ML20028H631

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.July- September 1990

ML20028H631
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/31/1990
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V32-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V32-I1, NUDOCS 9101110235
Download: ML20028H631 (36)

Text

__ _._.

l l

I l

l NUREG-0750 l

Vol. 32 Index 1

^

i INDEXES.TO l

.WUCLEAR REGULATORY.

COMMISSION ISSUANCES JuV-LSeptember 1990 j

f p

g 1

y

=g

?g fs 1

4kyfV i

I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

l 9101110235 901231 50 PDR

J' l

4 4

i Available from Superintentendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Offico Post Offico Box 37082

)

Washington, D.C. 20013-7082 i

A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issuos, 4 indexos, and 2-4 hardbound oditions for this publication.

1 l

Single copios of this publication are available from National Technical Information Servico, Springfield, VA 22161 l

l l

hm;;TA**;UNid'+ NW? '

l i

I i<

il

'l 1

Errors in this publication may be reported to the Division of Froodom of Information and Publications Services l

Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Washington, DC 20555 (301/492-8925) e I

I i

I i

NUREG-0750 i

l Vol. 32 t

i f

index 1

-l II l

i

\\ JEXES TO 4

1 H,

NUCLEAR REGULA ORY 1

j COV VISSIO\\

ISSUANCES i

i l

July - September 1990 t

i t

Wag @#tttitM!444Ff heidiast4 i!

i f

U.S. B i

\\

Prepared by the Division of Freedom of Information and Pubhcations Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 (301/492-8925)

-^-MtdWM vh41 nee m

I i

I Foreword Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic i

Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LDP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors' Uccisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in ti,ls document.

i Diese digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information elements com',non to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

Case name (owner (s) of facility)

Full text reference (volume and pagination)

Issuance number t

Issues raised by appellants Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)

Name of facility, Docket number j

Subject matter of issues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction pennit, operating license, etc.)

j, Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

?

j These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:

!l

1. Case Name Index

'Ihe case ruune index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of I

the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of merpecei;%n19gj issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.

"MF,

2. Digests and lleaders p

The headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAD),

the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LDP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for ~ ~

I Rulemaking, The header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

'The digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the I

issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically.

111 i

l

'l d

t

3. I.egal Citations indes His index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alphanu-merical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. Dese citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally fol-lowed by phrases that show the application of the citation m the particular issuance.

These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

4. Subject Index

\\

i i

Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphatetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are followed by phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

5. l'acility index The index consists of an alphabetical arrangeri,ent of fzility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of issuance, issuance number, and full text reference, we gg,wer s k' D'" ~%hM"!

.m l

iv i

7

1 I

}

t CASE N AMI: INDl1

)

All CitLMICAt, ISOTOPL l.NRACitMINT, INC.

CONSTRU(*!10N ItkMTT MOD!nCAllON AND SilOW CAUM, Ml:MORANDUM AND ORDijt (Ruhng on NRC Staff M4 ion fw surnmary thsimtmn and thanussal d thecang), IkdH Non.

f' 54fdD,50604 (AS!JIP No. 89 5%41 OM/SC) (Construcuan Pernut Nos cpl.P-1 and CPLP4),

f ISP 90 26, 32 NRC 30 (1990) f CLLYLLAND 11LCTK!C ttLUMINATING COMPANY, et al.

g Ort RA11NO IJCLN5L AMENDMINT; MLMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Denymg staff's and i

Ikauee's Manans for Reecnsiderstaun); Dmiet No. 5444401A 2 (A31SP Na 94605 0201A);

I ISP 9025,32 NRC 21 (1990) kl4UEST IUR AC*I10N; DIRECTOR'8 Dir!sION UNDLR 10 C.FR l 2.206, Ikdat Na 54440, DD 906,32 NRC 195 (1990)

COMMONWIALTil LD150N COMPANY 1.NK)RCEMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI.R (Arpnwmg $cttlernmi Agnar.an ord larmmaung Proceedmas), Indet Nos 54234CM,50265.OM (AstSP No 94609 02 OM) (LA 9Nn2)

(1acibiy Operating 1kenas Nas DPR 29 and DI%30), (JIP 9025,32 NRC 85 (IWO)

CURATORS OF 111L UNTYER$ TTY OF MISSOURI MAT 1.R!AL3 IJCINSL AMENDMINT; MLMORANDUM AND ORDi* Onterve on' Motim far thrected Ceruficatim), Ikdot Ms 7400270, 3402278 M1 A (ASISP No. 90 613-02 M1A) f (TRUMP S Project) (Byprtduct 1ketiss Na 24 00513 32; $pecial Nudear Maiertals ikmse No.

t

$NM 247), IJLP-9423,32 NRC 7 (1990)

MAT 1.R!ALA iJCINSL AMLNDMINT; MLMORANDUM AND ORDtJL (Canplesmess of the lleanns f*tle); thdet Nus,7NU270,3402275 M1A (A$lSP Na 94613 02 MLA) (TRUMP $

1%jat) (Byseudast Ikena. Na 2400513 32; $pocial Nuclear Matenals (kenne No. $NM 247),

ISP-90 27,32 NRC 40 (1990) lWrfth#1pNik,4 MATI.k:A1A [JC1N50 AMLNDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORD12 (Tanporary $tay Requec),

[ "' 9 49&il b M, t

thdei Nis 7Nio270,30-02278-M1A (As!JIP No. 94613 01M1A) (Re: TRUMP 5 Pnyect)

(Bypnduct thense Na 24(K1513 32, $pecial Nucles Maienals thense No SNM 247), ISP-9030,

{

32 NRC 95 (1990)

ITORIDA IOWIR AND LJGirl COMPANY

}

OPLRATING IJCIME AMI'NDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R (Motion to thamias);

Ikdet No. 542540tA 5, 542510tA 5 (A3 TSP No. 90602 0101A 5) (Tedtrucal $pedficatims Replacanent) (hcility Operstmg thense Nos. DPR 31. DPR41); IJIP 9424,32 NRC 12 (1990)

OPLRATINO IJCtN50 AMENDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Cmsideratim of Ptosible sus Spora lasues), Ihdet Nts-542540!A 5,5425i OIA 5 (AstJLP Na 94602 01 OLA-5) j (Technical $pecificatama Replacemma) (f acihty Operaung thenacs No DPR 31 DPR 41),

1EP 9032,32 NRC 181 (1990)

OLORGIA IUWER COMPANY et al-OPLRATING IJCLNSL AMLNDMLNT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Ontervmtion Paitim),

thdet Ms. 54424-01A, 54425 OLA (A$1SP Na 946t? 03-OLA) (1:scihty Operating IJeanses l

NPF-68 and NPF 81); ISP-9429,32 NRC 59 (1990) i PUlltJC Sl*VICL COMPANY OF NEW l(AMPSIIIRIL st al.

OPLkATING IJCLNSL, DICISION; thda Nos. 54443 01. $0444-OL (Offaite Imergary Piartning l

leaues); AIAB 934,32 NRC 1 (1990), AIAll-935,32 NRC 57 (1990), AIAB 936,32 NRC 75 (1990), AIAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990) i 1

1

.~... - ----

?

i CASI' NAMl; IND13 i

OPLRATING tJCLNil, MLMORANDUM AND ORDLR RLGARDING RIJ1RRED QULSTIONS; thdet Nts. $4443 01,50-444 GL (Offute Emergency hamung lasuesk ALAB 939, 32 NRC 163 (l990) g klQUI.3T POR ACDON; DIRECTOR'S DICISION UNDl;R 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206, Ihdet Na 50443 4

(Ikous No. NIP 86), DD 944,32 NRC 45 (1990), DD 945,32 NRC 109 (1990)

Rolti.RT L DIGllLRillJt LNIORCEMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (A;ynwuig Settiament Agreenent and Termuuun Prmoedinas). Ikda Na

(

LAense timlied to IW llandling, No. SOP 2365 t). IJIP 9428,32 NRC 85 (IWO)35

(

TUL5A DAMMA RAY, INC.

LNIORCEMthT; NJrlCL OF llLARING AND Crnti.R MATTLRS, Ikdet Na (A$tJIP No 90618M OvP) (LA $9-223) (Material Licane Na 3412319CvP 1(r) (1990) 35-1717d 41), IJIP 9431, 32 NRC Vl'RMORT YANKLis NUCtJAR ICWER COklORA110N

(

Oli.RATINO tJCLNSE AMr.NDMLNT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, lhda No. Sa27101A

($ pent IW fwd Ammimenth Ct1947. 32 NRC 129 (1990)

OPLRATLNG IJCLNSE AMLNDMINT; NUrtCL; Ikda No.

Amaulmenth ALAll 938,32 NRC 154 (1990) 50 2710LA (speu IW 1%1 i

f i

i

.I l

l 4

e

.f sq;;@.*giFlh mH y%

Q, I

i f

I I

l i

t I

i g',

I l

l r

i

-3 i

I l

1

. j i

i 4

i t

I i

w

I e

I i

i DIG 13TS

!$50ANCl.5 OF THl: NUCLJ.Ak RI'GL't.ATokY COMMLisION CU-90 7 V12 MORT YANKII NUCLLAR IOWTJL COR10 RATION (Vermont Yankee Nuclear her j

i Sutmn), thxaet No. M271 OLA ($ pent twl1%1 Amendnwnt). OPERATINO UCEN5E AMENDMl;NT; Sepsmber 21,1990, MI;MORANDUM AND ORDf.R A

The Canmissim dismism dus pmeedmg im du wuwmed motum c(de Lkensee, Nmethcicas, Uw Cummisake feels that censin tnature reised by de Intervenm, de Ucenses, and de Ar5=al Itoned worant a respor.se end, therefme, uses this occasion to coneneni on 0 <=e matters. The Commission also notes that by emfmmg us Intervenan' case to the comewkm that day $enselves drahed and filed,it sesed in accord with almost 20 years of Cunmissmn Junspruderst il

• fte Comnussian's opirvan in CU-9M,31 NRC 333 (1990), made clear dist low prsdubihty is Ow key to e;qdying hTPA's rule of reannn test to contenuons that allege that a specifg accident scenano prismts e aigruncant envinarnental impset Diat must be evaluated.

C The Commission's opnion in CU-9M,31 NRC 333 (1990), made clear usat in the future, when epplying Ow

• rule of reason" test egaunt which environmental enntenuons are to be judged wider hT.PA, a fmdmg that an acculent scenarlo is remats and speculative must be more spect6e and more soundly based on the actual probabihties and accidmt scenance being analysed den they were in this case.

hM;pl$#$1pN)l 4

4 3

3 i

1 l

1 l

i 1

1 DIGl'STS ISSUANCl3 OF TilF. ATOhllC $AITTY AND LJCENSING APPL:AL BOARDS i

A1All 934 PUBUC $l%YlCE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSillRE,et al. (Seebrua $taum Uruts i and 2),

I Thist Nos $4443 0L,50444 OL (Offaite Ernersawy Planrung issuesk OPl; RATING UCENSL; July 9,1990, DIX 3510N A

no Appeal Board amtma that past e of on lkenema Itosed decaion in IJIP 9412,31 NP.C 427 (1990), that dismissed intervaior $nacoast Anu-Ibuuuan langus from the proceedmg be.ing emducted by the Ucerums lloard on certain runended issues.

D Nuewithstanding a sutsaguant erulesvor to preserw appellate r.shts, an intervmar's antmunnrient afiis imanuon to walk away from issues on ranand befm a hcaisms teard because of daagrecrnau over the effect of the remand upm fuD-power bcessee siahonrauan foredases any enutlanant that it may have had to p ucipate on those issues by way d a later appeal.

C na A veal Destd's affirmance of the danuisal of a leny relating to the issus ensing in me l

major segment of a case does nnt affect that pany's senidernent to participate in the adjudicauan d other kasues that are now pmdmg er trug5 anse in wher portians of the case.

