ML20028E087

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-410/82-12.Corrective Actions:Field Planner SB-400 Canceled & General Engineering Procedure Modified to Add Specified QA Category Designation to Checklist
ML20028E087
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/30/1982
From: Manno S
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20028E081 List:
References
NUDOCS 8301200336
Download: ML20028E087 (3)


Text

_

M Y NIAGARA 4

RUMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORAN/300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 SAMUEL F. MANNO VICE PRESIDENT j

NUCLE AR CONSTRUCTION December 30, 1982 Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I Attention: Mr. R.

',l.

Starostecki, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re:

Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr. Starostecki:

Your Inspection Report No. 50-410/82-12 dated November 29, 1982 identified one apparent violation resulting from an inspection conducted at the Nine Mile Point-Unit 2 construction site.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's response is enclosed.

Very truly yours, Mw S. F. Manno Vice President Nuclear Construction

/djm Enclosure xc: Mr. R. D. Schultz, Resident Inspector Director of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 l

8301200336 830114 l

PDR ADOCK 05000410 l

G PDR

1 STATE OF NEW YORK 1

ss:

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA S. F. MANNO, being duly sworn says:

f I am Vice President - Nuclear Construction of Niagara Mohawk Power i

l Corporation.

I have read the foregoing letter and attachment, and the 3

)

information contained in the letter and attachment is true to the best of my

{

knowledge, information and belief.

5. F. Manno

)

i Sworn to before me on 8o d-day of Decembe-1982 I

this ll W16$14

' w Notary ' Pub lic 4

GAIL M. AHERN e., e.bw.a ih. swo el New Yo((

c i.t d on 4.e. c way my gem uen inoires u mb 30,1 %

4 l

.+

4 NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET N0. 50-410 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION ATTACHED TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT N0. 50-410/82-12 The apparent violation was identified as follows:

A.

10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by document instructions, procedures.... and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings".

ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc., ASME Quality Assurance Manual, QCF-4.1, Process Control, Revision 7, states in part that the field engineer shall submit the field planner to the Quality Control Documentation Supervisor for review and approval of adequate instructions and inclusion of all required procedures for work to be performed and adherence to specification requirements.

Contrary to the above, Field Planner SB-400 for ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section 3, Class 3, Service Water Piping was not submitted to the Quality Control Documentation Supervisor for review and approval. As a result, the field planner had been released by Engineering for j

fabrication and installation with welding control and material requirements not correctly specified.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement II).

The following is submitted in response to this item of nonconformance:

Field Planner SB-400 has been cancelled. As stated in the Nuclear Regulatory Conmissio-inspection Report 82-12, ITT Grinnell issued a stop work order on all small bore piping in order to determine if any other small bore planner packages were issued with the incorrect category designation.

In addition, ITT Grinnell reviewed 679 Category II large bore piping planner packages to ensure the correct category designation.

ITT Grinnell's review of all other small bore planner packages and the 679 Category II large bore piping planner packages indicated that all had the correct QA category designations.

ITT Grinnell is modifying General Engineering Procedure (GEP) 40 to incorporate a checklist to ensure that the correct QA category designation is j

specified. This checklist will be maintained in the ITT Grinnell Engineering office and attached to the original planner.

In response to Corrective Action Report 539, ITT Grinnell has implemented the checki:. in their review cycle for issuing all planners. The ITT Grinnell General tngineering Procedure (GEP) 40 will be issued by January 31, 1983.

l l