ML20028D011
| ML20028D011 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/23/1982 |
| From: | Barnes I, Oller R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028D006 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900762 NUDOCS 8301140397 | |
| Download: ML20028D011 (12) | |
Text
f ORGANIZATION:
NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
NES DIVISION DANBURY, CONNECTICUT REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900762/82-01 DATE(S) 10/20-21/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 12 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Nuclear Energy Services, Inc.
NES Division ATTN:
Mr. W. J. Manion, President 1000 Shelter Rock Road Danbury, CT 06810 OR'IANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. F. J. Williams, Jr., Acting Mgr., Quality Assurance TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(203) 748-3581 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Engineering and C Services, and fuel racks and tool fabrication.
NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: The company's activities are 98% nuclear related.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
//~[8'N R. E. Oller, Reactive & Component Program Date Section (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
APPROVED BY:
8e
// - 2. J-P2 I. Barnes, Chief, R& CPS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE:
Status of previous inspection findings and 10 CFR Part 21.
l PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Calvert Cliffs, Units 1 and 2, 50-317/318; Lacrosse,50-409;NorthAnnggtJnis 0@
and 2, 50-338/339.
i
.y-p
<;Y$ht,n h gdg MV I
8301140397 821126 PDR GA999 EECNESI 99900762 PDR L
[
l l
l ORGANIZATION:
NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
NES DIVISION l
DANBURY, CONNECTICUT REPORT INSPECTION NO.*
99900762/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 6 i
A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Nonconformance A (81-01):
Failure to perform formal int.ernal audits of all sections of the NES QA manual on an annual basis since January 1980 as required by Section 18 of the NES QA Manual 80A9002.
The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, NES performed an internal systems audit of all 18 criteria of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B during the week preceding March 31, 1982, as applicable to each of the 3 QA manuals for general engineering, inservice inspection, and QA services. Also, paragraph 18.3.2 of the General Engineering QA Manual 90A9002 was revised to allow utilization of all project, site, and systems audits in the internal audit program where the scope of the specific audit covered the entire section of the manual audited.
2.
(Closed) Nonconformance B (81-01):
Failure to properly qualify the auditor who performed Audit No. 155 (Records) on September 18, 1980, as required by Section 18 of the NES QA Manual 80A9002.
The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, the deficiency was actually due to the auditor not being properly identified in the audit report as only a team member and not the lead auditor.
The specific training requirements of paragraph 18.3.3 apply only to lead auditors.
To clarify the record, an addendum dated January 7, 1982, identifying the audit team members was attached to Audit No.155.
To prevent recurrence, a standardized audit report format that identifies all audit team members was adopted in August 1981.
Review l
L
r
\\
ORGANIZATION:
NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
I NES DIVISION DANBURY, CONNECTICUT REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900762/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 6 of Audit No. QAA-182, which was applicable to an audit performed on August 21 and 24, 1981, verified that the new format was being used.
3.
(Closed) Nonconformance C (81-01):
Failure to require that Supplier Nonconformance Reports (SNR), dealing with nonconforming items the supplier dispositioned as " Repair" or "Use-as-is," identify the cause of the nonconformance and the corrective action.
Also, failure of the QA Manager's related supplier audits to show that complete compliance with SNR disposition and corrective action had been accomplished and verified as required by NES Procedure No. 80A9008.
The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, the supplier in question (Metal Products Corporation) was notified in writing on January 5,1982, that NES would accept only those SNR's which met the requirements of Procedure No. 80A9008.
To prevent recurrence, paragraph 5.0 of Procedure No. 80A9008 was revised to clarify that the intent of supplier audits was to spot check compliance with SNR dispositions and corrective action, and that the spot checks shall be documented in audit trip reports.
Review of Audit No. QAA-195 dated April 14-15, 1982, verified that a spat check was made of SNR's at Metal Products Corporation.
i 4.