ALAB 935 PUllWC SERVICli COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSiiIRE, et al. (Suhrma Statum, Unlia i and 2), Dodes Nos. 50443 0L,50444-OL (Offaits I.mergency Planning laaues), OPERARNO UCl;NSL; August 20,1990; DICISION A

ne Appealfroerd affirms the Ucenams lloard's determinadan in IJLP 8917,29 NRC $19 (1989),

that the aryhcants'amargency warning syetem for the Maassdumetu pution af the Seabrwa plume esposure t

pathway emergmcy pl.anning sane (EPZ) is in emplance with appLcable ergulatory requirements and guidance B

An offsas ernergency response plan nust estabhsh *rneans to pmvide early nautication and clear WN 8Pl!!NMNOn6l instrucuan to the poplace olihin the plunw sapem pathway (lW]? 10 CJA i $0 47(b)(3). Moreover, N,6

'b, sutsequeni to the tirns suie and local government omcials are naufied of a situsuon that requires urgent

}

acum, "b be design objecuvo of the prompt,aihhc rouficatmn systen: shall be to han the capatniny to

{

enacnuaDy comploie the irdual natifwaum of the pubbe within the.. IM within about 13 punuten" l

10 Cf.R. Part $0, Appendia E, llV.D.3. See also NURLO Ot54MT.MA RI.P.) (Rev.1), 'T' ruer a for Preparaum and livah.aum e( Radiological hnergery Respones Plans and INeparedness in Support of j

{,

Nudar Power Plants" (Nov.1980), Appendia 3 (hereafter NUREO.0634).

C A pnycr warning systern should constat of two separate cunements: (1) an

• alerting signal" and (2) *nnuficauon by cernmarcial broadcast (a g, IJ13)" NUREG-Or64, App. 3, at 3 3. Tiw " broadcast nok6 cation" cansment ful611s the regulatory requirement that the warning system provide the means for

• clar instructmn" to the public. Ses 10 Cf A 150 47(b)(5),

D ne term " initial emuncation" as incorporaied in the *ahuut 15 mmute" requirement in 10 C F R Part 50, A yendia E, llV.D.3 was intended only to encompana crrnplainn of the signal that naufas the l

pubbs that a radiningical emergency exista ao that they should take appnynats actim to seek addit..tal information (53. by sming to a pescribed emergency bnedeast stauan).

E Appenda E to 10 Cf.R. Part 50 is the only regulatory linung requirement for warnmg systems, as such, it - nd the NUREG-0654 guidance - La the standard with which apphcants' warning systen must eenply. Sw, e.g., Img Island Ughting Ca (shoreham Nuclear ibwer Statim, Unit 1). A1AD 900, i

28 NRC 273,290, wvhew declined, CU 8111,28 NRC 6(D (19881 F

hat regulatory guidance should be somewhat mero demandmg than a regulsiory requirement is not inuoward as it acts to ensure camphance with the regulatory requirement.

._.m s

a f

i

)

i g;l DIGl3TS 1%%UANCl3 Ol' Till: ATOMIC $Arin ANil LJCON5tNG Al'FFAL ltOAk!Hi i

0 Oiven Om diffenrus in laeguage of NURLO454, App. 3, da.lenna Out a warnwg sysum shnuld include om "[c}sphility for por6 ding tuuh en alert signal and an infamauanal ar instructimal messaga 1

.. within 15 minutes" and om language of 10 CJ.R. Pan 50, Appenda E,4 KD.3, that de aystan haw

• 0w capabibry to eenantially c<snplete the in1641 nutificauan of On pubhc,, within abnut 15 mmute" 1

(anphasse sumbed), a&iiuonal IIMA guidance rapilnns only thai Ow siren signal and LDS message be 1-scovsted (as tyneed w completed) *wnhin 15 mimnes" is in exmformity wah the NURISoro4 gedance.

b 11 LPZ boundanes are to be drewn to conform generally to pnhticaljurindwuaru rather own stricuy l

si a radius of ten miles imm the facibiy. See long Island (Jahung Co. (Shareham Nuclear Pomir Suuan, Unit 1), Clj $712,26 NRC Jt3,395 (1987).

g t

While a warmng systen should usure direct coverage of meenually 10&& of 0e pgelauan I

H wahin Sw niles of Ow site within fifteel minutes, then is same flulbility in terms d Ow pomninge of pop,lanan awwsgo that mast be obtained by the warning system for remou, now p<pulauan amas j

. l st a datance of more than five mila fram the facihty. NURin0634, Appendia 3. Cniana D.2b and ty see itMA Oundance Memorandum AN 1,"IIMA Actice to Quahfy Alen and Nouncation $ystana F

Against NURIO0654/IIMA.RFAl and IIMA RIA10* (Apr. 21,1987), Attee. I, at 1-2 to.3. his floalbihty, however, dass nat sanctim a warning systern whose design falls to povide an alen signal and an informatimalAnstructional message to more prpulated amas Otroughout the entire 174, includeg the Sw to non mue purunn, within fifteen minutes.

)l ALAB.936 PUBlJC $ERYlCE COMPANY Or Ntw IIAMPSIIIRE, et al (Subnd $tatim, Units 1 and s

j 2), Ikdat Nas. $4443 0L, 50-444 OL (Offstie Ernergewy lianning lasues), OPERA 11NG IJCENSE; 1

].

A he Amsel Based affirms ow Licenams Board's decision inIBP41,31 NRC 19 (1990), denying lt August 20,1990; DFfl510N i.

iniervenon' neuan to renpen the need and adadt a new conianuan relauw to ow adequacy of ths l

emstamcy broadcast system for the $mbrta facibiy.

B Las :( the three entwis set fonh in 10 CI A 42,734(a) for reaperung af os reced mist be inst before a reopening menan is granied.

1 C

If a scopening moum raises e contention not peviously in eenuowrsy, it must elao satisfy Ow y

d requinments for om admission d undmely contenuans ses farth in 10 CIA 6 2.714(O(l)(i)-(v).10 CJA

! [l

and clue insuucum to the regulace within the plume aposure pathway Lanergency Plaming 7 awn." 10 l 2.734(d).

I D

he Comminaian'a regulauons require that emergency aspense plans *pnwide early nnuncedan i

IM M d W ll @ N Nijj i E

for a fuum hrmnm are upaud w 'atabhah a syewn for d aseminating to

$?Mbb i

es,

a,r1sw in,.rmaem... -ms me a,mp,ats twenceem m app,n. stna as, i

meda, e s., Om Emergency Broadcast Systan (EBS)* NURISMWIIMA. RIAL (Rev.1),

• Criteria for Preparana and livaluade of Radiological 12nergency Response Plans and Parnednma in Suppet of m

Nuclear Power Planu" (Nav.1980), Cnierian D.L,5.

F Renart to an LDS is ans acognised method of pnwiding apprepnaw nouncation. An EDS l

~ [

custanarily is a naswmk of rs&o and Islevision staties voleuruy organized, in somedance with and f

subject to the naulanans of Ow Federal Commisucauana Canunission, to broadcast wnagency massem

)1

- to the pubhc in the event of an armagency. Ses 47 CIA $4 73.901. 962.

O he fact that a dwision is issued as an advisory opmian docs sus necessarily preclude nhance ai lu renaming.

i II It may be assumed 06at in the atmence of camps 1hng contrary evidence, no patticipant in a sute.

j estabhahed EB3 network win refuss to discharge iu communication fustion in a hmely mariner upon de occurnnce of a smuine onwrgency requiring puhuc nadnestim. $ee lag taland llahung Ca ($hnroham l

- h Nuclear Power Stauan, Unit I), ALAB-911,29 NRC 247,254-55 (1989).

Fw dis situanan in which there is a nonparucipatmg suw or local govunman,02 Cummisamn h

~

has mublehsd a 'kst efforts presumpnarLa Specincally,it assumes out thers will be *sma 'best effort

• f

'h-Sute and County response in de even of an accident,,, that.,, would unlize bhe udlity'al plan sa the best sous far emergency plaming informatim and options." Shmham, ClJ 8613,24 NRC 22,31

, f:

(19361 $a also 10 CIA 9 5a47(c)(1)(lic; Massachuseau e, United $utes,356 I;2d 378 (1st Or.1988).

[f

. p

e g

N 4

yy:

U i

s

,_u-_

---..,,--....a

i l

I f

I DIGl'STS ISSt ANCl3 OF 181F A10MIC $AtlTY AND IJCIMING Al'IT A1. ItOARDS r

J he sponsors of a revyenmg maiun have the burden of dammstratmg that the enuru f(r Ow grant of Ow tequested rshof have been $susfied. $ce Cleveland Doctric Illununstmg Co. (l'orty Nuctur hwer Plant, Unna l and 2), CLJ-&&7,23 NRC 233,235 (19%), aff'd sub ncan. Ohio v. NkC,814 L2d 258 (ts.h Car 1987), lauia,ana Pawer & Light Co. (Waterford Steam Denric Sutum, Urut 3), CtJh1,23 NRC 1, 3, aff'd sub ncan. Oystershall Athance v. NRC, $!Ki L2d 1201 (D C Ctr.1986)

K If a Board finds that a regimmg mcaum does not sodress a a,gnificant safety er ermamnumal usue,it need nas docune ehether Die mouon was umaly See 10 CIA i 2.734(a).

L.

A pany's claim of inas may nce mi enereJy upei dimichammera 39) prur Board fuhngt het, e.g., honhern Indiana Pubtw Serws Ca (Dallly Oeriorsung $tatum, Nuclear I), ALAB-224,8 AEC 244, 2 4 48 (1974). See also beabad, A1AB.748,18 NRC.1184 (1983); ALAB.749,18 NRC 1195 (1983),

ALAB-731.18 NRC 1313 (19t3)

A1All 937 PUDLJC $LRYlCl; COht!'ANY OF NEW llAbtP51tIRL, et at (Seabrae $tatim, Uniu 1 and

2) IMet Nus. M443 OI. 2440L (Offsite Imergerwy Planrung lasues); OPLRA71NO LJCI;NSL; I

Sepenhor it,1990; DECl310N A

The Appeal finani fmds that the lAsnsing liosrd erred in IJIP 89 32,30 NRC 375 (1989), by danusamg an intervenor contenuan concerning teacher abandonment of the ro!c assigned to Owen in the utihty4pmsured enwrgency respnse plart he A veel B(wrd reinands the issue to the licensing floard l

for an esplorsuon of Ow followmg (1) whether usare is reasonable sasurance that e sufficiers manher of i

teachers and day. cars persunnel will fulfill thatt assigned role, and (2)if not, are there sausfactory alternauve arrangernents for the fulfillment of that rule by others B

Unless the Commissum otherwue so directs, the Arpeal Itosed mry not suech *eny we.sht" to staternenu comained in immediam docuvenesa draermansuma. See 10 CIA I 2.764(g1 C

ne enunce of Ow reshen rule, as set fonh in 10 C.fik. I 50 47(c)(1)(iii), is the, in the evaluauan of the adequacy of a utihty.spawored emergency response plan, die NRC will remsnus On *reshty that in en actual emergmcy, stata and local gmarnment officiala orill esercue their best effons to praect the heMth and safesy d Ow pubhc.* lly reasm d this ruegnition, Ow secum declares Out "u may be presumed [6n the evolusum pmcess] that in the event d an actual radiological emerge >cy stsia and local officials would generally folkw pm utihty 14an."

D On om basis of its history, it canrat be emcluded that the rsaham rule eas imauled to trwar adool personnel such as the classmom teachers esported to serve es bus esems uruler a utihty sponsored g

M@M'% M' 4'd%g

• nngecy msnue Nan L

The Afteal Board may not properly rely an documans that have not been admiued into evidmco s

in the record at hand.

j It in terms die reaham rula apphes only to official actim once an octust emergenc3 has occurred and oms makes no assumpuans respectma pre-wnergmcy conduct AtAB-938 VLRMONT YANKill NUCLJAR l'OWIR COklORA110N (Venn(wu Yankee Nuclear Puwer

$tauon),Ibcam Na S271 OLA(5peniIvelPool Amendmmt) OIT. RATING 1JCLNSE AMENDMENT, Sepamber 21,1990; NCYTICE A

he Appeal Itoard duoets that ha previously unpubhahed request for clanfication innn uw Commissum be seponed in en NRC lasuances. In ALAB 919,30 NRC 29 (1989), the Agreat Board.

seversed e licensmg Bosni decunan that admitted an envimnmental contentim, and cerufied tu ruhng to Ow Commission. he Canmission respeded by romandmg the mauer for the Apwal Board's funher consideranon, prarnpurig the lioard to saalt clanficauon fawn the Comnuseum as to Ow preews issue it is to cmauler and the pmoalures it shmld follow.

i B

hr em sua of complaeness, previously ungibhahed issuances insy lawr be pubhahed in Om NRC 1

issuances. Ses, St., tmiaians Puour & light Co. (4 sterfml Steam Doctnc Suuon, Urut 3), AIAB 829, 23 NRC 55 (19fi6).

