ML20028B218
| ML20028B218 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1982 |
| From: | Baynard P FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 3F-1182-30, GL-82-22, NUDOCS 8211300178 | |
| Download: ML20028B218 (2) | |
Text
9
.c
~ >..
es,o yby:
- c. ',,
?;m,.
.q-]
e i.e
- p
. ;,.y M
Pow ce......e,r November 24,1982
- 3F-il82-30 File: 3-0-3-a-3 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Crystal River Unit 3 Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Generic Letter No. 82-22 Congressional Request for Information Concerning Steam Generator Tube Integrity l
l
Dear Mr. Eisenhut:
Florida Power Corporation (FPC) has received and reviewed the subject letter.
Attached is the questionnaire which summarizes the questions of and responses for Representative Markey.
FPC has always submitted the information required by 10CFR20.407 and Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) Technical Specification 6.9.1.5.a. In addition, CR-3 has experienced no steam-generator induced problem that has lead to significant dose to our personnel nor has any routine steam generator inspection (and resultant corrective action) caused an extension to an outage at CR-3.
Very truly yours, k
Dr. Patsy Y. Baynard Assistant to Vice President Nuclear Operations RMB:mm cc:
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection & Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30303 g[
8211300178 821124 i
PDR ADOCK 05000302 P
PDR General Office 320 Tn.rty-fourtn street soutn. P O Box 14042, st Petersburg, Fionda 33733 813-866 5151
e U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Approved by OME 3150 0092 e
STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED - QUESTIONNAIRE
- RESPONSE BY YEAR 1979 1980 1981 1982 HOW MANY DAYS OF UNSCHEDULES OUTAGES CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO 0
1 0
0 STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED DIFFICULTIES PER YEAR AT YOUR SITE?
DURING EACH OF THE YEARS IN QUESTION, HOW MANY STEAM GENERATOR Only Leaker TUBES HAVE BEEN 0
2 1
0 PLUGGED IN EACH STEAM GENERATOR?
SLEEVED IN EACH STEAM GENERATOR 7 0
0 0
0 WHAT HAVE BEEN THE TOTAL COSTS AND SPECIFICALLY REPLACEMENT POWER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STEAM GENERATOR MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT AT YOUR PLANT 7 0
0 0
0 WHAT HAS BEEN THE TOTAL OCCUPATIONAL RADI ATION EXPOSURE (IN Bubble PERSON-REMS) CAUSED BY STEAM GENERATOR Test MAINTENANCE?
0 98.69 27.574 0
FPC does not break down any further Not Not Not Not REPAIR / REPLACEMENT? than Soecial Maintenance Avail.
Avail Avail. Avail.
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ANNUAL' EMPLOYEE DOSE HAS BEEN ATTRIBUTABLE TO STEAM GENERATOR RELATED WORK AT YOUR SITE (S)?
0 17%
5%
0 DURING THE YEARS IN QUESTION HOW MANY WORKERS HAVE RECEIVED MEASUREABLE RADIATION DOSES:
FOR STEAM GENERATOR RELATED WORK?
0 159 55 0
(
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL WORKFORCE. DO THESE WORKERS REPRESENT?
0 9.2%
2.7%
0 TOW MANY TEMPORARY WORKERS (defined by the NRC as all workers other than those hired directly by nuclear power plants on a conventional, long-term basis) RECEIVED DOSES FROM STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED WORK AT YOUR FACILITY EACH YEAR?
0 109 40 0
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WORKERS INVOLVED WITH STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED WORK DO TEMPORARY WORKERS, REPRESENT 7 0
68%
63%
0 THE TOTAL WORKFORCE DO TEMPORAF 10RKERS REPRESENT?
0 6. 3".
1.9%
0 HAS YOUR COMPANY USED INDEPENDENT FIRMS TO FIND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE RECEIVED AN OCCUPATIONAL DOSE FROM STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED WORK?
N0 NO M
M 10 YOU ANTICIPATE MAJOR STEAM GENERATOR REPAIRS IN ANY OF YOUR UNITS IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, AND IF SO HOW MUCH WOULD THESE REPAIRS COST, PLEASE SPECIFY.
Do not anticipate major S/G Repairs in the next five (5) years.
The responses are based on steam generator work that is related to steam-generator-induced problems.
(
.