(Closed) Nonconformance D (81-01):
Failure by NES to determine that their suppliers' welding procedure specifications (WPS) permitted unqualified changes in ASME Section IX Code essential variables.
The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, the two NES/Selamco WPS's in question were revised and one was requalified.
Of the three Metal Products Corporation WPS's in question, one was deleted from the work and the other two were revised and requalified.
To prevent recurrence, NES/Selamco contracted in December 1981 for a welding consultant's services to aid in reviewing all current and future WPS's.
In addition, an NES design engineer and a QA engineer were given formal training in welding.
5.
(Closed) Nonconformance E (81-01):
Failure by the Project Engineer to issue a Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) as early as practical for the La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR) project as required by the NES QA Manual 80A9002.
l
ORGANIZATION:
NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
NES DIVISION DANBURY, CONNECTICUT REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900762/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 6 The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, paragraph 2.4.2 of the QA Manual 80A9002 was revised on March 31, 1982.
This change defined that a QAPP will be prepared for a project when it is determined by the QA Manager and Project Manager that project customer QA and quality requirements are in excess of QA manual require-ments.
If no QAPP is determined to be required, work will be performed in accordance with the QA manual and implementing procedures.
Review verified that an NES QAPP for the North Anna, Units 1 and 2 spent fuel rack project was approved on April 7, 1982.
6.
(Closed) Nonconformance F (81-01):
Failure by the Task Engineer to meet the requirements of the Design Calculation Notebook Procedure No. 80A9004 for Task No. 5101-052, LACBWR Project.
The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, all of the calculations with identified deficiencies were reviewed as shown in the update record of the Calculation Notebook for Task Force No. 5101-052
( LACBWR).
This review was performed to assure that the inclusion of all the requirements of Procedure No. 80A9004 were met.
To prevent recurrence, the applicable parts of Procedure No. 80A9004 were revised on February 4, 1982,.to further define requirements for calculations.
Also, a retraining program for engineering personnel was conducted on February 19, 1982, on the requirements of the Calculation Notebook Procedure.
7.
(Closed) Nonconformance G (81-01):
Failure to have an independent check performed of a battery charger anchorage calculation prior to issuing the approved design sketch SK-5101-063-7 as required by the Design Calculation Notebook Procedure No. 80A9004.
l The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, the above calculation was checked on October 22, 1981, and found to be accurate as shown on page 14 of the Calculation Notebook for Project / Task 5101-053 (LACBWR).
To prevent recurrence, a retraining program for engineering personnel was conducted on February 19, 1982, on the requirements of the Calculation Notebook Procedure.
l
r ORGANIZATION:
NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
NES DIVISION DAN 8URY, CONNECTICUT REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900762/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 6 8.
(Clused) Nonconformance H (81-01):
Failure to perform several elements of administrative control for code files ANSYS and KENO-IV as required by the Computer Code Documentation Control Procedure No. 80A9010.
The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, the code files for ANSYS and KENO-IV were reviewed and brought up-to-date on October 30, 1981, in order to meet the requirements of Procedure No. 80A9010.
To prevent recurrence, paragraphs 3.0 and 4.0 of Procedure No. 80A9010 were revised on March 3,1982, to clearly identify administrative controls applicable to code files.
A file usage log and signout cards were also developed and implemented.
9.
(Closed) Nonconformance I (81-01):
Failure to assure that all key staff and technical personnel attended training sessions as required by the QA Manual Nos. 80A9002 and 80A9021.
The NRC inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letter dated January 12, 1982, two general QA training sessions were conducted on December 18 and 21, 1981, for Danbury office engineering, inservice inspection (ISI), and QA services personnel.
The records of indoctrination and training for 42 field NDE inspectors were reviewed by the QA Manager.
A review was also made of all newly-hired ISI personnel, and a memorandum dated April 20, 1982, was issued concerning their QA Manual 80A9021 required attendance for general QA training.
10.