C The Naumal l>vironmental Ithey Act of 1%9 (NLPA),42 U.S.C. 4 4321, and the Sune of l'

reaam" by which NEPA la to be interpened do not require agencies to consider remote and speculauve i

evmts. ALAB 919,30 NRC 29,51 (1989).

D An Appeal Board may cornfy tu own decision to the Cernissim where it finds a defmitive ruhng ovuld be in the pibhc interest Id at 35,39.

7

_~...-

9 L

b i

DIGl'.STS IMUANCl.h OF Till: ATOMIC EAllTY AND LJCIMING APrF Al 1404kl 5 L

• (Wlhere e emtaum is based se a factual undequning in a dwunwrs 0,at has been saansially l

nyudated by the enuru of that documers, Die tentenum eney be denussed imlens the ime:vaut affers anaha indeptedera emm** I%he Servu Co. of New llampahue (Sestrae $ution, Uniu I and 2),

QJ.89 3,29 NkC 2M,241 (I?89).

F W Cannmusian's Ri,les of Piscta tudtnarily alkw the suplerramauan of 4tutenture end Owne i

tese cutly upm e balanctng af Os five facuns in 10 CIA $1714(aK11 See 10 C.I'A 01714(b)

O While reading on Snenu"of a caumunn at the 64minamn stage formerly was pnAhted,llauswa lis$ains and l\\wer Co. (Alters Cred Nuclear Omersung Suunn, Umi l), ALAll 590,11 NRC 542, $47 49 (1950), the Commissum twenuled pus preceden by amendmg Die Rules of Practice to aquire that 1

canientions he news specific and sunwnted wuh sufficusa envmantation to shew Gist a genuaw 6asue of matsnal law or fact maints, $4 Ied Reg 33,168, 33,170, 33,180, 33,181 (1919) (cudtfied at 10 C.I' A

}

l1714(h)(2),(dX2)(1990).

il N ruim 6& pied in Sepanher 1989 (t e,i10 C.I A i1784(b)(2),(dX7))that seqmre omtanuww to be ante sprofic and sow <sted wuh sufficies dwumeitauan are pwrecuvo only.

4 ALAll 939 PUDlJC $r.RYlCL COMPANY Or N1'W llAMPSIURE, et al. (Seabrae $6ation, Uniis I and h

2), thicist Nua $444101. 34444 0L (Offaite lenarsawy Manning leaves), OPl.ldTING IJCI.NSE; E

Sepsenhor 28,1990; hithK)RANDUM AND OM)r.R RLOARIXNO k,lRRRED QUl5!10N5 lj A

W Ameal Itaard respnds to quentians refamd by the IJcoums llaard in IJtPW12,31 NRC 427 (1990), oncerning the adequacy of shaltenna ptwemru in the New llampahue RadudogicallJnagery Reaparse l' tan (Ntikt.RP).

D When a pony gworedy has been disnussed In=n a poruun of the proceeding by om LJcensing h;

I.oerd, Ow Aneal lioard will run emaient niet pany's sutseques suhrninsus that falstes duectly to de j

j paruun of Gie proceahng Innn which it was d$wn:ssed.

As kms as an einergery respwwe i an exwaains shehenna as a posanual enwrgeicy mpmas d

H C

gitirsi, on 3 an mun etwaam duectuwe as to how to carry out sudi en qwm, even if est opian is an 4

unhkaly era D

N fullowing nedvucal issue is discussed; lanergawy Plans-1,w.mw n w,ie0m m II N

I I

?

ni ii i

18 It 9

r I

i i

l i

I DIGESTS ISSUANCl3 OF Tilt ATOMIC EMTTY AND IT'l:NSINO liOARDS ISP MD CURATOR $ OF Dit UNIVIR$fiY OF M1350t'R!, tkdot Nus. 400270,3402278 M1A l

(A3tBP Na 90613424(IA)(TRUMP $ Project)(Dyproduct Ucerme Na 2440513 32, $ paul Leclear Maienals LAense No. $NM 247), MATIA1AlJ UCENSL AMlWDMINfi July 9,1990, MLMORAN-DUM AND ORDLR Ontervenars' M(em far throned Cerufwatum)

A ha Priet&ng Ofker darues intervenors' mnuun for dirwtad ceruficauan because they failed to show a pnma facw case that these were special emtenstances requiring the waiving of the prucedural regulatim,10 C.FA 9 2.12050), that permns b $taff in nasue licews dunna the pendency of special rnaierwis ca es.

D Intervenors have de burden of proof to establish a pnma faese case that these are special cucumstances justifying a waiver of a Commissim regulauan. hey canma carry their burden through mere annenim, wuhout accompanying affidavita C

An alleged naht to a pnar beanng &es hat, by itself, provide gnxinds for an sacepuim to ar waivet j

ef 10 C.FA (2.12050), whuh permits the Staff of the Cummissim to issue bcenas ammenents during Ow pendency of a proceedug hirthermars, dere is no regulaum requinns the Suff to issue "psmiuve 1

fmdtngs" as a prerequisite to issuing en ameruimmt. Dese must, therefore, bc en evidenuary showing of i

why it is inagrupnais in a parucular case Get the $taff take on auduwued scoun before en encerumi or waiver mighi be granted.

I IJIP 9024 IWRIDA 70W13 AND UGITT COMPANY (Turkey Ptant Nuclear Genersung Piant, Units 3 and 4),lhdet Nos. M2540tA.$, $42510tA 5 (AstBP Na 90602410tA 5)(fechmcal Specifica-unns Replacernes)(T scility Operating Lkenne Nos DPR.31. DPR-41), OPERAUNO UCENSE AMEND-MINTL July ll,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDLA (Maim to thamias)

A he Board demisses the sale Iraarvens as a psny based on changed cucumstances. Stan&ng (w l

gg,g 8 St%h$ M4dfl the Intervenar was bened is, one mornhet, who was employed within the rane of interest of de plant, but l

who was &snussed frain his jnb. Given the pnar history of the case, in which the sale interveruw already r-had the oppottunity to show that it had bases for standmg ad&umal to that of this one member, Ow Bastd

{

ed act afford any funhar opporturuty to show new bases far stan&ng. The dwtaion was without prejudice g

to a mouan to reopen should the member demonstrais in his pmeng Depenmet of Lahar action in whuh that Aplicant was responsible for tus wrungful dacharge frorn employme:S D

When an orgsrurauon suffers a diange of cucumstances aus that its stanang is affected, or&narily it nuy demmstrate an alternative ground for stan&ng llowever, when the orgsmuuan alre.ady had the cypurtunity to dernestrats an thernative gmund fur standmg and failed to do so, it will not be afforded a accmd cyporturuty. (this tule may nra apply, however, to pas later stages of a procesang aftst utensive w

l htigade has already occurred.)

g C

When die only parncipsung intervenor is disnussed, o Bosed may retain juna&ciian to determine i

whether or not to eneruse its authority to make ens or more of the pending cmendme a sua sponte issue because it is an issue important to safety or the envirminent.10 C.F.R. 4 2.760s. li may uk for a brief on the issue from the remauung parues.

1.DP 90 25 CLnT.tAND 1214TRIC ILLUMINA11NO COMPANY. et at (Perry Nuclear Power Ptant, Unit 1), Ikdes Na 544440tA 2 (AstEP No. 9460kO2 0LA). OPLRA11NO UCMSE AMENDMI'ATt i

July 23,1990' MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Staff's and Ikause's Mauons far Ramsider-sum) 9 l

l tb t

i i

i DIGESTS 4

IS$UANCLS OF Till: ATOMIC gAWTY AND l.lCl:NSING ltOARD$

j "r

A his Menorandum and Order derues mouons for recms derauon fded by licensee and Staff of 13n 9415. 31 NRC M1. WIP 9415 revwwed a peuum to interva e and contenuun fded in respmse to a notice inacaung that Ucame had apphed far an ammenmi to tu wiersting hemas that wtadd delete cyslw spaific parameter hmits and other cycle-spectfic fuelinformanan frun the Perry Tedinical Speci6caums j

and subsutute a prtmaim allowing [Jcensee to ses these hrruu in accord with NRC-spproved enethodology.

The cruenum raised an argummt that grant of the amenenent wdl utilawfully deprive Peuuoner af lu L

heanns rights unde l 189a of the Atanic !)ergy Act in the Memorandum and Order, ths Itoard affirmed its huiding that if om hcense amenenent vesied any substanual discreum in licensee in determining the cycle-specific parameter luniu, is might well desmve Petiuuner of heenns t ghts conferred by l 189 of the l

[,

Atonuc laergy Act De Ilusrd admitted the Peutinner and its contenum in onter to affcrd I%titumer ths

(

l gycrtunity to confront Staff's factual argument that the amendment wuuld not have this e!!act il Secuan 50.36 of M Commissum's regulatsaru requires that po*er reactor Tahnical Specificaums

[

must include tnose matters es to whidi the impaition of ngid condinans or hmitations is naissary to

[

obvisie the possibihty of an atmormal situsunn or event gmns nas to en immediate otrret to the pubhc g

health and safety. Cycleapectne parameter hmits are such mauers. The Canuninsum may not aberate its p,

respmsibility to review and orpnwe beaue ameruiment amhcaums that raise such matters by granung hceruns substanual ducretion in determining them.

c 1

C An interestnd manber of the pibhc is entitled to an omartunity for hearing on an apphastian fue I

en amemiment to e power reactor hemne.

3 j

IJtP 9426 ALL CllD.llCAl,15CyTOPli FNRICllMINT, INC., Docket Nos. 54603,546M (AStJIP No.

i g

1 89-5401 OM/SC)(Cunstructim Fermit Nos CPL P 1 and CPLP 2); CX)N5'!1tUCIlON PI RMTT MODI-1 S.

I1 CATION AND $1lOW CAUSE; July 24,1990, MrMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruhng on NRC $taff

/

P Mcaion im Summary Dupnsttion and Duimissal of Prmeeng) f 4

A Secuan 186(a) of the Atomic 1.nergy Act, as amended makes beennes for nuclear facihues y

subject to revocation for put hcerums fattures if the prai hemsing cm&tians would have warranted s

the Canmissnm to refuse to grant a hcense on an ensinal appucanon, the hcense can be revoked, p

B

$setsun 2.749 of 10 CJ.it permtu sununary espostuon to be used in dactdo the ultimais issue in all types of procee&ngs oncept in the case of the issuance of consuucnon pernuis far e production facihty.

h Wre, sumanary dupusinan ady may be used for the determmauun of sperinc subonhnsie issues but nas l.*%eltlicidt9',E WK$@#1'idMW D

to daarmine the alumais laaue as to whaher the pamti shall be issued.

t H

IllP 9427 CURATURS OF Ti!E UNIVERStrY OF MIS $OUR!, Ducket Nas 7400270, 3402278.MLA 1-(ASUIP No. 9461342 MLA)(11tUMP.S Project)(liyproduct ucense Na 24 00513 32, $pecul Nuclaar g

U Maienals Ucense Na $NM-2d7), MAT 1. RIAL 3 UCIWSE AMENDMINT; July 50,1994 MEMORAN-

[

DUM AND ORDER (Completeness of the lleanns Fde)

A The presidmg c(6cer issued an onter requinns the Staff of the Nuclear kegulamry Commission I

to cumply with the guulance iniuauy issued in LAP.9422 and to aunplete the haanns fue by inclueng in

[

it all repons and documents that liuervenors might ressanably consider relevant to their sanitted areas of I

cmcern l

Il N presidmg officer is responstble for daarmirung the smtcet of the haanns fde. De Suff nuy

• ~

[

nnt refuse to be a paity, thereby permitt.ng decisions to be made cmcermns the concerns to be admitted, and tha. refuse to stanplete the hearing (de with respect to thme corwrns.

g 4

C The presan of a document in the pubhc documait rown in Weahingte, D C., does not excuse L

its bemg served m the perues when there is no hwal pubbc document rumn y[

D Section 30.32(iXI) of 10 CJ.R. appears to require that arphcatin s to possess rs&oactive masenals in unsealed form skadd demonsuite that the matimum dose to a person off site will he no more than i o

rom effective dose equivalent <r 5 rerns to the thyroid or should contain an emergency plan for respmdmg d.

to a releans ci radioscuve materials, his secum does not seem relevant to whethe an agphcatim must l

dernmstrate that h maienals bams used will r.at be durerned by fire or explosim.

j IRP 9425 RollEKT L DICKIIERBER, Docket Na 55-54tLSC (AstSP No. 94614015C) (EA 94WI) l h --

(Senior Operetor Ocesse limited to IW1 Itandling. No 50P@65-8), and COMMONWEALT11 EDISON l

COMPANY (Quad Ciues Nuclear Ibuer Staum), Ibcket Nos. 54254.OM, 54265-OM (ASIRP No.

j 94 609 02-OM) (LA 94032) (Facuity Operstmg Licmae Nos. DPR-29 and DPR 30); ENIORCEMINT;

^},

i p

l l

t' e

-. -- - -. ~. - _ - - -

+

,y l

J

_. _..... _... ~ _, _. -

d.

