ML20027A899
| ML20027A899 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/26/1982 |
| From: | Crane C FRANKLIN INSTITUTE |
| To: | Le N NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027A898 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-03-79-118, CON-NRC-3-79-118, FOIA-82-544 IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, TER-C5257-466, NUDOCS 8209020228 | |
| Download: ML20027A899 (729) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. . Moose Send Copy of XA to PDR
. TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES .
FROM NRC EOUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION '
! SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (F-11 and B-60)
NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT. UNIT 1 VOL. 1 0F 2
- n - n ~_ =-.
NRC DOCKET NO. 50-220 FRC PROJECT C5257 NRC TAC NO. 42476 FRC ASSIG?iMENT 13 NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79-118 FHC T/.SK 466 Prepared by Franklin'Research Center 20th and Race S'treets Philadelphia, PA 19103 FRC Group Leader: C. J. Crane
. . ~
~~'
Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Lead N'RC Engineer: N.,B. Le P. She=anski-August 26, 1982 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or Implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, appa-ratus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rf gMs. Reviewed by: Approved by: c4up teader epy
. # Department firecth _
9( -
/ Moose Send Copy d yA to PDR sA, 10 j QO
# #" 00. Franklin Research Center
- A Division of The Franklin Institute The Ben armn Frana.Ln Peru.sy. PNta.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 8000 J -
E 4 TE R-C5257-466 b. CONTENTS Section Title Page 1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 . 1.1. Purpose of the Evaluation . . . . . . . .. 1-1 1.2 Scope of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . . 1-1
' l.3 Generic Issue Background. . . . . . - . . . 1-2 1.4 Specific Issue 3ackground . . . . . . . . 1-10 2 NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION . . . . . 2-1 2.1 Criteria Provided by the NRC. . . . . . . .- 2-1 2.2 Staff Positions and Supplemental Criteria . . . . 2-1 2.2.1 Requirements and Applicable Criteria . . . . 2-1 2.2.2 Application of Requirements and Criteria'to TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment . . . 2-3 2.2.3 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review . . . . . . . .. . . . 2-4 2.2.4 Clarification of Qualification Fequirements . . 2-5 2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qualification Requirements . . . . . . . . . . 2-8
', 3 METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE tVALUATION . . . . . . . 3-1
, 3.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 .
- 3.2 Me thodology . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 3.3 NRC Qualification Categories and Definitions. . . . 3-8
, 3.4 Dnplementation Guide for Fuifilling NRC Criteria. . . 3-12 I 4 TECHNICAL EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
.' 4.2 Summary of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . 4-2 4.3 Methodology Used by the Licensee. . . . . . . 4-14 4.3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipmen't List. . 4-14 4.3.2 Containment Spray System . . . . . . . 4-18 f 4.3.3 Environmental Service Conditions . . . . . 4-19 ~
4.3.4 Submergence . . . . . . . . . . 4-22 i
- 4.3.5 Chemical Spray . . . . . . . . . 4-22 4.3.6 Aging and Qualified Life . . . . . . . 4-23 -
4 4.4 Equipment Environmental Qualification Evaluation. . . 4-28 , iii
^
af?DQ3
, UOhfFrankDn Research C enter a A o,~e a n. r w:u.
.A
~~
<?
-1
. . TER-C5257-466
.? ..
CONTENTS (Cont.) Section Title Page. 5 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
*I 6 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 6-1 4 .j AFPENDIX A - ENVIRON. ENTAL SER7 ICE CONDITICNS __
.s APPENDIX B - LISTING OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ,
, APPENDIX C - PLANT SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS AND DIEPLAY INSTRUMENTATION APPENDIX D - REVIEW OF LICENSES'S RESPONSE TO NRC EEQ SER CONCERNING JUSTIFICATION FOR INTERIM OPERATION _, APPENDIX E ~- REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
.j t
-1
.3 84 iv U.~ Franklin Research Center a w a w re.a
s 4
., TE R-C5257-466
. 5 -
-1 4
J i 4 FOREWORD This Technical Evaluation Report was prepared by Franklin Research Center under a contract with the U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission (Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Division of Operating Reactors) for technical assistance in. support of NRC operating redctor-licenring actions. The technical evaluation was conducted in accordance with criteria establi%ed by the NRC. Principal contributors to the technical preparation of this report were C. J. Crane, J. A. Murphy, K. E. Weise, D. J. Schmitz, and K. J. Iepson of the Franklin Research Center. T. J. DelGaizo from WESTEC Services, Inc. , R. Carrisen from ORFI . Systems, Inc , and M. A. Fedele from Evaluation Associates, Inc., also contributed to thes technical preparation .of this report through subcontracts with Franklin Research Center. - - . t d
,8
~ ~
E 1 .
, z.l
- i .
M v j
~
,,.. UNU Frank 5n Research Center
. A W et The F erm.an insonae
,, . , ~ . , . .g. y- .
y y -se - -- -- -- -----
v 4
..).
A i-
.j TER-C525 7-466 4
.}
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPRIETARY 'INFORMATION Some of the information in this technical evaluation report was 'obtained 1_ frota manufacturers' proprietary test reports. All proprietary test repo rts - t . are identified as such in Sectiotr 6; Refe.rences, of this report. Checksheets in Section- 4 containing. proprietary-information have been replaced with a di checksheet page stating that the proprietary information has been removed. ij d
'd
- ,.5s
. -;.~
- s,.
e
, ~
vii
- J'2 Franklin Research Center
.',- . a%amrm % .
e . \m
. < , ,' * ^
[
* ' ~ '
.. Y .I "
. s
TER-C5257-466< m
- 1. INTRODUCTION t
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION 1 The purpose of this report is to: ,
- o. evaluate licensees' resolutions of outstanding issues.related to
. . safety-related electrical equipment environmental qualification (EEQ)
~
discussed in the Nuclear Regulatory Cocsission (NRC)-Safety Evaluation Reports (SERs) in accordance with NRC criteria. The objective.is to identify all cases where a licensee's response has not resolved the significant qualification issues. o evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments in accordance with criteria established by the NRC and to identify (1) equipment for which qualification documentation is adequate, i.e., substantiates that the equipment is capable.of performing its specified design basis safety function when it is exposed to a harsh environment and (2) equipment for which qualification documentation is deficient, i.e., does not give reasonable assurance that the equipment is capable of' performing its specified safety function. o evaluate licensees' quali'fication documentation of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within' the scope 'of IE Bulletin 79-01B, Supplement 3 (item 2) [6],* in accordance with criteria established by the NRC in a manner identical to the i evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. [4 1.2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION J The scope of this report is limited to the evalu'ation of environmental qualification of electrical equipment that must function to mitigate the consequences of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) or high energy line break (RELB) and whose environment is adversely affected by that event.
*For References, see Section 6. Note that reference numbers are not presented in sequential order.
1-1
. ,__nk!!n
. n_Res
,ea_rch .'
.__ Center 1
. . _ _ . . _ _ . . . ._ ... _. .s . . .
TER-C5257-466 With respect to TMI Action Plan Implementation, the scope of thi:; report
.l is limited to those sections of NUREG-0737 [10] applicable to equipment having af ,
an installation implementation date of January 1,1981. Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January 1,1981 if adeqt.ately identified by the Licensee. 1 i The NRC has detemined that the evaluatien of environmental qualification of equipment items (1) l'cated o in plant areas whose environment is not adversely affected *.sy the design basis event (DEE) (e.g., equipment located in
'i "nild" environments) or (2) required to achieve and ma .rtnin cold shutdown, is not to be included within the scope of this report. However, where the
- Licensee has identified thesa equipment items in the EEQ submittals to the NRC, these items have been listed in NRC evaluation Category III.b in this report (see"Section 3 of this report for definition of NRC evaluation categories). -
Qualification aspects not included within the scope of this evaluation - are: i
, o seismic and dynamic qualification o equipment protection against natural phenomena
[," o equipment operational service conditions (e.g., vibratien, voltage, and frequency dcviationi.) o equipment located where it is subjected to the outdoor environment , l y.'. o equipment protection against fire hazards l
} 2 o equipment protection against missiles o equipment located in plant areas whose environment is not adversely
. ' .! affected by the' design basis event
-l o equipment required to achieve and maintain cold shutdown.
i i
,4 1.3 GENERIC ISSUE BACKCROUND Safety-related electrical equipment must be capable of performing design ..
.. safety functions under all normal, abnormal, and accident conditions. The
. purpose of equipment qualification is to provide tangible evidence that
~
equipment will operate on demand and to verify design performance, thereby
;, establishing assurance that the potential for cocmon-mode failure is minimized.,
#s 1-2
!!b~FrankEn a tw a m r n. . Resear.ch
- u. Center
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .=- e
1 i
?
TER-c5257-466 l { Of particular concern is the assurance that equipment will remain i operable during and following' exposure to the harsh environmental conditions (i.e., temperature, pressure, humidity [ steam], chemical sprays, radiation, and submergence) imposed as a result of a design basis accident. There harsh environments are generally defined by the limiting conditions resulting from the complete spectrum ot postulated break sizes, break locations, and single
. failures consequent to a- LOCA, main steam line break (MSLB) inside the reactor containment, or a HELB outside,the: reactor containment (such as a main steam i
; or feedwater line break). In addition, depending on specifie-plant design i features, other postulated HELB location.< may be associated with:
o tle chemical and volume control system (CVCS) letdown line o the steam supply piping to
- the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump turbine
- the reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) pump turbine
- the high pressure core injection (HPCI) pump turbine the isolation condenser
, _o steam generator blowdown.
The NRC criteria Nr reviewing the safety of nuclear power generating stations include the requirement that the qualification of safety-related
? elect.rical equipment be substantiated by auditable documentation of the .
. program that establishes the ability of the equipment to function as specified in the station design. This report is restricte'd to a ter.hnical evaluation of the equipment's ability to function in harsh environments resulting from DBEs.
Qualification criteria applied during the licensing of the older nuclear power plants have been modified over the years, and specific industry
~ ~
standards concerning qualification have been revised as the design of reactor systems has changed and as regulatory and operating experience has accumulated. Examples of such standards are IEEE . Standards 279-71, 323-74, 383-74, 317-76, 334-80, 381-77, 382-80, 535-79, 627-80, 649-80, and 650-79. NRC NUREG documents 0413 and 0588 have been developed to address this topic.
~
In particular, NUREG-0588 (published for comment in December 1979 and reisst ed as Revision 1 in July 1981) formally presented the NRC staff positions , regarding selected areas of environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in the resolution of General Technical Activity A-24 - e e -* *
. , =. e- =.
i. 9 I - . TER-C525 7-466 1 t
% " Qualification of Class IE Safety Related Equipment." The positions documented 71 therein are applicable to plan'es that are or will be in the construction permit or operating license review process.
']
Although qualification standards and regulatory requirements have
]
-f undergone considerable development, all of the currently operating nuclear
; power plants are required to comply with 10CFR50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria fo- Nuclear Power Plants, Section I, Criterion 4. This criterion states in part that " structures, systems and components important to safety
]
- shall be designed to accommodate the ef fects of and to he. compatible with the environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, testing and postulated accidents, including less-of-coolant accidents."
Qualification requirements are also embodied in (1) 10CFR50 Appendix A, General Design Criteria 1, 2, and 23 and (2) 10CFR50 Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and ruel Reprocessing Plants, Criteria III, " Design Control," and XI, " Test Control." There requirements
- _are applicable to safety-related equipment located outside as well as inside.
- containment.
. The NRC staf f has evaluated the licensees' equipment qualification programs by reviewing the qualification documentation of selected safety-related equipment as part of the operating license review for each plant. The NRC staff has also used a variety of methods to assure that these general
. requirements are met for electrical safety-related equipment. In the oldest 1
j plants, qualification was' based on the fact that electrical components were of
,j high industrial quality. After 1971, qualification was judged on the basis of a
' IEEE Std 323-71; however, no regulatory guide was issued adopting this standard. For plants whose SERs were issued af ter July 1,1974, the
'n, Commission issued Regulatory Guide 1.89, which in most respects adopted the i
.) .
most recent standard, IEEE Std 323-74.
- 1 In November 1977, the Union of Concerned Scientists petitioned the NRC 1 -
- Commissioners to upgrade current standaros for the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in operating plants. Subsequently, the ,
1 NRC staff instituted the Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) to determine the I degree to which the older operating nuclear power plants deviated from current - 1-4 4 - 0000 Frankhn Research Center w.( A o- a a N rr.ene. Il
,c *:
w
~
.s ;<
~ U TER-CS25 7-466 4 ' '
) licensing criteria. The subject of electrical equipment environ: ental
. d qualification (SEP Topic III-12) was selected for accelerated evaluation as
}
~
j part of this prograa. Seismic qualification of equipment was to be addressed
- as a seprate SEP topic. In December 1977, the NRC issued a generic letter to i 5
- ) all SEP p; ant licensees requesting that they initiate reviews to determine the-1 adequacy of existing equipment 'qualifica*. ion documentation.
. .- f .
-! Preliminary hdC review of licensee responses led to the preparation of
%m NUREC-0458, an interim NRC assessment of the environmental qualification of'
;y electrical equiement. This document concluded that "no signiTicant safety deficiencies requiring immediate remedial actions were identified." ' However,
' it was recocmended that additional effort should be devoted to examining the installation and environmental qudification documentation of specific i electrical equipment in all operating reactors.
On May 31, 1978, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE
-] Circular 78-08, " Environmental, Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical
'] Equ'ipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which required all licensees of aperating plants (except those included in the SEP) to examine their installed
,j safety-related electrical equipment and ensure appropriate qualification
! documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions.