(Closed) Nonconformance J (81-01):
Failure to provide recertification requirements for nondestructive testing personnel in NES Procedure No. 99-CNTP-001 in accordance with the requirements of SNT-TC-1A (June 1975 Edition).
The NRC inspector determined through additional review of this subject, that NES Procedure No. 99-CNTP-001 is in conformance with the requirements j
of SNT-TC-1A (June 1975 Edition) concerning recertification of NDE personnel.
This item is not considered a nonconformance.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
10 CFR Part 21:
The NRC inspector reviewed the vendor's document, " Procedure for Compliance with 10 CFR Part 21," Specification No. 80A9036 dated
ORGANIZATION:
NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
NES DIVISION DAN 8URY, CONNECTICUT REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900762/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 6 of 6 December 12, 1977, in order to verify that adequate documented measures are available with respect to the evaluation and reporting requirements of 10 CFR Part 21.
A notice to employees which included Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 was observed posted on an employee bulletin board.
Within this area, no violations of 10 CFR Part 21 requirements were identified.
e u
. _ _ _... =. -
~ ~-
w--
I !
Docket No.PPF67dZ Inspector
- E 6#or R: port No.fe-v/
O Scope / Module 5-/ad/5 af Hawaks Page
/ of 5 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 7n.ccpcfih.
Fin //>rpr i
J l
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
9 Fe/hisp #ES G7 f Mswa/c,si io a rY <
A
't) 9t?k Prez, c5,o e ra/
ciY,3rr9-r2 P-Ez-G e es rez/
2,,sa,~ r, %n ck
- 6) ffs PGd'C
. 9A Ser w c>=r 2-.
P c A-c/c//s7' recel/cf Z<>forna ( S~yc/s.m.c A c/o W
- -w-62 Ac4.
-3 9
/Th>rer</ of' /9/2,4cid*/ fcArc/b4c 4'
d'
/W8x/$sn> W /thron/c&c/cb/WF Sd/L/P/% &cW/l/rr PAA-/KS
/ -7 rfz-
- A s
7 Sfai,cfar,/ prina/fer Acad/ / Pen,fs G
9 A ci d / /> L a 7 1 z/o-GrA-Af.::. h%iec/ Cw4 f)v-sr/Jx p', s e
v f
f$fdf $$k frW OfifYYCf c/ Y V A "llY*Z.
'f f
f MS'Scbnsna ro f/cNC, a/ Gtkn1 r/iff C/-/ fcip-//fb cfr We rA-1-r-r.t a n.
7
~7
' f/ES h>#2y fo /Yeft/ /%>c/c/c fs $cYre < n, Jrp SAfde b
/-S~-22.
AsA i
//
/
FeHm /oc MPC '.:
S*## 's rN/sec/.L, A'bC c M #c'. 356e) - (2) Ma
- 38f~4' ), n/M) ihu. ' 4cr(/P.)
Krr/rv.r
.^&B.
//
3 A7/'C' 5-A-/&wAs-irip/dhe ornmofires 7"asucedre c7 cia /]-
./
j<
/
/
Fi ea fra n re" cards G) 14/pg e 4 37
't 4-fe4-cf d nr //Joc.
~
6t) WPS No 233-c f vrp/a cw bO 3 7-4.)
- / /~'P.f A'2 7-sz)
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable
m m,- _ m -._ _. _
- --=v-7 Dockit No.Pnec761 Inspector _
- '.E, C//er
~,/"
I Report No.p2-ce i-Page It of 5 Secpe/ Module 5fa/a r c/ /%r 'v.v5 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED I/>rpee/%h /~/or c//n er 1
/
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
//(ccaf)
~3 (ccdd cg) Ae. wtr os.2/9-/o y st;;p f/-
7.ge.)
l1-
'3 FClko - n er A/ES/J A /e7/>, cc s.v,esj+- S'G'st' [
O
^'# b w - o r N.
oqW'Aiv. o6'o Pz -gc 2 s-zS-S 2.
