ML20028D458

Motion for Clarification of ASLB 830111 Memorandum & Order, to Explain Whether First or Second Prehearing Conference Per 10CFR2.752 Intended

ML20028D458
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	01/15/1983
From:	Eddleman W EDDLEMAN, W.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8301190150
Download: ML20028D458 (1)

Text

t . -

]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA cohvynD J2Euary15,1983 NUCLEAR BEGULATORY COMMISSION pq'N BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Glenn O. Bright Dr. James H. Carper.ter James L. Kelley, Chairman In the Matter of

) Dockets 50 400 OL CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT CO. et al. ) 50 401 OL (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units i and 2) )

)

Motion for Clarification by Wells Eddleman The Board's January 11, 1983 Menorandun and Order (servec January 12;h), at page 17 (botton) nentions a "second prehearing conference" which is "nrinarily for" discussion of " discovery and scheduling questions".

It is my understanding that what was held previously in this docket (July 1982) was a "special prehearing conference" under 10 CPR 2.751a, and not a "nrehearing conference" under 10 CFR 2.752.

LO CFR nart 2, Annendix A IV (b) states that "Under the Connission's rules of nractice, discovery ... mur.t be connleted by the second nrchearing conference ...". It annears that the tynes of itens discussed in section 2 752 were not much of the agenda of the July conference, but the 2.751a listing of items to be covered was the nrincinal subject matter thereof.

Because my perhaps too literal reading of the January 11 Memorandun and Order seems to inply that little or no discovery nay take place in this proceeding, I ask the Board to clarify whether a "second" or n "f'iva t" prehearing conf erence under 2.752 was meant.

b kDOC O!OO gg b P_ --