon for comparison.

4) Develop formal definitions for each ptrformance paramete:, Thic will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages wher) appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program it, tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report, Please refer comments to the Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departrnents.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102, ' Performance Monitoring Management Informatir4 INPO Report Dated November 1984, ' Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data' NUMARC 87 00, ' Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at t.ight Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D, 'EDG Reliability Program *, dated Apr;i 6,1990.

l l

l i

._~

, _., =,

n- -..

Fort Calhoun Station PorformOnce indicator Roport Table of Contents JUDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS PAGE 1

ForcedOutaoeRate.................................................................................................2 J

Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical.................................................. 3 Unplanned Safety System Actuations(INPO Definition).....................

......................,u....

4 Unplanned Safe:y System Actuations(NRC Definition).................................................... 5 GrossHeatRate.......................................................................................................,0 E q ui val e n t A v a il a bili t y F a c t o r...................................................................................... 7 F u el R e li a bilit y in d i e a t o r........................................................................................... 6 Personnel Ra diation E xpus ure (Cumula tive)............................................................... 9 Volume o f Lo w le vel Solid Ra dio a cti ve Wa s t e.............................................................. 10 Dis ablin g inj ury Fr e Q u e ncy R a t e................................................................................ 1 i OPERATIONS S t a ti o n N e t G e n e r a tio n.............................................................................................. 1 ForcedOutageRate.................................................................................................2 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical...................................................... 3 Unplanned Saf ety System Actuations. (INPO Definition)................................................ 4 Unplanned Saf ety System Actuations (NRC Definition).................,,................................

5 GrossHeatRate..................................s.....................................................................O E q ui val e n t A v a il a bilit y F a c t o r...................................................................................... 7 Fu e i R eli a blfi t y i n d ic a t or........................................................................................... 8 D ail y Th e r m a l O ut p ut............................................................................................... 1 2 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours......................................................

13 O pe ra tions a nd M sin t enanc e Buc o a t.......................................................................... 14 D o C u m e n t R e vi e w................................................................................................... 1 5 MAINTEN ANCI-E me rg e ncy Die s el G en era t or Unit Relia bility................................................................. 16 Die s eI G e no rst or R elia bility (2 5 0 em a nd s)................................................................... 17

_ A g e o f O uts t a ndin g M ain t e n a nc e Work....................................................................... 18 M ain t e n a nce Wor k O rd e r Br e a kd o wn................................................................. o...... 19 Corrective M aintenance Bac klog > 3 M onth s Old......................................................... 2 0 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance.................................................................. o 21 I

MAINTENANCE (con't)

EA.GI.

Pr e ve n tive M aint e n anc e it ern s O v e r d ue.................................................................... 2 2 Number of Out of. Service Controf Room Instruments............................................... 23 M sin t e n a n e e O ve rt ime........................................................................................... 2 4 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)...................................................... 2 5 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Cortective Non Outage)......................................... 26 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Acdvities:

( Ele ettical M a inten a ne e)................................................................................. 2 7 i

( Pr e s s u r e E Q u lp m e n t ).................................................................................. 2 8 (G en e ral M a in t e na n e e ).................................................................................. 2

( M ech a nie al M a int en a nc el.............................................................................. 3 0 (In s tr um e nt a tion & Control)............................................................................ 31 Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.................................. 32 Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data Systeni (NPRDS) Reportable Failures.................. 33 M ainte n a ne e E t f e etIve n e s s........................................................................................ 3 4 Ch e c k Va l ve F ailu r e R a t e........................................................................................ 3 5 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAt_ PROTECTION Pers onnel Ra dia tion E x pos ur e (Cumula tive).................................................................. 9 Volume of Low.le vel Solid Radioactive Wa ste............................................................. 10 S e c on d a ry S y s t e m C h e mi s t ry.................................................................................... 3 0 Primary System Chemistry. Percent of Hours Out of Lirr t..............................;............. 37 Auxiliary Systems Chem 2stry Hours Outside Station Limits............................................ 38 in Line Che mis try In strume nts O ut of.S e rvic e.............................................................. 3 9 H a z.t rd o u s Wa s t o Pr od u c e d....................................................................................... 4 0

- M a ximu m Individ u al Ra dia tio n E x posure....................,,................................................ 41 Total Skin a nd Clo t hing Con ta mina tion s...................................................................... 4 2 De c ont a mine t e d A u xilia ry Buildin g.......................................................................... 4 3 R a diological Wor k Practic e s Pro g ra m..;....................................................................... 4 4 Number of Hot "

..........................................................................................45 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Doing Discharged to the Environment.................................. 46 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.................................... 47 ii

,, ~ _,

Fort Calhoun Station Porformance indicator 9eport Table of Contents 2

SECURITY PAGE Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Securityh..................

............................................48 S e c u ri ty incid e n t Br e a kd o w n................................................................................... 4 9 i

S e c u rity S y s t e m F a ilu r e s.......................................................................................... 5 0 MATERIALS AND OUTS!DE SERVICES Amoun t o f Work On H old A waitin g Pa rt s................................................................... 51 S p a r e Pa rt s i n v e n t o ry V a l u e........................................................................... 5 2 S p a r e Ps rt s i s s u e d................................................................................................. 5 2 i n v e n t ory A e c u r a cy............................................................................................... 5 3 StockoutRate........................................................................................................53 Wa r e h o u s e R e c e ipt s............................................................................................. 5 4 Warehouseissues...................................................................................................55 Wa r c h o u s e R e t u r n s.................................................................................................. 5 6 Ula t e rial R e ove:ts A waitin g A pp ro val........................................................................ 5 7 E x p o d it e d Pu r c h a s e s................................................................................................ 5 7 l n V ol C e Br e a k d o wn................. 4............................................................................... 58 M a t e rla I R e Q u e s t Pla nnin g......................................................................................... 5 8 DESIGN ENGINEERING O ut s t a n d in g M od i fic a tio n s........................................................................................ 5 9 T e m p o ra ry M odi fic a tion s.......................................................................................... 60 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR'sh................................................ 61 E n gin e e ring Ch a n p e N otic e Statu s............................................................................. 6 2 En gin e e ring Cha no e N o tic e Br eakd o wn...................................................................... 6 3 IND8JSTRIAL SAFETY Di s a blin g injury Fr e a venc y Ra t e................................................................................. 1 1 Ree ord a ble Injury C a s e s Froque ncy Ra to..................................................................... 6 4 HUM AN RESOURCFJ Number of Personnel Errors Report ed in LERs.............................................................. 6 5 i

P e r s o n n el T u r n o v e r R a t e........................................................................................... 6 6 S t a f fi n g L e v e l......................................................................................................... 6 6 1

l I

k$h 4

1 TRAINfNG AND OUALIFICATION fAftL SR O / R O Lic ens e E x a mina tion Pa s s Ra tio................................................................... 6 7 Lie e n s e C a n d id a t e E x a m s.........................................................................................

Hotlines...............................................................................................................69 Cla r r oom (Ins tru e t or) H our s..................................................................................... 7 T stal H our s o f S tud ent Tra inin p................................................................................. 71 REFUELING OUTAGE MWO O verall S ta tus (19 91 Ref ueling Outa o el............................................................. 72 Progress of 19 91 Outa ge Modifica tion Planning.......................................................... 73 O verall Project S tstus (19 91 He f ueling Outa ge).......................................................... 74 OUALITY ASSURANCE Number of Viola tions per 1000 Inspection H ours........................................................ 7 5 Cumulative Violations and Non Cit ed Violations (NCV's)............................................... 70 Outstanding Corrective Action R eports (C AR's)........................................................... 7 7 Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Re ports......................................................... 7 8 Corr e ctive Action Re port s Curren t S ta t u s.................................................................... 7 9 CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported...... 80 P E R F O R M AN C E IN DIC AT O R D E FINITIO N S............................................. s.................... 81 d

INDEX TO S AFETY Ef(!,16NCEMENT PROGR AM iSEP) INDIC ATORS............................... 90 PERFORM ANCE INDICATOR REPORT DISTRIBUTION tlST............................................ 92

SUMMARY

SECTION A d v e r s e T r e nd R e p o rt................................................................................... 9 3 Indicators Needing increased Management Attention......................................... 93 Perf ormanc e indicator Report Improveme nts..................................................... 9 5 1

I av i

l l.

j-t j

l s

So.

C Net Generation (10,000 Mwhours) i v

(

40-35 1 31.27 1

i

.30-

~

,M s

/

26.89 27.26

g'-

t aw

s 24.1s f

~ T.:

3B.

4 24 78 u-u,.

g c ;

my

.h

{'41} "**

' M.

3 y

e a

20 -

w r.

N.

w; Q

e up

[

M

@lM VN

)

M

{

10.3c 0

g g

i;

$g 4

i.42 fi DQ yh

ll%

1Ry C

1 -

q 10-i?hN

~ y

.eg rg4 n

b" d

@u i0 dM l

g i

$f d$

y d

s L g g

gN l d M

h

,5 o

o

.47 i

0 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the report-ing month.

~ During the month of January 1991, a net total of 247,63d,9 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. The net generation of the plant was. low during Janu-ary due to 190.8 forced outage hours being reported These forced outage hours were reported as a continuation of a Control Element Mechanism (CEDM) housing leak fcrced outage which began in December 1990.

Data Source:-

Station Generation Report Adverse Trend: None i

1 i

...u.

2..._,...

.. n..

a

10'

- Forced Outage Rate O-Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4)

-O-Industry Uppor 10 Percentile (0.25) 12-GOOD 9.7 l

m 4

9+

6a 6-ni hk W

3l@.

0-O- -- O -

-O--

O - - O -

-O -

O-O-O-O-

'O-O 1,4

? $$}

0 0 R

-g__

g _.g_....O O G-O - D

_p--Q_

'88 '89 '90 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 FORCED OUTAGE RATE Thr: forced outage rate was reported as 11.9% for the last twelve months. The rise in the forced outage rate for the Fort Calhoun Station during the month of January was due to 190.8 forced outage hours being reported during January due to a CEDM housing leak.

The 1991 goal for forced outage rate is 2,4%. To achieve this goal FCS cannot be off line more than 19 hours2.199074e-4 days 0.00528 hours 3.141534e-5 weeks 7.2295e-6 months for tha remainder of 1991.

Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: The forced outage rate has been rising since July 1990. This rise in the forced outage was due to four forced outages which occurred in August; September and continued into October; November; and December which carried into January. The first forced outage was due to seal problems encountered in reactor coolant pump RC 3A, the second forced outage was due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities, the third forced outage was due to an instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building, and the fourth forced outage was due to a CEDM housing leak.

2

i i

j 3-

-o-Fort Calhoun Goal 3

-s-Industry Upper 10 Percentile i

FCS Reactor Scrams i

?

3 j

2-3. o..._o _ o _ ou_ o _ o o.-___o _ o _ o _ o

\\

T b

\\

1 a

\\,

0 0 0 0

\\

0 -O -

0 0

0

-- O O --

-0 0-

'87 '88 '89 '90 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL

- There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in January. It has been 1,674 days sinca the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurred on July 2, 1986._

The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at zero.

The industry _' upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on_an annual basis.

-Thu Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear _ plant

_ performance in this area.

Data Source:

Plant License Reports (LERI 3

.i 1

3

-.u.- -. -

~

=

3-C Safety System Actuations

+ Fort Calhoun Goat

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-GOOD h

1-m

-i}f gw T.,

)

Eij s

05'-O G-G G

O G

O-G G--G (9--

0 0

a 5

'40 '69 '90 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun JW Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan01 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system cetuations during the mnnth of January 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number di unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percontile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percontile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

DLta Source:

Pl6nt License Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None 4

i h) Safety Systern Actuations (SSA) 12 Month Running Total SSA j

-- - Critical Hours s

1 10-1000 I

8-800 gh{6-y p..,

j ~.... -- ;

,. ~,

\\/

v i

l

\\

,.. A 7,

V i

600 i

en D

\\

\\.

l 9

\\

% Ll.

\\

o 2

i

'\\

l

'\\ l

]

4-

\\

l

\\l

-400$

)

%e

\\

l 1

\\

2 l

\\

[

2-200 j

I 1

1 1

i i,,j j /

b

/ i

'i; C o

0

-O

'80 '90 FMAMJJAS0ND JFMAMJJASOND J

-1989 1990 1991 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION) i This indicator shows the number of safety system actuations (SSA's) which in-clude the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection i

Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSA's includes act' ations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems u

for these safety systems are challenged.

The last event of this type occurred in November 1990 when Diesel Generator D 1

. and Diesel Generator DG 2 experienced anticipatory starts when the turbine was tripped due to a forced shutdown of the plant. This forced shutdown was due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Guilding.

The majority of SSA's displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation---

Reduction Program.:The goal of this Program is to reduce the number of SSA's at

' Fort Calhoun.

-Data Source:

Plant License Event Reports (LER)

~ Adverse Trend: None

~

5

13 -

9 Monthly Grot,s Heat Rate

-A-Year to Date Gross Heat Rate

-O Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goa!

12

-G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile am 8

3 11 -

f' GOOD 10270 10$20103o4 l.Ig.' '

e r-iGh -o---o -o -o -

-o - o - - o-- - o - - o-

-o- -o to-f

-O O

O e

O O

9 D

0 0

D y:

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb~ Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 GHOSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,345 BTU /

KWH during the month of January.

The vear to date gross heat rate was reported as 10,345 BTU /KWH.

The gross heat rate value for the month of January was high oue to a start up after a forced outage which occurred in December 1990 and continued into Janu-ary 1991.

The above year end Fort Calhoun goal (10,150 BTU /KWH) is the theoretical best gross heat rato that can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station during 1991.

The gross heat reta industry upper ton percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.

Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 6

i C Monthl EAF

/

- Year to-Date EAF

+ Fort Calhoun Year to Dato Goal

, Industry Upper 10 Percentile g..... D - - D --- D - O - D -- - -D--- G -

0 O 66 O

O O

-O

-0 0

0 - O - &-

O 56660%-

A 0000 40%-

4 20% -

0%

=

= - - - - - -

'88 '89 $0 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 01 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The EAF was reported as 59.4% for the month of January. The EAF value for the month of January was low due to 190.8 forced outage hours being reported dur-ing January. This forced outage occurred due to a CEDM housing leak.

The year to date EAF was reported as 59.4%

The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.

The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%

Data Source:

Dietz/Parra (Manager /Snurco)

Adverse Trends: None 7

i f

6-t

- Fuel Reliabmty indicator j

-G-Fort Calhoun Goal (1.4) l

-0 Industry Uppet 10 Percentile (.04)

{

-e Industry Median (2)

L l

B 4' 6

GOOD I

i i

2.4 l

T i

spy 2-4 o

o o

-o--o o

6 o

4 l

Q"m w,C 1.6 1.s I

-6...o... o...o....o....o....o_...o....o

...o...o

.o

?

Yk 4

lii l

C YM3

-0

- 0 " - O "- O =

-O Cl--G - D-

'O O'

Oa'- 0 --

'O-P

}

'88 89

'90 Janet. rob Mar Apt May Jun Jul Aug Sep od Nov D0:01 i

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR i

The FRl was reported as 1.47 nanocuries/ gram for the month of January. This INPO indicator uses an industry normal! red letdown purification rate._ The FRI was also calculated using Fort Calhoun's actualletdown purification rate. The FRi value using the plant's 'actualletdown purification rate was reported'as 2.18 nanocuries/

i gram.

i The 1991 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.4 nanocuries/ gram.

l

.The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/

gram.

Data Source:.

Hothaus/Lofshult Adverse Trend: None J

-8, r.--.-..,

-.-._,,.m....

~

Personnel Radiation Exposure (Man Rem) 400 -

..o..

Fort Calhoun Goal

- D --

Industry Upper 10 Percentito 300 -

G - -- - G --- --O - -- - & - - -- O - - ~ ~ O - -- O ~ ~ - - O - ~ ~ - & - - - - G - -- - -O - - - ~ & - - - - O 200 -

D

- D --

-D--

0-

-D--D-

-D-

-- O

-D D-D

-D-0 100 -

0'"

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

Durin0 January 1991,7.2 man rom was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulativo) during 1991 ls 250 man rem.

The personnel radiation exposure Industry upper ton percontilo is 166 man rem por unit por year.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverso Trond: None SEP 54 e

\\

9

4 Monthly RadioactNe Oli(in Gallons) Sent For Processing l

l Monthly Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing I

I Monthly Radioa:tive Waste Buried Cumulative RadioactNe Waste buried

~

'N' o-Fort Calhoun Goal For Waste Burlod IndJstry Upper 10 Percentile 100;,0 -

~

B GOOD

=

y 63 m

y sooo.

o.... o.. ~ o... + _ o.... o... +....e.... o.... o....o.... o p

4310 dO M~

A:h a--O-O -O_a--a -

O-.-a-0 -a-~O--a kk Yih M'

i W

-g.?j i

W n

M M

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct - Nov Dec91 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The Volume of Low Level Solid Radioactive Waste Indicator has been chanDed.

-Two new categories have been added to the above graph. One of these categories is the volume of radioactive oil which has been shipped off site for processing. The other category which has been added is the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been shipped off site for processin0 Volume of radioactive oil shipped off sitefor processing (pallons) 2,420.0 Amount of solid radioactive waste shippedoff site for processing (cubic feet) 2,560.0 Volume of ralid radioactive waste which was bur!ed during the month (cuble feet) 0.0 Cumuistive volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) 0.0 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 158.1 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been

' buried is 4,500 cubic feet.

The iridustry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987 and 1988.

Data Source:

Patterson/Breur (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 10

1-l C 1991 Disabling injury Frequency Rate

+ 1990 Disabling injury Frequency Ra'e

- 5 Year Average Disabling Injury Frequency Rate GOOD

,g.

-o Fort Calhoun Goal

-+-- Industry Upper 10 Percentile

.6 ~

/,h g

/\\

/

\\

\\/.A 6

l b

u

.4 -

o --o

-o -- o - -o ~

-o-- -o - o -- o-o-

o-

-o

.2 -

/

i 0

/_

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY FREOUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the current monthly disabling injury rate in colurnn form. The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate and the FoM Calhoun Station 5 year average d!sabling injury frequency rate are also shown. There were zero disabling injuries toported at the Fort Calhaun Station in January. The total number of disabling injuries that have been reported during 1991 is zero, The 1991 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31%

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is OE The year end disabling injury frequency rates for 1988,1989, and 1990 were 1.6, 0.4, and 0.5 respectively.

Data Source:

Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 26 11

l l Fort Calhoun Unmot 1495 MW Goal I

l Thornal output Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit 1500-1200-900-600-l 300 -

l l

0 1

3 5

7 9

11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 l

DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT i

The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt everage technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal that was not met.

The porcent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station during January 1,1990 through January 6,1990 was OE The plant was shutdown during this time frame due to a forced autogo concerning a CEDM housing leak. The plant was then put l

back on line and operated at approximately 100%

Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Nono 12

2-

- Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8 -

1.6 -

1.4 -

1.2 -

GOOD 1-4

.s<

.6 -

.53 I.4-

~

.13 I

- 0

'88

'89

'90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au0 Sep Oct Nov Doc EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There was one equipment forced outage reported during the month of January 1991. The CEDM housing leak forced outage resulted in 190.8 forced outage hours being reported.

The last equipment forced outage occurred in November of 1990 and was due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities.

Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) 13

80-O Actual Operations Expensturos ($ Million)

-- Operations 1991 Budget

['

/-

40-

,/.

/

f 20- 4.6.1/,./

oI N Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc

] Actual Maintenance ExpondituIos ($ Million)

~

/

20-Maintenanco 1991 Budget

/

15-

/

10-

.4, 0

=

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DVDGET The Operations and Maintenanco Bud 0ct Indicator shows the budget yea, to dato as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.

The bud 0et year-to date for Operations was 6 4 million dollars for January while the actual cumulativo expenditures through January totaled 4,8 million dollars.

The bud 0ct year to date for Maintenance was 1,5 million dollars for January while the actual cumulativo expenditures through January totaled 491 thousand dollars.

Data Source:

Gleason/ Parent (Manager /Sourco)

Adverso Trends: None 14

1500 -

-- Documents S:heduled for Review

Documents Reviewed 3

i Overdue Do:uments 1200-

-j 8

000 '

!\\

l \\

\\

j

\\,

l

\\

600 -

l

\\

l

\\

l

\\

t l

\\

l i

i 300 -

l

\\l l

\\l

\\

Y. - -*

\\

X

~

- -ak,, s....

y-Fot90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Se; Oct Nov Dec Jan91 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of biennial reviews completed during the report-Ing month, the number of biennial reviews scheduled for the reporting month, and the number of biennial reviews that are overdue. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Mainte-nance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operatiri0 Manual.

During January there were 85 document reviews completed while 13 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of January, there were 83 document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of January consisted primarily of Operations documents.

During the month of January there were 25 new or renamed documents reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993. -

Data Source:

Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None SEP 46 15

in.A' End of Month Trigger Values Fot.

E Number of Failures'20 Domands

_. 20 Demands L;;j Number of F611uros30 Domands

-50 Demands 10 l

l Number of Failures /100 Demands 100 Demands

+

g.

6-4-

3 3

2-22, 20, tt 92 2

2l 7

(

j d

U O

0=

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jut 91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graphs show three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are triggar values which corre-spond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diosol generators have obtained a reliability of greator than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger values The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load runs for both Diesel Gonorators combined. The number of start domands include al! valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only domands and all start domands that are followed by load run domands, i

whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run domands must follow suc-cessful starts and meet at least one of the following; a load run that is a result of a realload signal; a load run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications; special tests In which a diosol generator was expected to be operated for a minimum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).

The last 2 demand failures occurred in the month of June 1990 and were due to problems w:th DG 1's static excitor voltage regulator.

Data Source:

Diesel Generator Log Adverse Trend: None 16

l l

[_] DG 1 Failures /25 Domands 5*

C DG 2 Failuros25 Domands I

-- Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4-3-

2 2

1-0 0-=

Nov96 000 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITV (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel 00nerator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown, it must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diosol generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. Those actions are de-scribed in the Definition Section. A Standin0 Order will be drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

i Diosol Generator DG 1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 de-mands on the unit.

Diesel Generator DG-2 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 de-mands on the unit.

Adverso Trond: None 17

l i

400 -

l l! I November 19930vtstanding MWO's I

I

[

j December 19900utstandingMWO's W January 1991 Outstanding MW0i I

300-i i

= 200 -

e I

itih, e 49 i

$$k I

100 -

j g

I I

I

-p 1

W :_

@f[fl l

l S

p@

MW T "N i

0 l

03 Months

- 3 6 Months 6hMonths 912 Months

>12 Months i

l-l-

' AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage meintenance work orders' (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Sovce:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)-

I Adverse-Trend: None

'f

.s b

'18'

400]

l

) November 1990 l

l l December 1990 300-R Januay 1991 l

200 -

1 i

.1..'

l

]

r

\\

.\\i: w l

= ' '

I I

I - 11D-0 Total Open Total Opon Open Open M W O's Opon Satoty High M W O's

> 3 Months Safety Rotated Priority Old Related MWO's MWO's MWO's

> 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWO's remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key

. categories.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 19

. -.. = -

.. ~

1 i

i

- Corrective Maintenence Backlop 3 Months Ok!

en. IndustryUpperQuartile T ~

l i

n 3

60% - N a_ a _ a _ a_2a._ a_;_ a- _a, _ a _. a _

a 40% -

r 1

20%

Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct.

Nov Dec Jan91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GRE/.TER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.

- The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that are L

. greater than three months old at the end of January was reported as'40.6.%

The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8% The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the

. upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source:

- Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

_ Adverse Trend: None 1

20

l Ratio of PreventNe to Total Maintenance m-

-o - Industry Upper Quartse -

Fort Calhoun Goal m.

70%-

60% -

O-- -G-

~ O -- v

- - - - -C+ - - - - G -

- -O- - - - -G - - - - - D

o...-o-.~- o -..a.- - a

. o - o.

---O-- - O -

a.

- o.

o..

v.

o 50% -

40% -

30% -

m Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Od Nov Doc Jan91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station decreased to 41.0% in January. The low ratios in August, September, October, December, and January were due to the increased involvement of maintenance in corrective maintenance activities associated with the forced outages which occurreo during these months.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than GO E The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None - Reason for trend is given above.

SEP 41 21

- Prwentive Maintenance iterns Overdue

- [

{- Industry Upper Ostile 4g.

FortCahounGoay1.2%)

GOOD 3% -

Y 3% -

2% -

i 2% -

-D D

D D

D 1% -

J 1% -

.h T

1 1

E 7

Feb9^

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

_Dec Jan91

~ PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and exe.

cution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percontage of preventive -

maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive -

maintenance tasks as programs require, During January 1991,853 PM ltems were comp Zero PM's were not com-pleted within the allowable grace period.

The Fort Calh'oun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%. The Fort Catho_un Station is currently performin'g in the industry upper quar-tile for this indicator.

. Data Source:

Patterson/ Linden (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41-22

.~.

a 40-R Total Cont i Room Instruments Out of Service

--G-Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out of Service Instruments Lo-- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of Servico Instruments 30 30-29 m

29 Y

[

3 27 m

N..,

m/

25 w

.d' J

Qf ff 23

??

sM:fr' 23 y

W

b..,

b-IN D

N

~

21 W~

$"i b.

?p R

q+sd M

.d C;

4; 3i c

20 -

P T

W 4~'

i 84 K

T!

15 %

&;w M4

%gy W' ' P) w m.

n o

kh 6

idf F 4 Off Q*"#. W m }i 1rly WM mm 15 M

d h

i%

Y$

h'"

h

?

Y

~h':

~

ip 4y ap qL

%g a

nr

%e%

11 su

~n y

m M

am ss

?

m$N FT

h..hsqj ME "W

$1 c

W i..,

4h Vg gh m%..a 10-r*H

,. 3, bg S:

4..y", l

-Q M.m s A e~ -

W~,

g,s'

,' m i

x s

-q y

a m

~

M-,f

@M j

iGj A

L t L

O!

2--

t W

M y

%f

. F[M M, q N

!; ag

h;)

}l

}*

3d u?

Sd hh ffh

'}$): %*M l

r,i;R'f "k

Ws r -

e6

.1 1 :

;e

E

_&

W

(( 3 9.:

ht o

m Feb90 Mar Apr May

-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l Poi NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS TNs indicator shows the twmber of out of service control room instruments, the -

industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

- There was a-total of 27 out-of service control room instruments at the end of

--January.- A plant outaOn is required to repair 11 of these 27 control room instru-ments.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to hav; L J an 15'out of service control room instru--

i ments. The industry upper quartin.

tfor the number of out of service control-room instruments is 7.

D,na Source:

Patterson/ Adams (Manager / Source)

Aciverse Trend:- None 23

'l

b a.

- Maintenance Overtine

-it-12 Month Average

~

e-FortCalhounGoal 4

GOOD M-4

p......q 40% -

\\,

\\

g s

e _ _ _ _.o _ _ _ _ _ o. _ _.. _ e. _ _...e... _ _.e--.... o _ _ _. _ o 20% - y#

x,

/

0%

Feb90 Mar =

Apr -

May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

-Nov Dec Jan91

-MAINTENANCE OVERTIME

.ne Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired T.alntenance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.-

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 11.0% during the month of January 1991. The 12 mo_ nth average percentage of overtime hours with res,1ect to normal hours was reported as 17.8%.