,.] Subsequently, on February 8,1979, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforce-
,N ment issued IE Bulletin 79-01, t hich was intended to raise the threshold of IE
'4 .
J - Circular 78-08 to the level of Bulletin, i.e., action requiring a licensee J
j responses This Bulletin required a complete rc-review of the environmental
.f qualification of safety-related electrical equipment as described in IE'
,- Circular 78-08.
The review of the licensees' responses indicated certain deficiencies within 1 4 the scope of equipment addressed, definition of harsn environments, and adequacy
/]
'l of upport documentation. It became apparent that generic criteria were needed 3 for evaluating the electrical equipment environmental qualific.ation for both SEP
,I
~
ari non-SEP operating plants. Therefore, during the second half of 1979, the Division of Operating Reactors (DOR) of the NRC issued internally a document ,
*I entitled "Cuidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class IE Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors" [2]. (The document is hereafter .
.. . _nklin Rese_ arch Center en T e 4 r' w t r -
TER-C5257-466 referred to as the " DOR Guidelines.") The document was prepared as a screening standard for reviewing all operating plants, including SEP plant's. 7t was originally intended that the licensees evaluate their qualification documentation in accordance with the DOR Cuidelines. However, initi.nl NRC review of this documentatfun, which was compiled to rupport licensee submittals, revealed the need for obtaining independent evaluations and for accelerating the qualifi-cation review program. - In October 1979, the NRC awarded Franklin Research Center a contract to L
-.I provide assistance in the " Review and Evaluation of Licensing Actions for Operating Reactors," which included an assignment for review of equipment environmental qustification documentation under SEP Topic 111-12. The assign-ment was to review equipment environmental qualification documentation and to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for the'11
~
oldest plants (included in the SEP review). The plants included within the assignment were the Palisades, Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse, and Big ' Rock Point plants and Zion Station Units -I and 2, Indian- :, ' Point Units 2 and 3, Millstcne Unit 1, Dresden Unit '2, and San Onofre Unit 1. ' s.
~
(This assignment was completed in April 1981.) On January 14, 1980, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforceme,nt issued the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-01B, which expanded the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01 and requested additional information on environmental qualifica-tion of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities, excluding
-' the 11 facilities undergoing the SEP review. This Bulletin cited the DOR Guidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating the adequacy of the safety-
~
related electrical equipment qualification. The scope of the review vas expanded to include RELBs (inside and outside containment) in addition to J equipment aging and submergence. The GRC advised the licensees that the ,
. criteria contained in the DOR Guidelines would be used in its review of If licensee submittals; NUREG-0588 would be used as a guide in cases where the h DOR Guidelines do not provide sufficient detail. _
1 In early February 1980, the NRC decided that Indian Point Units 2 and 3 . and Zion Station Units 1 &nd 2 should be included within SEP Topic III-12 for the purpose of equipment savironmental qualification review. .
~ ~ ~ ~ .
. :k
.):
I
? TER-C525 7-466 '
4 w
' On February 21, .'980, the NRC and representatives of the SEP Plant Owners .
,; Croup held an open meeting at NRC headquarters to discuss an accelerated re. view j program in accordance with the DOR Guidelines.- Representatives of the, Indian
- Point Units and Zion Station also attended this meeting. The NRC formally issued to all licensees represented at the meeting the DOR Cuidelines document which included a second document, " Guidelines for Identification of That .
Safety Equipment of SEP Operating Reactors for Which Environmental I Qualification Is To*Be Addressed" [2), together with the request that the
. 's h
'i licensees review their plant systems and provide additional tquipment environ-mental qualification information to the NRC on an accelerated schedule.
For non-SEP plants, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement formed a task force including a principal reviewer in each region and a task leader from headquarters. The regiona-1 members were assigned responsibility for the technical review of the licensees' responses to IE Bulletin 79-01B, and the
- task leader was assigned responsibility for the overall coordination of the review effort with NRC staff.to assure overall consistency. The regional reviewers held meetings with.the licensees in their respective regions, which resulted in staff positions being issued in a supplement to IE Balletin 79-01B dated February 29, 1980. .
In April 1980, the NRC organizational structure was modifiad and the-q Equipment Qualification Branch was formed within the new Division of Engi-
! neering. Responsibility for reviewing the status of equipment qualification I
for all plants was assigned to this branch. On May 23, 1980, the NRC issued Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21 [7], specifying that licensees and applicants must meet the requirements. set forth f{ in the DOR Guidelines and NUREC-0588 regarding environmental qualification of 9 safety-related electrical equipment in order to satisfy 10CFR50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria, Section I, Criterion 4. This Order also established that t.he SERs on this subject, to be prepared by the NRC staff, must be issued
. on February 1, 1981 and that all subsequent actions to be taken by licensees
,i to achieve full compliance with the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 must be -
I completed no later than June 30, 1982. The Memorandum and Order established the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 as acceptable interpretations of the General
~
nklin Rese
-w,_ arch Center 1 . . -
TER-C525 7-466 Design Criteria for an interim period. Rulemaking was proposed for the purpose of establishing a permanent interpretation of the General Design
, Criteria.
The staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested parties during the week of July 13, 1980. The staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-01B, a response to significant questions raised during the public meetings, and two Orders. The Order dated May 30, 1980
, required the licensees to comply with the previously issued Ccesissicn q . Memorandum and Order of May 27, 1980 (CLI-84-21). The above orders required the licensees to complete the tasks identified in IE Bulletin 79-013 no later than November 1,1980 to allow the staff to comply with the February 1,1981 date imposed by the Commission Order. The responses to the questions were issued on February 29, 1980; and the second and third supplements to IE Bulletin 79-OlB, highlighting the staff positions af fecting the licensecs' responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24, 1980, respectively.
In October 1980, EG&G Idaho, Inc., awarded Franklin Research Center e contract to provide assistance in the equipment environmental qualification review for 13 of the plants whose licensees responded to IE Bulletin 79-01B. The assignment was to evaluate the licensees' equipment environmental'qualifi-cation sabmictals and to present the results in the fors of a Technical Evaluation Report for each plant. The objective of this Technical Evaluation Report was to review the licensees' submittals to determine if safety-related electrical equipment was reviewed for environmental qualification in accordance with the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 as required by IE' Bulletin 79-01B. The NRC was to perform an audit of the qualification documentation references as part of its Safety Evaluation Program. If discrepancies were found, the audit was to be extended. The plants included within this assignment were Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Millstone Unit 2, Salem Unit 1, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Brunswick Units 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Orasden Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1 and 2. (This assignment was completed in June - 1981.) In mid-1981, the NRC issued SERs on environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment to licensees of all operating plants. ~ A 1-8 Uiq00 Franidin Research Center A Dow=n.cn af The Frem5n Insurm
b d.
-g TE R-C5257-466
^I.
f f 6. 1
; Where adoicional qualification information was requi ed, the licenrees were
;. 3 directed to respord to the NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.
.i
'dn In May 1981, under the licensing action assistance contract, NRC
']
authorized Franklin Research Center to proceed with the re. view and evaluation
+ -j of the ensiironmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment
,C- located in harsh. environments, required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation .
on 71 operating plants.
..' j! . In July 1981, the NRC conducted extensive meetings with_Ihe nuclear Oj industry to address concerns and questions regarding qualification of safety-related equipment. In addition, the NRC provided licensees with detailed information with respect to the format and expected content of the licensees' .
90-day responses to the NRC SERs. Draft outlines of tne following proposed programs were also presented to the industry: environmental qualification of
,j equipment located in " mild" environments, seismic and dynam'c qualification, t and environmental qualification of mechanicai equipment.
.. -On September 23, 1981, the NRC Commissioners considered a petition (SECY-81-486) to extend 'the deadline for actions to be taken by licensees to
. achieve environmental qualificaticn of all safety-related equipment. On'
~
September 30, 1981, the NRC Commissioners extended this deadline to the second
,- j refueling outage af ter March 31, 1982.
1 In October 1981, the NRC authorized Franklin Research Center to include , 1 within the scope of the existing EEQ assignment .(1?CE Lessons Learned
.,j]
'. Implementation Equipment) the evaluation of licensees' resolutions of out-
. '.j standing issues related to equipment environmental qualification discussed in the NRC SERs in accordance with NRC criteria. Tha assignment was to review
~.j the qualification documentation and to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for 71 operating plants. (This report was devel-oped within the scope of this assignment.)
. On January 7,1982, the NRC Commissioners approved the issuance of the -
a .
' 'j proposed rule, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear *
}. Power Plants," for public comment. The proposed rule was published in the
[q Federal Register (Volume 47, No. 13) dated January 20, 1982. - 1-9 h Franklin Research Center g A ow w rr n.6%
- n. -- - - - -
~ ,
~
. . . . -s_,
TER-c5257-466
, In February 1982, Preposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1,89, *
" Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants,"
was issued for public comment. This regulatory guide was issued to (1) reflect current NRC positions on equipment qualification and (2) provide guidelines for meeting the NRC Co=missioners proposed rule on equipment qualification. The final rule, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for
- Nuclear Power Plants," vas subsequently issued on April 16, 1982 by the NRC (to be published in the Federal Register) to clarify and strengthen the criteria for environmental qualification of electrical equipment. - The final rule is to be incorporated into 10CFR50 as Section 50.49, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Wuclear "ower Plants." The significant features of the rule are:
o Requalification of electrical equipment in accordance with the rule - will not be required for equipment qualified or:being qualified in . a accordance with the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-013 or . . - S L: nu NUREG-0588, provided the qualification program. commenced within 90 :: r m -d!- days after the ef fective' date of th~e rule. ' o The requirement to qualify equipment needed to complete one path of achieving and maintaining a cold shutdown condition has been deleted. o A new section has been added, covering the qualification of equipment located in mild enviro' aments. o The Commission deadline for actions to be taken by licensees to achieve environmental qualification of all safety-related equipment is extended to the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982." On April 20, 1982, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter No.'82-U9 [8] to all licensees, presenting che NRC's position and clarification of certain aspects of the environmental qualification requirements. 1.4 SPECIFIC ISSUE BACKGROUND On May 31, 1978, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE , circular 78-03, " Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which raquired all licensees of operating - plaats to examine their installed safety-related altetrical equipment and nklin Research Center - m anrm m .
, + . , -
1 I! 1
*u
~
, TER-c525 7-466 ~
4 .I
; ensure appropriate qualification documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions. Subsequently, on February 8, 1979, the NRC-
>j Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Niletin 79-01, which was a
,; intended to raise the threshold of IE Circular '78-08 to the level of Bulletin, e
1 i.e., action requiring a licensee response. This Bulletin required a complete 1 j re-review of the environ = ental qualification of safety-related electrical
~i equipment as described in IE Circular 78-08.
- I
.k On January 14, 1980, t'ae NRC Office of Inspectioc and Enforcement issue'd d the DOR Cuidelines and IE Bulletin 79-OlB, which expanded tre~ scope of IE n
.j Bulletin 79-01 and requested additional infor=ation on environmental
} qualification of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities.
. This Bulletin cited the DOR Cuidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment qualification.
.I The NRC staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested
, 6 parties during the week of July 13, 1980. The staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-01B, a response to significant questions -raised during the public meetings, and two Orders. The Order dated May 30, 1980
, required the licensees to comply with the previously issued Com:nssion Memorandum and Order of May 27, 1980 (CLI-80-21). The above orders ~ required the licensees to complete the tasks identified in IE Bullet:a 79-013 no later
'.]
than November 1,1980 to allow the staff to comply with the February 1,1981 , 5 date imposed by the Commission Order. The responses to the questions were issued on February 29, 1980; and the second and third supplements to IE
, Bulletin 7S-OlB, highlighting the staff positions affecting the licensees'
- [' responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24,'1980, respectively.
L T The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement performed (1) a preliminary f- evaluation of the Licensee's response, documented in a technical evaluation report (TER) and (2) an onsite verification inspection (November 18-20, 1980)- of selected safety-related electrical equipment. Components of the '-
, ] containment spray, main steam isolation, and emergency cooling systems were
~
ins pec ted. The inspection verified proper installation of equipment, overall ,
.)
q interface integrity, location with respect to flood level for equipment inside the containment, and manufacturer's nameplate data. The =anufacturer's name - N 1-11 b Franklin Resesrch Center atv - a w r o m m.ein. ,
~
.J .. . _-
_ . . - ~_...._.. --- ..__. i
, TER-C5257-466 and model number from the nameplate data were compared to information given in the Component Evaluation Work Sheets (CES) of the Licensee's report. The site
. inspection is documented in a report dated anuary 7,1981. No deficiencies
, were noted.
On March 5,1980, Niagara Mchawk Power Carporation provided the NRC with a submittal on environmental qualification for the Nine Mile Point Unit 1 plant, -
, On November 1,1980, Niagara Moha<k Power Corporation previded the NRC vith a revised equipment environmental qualification submittal in response to IE Bulletin 79-013 for the Nine Mile Point Unit 1 plant [1].
_ On February 2, 1981, Niagara Mohawh Power Corporation submitted to the NRC further equipment environmental qualificatica information in response to IE Bulletin 79-OlB Supplement No. 3' and revised system component evaluation work sheets [12]. . On June 17, 1981, FRC ' issued to the NRC a Technical Evalu~ation Report on - -. - - equipment et ironmental qualification for Nine Mile Poinc~ Unit 1 [11]. " The NRC issued a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) to Niagara Mohawk Power Jorporation for Nine Mile Point Unit 1 on June 8, 1981 [13]. . Requests for information [34, 35, 36]~ vere transmitted to the NRC by FRC to obtain qualification documentation referenced by the Licensee in its - submittals, IMI Action Plan infermation, and correlations to NUREG-073 7 [10]. By letter dated September G,1981, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation transmi'tted to the NRC a responr.e to the SER [14]. On February 2, 1982, Niagara Mohawk Power Corparation provided the NRC with equipment environmental qualification information regarding TMI Action
.; Plan equipment 115].
i
. On March 2,1982, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation provided (1) a'dditional infor=ation regarding TMI Action Plan equipment, and (2) ~
h'!