T' s
- 6) No.427
-f
&& AS O /c/2 GC 7 sc-29 75>
/3' 7
- ES/Selomcc /e//ev fo #ES PAMae9pr ec>rce r/r/is9 Ai!/bc cl'a we//sseL~ e cm.s c///er ie f -
2-//-9s
- A.
/H
.5
- ffhrs-/as,, re.
A c. Aso. S - r /2 2 G 3 ec w /47 e.<rej 'sira cencv %tsw, </ce
evz lS Ne' rerc/S of~ We///. orc 7' sve/efserope Yro+, Mr rs.s cws
- io'desv>,eno// der carre t-o ld 9'
farrerkh z h. 2.
-} VdP7 d'rsf ') o e2 cove ri >n a; e<
~ FA lr' e ie,c / s%g ram g-P-f2 6
/7 p
c,,,,,?,q,,,,, c.; /,933 pg pp j=,,
,fi,,,g g,,,,a 7 g.c 3 c
Fue/ Hache Pre r 'e ef 9 P z.
A;c/st ll T
Aos/c>, ler/reidt$rE /Vodi>dec-/r 00rWc/n= d17AFG6'it y.4r-22
'S'
/9 3'
Ca /'co/c7l< c's /(&kfe,oh-E e '7;F rf if/c - E~/ CJ - O S % {f.d cr3 nn) g -z'.42 AM 20 d'
~~fYdinhre Ee' card'r 3Gr A/ES f>r etriee"hx; Ra rs e >irre/ cr >,
n'epc/ir$/>,en/r of r~a/c' c/Arnh / a/e/boh-f+ocr>aGire 2-/F42 M4 V
. Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Speci fication 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicablo
- spector g, g. cr//p /
Dock 2t No,<?Pho762 n
Report No.82-ci iopa/ Module JW/vr cr,Frgre'oc/f Page 3 cf _5 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED f
Ihspeenda Fin o ts,_s-
/
I 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 2/
3
/f'ev's& o, /<r c'f Be 7Yery [/eree c'~e;fc v/a7Gh>, Afr/pl>oo/r fe, Pr$' c//7asJ-S7h/-Cl3 /z /rc'd'we)
/"-2 2-E' MA -
1e
'l 22-
,P A~p' rer$s cc nr>>,c s 7f-C=> m o u 6 r of-s Af D s~f5 2' /rf/VO-/r ij dc 0//'o/V.s*!
- 6) AfafA=r GoG-4 is /s torres/
AsA G / (c.c/p j:,/,. yg /,,
n (3) Ve>r f a ca fici, st%g ry's l
I 3~/f/G-/V '9a' ircin/
[4]
f
~
f) Usaep Acys G
n (2).Smk eff' C' erd
- i 23 3
f're e PEcste Edd/ /O [cnwcs/pr Mf daecisnn/a/reh.
W Ce nfra/
S.7-82 2,
24' f
sf'erera's of' 4 A 77enutw
/z.-zi-g/
su 7
25 6
NES Mein e rasi/c%
u>> redn /A->r in s/r2r e fec~,, s fn ZS*Z J2prson A e/ P/9 L Y/r/ n a //rx -/fya ist %
/-r-S 2-Ad S
AFS Elem e em Z/7clee fem a /rfs, ofS'2 fff Zo hi=> clers 3-/S 4 2-
\\
2 '*?
Aff A f r!?r r o >r Genera / Z/icloc4rwrabc>; '6 Tva'>rtNc OAdde s e-rronoe /
so -/P-6'z d
fev.ZS.Z o
D'ocument Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document
~
4 QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (.If applicable)
ll 2
)a
, Y /
r l
w/u e
b b
a i
m c
y f. g y
u i
N l
A mnnp tt p o3f 4
F NNo eeea A
t mm I uuf ttcry c c I.
