ML20028C385
| ML20028C385 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/05/1983 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML100980208 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301100028 | |
| Download: ML20028C385 (5) | |
Text
.
1 4
A SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION FOR CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMFANY INDIAN POINT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT INTRODUCTION General Design Criteria 1 and 4 specify that safety-related electrical equipment in nuclear facilities must be capable of performing its safety-related function 'under environmental conditions associated with all normal, abnormal, and accident plant operation.
In order to ensure complicance with the criteria, the NRC staff required all licensees of operating reactors to submit a re-evaluation of the qualification of safety-related electrical equipment which may be exposed to a harsh environment.
BACKGROUND On February 8,1979, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement (IE) issued to all licensees of operating plants (except those included in the systematic evaluation program (SEP)) IE Bulletin (IEB) 79-01, " Environ-mental Qualification of Class IE Equipment." This Bulletin, together with IE Circular 78-08 (issued on May 31, 1978), required the licensees
~
to perform reviews to assess the adequacy of their environmental qualifica-tion programs.
On January 14, 1980, NRC issued IE Bulletin 79-018 which included the D0R guidelines and NUREG-0588 as attachments 4 and 5, respectively.
Subsequently, on May 23, 1980, Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21 was issued and stated the 00R guidelines and portions of NUREG-0588 form the requirements that licensees must meet regarding environmental 9301100028 830105 gDRADOCK 05000247 PDR
- qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in order to satisfy those aspects of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion (GDC) 4.
Supplements to IEB 79-01B were issued for further clarification and
. definition of the staff's needs.
These supplements were issued on February 29, September 30, and October 24, 1980.
In addit' ion, the staff issued orders dated August 29, 1980 (amended in September 1980) and October 24, 1980 to all licensees.
The August order
, required that the licensees provide a report, by November 1, 1980, docu-menting the qualification of s,afety-related electrical equipment. The l
l October order required the establishment of a central file location for 5
the maintenance of all equipment qualification recofds.
The central file was mandated to be established by December 1, 1980.
The staff subsequently issued Safety Evaluation Reports (SERs) on enviromental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment to licensees of all operating plants in mid-1981.
These SERs directed licensees to "either, provide documentation of the missing qualification information i
which demonstrates that safety-related equipment meets the D0R Guide-
]
lines or NUREG-0588 requirements or commit to a corrective action
{
(re qualification, replacement (etc.))."
Licensees were required to respond to NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.
In response to the staff SER issued May 21, 1981, the licensee submitted additional
(
information regarding the qualification of safety-related electrical I
equipment.
i I
r l
l I
l l
n
,n.------
n-,
,-,-e-,--.
n.--
,--,-o n,
i,
EVALUATION The acceptability of the licensee's equipment environmental qualification program was reviewed for the Division of Engineering by the Franklin ~
Research Center (FRC) as part of the NRR Technical Assistance Program in support of NRC operating reactor licensing actions.
The consultant's review is documented in the rehort " Review of Licensees" Resolutions of Outstanding Issue's from NRC Equipment Environmental Qualification Safety o
Evaluation Reports," which is attached.
We have reviewed the evaluation pirformed by our consultant contained in the enclosed Technical Evaluation Report (TER) and concur with its bases and findings.
Our review has also revealed certain discrepancies in the TER which are being corrected by this SER as follows:
o Delete the third paragraph on page 1-9 of the TER.
o Delete the second paragraph on page 1-10 of the TER.
The staff has also reviewed the licensee's justification for continued operation regarding each item of safety-related electrical equipment identified by the licensee as not being capable of meeting environmental qualification requirements for the service conditions intended.
CONCLUSIONS Based on the staff's review of the enclosed Technical Evaluation Report and the licensee's justification for continued operation, the following conclusions are made regarding the qualification of safety-related elec-trical equipment.
? ~
4
-4 1.
Continued operation until completion of the licensee's environmental qualification program will not present undue risk to the public health and safety.
Furthermore, the staff is continuing to review the licensee's environmental qualification program.
If any additional qualification deficiencies are identified during the course of this review, the licensee will be required to reverify the justification for continued operation. The staff will re' view this information to ensure that continued operation until completion of the licensee's environmental qualification program will not present undue risk to the public health and safety.
The major qualification deficiencies that have been identified in the enclosed FRC TER (Tables 4-1, 4-2, 4-3 and 4-4) must be resolved by the licensee.
Items requiring special attention by the licensee are summarized below:
Submission of information within thirty (30) days for items in o
NRC categories IB, 2A and 28 for which justification for continued operation was not previously submitted to NRC or FRC, o Resolution of aging and qualified life deficiencies identified in Sections 4.3.1 and 5 of the FRC TER.
,c,
The licensee must provide the plans for qualification or replacement of the unqualified equipment and the schedule for accomplishing its proposed correction action.
1 PROPRIETARY REVIEW Enclosed in the FRC Technical Evaluation Report (TER) are certain identi-fied pages on which the information is claimed to be proprietary.
During the preparation of the enclosed TER, FRC used test reports and other docume,nts supplied by the licensee that included material claimed to be proprietary by their owners and originators'.
NRC is now preparing
'to publicly release the FRC TER and it is incumbent on the agency to seek review of'all claimed proprietary material.
As such, the licensee is requested to, review the enclosed TER with their owner or originator and notify NRR withi.n seven (7) days of receipt of this SER whether any portions of the identified pages still require proprietary protection.
If so, the licensee must c'learly identify this information and the specific rationale and justification for the protection from public disclosure, detailed in a written response within twenty (20) days
~
of receipt of this SER.
The level of specificity necessary for such continued protection should be consistent with the criteria enumerated in 10 CFR 2.790(b) of the Commission's regulations.
P
_.. _, - -,,