.j qualification documentation requested by FRC for review (16]. ,
N 1-12 c.
,,5, 0 Franklin Research Center '
A Chesson af The FraNEn knutute w
I e J d 2 4
- : ti- -- . ,
. {
j h - TER-C525 7-466 I 1 ' 1
' i_ -
- On April 2,1982, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation submitted to the NRC '
j l .'.
-l i -.j ' revised- system / component evaluation work sheets and additional justification i a- {
J- r t for contin.ued operation (33). l' ?!
- (
- j. l}
.i , . . ,-) . "
;. q s 4 i
.j i.
. : 1
}
ii-1 i
- ' .'l, .
I.
.i s l- .
J' i
; a -
3 1
'r.-
. i
.g .
d 1 ' S
+
+ ,
. g. . .
i 4
..-]
1 4 d ,. 'l. , b
'5 .i i
4 I
,l 'L ,
j ;. - ;
. t **
s . * , JJ 4 . i ej .i. . 4. 1 . . s. . n ,-:, . 3 ,.
',~
.;i 1-13
.a uc0rromwiinaes..,csceniu 4
17, : a w w m r,- wn 4 9 '
. - . . .. ....a- . .-- --
so w - , - - , -,ww-,ww,-,,-,-,-+,-w--sar e -w ee-,-,,-%, ,- ,---ti--w.-y we m -e, ye - , g. i.e.wqv, e.vr,. , g--..- g-%,+y.sy,yrw . g -wm 1.% my-vy---w-g w--.m,m-7 y w -
.~
1
'I TER-C525 7-466 i.
.i .
j .
.s 2. 'NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL Q"ALIFICATION 7l 1 .
l! 2.1 CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE NRC The screening guidelines used to evaluate the 21ectrical equipment environmental qualification program were:
.j u DOR,Guidalines, " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification
.i, of Class lE Electrical Equipoent in Operating Reactors," November 1979
% +" a g ,
,f S
; o NUREG-0588, Revision 1, " Interim Staff Fosition on Environmental i Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment," July 1981 [9].
d; Other appropriate references used in the review of the licensees' f electrical equipment environmental qualification submittals are: o IE Bulletin 79-01B, " Environmental Qualification of Class lE Equipment," January, 14,-1980; Supplement No.1, February 29, 1980; . Supplement No. 2, September 29, 1980; and Supplement No. 3, October
, 24, 1980 [3,~4, 5, 6] ~ ~
) , o NUREG-0737, " Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements," November 1980 [10]. This document is applicable for the selection of equipment
;; for the evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments
- required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation.- The scope of the eview is limited to equipment associated with specific sections of
'1
. NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January
{. 1, 1981. Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed 1 equipment with implementation dates after January 1,1981 if
] adequately identified by the licensee.
u 2.2 STAFF POSITIONS AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA
~ ..j
] The NRC identified the following staff positions and supplemental
'] criteria to be used in conjunction with the referenced screening guidelines, b, _
1 2.2.1 Requirements and Applicable Criteria j Items 3 and 17 of Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-OlB [5] describe the application of the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 to operating reactors (ors), ,
't w
': 2-1 nklin 3.
% Research % Center
.- - . . = . . . .--
, -p _ _ _ _ ,
m aw eid-@'*We 4
. -- -- - - ~ ~ . ~'
TE R-C5257-466
~
+ near teus operating license applicants (NTOLs), and construction permit '
. applicants (cps). The qualifi' cation requirements and applicable criteria are stated as follows: ~
(Question 3]
- " Define the requirements and applicable criteria.for ors, NTOLs, and OLs. Specifically address the NTOLs whose CP SER is prior to July 1974 ,
- and after July 1974. ,Can a CP whose SER is prior to 1974 use the DOR
. guidelines?"
] [NRC Answer to Question 3] --
,' " Table 1 describes the application of each document. All operating reactors as of May 23, 1980, will be evat.uated against the DOR guidelines. In cases where the DOR guidelines do not provide sufficient detail, but NUREG-0588 Category II does, NUREG-0588 will be used.
,' TABLE 1 REQUIREMENTS . _ _
ors OLs g:1 cps CP SER CP SER , DOR GUIDELINES Before 7/1/74 After 7/1/74 USE NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 i AS NECESSARY (CAT. II) (CAT. I) (CAT. I) or NEW RULE WHEN i IN EFFECT
' .i - .. - REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS USE NUREG-0588 (CAT. I)
All plants licensed after May 23, 1980, shall conform to NUREG-0588. In -
. accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.89, all such operating lic.nses for facilities whose construction permit SER is dated July 1,1974 or later, t are to be reviewed against IEEE Std. 323-1974. Thus, for these licensees, i the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to the Category I column in NUREG-0588. For operating licenses issued af ter May 23, 1980, whose construction permit SER is dated before July 1,1974, the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to at least Category II column of NUREG-0588; unless the licensee made commitment in the construction
- permit record to use the 1974 standard, or un'l'ess the operating licensee ,
application record indicates that the 1974 standard is to be used, in
! such cases Column I of NUREG-0588 is to be used. .
While there are differences bet-een the Category II column of NUREG-0588 and the DOR guidelines, the differences are in details and in the .
'-2
- 0000 F anklin Research Center
. ,1 - A Dewisce of The Fe W I
. TER-C5 257-466 d
optional part of the documents. The minimum requirements set forth by Ji these documents are general and compatible. Thus, the minimum standards
", set by either of the two documenta are equally applicable to ors and fi NTOLs."
A lj [ Question 17] i " Define the requirements for ' replacement parts.' Are they the same for
'spere' parts? Clearly discuss the alternatives for existing inventories
- of parts / components. If equipment is ordered to meet IEEE Std. 323-1974 stanatrd but lead time axceeds June - 1982, can we use IEEE Std. 323-1971
. qualified components in the interim?" .
j __ [NRC Answer to Question 17]
, "The requirements for ' replacement' and ' spare' parts are the same for the purposes of complying with the Commission order and memorandum.
After May 1980, all parts used to replace presently installed parts shall be qualified to Category I of NUREG-0588 'unless there are sound reasons to the contrary.' Nonavailability and/or the fact that the part to be
- t. sed as a replacement is a spare part purchased prior to May 23, 1980, rad is in stock are among the factors to be considered in weighing whether there are ' sound reasons to the contrary.' All replacement parts shall as a minimum contorm to the requirements described in the answer to
" ' question 3. Justification for deviation from Category I of NUREG-0588 .
shall be documented by the licensee and records shall be available for - audit, upon request by the NRC."
. 2.2.2 Apolication of Requirements and Criteria to TMI Lessons
; Learned Implementation Equipment The NRC requested an evaluation-of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for
~
TMI Lessons Learned Implementation in accordance with criteria established by
.- . the NRC in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related N$ electrical equipment. Additionally, Item 21 of Supplement 2 to lE Bulletin 79-01B [5]. states:
"TMI Lessons Learned instrumentation will be considered in the February 1, 1981 SER. This equipment is subject to the same requirements as other
.j safety-related electrical" equipment. The guidance and requirements of nj NUREG-0588 referenced daughter standards, and Reg, Guides will be used by -
- the staff in assessing the adequacy of the qualification information."
Item 2 of Supplement 3 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [6] states: w "IEB 79-01B required a 90 day response which was due in mid-April 1980. - 3 Supplement 1 (Feb.1980) informed licensees that equipment which was
~
.' ' 2-3
.. _nidin Rese_ arch ._ Center 2l.. *'
n* ..
+ , - - - ,a
. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . ~ . ......:..-
l
.I
=
l . TE R-CS 257-466
.i
' planned' to be installed as a result of. lessons learned need not be -
fi addressed in that response. Some of this equipment has since been installed. Supplement #2 (Q.5, Q.21) identified that the staff position was that equipme-t which is installed should be treated in a manner
- 4:
j similar to all other safety-related electrical equipment and be addressed j in the November 1, 1980 submittal. This position represents no change in
'I staff position regarding the scope of the review. However, since the staff position on this issue was unclear the following will apply:
- a. Qualification information for installed TMI Action Plan equipment .
"~
must be submitted by February 1,1931. m [. b. Qualification informatica for future TMI Action Plan equipment (ref.
~
YI NUREG-0737, when issued), which requires NRC pre implementation
.j review, must be submitted with the pre-implementatio'n review data.
~Id
- c. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment currently, under NRC review should be submitted as soon as possible.
- d. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipuant not yet installed which does not require pre-implementation review should be submitted to NRC for-review by the implementation date."
2.2.3 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review -
~
Supplement 2 of IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all safety-related equipment items located in plant areas where the equipe2nt is not exposed to the direct effects of a high energy line break (EELB) or to nuclear radiation emanating from circulat, ion of fluids containing radioactive substances. Supplement 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B [6] permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all equipment required to achie ve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Supplements 2 and 3 of 79-01B originally permitted deferment until,
'. af ter February 1, 1981 of the qualification review of equipment locate.d in a mild environment or required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Since the issuance of Supplements 2 and 3, the NRC has
- determined that the review of environmental qualification for this equipment
; is not within the scope of the present review program.
2-4 b.f Franklin Research Center
+ m %r" w .
^ 4n
TER-CS 257-466 2.2.4 Clarification of Qualification Requirements 1 2.2.4.1 Service Conditicas Inside Containment for a Loss-of-Coolant Accident j (DOR Guidelines Section 4.1)
'A "l: For pressurized water reactors (PWRs), the DOR Cuidelines state that the .
l '. . containment temperature and pressure conditions as a function of time should
, be based on the most recent NRC-approved service conditions specified in the ,
j Final Safety Analysis Re' port (FSAR) or other licensee documentation. In the. y specific case of pressure-suppression type containments, the following minimum high temperature conditioca may be used: (1) boiling water ieactor (BWR)
~
;j l drywells -- 340*F for 6 hours and (2) PWR ice condenser lower compartments --
; 340*F for 3 hours. As stated in Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5],
i "these values are a screening device, per the Guidelines, and can be used in 4 lieu of a plant-specific profile, provided that expected pressure and humidity conditions as a function of time are accounced for." Service conditions should bound those expected for coolant and steam line breaks inside containment with due consideration given to analytical uncertainties. The steam line break condition should include superheated conditions, the peak temperature, and' subsequent temperature / pressure profiles
. as functions of time. If containment spray is to be used, the impact of the
, spray on required equipment should he assessed.
.', The adequacy of a plant-epecific profile depends on the assumptions and
~;f design considerations at the time the profiles were developed. The DOR 4~4 ,
Guidelines and NUREG-0588 provide guidance and considerations required to d determine if the calculated plant-spec,ific temperature / pressure profiles cG; encompass the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and HELB accidents inside
..; containment.
'i
'i 2.2.4.2 Submergence
,' (DOR Cuidelines Section 4.1, Subitem 3; and Section 4.3.2, Subitem 3) d3 ~
.M Equipment submergence (inside or outside containment) should be addressed II ,
where the possibility exists that submergence of equipm'ent may resu.lt from , HELBs or other postulated occurrmaces. Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5]
; ; provides the following additional criterion: If the equipment satisfies che -
' .t 2-5
- 9.\.
u_ . M, Franklin Research Center
* '4 A Chan.cn es N reinadn ineen,se O
.. . _. . . . , . . . .. ......a-1 s
TE R-c5257-466 guidance and other requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 for the LOCA and RELB accidents, and the licensee demonstrates that its failure will not adversely affect any safety-related function or mislead the operator after submergence, the equipment can be considered exempt from the succergence portion of the qualification requirements. i i - 2.2.4.3 Simulated Service Conditions and Test Duration
- f (DOR Guidelines Section 5.2.1) k The Guidelines require that the test chamber environment envelop the y required service conditions for a time equal to the period from the initiation of the accident until the service conditions return to normal. Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] provides the following additional criterion:
4
" Equipment designed to' perform its safety-related function within a short
- time into an event =ust be qualified for a period of at least I hour in excess of the time assumed in the accident analysis. The staff has
~
indicated that time is the most significant factor in terms of the margins required to provide an acceptable cdnfidence level that a . . safety-related function,will be completed. The 1-hour qualification - requirement is based on the acceptance of a type test for a single unit and the spectrum of accidents (email and large breaks) bounded by the . - single test." 2.2.4.4 Test Sequence (DOR Guidelines Section 5.2.3) Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] provides the following additional - criteria:
.).
" Sequential testing requirements are specified in NUREG-0,588 and the DOR Guidelines. Licensees must follow the test requirements of the
- lj applicable document.
.~ .
' Ej- 1. If the test has been completed without aging in sequence, justification for such a deviation must be submitted.
- 2. If testing of a given component has been scheduled but not initiated, the test sequence / program should be modified to include aging.
l'l O
~
- 3. Test programs in progress should be evaluated regarding the ability to comply by incorporating aging in the proper sequence. These programs
- would then fall in the first or second category." -
b
..N"
".4' ,
2, 2 - nklin Research Center
,, A Dras.cn of The Frannan inschAs
- Y i.
- w~
1 TER-C5257-466 2.2.4.5 Radiation (DOR Guidelines Sections 4.1.2, 4.2.2, and 4.3.2, Subitem 2) Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-OlB [5] provides the following additional
.i criteria:
"Both the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 are similar in that they provide the' methods for determining the radiation source term when considering LOCA events inside containment (100% noble gases /50% iodine /1% .
particulhtes). The'se methods consider the radiation source term 3,,~ resulting frontan- event which completely depressurises the primary system s and releases the source term inventory to the containme,nt.