The high percentage of overtime hours reported for the. month of January 1991-f was due to increased maintenance support associated with the force'l outage which occurred in December 1990 and continued into January 1991.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non-outage. months and E0% for outage months.

I Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)-

Adverse Trond:. None 24

. -.. ~.-..

. ~. -. _ -.

i 15-C Open IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Mainterance) e Closed IR'6 Reiated to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) l l Procedural Norcompliance IR's (Maintenance) 10-8,{

O n

,N i

5-N-d U

14

^

h 3

3 3

i N

r H

i 2

l 2 2

2 2

2 h

4 d-U u

~~

w 1 J 1-1 S

11 n

a 7

fi m

d:

f y

~

[

d ij o b 0 b 0 000 000

- 0 OO 00

' 00 Feb90 Mar Apr _

May Jun Jul.

Aug Gep -

Oct Ney Dec Jan91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of identified Maintenance incidents Reports (IR's)

-that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed IR's that are re-lated to the use of procedures (includes IR's that were caused by procedural non-

. compliance), and the number of closed IR's that were caused by procedural non-compliance.

It should be noted that the sermd and third columns will lag behind the first col-umn until the-IR's are closev i reporting method is due to the pacess in which

lR's receive category codes.

'f., receive their category codes when they sre-

- closed.

-D'ata Source:.

Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

~

' Adverse Trend: None SEP 15~& 44 25 y

800 -

Open WYO's

--o-FortCalhounGoa!

700 -

600 -

- o---- - o - -- --o - -- - o - - - - -s- - - - - o - - - - -q

\\

N, 500-

'h - - -- o ---- -o - -- - o,

s,-

N O N

- e.

B 300-200 Feb90: Mar Apr.

May Jun

'Jul Aug Sep Od Nov Dec Jan91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG

-(CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE) i This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage maintenance work orders that are open at the end of the reporting month.

At the end' of January 199_1_, there were 293 corrective non outage maintenance work orders remaining open,-_

The goal for this indicator _is to have less-than '450 corrective non outage mainte-nance work orders remaining open.

- Data Sourcei Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

- Adverse Trend: None -

SEP 36 26 1

l 1

I

~

k.

F 4-Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)

- G-Fort Calnoun Goal 100%-.

a I

- - ---- O - - ---0--- O 4- -

80% ( --- + -

60% -

b \\l y1 l

1 j

40% -

[I l

l l-i

- 9 l<

1

! Forced Forced i

20% "

Outage Outage i

~

l' 0%

11/11-.11/18 11/25 12/2, 12/9 12/16-.12/23' 12/30-1/6 1/13 1/20

-- 1/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ' ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of.the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning-Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's,- calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities..

LThe Fort Calhoun' Station goal for this indicator'is 80%-

^

Week Endino

_,A of Comoteted Scheduled Activities -

o

,01/06/91; 48 01/13/91 88

01/20/91-84

'01/27/91-

-73

Data Source:-

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)-

. Adve%-Tii7.J. None -

SEP 33.

t 27 1

Completed Scheduled ActMties (PE) Fort Calhoun Goal

~

100% "

3 ia

_.o.J._.m_.. _,-_

% _.o.p _o___. o.._.._. o __

sos

._ o.._.

{

60% -

I I

l l

i 40% -

-->l l<-

>l i

Forced

' Forced 1

20% "

l Outage Outage-1 0%

~

11/11-11/18 11/25 12/2 12i 12!16 12/23 12/30-1/6.

1/13 1/20 1/27.

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concernin0 Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities, i

The Fort Caihoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Week Endinal

% of Comoteted Scheduled Activities '

01/06/91 71

.01/13/91 92-01/20/91 88 01/27/91 78' Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Mant.ger/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None.

SEP 33 28'

f Completed Scheduled ActMties (GM)

-O Fort Calhoun Goal 100%

4 80% O- -O O- -On 4

0 ---- --G - - 4 - -O---O i

I f

x 60%--

-[

x - -

j j

i L40% -

i

-+:

g l

Forced Forced 20%~

Outage Outage i

I' gg 11/11-11/18 11/25 _12/2

12/9 12/16 12/23' 12/30 1/6 1/13 1/20

'1/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

'This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's,.

PMO's, calibrations, and mis'cellaneous maintenance activities..

i The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

~

Week Ending :

% of Co noleted Scheduled Activities 01/06/91 50

~ 01/13/91 -

69 01/20/91:

75 1

01/27/91 67 Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

)

Adverse Trond:: None

_SEP 33 29

Completed Scheduled Activities (MM) Fort Calhoun Goal 100% --

t 80% $s

- D+ j

! !/- -~~-O--O-

-- D-- /

-O O '----- G - D--

-o-- O--

--- O I

i

/

60%-

40% --

I!

I

-Y k-Forced Forced 20% "

l Outage i

Outage l'

0%

11/11 11/18 11/25 12/2 12/9 12/16 12/23 12/30 1/6 1/13 1/20 1/17 PERCENT OF. COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Week Endina

% of Comoleted Scheduled Activities 01/06/91 83 01/13/91 100 01/20/91 87 01/27/91 76 Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SE. 33 30

Completed Scheduled Activities (IC)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

l 1

[

/

\\

/ l!

B0% O----of--;--o- - - --o -- - ]-- - -e - -

--O - o

\\

!/

I i

60% -

i t

i 40% --

Forced Forced 20% -

Outage l

t t

l 1

0%

11/11 11/18 11/25 12/2 12/9 12/16 12/23 12/30 1/6 1/13 1/20 1/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This_ indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of echeduled maintenance activities concerning-Instrumentation & Control. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and mhicellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Vleek Endino 3 of Comoteted Scheduled Activities 01/06/91 59 01/13/91 76 01/20/01 93 01/27/91 97 Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 31

i i

1-

@ Number of Missed STs Resulting in LER's i'

O O

0 0

O

-Feb90 Mar

. Apr May..Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Occ.Jan91 l

t NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS'

~ RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS-This indicato.r shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee-Event Reports-(LER's) during the reporting month.

During 'the month of January 1991, there were no missed ST's that resulted in l

LER's.

Data Source:.

Plant License' Event Reports (LER)'-

i Adverse Trendi None SEP 60 & 61;

.. u

.y i

32

352

~

l ITotal NPRDS Component Failuros

30 -

M Confmed NPRDS Component Failures 25 -

f.:.b w

20 -

d nn 0:'

~

~"""

.&l,

{f'A;

?!b

%V M

w

$h R@$v

$[mn 15-y W

h?lY

$[

Mg 10-2

~

n

$N ki bhib w

ja!

N-b!$

hl hff 5-m El g$$ h h

..a$

~1 M

$a 3

h Il l h$

hi rT"l CI I

C 0

Feb90 ; Mar

. Apr -

May Jun

- Jul

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec - Jan91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES EThis indicator shows the total' number of NPRDS component failures and the num-ber of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total _ number of NPRDS compo.

nent failures is based upon:the. number of failure reports sent to'INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS. component failures is-based upon the number of failure're-ports that have been accepted by INPO, The difference of these two figures is the -

number of failure reports still under review by INPOi During January 1991i there was a. total of one confirmed NPRDS component failure.

Data Socr.:e:-

JJaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

' Adverse Trend: None 33

i Components With More Than One Failure

--X-Components With More Than Two Failures 10-5-

x______x_.

._x, s,x a

N s s, x.._ _ - x_... _ _ x.... x. _ _ _..g

/

s J

%. ' s,,"/

0 Feb90 Mar -

Apr -- May Jun

- Jul Aug.

Sep

. Oct Nov Doc Jan91 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS '

The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed tollowing guidelines _ set -

forthlby the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation

.of Operational Data-(NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and Lverifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability.

. Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This-indicator shows-the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number.of NPRDS components with more

-than two failures during.the last twelve months.'The number of NPRDS compo-c nents with more than two failures in a twelve-month period should' indicate the effectivenes.s of plant maintenance.

During January 1991, there'were 3 NPRDS components with more th'an one failure

'and.2 NPRDS components with more than two failures, The tag numbers of the 2' NPRDS components with more than two failures in the last twelve months include:

CH-1B and CH 1C,-

' Data Source:

-Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

-34 t

i-20" Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours

-o-Industry Check Valve Failure Rate 15-10-5:

j

.6 -

S.

&--6 - o ---o' o

0 Feb90 Mar

' Apr May

. Jun-Jul

-Aug Sep Oct.

Nov Dec Jan91 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE.

= Thl ind!cator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and the industry check valve failure rate. --

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the Per-formance Indicators Report reportlng month due to the' time involved in collecting and processing the data.-The industry failure rate is. based upon failures that have'

. occurred in the previous 18 month interval.-

For October 1990,'the Fort Calhoun Station reported a chack valve failure rate of =

3l25E-6 while the industry reported a failure rate of 2.44E-6. At the end of Janu-

~

ary;.the Fort Calhoun Station reported a check valve failure rate of 1.95E-6. As'of; the end of October; the check valve failure rate _for Fort Calhoun is higher than the~

.~lndustry check valve failura rate. The reason for the high check valve failure rate is -

that the plant is performing maintenance on check valves which have not been itested for fa'ilures before. As' time goes on, the check valve failure rate is. expected to decrease due to:the' fact that the check valves are now being maintained.

I through.the Check Valve Program.

. Data Source:

Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

. Adverse Trend: None-SEP 43 i

I

-35

- Secondary System CPI

+- Sec ndary System CPI Umit 1.5,

"6-Industry Upper Quartile -

4 1

+...q.....+....r...+....+.. +...

.s...

s....+....+...

4 E

j d

I

.h eM 6----6 6--6 6--o---6 ---6--2r -O rm s

0

'88

89 Jan90 Feb' Mar Apr May.Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 y

~

757.7

- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Gudelines

-175:

4 150; 0000 E !

125;

+

359 r

100;

(

75 -

50 {

- 25 ;

-0

.'88

.89 Jan90- Feb: Mar - Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep. Oct

.Nov Dec00 q

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY

-The top graph,' Secondary System Chemistry Performanco Index-(CPI),'is caicu-o

. lated using three parameters.<The three parameters used include; cation conductiv-llty'in steam generator blowdown, sodlum in steam. generator blowdown, and-

.condsasate_ pump discharge dissolved oxygan.The CPI was reported as 0.34 for =

. the month of December.=The CPI values-for June, Julyi and August are high due?

.to startup =after the 1990 Refueling Outage, various'. fluctuations in power, wb.ich

have occurredi-and's forced outage in August. The industry upper quartile value.

for this'ind_icator was 0416 for-August 1989 through December 1989. The cpl.

Lindustry value then changea to 0.24 for 1990..

aThe bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelinusi tracks the total" hours'of 13 parameters exceeding guidelines during' power operation. The number

. of hours outside ' owners group'guidolines was reported as 0.0. hours for the month ~-

of December.

The above.two chem'stry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due-to the time needed for data collection and evaluation.of the station chemistry' data.

. Data Source:-

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)?

LAdverse Trends: None 36-

?

,.. x..

10% -

- Primary System Chemistry Out of Umit j

8%-

GOOD h

0% -

A%-

1.0 2% -

as Nhif ii$N 0

'88

'89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr - May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCFNT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT

- The' Primary System Chemistry a Percent of Hours 'Out of Limit indicator tracks the

- primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parame-ters.'

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as l'.9% for the month of December.

[

The high percent of hours out of limit for the primary system during June and July was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctua-tlons,which occurred during June and July. The high percent of hours out of limit _

for the_ month of September was due a shutdown and a startup which occurred, increases in November and December were due to plant outages during those months.100%_ equates to all six parameters being out of lim _it for the month.

' Data Source:

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend:' None

i 10-

- Hours Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Umit

-/r Industry Upper Quartilo 8-i

~

GOOD 6-

)

4-mPs*

2-(

1 i

\\

0 0

l 0

m o

m m

u

'88

'89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 90 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxl!!ary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The ebove chemistry hidicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as zero for the month of December.

The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of all nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source:

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 1

i 38

1 2D 3 Number of instruments Out of Servico G-Fort Calhoun Goal

~ 13.