1 Il!Gl:STS 1%SU ANCl3 Ol' Till: ATOMIC S AITTY AND 1.lCf'NhlNO it0ARDS i

August 1.1990; MLMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Awawing $sttlement Agroansit and Ternunstmg Pro mimg4 A

he 1 kenning fluard anmwm a Selenent Agreemers betwem the parues and terminates two enfurcanml prureedmas.

B Where e Nouw of lisaririg has been lasued. s Ikensing Daard is authurued to omrtwo terminsuun of an enforcement pnmedmg a the basu of a settlement agreanent *acsarang due owght to the prsidan of Ow staff." 10 Cf.R. I2.203.

l j

LEP.9029 OliOROLA po%T.R COMPANY, et at (Vogtle IPetrie Generatir: Phara Units 1 and 2), Ikxhet i

Nos. $0 42401A,50 425.OIA (A$thP No. 90417 0).0LA)(licihty Operstmg thenne Nm. NPF48 and NPF.81); OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMINT; August 16,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORD12

(

(Intervention Ituin)

J A

la a puceedag involving a prgosed amendment to an operating licenas leescal specification, the Ikening Bosni considers the adnussitahty of a peuum fur irderwentim, estabhshes Almg dates for further suhnussions, and seedules a preheanng conferawe to consider Ons quesuun.

8 H

Under goverrung rules, to be admiued to a proceedmg, a puential imervenor must demonstate that It has standmg to participsia 6nd must poffer at least are accqtable contention. Cantantions need na appear in the tmervendan peuuan tuAlf but, rather, are to he set fonh in a supplement filed not later than 15 days hafare de first puheartng cafersna C

A paentialimervennt may ameid lu imervenuan paiuon without lure of the Doerd wull 15 days prior to the fist preheering conferenn.10 CIA 12.714(a)(3).

D A peuunner for imarvenuon in an NRC paceadmg may not bass au standmg en esference to its parucipatie in other paceedings, beh NRC and otherwise E

To establah standmg to parucipate in a paniculas proceed $ng, e peuthmer snusi show that the subject matter of the paceadmg will cause " injury in fact" and that the injury is arguably within 0,e " sone cf Interans" prutected by es Atomic l't. orgy Act of 1954, u amended, or the National I.nvinstmental Policy Act, a smanded.

l' Wher, a petiuonar for intervention is a group er organization, it rney establish sunding either through iis own organlaumal interats or through the interests of its members. In past reactnr licensms or l

license-amendment proceedmas, residence or employment of a petinaner within 50 miles of a facihty has been sufficias to dernansusie that a pennianet's interwt may be affeasd by de puceedmg.

O If represenung the interests of one of lu members, a group inust domestrate by afndevit of dist awmher that it is authorized to serrman put nurnber, ha group must also demonstrtte that it has

-' MMyNgg$

authanzad the represenative appeanng on tu brM1f to represent us group's irnerest.

,U M,T (RPM 30 CURA'IVRS OP T1tE UNIVER$!TY OF M15SOURI,Ikchet Nos. 70500270, 3402275.MLA (A5UIP Na 90613 02-MLA) (Re: TRUMP.$ Project)(Dyproduct (kenne Na 24 00513 32; $pecial 1

Nuclear Materials Ucmise No. SNM 247); MA11:RIA1,5 UCENSE AMENDMINr; August 24, 1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Temponry Suy Request)

A he presiding officer in this Sut ert L poceedmg denied a natuest for a temporary suy of t

Ucenses's planned empenmems with nepturdum and plutonium, lie uid that he undersual why the docummus available in Imervenars has caused them concern amaut the safay of die planned md. Iloweva, 4

[

after seviewing the detailed sectmical response fded by Ucermee, the paiding officer was satisfied that none el the grounds for a suy existed and he denied the suy.

B Pursuant to 10 CIA (11263, the paidma officer may issue a atsy in sospanse to Imervawn' motion far a suy, whid they included with their sequest for a has.nng. In this cue, the posidang offcar 3

j had delstred scuan en the suy motion included with the requesL llence the terms of section 2.1263 rster i

to 10 CIA 11788 far the standants governing the granting of a suy c( the Staff's heensing action.

Under that sectim, the criteria for determining whetner or not to grant a suy are set fonh in subsecum (s).

j '

Additionally, subsection (g) permits a temparsry stay in entraordmary cases, even without waiting for the fdmg of any answer. In Otis instance, the posidmg of5cer was able to await an oral answer and a wntte aruwer fran Ucensee before actmg an the motion far s temponry stay.

C

. Applimuana for special materials licenses and bypmduct materials licames must demonstrate that they are adequate to pmiect health and minimize danger to life or propony pursuant to 10 CIA il 30J3(sX2) and 70.Zl(s)(31 Dey must also canply with 10 Cf.R. l 20.106, whicti limits the eatent to :

j 11 i

5 i

I

,4

=

,. ~ -, - _, -

l

- m m

-~

I l

DIGESTS i

15sOANCl3 OF TilC ATOMIC 5 AITTY AND 1.lCI:NstNO lio Ak!>$

' i ohich LAeruse vnay release nephatium or plutmiurn into the air a ester in sacess of natural bacignvund radiatiart D

1hwe regulations are irserpreted in Regulatory Ouide 10.3, whidi requues e detaDed desenpuon d the eqsupment, facilities, and trutrumentation, and - for chernical es peysical processing cgwrsuors -

e desengen of contmis fu fire prevaunon.

L 1hs foupwing technical issues are &acussed. ILLPA fdtsrs, DC)P tesung d ill;PA fdiers, Okive Ima desigm Plutmiurn, handhng of, Ngtunnen, handling of.

Lim 9631 1U13A GAMMA RAY,INC.,Ikuist Na 3412319CivP (ASUIP Na 9461 t@<ivP)(LA 89 4

223) (Maiorial limnas No. 35 17175 01); IMORCEMENT; August 29,1990; NOhCE Or llEAR!NO

~

AND(yTitLR MATTuts i

1.im9a 32 III)RIDA POW 1.k AND IJOlff COMPANY (Turkey Ptant Nuclear Generaung Plant, Units 3 and 4 this Nos. SO2 SOL.A 5, S251 OLA-5 (ASLDP Na 9460241,OIA-5) (Inchnical Specince-tims Heplacerners)(twility Operaitng linnae Noa DPR.31, Dilt41), OitRATINO UCENSE AM12 M}Nr; Sepernber 25,1990; Ml:MORANDUM AND ORDER (Cmaideratie of lbsaille Sua sponte is.

{

sues) i A

The licenaang Itoard deaded that it has the autlanty to declare a sua sponte issue even ther j

g; the interverur has bem Asnussed as a pany. Ilowever, is doculed to refer its concerna to the Advisory p.1 Corremtuo m itenciar $afegusrds and to Aarnisa this case becaum the grounds for a sua sparus issue do rj act eatst p

D If a licensing Itoard, in the course of its duties, discovers an impursant safety or anytnavnental l

issue,it must declare a sua sponte issus, pursuaru to 10 Cf.IL $ 2,Me, whether er not there us perues i

intemied in that issus er remaining in the casa.1he sua spmie authonty is an added protectuvi for the public intervet that the Based exercues an its own authonty.

6 C

The fouowing induucalinsum are Ascussed: Standard Tectriical $pecificat.ons; Change in Made h

Reduction Requirensra, Teduucal Specincations; Dorstim, loss of Abihty to Reduce Males; losa of Coolant Imp; ADowed Outage Time, I.rrors in No signincant lluards Repon, Stani6cance of F

W;?iiiut!NG$1%

b," M M 'I y

h a

L L,,

I hIi I,

h I

i i

4' 12 l

n 9'

l l

- _ ~ _ _ _ _

I 1

l.

1sSUANCl3 OF DIRI:CTORS' Di Cisl0NS DIGl',STS

(

I DD 904 PUllLIC $tRVICL COMPANY OF NEW llAMPhillRE, et al. (subn=4 Staum, Units 1 and 2), lhdet No $0443, RFQULST FOR ACrlON, July 9,1990, D!RtfRT$ DI:C1510N UNDLR 10 CJ.R. I1206 A

The threnue, Office of Nuclear Reactor RegWauen, demes a hutim fded by htncia herte.

briklund rmluesung demal of a licerse to operate Seabnm4 Nuclear $taum. As grounds for Om request, em Peuuuner had asserted that emne of the safety issues raised in e July 11, 1989 lener to the NRC's Advtsory Canmitue on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) fram the Board of Selectmen of the Town of 1.saca, Menschusetu, had bem resolved. In denying the I460an, Ow Director fmnd that, smtrary to the Ptatunner's ancrunn, all of the allegnuans raised by the Ptuumer had been addreued in the Mnal 1.nvironmental

$tatemmt for Ow Seabnek facihty, and in a memorandum fran uw $taff to dw ACR$ subcanmittee.

11 Evacuauon deciaians as made by staie and local smernmenta, not Ow NRC.

C The followtng nedmical issues are discuned: Release of radioactive natenals in effluents to unrestricted areas; bas ofeolant accidents; nicane of radmactive snatenals to gnamdwater, emergency planning and evacuauan.

DD 945 PUBLIC $0RVICE COMPANY OF hTW llAMPSillRl', et al. (Saabnxa $tsiion Umt 1), thdoi No 50443, REQUEST IOR ACf10N, August 31,1990; DIRECTOR'S DI C1510N UNDER 10 C.F.R.

( 2.3E A

in an linergency Mouan filed bduie un Cummiasmn on behalf of New England Coalium on Nuclear Polluuon, $cacuast Anu Pulluuan Ingue, and ou Cunnumweahh of Mamachusetts 0%uunnen) in the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Conwntasiun's (NRC's) hcenams pruceedtrgt for Ow Seahmra stauon, Unit 1, Peuuoners alleged the eustance of necent, previously undisclosed indunty nports of estensive and senous 157 hacuMP arwe at Seabrua. halumers argued that these materials (certain reputs prepared by (4MIMbibP, h

R8

%1llI@$1!hMbilSoy On Insutute for Nuclear Power Operations (lNIV)) demonstrated that the NRC had no vihd technical beam

(

for Ending that Seabrme Statim Unit I of Ow Pubhc Service Company of Nee llampehus, et al- (thenace) l cornpbed with Om NRC's ngulanons and was safe to operna i

B The Matic was nferied to the Duumor of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulaum (NRR) far pretwradon of a sessmae pursuant to 10 C.F.R. I 2.34 C

The Ihrutor of NRR has reviewed the INIO reporu mferred to by 1%iiumers and has found the i

alleganons not to be sutstanuated. he INIV repms en which the allegations were founded do not lndicate that Ow SeahnmA facihty is out of cmformance with NRC tequirements or that it is unsafe to agerate.

The 1.icensee's corresdve actions were appornate and respwsive to the LNPO Gruhngs. Cmsequm0y, ow IAro. tor of NRR determined that no acuan pursuant to sectim 1206 reed be taken in 0,w matter.

Dt1946 Cl1 VEL.AND EtJfikiC ILLUMINA11NO COMPANY, et al. 0%rry Nuclear hnmr Mant Unit 1), lhdet N,. 50440, Rf! QUEST FOR AC110N, September 25,1990, DIRift'OR'S DECislON UNDLR 10 Cf.R. 4 2.206 A

he thrector of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatim denies a paium 61ed by Ohio Ciusens for Reapmaible Energy,Inc. 0%uunners), that requested the Nuclear kegulatory Commissim (NRC) order the shutdown of em 5%rry Nuclear hwer Plant, Umt 1 (Peny) and issue a Nunce of %olation and impose s civil pmahy on Cleveland Liectnc fliununsung Canpany (Licensee), he peutim alleged that Ow lleensee j

had operated in violaum of tu Technical Spaincanona since Nowmher 1989. In daytng the raiuest, 1

15

.'m

.--....n.~

tu o

DIG l'.STS L%UANCE:A OF DIRirIOR$' t>0CIAIONS L

the Directs Nnd ht N Licensee had not gerated Perry in a manner contrary to e.at pesnuttat by its merstmg twerut

.i it The following technwal Larue is duicuued: Laanntial Servwe Water Systern.