" NUREG-0578 provides the radiation source term to be used for determining the qualification doses for equipment in close prcAimity to recirculating fluid systems inside and outside of containment as a result of LOCA. -
This method considers a LOCA event in which the primary system may not depressurize and the source term inventory remains in the coolant. , NUREG-0588 also provides the radiat on source term to be used for qualifying equipment following non-LOCA events ob'th inside and outside containment (10% noble gases /10% icdine/0% particulates).
' f When deve' loping radiation source termJ for equipment qualification, the licensee must ensure consideration is given to those events which provide the most bounding conditions. The following table summarizes these -
considerations:
~
LOCA Non-LOCA HELB. Outside Containment NUREG-0578 NUREG-0588 (100/50/1 (10/10/0 in RCS) [*] in RCS) Inside Containment Larger of s
.3 NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 (100/50/1 (10/10/0 in~ containment) in RCS) or i
. NUREG-0578 (100/50/1 M in RCS) -
,i
*The numbers in parentheses repres'ent % noble gases /% iodine /% particulates.
RCS means reactor coolant system. . t . g 2-7
$$ Franidin Research Center
* - a w am. re wu.
._ . . .. . _ . = ..
~ .a . . - . . . . . . . .a . - - . . - . . .. . .s t ...a-~.. w .
TER-C5257-466
> Gac=a equivalents may be used when consideration of the concibutions of beta exposure has been included in accordance with the guidance given in the DDR Guidelines and NUREG-0588. Cobalt 60 is one acceptable gamma radiation source for environmental qualification of safety-related
. equipment. Cesium 137 may also be used."
.t l'
'j 2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qualification Requirements The NRC has worked .with a number of licensees, at their requests, to provide further clarification on environmental qualification requirements. On
' j* January 20, 1982, the NRC issued Generic Letter No.3 82639, [8] presenting staff
'] !
positions on certain aspects of the qualification requirements. Generic Letter No. 82-09 states: t
- "1. Operator Display Instrumentation
.+ Q. Given the interrelated activities associated with display instrumentation (e.g., NUREG-0700, NUREG-0799, proposed Regulatory Guide 1.97 and Equipment Qualification , efforts), what display . : ; < , :.
instrumentation referenced .in emergency operating procedures must be _ identified in licen'see submi;tal'to the NRC? . A. All display instrumentation referenced in gh.e emergency procedures need not be identified. The NRC requires that. licensees need only identify and have available qualification documentation on_those operator display instruments which are safety-related (see Question
~, 2). If licensees have previously supplied a listing of all display instrumentation referenced in emergency procedures, licensees may
. identify (such as by the use of an *) which of those instruments are i safety-related. The staff will defer review of the basis for this safety-related classification until other NRC activitiesl have been implemented. When these other activities are implemented,
.1 additional instruments presently not requiring qualification may
.j require upgrading to a safety-related status and/or may require
~G qualification. Licensees will be required at that time to qualify
- 1. this instrumentation in accordance yith the following criteria:
y o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operation date prior to the equipment qualification deadline, qualification
; must be accomplished by the equipcant qualification deadline.
- =;
~
ISuch activities include preparation of new emergency procedures (NUREG-0799), control room design reviews (NUREG-0700), and upgrading of
~~'
accident mocitoring instrumentation (Reg. Guide 1.97 and NUREG-0737). . 2-8 W A ' branklin Research Center
'a g a om # w rr.nao u.
f 1 t i TER-CS 257-466
~.
o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operation date
; after the. equipment qualification dea'dline, qualification must be j accomplished prior to equipment operation and plant acceptance.
- 2. Safety-Related Equipment l
Q. For Equipment Qualification purposes, what constitutes all
. safety-related electrical; equipment?
.5 - A. The Commission, in CLI-80-21, required the environmental
; qualification- of only safety-related electrical equipment.,
Identification of the safety-related equipment installed at specific
~ -i plants can be obtained from FSARs, Technical'SpkcLEications and l
other docketed correspondence' setting forth NRC^ requirements or 5 licensee commitments. Identification. of saEhty related L equipment installed in harsh environments at specific plants must be supplied by the licensee. The necessity for upgrading nonsafety-related system to safety-related status will be the subject of other NRC reviews.
- 3. Replacement Parts
.Q . Please clarify. the NRC requirements on replacement parts.
A. In CLI-80-21, the Commission stated that unless there were sound reasons to the contrary,' replacement equipment _should be qualified to the standards set forth in Category I of NUREG-0588.* Tue Commission's position was designed to promote the policy of . upgrading the environmental qualification and reliability of
; installed safety-related electrical equipment. To meet this overall i goal,~ licensees must institute internal policy practices consistent
,I with the Commission's statement.
$ Situations may arise in which upgrading to NUREG-0588, Category I of
'; replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category II or the l
DOR Guidelines will not be compatible wit!. overall' station safety ' * + and performance goals. Licensees must review such. situations on a
- case-by-case basis and determine that ' sound reasons to the contrary' do, in f act, exist.which warrant the use of replacement equipment (not necessarily in-kind) qualified to the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, Category II. For equipment located in a harsh environment, licensees' procedures must provide for documentation and substantiation of such determinations.
d O i e 4 A Cn won of The Frannan knetuse
** * *~
' * + --
. , . ~ .*' , . - - -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . ~ . - . . . ... -.. . . - . .
'l
.' ;t
. TER-C5257-466 1
~
Conditions which reflect sound . reasons why qualification standards
, for replacement of equipment in a harsh environment need not be upgraded to NUREG-0588, Category I include the following:
1
- 1. The licensee has replacement equipment in stock that meets the 1 DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, Category II, and procurement e
,* 'i actions regarding such replacement equipment had commenced prior to May 23, 1980.
3 2. Replacement equipment qualified to the NUREG-0588, Category I
- standards doe's not exist.
d 3. Repl.icement equipment qualified to the NUREG.-0588, category I . ,' standards is not available to meet installation and operation schedules. Equipcant qualified to the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588,' Category II may be used for an interim period until ' Category I equipment is obtained and an outage of sufficient duration is available for replacement. Justification for use of the non-Category I qualified replacement equipment beyond this interim period must be submitted to the NRC for approval prior to the end of the interim period and in suf ficient time for reasonable NRC review. .. ; .
- 4. Replacemenc equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category I . ', ---
standards would require' significant plant modifications to : accommodate its use.
- 5. Operating performance and reliability data for the Category I eouipment indicates poor overall equipment performance. For example, mean time to failure is significantly shorter for the Cate;ory I replacement equipment.
~
- 6. The use of replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588,
,; Category I standards has a significant probability of crearing 3- human factor problems that will negatively af fect plant safety and performance, e.g., (1) knowledge, ' skills and ability of existing plant staff require significant upgrading to operate or maintain the specific Category I replacement equipment; (2) the use of equipment qualified to Category I standards creates a i one-of-a-kind application; or (3) maintenance, surveillance or calibration activities are unnecessarily complex.
- 5. Submergence outside Containment i ~
~
$ Q. For equipment qualification purposes, what are the staff requirements concerning submergence of equipment outsida containment?
-a N
2-10
'~! ~ ., ; dd Franklin Research Center , g. 3 *o~ =aer w r e .na. .m .
t .
, TER-C5257-466 A. TF2 Staff requires that the licensee submit documentation on the qualification of safety-related equipment that could be submerged due to a high energy line break outside containment.
l i
; 6. Radiation 4
. Q. Is the staff screening value of 4 x 107 rads applicable to all
; operating reactors?
A. No. This screening value is applicable only to PWRs with dry type. containments. However, for PWRs with dry type. containments, the
', j licensee may choose to use slant specific analysis instead of the
; screening value. For plant. with other containment types, the licensee must use plant specific analysis.
Acceptable to the Staff for equipment qualification purposes are
, radiation values developed as part of the plant licensing process provided that they are based on the TID 14844 source terms and arn conservatively performed. In order to assure that the methodologies are appropriate, the Staff requests two component specific sample , calculations (one for inside and one for outside containment), .-nd a.
brief written description of each of the methodologies used, their application and associated ccuservatisms. Such sample calculations- -
~'
and a statement by the licensee that the values of radiation exposure of components so derived are appropriate for environmental
. qualification of equipment will satisfy the Staff's concern on the
' Radiation Specification Value' used during the qualification reviews.
; 7. Containment Service conditions
'I .
Q. Must the Staff value (identified in the SERs) of TSAT for PWRs and t TSAT + 20*F for BWRs be used as the maximum in-containment
,j temperature for the purpose of equipment qualificatio.s?
i A. No. The Staff will accept the use of these values. However, an acceptable alternative to the NRC staf f's temperatu. e criterion used for the service conditions must base that service condition on the
, FSAR analysis or other NRC approved analysist proviled that the specific analysis, or a summary of that analy' sis, together with reference to the previous NRC cceeptance of the analysis is submitted by the licensee. In addition, some of the information in the associated safety evaluation may require clarification.
~
2 [ 8. One Hour Minimum Operating Time Q. The Staff has previously indicated that certain exceptions to the one hour minimum operating time rule are permitted. Can further , clarification be provided? , 2-11 O ' UNU Franklin Research Center A Dhatson d The Fraruda insca.se , L
.m.
- v
_..w . . . . . . _ . . . . . _ _ .. . . - . . .. . . .. _ . .. . . . . . . , ... t
- t-I i I
.1.
. TER-C525 7-466 3
l.Jj A. With regard to plants subject to the qualification requirements of
! the DOR Guidelines or Category II of NUREG-0588, for those pieces of i equipment tested prior to May 23,1980, 'the test data and analysis
.j may be used to qualify the equipment to the required operating time T'i - plus an apprcpriate margin. The one hour margin requirement need not d.] . be applied. However, subsequent failures'should be shown not to be a detrimental to plant safety.
1
. bj The'one hour time margin rule is not applicable to equipment whose 3 . safety function. is performed prior to significant changes in the * ~.+ 1l [ environment at th'e equipment location.
4c-
, 4 '. R 9. Aging g)
Q. Must a qualified life be_.dereloped for all safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments? 1 A. Section 7 of the DCR Guidelines and Sectica 4.2, Category II of
..j}
r NUREG-0588, do not require a qualified life to be established for.all safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh savironments. A c qualified life, in accordance with the provisions in IEEE 323-1914, r' is required for eqdipmentf including replaceme'nt parts, qualified' to a ., Category I of NUREG-0588 that is located s a har'sh environment. '
, '0'- .u = -
An acceprable nethod for addressing'ir.-service degrad'ation is through - a presentive maiatenance/ surveillance program with equipment and a component refurbishment and/or repla:ement based on known susceptibility to aging degradation, the results of inspections, or 1- manufacturers recommendations.- These elemen'es of the program lead to
; an understandiag.on a device speci~fic basis of the nature and extent of the increased stress levels encountered during Design Basis .
. Accidents and resultant degradation (if any) which may occur.
^
.) Arrhenius or other appropriate accelerated aging. methodologies may be
.k used to establish replacement and refurbishment schedules if the component's design and materials application are sufficien,tly simple
- .l and the necessary data are ,available to alive a meanin'gful applica- ,
1 tion. 7
.1 T4 In plants subject to the qualification requirements of either the DOR
' .l - Guidelines or NUREG-0588 Category II, for equipment that has been
.J.i identified as being susceptible to significant degradation due to
. y (] thermal and radiation aging, the. schedule for inspection of and/or replacement of the susceptible components in that equipment must be
', l j incorporated into the preventive maintenance and surveillance
> -4? programs, and that information should be incorporated into the system - -
_ - 22 component evaluation worksheets (SCEWS). For other equipment, the-
, } aging column in the SCEWS should be marked SNo Known Susceptibility'."-
- +
-u - '
i
. 1
'< .2-12 4
!iUUU Franknn Research Center m m.m. a. rm.ma,
TER-CS 25 7-466 - y 3. METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION e
3.1 INTRODUCTION
As discussed in Section 1.,3 of this report, the NRC issued Safety . Evaluation Reports.(SERs') on envirenmental. qualification of safety-related equipment to licensees of all operating plants in mid-1981.
.; The SERs identified various equipment qualification def iencies as indicated below:
LEGEND: DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY R - Radiation M - Margin'
'T - Temperature I - HELB Evaluation Outside-QT - Qualification Time Containment Not Campleted RI - Required Time QM - Qualification Method P - Pressure - -
RPN - Equipuent Relocation or Replacement, H - Humidity ' -
. Adequate behedule Not Provided.
CS - Chemical Spray ^
- EXN - Exempted Equipment Justification --
~
sc 1-A - Material Aging Evaluation, Inadequate -' ' " Replacement Schedule, Ongoing SEN - Separate Ef fects Qualification . Equipment Surveillance Justification Inadequate S - Submergence. ,QI - Qualification Information Being (R) - Licensee has cocmitted Developed to replace equipment RPS - Equipment Relocation or Replacement Schedule Provided
- i I
The SERs directed licensees to "aither provide documentation of the missing
. qualification information which demonstrates that safety-related equipment ,i' meets the DOR Cuidelines or NUREG-0588 requirements or commit to a corrective -
action (re-qualification, replacement [etc.]) to establish qualification by June 30, 1982." Licensees were required to respond to the NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.