16.-

16 16-gg;g 7 y

. h

.hi wk n

g%m o

u m,,

$g$h; Lin u M

gWr i;

g pp Ni 12-12 h?Nhg$p$

314 12 - #M nm k!@!!:

Slh!$

N#$ "N $$

51$

Md $ff.?@$vil

%w)uW MS N

aA 2

a W

it mk 8- %ggM ggf M#

"9 %

q%p i

e< F 7

7 7

rday1 4%e Nd

%f e

. W4 MW YM g

CWs 4

,,. :Oi 6

li b

$pkAgpbfMW3PM-%t gMp-s h;

- EM -96 TQr- @e-thj 5

2%q#

$' 9 Igam A

W 49 4

- E {

d *b hk@%)

pd f et spa n%TsIb ggm h

g,lg$i b$d ly5 t i shW 4-s i 1 W. R Q "1 .i. d a& eE Sam pW Mi W,! f 4 2 A mw, _o u,, $: hi &y& g I: 7 e, y a mm Y g)q ;i gc[n% Wl,ty Qfi ?bh AgR #$ l$& ^ tg h. t yi M h W si W, M trn.J y y lJ;p l 0 Feb90 Mar ' Apr-May. Juni - Jul Aug Sep'. Oct -Nov Dec: Jan91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry systra instruments that are out-of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems in-volved in this indicator include the Secondary Systern 'and the Post Accident Sama pling System (PASS), At the end of January there were a total of 5 ln' line chemistry Instruments that ~ were out of-service. Three of these instruments were from the Secondary System - and 2 were from PASS, lThe Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of-service has been set at 6. Six out of-service chemistry instruments 'make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments which are counted for this~ind;ca-tor.. Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source) i Adverse Trend:: None 5 39 1

ETotalWaste Produced (Kilograms) - Federal ano State Limit (KO) 1000-800-600 - I u 398.8 r 400 - 7 222.2 200 -

164.5 14.5-4 wp e

= Q: m 6]jj & gy,3 _ p . 89.8 7o 1 g... - g fg g,4.- g ( 0 Feb90 Mar _; Apr - May Jun Jul Aug. Sep. Oct _Novi Dec. Jan91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun'each month. This hazardous waste consists of non-halogenated hazard-ous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced. During'the month of January,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste Dwas produced,'24.9 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was_ produced,: and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced. - Data-Source:- Smith /Henning (Manager / Source)- ? Adverse Trend: None 4 40-i i 4 ,m

l - l Highest Ex sure for the Month (mrem) E Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem) Highest Exposure for theYear (mrem) L OPPD 4500 rnRerWyr, Umit 4000 - 3000 - 2000 - 1000-1 610 610- -610 0-January 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE o During January 1991, an individual accumulated 610 mrem which was the high-est Individual exposure for the month, l The maximum individual exposure to date for the first' quarter of 1991 has been - i '610 mrem,n The rnaximum individual exposure reported to_date _for 1991 has been 610 mrem. -The OPPD~ limit-for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 . mrem / year, c Data Source:- Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)' = l Adverse Trend: None . i 41

00 - Monthly Personnel Contaminations CumulatNe Personnel Contaminations - - 350 - -o-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal. 300- --o-Industry Upper Quartile 250 - 200 - 150 - &... o.... o....o...o.....e_.. o..... o.... e... #... o..... o e--o---G--G ---G--- o ---D - . O - O -- D ---- o -100 - 50 - =9 0 _Jan91' Fab Mar

Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS There was a. total of 9 skin and clothing. contaminations reported for the Fort

.Calhoun Station during January 1991 There_has been a total of 9 skin and cloth-ing contaminations so far in 1991.

There_was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations'in 1990.

The 1991 goal for skin.and clothing is 144 contaminations, j The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per; unit annually, s Data Source Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) .I Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 42

m _- _ _. _ _ + Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Fort Calhoun Goal 100% - l 90% - o _.-...n m g n,. .v 80% - . G., ...O',., j ' o_ - 70%- - 60% - L L 50% - l L - 40% - 30% - -20% Feb90 Mar - Apr May - Jun Jul. -Aug-Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 DECONTAMINATED AUXlLIARY BUILDING L ~ This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated

(clean)_ based on the total square footage and a Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decon-tamineted' auxiliary building (non outage months) and a goal of 75% decontaml-J insted auxiliary building (outage months).

. As of January 31,1991,85.9% of the total square footage of the auxiliary build- .ing was decontaminated. An increase in the percentage of the auxiliary. building l.-

which is. decontaminated is expected after the auxiliary building painting _is com.

L pleted. ! Data Source: Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source) L Adverse Trendi None SEP 54 i u 3 4

.. -.. ~ f 14-P Number of identified PRWP's. 9 12 - t 10-8- '7 iN > 6- !P if i$ji if '- v ,f kb;j a f Q-2- (' } IX 1 1 1 1: 1

fh 2f (" '.

]'I 3 3'- .O Feb90 - Mar

Apr, May _-Jun -

Jul Aug Sep ' Oct - Nov-Dec Jan91 t . It i RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM -

The Radiological-Wor _k Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor _

-Radiological _ Work Practices (PRWP's) which were identified during the_ reporting month. '- The number of PRWP's which are Identified each month _should indirectly provide a means'to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability.for their workers' radlologi-L icalf performance.; .'During the month of January;1991,'one PRWP was identifiedt 4 Data Source:- lPatterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: LNone-SEP 52 4 -- n

75-

Total Number of Hot Spots Number of Additional Hot Spots identified 53 II 50- jj 16s W!

W4 $p 25 - ly . 10 .N k 0-Jan91-. Feb-Mar - Apr May _Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91

NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS 1This-Indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a

~ hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of thigh rad!ation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or-piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than~100 mrem / hour. At the end of January,53. hot spots were identified and documented to exist in

the Fort Calhoun Station. During the month of January; ten additional hot spots T were identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station. Six of the identified hotspots

~ (5 !acations) are shielded. Two of these locations were sche" iled for flushing,'but the CEDM hous;ng leak outage interfered with the schedule, me drains in the auxiliary building are sheduled to be hydrolazed which shoulu reduce the total number of hotspots.- Data Source:- Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) ' Adverse Trend: None-45

E Monthly Radioact!ve Gas Discharged (Curies) Cumulative Radioactive Gas Ditcharged (Curles) -O-- Cumulative Goal (Curies) 800 - 600 - 400 - o _ _ _ _ e. _ _. _ o _. _ _ _ o _....e _ _ _ _.e_ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ o _. _ _ _ e.....e. _ _ -. e.. _ _ _ o 200-i 0-Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct thv Dec00 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The gasaous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1990 through June 1990. A total of 261 curies have been released to the environrrient fcom Jtary through June of 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal is 360 curies for this indicaior. The high value of gaseous radioactive waste that was released to the environment during the month of February 1990 was due to containment purge associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Data Source: Franco /Stultz (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None 46

d Monthly Radioactive Uquid Discharged Cumulative Ra:foa:: live Uquid Discharged Cumulative Goa! 228 231 228 300 - lll-0 O-- O - - - - O~ ~ - - -O- -- - A3 - ~ ~ - O - - - -O- - ~ ~ -O - - - - O - - - ~ & - - - -O -- - - O 200 - i[ GOOD 100 - Y '87 '88 '89 - Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Jul Aq Sep Oct Nov Dec90 20000 - ? g O' 10000.- >- o ? R W h $ ? 185 206 497 0 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioa.,tive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for the months of Janusry 1990 through June 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that i was discharged to_the environment from all sources totaled 55 curles from Janu-1 ary through June 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1990 is 256 curies. -l The bottom graph shows the volume of liquld radioactive waste that has been i released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioac-tive' wasty monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 11.6 million gallons from Januaiy through June 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment includes liquid released from tho steam generators due to the ' fact that radioisotopes '4# detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. - Data Source: Franco /Stultz (Manager / Source) -r Adverse Trond: None 47

l - Loggablo/Roportable incidents (Does not includo Systern Failuros) 25 - 20-GOOD 15 - 4 10-6- O Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 120 - Security Systorn Failures - GOOD 80-E 40-0 4 Feb90 Mar Apr. May Jun. Jul Aug Sep_ Oct Nov TW Jan91 LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first chart depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles _(LDV's); Security Badges; Security Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph'shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning security system failures which occurred during the r600rting month. During the month of January-1991,there were 88 loggable/reportai:!e incidentsc u identified. Security sys' tem failures accounted for 82 of the loggable/ reportable-incidents (93%).) Thirty five of the loggable security system failures were environ-mental failures due to-inclement weather conditions during the reporting period. The 2 loggable incidents depicted in Access Control and Authorization involved the p -incorrect issuing of a security badge and improper escort procedures, There were ..c 4 lost /.J.vtended security badges during this reporting period.-During January. L 391, Security Services placed special emphasis on the proper use and handling of r ty badges,1.e., issued new badge holders, encouraged plant' employees to the holders by placing a message on the Security Work Area traveling sign, . _ published an article in the Nuclear Notes. .ia Source:. . Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None - Reason given above. SEP 58 48 l-

~ 25 -- 1 le l Securhy Report / Log incidents November 1990 I Security Report / Log incidents Decorrber 1990 M Securhy Report / Log incidents January 1991 GOOD 15 -

p:

~ 10-S. S-4 - 4 .g ,m 2-Y w, ; g J 10: 0 0 0 0' O O O Ewa O LDVs ~ Badges Key Control. ' Access Control t -f SECURITY INCIDENT = BREAKDOWN The Security incident Breakdown Indicator has'been changed. This indicator now - shows th*e' number of incidents concerning the_ followingl items for_the reporting- =i Jmonth inLeolbmn form 1These items include: Licensee.D_esignated Vehicles '.(LDV's); Security Badges;: Access Control and Authorization; and Security Key . Coritrol. Security _ ltems.- -. Number of incidents - ' Jan 91-Dec 90-Licensee Designated Vehldes (LDV's).- O 'O' M LSedurity Baoses: J4 ~. Security Key Control 0 0 Access Control and-Autorization 2 0-Total ) 4 i n 1,. ~ Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source) l Data' Source:- - Adverse Trend: None-SEP 58' -49 a._ w rtw e ,,,w --r ,,+

35-l l Environmental Failures 3 System Failures 30 25 -

GOOD h 21 20- $W NI$ lY 3/t 15-14 4 f Rh!M {f (N 3lh 10-

'W M{

y; % m T 7 un M $ IMS 0 9 3 5 g y' [yh Mi 5- .}M -7 3mi;g;.y gg d $ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Name CCTV Computer Search Equip. Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES LThe Security System Failures Indicator has been changed. This Indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month -These items include: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Com- . puter Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card : Reader Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will now be di.;ded into two categories: environmental failures and failures as indicated in the Definition Sec-tion'. i Number of incidents: Jan 91 Dec 90 S s em Fallures Env. Fail. Equip.- Fail. Env. Fail. Equip. Fall. Jl Alarm Systems. 5 21 13 33 CCTV 30 5 32 6 Computer-- n/a .O n/a 5 . Search Equipment n/a 7 n/a n/a Door Hardware - n/a 14 n/a 6 - Card Reader' n/a O n/a 2 . Total 35' 47 45 52-Data Source:' Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 50 E:- .....-- i 4

10%- =-- -:- /smount of Work On Hold Awalting Parts 8%- sy. N.-

* ~

sy-~ 2% - 0%- Feb90 Mar Apt May Jun Jul Aug St,p Oct Nov Dee Jan91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON hot.D AWAITING PARTS (NON OUTAGE) This procurement Indicator displays the amount of open, nvn outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non outage, maintenance items, expressed as a percentage. The percentage of work on hold awalting parts was reported as 3.9% in January, As of January 31,1991, there were a total of 710 open, non outage, maintenance items with 28 of these items on hold awaiting parts. Data Source: Patterson/ CHAMPS (Man 3qer,' Source) Adverse Trond: None 1 51

_. ~.. _. r -- Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Millkn) 12 l / 59 -

~

r W i $6 - 1 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct - Nov Dec Jan91 i l SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value et the Fort Calhoun Station at tive end of January 1991 was reported as $11,325,827. { Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None i 660 - ? -c= Spare Parts lanued ($ Thousands) - 600 - 32- ~ ~ g $50 t Febe0 Mar Apr May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Janet. p SPARE PARTS ISSUED i The value of the spare parts issued during December 1990, totaled $207,530. - i The valua of the spare parts issued durino January 1991, totaled 680,484.. ) Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend:: None s 52 .. -.. -. - -. -. :--..-,..._.._..-..___.-.....~..-..--..-..._...~.,-.-.... -.~... - -

-- Inventory Accuracy 100%- ~ ~-- g g 95% - 90%- 85% - 80% Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jari91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month. During January,1,286 dilforent lino items woro counted in the warehouse. Of the 1,286 line items counted 6 Items nooded count adjustments. The inventory accu-racy for the month of January was reported as 99.5% Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trondt Nono w~ Pichickets With Part Not Available 4% 3%- 2%- \\, 0% "4 4 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug S(f Oct Nov Doc Jan91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting rnonth. During the month of January, a total of 912 Pick Tickets woro generated. Of the 912 P!ck Tickets generated, zero Pick Tickets were generated with no parts avall-able. Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverso Trond: Nono 53 j

i -G-Total Receipts

Spare Parts Receipts

- Standard Stores Receipts 1200- -+ Direct Charge Receipts s 900-t R 600- \\ h O x 300-K .. O,, x p',. -+-L A. ',,,,5....; b - & % w g ::::: 6 's 44 42, ,,,.o - 0-Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct. Nov Dec amiG1 WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS -This indicator shows the total number of warehouse receipts, the number of spare parts receipts, the number of standard stores receipts, and the number of direct charge receipts during the reporting month. During. January the'warehout,a received a total of 524 receipts. Of the 524 re-ceipts received,129 were spare parts receipts,112 were standard stores receipts, and 283 were direct charge receiptt Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None-54-I

4000 - -G-TotalIssues + Spare Parts issues Standard Stores issues Direct Charge issues 3000 - 2000 - Y 'o- -o g_4 1000 - 23 M ,, b ~~.. ..o ....c. 4,Kb ~~.. . D ' ~ - <.r ' - 9.. O - --- o %pycf.... f.... - 6===1r~- -.g.::.=A- --- - 4 0 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 WAREHOUSE ISSUES This indicator shows the total number of warehouse issues, the number of spare parts iss,ues, the number of standard stores issues, and the number direct charge issues for the reporting month. During January the warehouse completed a total of 986 issues. Of the 986 issues completed,238 were spare parts issues,541 were standard stores issues, and 207 were direct charge issues. Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None l l 55 l

80% - -G-TotalReturns (

Snare Parts Returns l

-O-Standard Stores Returns + i -++- Direct Charge Returns 60% - b 40%- ,, A t g v-s ,r' \\ / \\ 4, .j '\\ / \\ / \\a' \\, 20% - j j g' h,' 3.. -e,, 3 / 'o N %g 4k.,,, 3...o..o. "' ~ o.._ _g O ~~O M N 0% ~W =- Feb90 - Mar - Apr May Jun Jul Aug - Sep Oct Nov-Dec 'Jan91 WAREHOUSE RETURNS The Warehouse Returns Indicator shows the percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total 1 number of-warehouse issues during the reporting month. During the month of January there were a total of 986 warehouse issues. Of the 986 issues, there were 127 total returns. These returns consisted of 72 spare parts returns and 55 standard stores returns. Data Source:' Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) h Adverse Trend: None .56 ,,.-_..u, a..