!F J

I i

I

<0 t

i p

i i{.

. '{

t ik

.ti i

fa 1

/f p

t g

2 0

f r

a L

i:

e b

i

[

I; idpNiii:k.W94i!P,4ip U'(

h'#

'? M b b "b l

l l

i:

i

~

l

. _-)

1 4c, 11 h1 '

ll f h, t

n I h.- r I

f l

1

-H b

!j

(

14 n

H.

I i

l i

t e

l' I

t i

1, i

l l

\\

r i

L f8 i

fn LI: GAL CITATIONS INDEX CA$l.S bl t

f r

j Cmcinnati das and Dectnc Co, (Willmn 11. Lmmer Nuclear Power Suuon, Unit I), Cll-82 20,16 NRC i

i 109, 110 (1982) l l

criteria for admission as a sus sparse issug UIP 9032, 32 NRC 183 (1990) sua spnte a,kydon of issues that have already been slutlighted for cunelersuon by staff, I

IEP.B24,32 NRC 18 (1990)

Oties of Statesville v. AEC,441 F.2d 962, 974 (1969) put licensirg review and revocauon of bcenses fur pot hcerums fadures; ISPMM,32 NRC 37 (1990) l Ceveland Doctric illuminstmg Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Uruts I and 2), CUh7, 23 NRC 233,

/

235 (191L6), affd sub norn. Ohio v. NRC,814 F.2d 258 (6th Or.1957)

W

'a burden on spoors of revyning motion; ALAB-936,32 NRC 82 etl8 (1990) j Consolidated Eduan Co. of New Yath (Indian Point, Units I, 2 and 3), CU 75-8, 2 NRC 173,176 f

(1975)

+

standard far truutution of 2.206 proceedings; DD-905,32 NRC ;28 (1990) 7

/

k Consumere Power Co. (Md;and Mant, Unita 1 and 2), ALAB491,16 NRC 897,907 (1982),

review acchned,17 NRC 69 (1983) sua spmte E

P H

dismissal of appeal of intervonor far failure to perucipate before the hcensing board), AIAD 934, 32

[

[

-fi, NRC 4 (1990)

!f Duke Pown Co. (Catawba Nucle. Station Units 1 and 2), Cll 8319,17 NRC 1041 (1983) five factor test for admission of lawfaled cetenuans; AIAll 937, 32 NRC 147 n40 (1990)

'.a Fmal Rule on Frnergency Planrdrs. C118MO,12 NRC 636,638 (1980)

"I

~

l i

reason for 5. to 10 mile range for alertma system; AIAD-935,32 NRC 72 rL55 (1990) gg#90 florida Power and Ught Co (St. Lucie Nuclear Powa Plant, Units 1 and 2), Clj 89 21,30 NRC 325, $

lDN9,' MOD, 329 (1989)

[

showing raessary to estabitsh standmg to intervene in license amendment proceedmg; LEP 90L29,32 l

NRC 91 (1990) g.

i h herre UtiLUes Authonty of Qiy of FL herre s. United States, 606 F.2d 986,996 (1979), cat.

r

[

den,ed, 444 U,5. 862

{

post heensiry revre and revocation of licenses for post-hcensing failures; UIP#26,32 NRC 37

j

).

(1990)

. j-Georgis Power Co. (Vogtle ucctric Ocnerating Plant, Uru!s 1 and 2), AIAIF851,24 NRC 529,53031 i

(1986) tbsnussal of smeal of imervenor for failure to parucipate before the licensing board); AIAD-934,32 l,

L

-l NRC 4 (1990) i 1

Ocorgia Power Co. (Vogtle Doctnc Generating Plant, Uniu I and 2), AIAB-859,25 NRC 23,27 (1987) l jurisdic6m over an issue being appealed, IEPM32,32 NRC 184 (1990)

I Ocorgia Power Co (Vogtle Dectric Gmersung Plant, Units I and 2), AIAD-872, 26 NRC 127,131 (1987) adequacy of brief as basis far accepung or rejecung appeals; ALAB-937,32 NRC 153 rtS9 (1990)

Georgia Power Co. (Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Uruts I and 2), UtP 84-35,20 NRC 887,916 (1984) i standuss to inservene on basu of participsuan in other proceedman,1.1tP.90 29,32 NRC 91 (1990) 15 I

1

~.. -

1

l 1

4~

. -., ~.

)

LI: GAL CITATIONS INDI X Cuis llousum laghtmg and Nwer Ca (Allau Creek Nutcar Ocnerstma Statim, Umi 11, ALAB 590,11 NRC 542, 547 49 (1980) l menu deserrmnatmns of somenuans at admanian stage ALAB-938,32 NRC ifd n.5 OMO) thmnon IJahtirg and Neer Ca (South Teaas lwiect Umts I and 2), A1AB 549,9 NRC M4,647 (1979) asimrsuonal standmg to intervene, beats far, IJiP 90 29,32 NRC 92 (1990) l i

l Iknutan IJahting and Power Ca (South Teams Prnfect, Umts I and 2), LJIP 79 ' _,9 WRC 439 M3 M

' -l (1979), affd, A1AB 549,9 NRC M4 (1979) basa for standtng u, intervene in hccrue ammutmmi potmtmg. IJIP.9429,32 NRC 92 (1990) 3 lag taland LJghung Ca (Shareham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 1), A1AB-900,28 NRC 715,290, i

a.

+i -

review dechned, ClJ 8811,28 NRC 603 (1988) tirr>g requirernent for warmns sysierra, ALAll 935,32 NRC 70 (19W) k, y.j leg taland lighung Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Neer Statmn, Urdt 1), AIAB-911,29 NRC 247 (1989) i n

esistence of suu IJIS as resumptive of adequaw cmerige for energmey nauticatim purpmes, I. i:

A1AB 936,32 NRC $1 (1990)

'j.

Iag taland IJgburg Ca (shareham Nuclear bu $tauon, Urut 1), Clj 86-13,24 NRC 22 (1986) crista of rulam rule, A1AD 937,32 NRC 149 (1990) las Island lJahting Ca (shareham Nuclear Powa Sution, Unit 1), Clj 8613,24 NRC 22,31 (1986) l l"

assumptim of best#funs respmse by stata and laal governments in an energency; ALAIF936,32 4-NRC 82 n.17 (1990) f img Island tJghtmg Co (Shareharn Nuclear Power Stenar, "it I), Ctj 87 5, 25 NRC 864, 888 (1987) i weight give to evergency respmse tumrnitment of &,can Red Crusa; AIAtt 937,32 NRC 142 j

(i990) lag Island Idahung Ca (shareham Nuclear Po*er Suuan, Urut 1), CtJ 89-2,29 NRC 218 (1989) manchon of dismusal for emnparncipane en romanded lasues; ALAB 934,32 NRC 5 (1990) taisiana Nwer and IJaht Ca (Waterfont Sicam Doctric Sunon, Urut 3), ClJ-86-1,23 NRC 1, $, aff'd aub nom. Oystershell Alhance v. NRC, 800 F.2d 1201 (D C, Cir,1986)

I(

tmrden on armsors of ravning mocon; ALAB-936,32 NRC 82 n18 (1990) t Masachusetts v. Uruted staies, 856 E2d 378,383 (1st Ctr.1988)

{;

apphcabihty of realam rule to school personnel, AIAB 937,32 NRC 150 (1990)

MetrTotaan 1.dann Ca (Itree Mile taland Nuclear Suum, Umt 1), C1J.79 8,10 NRC 141,147-48 lW,'li%iFjndMibd j! i (1979e Y

W, t

I suff obhgadan to serve e pany or asubhah a local pahhc document nom, IJ1P 9427,32 NRC 42 0 990) 0 Northem Indiana Pubhc Service Ca (Bailly Omeasung Station, Nuclear 1), A1AB.224, 8 AFC 2M, 246 48 (1974) h clums of duenchantment with pnar twensing tuard ruhngs as bas,s for claims of bias, A1AB 936, a

32 NRC 43 n.24 (1990)

I Northem :nd ana Public Service Ca (Bailly Generating Sunan, Nucle.ar 1), AI AB-2M, 8 Alf 244,251 h

(1974) h dumasal of appeal of intervenor for failure to par 6cipate tefore the hecrutng tmord), A1AB-934,32

[

NRC 4 (1990) 1-Northem Sutes Power Ca (Pratta faland Nuclear Ocneranns Plant, Uniu I and 2), A!All-288,2 NRC 1

390, 393 (1975) dlI forfeiture by intervenor of enutlanent to yny status on parucular issue because of failure to

[

b perucipaic on ren,and, ALAB-934,32 NRC 4 a 14 (1990)

![!

Pacific Osa and Dectric Ca (thablo Canym Nuclear Nwer Plant, Uniu I and 2), AIAB.583,11 NRC M7,448 (1980) b b

appeal nghts of intarvenors who fail to parucipue on licensing issues beisig appealed; A1AB.934,32 0

NRC 4 n.13 (1990)

Nner C(unty Chapter of the Isaak Wahon 1.cague v. AEC, 533 F.2d 1011 (7th Ctr.), cert demed, 429 U.S 415 (1976) h sunderd for consideration of class 9 accidenu DD 90-4,32 NRC 51 rol (1990)

N v

I 16 i

I b

s'

-. - -.-_~ -- - - - - _._ ~ ~

- - -. ~ ~ ~.~----.- - _. _ _. =.

~..-n..

,y

- - -.,.. _ -.~--

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES t

Purtland Geneal Decvic Ca (Pebble Spnnes Nucht Plant, Uniu 1 and 2), CUN27,4 NRC 610. 611 614 17 (1976) tot for decretionary interventim by an asanizatian; lEPM24,32 NRC 15 (1990)

Ponland Oenaral Doctric Co. (Trojan Nuckr Plant). AIAB 331,9 NRC 263. 27114 (1979) interpretanan of manors that inust be included in technical speefutions; LBPM2$ 32 NRC 23 d:,,

(1990)

Puh Service Co of Indiana (Marble Ilill Nuclear Omuroung $tation, Uniu I and 2), !JP437. 24 NRC 719 (1986) beard brindiction pnor to issuance Nadce d thang: LBPM32,32 NRC 184 (1990)

Pubbe Sar= ice Ca of New flamphire (Subnx4 Station, Uniu I and 2), ALAB 748,18 NRC 1884

{+'

0913): ALAB.749,18 NRC lit $ (1983); A1AB 731,18 NRC 1313 (1983)

(

f tlains of dasschansment with prim hcensing bossd suhny as basis for claims d bias; ALAB.936, 32 NRC 83 a.34 (1990)-

J Pubbe Savias Ca of New Ilampshire (Seabnx4 $:anan, Uniu 1 and 2), CU 89-3,29 NRC 234,241 (1989)

I dannseal of caniention based a factual underpmrdng that has lean essentially repuduiad by the soun= of that docurnant; ALAB438,32 NRC 162 (1990)

Puh Sevice Ca of Oklahoma (Black Fan Siation, Uniu I and 2). A1AB-397 $ NRC 1143,1145 i

(1977)

}

3 test for decruianary intervennan by an organis4;lan; LEPM24,32 NRC l$ (1990)

Rockws!! Iniemance 1 Corp. (Rockadyne thvision), AIAB 925,30 NRC 709 (1989), affd, CUM 5,31 NRC 337 (1990) t{

. board knadicuan paar to Lesuance of Notice d lleanns. LEPM32,12 NRC 184 (1990) entharity of preading aficer to canpleu the hearing recad; 1EPW27. 32 NRC 42 a.1 (1990)

Sierre Club v. NRC, 862 P.2d 222 (9th Cir.1989), as amended motim for seconsideratian of environmanal catendon: AIAB 938,32 NRC 159 (1990)

Tennessee VaBey Authority (Wins Bar Nucht Plant Urdts I and 2), ALAB 413. 5 NRC 1418,1421 nd l

0 977) basis for sunding to intervene in license smaximant proceedms: LEPM29,32 NRC 92 (1990).

