ML20028C330

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Responds to 821008 & 1210 Requests for Deletion of Tech Spec 3/4.3.4 Re Turbine Overspeed Protection for Periodic Surveillance Testing & Insp of Turbine Valves.Decision on Request Will Not Be Made Prior to Completion of Review
ML20028C330
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 12/30/1982
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Clayton F
ALABAMA POWER CO.
References
TAC-48973, TAC-52539, TAC-53434, NUDOCS 8301070342
Download: ML20028C330 (3)


Text

s j

DISTRIBUTION j

Docket i

NRC PDR I

DEC 3 0 1982 L pon NSIC Docket No. 50-364 ORB #1 Rdg DEisenhut 0 ELD JMTaylor "r.

F. L. Clayton ELJordan Senior Vice President ACRS-10 Alabana Power Company CParrish Post Office Box 2641 EReeves Birminghan, Alabana 35291 BDLiaw WJohnston i

Dear ttr. Clayton:

Gray j

We have completed a preliminary review of your anendment request for Joseph ti. Farley linit No. 2 dated October 8,1982, supplenented by letter dated Decenber 10, 1982. You requested deletion of the Technical Specifications (3/4.3.4 Turbine Overspeed Protection) for periodic surveillance testing and inspections of turbine valves. The bases for this requirement is to ensure that turbine overspeed protection instrumentation and turbine speed control valves are operabl'e and will protect the turbine from excessive overspeed. This letter is in response to your request.

In your October 8,1982 proposal, your staff concluded that the potential to generate a turbine missile from a turbine overspeed condition is well below the NRC criteria, is ineffective and without cost benefits. You also concluded that " Technical Specification 3/4.3.4 can be deleted without an adverse inpact on the reliability of the turbine overspeed protection systen or without a reduction in overall plant safety."

Un have initiated action to obtain a detailed safety review of your contention that the weekly turbine valve testing is un. justified for Farley Unit No. 2.

He currently estinate the review would require about one year to complete.

Sone of our reasons for the lengthly schedule are as follows:

1.

This issue, the probability of turbine nissile generation, concerns j

turbine nanufacturers in addition to Westinghouse. Our staff is in the process of resolving the issue generically. Specifically, technical reports describing nethods and procedures for calculating design speed and destructive overspeed nissile generation probabili-l ties have been submitted to us by the Westinghouse Stean Turbine Division and are currently under review. These reviews are scheduled for coepletion within a year. The results will be directly applicable to Farley Unit No. 2 in that they will establish acceptable method:

for a,etting revised inspection and test schedules and procedures for essentially all Westinghouse turbine governor and overspeed protection systens.

8301070342 821230 PDR ADOCK 05000364 P

PDR l

l l.e~~~o m

hnc ronu m oo-so acu oso OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom ini-mm

~

F. L. Clayton ;

2.

Your staff requests deletion of Technical Specification 3/4.3.4 arguing that accidental trips and refueling shutdowns satisfactorily demonstrate the operability of the turbine overspeed protection systen. However, this is not consistent with the current " Functional Test Requirenents for fluclear Turbines" supplied to customers by the liestinghouse Stean Turbine Division.

3.

Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systens Report, WCAP-10161, used to support the request, requires extensive interaction with the manufacturer and cannot be completed on your requested schedule. Prior to conpleting our review we do not have an adequate basis to reach a decision on your your request. We propose to use HCAP-10161 in conjunction with our review of the Westinghouse qeneric reports on this issue.

In view of the above, we will not be in a position to decide on your request prior to completion of your generic review. Should you desire to appeal this decision, please advise the assigned NRC Project Manager.

Sincerely, Oricir.a1 signer w.

S. A. varga Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing cc: See next page f ^[V' h8b d

e 9

Ijl

/

/1 D

,,7 NCM,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,ADj,M,gE,h,,,,, D E,,,

/0R,,,DL,,,,,

...9.RB#1,3 (h

omcc, Ekeev9 jm gt BDLiaw b WJohnston RVo er

.G ainas SUINAME)

I

...12/J. /82 1

82 12/, 82 12/)."/. 8. 2........1 2...../...........12/Q../.82 DATE)

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam m -mm mc FORM 318 OMy NRCM ONO

Mr. F. L. Clayton, Jr.

Alabama Power Company cc: Mr. W. O. Whitt Executive Vice President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Ruble A. Thomas, Vice President Southern Company Servir.es, Inc.

Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Geor'ge F. Trowbridge, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D. C.

20036 Robert A. Buettner, Esquire Balch, Bingham, Baker, Hawthorne, Williams and Ward Post Office Box 306 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 24-Route 2 Columbia, Alabama 36319 Mr. R. P. Mcdonald Vice President - Nuclear Generation Alabama Power Company P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator - Region II U. S. Nuclear F egulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 l

i

-