. As stated in Section 1.1, the purpose of this report is (1) to evaluate
^
'. . licensees' resolutions of outstanding issues related to safety-related -
} electrical equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) discussed in the NRC's
~
SERs in accordance with NRC criteria, and (2) to evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment, including , [
~.l.
nVm Research Center a cwr nw v. r nan m -
,. . . - .. .: ' *: r 7 * ' ~~
. . - - - . . - . . . . . .s. .-
I TER-C525 7-466 t L- TMI Lessons Learned Implementation equipment, located in harsh environments in *
'c t accordance with criteria established by the NRC (see Section 2 of this report). The methodology used to evaluate (1) the Licensee's response to theI
~l NRC SER and (2) the equipment environmental qualification is presented herein.
.1 4
3.2 METHODOLOGY i The ' Licensee, Niaga'ra. Mohawk Power Corporation, provided a response to
., the SER and additional qualification information in its submittals [14, 15,
;4 16, 33] to the NRC for the Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Nuclear-Power Plant.
. 4g The following bases provided by the NRC were used to determine the' relative completeness of the Licensee's submittals:
o Determine whether the Licensee provided specific responses to the SER Concerns.
. o Determine whether the Licensee proposed corrective actions and a __
m , schedule for completion of the actions. . . ;_ s. . o Determine whether the Licensee addressed'the NRC's concern for margin. - with respect to the containment environmental conditions. - o Determine whether the Licensee revised the environmental parameters. o Determine whether the Licensee's System Component Evaluation ~ Work Sheets (SCEWS) were updated to correct deficiencies and add supplemental information. ,
. 'G li o Determine whether the Licensee provided justifications for interim
-i operation for all unqualified equipment.
- o Determine whether the Licensee addressed aging and incorporated the
- results into the equipment maintenance program.
']*
i- , ,cesj The extensive list of safety-related electrical equipment
- in various
~t :3
,1 locations of the plant identified by the Licensee was analyzed, and all
, identical equipment located within plant areas that are exposed to the same
;4 environmental service conditions was grouped together and designated an 1! -
- n -
. . ; ,' *In this report, the term " safety-related electrical equipment" refe,cs to the .
.' equipment defined by the two NRC Cuid slines referenced in Section 2.1.
i 1 3-2
; x
.'N
,- ij b Franklin Research Center no~.twre w
'f.
~
i: TE R-C525 7-466 6 .
" equipment item." In this report, the term " equipment item" refers to a specific type of electrical equipment, designated by manufacturer and model, which-is representative of all identical equipment in a plant area exposed to
.I; the same' tuvironmescal service conditions (e.g., Flow Transmitter, Fischer &
Porter, Model 10B2496, located within containment). This analysis resulted in , }. a reduced listing of equipment (equipment items) that formed the basis for the review. ~ Appendix A contains the environmental service conditions for each
~
location.- Appendix B contains the tabulation of the equipment items, n ' locations, function, plant identification numbers, required operating. time,' and applicable qualification documentation references. Appendix C lists the plant systems identified by the Licensee and the NRC as being essential to safety. Each item in the list of safety-related electrical equipment items was reviewed in relation to:
'o the Licensee's response 'to the 'SER concerns o technical information received from the Licensee as e result of requests for additional information (Appendix E)
, o technical data derived from the Licensee's submittal .
,' o NRC' DOR Cuidelines or NUREG-0588 Revision 1. criteria o the Licensee's definition of harsh service environments (Appendix A)
-: e documentation cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualification
^!
[J* o applicable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment environmental qualification program
,', o- the Licensee's analysis and/or justification of qualification o Licensee proposed corrective action fo'r. qualification deficiencies o .the Licensee's equipment /part replacement schedules ,
o the Licensee's technical arguments concerning the adequacy of-
- equipment, based on system operational considerations o the Licensee's rationale concerning exemption of equipment from .
qualification.
. 3-3
,8f Franidin Research Center
^
- N " 5"6'***
*.m a a m 3.e ga e h
_.: j.
-q 1 . TER-CS257-466 4
J
'h Topics not within the scope of the evaluation are:
I o completeness of the Licensee's. listing of safety-related equipment 4 o acceptability of Licensee provided environmental service conditions. , 1 1 The NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of ' d d;- safety-relar.ad electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for
;j TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification *
,' documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01B, supplement
- s
- 3 (item 2):, ib accordance with criteria established by t;hs NRC (see Section 2 of this re,por,[t) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-j relatedelectricalequipment. The scope of this review is limited to TMI
; Action Plan equipment associated with those sections of NUREG-0737 which have l an equipment installation implementation date of January 1,1982 (sections are
; identified below). Where applicable, a review was to be pe rformed on l installed equipment with implementation dates af ter January 1,1981 if
) adequately identified by the licensee.. . e ' m ,-. , II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant I and Containment II.D.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position 9, II.E.1.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication II.E.3.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Heaters (Safety-Grade Interfaces)
; II.E.4.1 (ALL/7-1/81) Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations -
"l II.E.4.2 (ALL/1-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependability
'1 II.F.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core d '
Cooling
.J J II.G.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizer Equipment (Safety-Grade Interfaces)
L'i .
. .j II.K.2.10 (PWR/B&W/7-1-81) Safety-Grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip II.K.3.9 (PWR/W/1-1-81) PID Controller Modification (If Hardware Change j Involved)
_nklin Rese_ arch Center 1 - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
TER-C5257-466
^
II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/1-1-81) Articipatory Reactor Trip upon Turbine Trip - II.K.3.13 (PWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolation of HPCI and RCIC Systems II.K.3.19- (BWR/CE/7-1-81) Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loop II.K.3.21 (BWR/GE/7.-1-18) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Systems- (If
- Hardware Changed Out)
, _II.K.3.27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level.for Vessel Level Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed C st)
Licensees whose plants were included within the NRC Systematic Evaluation-Program received a Technical Evaluation Report (TER) in addition to the SER.
$ .The TER was . based on a review of equipment environmental qualification documentation associated with the Licensee's EEQ submittals. The qaalification-
. . deficiencies identified in the EER were derived from the TER.~ Plants included within this program were. the Palisades, . Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, . _ _
' Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse,' and Big Rock Point ' plants and Zion Station Units 1 and -
2, Indian Point Units 2 and 3,-Millstone Unit 1, Dresden Unit 2, and San - Onofre Unit 1. For these plants, the evaluation presented herein is based on (1) the result of the initial TER, (2) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER-and the TER, and (3) the Licensee's updated EEQ submittal (s). . l ' TERs were also developed for the following plants: Nine Mile Point Unit
. 1, Millstone Unit 2, Salem Unit 1, Browns Ferry Units 1, . 2, and 3, Brunswick
.j Units 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Dresden Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1 l ,
i and 2. The' objective of those TERs was to review the Licensee's submittals to determine if safety-related electrical equipment was reviewed for environmental qualification by the Licensee in accordance with the DOR Guidelines and
, NUREG-0588 as required by IE Bulletin 79-01B. For these 13 plants ond all other plants, excluding the 14 plants associated with the Systematic Evaluation l Program, the evaluation presented herein is based solely on (1) the Licensee's _
response to the NRC SER and (2) the Licensee's revised EEQ submittal (s). This technical evaluation was conducted to identify (1) whether the l Licensee provided an adequate response to the SER concerns (and TER concerns,. ,
, nidin Research Center
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ O
. j4 o.
,j --
..s
_. TER-C5257-466
,'],
' ll where applicable), (2) =ajor. deficiencies within the equipment qualification d ,
.l program, and (3) whether the L'icensee proposed adequate corrective actions to e, resolve qualification deficiencies-and provided a schedule for completion of l the corrective actions. The TER was written primarily to address deviations u
4 Lj from the NRC criteria and requirements. Technical data or test results that
.'j;; .
w satisfy the qualification criteria are not discussed herein,
:a . .
1 The evaluation presented in Section 4 of this report includes ccepleted
.I ) equipment environmental qualification review checksheets (partially (4 handwritten) which compile both the technical informatiot cecessary to conduct
, the review and the results of the evaluation. Parameters listed on these 2
checksheets were derived from the appropriate NRC screening criteria. The .
.l evaluation of each equipment item includec several checksheet pages. Only
'; those checks'heet pages necessary to complete the evaluation for each equipment
.l item are included in this report. A complete listing of the checksheet pages is shown on the bottom of Checksheet la, reproduced here as Figure 3-1. ~ -
. The checksheets contain the following information: ,
o Equipment item information (see Figure 3-1), for example: , 3
- Solenoid Valve Located in Turbine Building (Area #7)
-{ Automatic Switch Co. (ASCO) Model L38300B61U "1 Actuates Feedwater Control Valves (V-4269, V-4270)
'J
. Licensee Reference 839 Required Operating Time: Short term (SI signal)
- j. TER Checksheet No. 1 j Reference 59, Section 4.5.2.6 Page 9 [62]; Table 3, Page 1 {1]; SCEW l
'4 . Licensee Submittal:
o Qualification deficiencies identified in the SER (see Figure 3-1)- [] o Licensee's response to the SER
...5 1 o Licensee's statements and rationale for qualification A
o Licensee's corrective action and replacement schedule H
'! o Evaluation of qualification including identification of all j deficiencies -
'i2 o Evaluation of system considerations presented by-ene Licensee as a
'd rationale for excluding equipment frc's qualification.
. -a ~
*g . I
~ d The results of the evaluation are summarized on Checksheet 2 (Equipment i
), Environmental Qualification Summary Form) for each equipment item. Checksheet -
9 u..,.M, ,, 3-6 l Udd Franklin Research Center y A Dus.on d The Frenda insunde Y' ,
TER-CS257-466 NRC Contract No. fd RC43-79418 Page A[FranMin L0b Researth Center FRC Project No.CS257 A tu d N Fwanlaimme FRC Aasignment No.13 la -
.'em .as a.se se a PW.. Pa. 4tlG3 (2154 4441000 FRC Task No.
ECul? MENT ENVIRCNMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW CF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. _, Equipment Ites No. 1 Solenoid valves I,ocated in Turbine Building (Area #7) Automatic Switch Co. (AS,1) Model LIS300361U Actuates Teedwater Control Valves (V-4169, V-4270)
- Licensee Reference 1617 Required Operating Ti:ner Short- ters (SI sigsal)
TER Ciecksbest No.1 Reference 39, Section 4.5.2.6 Liwnsee Submittal: Page 9 [62]; Table 3. Page 1 (1); FRC SCEW 1-- A _ CESICIATICH FOR DEFICIINCf IDDITIFIED BT THE NRC S3 - CIBC'E IM(S) CNLT! ~.. ~~ (See Section 3 of Ihis TER for Wend) R, T. W , Rf, F, B, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, % AFil, EXN, SEN, QI, RFS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING CF APPLICABLE CHFCKSHM,s Centents Checksheet Pace %. Equipment Item la Snwary of Licensee Responsee to the NDC SEE lb Equipsent Environ:nental Qualification Su:saary Forms 2 Licensee Rarponse to NaC SIR 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration Review 44, 4b, 4c, 44, de, 4f Equipment Enviroroental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Se, 54, Se, 5f, Sg, 5h, Si, Sj Installed Dt1 14 ems Learned Implementation 6e, 6b Equipment Susanary Maintenance and Baplacement Schedule Su= nary
- 7a, 7b, 7e ,
Figure 3-1. Sample Checksheet Page la
" Equipment Itesa" nklin Research Center
. ~ ~ ~
. . .i. :- J. 1 m =
. . . . . . . . ~ . .
n
- t TE R-C5257-4'66
, ' ' f. ,
y I 2 specifically identifies any qualification deficiencies dete.rmined by the
-o evaluation and identifies the NRC qualification category to which the equipment
, D, item was assigned. A sample Checksheet 2 is a :: ted in Figure 3-2.
.:3 JI All information was reviewed for conformance to the NRC criteria referenced in Section 2 of this report. As requested by the NRC, all appli-
.'[, cable and available qualification documentation asaociated with the overall Equipment Environmental ' Qualification (EEQ) program was used by the reviewers, g whether referenced by the Licensee or not.
f:y Upon completion of the review for each equipment item, an overall
.)
a evaluation of the component and a specific conclusion with respect to its qualification was developed. Based on the evaluation, each~ equipment item was assigned to one of the generic qualification categories pre rided by the NRC. The NRC category descriptions are presented in Section 3.3 of this report. 3.3 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS - . .. o NRC Category I.a . EQUIPMENT THAT SATISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS .0F THE DOR ~ GUIDELINES OR NUREG 0538, OR HAS ACCEPTABLE DEVIATIONS FROM THE DOR /NUREG
. CRITERIA This category includes equipment items which are fully acceptable on the basis that all applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 are (1) satisfied and the equipment has been found to be
', qualified or (2) sufficient information has been presented to determine
- gj that deviations from the criteria are acceptable or insignificant.
c j o NRC Category I.b
, EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH DEVIATIONS FROM THE DOR GUIDILINES OR NUREG-0588 ARE .
JUDGED CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THAT SP ECIFIC MODIFICATIONS ARE
. MADE 1
This category includes equipment items that c'o not satisfy one or more
- of the applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidalines or NUREG-0588;
, however, r.he Licennee has stated that specific modifications vill be made
. on or before a designated date. This equipment is considered by NRC to be conditionally acceptable provided that the spec'i'f0 modifications are made ~
} by the Licensee. When the modifications are comrieted as proposed, the 3 Licensee, states that the equipment will satisfy all applicable NRC -
requirements. Examples of specific modifications are (1) replacement of unqualified equipment with qualified equipment, (2) equipment hardware
.y 3-8 A ~
UidEFanWin Research Center
~. 4 -
,j-A Dw d The Franda Irmatde .
