ML20028G334
| ML20028G334 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1983 |
| From: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Cavanaugh W ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028G335 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-82-09, GL-82-9, NUDOCS 8302080434 | |
| Download: ML20028G334 (5) | |
Text
_
p e,
f i..
January 26, 1983 A
~
DISTRIBUTION
{DocketFile)
GVissing Ob mu, run RIngram L PDR Gray File +4 Docket No. 50-313 ORB #4 Rdg EBlackwood DEisenhut H0rnstein OELD PShemanski AE0D Mr. Willian Cavanaugh, III LHannon-2 Senior Vice President ACRS-10 Enerqy Supply Arkansas Power 7. Light Company TBarnhart-4 P. O. Box 551 OGC Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 OPA DBrinkman
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
RDiggs ASLAB SU4 JECT: SAFETY EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMEtlTAL QUALIFICATION (EO) 0F SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Re:
Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No.1 (ANO-1)
This letter transnits the Safety Evaluation for the E0 of safety-related electrical equipment at your facility. This evaluation 1: based on your response to our previous Safety Evaluation, dated October 2, 1981 and subsequent subnittals dated February 18, February 27, July 21 (0CAN078221), July 29 (OCAN078220),
August 13, and Novenber 12, 1932.
This Safety Evaluation presents the results of the EQ Revia.w for safety-related electrical equionent, exnosed to a harsh environnent, in accordance with NRC requirements. We request that you provide your plans for qualification or replacenent of the equipnent in NRC Categories I.8, II. A and II.B (presented in the Technical Evaluation Reports) and the schedule for acconplishing your proposed corrective actions to us within ninety (90) days of the receipt of this letter.
As indicated in the conclusion section of the Safety Evaluation, we request that you reaffirm the justification for continued operation and within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, subnit infomation for itens in NRC Cateqories I.B. II.A and II.B (presented in the enclosed Technical Evaluation Report) for which.iustification for continued operation was not previously subnitted to the NRC. He suggest that the clarification set forth in Iten 8 of Generic Letter No. F-09, " Clarification Questions and Answers on Environ-nental Qualification Ryuirenents," should be considered in your justification for continued operation.
The Technical Evaluation Report contains certain identified ir.fomatif on which you have previously clained to be proprietary.
We request that you inforn us as indicated in the proprietary section of the Safety Evaluation whether any nortions of the identified pages still require proprietary protection.
At your option, the staff will be available to discuss the findings in the Safety Evaluation as auqnented by the Technical Evaluation Report. Questions regarding this letter should be directed through the NRC Project Manager for vm r niant, erriccp
- = " >
eaoaos0424 e20125
- = wocx osooo g om, nne ronu ais sio-soi sscu om OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usaro
- mi-ass eo
e g.
y j
t r
^
i Mr. William Cavanaugh,
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, 103LM3.s s:c zoyg i
df'MLSTOLza,e' John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
1.
Safety Evaluation 2.
Technical Evaluation Report cc w/o Enclosure 2:
See next page i
,,,,,,,p88,4,;D{,,,,,[Q3,;D{
_ C.-
4:DL....
OmCE >
GVi ng;cf PShemanski i
sunsaut,
..... -1/jk83 1/J /83 1/24/83 o,,,,
NRC Form 3188 (4 79) NRCM 0240
...........,...,..o,..cs:
....-e.>==
=!
ur a
y fg UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
-l WASHWGTON, D. C. 20655
.'I
%,,,,, + *4 January 26, 1983
$~ f Docket No. 50-313 l}
.j i
Mr. William Cavanaugh, III Senior Vice President f
Energy Supply l
Arkansas Power & Light Company P. O. Box 551 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 l
1 f
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
I
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION (EQ) 0F SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Dl Re:
Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No.1 (ANO-1) 1 This letter transmits the Safety Evaluation for the EQ of safety-related electrical equipment at your facility. This evaluation is based on your response to our previous Safety Evaluation, dated October 2,1981 and subsequent j
submittals dated February 18, February 27, July 21 (0CAN078221), July 29 (OCAN078220),
August 13, and November 12, 1982.
This Safety Evaluation presents the results of the EQ Review for safety-related electrical equipment, exposed to a harsh environment, in accordance with NRC We request that you provide your plans for qualification or l
requirements.
replacement of the equipment in NRC Categories I.B, II.A and II.B (presented in the Technical Evaluation Reports) and the schedule for accomplishing your proposed corrective actions to us within ninety (90) days of the receipt of
,3 this letter.
As indicated iri the conclusion section of the Safety Evaluation, we request that you reaffirm the justification for continued operation and within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, submit information for items in NRC i
Categories I.B, II.A and II.B (presented in the enclosed Technical Evaluation j
Report) for which justification for continued operation was not previously -
submitted to the NRC. We suggest that the clarification set forth in Item 8 of Generic Letter No. 82-09, " Clarification Questions and Answers on Environ-mental Qualification Requirements," should be considered in your justification j
for continued operation.
The Technical' Evaluation Report contains certain identified information'which We request that you inform you have previously claimed to be proprietary.
us as indicated in the proprietary section of the Safety Evaluation whether I
any portions of the identified pages still require proprietary protection.
At your option, the staff will be available to discuss the findings in the Questions l,
Safety Evaluation as augmented by the Technical Evaluation Report.
!j regarding this letter should be directed through the NRC Project Manager for t
i your piant.
j ff
1 I
Mr. William Cavanaugh il The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required snder P.L.96-511.
incerely* P i!
) t i
o rE'F. Stolz, Chief
!l rating Reactors Branch #4 l '.
Division of Licensing
\\. '.
'j
- 1.,
Enclosures:
1.
Safety Evaluation Ll 2.
Technical Evaluation Report i
.j cc w/o Enclosure 2:
i See next page i:
t i
i
(
l:
l
=
i !
t l'
1 t
i i
~
^7~~~~
~]
~
Arkansas Power & Light Company ccw/ enclosure (s):
fir. John R. Marshall c
Manager, Licensing
~l Arkansas Power & Light Company P. O. Box 551 Director, Bureau of Environmental i
'l Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Health Services 1
4815 West Markham Street
-l Mr. James P. O'Hanlon Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 General Manager
.j Arkansas Nuclear One P. O. Box 608 Russellville, Arkansas 72801
- l Mr. Leonard Joe Callan 4
i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 2090 l
Russellville, Arkansas 72801 ii N
Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox I
Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Mr. Nicholas S. Reynolds Debevoise & Liberman 120017th Street, NU Washington, DC 20036 l
Honorable Ermil Grant Acting County Judge of Pope County Pope County Courthouse Russellville,-Arkansas 72801,
Regional Radiation Representative EPA Region VI 1201 Elm Street
.~
Dallas, Texas 75270 fir. John T. Collins, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV lingt n Te a
$1
~
6 9
--