_ _ ~. - - 4 no. R November $0 Matt Roquests 16-C December '90 Matt Roquests "T 12 - 8- _7 0 Muun I II 0 0 0 0 5 days 610 days 11 15 days 16 20 days 2130 days >30 days MATERIAL REQUESTS AWAITING APPROVAL This indicator shows the number of fnatorial requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month broken down into their age by days. At the end of January,14 material requests were awaiting approval. Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trond: None 2%- % of Total P. oases that are Expedited 1,5% - 1%- .5% - 0% Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated duMg the reporting month. During January, there was a total of 344 purchase oiduc generated. Of the 344 purchase orderu generated, there was one expedited purchase, Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None 57

100-f, ] November *00 On Hold invoices I I December '90 On Hold invoice 6 gg, E January'0t on Hok!inw. css 60-51 52 43 40- .4 1 34 30 n !': 3 4 O m m 0 Shelf ufe COE Miscouaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of invoices that are on hold at the end of the reporting month due to shelf life, COE, and miscellaneous reasons. At the end of January, zero invoices were on hold due to shelf life reasons,34 invoices were on hold due to COE reasons, and 52 invoices were or, hold due to miscellaneous reasons. Data Source: Wil! rett /Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trond: None 100% - - Percontage of Mato tal Requests for itosues with the Roquest Data the same as the Nood Date 80% - ^ 60% - 40% - ) 20% Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month. During the month of January, a total of 912 MR's were received by the ware-house. Of the 912 total MR's received by the warehouse,599 MR's were for issues with their request date the same as their need date. Data Source: Wilfrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Adverse Trond: None 58

- Total M:dtfcation P Lapes Open fh0 - 425 G 400 - 337 1300-200 '88 '89 'g0 Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Year End Numbers OUTSTANDING MODIFICMIONS This indicator has been changed. The total number of outstanding modifications no longer includes the number of outstanding modifications which are proposed to be cancelled. The total number of outstanding modifications decreased by 25 during the month of January. Categorv,,,,,, Jan 9,1, Form FC-1133 eacklog/in Progress 10 Mod Roquests Being Reviewed 101 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 101 Construction Backlog /in Progress 29 Dsfgn.,Enor. Updait.,Ra.sk!gghn Proaress 6L Total 312 As of the end of January,7 additional modification requests have boon issued this year and 8 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Re-view Committee _(NPRC) has completed 22 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 10 backlog modifi-cation request reviews this year. The number of reviews completed is high due to the fact that some of these requests were reviewed more than once. Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None 59 l

..._._..._.__..m_..____-__.-___________ l i 100 - - TotalTemporary Moitications 4-Fort Calhoun Goal 30 l l' 40 2 o-----o., j ' g.... o..... o....o......o..... p..... v.....p......o..... o ~ 0 ] Feb90- Mar Apr. Voy-.Jun hl Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec Jan91 4 C November 1990 l j. ^ 10-R Dxember1990 I g. January 1991 6 m 4 o._ O.3 Months - - 3 6 Months C.9 Months 912 Months > 12 Montha -TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS . EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) [ ( The top graph'shows the total number of temporary modifications installed in the Fort Calhoun Station and a Fort Calhoun goal.- At the end of January, there was a total of 24 tempo _rary modifications installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. The Fort Calhoun goal for the total number of installed t.emporary modifications Is less than 15 Installed temporary modifications. The bottom graph,- Age of Temporary Modifications, displays the age of all tempo. rary modifications by months installed in the plant. The number of temporary modifications has been increasing. Part of the reason for L- - this increase in the number of temporary modifications is the high number of tem-porary modifications requiring an outage to remove. Currently,9 temporary modifi-cations require an outage for removal. a o Data Source:. Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) Adverse Trond: None Reason for trend is given above.- SEP 62 & 71 p i L 60- .. _ _ _. _.. _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _..,. _.. ~. _. _ _ _ _. ~. -.. _.. ~

200-Total Number of Open EAR's 150-ja m 100-50-0 Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun [ l I November 1990 80-C Docomber 1990 60[ c January 1991 I 40-m 0- -~' 0 3 months 3 6 months >6 months OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EAn's) The top graph shows the total number of open EAR's at the end of the reporting month. At the end of January, there was a total of 147 open EAR's. The bottom graph shows the total number of open EAR's broken down by their age in months. The number of open EAR's has increased from 59 in May 1990 to 147 in January 1991. The major reason for the increase in the number of open EAR's is the result of discrepancies between old procedures and the new procedures which are being upgraded by the Procedures Upgrade Project. Data Source: Jaworski/ Van Osdel (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 61

~.. _. __ 150' -e-Total ECN's Open -X-ECN's Opened During the Month -*- ECN's Completed During the Month [.O 120- 'O' l \\ / \\ / \\ GO-sj \\ l '~s. \\ Y ' N \\c. / ;f \\ l,'~, g \\x \\,<', 's N .... -x, / 'X, ,X 30-X \\'*s-c,' s%,./ ~.. _ 'N ,/ s j \\ / N,' ' y/. s, N x' y ' 0-Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun - Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS The indicator shows the total number of open Engineering Change Notices (ECN's), the number of FCN's opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's completed during the reporting month. At the end of January 1991, there was a total of 153 open ECN's. During the month of-January,38 ECN's were opened, and 24 ECN's were completed. Data Source: Phelps/Bera (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None-SEP 62 - 62

--s. Document Changes 1

l Substituto Replacement item E Facility Changes 300 - ~* 225

y 200 -

159 100 - g. 56 55 E g,. 42 ._._j hi 21 M, 33 g sh lF :M4 _ -4 2 Total Open ECN's Opened ECN's Completed ECN's Total ECN's Reev ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the total number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received by De-sign Engineering during the reporting month into several categories. These catego-ries include: ECN's requiring a document change to complete, ECN's requiring substitute replacement items to complete, and ECN's requiring facility changes to complete. Total Open Opened Completed Recolved Document Changes 56 21 11 301 Substitute Replacement 42 4 2 225 Facility Changes 55 13 11 159 Data Source: Phelps/Bera (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 63

4-9 1991 Recordable injury Frequency Rate -+- 1990 Recordable injury Frequency Rate f 3.5 . +- 5 Year Average Recordable injury Frequency Rate 3-i 2.5 - A s ,s N 2-N, ,/ s, x 's, j '+ y % py./j/ 1.5 - '\\ / '4.... * *... N V ....+.....+ r 1 .5 - k O Jan Feb Mar - Apr May Jun Jul Aug-Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly recordeele injury cases frequency rate in column form. The above graph also includes the 1990 recordable injury cases frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average recordable injury cases frequency rate. 1 A recordable injury case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are - injured on the Job and require corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to date basis. There were zero recordable-injury cases reported during the month of January. There has been a total of zero recordable injury cases so far in 1991. There were 13 recordable cases reported in 1990, eleven reported in 1989, and eleven reported in 1988. The year end recordable injury frequency rates for 1988, 1989, and 1990 were 2.6,-2,2, and 2.1 respectively. Data Source: _ Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)- Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 26 64

C Lkensee Event Reports g l l Personnel Errors Reported in LERs - Cumulatrve U;onsee Event Reports H --- CumulatW Personnet Errors Ropo@d in LERs s i g Q 30- .3 y,26 y;. 20 - a Ik 's i_ s M 9 10 - O v ob '88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0::t Nov Doc NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Indicator reports the Licensee Event Reports (LER's) by their event date, in January 1991, there were two LER's reported. One of these LER's was attribut-able to personnel error. There have been 2 LER's reported so far in 1991and 1 LER has been attributable to personnel error. Data Source: Chase /Simmons (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 65

600 - 642 658 ~ ' " I l Actual Dnision Staffing l 400 - f~l Authorized DNision Stafbrg [& B 195 204 poo, _o $2 $4 I i 0 Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the throo Nuclear Divi-d slons. Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source) Adverse Trond: None SEP 24 4 10 - -G-Nuclear Operations DMslon Turnover Rate 0, t Production Engincoring DMslon Turnover Rato Nuclear Services DMslon Turnover Rate 6- -e -G A d , ' pat. a '6----A a 4-u t U=A=b28'-O

o. --o -o-o_.o_...-c 2- 07 o-o-o-o o

e-9/89 10/0 11/0 12/6 1/90 2/90 3/90 450 SSO 6/90 7/90 8/90 9/90 10/9 11/9 12/9 151 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resi nations 0 from OPPD. DMslon Turnover Rate NOD 4.4 % PED 6.2 % NSD 1.9 % Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0% This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years. Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source) Advv no Trend: None 66

4 l g, M SRO Eum Fess Ratio (if Exams Adtninistered) R RO Exam Pass Rstlo (if Exams Admin!stered) I sos - i b0% ' I 70% - 60%- i !>0% NRC Generic Fund NRC Site Specfic NRC Requal OPPD Requal SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO SRO License Examination Pass Ratio-The Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the

number of NRC adminhtered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered -

[ license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license re. qualification exams. RO License Examination Pass Ratio i .The Reactor Operator (RO) License Examination Pass Ratio indicator s_ hows the ~ i number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site. Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered licenso requalification exams, and the number of _OPPD administered license requalification 1

exams, a

Data Source: Gasper / Lazar (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None - SEP 68 67

40-R SRO Exams Administered ) SRO Exams Passed 35 C RO Exams Administered ? l 30-E RO Exams Passed / i i i 25-l l e h i i gg. l. l ..l ~ ~~ 15-9 t, - l t .) i 10- ? l 3 l ?.! i .5-0 1 m 7 l q . F 3 IT i 'i J i er i l 0 1~ ' Feb90 Mar Apr -May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS .i This indicator shows the number of SRO and RO quizzes and exams taken and passed each month, These Internally administered quizzes and exams are _used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of January 1991, no SRO exams were administered.

During the month of January 1991, no RO exams were administered. Data Source:; Gasper / Lazar (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 1 i H 08-u -..u..u ~.. . m

$5 - l l HothnosInitiated C Ho*Jines Closed 30 ' E Hothnes Open Under 4 Weeks Il Hothnos Open Over 4 Wooks p$. 20 - ~ 10-4 1 g t 3 y p ,7 p } q 7 j p j-9 g F 1 5-q 77 _, l =

[
i r-l r

o i . I '[{ Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 HOTLINES This indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines closed during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines that remain open and are less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old. During the rnonth of January 1991, there were 9 Hotlines initiated,4 Hotlines clos 6d,10 Hotline that remained open and was less than four weeks old, and 6 Hotilne that remained open and was older than four weeks old. Data Source: Gaspor/Newhouse (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None 69

4 [ Planned Clar,stoorn Hours (Thoutand Hours) C Actual Classroom Hour 6 (Thousand Hours) 3- -ti .N ~ ~ ~ ' l0i ~ l ~ 2- '- y -v s !4 j kl{ q .a j l< a g y i o e i m .] .th f( ,.r h! i M- 'r p q Y "i ti M pi 'g j q., j, y y j. r _~ gj 7( .R + o [ s h Y 7 di i e s 1 c n ~t g, a a 1 p i ji! ? ho R N e s / e b ? i i 9. '/ L i.! t;- y' '; o 40 g[ cq. m 3 3e 4 4, + c. g g n. a Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jat Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 90 CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time to collect and process the needed information. Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None N 1 70

35-E Other (1000 Hrs.) C General Employee Training (10%) Hrs.) 30-C Technical Suppo t (1000 Hrs.) E Chemistry and RaSabon Prote: tion (1000 Hrs.) 25-E Maintenance (10D0 Hrs.) Operations (1003 Hrs) 20-Ij 15-kJ2 ] n 1. ,.,a w s ,. : N j . !;[ 10-M n s 3.., flgijn h s im y%g g.. &!i og w un. 3 yW g, JanD3 Feb Mar Apr May Jua Jul Aug bop Oct Nov D0:00 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Mainte. nonce, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Train!ng, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data. Total Hours TRAINING DEC 1990 JAN 1991 ~,124 1,880 Operations 2 Maintenance 3,770 4,024 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1,777 1,504 Technical Support 1,005 1,202 General Employee Training 3,509 3,146 Other 216 941 Total 13.061 12.697 Data Source: Gaspor/Newhouse (Manager / Source) Adverse Trond: None 71

- Total Outage MWO's MWO's Ready to Work 0- Outa00 MWR Backlog 600 400- - - - - - ~- -~ - d----------- 200 - - - - - - - - - - 6 a -- / O ~~-- - O O Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 ViWO OVERALL STATUS (1991 REFUELING OUTAGE) This indicator shows the total number of MWO's that have been written over the past reporting periods for completion during the 1991 Refueling Outage and the number of MWO's that are ready for work (the parts for these MWO's are staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is ready for field use). Any MWO'k written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator la-beled Emergent MWO's. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling outages. A decrease in the number of MWO's ready to work is a result of an ongoing re-view of outage MWO's. A number of MWO's were removed from the outage scope. Additional data points will be added to this indicator as Information becomes avall-able. Data Source: Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 72

- Total Outage Modifications Mods With Planning Document Approved -G-Mods With Final Design Approved -+- Mods With Construction Package Approved 30 20- - ---~~--------------------~~---------~~------------------------~~---------------- 10-------------~~------------ ---~~~----------------------------~~------------------- I ~ 4 o e s# 0 Aug90 Sep~ Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PROGRESS OF 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING -This indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to deter - mine feasibility) for completion during the 1991 Refueling Outage. Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becoroes available. The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the 1991 Refu-eling Outage is as follows. Outage Scope Freeze Oct 1,1990 Planning Documents Approved - Feb 22,1991 Final Designs Approved Apr 24,1991 Construction Packages Approved Jun 15,1991 Schedule incorporated Jul 26,1991 Material On Site Jul 26; 1991 Construction Started. Oct 21,1991 Construction Complete - Nov 4,1991 Accepted By SAC Nov 15,1991 Data Source: Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 4 73

v! - Total Outage Projects -e-Projects with Pre!!minary Schedules Submhted + Projects with Detailed Schedules Submitted 50 40 30 N -20 10 g 0 Aug90 Sep-Oct - Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (1991 REFUELING OUTAGE) This indicator shows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the 1991 Refueling Outage, .The reduction in the number of total outage projects is due to reclassification of former pro}ects to ECN's or Maintenance items. Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes avall-able. The schedule for the 1991 Refueling Outage projects is as follows. All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detall Jun 28,1991 Procedures Ready Aug 2i1991 Parts Staged Aug 16,1991 Data Source: Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source) - Adverse Trend:- None-SEP 31 74.