TER--c525 7-466 = NRC Contract No. NRC4-79118 - P,ge Qd. n.rik!h Rewarch Center FRC Prolect No.C137 - A Dha==a ed TM Fund. lammas PtC Asalynment No.13 2 ze w R- s= rw.p mes ms,44mm FRC Tast No. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAt; CUAUFICATTON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _
-i ECUIPMENT l'.;ffRON!<!NTAL QUALIFICATION SL%ARY FCRM J
DESIGN)?ICN I
- CEFICITNCy NRC RECUIREMEN M .
; Documented Evidence of CJalification Mequate Mequate Similarity Setween-Equipent and . Test Specimen Estiblished
,4ing Deseadatica Evaluated- Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) ~~
i Progras Established to Identify Ming Legradation Criteria Regarding Agia; Simulatica Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Tamperature/ Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate s o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate . o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately 1 o Steam Exposure (If Required) Mequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied , criteria Regarding Sateergence Satisfied Critaria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied C:itaria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied f _
,,e
- Critaria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Critaria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) .- DESIGNATICN Z = CA"'? GORY NRC QUALI7ICATICN CATEGORY I.s. Equipent Qualified . I.b Equipent Qualification Pending ledification
,} II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.h Equipment Not Qualified '
q II.c Equipment satisfies All Paquirements Except qualified Life er Replacement Schedule Justified
'jf III.a III.D Equipment Exempt Fros Qualification Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
'y IV Documentation M)t Made Available I -
1
~
Figure 3-2. Sample Checksheet Page 2 ,
' " Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Form" N Franklin Research Center A Dvessand IM Fremain W e
46 @ m g .W4 r ,
. - . . ...s --
. 1
'I TE R-C5257-466 i
modification, (3) equipment relocation above submergence level, (4) ~ relocation or shielding of , equipment from radiation source, (5) verifica-q tion of qualification by additional testing, (6) equipment relocation to a J.qJ mild environment, and (7) qualification testing of equipment in progress. 4 o NRC Category II.a ej EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THAT THE EQUIFhENT IS OR IS NOT QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE J 5 DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588
.' ( .
The qualification of equipment items in this category, in accordance
,' with the requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, is significantly
,y deficient or inconclusive based upon review of (1) the documentation
? provided by the Licensee or (2) applicable and availadte qualification
documentation associated with the overall equipment environ = ental qualification program. The qualification documentation indicates signifi-i cant deficiencies, which can be categorized as follows: (1) appropriate documentation reflecting qualification has not been cited and made available
^ for review by the Licensee and there is no knowledge of applicable docu-mentation; (2) the Licensee is awaiting qualification from the equipment vendor; or (3) the qualification documentation indicates significant deficiencies; however, where testing was conducted, no reported failures or -
~
severe anomalies were observed which would unquestionably af fect the . _ , - _ .s - ability of the equipment to perform its design basis safety function (s). _ z e ; c -
- 1 o NRC Category II.b EQUIPMENT THAT IS UNQUALIFIED This category includes equipment items whose qualification documenta-tion has been judged tu be seriously deficient based upon review of (1) the documentation provided by the Licensee, or (2) applicable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment environmental qualification program. The qualification documentation indicates serious deficiencies reported during testing; for example, severe
; anomalies or failure of the test specimen, which could affect the ability of the equipment to perform its safety function. NRC has- requested 1
immediate written notification when an ei.uipment item is placed in this j category during the course of the review. 1 ce j o NRC Category II.c
] EQUIPMENT THAT SA'TISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOR GUIDELINES
'
- OR NUREG-0588 WITH TF E EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE b
i This category includes equipment items that are acceptable on the basis i that all applicable criteria defined in the JOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 4 are satisfied with the exception of the qualified life criterion. The _ i Licensee (1) has not evaluated qualified life or replacement schedule, (2) has not adequately evaluated qualified life or replacement schedule, or (3) ~ has not adequately intepreted qualified life in terns of calendar time. [ Note: The comporent replacement schedule discussed in Section 7.0 of the 23 3-10 nkHn Research Center
.j A D>sson d The Franman ensonae 5:~l
- t 4
TER-C525 7-466 -
+
I DOR Cuidelines is, in effect, a qualified life. It is not essential to use the term " qualified life," ,but the replacement schedule must be justified.]. 4 o NRC Category III.a 4 EQUIPMENT THAT IS EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION This category includes equipment items that are exempt from qualification on the basis that (1) the equipment does not provide a safety function (i.e. , 'should not have been included in the equipment list
- submitted by the Licensee), oc (2).the-specific safety-related function of the equipment can be accomplished by seme.other designated equipment that j is fully qualified and satisfies thersingle failure criterion. In addition, any failure of the exempt equipment must not mislead the operator or degrade the ability of qualified equipment to' perform its required safety-related function.
o NRC Category III.b EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE QUALIFICATION REVIEW This category includes equipment items addressed by the Licensee in the equipment environmental qualification submittals which are (1) required to - achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition or (2) located in a mild environment. Supplement 2 of IE Bulletin 79-01B permits
' deferment of the review of envirommental qualification for all safety-
' related equipment' items located in plant areas where the equipment is not exposed to the direct effects of a high energy line break .(HELB) or to nuclear radiation emanating from c 'irculation of fluids containing radioactive substances. Supplement 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all equipment required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition.
- Supplements 2 and 3 of IE Bulletin.79-OlB originally permitted deferment
-
- until af ter Februa ry 1, 198 A 'of tre qualification review of equipment located in a mild environment or required to achieve and maintain the plant j in a cold shutds n condition. Since the issuance of Supplements 2 and 3, J]
the NRC has determined that the review of environmental qualification for. t this equipment is not within the scope of this report. , 4 j o NRC Category IV EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION HAS NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE
.! FOR REVIEW
.3 i This category includes equipment items for which qualification -
documentation in.accordance with the requirements of the DOR Cuidelines
~~< }
or NUREG-0588 has been cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualifica-l tica; however, this documentation has not been made available for review. - j Therefore, a conclusion cannot be reached with respect to qualification of
', this equipment.
t 3-11 4UNIJ FranW;n Rescamh Cents '
.t a or n or Ts. n.nen in iui.
) -
-. . . . _ . . . .. . . . - . - :... ....-..-u--~
'A
- 1
~ .I
- TER-C5257-466
.. g 3.4 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR FULFILLING NRC CRITERIA The NRC has requested tha't a detailed implementation guide for fulfilling NRC criteria be prepared as part of this assignment. The implementation guide will present a fully detailed discussion of the principal , qualification criteria presented in the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588. The primary emphasis j will be .to clarify technical points, eliminate possible misconceptions, and clearly provide definitive guidance to enable licensees to understand and
~
resolve, in an expeditious manner, qualification deficiencies identified as a
-] result of this TER. The implementation guide (TER-C5257-332) has been j prepared and issued to the NRC. The implementation guide is either appended l to this TER or will be forwarded to the Licensee by the NRC under a separate j letter. The Licensee is encouraged to review that 'ocument.d 1 .
I s I
- .j 41 s .-
13i L5 s . a sj * *
~
3-12 3 - ildOU FrankEn Research Center 4 % w m r.e u.
.. 1
~, .-. .
l.
- ee a
i - 4. .
. TER-C5257-466
', 4. TECHNIC.U. EVALUATION 4.1 D4TRODUCTION The technical evaluation presented in this section represents the eouipment environmental q'ualificationa(EEQ) assessment.for each equipment item-listed in Appendix B in accordan,ce with the methodology presented in Section 3.
i of this report. The evaluations were conducted to identify any major deficiencies within the Licensee's equipment qualification program and to determine whether the Licensee (1) provided an adequate response to the SER concerns, (2) proposed adequate corrective actions to resolve qualification
' deficiencies, and (3) provided a schedule for completion of the corrective i actions.
The evaluations are based on the available qualification documentation provided by the Licensee, complemented in several. cases by other relevant technical information. c The major qualification _ deficiencies that have been identified and the results of the evaluation are shown in the Equipment Environmental _ Qualification Summary Forms (Tables 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4) , presented in Section 4.2. 1 Observations concerning the Licensee's qualification methodology presented in response to the NRC SER are presented in Section 4.3. V Technical evaluations of the environmental qualification of the; equipment
-j items are presented in Section 4.4.
.)
j
, 1 .
'8 4-1
~
- d% '
Ob0U Franklin Research Center
.)
a o. .t ) r es s w
E v
..Y
~
.- . TER-c5257-466
,1
- 4.2
SUMMARY
OF THE EVALUATION
" The following tabulations represent a summary of the results of the
'I equipment environmental qualification evaluation conducted in accordance with the methodology presented in Section 3.
J Table 4-1 summarizes the number of equipment items assigned to each NRC
;d. . qualification category as a result of the evaluation. ,
) Table 4-2 sucmarises the number of equipment items found to have a
,g specific qualification deficiency. _ _ .
.1 ..
11 Table 4-3 summarizes the number of equipment items for which the Licensee
.f has proposed a specific corrective action'to resolve a qualification.
1 deficiency. Table 4-4 consists of Equipment Environmental Qualification .1umeny Forms
~
for the equipment items, identifying (1) compliance with the qualification - requirenents defined in Secti,on 2, (2) the-resultant NRC qualification -* , C--- category, and (3) the , Licensee proposed ~ corrective action. t. < 9
]
i S
.g 6 ' ' ],,
a Y
. ,) . .
me [ . ~.,
,s.
l 4
.e 4-2
. nklin Research Center
. , _.+ , a.. ~~~
i I
, TER-C525 7-466-i
- TABLE 4-1
- d 3 NUMBER OF EQUIPMENT ITEMS IN EACH QUALIFICATION CATEGORY NUMBER OF NRC CATEGORY EQUIPMENT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ITEMS
======================= ==================r=====================================
I.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFIED---------~~~---------------------~~~---- 3 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 50, 61,100 J . I.B EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION PENDING MODIFICATION--------------- 21 ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 2, 3, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 38, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 3 II.A EQUIPM ENT QU ALITIC ATION NOT ESTAB LISHED------------------~~ 69
. C EQUIPMENT ITEM NO(S).: 1, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15, 19, 20, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,
- 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, i 56, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70,
.- , - , J. 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80,.81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 95, 96, 98, 99 1 ' ' II.B EQUIPMENT NOT QUALIFIED------------------------------------ V II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREhENTS EXCEPT
; QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED---------~~ 4
-] [ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 4, 9, 57, 58 1 i
o
! III.A EQUIPMENT EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION----------------------'- 1 3
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 36 1
.. .t.
,z III.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW------------------- 0 IV DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE-~~----------------------~~ 2
;d ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 94, 97 3 TOTAL 100
=======================c=================================================-:======~
4-3 N Franklin Rueamh Center ac , w , re %
TER-c5257-466 N TABLE 4-2 - QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY
SUMMARY
NUMBER OF DEFICIENT EQUIPMENT
~ '
NRC REQUIREMENT ITEMS
============================================================a===================-
1 DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE------------- 68
! ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
' ! 8,.10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 75 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,
, 43, 44, 51', 53, 55, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 85, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 98, 99 3
- 2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITY BETWEEN EQUIPMENT AND TEST SPECINEN ESTABLISHED------------ 4------------------- 24
[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 5, 6, 8, 16, 17, 18, 28, 42, 45, 46, 47, 48, 53, 54, 56, 65, 73, 74, .
. _ _ _ 75,"76, 77, 86, 95, 96.37 -
~
- , .5 2
- 3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADEQUATELY------------------- - 22 ' -
[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 52, 57, 58, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 82 )
~
- 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED (IF REQUIRED)---------------------~~~--------- 22 i
C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 4, 5,, 6, 8, 9, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 42, 52, 57, 56, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 82 )
- 5. PROGRAM ESTABLISHED TO IDSNTITY AGING DEGRADATION--------- 2
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 17, 86 ) .
~
. 6. CRITERIA T.EGARDING AGING SIMULATION (IF REQUIRED)---------------------------------------- 4
, , C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 13, 16, 17, 18 )
. 7. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE CXPOSURE:
) A. - PEAK TEMPERATURE 4DEQUATE----------------------- 0 B. - PEAK PRESSURE ADEQUATE-------------------------- 4
. C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 19, 20, 28, 42 1 -
====e=========================================================================== -
9 m 4-4 n'en Rese
.~ ~ ~_ arch Center .
'i TER-C5257-466
?
l
~i Table 4-2 (Cont. )
QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY
SUMMARY
-i NU.HBER OF DEFICIENT EQUIPMENT-al NRC REQUIREMENT ITEMS
-j ===================== ====================================___===================
f C. - DURATION ADEQUATE------------------------~~----- 0
, D. - REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELCPED ADEQUATELY----------- 0 E. - STEAM EXPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE----~~~~--- 2
[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 19, 20 1
- 8. CRITERIA REGARDING SPRAY' SATISFIED-~~~-------~~~~~~------- 1
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 152 3 -
- 9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBMERGENCE SATISFIED----------------- '
- "=
- 10. CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SATISFIED--------------------- --8 -
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).:' '17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 49,
; $2, 86 3 1.1. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE SATISFIED---------.------ 0
- 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES
} (IF ANY) SATISFIED------------------------------------ 0
- 13. CRITERIA RECARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING SATISFIED----------- 1
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 17 ) 9 14 CRITERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT ACCURACY SATISFIED---------- 0 l 15. TEST DURATION MAPGIN (1 HOUR + FUNCTION TIME) SATISFIED--- 0
.i
- 16. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGINS SATISFIED (NUREG-0588, CAT. 1)~ 0
- s. ================================================================================
- s. .