3 Tennessee Valley Authnniy (Watts Bar Nuclear P! ant Unlu 1 and 2). ALAB413. 5 NRC 1418,1422 i

(1977)

I test for decronanary iniarvenuun 1,y an orgariitanon; 1. BPM 24,32 NRC 15 (1990)

Mt@@l$ilNibn

' Texas Unlities Generanns Co. (Comanche Peak Summ PJactric Station, Uniu I and 2), CU-8136,14 ja,Wedgh{;Qi NRC till, 1114 (1981) y effect of a pony's withdrawat m h6sauan of ha contendans; UIP 9432,32 NRC 183 (1990) g tat for desernnning whether to adopt dismies-d intewner's contenties sua spania; ISP 9424, 32 i

i NRC 14 (1990)

{

Viramia Destric and Power Co. (Nath Anna Power station, Uniu ! and 2), A1AB 363,4 NRC 631 0 976) f test for decretionary intervention by an cigantration; IEPM24,32 NRC 15 (199Q Yirginia Doctric and Power Co, (Nath Anna Power Sianan, Units I and 2), A!>S$219 NRC $4,56 i

(1979) j tess for sunding to intervene in licese smewiment pnaeding; IJPM29,32 NRC 92 (1990)

}

Washington Pubhc Power Supply Systan (WPPSS Nuckr Project No. 2), DD64-7,19 NRC $99,921 e

2 (1984) 62 sunderd fa imitation d 1206 proceedinas: DS945,32 NRC 128 0990)

[

t

.L T

1

.~-

l 17 7

i -

i e

f f x___,_,_...

I e

w

+--e

< w we-

.e w n

<*--*e

.-ev.,

m-...w.,--

m.

..ww,-

. %-e

-w.-,---

e.

--=,e._

m -

-e.w.,

-.r

~-

-%5hr A

f

?

I i

i d

ii

{

Li'G AL CITATIONS INDI'X RFGULATIONS

}

}

I 10 CF.R 1103,2.10 l

prior nonce and beanngs m special nuclear material heennes; LBP-9413,32 NRC 8 (1990) 10 CF.R.1107

-i suihority of a postd to determine issues telated to a Arawal of an styhcation, based on notice of heanng; 26'W32,32 NRC 180 (1990) board junsaction prior to issuance of Nance d lleanng; GPW32,32 hU 34 (19H))

10 CF.R. Part 2, Subparu D and O notice of hearing on civil penahy; GP 9431,32 NRC 107 (1990) i 10 CF.R.1201(c) l immediate effectaveneau of heense ar-endmeus, standard for, LDPW26,32 NRC 33 at (1990) 10 CF.R.1203 0

weight given to position of staff in terminanns a proceedu.s on the basis of a settlanant agreeman;

}

LDPW28,32 NRC 86 (1990)

!O CF.R. 2.206 axumuladon of opersiang discharges froen Seabrook plant, denial of pention asserting potential for hann

[

from; DD904,32 h1C 4655 (1990) extensim d stay of operinns beense requested on basis of recent previously undisclosed industry repcits of noncomphance at SeabaxA; DDW5,32 NRC 114128 (1990)

" 'E LNiliH%M*)@MIDN09 99 10 CF.R.1714(s) standard for 51erventi*, v perating hcense amendment prmeedings; GPW29,32 NRC 91 (1990)

I f

10 CF.R.1716 %Kl) g apphcanon of Ave-factor test to tamely filed contentions; ALAB-938,32 NRC 160 (1990) i{

6ve factor test for a&nissim d late 4 led catendms; A1.AB.937,32 NRC 147 nA0 (1990) gj five.fador test for admisron of supplanents to cmtentions; AIAB 938,32 NRC 10 n.5 (1990) j 10 CF.R.1714(aXiv. ")

enteria for grant of motion repen ietating to issues.at pteviously in centnmny amma the partica; AIAB-936,32 NRC 70 (1990) 10 CF.R.1714(aK3) amendment of irservenuon petiticns without leave of the board; GP 9429,32 NRC 91 (1990) 10 CF.R.1714(b) j s

j Ave factor test for s&nission of supplements to cornemions; ALAB.938,32 NRC 10 n.5 (1990)

!)

10 CF.k.1714(b)(1) l' f

deadhne for fihng contentions; GPW29,32 NRC 91 (1990)

}-

10 CF.R.1714(b)(2) content of cantendons; GP-9429,32 NRC 92 93 (1990)

i surpating documentation required for contendons at admission stye; AIAB-938,32 NRC IM (1990) 10 CF.R. 2.714(d)(2) i surpating documentanon required for coruentions at admission stage; AIAB-938,32 NRC iM (1990) f 10 CF.R. 2.714(d)(2Xii) l pmWIment of merits of a conteruim; UIP 90 25,32 NRC 25 (1990)

I h

h 19 i

l!

!)

l !.

I l

u

~

~

~-

- - -.. ~.. _.. _ _

l LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS r

10 CFA 1734(a) critens for grant of motim to nwen; AIAB 936,32 NRC 79 (1990) 10 CFA 1749 authority of posiding officers under; ISP 9426, 32 NRC 36 (1990) l 10 CF.R. 2.749(a) f h{

statemers of material facu accompanying surumary disposition monon,12P426,32 NRC 35 (1990) h 10 Cl A 2.749(d) 0 suniani for grant of summary dupaitaan. ISP.9426,32 NRC 36 (1990)

]j 10 CFA 2.760

'i arpeatabihty of dismunal of intervenor, MP.9424,32 NRC 19 (1990) 10 CF.R.1760s 1

/ l bosed findings required under, prior to declaradon of sua spmte issue; ISP 9032, 32 NRC 185 (1990) ht prumium fa raising sua spane issues, WIPM25,32 NRC 25 (1990) i.

standant for licensing tanf sua sponte adopuon of uncontrwerted issues; UIPM32,32 NRC lt) 0:

(1990) 4 i

i sundard for sua sponte adopion of issues by the prentdtng officer; UIPM24,32 NRC 17 (1990) h;i aus spume adopion of issues because of dum.asal of sole nmaimng imervenor, LEPM24,32 NRC 13 (1990) 10 CFA 2.764 i

inunedtais effectiveness raiew cf decutma authonnns operating license issuance; AIAB414,32 NRC

('-l, 3 et4 (1990) f' li, i 10 CFA 1788 failure of mmon for entensmn of suy to addreas enteru, Di>945,32 NRC 110 (1990)

[

[:

i 4

sundards for grant of a suy of suff's beensing actims. WPM 30,32 NRC 98 (1990) l 10 CF.R.112050) i t

apphcabihty to haunious materials; DPM23,32 NRC 11 (1990) j I

pnar notice and isarings e special nuclear matenal hemses; MPMD,32 NRC 8 (1990) j 1[:

waiver or exception to; UIPW23,32 NRC 9 (1990) is 10 CFA 2.1215(a) p L:

righu of nonlawyer repreacnutive of an organintion; OP424,32 NRC 15 (1990)

"'I 10 CFR.11231(s)(1) n)%rWp4 g g g 4 14@m#f staff obhgatim to serve a pany or esubluh a local pblic document room; ISPMM,32 NRC e2

[j (1990) a 10 CUA 11231(b)

['

authonty of posidmg officer to prescribe means for completing a record, ISPW27, 32 NRC 41 (1990)

['

incorporation of documenu in a pblic document room into a heanns file; UIPM27,32 NRC 42 L'

(1990)

F.

10 CF.R.11237(b)

[.

burde m poponent of motion to certify; IBPM23,32 NRC 9 (1990) i li t ;

10 CF.R.11239(a)

[j htigabihty of challenges to procedural regulanans affeart ssuance of special nuclear matenal licenses; i

O MPM23,32 NRC 9 (1990) h-(

j.

10 CF.R.11239(b) ground for steepion to regulatims; GPMD,32 NRC 9 (19H))

ji !

standard for directed cenification of challenged regulatima; GP.9423,32 NRC 9 (1990)

[I L l 10 CFA 11263 authonty to issue a tempwary suy; ISPM30,32 NRC 98 (1990) i h l 10 CF.R. Part 2. Appenda C D

.i noncanpliance with legally binding rquiremeru as beats for enforcemem acum; DD 90 5,32 NRC

, I 111 (1990) t p,

n

,3 1 j l.

A,_ _._,_. -

. ~..

i3 k

i LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX j

kFGULATIONS 10 CF.R. Part 20 1(EPA 61tratwn repairemenu for rucatch m.acwr, LEP-9430,32 NRC 98 (1990) standard for release d ra&oacuve gases dunns nama! operauon; DD-944,32 NRC 48,53 (1990) k 10 CFF Wl(c)

ALARA 4tandard for radioactive releases from researth rescur, LBP.9430,32 NRC 9% (1990) to CF.K. 20.106 hmiu on rs&oac6ve releases from rescan:h ructor; ISP.90-30,32 NRC 98 (1990) 10 CF.R. 30.32(1)(1) appbcabihty to pmaessors of unsealed radioacuve sourtes, IEP 90.ll,32 NRC 41,42 42 (1990) 10 CF.R. 30.33(aX2) equipment and facihty standards for byproduct material licmses, LHP.9430, 32 NRC 98 (1990) f 10 C.F.R. 50.9(s) hcmse avocanon of ground that informa6on provided to Commissim was not complete and accume in

{

all mccrial respecu; LEP-M26,32 NRC 34 (1990) 10 CF.R. 50.13(f) fmancial quahncadons for construc6cn of producum facihty; 12P-9426,32 NRC 37,38 (1990) t fmancial quahtications of alt cant to consuuct proposed facility in auch a way as to ensure adequate l

b protecnon of conwnon defense and somnty; LSP-9026,32 NRC 33 (1990)

}

10 CF.R. 50.36 conient of technical speciacanons; IEP.90 25,32 NRC 23, 27 (1990) removal of informanon from techrncal speci6cetions. L11P.9425,32 NRC 25 (1990) 10 CF.R. 50.47(aX2) basis fcr NRC An&ngs en adequacy of emergency planning', DD-944,32 b1C M (1990) 10 CFR. 50.47(b)

Seabrook anergency preparedness training, adequacy of; Da90-5,32 NRC 113 (1990)

Seabaxi peamnr.1 kimwledge and performance of duucs, adequacy of; DD.945,32 NRC !!2 (1990) 10 CF.R. 5047(b)(5) carly nonAcation and instruction reiuiremaus in mergency oQming; A1AB-936,32 NRC 79 (1990) anergency waming system for Seabrott, adequacy of, ALAll-935,32 NRC 62 (1990) 10 CF.R. 50.47(cXI) standani for licenas suspeassion relative to energency planni g deficiencies; AL/S,937,32 h1C 152 (1990); ALAB-939,32 NRC 180 (1990) 10 CF.R. 50.47(cXIXiii) h,0MEM,.

inMf4NM!M9MfNdN :

appucabihty of reahamhest efforta mio to school teachers; A1AB-937,32 NRC 148,149 (1990) j usumption el best-efforu tesponse by state and local governmaus in an emergmcy; ALAB-936, 32 NRC 82 n,17 (1990) 10 CF.R. 50.55(e), 50.72, and 50.73 failure to repoit violatima as basis for enfortement acuen; D&945,32 NRC til (1990) 10 CF.R. 50.92(c) challenges to license amendrnenta involving administrative matters that raise no signincant haurda g

conableration; LBP 9425,32 NRC 23 (1990)

(p 10 CF.R. Part 50 Appendix C financial quali6 cations for consuuedan of producuan facihty; LEP 9426,32 NRC 37,38 (1990)

~

10 CF.R. Pan 50, Anxndia E, IV Seabrook personnel knowledge and performance of duties, adequacy of; DD-945,32 KRC 112 (1990)

F 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendta E, IV.D early noti 5 cation and instruction sequiremenu in emergency planning; AIAlb936,32 NRC 79 (1990) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Amendia E. IV.D3 y}

alert signal activation and EBS broadcast, timing requimments for; AIAB-935, 32 NRC 70 (1990) design objective of prornpa public notincation system; AIAB-935,32 NRC 63, 69 n.46 (1990) design objectives for coverige and canpletion of initial naificade of the public c( an emergency; ALAB-936,32 NRC 79 (1990) 21 3

I i

i

~

~..

n i

~

.._____..._...._._..____...~.._._._.m...

m._.

.m.

-. ~.. -._. _ _ _

m_

-. ~

i I

w

~

g.

~~-~.~w.