12 - Violatbns per 1030 Inspection H0Jr$ 10.6 -o-- FortCahounGoal 9-

o.....o.... o.... o....o_....o.... o. -. o -. o_.. -o- - o... o GOOD 6-4 3.7 3-ww

'87 '88 '89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 ^ VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC Inspection hours, This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collectin0 and processing the data, The violations por 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 2.3 for the month of December 1990. There was a total of 7,672 inspection hours in 1990 which resulted in 20 viola- . tions.. I The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.2, Data Source: Chase /Howman (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None 76

75 - [ l Number of Vio!atiors During the Last 12 Months C Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months N' _47 41 41 ~ ~ 3B b.7 / 3.$ ~ y 3 { 28 77 s 4 19 E b E 9 Y U 3 .D;; ,12 0 12,

11 i

^ g i 4 g._ 'h j-M T h 7 E m s.- 1, c. a .i ~ g q ti Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep CM Nov Dec00 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) This indicator has been changed. The number of violations and NCV's which have been identified during the last twelve months will now be reported one month behind the reporting month. The Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCV's) Indicator shows the cumulative number of violations for the last twelve months and the cumulative number of NCV's for the last twelve months. This indicator is one month behind the reporting due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator. During the last twelve months,20 violations have been identified and 12 NCV's have been identified. Data Source: Chase /Howman (Mana0er/ Source) Adverse Trond: None 76

-~ Tobl Outstaeng CAR's ) C OutstandingCAns > Six Months Ok! C Outstanding CAWS That Are Modifcation Related 200 1 f N 100-( ~ 50 - ] ~ - - ~ ~ ^ ~ i 1 _ um >4, C% u ; u.0, , i= 4 -ny Feb90. Mar - Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Od Nw Dec Janst .OUTST/iNDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows th9 total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of cutstanding CAR's that are greater than six rnonths old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that are roottification related, A.s of the end of January 12'fl, there were 134 outstanding CAR's,3B -OAR's that-are greater than six months olt and 6 CAR's that are modification related, iP Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / ource) R Adverse Trond:- None r s 77 h -ri s i- -i i i- .,________.______.____.._.m

0- NOD Overuse CAR s j K [ n-NOD CA'Vs V.'ith Extensions Granted \\ 3... 6.. ) 3.. . 6 - - \\ - 6 -- A.. <. - %s. -' " ' "6 " --A.. -s \\ 0

,,"--O,,.

M O --- W '* *=~"-43 0-+ b-Feb90 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sog. Oct Nov Dec Jan91 30 ] -U-PED Overdue CAR's 20-

PED CAR s With Extensions Granted

,A, , A -- -. g 10- ~. zu.4.. - b ' ~ - t ' ',.'.+----g' 0 - (r ' ~... n -, s -O ' aa g_ _._._ p c r u = r al = n L3 _. a G =, g, A p x Feb90 Mar /b May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 0 t -

g. Other Overdue CAR's 4-

Other CAR's With Extensions Granted 3-

.g. 1- ,,6 --- - 6.., 'O'p,.6. O'f g. A i 0 -6 ~- & --tra -e -O G 'O D F ~ 'O-~ j Feb1 Mar Apr 'isy Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov occ hrG1 OVE60VE AN 7 EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicmor shows the number of overduo CAR's and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by or0anizatior.. Overduc CAR's: Organiration Nov 90 Dec 90 Jan 91 NOD 0 0 0 PfD 1 0 4 El%.4 _. 0 1 0 'n ul i 1 4 CAR'a with extentiom Q J'ted: OrotW -~. ration f.w 90 Dec 90 Jan 91 ~ PED 14 12 pmm A,,,__ o_ 1 Total 11 18 15 Overee CAR's: Organbren Nov 90 Dec 90 Jan 91 Nob

O f

o PED 1 0 4 Others 0 1 0 Total 1 1 4 Data Source: Orr/Cortis 'Vanage r/Sourco) Adverso Yrend: Nono l 78 l

100 - -G-NOD CAR's >6 Months 04 75 - d-NOD CAP's <6 Months Old ,,...g......g- - --b* * * * *

4 ' '

.g... - - b - - - -- t I-..g

- b.... -b,. 6 SO '

25 - 3------e o o O O c - =c

3--

O -- C w Feb90- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 3oo.- -e-PED CAR's >6 Months Old 75- ,e-PED CAR's <6 Months Old

h-----E - - -b ---- O s t 0

Feb90 Mr.- Apr May Jun .Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 30-0 Other CAR's t 3 Months Old d-Other CAR's <6 Months Old , h ~ ,'O a ,,4 ' 0 ",,,,,..e - ' ---6' 10- ' N k"'Y ,,,,d' $,-g -d - O u% 3 0 Feb90 - Mar Aor May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS CURRENT STATUS ~ This indicator shows the number of CAR's that are older than 6 months and the number of CAR's that are less than 6 months old broken down by organization, CAR's Grcater than 6 Months Old: Organization Nov 90 Dec 90 Jan 91 NOD 10-10 6 ! PED '43-41 33 Others-2 4 1 Total US 55 40-CAR's Less than 6 Montns Old: Organization - Nov 90 Dec 90 - Jan 91 NOD-54-61-47 PED-39 38 36 Others 9 1 17 11 -Total-112 116 94 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None 79 l

1990 sal.P Funct. Area CAR's Signif. CAR C M ola. LER A) Plant Operations 62 0 2 1r B) Radiolog. Contiois 28 2 0 C) Maint/ Surveil. 180 8 0 4 )? D) Ernergency Preparedness 7 0 3 0-E) Security 26 0 6 3 F) Engr / Tech Support. 172 5 3 12 G) Safety Assess / Qual Verif. 29 0 0 0 H) Other 1 0 0 0 Total 505-15 20 29 1991 SALP Funct. Area CAR's Signif. CAR NRC Wola. LER's A) Plant Operations 6 0 O B) Radiolog. Controls 0 0 O C) Maint/Survell. 12 0 O g D) Emergency Preparedness 0 0 0 E) Securit/ 0 0 1 ' F) Engr / Tech Support 10 0 1 G) Safety Assess / Qual. Verif. 1 0 0-H) Other 0 0 0 Total 29 0 2 - CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIF. CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED - The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued .by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) versus the number of Significant CARS Tissued by NSD versus the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 and 1991. Included in this table is the number of Licen-see Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported are one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting andl processing the violations. In January _1991 there were 29 CARS lssued, zero Significant CARS issued, and 2. LERs identified. During December 1990 zero NRC violations were issued. Thus no - violations were attributable to personnel error. 80

Fort Colhoun Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK (12 MONTH HUNNING TOTAL) ORDERS The cumulative number of violations and Non-This indicator tracks the total number of Cited Violations for the last 12 months. outstanding corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT their age in months. The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts. AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE ILOST This indicator is defined as the percentage of TIME ACCIDENT RATE) open, non-outage, maintenance work orders This indicator is defined as the number of that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total accidents for all utility personnel permanently nurr,ber of open, non outage, maintenance work assigned to the.taihn, involving days away

orders, from work per 200,000 rian hours worked (100 man years). This d(es not include AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS contractor personnel. This hdicator tracks OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS personnel performance for Sa fety Enhancement The cumulative hours that the Component Program (SEPl item 26.

Cooling Water system is outside the station - chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) from the first sample exceeding the limit until The Document Review indicator shows the additional sampling shows the parameter to be number of documents reviewed during the back within limits. reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE month, and the number of document reviews The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and that are overdue. This indicator tracks the industry check valve failure rate (f ailures per performance for Safety Enhancement Program 1 million component hours). The data for the (SEP) Reference Number 46, industry failure rate is three months behind the Performance Indicators Report reporting month. EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT This indicator tracks performance for SEP item RELIABILITY 43. This indicator shows the nt.mber of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 CLASSHOOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort The number of planned classroom hours and the Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values number of actual classroom hours for the Fort which correlate to a htoh level of confidence Calhoun Station, that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT CURRENT the demand failures are less than the trigger STATUS values. The number of Corrective Action Reports

1) Number of Start Demands (CAR's) that are older than 6 months and the All valid and inadvertent start demands, number of CAR's that are less than 6 months including ali start only demands and all start old broken down by organization.'or'the last 6 demanos that are followed by load run

months, demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation. A start only demand is a demand in CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG which the emergency generator is started, but GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD no attempt is made to load the generator.

The percentage of total outstanding corrective

2) Number of Start Failures maintenance items, not requiring an outage, Any failure within the emergency generator that are greater than three months old at the system that prevents the generator from er") of the period reported, achieving specified frequency and voltage is CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON-CITED classified as a valid start failure. This includes VIOLATIONS any condition identified in the course of 81

Fort Calhouti Station Psrformance Indicatior Report Indicator Definitions maintenance inspections (with the emergency The breakdown of the total number of open generator in standby mode) that definitely ECN's, the number of ECN's that were opened would have resulted in a start failure if a during the reporting month, the number of demand had occurred. ECN's that were completed during the reporting

3) Number of Load Run Demands month, and the number of ECN's recolved For a valid load run demand to be counted the during the reporting month into three r:

load run attempt must meet one or more of the categories. These categories include; 1) ) following; document changes are required to complete the A)A load-run of any duration that results from a ECN's,2) substitute or replacement items are real automatic or manual initiation, required to complete the ECN's, or 3) f acility B)A load run test to satisfy the plant's load and changes are required to complete the ECN's, duration as stated in the test specifications. This indicator tracks performance for SEP item N' C)Other special tests in which the emergency generator is expected to be operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of its ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS deshn load, The number of ECN's that remain open at the

4) Number of Loa Stun Failures end of the reporting month. the number of A load run failure should be counted for any ECN's that were opened during the reporting reason in which the emergency generator does month, end the number of ECN's that are not pick up load arid run as predicted. Failures completed during tne reporting month. This are counted during any valid load run demands, indicator tracks performance for SEP item 62.

EQUIPMEN FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 Unsucc s ut attempts to start or load run . shouH not be counted as valid demands or failures when they can be attributed to any of Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical the following; hours is the inverse of the mean time between A) Spurious trips that would be bypassed in the forced outages caused by equipment failures. event of an emergency. T5e mean time is equal to the number of hours B) Malfunction of equipment that is not required the reactor is criticalin a period (1000 hours) during an emergency, divided by the number of forced outages caused Cilntentional termination of a test because of by equipment failures in that period, abnormal conditions that would not have EUMFM MUN MOR resulted in major diesel generator damage or This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum D) Malfunctions or operating errors which would generation, expressed as a percentage. have not prevented the emergency generator Available generation is the energy that cari be ~ from being restarted and brought to load with,n i produced if the unit is operated at the maximum EIA ai ure t start because a portion of the regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is starting system was disabled for test purpose, if - the energy that can be produced by a unit in a followed by a successful start with the starting given period if operated continuously at system in it; normal abgnment. maximum capacity. Each emergency generator failure that results,m-the generator being declared inoperable should EXPEDITED PURCHASES be counted as one demand and one failure. The percentage of expedited purchases which Exploratory tests during corrective maintenance occurred during the reporting month compared and the successful test that follows repair to to the total number of purchase orders verify operability should not be counted as generated, demands or failures when the EDG has not been FORCED OUTAGE RATE declared operable again. This indicator is defined as the percentage of a unh was mavaHaNa M m W ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) E' BREAKDOWN elet.trical generation. Forced events are failures 82

Fort Calhoun Performance Indicator Report i indicator Definitions or other unplanned conditions that require reviewed and signed within 6 days of receipt of removing the unit from service before the end the Hotline, of the next weekend. Forced events include Ctartup failures and events initiated while the HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is GROUP GUIDELINES available but not in service. Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power FUEL RELlABILITY INDICATOR - operation. Power operation is defined as -This indicator is defined as the steady state greater than 30% power. The 13 parameters primary coolant b131 activity, corrected for the tracked are steam generator pH, cation tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, common purification rate. sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, Tramo uranium is fuel which has been hydrazine, lion, copper, and condensate pump deposited on reactor cor6 internals from discharge dissolved oxygen, previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF process. SERVICE Steady state is defined as continuous Total number of in line chemistry instruments operations above 85 percent power for at l east that are out of service in the Secondary System seven days, and the Post Accident Sampling System . This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized (PASS). letdown purification rate. The FRI has also been calculated using Fort Calhoun's actualletdown INVENTORY / CCUP.ACY purification rate. These calculations revealed The percentage of line items that are counted that the use of the plant's actual rate would each month by the warehouse which need result in an approximate 45% increase in FRI count adjustments, data. INVOICE BREAKDOWN GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING The number of invoices that are on hold due to DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT shelf life, COE, and miscellaneous reasons. This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS released from the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quizzes and exams that Gre administered GROSS HEAT RATE and passed each month. The License Candidate = Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total Exams indicator tracks Training performance for thermal energy in British Thermal Units (BTU) Safety Enhancement Program item Number 68. produced by the reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by the generator in LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING - kilowatt hours (KWH). DISCHARGED T/) THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator dhplays the volume of liquid - HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED ' radioactive waste re!aased from the radioactive The total amount (in Kilograms) of non-waste monitor tanks. The. curies from all halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated releases from the Fort Calhoun Station to the hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste-

1ssouri River are also shown.