4-5 - NO Franklin Research Center ' ac%an.re %
- - . - , _ w , _ _ _ - - - ,-om-
6 . TER-C5257-466
.1
~
'4
.i y TABLE 4-3
, LICENSEE CORRECTIVE ACTION
SUMMARY
s.* 1
, NUMBER OF ,
CDRRECTIVE ACTION EQUIPMENT
. DESCRIPTION ITEMS
=================================================.,==============================
i
- 1. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITH QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT--~~-------~~--~~ 3
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S) : 27, 30,.35 1 4
- 2. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATION------------------------~~~-------~~----- 0
- 3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL--~~---~~~--~~----- 0
. 4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMEMr$FROM RADIATION SOURCE-------------
. ---C - -
- 5. VERIFY QUALIFICATION BY ADDITIONAL TESTING / ANALYSIS----------~~ 0
- 6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIRONMENT ========----------- _- 0
- 7. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN P'ROGRESS--~~------------- 0
- 8. OTHER (FOR DETAILED DESCRIPTION SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEMS)-- 61
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13,'14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 2&,
, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51, 55, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 79, 80, 82, 85, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 98, 99 3 t
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) HAS BEEN
, PROVIDED (SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEM FOR COMPLETION DAIEJ-------- 0 4
] ==============================================================================5'=
4 s . G s 4-6 Ubb FrankJin Research Center
. A cw w re wu, .
i e 1 l . ,
.; . .:: w -.:..a..>'.~ ... . . . n . . .. w < . . .. u . .. . . .L..a..w.n. . . , v. a . .
Table 4-4 cc FnplPrim7 rhVglinonal.T AL dtJ ALIFIC AfinN SU*tabT FDPM c=4 L: :
.........................e........................
'I .....e<.......s.. .................s.........................
D I Fpr TuulPNFN1 ITEM 3 ....................................Dumnik3 ......................... 8
!s 194110024003100480051oo6 EU . .1 .hhC
. . .#18HIRENFMTS
.. . 8 0 011 d o..... e l .o 4 . 9. 8... 014 8 P i l l 4 l .T 8 0 8 3 8 61
, y;p 1 ........-....-..
IPE33CNATIDul X . DErlEIENCV4
-....-..-=................-..
8 I l' 8 ( l l l l l l l l l i 3* i ! i ! ! l 4 1 l l 4 8 8 8
,I 1 1. DUCurtNTED EVIDENCE hr OHALIFICATIDn ADr.0UATE=====--======---====l 1 4E l1 1 8 l$
y3 I 3 2, ADEQUATE SIMILADITT PETkEEN EnUIPPELT AND TEST sPECINEN rsTAaLisHtD---------------------------=.- a- ..a-= 8 8 8 l 11 l5 lX l 1 i l 4 8 I & 1 i X 13 33 I 8 8 8 IE II l I I i DF
!
- 3. ACING DEGR AD ATION EVALUATED AbF0UATELV==========================.8 1 4 8 8 8 I $ $x! l ! $ $ 4 l )
F) 3 4. QUALIFIF.D LIFL OR REPLACEMFNT SCHEDULE ' L 1 45 1I i1 1 13 l 1 L 4 1, 13 1 1 I
- I E574nLISHFD (IF RE0UIpfD)--==-*============ .==============-=====l' ) $ $ 1 ) I i 1 8 8 4 3 1 4 I 8 8 8 83 IX &K I I 3$g ! ! 8y 3 I fd 8 i 6.
N
- 5. FhDG AM F3TABLISHED 10 BDENTIFT AGING DECHADAT80h==-=============l I l l l I l .I I I 1 4
3 l I I J I CH31 gala prGARDING AGING $3NU(,ATION 84TI8FIFD lir SEGUIDED)======4- 8 l l l T. CSIIERIA AFCAAnlNG TF PfRATupt/PPE58UME EEP05Uhts 8 8 8 1 l l* ! l !3 $ I & l ! I & 4 8 8 8 1 I I I A. = Pean TFNPERATURE ADiou4TF-----=**=====----=====--***===l l i 3 4 3 1 3 i n. . Pean persspAE ADEcu4TE-.--==....=------ 6 L I I l l a i i I I I I
.....-...-.=== 8 4 l l 1 8 i ! ! ! I l l l l 8 C. . nuRATION ADfQUAfr=======**==============e==============l l j {
8 4 p. = REQUIRED PRHr!LE ENVELOPEb AprQUATELY=========-*-======l 4 $ 1 I l & I I I I i ,l I ! l l l n 4 3 -1 L l I l l I I E. - STFAP EAP0508E Ilr NEAUIPEDI ADE0UATE-=--...' .===.--=..! ! 1 1 8 8 I 8. CPITERIA REGAhDING GPPAY $4TIsrirD=.....=.....--...........-=-...I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ) 1 8 8 9. CPITF.th prGaRDING suhMERGENCE 8 8 g 4 g g 4 g i g g l 'I 8 8 I 10 CrlTERIA RFGanDING pADIATION SATI8FIED-===========-=========--=4 4 4 4 5 1 l- l t 4 1 1 L I I I SAfl5FItD=========-=======-===-==*=-1 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 1 1 I l l 1 I 8 11. Ch87EsIA RFCARDING Tfsf arouEDCE 4ATI&rIED-=========-============l 1
; jf I 12. Cal 1ENIA SECAHntNG TEST FAILUhES OR 8EVERE ANONALigs83F AvTI I I
I 8 ( 8 l l
! 1 l l l
6 8 8 8 8 8 I I 4 8 a4TIsflED----===--=-.-------===-------===---...-==- ! l L i I 4 4 8 1 I 8 i 8 l 8 4 4 l' 1
, 1 13. CRITERIA SEGaLDgnG rHOCTIONAL Tl5 TING SATI$rirD*-============**==8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 4 8 1 l l 8 4 i ! !
I 14. CHITERIA RrGAhDING INSTNUhLHT A CUBACT SATISTIED=---===*-==-=====4 l I ! ! i 15. Trst DupATIUn mANGIn 18 1 Oua , FuhCTION TIMES SATI6FIED-====---==8 L l l l l i 4 4 1 l I
, CPIT 8 8 8 8 I l 8 8 8 8 4 1 I i !
.i.16.......EPIA CAT. 8 8 8 I -4 1 4 8 4 8 4 8 ATGANDING MARGINS 64T35FIED INuPEG-4548....................................................$.1*==--===$...8...8......s..............
8 NHC OHALIrtCATION CATECHAT EDESICNATIONI I . CATECORTl +
........s I
f 4 -..-...................... 8 L I & I L L & I L 4 I l' l 6
...-........-.--.-......-.- I I 1 1.4 ton 3PurhT nual,lrIED--===--------------------------------=====4 1 $ 1 3 8 8 g i l 3 & 3 8 8 3.s 1 i L l l I l & I I I I 1
rnulPxrcT ouAL!r3CATIDH PpNnING manlFICATION.-----------===--I II II & I I IE I pI 42 83 $ aI
& 1 1 i II.A I.0UIP%FNT nuaLIFICATION Nuf ESTABLl3NIDa=================*-==l M I I 3 8 e I II.a EnulPnFtf NOT ouaLir3ED=.--- .- -----------..-..= -===--==-=L 4 8I IE 1 l 7 8 3I I I I i ! I I i I;.C rncipers? SAfisrtrS ALL Rauut>EhENTS EACEPT 8 L l i L 4 l I l 4 i I i i l I I I I 4 8 I i 1 4 8 8 8 4 I I i 8
OHAlIFIEn III.A FoulPnFHT FIFMPT FROM LIFE ut ADPLACrttkT'SCHfDULE JUSTIFIF.D=.-=-=====**=1 4 8 83 1 8 I l 41 8 8 8 i ! $ $ I 04Al.IFICATION--=======-================l l l i l i l I 1 4 & 1 4 I I I III.n Eoultnr;.7 put IN THE SCOPE Or file P E V I E W= =-=====-========*==* 8 I l I IV 8 4 8 8 ) I ! ! I l l l l
..........DoCHarnTAftou quT MA0E AVAILabtr.--------------------..--====l......................................................................I....i....i 8 l I I l l l 8 8 8 1 3 I CDPetCTIVR ArTInN arrCIFILD
.......... 3................................ ,h,l 1 ...... ......-....-=....... (DEstcMATION: 3 . ACTION SPECIFtrDI 1 l i 1 1 1 ( h 8 $ l i l l l 1 4
.................................=. l g 8, I I g 8 4 I i g g i I I I (3 8
- 1. EnulP9Fa7 REPLAcrath? .ITes oc4LIFIFD egulPMFNT----*=====-------==4 I I I I I 8 2. F t.u l PN Ea t nop l F I C A f f or. ..=.-= ...--.. .. .. ...... .....-.. ..... ...... . I 8 8 8 8 I & 4 I &- ! k$
i 3. EhulPerrT *ELnCATInp AA0VE THF & liba re crt CE l.E V Fl..........=......- l 8 8 8 8 I l 4 5 , 8 3 l 3 3 3 g l I I I l 8 8 8 a ! 8 4 4 8 4 ROLdCATF UR Sillfl.f+ EGulr*I'NT I POR SADIATION 80HRCf=========ee=. met i l l i i l 4 8 %4 1 5 Vl'ait Y pu Al.!TICATIDI hi ADDITEDHAL TF& TING /A1Al.V533-*=====--===-=1 8 L 3 L 8 I I l 1 8 I i I 8 6 EnUIPPE4T mLLOCATIDN in A MIiD FhWIFDLAFkT===.o======e--.========l i T. CHALIFICATIvb 7tafft.G nr ELulP>rkT IN PhDCaras...............--..! 1 I 8 8 8
! 3 I 1
I 8 ( 5 l 3 l I I l I l 4 8 l fgg I a n)pe n ( .str. settirIC EQUIPFt NT ITEN Ir CHFCFFD I L l 4 8 8 I l l i ! I & 4 4 I p)=..==========1 j2 3 3 5 8 L II I l l 3 83 13 $I 1 4 8 8 l I I & I I I I i i i i 4 6CHipHip Fue (Orirl.6.?Inr of Ct4NFrftvr ACTIh*18] HAS Ptf N PSOVIDF l a.* ! ! l l
& L 3 8 a
[ t i I i l
........................................................................!............................................l 4 5 1 4.
9 I .
i t f. s t .f s
- fq[p1O ^$ L ( % 41#
- h a4 s8eiggg 4
o e0 s 1iI&1I13i18iI831It:I8 si!il3I8Ll83 a1I1j1I4I3Iigs e s u3 n e 3 s a e a s n
- s sn -
s s
' a si.gg1i834lI8I14Il4iI83lIl831 a1!gl3Ii s s sw. s l34e1i8l1I318!IIs s s e e
s2 sp 3 s : s e s 1e a ss . gg1i3838l8I611li gI1ll1Ill1 nti e a s t sy . s 8Ii8l134 oii8i1I131I!I e s nf . a: 3 s s 3 3 s
- s s s aa. e e e a s3 s1 .siglgg311lIIll 8lIi48ll1Illl siI881ii1133 s;18I1&i35I!l s s e
- s. a2 a a 3 s A 4 s
e a sn s s s st s n a5 ggi38311III1g3i!g!lll1iIIl sgI381iI1ll8 eI1I8IIII4tl: s n m e a3o2 . n
'. sF se.
sS st ggI a m X s e A s s g33l1III18 aI!Il3318g4IL ea&il1i!l1ll e11IlII!I4iI4 e aP e5 s s s
.' - srs2 . 3 s 1 s s s * ; sH ou e' a a ** m3 ggigI4118811l3* i a
- s s4
.i!4l3I84I sllgl1iii1ll s1!8Ii8IiII3s s s s sM s2 s
- e 5 e 3 e
. aEan.g sT mt g(1i338L881j8liiii3llI41& sIiI18I4t3Ii e41tlI88II3I1 s s s s sS e8 . a n e s2 a s e s?s0 5 e a s s s s
. sh s1 ggII14&848Il(4gIiI4gIil41l aIi181I4[llis3lI{I88i8t11 e
; el e2 s .' s lI n s
. a3 3 s 1 e s s sl mo e L. eI s8 m a sH s8 .s g gI3a4i1L8!l34{Igll13Lg13( eIi:5iI838tl o1lI1&4llI4 s 1e sQa3 3 s s I s X o 2 s i
aFmo. a m e r s s et !gLl Ps afsn 381ILlil41[I8i188IIiiI m8Itll8I44I1 e a4l!lL8il4I11 ss i e se a2 E s y 8 I X s 1 s e
# s srmns e e s s a m8 V a s
s s a9 .s I gII43:8Ll3l$l(1l1i88l4t4l a sItIL4i4lIl slil&&llII13 a n s s
. s1 . & 1 A & a 6e 1 e a a.
+s s
a m m sa. at sa I 3i3iILIiI3(34(il4I8ll3II( e1IlIi3llIIls s s e1 s LI4lIilI314s s ua e al ay I ; e e s E s X e As . s a so.Igt at giIII4i11lI$Ig4488l4III s1Ll m .
!l3i(IIl n1L88(1IlIi54 e
s s
) na o s s sel i s..
e s aE IEI I e a
. lnme 3 X e E m t l s s
sa se.g st gI8! ii&4l8{I{II41l8i8I8I e3l1lt81t8i{ s s e i4l!18{!I&8 e e n aa rs n e6 . sl ,Ry k s n e s e> o i
- 3 I s
-g e a . 4 s 3 s -
s sn C m m( s a .. I g l. at ( ea gts . .e I 1
= I.'t81
= I.l48 1(Ig1t5
- . - . = = -=
3L8I.8I. s ga I l - 8 = ! - 1 = l ' 8ll t.= - = esI84!.!.14 4
= = = t.!.lIl - - s 'e e f ;l .
