ML20028C295

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Repts 50-010/82-16,50-237/82-23 & 50-249/82-23 on 820904-1001.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20028C295
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/1982
From: Spessard R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20028C296 List:
References
NUDOCS 8301070304
Download: ML20028C295 (2)


See also: IR 05000010/1982016

Text

e

'

s

DEC 2 21982

Docket No. 50-10

Docket No. 50-237

Docket No. 50-249

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN:

Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. T. M. Tongue,

M. J. Jordan, and S. Stasek of this office during the period of September 4

through October 1, 1982, of activities at Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units

1, 2, and 3, authorized by NRC Operating Licenses No. DPR-02, DPR-19, and DPR-25

and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. D. J. Scott and others of your

staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the

course of this inspection; however, a deficiency in operating practices was

observed which we consider to be significant. The deficiency was that your

control room operations staff was defeating the audible alarm function for

the plant process computer for Unit 2 by wedging an electrical connector in

the alarm acknowledge button. This action compromises the operator's ability

to respond conservatively to instrument indications. Although no safety

related alarms were rendered inoperable as a result of this action, this

action is indicative of poor operating habits. We request you respond in

writing to this office within thirty days of the date of this letter with

'a description of your corrective actions to prevent recurrence of this item.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information

that you (or your contractors) believe to be exempt from disclosure under

10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by tele-

phone within ten (10) days from the date of this letter of your intention

8301070304 821222

PDR ADOCK 05000010

0

PDR

l2:E?C)/

,

m

.

.

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within twenty-five (25) days

from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold

such information.

If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that

less than seven (7) days are available for your review, please notify this

office promptly so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with

Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit

executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part

sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons which

are the bases for the claim that the information should be withheld from public

disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with speci-

ficity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought

to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part

of the affidavit.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the speci-

ficd periods noted above, a copy of this letter, the enclosures, and your

response to this letter will be placed in the Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice) are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

f*r

R. L. Spessard, Director

Division of Project and

Resident Programs

Enclosures:

1.

Inspection Report

i

No. 50-10/82-16(DPRP);

l

No. 50-237/82-23(DPRP);

and No. 50-249/82-23(DPRP)

cc w/encls:

Louis 0. Dc1 George, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

D. J. Scott, Station

Superintendent

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector, RIII

Karen Borgstadt, Office of

Assistant Attorney General

RIII

RIII

RIII

R$AL'.

W

W yse

ddiker/jp

Streeter

Spbssard

12/17/82

l%

43./y