. produced by..the Fort Calhoun Station each - l month. ' GABLE / REPORTABLE INCIDENTS usECURITY) HOTLINES. The total number of security incidents for the The number of Hotlines that are initiated, reporting month depicted in two graphs. This closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A indicator tracks security performance for Safety Hotline is a training document sent out for Enhancement Program item Number 58, immediate review. The Hotline shouid be 83

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicatior R: port Indicator Definitions MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS which are written af ter the start of the The m nber of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data Refuelino Outage will be tabeled Emergent System (NPRDS) components with more than MWO's. Also shown is the number of MWR's one failure and the number of NPRDS which have been identified for the 1991 components with more than two failures during Refueling Outage, but have not yet been the last twelve months. converted to MWO's. This indicator tracks performance for SEP Reference Number 3t. MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non outage NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS maintenance work orders that remain open at The number of radiological hot spots which the end of the reporting month. This indicator have been identified and documented to exist at was added to the Performance indicators Report the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of the to trend open corrective non outage reporting month. A hot spot is a small localized maintenance work orders as stated in Safety source of radiation. A hot spot occurs when the Enhancement Program (SEP) ltem No. 36. contact dose rate of an item is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item's dose MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN rate is equal to or greater than 100 mRom/ hour. This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders by several NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY categories that remain open at the end of the DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS reporting month. This indicator tracks SUBMITTED maintenance performance for Safety The data plotted is the total number of NPROS Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 36. component failures (confirmed and possible) and the number of confirmed NPRDS MAINTENANCE OVERTIME component failures. The total number of NPRDS The percentage of overtime hours compared to component failures are based on the number of normal hours for maintenance. This includes faliure reports that have been sent to the OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel. Institute of Nuclear Operations (INPO), Confiimed NPRDS component failures are based MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING upon failurs reports that have been accepted by The percent of material requests (MR's) for INPO. Possible NPRDS component f ailures are issues with their request date the same as their based upon failure reports that are still under need date compared to the total number of review by INPO. M R's. NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group MATERIAL REQUESTS AWAITING APPROVAL program which has been outlined by INPO and The number of material requests awaiting implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station. approval at the end of the reporting month broken down by their age in days. NUMBER OF OUT-OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION A control room instrument that cannot perform EXPOSURE its design function is considered as out of-The total maximum amount of Gamma and service. A control room instrument which has Neutron (Whole Body) r6diation received by an had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written individual person working at the Fort Calhoun for it and has not been repaired by the end of Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual the reporting period is considered out of service

basis, and will be counted. The duration of the out of-seivice condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room MWO OVERALL STATUS (1991 REFUELING instruments.

OUTAGE) The total number of Maintenance Work Orders NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED (MWO's) that have been written for completion IN LER'S during the 1991 Refueling Outage. MWO's The numbn of Licensee Event Reports (LERM 84

Fort Calhoun Performance Indicator heport Indicator Definitions attributed to personne! error on the original LER planning is completed and the scope of the submittal. This indicator trends personnel work is clearly defined, these Modification performance for SEP ltem No.15. Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS may be cancelled. All of these different phases RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS require review. The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) that

3) Design Engineering Backlog /In Frogress result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during Nuclear Planning he:; assigned a year in which the reporting. This indicator tracks missed ST's construction will be completed and design work for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item may be in progress.

Numbers 60 and 61.

4) Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET construction has begun but the modification has The year to date budget compared to the actual not been accepted by the System Acceptance expenditures for operations and maintenance.

Committee (SAC).

5) Design Engineering Update Backlog /In OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION Progress REPORTS PED has received the Modification Completion This indicator displays the total number of Report but the drawings have not been outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's),

updated. the number of CAR's that are older than six The above mentioned outstanding modifications months and the number of modification related do not include modifications which are CAR's. proposed for cancellation. OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (1991 REFUELING REQUESTS (EAR's) OUTAGE) The total number of open EAR's and the The number of projucts which affect the scoce number of open EAR's broken down by their of the 1991 Refueling Outage and the number age in months. This indicator tracks of projects for which detailed schedules have performance for SEP item 62. been submitted. This indicator tracks performance for SEP Reference Number 31. OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE any state between the issuance of a ACTION REPORTS Modification Number and the completion of the The number of overdue Corrective Action drawing update. Reports (CAR's) and the number of CAR's

1) Form FC 1133 Backlog /In Progress which received extensions broken down by The Form FC 1133 has not been plant organization for the last 6 months.

approved.

2) Modification Requests Being Reviewed PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED This category includes:

MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES A.) Modification Requests that are not yet The percent of the number of completed reviewed maintenance activities as compared to the B.) Modification Requests being reviewed by the number of scheduled maintenance activities Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) each week. This percent is shown for each C.) Modification Requests being reviewed by the craft. Maintenance activities include MWR's, Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and other These Modification Requests may be reviewed miscellaneous activities. These indicators track several times before they are approved for Maintenance performance for SEP Reference accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these Number 33. Modification Requests are returned to j Engineering for more information, some PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE approved for eva!uation, some approved for (CUMULATIVE) study, and some approved for planning. Once Collective radiation exposure is the total 85

Fort Calhoun Station Performanco Indicatior Report Indicator Definitions external whole body dose received by all on site RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM personnel (including contractors.and visitors) The number of idel.tified poor radiological work during a time period, as measured by the practices (PRWP) for the reporting month. This thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) Collective indicator tracks radiological work performance radiation exposure is reported in units of man-for Safety Enhancement (SEP) ltem Number 52. rem. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety Enhancement Program RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL (SEP) ltem Number 54. MAINTENANCE - The ratio of preventive maintenance (including PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE surveillance testing and calibration procedures) The ratio of the number of turnovers to average to the sum of non outage corrective employment. A turnover is a vacancy created maintenance and preventive maintenance by voluntary resignation from the company. completed over the reporting period. The ratio, Retirement, death, termination, transfers within expressed as a percentage, is calculated based the company, and part time employees are not on man hours. This indicator tracks preventive considered in turnover, maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 41. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE This indicator is defined as the percentage of RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY preventive maintenance items in the month that RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) were not completed by the scheduled date plus The number of injuries requiring more than a grace period equal to 25 percent of the noimal first airl per 200,000 manhours worked, scheduled irgerval. This indicator tracks This indicator trends personnel performance for preventive maintenance activities for Safety SEP ltem No.15 and SEP ltem 26. Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 4'i. RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF. The RO license examination pass ratio for NRC HOURS OUT OF LIMIT administered Generic Fundamentals Exams The percent of hours out of limit are for six (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, primary chemistry parameters divided by the NRC administered license requalification exams, total number of hours possible for the month. and OPPD administered license requalification The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, exams. This indicator tracks Training Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and performance for Sr'ety Enhancement Program Suspended Sotids. EPRI limits are used. Item Number 68. PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY (MAINTENANCE) PERFORMANCE INDEX The number of identified incidents concerning The Chemistry Performance index (CPI) is a maintenance procedural problems, the number calculation based on the concentration of key - of closed IR's related to the use of procedures impurities in the secondary side of the plant. (includes the aumber of closed IR's caused by These key impurities are the most likely cause procedural noncompliance), and the number of of deterioration of the steam generators. The closed procedural noncompliance IR's. This chemistry parameters are reported only for the indicator trends personnel performance for SEP period of time greater than 30 percent power. Item Numbers 15 and 41. J SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PROGRESS OF 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PERFORMANCE INDEX (CONTINUED) PLANNING The followine equadon is how the CPI is j The number of modifications approved for calculated: planning (to determine feasibility) for completion - CPI - ((Ka/0.8) + 1Na/20) + (0 /10)) / 3 2 during the 1991 Refueling. This indicator tracks Where the fcliowing are monthly averages of: performance for SEP Reference Number 31. Ka = average blowdown cation conductivity 86

- -, ~ _. . - - - ~ ~ -.. - Fort Cclhoun Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions Ns = average blowdown sodium concentration environmental conditions (i.e., rain, snow, frost, i Oy = average condensate pump discharge. fog, sunspots, shade). ( dissolved oxygen concentration

5) Security Computer Failures. Failure of the

- multiplexer, central processing unit, and other SECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN computer hardware and software. This category - The number of Security loggable/ reportable does not include software problems caused by Incidents broken down into the following operator error in using the software, categories..

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ray,

1) Licensee Designt ted Vehicles (LOVs) metal, or explosive detectors and other incidents related to the use of LOVs, e.g., keys equipment used to search for contraband, This left in the vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to also includes incidents where the search return keys.

equipment is found defective or did not function 2 2) Security Badges properly during testing. Incidents associated with improper use' and.

7) Door Hardware Failures. Falture of the door handling of security badges, incidenta include alarm and door hardware such as latches, security badges that are lost, taken out of the electric strikes, dootknobs, locks, etc.

protected area,'out of control on site, or

8) Card Reader Failures Incidents caused by Linadvertently destroyed or broken, mechanical breakdown of card readersi but not

3) Access Control and A'uthorization improper use of the card readers. (See Access

? Administrative and procedural errors Control and Authorization)

associated with the use of the card access This indicator tracks security performance for system such as tallgating, incorrect security.

Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) ltem badge issued, and improper escort procedures. Number 58. = This also includes incidents that were caused by - incorrect access authorization information-SPARE PARTS ISSUED entered into the security system computer. The dollar value of the spare pans issued for - 4) Security Key Control : the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting incidents involving Security key control, e.g., period. lost Security keys, Security keys removed from

gite, or fauure to return Security keys <This type SPO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION of event does not reflect incidents concerning.

PASS RATIO-LDV keys;- The SRO license examination pass ratio for NRC This in&cator. tracks security performance for administered Generic Fundamentals Exams. E Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, Number 58.~ . NRC administered license requalification exams, and OPPD administered license ragualificatio'n SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES exams. This indicator tracks Training ' Incidents involving alarm system f ailures, CCTV performance for Safety Enhancement Program: f ailures, security computer failures, search . Item Number 68. equipment feitures, door hardware failures, and card reader failures. These system failures are STAFFING LEVEL

further categorized as follows:

The actual staffing level and the authorized

11) Alarm System Failure. Detection s.ystem.

staffing level for the Nuclear Operations svents involving false / nuisance alarms and Division, the Production Engineering Division, ! mechanical failures, and the Nuclear Services Division.

2) Alarm System Environmental Failuresy I

NA - Degradations to detection system performance . as a result.of environmental conditions (i.ei, The not generation (sum) produced by the Fort. Calhoun Station during the reporting month. f rain, snow, frost). - 3)CCTV Failures Mechanical f ailures to all

CCTV hardware components.

The total number of Pick Tickets that were 4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradations - to CCTV performarce as a result of "8 #IN * "

total number of Pick Tickets that were 87

Fort Calhoun Statier Performanes indicatior Fvp" ort Indicator Definitions generated during the reporting month with no defined as follows: parts available.

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution.

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the The number of temporary mechanical and reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods electrical configurations to the plant's systems.

that is caused by actuation of the reactor

1) Temporary configurations are defined as protectiori system. The scram signal may have electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are been spurious.

Installed in the plant operating systems and are

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, caused actuation of the reactor f.rotection schematic, connection, wiring, or flow system logic was provided from one of the

diagrams, sensors monitoring plant parameters and

2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for conditions, rather than the manual scram Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or room.

Operating Procedures are not considered as

4) Critical means that during the steady state temporary modifications unless the jumper or condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the block remains in place after the test or effective multiplication f actor (k gg) was equal e

procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks to one. installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifications. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -

3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary (INPO DEFINITION) modification. Jumpers and blocks ' Mh are This indicator is defined as the sum of the installed and for which EEAR's have been following safety system actuations:

submitted, will be considered as a temporary 1)he number of unplanned Emergency Core modifications until final resolution of the EEAR Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result and the jumper or block is removed or is from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or pen; anently recorded on the drawings. from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal

This indicator tracks temporary modifications 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item power system actuations that result from a loss Number 62 & 71, of power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING when an actuation setpoint for a safety system The total number of student hours of training is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and signalis generated (ECCS only), and major Radiation Protection, Technical Support, equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned General Employee Training, and Other training means that the system actuation was not part conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

of a planned test or evolution. TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING The ECCS actuations to be counted are CONTAMINATIONS actuations of the high pressum injection Reportable skin and clothing contaminations system, the low pressure injection system, or above background levels greater than 5000 the safety injection tanks, dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS personn t performance for SEP ltem No.15. (NRC DEFINITION) The number of safety system actuations which UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS include (gnjy) the High Pressure Safety injection WHILE CRITICAL System, the Low Pressure Safety injection This indicator is defined as the number of System, the Safety injection Tanks, and the unplanned automatic scrsms (reactor protection Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC system logic actuations) that occur while the classification of safety system actuations reactor is critical. The indicator is further includes actuations when major equipment is 88

Fort Calhoun PGrformance indicator Report Indicator Deft..lons operated and when the logic systems for the number of non COE stock receipts, the number above safety systems are challenged. of COE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non COE receipts, and the numbs of VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECT 40N HOURS direct charge COE receipts which occurred This indicator is defined as the number of during the reporting month, violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC WAREHOUSE RETURNS inspection hours. The violations are reported in The percentage of the total number of the year that the inspection was actually warehouse returns, the number of spare parts performed and not based on when the returns, the number of standard stores returns, inspection report is received. The hours and the number of direct charge returns reported for each inspection report are used as compared to the total number of warehouse the inspection hours, issues. VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indicator also shows the volume of low level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that has been shipped off site for processing, and the volume of solid dry active waste which has been snipped off site for processing, Low level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear powar plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) ltem Number 54, WAREHOUSE ISSUES The total number of warehouse issues, the number of non COE stock issues, the number of COE stock issues, the number of direct charge non COE issues, and the number of direct charge COE issues which occurred during the reporting month. WAREHOUSE RECElPTS The total number of warehouse receipts, the 89