, ko l oo(
,cp 1
ADD o: :
i n
DRg 9
tffo P-nooi a
e s
P 2
ueei s q p t. v 3
f neyae mSTDR u
'l lo C1234 l
p o
?
t s
/
ri u
c t
5_
l r
p w
s h
'z y
c e
s r
y f o J p h 9-a
/
mI
/,
D E
N T
0 2
/
C r
M E
/
a
/
A J
/
5
/
Tr X
B E
U 4 2 S
S
/
f d
T E
e N
L w /
9h E
T
)y M
I
'6 h
//e r
U T
i
/
a C
O s
/
r e
s D
f P
r e
c o
9 V
P e
n
/
C r>
c f C
p f
S i
A o
-y y,
f r
ro f
d em i
c r
de c
/u rM e
i 0
p Wp r
4 P
el S
r e
r sa
(
M w M e
)
n s d'+
anr c
n h rer i
cet e v
s f
rtth r
N unet T
e J
t n
i f 0 M h z
5678 f
A a
- _ H, s
i G
f n
s c
o e
i 2
E lu s
t
>s e
ael a
c /
8 p
cra 2
2 ygi uu T.
f 2
Tnfdn S
7 iiea t wccM naeo e
1 erprA u
mDSPQ r
d u
9 o
o c
t H
l o
e e
2 2
'D 1 234 c
/
1 p
p s
o n
c I
l
- l, 5.
1 t
r i
)
z e
~Xci r
l e
b
'a b
a f2 m
c u
i P8 M
N l
/.
tt p mnnp oo 4
eeea NN t mm tt I uuf
- r c c I.
k o l oo(
cp ADD 7)-
, oe i
n tffo DR nooi 2
e s
ueei
/-
sqpt v 3
neyae 1
mSTDR u
s l
i'
~
o C1234 m
A A<d
//
V A
P I
r v
/
e
/
r s
WcE e
p r s 7 r
c /n o f
>c s
o,b
/
r
's e,
r
/
f s
w 2
c
(
g D
o / f E
r S
N T
c c
I C
c, f
M E
A A
Z+
A J
X B
e s
E U
r<
e S
s S
/
- c. dc
/c T
E N
L E
T r
a
)
r e
M I
A y
s.
7 r
U T
i c
,- /c 2
/
/
r a
C O
v 7
s c
D r
s P
y
e, 4 /
e o
o c
P" S
/s"d en
/
y m/
i g
f i
'f n
.h o
y r
s ro f
e g
em i
de c
S p
C rM e
0 p
3 c
el S
r 0
e, Ea sa
(
r t
anr
/
h rer n 7 (p
n 'e q
cet e
/p A n s unet r /
rt th
/
z p
PILO c 6 p
, f n
M,
'y
/u /
e E
r 5678 e
A p
/p
/
ts 0
r n
o e
i s
t f.
3 C
e ael p
cra a
2 ygi uu f
/
Tnfd n iiea t wccM e
erprA naeo l
u mDSPQ r
d u
o o
c t
M
/
o...
Z
'D 1 234 c
/
1 e
e p
p s
o
_~
n c
i l
+!,
f,1i l
j!
!;t
,l
r
[
PERSONS CONTACTED
/
Dates l#
O'O Company J f$ Di ViS/ G)1 88 MM/"r Docket / Report No. fff##782 [82-#/
Inspector Page [ of l X AV/enf>/ fx;f fiepf,,,y NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
A W, 6kr //
SB9 E>w nrefr AffS Di visien J
T-ke f / /e r Mariager,.s;, rf,c/>,s Ana/w i.c
/
/'
J N, l a rse e Sr. V,2 Esar. Servire S Wo /Yo/i to f%esids,/
F' lor *//'t1M S Tv-Sr. SCR 4 rec 4 j!V, y g7A Mg iAcf;,c
S Z weer Air e c 'A7 7, flery fp// ire J
t
-