=

4 e

I L

l' j

!H LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX

. ]-

arctLATioNs 1

truerptetanan of capability; ALA3 935,32 NRC 63 (1990)

?

tirning supunrneras, interpre* cm of; ALAB-935,32 NRC 67, 68 (1990)

.10 CFA hn 50, Appendi' E, IV.F -

3 seabmak enersenc? Prf*'*da**8 t'*inin8 adequuy ef; DI)945,32 NRC 113 (1990) j 10 CFA hn So, Aneh I 4

standani for release of ::4anctive gases during normal operation: D0"944,32 NRC 44. 5'. 52 (1990) g}

10 CFA hrt 50, Arpendia K f-...

~hl1 ) <

requirunants for emeriency care cooling systers; 40 904. 32 NRC 52 (199(D.

[

1.

10 CF.R. 31.22(cX14Xv) a

, l

. spplicabihty to pomsseson et unesaned radioactive sources; ISP-9427. 32 NRC 41 (1990) f

,l '

exemptien of license amendmera from requirer.w of an environmental assessment; LBP 90 77,32 NRC

-i a1 42 d (1990) d l{,

10 CF.R. 70.23(aX3) equipment and facihty standards for special nudur material licenses; IEP40 30,32 NRC 98 (1990) h j 40 CFA ha 61

,p-.}

hmits on inaclear power plant discharges; DDw904,32 NRC 45 (1990)

.gi ; :!

40 CFA ha 190 g

gr ',I i hmins on nuclear power plant discharges; DD444,32 NRC 45 (lv90) u I

47 CFA 73.901.962

?

j.

d.aniikn and pipae. of neriency bn= dean syman; ALAll 936,32 NRC 79 (1990)

Wl-y e o lVl 3

Y h(

[

j 1-i.

5

%e.es P,e e v

-- J f

-!lI j

j 1

a 3

l. i' I k

it c

.I h i-

. g i,

- h '.

~i -

-y p

!ff ! -

irt.

i:

{'

4i:

u f

ji 11 i,

n

.1 v

~

\\

\\

th

'.I e,

t t

i

.,th,;'

l 7 I'.

22 h > !',

in ilq g e.

i._

l

---. -. _. ~ ~. -. - -. ~

i

[t t'

l i

I l

e-LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATtril3 I

}

i i

Atomic Energy Act,186(a), 49 U.S.C. 2236(a) l applicabihty to revocanon of bcenses; UIP 9426,32 NRC 36 (1990) grounds for avocanon of licmses; LBP-9026,32 NRC 36, 38 (1990)

Atomic I:nesgy Act,189e I

heanns righia on changes to cyclespecinc parameten and fuel informadon; UIP 9425,32 NRC 26 (1990)

Massachuseus Ov0 Defense Act, 3L 1950, c. 639, (20 obligadon of school teachen to comply with Gwernor's direcuves dunna an emergary; A1AB-937,32 NRC 150 (1990)

Nsuonal umranmental 1%ticy Ack 42 U.S.C. (4321 g

rule of reason egainst which environmental catentions are judged, AIAB-938,32 NRC 158 (1990) 5 h 'i t

\\'

I i

I I

l

(

WWpype6pt9PJilS '4]l P

1 l

,1

}

l,

-l l

h 1

e f

2.3 i

-a n,,..-,-

~.---

.... - -..l i

r I

i I

i SUlljECT INDEX i

i e

)

ACGDENf3,IDJ3 OF COOL #ft' sesyaev d notincadan syetan fa warning the pubbe of; DD944,32 NRC 45 (1990) j APPEAa, "CRDS d,

ade,sary op uans; A1AB 9%,32 NRC 75 (1990)

APITALS andtlement of interverwrs who have withdrawn; ALAB-934,32 NRC 1 (1990) 4 APP 11 LATE DECSIONS effect of knmedsste effectivmess aview on, ALAB 937,32 NkC 135 (1990) 4 ATOh0C ENEROY ACT 1

content of te&nical speci6 cations; 1RP 9425,32 NRC 21 (1990) hanns rights = cycrating license amenanmt; LDPM25,32 NRC 21 (1990) revocadan d licenses for postheensing failures; 13PM26,32 NRC Su (1990)

DIAS adjudicatory board, pany's disendantment with prior board ruhngs as bass for claim of; AIAB 9%,32 NRC 75 (1990)

(

DOARDS 3

See Appeal Boards; Licensing Boards

/

j y

BORATION i

i I

loss of abihty to reduce modes; LBPM32,32 NRC 181 (1990)

F I

DUPEN OF PROOF Z

~,

l La jusufy waiver of reguladms; IEPM23,32 NRC 7 (1990)

(

l i

DYPRODUCT MATERIAIS LICENSE 3 t'

{

content d applications for; LilP 9430,32 NRC 95 (1990) 7 -

I l

l CElGIFICATION I

h' O!ECK VALVES h D M, See Directed Certincation is6$E$@l.!nilEW.IMb@!

preventive mainienance at Seabrook; DDM5,32 NRC 109 (1900) l 1 ~

OVIL PENALTY j

hearing request for reconsideration of; LDPM31,32 NRC 1(Tl(1990) 1 CONTENTIONS bued on factual underpinning in a document that has be casentally repudiated by the soun;e d that document, admissibihty of; A1AB 938,32 NRC 15e basis and speciAdty requiremenu for admission of; ALA.

.,32 NRC 154 (1990)

{

cnvuonmental, rule of reason applied ict CLl47,32 NKC s29 (1990) y merits determuistions at admission stage; AIAD 938,32 NRC 154 (1990) supplenentatim, Sve factor test applied to; ALAB 738,32 NRC 154 (1990) 3 DEOSIONS

.i pubhahed, canpleteness of; ALAB 938,32 NRC 154 (1990)

See also Appellate Decisions DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROCEEDINO l

j f,

i effect of pendency of, m dismissal of intervenor for changed circumstances relevant to standtng; LSPM24,32 NRC 12 (1990) i 2s

~.

l l

I 1

l,

(

i i

i 1

SUBJirrINDEX j

otRECTED CixnnCATION i

of request for waiver of reguladms, demal for failun to make prvna facie showing; ISP 9423,32 NRC 7 (1990) g

'2j DISMISSAL OF PAlmES

, jo based on changed circumstances relevant to standing, ISP-9424,32 NRC 12 (1990) l{7};]

for nonpardespsum on amanded issues; AIAB 934,32 NRC 1 (1990)

I fran ene mayor segment of a proceeding. effect on iu prucipation in oder segmenu; AIAB 934,32 f,

NRC i (1990) t j ],

treatment of subsequent submissions by dismissed party; AIAB 939,32 NRC 165 (1990) j LMEROLNCY BROADCAST SYSTEM 4)..

heensee respmaibihty for notificauan of; A!AB-936,32 NRC 75 (1990)

I i, f l'M13GENCY PLANNING Uj i for heenses to poucas raductive materials in unsealed fam; LBP-9427,32 NRC 40 (1990) l

[;

implemendng procedures for shchering measures; ALAll-939,32 NRC 165 (1990) j l

jj interpauden of initial nodficadon mluinment; AIAD-935,32 NRC 57 (1990) i l;

pubhc red 6cadon requiremenu; AIAB-935,32 NRC 57 (1990)

EMEROENCY PLANNLNG ZONE

.b bomdaries drawn to cmform to pohtical junsdictim rather thar; strict radius, ALAB-935,32 NRC 57

[

3 (1990)

(

EMERGENCY PLANS

[

!l content of notificauon and pubhc informatim requiremenu; ALAB 93$,32 NRC 57 (1990); ALAB-936, 32 NRC 75 (1990) d i;

!! l l h discrepancy between plan and implemenung pmcedures as basis for m1uest for stay of operating s'

l'; h license; DD 945,32 NRC IW (1990) evacuauon deciatms, respimsibility for; DD-944, 32 NRC 45 (1990) utihty sponsored, pesumpuun of best-effons respmse to; AIAB-9%,32 NRC 75 (1990)

E udhty-sponsored, seahsm rule apphed to; ALAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990)

! i udhty-sponswed, teacher tole stendonment and adequacy of; ALAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990) 1 4I !

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS l j training program, de6cieneses in as basis for suy request; DD-945,32 NRC 109 (1990) 1 1

EMERGENCY WARNING SYSHMS q

componets of; A!AB-935,32 NRC 57 (1990) lj timing requinmenu fur, AIAll 935,32 NRC 57 (1990) kggg,gga l

l#i$ $ 4' W @ i$;

l See also Ncd6caum EN10RCEMEN1' PROCEEDING 1

terminatim of, beensing bosni authonty to attime based sa seulemmt agreement; IEP-90 48, 32 NRC p' li 15 (190) l,

EQUIPMEKr I 'i:

tagging and isoladon procedure at Seabmok, adequacy of, DD 945,32 NRC 109 (1990)

ESSENHAL SERVICE WATER SYSTEM

[>

failure to return redundant trains to operable sutus; DD-904,32 NRC 195 (1990)

EVACUATION

[ j.

responsibility for decisionmaking: DD-9M 32 NRC 45 (1990)

I EVIDENCE i

reuance en documenu not admitted into the record; ALAB 937, 32 NRC 135 (1990) d*

I..

ET.DERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[q views m notincadon mpiremenu; AIAB-935,32 NRC 57 (1903)

'h 41 FINANCIAL QUAllHCATIONS

/l material false statemenu on, as basis for revocatim of license; LEP-9426,32 NRC 30 (1990)

FIRE PROTEC110N p'

}

for heenses to possess radioactive materials in unse41cd farm; LBP 94U,32 NRC 40 (1990)

GLOVE BOX design of; LDP-9430,32 NRC 95 (1990) it

. r 2.

il1--_

,--..~..,...~.----.-a-.~.-

SUlljECT INDEX i

i

?

GROUNDWA11R radioacbve releases w, DDW4,32 NRC 45 (1990) 11 CARING I-ILE inclusim of docummu in pubbe document suam in; ISP 9427,32 NRC 40 (1990) presidmg officer's authonty over, LEP 942?,32 NRC 40 (1990)

ILLARINO REQU!ITS fcr rumaideradon of civil penahy; LSP 9431,32 NRC 107 (1990) on cperating lismse amendment, LDPM25,32 NRC 21 (1990)

IIEPA FILTERS DOP testing of, IRPM30,32 NRC 95 (1990) j IMMEDIATE ITItCTIVINESS REVIEW effect on appul board decisions; ALAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990) of decisions authorizing operating heense issuance, em{uiranent for. ALAB-934,32 h1C 1 (1990)

)

INSTTTLTili FOR NUC11AR K)WER OPERA 110NS nparts of noncomphances at Seabmok as basis for aquest for estension of stay of operating bcense; DD%$,32 NRC 109 (1990)

I t'

INITRVENOR$

dumissal as a pany based on changed circumstances; LEP-9424,32 NRC 12 (1990) f l

withdrawn, wilemme to appeal; ALAB-934,32 NRC 1 (1990)

INTERVEhTl '

in operstmg accnse amendment proceedmgs, showing nemsary to entabhsh; LEPW29,32 NRC 89 l

(1990) orgamisumal, affidavit requimnent to estabbsh, LEP 9429,32 NRC 19 (1990) eraartintional, showing necessary for, LEP-9429 32 NRC 49 (1990) i INTIRVEhTION PCITTIONS

{

amendment of; LEPM29,32 NRC 89 (1990) 4 LICENS!NO BOARDS f{

authority to apprwe termination of enforcement proceedmg on basis of settlement agreement; j

LilPM24,32 NRC 85 (190)

}

authority to declars sua sponte issucs; LEPW32,32 NRC lli (1990)

[

ermt in dumissuig teacher role abandorrnent contendm; A1AB-937,32 NRC 135 (1990)

}

MAINITNANCE

' e

%$f i+ WtiMilbt!$6

}

N allegitima of pmbians at Seabmok; Da945,32 NRC IM (1990)

MATERIAL FALSE STATEMEhTS as basis far revocatim of license; LEPM26,32 NRC 30 (1990)

MATERIALS tlCENSE AMENDMENTS issuance during pmdency of a pmceedmg; LilP 9423,32 NRC 7 (1990)

)

MONTIVRING

]

of Seabrook activities, programs, and supervisors, adequacy of, D4945,32 NRC 109 (1990)

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POllCY ACT rule of reason applied to consideratim of runote and speculative events; AIAB-933,32 h1C 154 (1990) i rule of rususi apphed to envimnmenul ccotersions; Cll#7,32 NRC 129 (1990)

[

NEPIUNIUM f

handimg of; LEPM30,32 NRC 95 (1990) 3 NO SIGNIFICANT llA7ARDS REMMT stanificance of errors in, LDPM32,32 NRC 181 (1990) 3 NONCOMPilANCES industry reporu of, as basis for request for entension of suy of Seabmok operating license; DDMS, 32 NRC 109 (1990) 27

~,~ ~,

,. v--

I Pi r

ib.