Fort Calhoun Station PGrformance Indicator Report index to SEP Indicators The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators index is to list SEP ltems and the related performance indicators with parameters that can be trended. SEP Reference Number 15. Increase HPES and IR Accountability.Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Nove apliance incidents (Maintenance).................................................... 25 Total S kin a nd Clo thin g Con ta mina tion s...................................................................... 4 2 R ecorda ble inju ry C a s e s Fre au e ncy Ra te..................................................................... 6 2 N umbe r of Personn el Erro rs R e ported in LER s............................................................. 6 5 CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported..... 80 SEP Reference Number 20 l' Ouality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported..... 80 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional inspections CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported..... 80 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies S t a ffi n g L e v e l 1....................................................................................................... 6 6 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury Frequency R ate................................................................................. 1 1 R e c ord able inju ry Cas e s Freq u ency R ate.....................................,............................. 64 SEP Reference Number 31 . Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management. raining MWO O verall Status (19 91 Ref ueling Outage)............................................................ -72 Progress of 19 91 Outage Modification Planning........................................................... 73 Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage)........................................................... 74' SEP Reference Number 33 ll - Develop On Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule l Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities l ( Ele ctric al M aint e n a nc e )..................................................................................' 2 7 . ( Pre s s u re Eq uip m e n t).................................................................................... 2 8 ( G e ne ral M aint e n a n e e)................................................................................... 2 9 ( M e c h a nic a i M ain t e n a n e e ).............................................................................. 3 0 ' (I n s tru m e n t a tio n & Cont rol)........................................................................... 31 ' SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog . Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non. Outage Maintenance)......................... 26 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance).....................19 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule R a tio o f Pre ve ntive to To tal M aintena nce.................................................................... 21 Preve ntive M ainte na nc e i tems O ve rd u e.................................................................... 2 2 l' 90

Fort Calhoun Station Performance indicator Report Index to SEP Indicators SEP Reference Number 43 Implement the Check Valve Test Program Ch e c k V a lv e F ailu r e R a t e.......................................................................................... 3 5 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)..................................................... 25 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program D oc u m e n t R e vi e w................................................................................................... 1 5 SEP Reference Number 52 Establish Supe"isory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Ra diolo gic al Wo r k Pra ctice s Prog ra m...................................................................... 4 4 SEP Reference Number 54 Ccmplete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Person nel Ra dia tion Expo s ur e ( C u mula tiv e)................................................................ 9 Volum e o f Lo w-Le v el Solid Ra dioa ctive Wa s t e............................................................ 10 Total Skin a nd Clothin g Co.ta mina tion s..................................................................... 4 2 Dec onta mina t ed Au xilia ry Buildin g............................................................................ 4 3 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Log g a ble/R e porta ble incid e nts (S ecurity)..................................................................... 4 8 h c u tity I n cid e n t Br e a kd o wn..................................................................................... 4 9 S e cu rity S ys t e m Fa il u r e s.......................................................................................... 5 0 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports....................... 32 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedul Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports....................... 32 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers Te m p o ra ry M odif ica tio n s......................................................................................... 6e Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's).................................................. 61 Engin eering Cha no e N otice Status............................................................................. 6 2 Engine e ring Cha n g e N o tice Brea kdo wn...................................................................... 6 3 SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training S R O / R O Lice ns e Ex a min ation Pa s s R a tio............................................................... 67 Lic e n s e C a n did a t e E x a m s...................................................................................... 6 8 SEP Reference Number 71 l improve Controls over Temporary Modifications T e m po r a ry M od i f i c a ti o n s....................................................................................... 6 0 91

Fcrt Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Distribution List J.C. Adams R. M. Hawkins D. G. Ried R. L. Andrews M. C. Hendrickson G. K. Samide G. L. Anglehart R. R. Henning T. J. Sandene W. R. Bateman K. R. Henry B. A. Schmidt K. L. Belek J. B. Herman S. T. Schmitz A. D. Bilau G. J. Hill F. C. Scofield B. H. Blome - K. C. Holthaus L. G. Sealock C. N. Bloyd L. G. Huliska H. J. Sefick J.P.Bobba C. J, Husk D. K. Sentel C. E. Boughter K. C. Hyde P. Sepcenko M. A. Breuer R. L. Jaworski J. W. Shannon C. J. Brunnert R. A. Johansen R. W. Short M. W. Butt J. W. Johnson J. R. Shuck C. A. Carlson W. C. Jones C. F. Simmons J. W. Chase J. D. Kecy E. L. Skaggs G. R. Chatfield J. D. Keppler J. L. Skites A. G, Christensen D. D. Kloock F. K. Smith A.J. Clark J. C. Knight R. L. Sorenson O. J. Clayton D. M. Kobunski K. E. Steele R. P. Clemens G. J. Krause W. Steele J. L. Connolley L. J. Kripal H. F. Sterba G. M. Cook J, B. Kuhr R. K. Stultz M. R. Core L. T. Kusek G. A. Teeple S. R. Crites L.E. Labs M. A. Tesar D. W. Dale M. P. Lazar T. G. Therkildsen R. C. DeMeulmeester. R, C. Learch P. L. Thompson R.D.DeYoung S. E. Lee J. W. Tills D. C. Dietz R. E. Lewis D. R. Trausch D. E. Dirrim R. C. Liebentritt P, R. Turner K. S. Dowdy. C. J. Linden J. M. Uhland J. A. Drahota B. R. Livingston C. F. Vanecek T. R. Dukarski J. M. Lofshult G. L. Van Osdel R. G. Eurich J. H. MacKinnon J. M. Waszak H. J. Faulhaber G. D. Mamoran W. O. Weber M.A.Ferdig-J. W. Marcil - G. R. Williams V. H. Frahm N. L. Marfice S. J. Wiltrett F. F. Franco D. J. Matthews W. C. Woerner M. T. Frans J. M. Mattice H. K. Fraser T. J. Mcivor J. F. W. Friedrichsen R. F. Mehaffey S. K. Gambhir R. A. Miser J. K. Gaspcr K. J. Morris W. G. Gates D. C. Mueller M. O. Gautier R. J. Mueller S. W. Gebers W. L. Neal J. M. Glantz J. B. Newhouse J. T. Gleason M. W. Nichols L. V. Goldberg C. W. Norris D. J. Golden J. T. O'Connor D. C. Gorence W. W. Orr R. E.-Gray L. L. Parent M. J. Guinn T. L. Patterson E. R. Gundal R. L. Phelps A. L.~ Gurtis T. M. Reisdorff R.H. Guy A. W. Richard 92

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Summary Section ADVERSE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATf LNTION REPDRT A Performance Indicator which has data +*oresenting three(3) consecutive months of This section lists the indicators which show declining performance constitutes an adverse inadequacies at compared to the OPPD coal trend. The Adverse Trend Report explains the and indicators which shW inadequacies as conditions under which certain indicators are compared to 'h6 industry upper quartile. The showing adverse trends. Indicators with data indicators wir. De compared to the industry showing an apparent adverse trend which is ngj upper quartile as relevant to that indicator, con'sidered adverse, will have an explanstion which defines the reason why an adverse trend Forced Outaae Raig does not exist. The forced outage rate for the month of January 1991 was reported as being higher Forced Outaae Rate than the Fort Calhoun goal of 2.4% The rise in The forced outage rate for the Fort Calhoun the forced outagt rate during the month of Station has been increasing since July of 1990. August 1990 was due to seal problems One forced outage occurred in the month of encountered in reactor coolant pump RC 3A. August 1990 and was due to seal problems These problems resulted in 172.6 forced outage encountered in reactor coolant pump RC 3A. hours. During the month of September 1990 Another forced outage occurred in September and October 1990 the plant was shutdown due 1990 and continued into October 1990. This to design basis questions concerning forced outage was due to design basis containment cooling capabilities. This forced questions concerning containment cooling outage resulted in 212.0 forced outage hours capabilities, A third forced outage was reported being reported. During the month of November during November 1990. This forced outage was 1990 another forced outage occurred due to an due to an Instrument Air System line failure in Instrument Air System line failure. This forced the Turbine Building. A fourth forced outage resulted in 60.3 forced outage hours belno occurred in December 1990 and continued into reported. Dunno December 1990 another forced January 1991. This forced outage was caused outage occurred and continued into by a Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) January 1991. This forced outage was due to a housing failure. Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) housing failure. This outage resulted in 595.1 End of Adverse Trend Report, forced outage hours being reported. Gross Heat Rate The gross heat rate for the month of January 1991 was above the Fort Calhoun goal of 10,150 BTU /KWH. The high cross heat rate during the month of January was primarily due to the startup after the forced cutage which ended in January. Eauivalent Availability Factor The EAF for the month of January was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 69L This low - EAF value was due to 190.8 forced outage hours which were reported during January. Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) The FRI was reported above the Fort Calhoun goal of 1.4 nanocuries/ gram for the month of i January. The FRI value for January using the actual plant letdown rate was reported as 2.16 nanocuries/ gram. 93

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Summary Section Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Calhoun Station has been involved in various The ratio of preventive to total maintenance derates and forced outages since startup in was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of May. Another reason for the high CPI values is 60% and below the industry upper quartile the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station uses value of 57.7 This ratio decreased due to the morpholine to control PH. The use of high number of hou*s in which maintenance morpholine also raises the CPI 919es. was involved in corrective maintenance activities associated with the forced outage Temocrary Modifications (Excbdino Scaffoldinoi which occurred in December and continued into The number of temporary modifications which January. are installed in the plant is currently above the Fort Calhoun goal of 15 temporary Number of Out of Service Control Room modifications. Part of the reason for the Instruments increase in the total number of instelled 'lhe number of out-of service control room temporary modifications, is the f act that quite a instruments was reported as being above the few temporary modifications require a refueling Fort Calhoun goal of 15 out of service control outage for removal. Currently,9 temporary room instruments and above the industry upper modifications require a refueling ou': ge for quartile value of 7 out of service control room

removal, instruments.

End of Management Attention Report. Percent of Comoteted Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance) The percent of completed mainteriance activities which were scheduled for completion during the month of January for Esectrical Maintenance was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of BOL Percent of Comoleted Scheduled Maintenance Activities (General Maintenance) The percent of completed maintenance activities which were scheduled for completion during the - month of January for Pressure Equipment was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% Check Valve Failure Rate The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, as of the end of October, was above the industry check valve failure rate. The reason for the high check valve failure rate is that the plant is performing maintenance on check valves which have not been tosted for failures before. The check valve failure rate is expected to decrease as the check valves are maintained and monitored through the Check Valve Program. Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index The CPI value for the Fort Calhoun Station has been above the industry upper quartile value of O.24 since the first CPI value was taken after startup in May of 1990. Part of the reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort i 94 l 1

. ~ -. n-._.-_---_.-. .. - -. _. ~ _ - - - ~. Fort CClhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Summary Section PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS The format of the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report has been' changed. The Adverse Trend Report, Indicators - Needing Increased Management Attention, and the Performance L heator. Report improvements sections are incorporated into the Summary Section. Four Indicators have been changed. One of these indicators is in the Chemistry and Radiological Section, two of these indicators are - in the Security Section, and one of these - indicators is in the Design Engineering Section. The Volume of Solid Radioactive Waste -Indicator has been changed.Two categories - have been added to this indicator. One of the -

categories that was added is the amount of radioactive oil which was shipped off site for proccssing. The other category which was-added was the volume of dry solid radioactive
waste which has been shipped off site for

-- processing; The processing mentioned above is , completed by the Scientific Ecology Group (SEGl.- SEG processes this waste to reduce its : 3 volume before actual burial. The Security incident Breakdown Indicator has

been changed. This indicator now shows the -

E number of loggable/ reportable incidents - t concerning Licensee Desic'1ated Vehicles- -(LDVs); Security Badges;' Access Control and - L Authorization; and Security Key Control. - The Security Svatem Failures Indicator has been- > changed.This indicator now shows the numb 6r - of. Alarm System Failures,-~ Alarm System - Environmental Failures, CCTV. Failures, CCTV l Environmental Failures, Security Computer :. ' ~ - Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door ' Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures. The Outstandina Modifications Indicator has - been changed. The number of outstanding - modifications in each category and the total-number of outstanding modifications no longer - reflect the' number of outstanding modifications -

which are proposed for cancellation.

End of Indicator improvement Report.' j! 95 u

I FORT CAlllOUN STATION OPERATINO CYCLES AND REFUELINO OUTAOE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH) Cumulative (MWil) Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01US 3,299,639 3,299,639 p 1st Refueling 02/01DS 05/09D5 Cycle 2 05/09n5 10/01D6 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling - 10/01D6 12/1306 Cycle 3 12/13n6 09/3057 - 2,805.927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30n7 - 12/0907 Cycle 4 -12/0907 10/1408 3,026,832 12,985.720 4th Refueling 10/1408 12/24n8 Cycle 5 12/24 0 8 01/16/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling - 01/18/60 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 - 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8

04/07/83.- 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling '

09/28/85 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 .10th Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/87 Cycle 11 . 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505-111th Refueling - 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 - 01/31/89 - 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 l12th Refueling 02/17/90 - 05/29/90 Cycle 13# 05/29/90 - 09/28/91

Planned Dates lith Refueling #

09/28/91 12/23/91 Cycle 14# 11/22/91- 02/12/93 14th Refueling -02/12/93 - 05/06/93 Cycle 15# 05/06/93 09/30/94 - 15th Refueling #- 09/30/94 - 11/26/94 ! FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS ' RECORDS"

First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) _ September 26,1973 -- Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 1.ongest Run (477 days) June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Oeneration (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWil)(Cycle 11) June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988 .}}

ML20029B214

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search