SUlljEcr INDEX i

i I

e l

NO!1FICATION t

emersmey, content of crne.rgmcy plan rapdmnenu en; AIAB 9% 32 NRC 75 (1990)

[

cmersecy, rutism rule olyhed kr AIAB 936,32 NRC 75 (1990) imerpretation of 15 ndnute nquiremmt; AIAB-935,32 NRC 57 (1990) -

of public of rs&ological emersecy; AIAB-935,32 NRC 57 (1990)

OPERA 11NO IJCENSE AMENDMFNr PkOCEEDINO E.

l [

. standmg to intervene in; GP-9429,32 NRC 89 (1990)

[

)

OPINIONS advisory, rehance e ressming of; AIAB 9% 32 NRC 75 (1990)

[

l

'l PENALTY ses Ovil Pauhy

}

PIPINO at Seabronk, material emdithm of; DD 945,32 NRC 109 (1990) l

- Pt.lff0NIUM 8

. handling of; GP.9430,32 NRC 95 (1990)

E PRE 31 DING OiHCER

(

authority over haring %; GP-9427,32 NRC 40 (1990) f PROOF i

See Bunim of Pinot i

PUBLJC DOCUMFXT ROOM y

inclusion of document fnxu, in hearing % of Sutpart proceedeg; GP-9427,32 NRC 40 (1990)

RADIOACITVE REGASES l

annospheric wnting of operating emissions: DS944,32 NRC 45 (1990) i t

a conuirunent af fusim gases during radiological emergency; DD944,32 NRC 45 (1990)

.I to groundwater, DD-904,32 h1C 45 (1990)

I REACTOR COOLAhT i

. loop, eutsge time; ISP-9432,32 NRC 181 (1990)

REAllSM RUM

- epplicabihty to teacher sole abandonment; A1AB-937,32 NRC 135 (1990)

IMWd!QS*%idM$i41 sppheation to pre emergency conduct of state and local governmenu; ALAB-937,32 NRC 135 (1990) ke@itgMil/

b REOULATIONS

~

r.

i compliance with regulatory guides as presumpive evidence of cornpliance with; GP 9430,32 NRC 95

^

i l.

l

- (1990) -

(i l

interpretation of Part 50, Appendix guidance on warning systans; AIAB-935,32 NRC 57 (1990) waiwr of, burden of proof to justify; ISP 9423, 32 NRC 7 (1990)

_+

waiver of, prima facie showing required for grant of' GP 9423,32 NRC 7 (1990) i REOUIATORY OUIDES I

canphance with as presumptive evidence of compliance with regulations; LBP 9430,32 NRC 95 -

p I

(1990).

')

more demanding than regul4tions; AIAB-935,32 NRC 57 0990) q

- REMANDED ISSUES

}*-

I

- appeal rights of intervenor who fails to participew on; ALAD 934,32 NRC i (1990)

I REOITA1NO A' RECORD.

f burde on sponsors of motion for; ALAB-9% 32 NRC 75 (1990)

O t

criteria for, AIAB 9% 32 NRC 75 (1990)

[

timehnass considerations where motion does not address signiacant safety or environmmtal issues; i,

AIAB.9% 32 NRC 75 (1990) 3 h

REVIEW g

1 See Immediate Effectiveness RevWw 2

d REVOCATION OF IJCENSE3 I

for posthcensing failures; LDP-9426,32 NRC 30 (1990) b

)i l

4 l

k t

,L t

l

. ~.,. - -

n k

t l

+ ;.,,, ~n..

a i

3. ?

'}t SUlljECT INDEX

[

t

?

0 RUIES OF PRACflCE admissibihty of corumtims based m factual underpuunns in a donenas that has bem unmtially j

repudiated by the source of that documan; AIAB-938,32 NRC 154 (1990) ammdmat of irsevendon petitims; IEP 9429,32 NRC 89 (1990) i g -

. basas and specl6 city requirements for admission of contendons; ALAB 938,32 NRC 154 (1990) burde of pmot to justify waiver of regulations; LSPM23,32 NRC 7 (1990) completeness of published decisions; ALAB-938,32 NRC 154 (1990) j

'j dismissal of organizatimal intervam based on changed circumstances; LEPM24,32 NRC 12 (1990) f dismissal of pernes; AIAB-939,32 NRC 165 (1990)

{

effect of dismissal of pany from one major segment of a proceeding on its parGeipatier, in other l

usmaus; AIAB 934,32 NRC I (1990) j 6ve futer test applied to syplementation of cayennons; AIAB-938,32 NRC 154 (1990) j heating rights a ground for waiver of 10 C.F.R. 2.12050); LDPM23,32 NRC 7 (1990) lmrnediate effecdvens review, effect on appul board decisions; AIAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990) 9 intervention by a group or orgsidzation, showing necessary for, IEP 9429,32 NRC 89 g1990) licaising bosni authority to appmvo terminatim of enforcernent paceeding on buis of seulement agroanent; LEP 9428,32 NRC 45 (190) 4 menu determinatims at cornanim aanission suge; A1AB 938,32 NRC 154 (1990) participation in other pmceedings u basis fu standing to imervene; LEPM29,32 NRC 89 (1990)

E P

b reliance on documenu not adnuued into the record; ALAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990) f y ;

reopening a record, burden en spansas of motion; AIAD-936, 32 NRC 75 (1990) li' reopming a reconi, criteria for, ALAB 936, 32 NRC 75 (1990) j p

};

shrming necessary to estabhsh standmg in operating licese ammenent proceedings; LEP 9429,32 6

~

NRC 89 (1990) standing to intervae in operating license amendman pacceding; [EF9429,32 NEC 89 (1990) sua sponte adopion of lasues of dismissed intervenor: 1 EPM 24,32 NRC 12 (1990) lt-Subpart I, autherity to issue temporary suy; LBP 9430,32 NRC 95 (1990)

J-Subpart 1, bearing file, inclusion of documents in public document roan in; ISP-90-27,32 NRC 40

• !p$hliWhi$8 lsn$WNd*4!6lllNM N

Subpart I, presiding officer's authonty over heanns Ale; IEPM27,32 NRC 40 (1990) i

?

summary dispositim as pleadings; IBP 90-26,32 NRC 30 (1990) timebness considatims where motion to scopen does nnt address sigm5 cant safety or environmental 3

lasues; AIAB-936,32 NRC 75 (1990) 7 A

$ANC110N3 E

i dismissal of intavenor for neparticipation on remanded issues; ALAB-934, 32 NRC I (1990) i SClicob TEACllERS realism mle splied to; AIAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990)

$[.

role abandonment during radiological emergencies, licasing board error in dismissal of contention un; 4

ALAB 937,3; NRC 135 (1990)

SETILEMENT AGREEMPRf

j u basis for tenninatim of enforcemmt pec-Ang; IEPM28,32 NRC 85 (190) if 3

SHELTERINO implanenting procedures far, AIAB-939,32 NRC 165 (1990)

SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIA!J emergency planning or fire prevention; IEP 9427,32 NRC 40 (1990)

+

[

SPECIAL NUCEAR MATERIAL.S LICENSE 3 1

content of splications for; 12P-9430,32 NRC 95 (1990) f}.-

issuance daring pmdecy of special materials cues; IEP 9421,32 NRC 7 (1990)

STANDING TO INTERVENE

-f disentionary, test for; IEP-9424,32 NRC 12 (1990) j.

participation in other recenlings as basis for; IEPM29,32 NRC 89 (1990) 29 u

e h

1 1

1-w-i--

y-ee7 g-.

,--yr-sy-,,

e e,,-

e--

am-e-

e w

w-

a l

l i

M*:

~

.r

,.c.

-u m

y rw,

.4

"-w easted64,nd -

h r,~

).j { {

l p,

!i:

+

k 19 x

i j

' li.

SUlijECT INDFX h~

.1:

I,

)

STAY j

of operating beense, duenpsncy between ernersency plan and ernerrney plan irnplancnung procedures j

as basis fw repast far, DD 945,32 NRC 109 (1990)

'l of operating license, lack of employa knowledes of job decriptions as tusis for request for, DS945.

i 32 NRC 109 (1990) innprsry, authority to issue; LilPM30,32 NRC 95 (1990)

SUA SPOfffE ISSUES l

adaptian of Wuns of disrnissed irnerwnor es; UlPM24, 32 NRC 12 (1990) licensing baani ausharity to declare; LBPM32,32 NRC ist (l990)

(

$UMMARY Dl3 POSITION i!

lirahations en oss of, LBPM26,32 HRC 30 (1990)

TECilNICAL $PECIFICATIONS j

allegations of violation of, at Perry plant; Dt>906,32 NRC 195 (1990)

a... '

of; DP 90 29, 32 NitC 89 (1990)

}

changs in modo reduction.6

LAP 9432, 32 NRC 181 (1990)

}

1 consent of; IEP 90-25,32 NRC 21 (1990)

YALVES-See Chad Valves i

WAIVER I

i I

of resuistians, burden of proof to justify; UIPN2,32 NRC 7 (1990) l of regulations, prima facie showing squired for trent of; LSP4D,32 NltC 7 (1990) i,

- l

=

)

s 4

li}lydd*61 W

'hM[hh hibh p

t

. ;)

o k

l

• n q -

{ s . k e m ~ b p y i-i 30 4 .,b o e .L T

- -.. -. - -. - -- -.. - ~... -...-~.-._,.m I k l ) \\ l l l l, I J FACILITY INDEX i lf' L \\ f IT.RRY NUCLFAR PO%TR PLANT, Unit 1; LAxiet Na 54440 l s i OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMFNT; July D,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Dmying i i l Staffs and Ucensee's Mouans for Ruonsideratias); UlP.9425,32 NRC 21 (1990) i REQU13T IOR ACTION, Septanber 25, 1990; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. i i 6 2.206, DD 946, 32 NRC 195 (1990) QUAD CTTIES NUCUAR K)%TR STATION; Docket Nus. 54254-OM,54265 OM ENFORCEMENT; August 1,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Appronng Sctdement '.i Agreemmt and Ternunadng Proceedmas); UIP.9428,32 NRC 15 (1990) i* SEAllROOK STATION. Unit 1; Dxist Na 54443 i k REQUl:ST FOR ACTION; July 9,1990L DIRECIDR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. $ 1206, [k DD 944,32 NRC 45 (1990) REQUEST 10R ACTION, August 31, 1990; DIRECIUR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 61206, DD 945,32 NRC 10) (1990) SEADROOK STATION, Unas 1 and 2, Dxiet Nos. 54443 01., 54444 OL OPERAUNO UCENSE; July 9,1990; DECISION, AIAB 934,32 NRC 1 (1990) ( OPERAMNO UCENSE; August 20,1990, DECISION; ALAD-935,32 NRC 57 (1990); ALAD 936, 32 NRC 75 (1990) O / OPERADNO UCENSE; September it,1990; DTCISION; AIAD-937,32 NRC 135 (1990) ~ OPERATING UCENSE, September 28, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RI;OARDING REITRRED QUESTIONS; AIAB.939,32 NRC 165 (1990) l f TURKEY POINT NUCIIAR OENERATING PLANT, Umts 3 and 4, lhkei Nos 54250 OLA 5, 542514tA 5 = } OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMENT; July 18, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (M,xion to ( L [ Dismus); UIP 90 24, 32 NRC 12 (1990) l W Jjsh % N N OPERAUNO UCENSE AMENDMENT; Sepanha 25, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER '. asWg);;6ffR (Cmsideration of Prusible Sua Sponte Issues), l.DP 9432,32 NRC 181 (1990) f VERMONT YANK!1 NUCIIAR LOWER STAT 10N; Ducket No. 5427101A .f OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMFNT; Sepurnher 21, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; O; CU 947, 32 NRC 129 (1990) d OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMENT; Sepcmber 21, 1990; NOTICF; AIAB-918,32 NRC 154 j i (1990) '4 V(XITII ELFCTRIC OENERATINO PLANT, Umts I and 2; Docket Nos. 54424 OLA,54425 0LA j OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMUNT; August 16, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ] o j (latervention Petitim); UlP.90L29, 32 NRC 89 (1990) 3 1 f. l t. i i 31 t 7 l .}}