' . h 1
p s - -- -. .= = . = = = = - . . = = - = = = . m
= . - = = - - = - - = = = m
. = - . . - s < = . . . = .. sn
. - . . = . sl = = = = . = = *
= . a=L ue ,. - = = . = = . - = .
er. 4 -
- oe s
- -."**=.=.=...=..
- . . = = = . = = = ==
- = = = e
.e == == = = m s
- . = . . . = . = sr - =. == == ..- =. .. -
pe a gs s 4 l.s s = . = = . ) . . = = == = = = = s - -
= = si. = = . = . - ne
. = = - . == - = er. = . - = . . . is #
A e a = . = - D . . = = - . . = = - = . =
- a ma =
.) . . = .- a fs e ec. . .=. .
1 s - - f . . = - - . - . = . = . = ) a- . = - . . . - 1s s . . = - - p . . = . - . . . = = - = 4 m sp
- = . = = . oe l t a .T = - p . = . = . - - = . = . - - - hs .
. , b rs os
.C- i . = =-
s rr .-
- - l
- u
. . = . - . . = =
= . = . . . . = - - - E . sr-sl - . - - =
- - = . .
ee. ss.
. . = - . . - * . rs
. - e n =. . .*-
a . = . o = - - . = . . . - - - 3 - - . = . p= = s - . = . = l . ms re . - . t = - = . = . = . . 3 rA Tea. sn = - . . aa = - . rs T i k sn .s C3 - . s = . = . = . = =
=
u e 3 . - . -
- . . Nrs = = - . . - . L=
= = - . = = E.
I
- 3CsG-
- 3 T ,
. . . =
a E .- - - . . r== sT t = = 3 = -
= =
= = = - r3 - .
.Ti. = = . o3 . *
= 5. - t. a es V.8 s ts
.r. l p
= . . . D3t = = = . - . = - - A - hA4 sA - - N - - t = - = eC = = Lh7 . p se s
= . - I(p = TE * . M - otS0
. Ts a
E
= = - T u.= LT . = O ti 5 n eC.- . . O-I - - Ps
- Tt. - = sA
=e
.- = se
. = ful 7= vhA .St
- r A s Hs H s ra
.s
. . 4 4
e.T = . . AD5 - =
- EA
- = = DEO
- = = AIP
=*
= . T
= = = N - if)0e-
. . = - F5E = s Ao u . . == = A . 6l MGs1 -
- T.
A
- Eu
. CJ= w=s - 4 F == Lf.SnA == S. 7i c ) se Ha CO=X = . ea - M = N/ 8H ss C *
= E E. == vIr.s
- = - RrX .
- Ul DE.3fI f s - P EDGfGC t e Pm I s
. s un-
- GSE*
- 3p- . .rR . TATA es - -
. I . . IEFH= e sl - ! Cf PNA p s Ps 0a
.e.tu sn nA - .
II DTE = = - 0
= = - 6 A.D.rVE E - S AS He N > v a
a..n1uL l3.Sha = - Tn1p r=n
.=
ea u = t' fI LNr o=rATPP3 8 0s e 9 m ai A f- bL f E. . AM = = - A) - lDsE-D rrIS - GCI TO( sl Nrn r.sr si t=G!&E 1 s f A .- rr kU GSu=.= k s=
- 3IT - NATDeA -
sT - -
- mB. A fhI HCTi .
eA D=EA
= PnrnhM TntE Cs 0 E .- s A e
.N
. toer At TD-.I 4sE.
- GOtT rp
= Pt 3rA8 uTs30.SCuret IpCEsN - =
Tul;t sG - GT-n S.F.&AT p C t. en lp.L ! . - E
- p i LvTI T :s e s sS .
.e GI fr.LC-At Up - AIaA Cu.p. r S .- r b r :tA = vksL3hP TPUE=Lo3STr5 f8/OT = rrr
= DurAI Acr.TA ECr$ss- . b I sr- -
= i F
- Hkrol .ts.r.r i T I r A. .
- Drt t. -
pnA HD 6uhEEf ap va im
, D
( . FE I n.AT.TkpAQ . !ueDU= a IC EH LT
+Teo
& sf hT.fFbEA.re.u
- tO
- PN - ArAPV e(
l . l A
=
t' F3pP H Tl3r l. P r. Ts Ce rm
; s I . N = rrTNnUL .ANR&s . rUOA s u*TTIi4P F m
. LN =pE .N3 T rE 3&Eo0I - REU e e na AE=rP . E34EDTE(ss;t0A DHO3n na. D.L LLaGC SEs H = iLD
- UDm0l 4u us uFDTT)D 8pAAL f3F- EUH4 e ir .APm Ds T vMAA o Cs uktnCrIG1u NPTEGrp4 nB7T U I r. 7 la. A TR I e . Tf fuEA a I . e e P tr n THuAr CT$Gs DA re rrSLLE0I OeIA Pl 7 G r" R H D e s P u AAkrnunrD$SpuS(h rEEuk A nn= eT =E" ?l4I4 I.&RRHmen.W t L t' FT s r tet - ?G tilu E
. mIfnn HAUNT D :a ;GI-C om e
, LVEu ATE Fg&APo3SDTTIrIHP su=rrruf vTNnnrgILoA ns
.s . :TRFR s qD P r l sr PIuei Efn sNr noIt ns CTA EEGGpENoA GGGGGsGCcGeE. gLL IrM mC mg74AR HNNrantFnWP tu5UD SIITPia tlIINNt IfII N anW sT -
al sA aaAfTrETuet uuuuAiX t -
- MA3D.f7Sr FCTti1TC C] Ara 4Et i
T s e
. n A.t I
rI rIpD TEILpRRE4uannRNasPR TlmnDDDnA DDpDeC R s - oOOa3LEMI u sa.l sr. A. rCircTS
! t Lm
- s. e s nWii Pe vieAf( BAA AA acraaA A4 A A uA sn- T 4 a. = . PDLArbnE s
, , - E:l rPi A G G E E u E T c G G G G l G G n G a o- .aHgtie t T :rrIfEp
?Eu; :
T T D T 7. f . ni s ST.oSIR P ImALDTt E$sa EPPppMrEtEryrrtEsi.rrP .I n.rnE trn0 p n F r l,aI8 - ra a
.r r CGf Hr =. pPpRasppfMsf. a 4 ea aPPrHrMdt eT .
PPPeP!rrpsC TTT eA u7A T pe e TEEEr5 A 4
- s. H g . WTrPi1 RI3 . . . . .AAaAA AApA ec.lIltILftusA ItglIrI3uI si.u4uuUA4uce HHfi E r r.E T u 0 f38C ns rs -
. so . eA s rLARpAnCnEpneaPIRppR sr.09onnU0nonE H arAfpr e st nu CIBEEg iEgrE(EL Eei EFtEiQEft sV - PPPCrP1y En g
. e.
.e u.CrsI u u f-NA n . 0pLGH3ahR l C1 ATplI T tTTTT llIII eaRRN TTfTsb.
!tsI ea -
ppLHnu. sI = 1ll nalI t eT - eC unrqLrnt!T
- u. u L p u A H Ls ps C6PCC CCCCC CCTCeq= he A. H.
D.0ATA C .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n c . s - A. 0. I I A. n. r. II sr sp - EEEwW EOO ts ue p 561 990I2 I IIt em . . . . . ... Cs g
.r.82 34 345eaa 1IIII III eo 4S6T8 ss 1I1 111t sh-s sC.123 s
e e I1iIi!3ll81I4iii88i8l1iiIa aI1I!8iIlI4Ie:IlI11I4I4!I s 8
. 0 ga0 7,3=
=- q gee y3EuE 3ggg:
0 r g)mRq . sg g g* =
' e ' ,
- n. . . . . ~ . . . ;. : .-..:..' . , .
.~ v , . .; .. Lu. ~ ( .- R .~ . .w. . . ~ ...:..
Table 4-4a (Cont. ) ) . . q, t uplP%HT E.Vl6 pre.t r1 Al. 0988 8) Ir& Tips: Sum At T popp ggg .......................... ......................e
,M .............................................................
I FPC roHlenF.af turn enensas E ./ ............................................s................ Rollin32l pal 5801640874 e lp lolg in4e lel.l t e 4 7 8 Ne lle44 t o4 5 5 [3[g
, .....................................................................s.......... 3..leletal .............................. .................
I kpc St4HIAF.*ttHTS lbf.dlGNATlphs 3 . OrricianCT! l l i i p;p 4 4 1 g g 8 3 g i I 8 i ..==............ -.......-...==.............-- I 1 3 $ 1 t i I : $ , ,i ! , I my 1 1. DOCupFNTgp EvipanCC or ouALgrlCAfinh AprouATE===- ====...*-..-===! I 11 13 iA 8A $ .A 8g Ia3m4ai ga8a1 1 e i 2. ApruuAft $5HILARITT pEfrtth fuulPnFLT AND 1 8 8 I t ! [ l 8 j l I i l I 4 3 . I TL S I S PECI HL H ES T A 4L I SHt D== .*==..== -===.=.=-.===..=.-=== - $== eel ! ! ! l I t 8 8 l l l E I l l A I OF l ). AGING OFCSADATIue IbaLuATED Al.couATLI.1-~====...==================t i ! t 8 i t i i 8 I ( i $ $ () 1 4. OUAL!rIED Lirt 04 prPLACFv818T SCpt ouLt 85 1 1 1 8 i l i I 8 8 1 1 l 3 I i 1 Q l raTADLI9hre (Ir PE0pIRrpl=.-== ..===........---.=...==.---..... .I t i 4 3 3 3 1 8 8 8 4I I I i 1 g i S. PRuGRAM ESTAPLl3HEb TO 3DLPTIrv AGING DLCRADATION..-.=.. --====.-l i I I i ! i i i l' I i ! I I I
% 1 6. CHITIFIA prGANntNG AGlhG &IMULATinN SATI5firo (IF BE0ulprDi==*..*1- l l l l 8 8 8 I i i
- 7. CkIlfkl4 REG 4kpING TfMPLAATupr/Ppf350pE E3PospaEs 8
l 8 8 8 1 g i ) i I 4 g; 3 ; g g 8 g i i 8 l A. = PEAD TEMPERATU.E A04QUAfr=======*.*****==*--.======.===8 I I l ! I I' I ! ! 4 I l i L a t p. - PLAN PatssHat AutuuAfr--*.-========.-==---=======--====8 1 $ i 8 3 8 I I I & 41 8 I 1 l 1 C. = pupAfinN AngouATE-====-=**----..====-==-----------.....I I I 1 1 1 1 4 4 8 I I I I I *I l D. = REnulpED Ph0 FILE FPVELnP6D ADEOUATFLV-.==========..==.=1 I $ i i t i i *I ! ! ! ! ! I $ 8 F.
- STFAN E X POSUME I l r F EGu l hEpl ADF.uu Af f ====...==..======= 3 8 l l l 1 1 ( l ! ( ( ( ! ! (
l S. CrtTEntA prCapplNG SPpAT 84TI5Firo...- =======.=======...-=======l { 8 8 8 8 4, 1 I I 8 I I I 4 8 8 9. CPlfe r sA7'artre....-=====...=.=....-= .at 3 4 l l 1 8 i g 8 i i 8 l l 8 80. CplTF.in84 ptGARol4G 6UppFNcf0CL REG 8hDING RADIATIDH 3ATISFIFD==**=*.=*========.*====**==8 l l I i 3 l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 l s 18. C6tTLRIA pFGARh!NG TF67 $Louf.hCE SAfl5 Fir 0***..--====.-====*=====4 l j' 8 82. CplTLpIA DFGARDING TEST FAILuhf6 Op 3LVI.AE ANUPALlt3 j (Ir ANT! 3ATI5r!FD===..--==.--============.-. ===... 8 I 8 I
,8 I
8 I I I ( I l I 4 i l 1 4 8 i 8 t 1 1 I 1 t 1 yo ==.....=1 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I 1 8 8 I I 1 8 53. CasflHl4 NFGApptgG l'uhrfluhAL TESTING SATISrIF0=======..=========8 1 te. CalTERIA RFGADDING INSThuNth? ACCupACT SAT 15FIED==========-======4 8 l 1 1 1 1 1 ? $ i 3 I-8 4 ! & 8 I I 4 8 8 8 g 8 8 8 l l 1 1 8 15. TEST puMATION MARGIN (l HOUR . ruhCTinN TIMF1 84TI5FIEp===-=...==I I & 8 8 8 8 I f I 4 8 8 8 l 8 8 16. CegT DEGARDluG MARCIN3 84TI5FIFO (NhhEG=0508 CAT. 1)===..==-8 l l i
..........FnI.A ... ........................................
8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 1
............... .. ..................................s.....e.....s.......s...
1 4 8 I hoc GuAlIrtCATION CATEGDHT (DESIGNATIDHS I'm CATEGHPfl i I 4 8 8 8 1 I I I l ! ( .I I i . .g I .-.---..=.......-=........ ........==..==.=... ......= -g i g g i g i i i i g i I g i 8 l 3.A FOHIPMF4T 00ALIFIEp========..-==.......-=========...........-! l 4 8 8 4 ( l I & 1 1 I I l 8
. 8 I.5 LuulPrrnT cuAL!rICATInN PtholHG MpptrICATInc..====-...====-==4 8 I I i i 1 Ia1 1 I i i t ei , 8 II.A r.oulPPEPT GUALIrtCATIuP b uf F 5 7 A R L I $ N r D= =..........-=--===== = 8 3 l I $X 4E 4X ! !5 I &I 1E 1N 88 8 I Ik 8 8 i II.D '.A u t P m ru t po r 4 u a L I r t r p=. = =. .... = = =. -= .. . -= =......=. ..===.... ! l i j 4 I l 4 8 8 g g i l i l 4 II.C IculPMENT SAT 13rlE3 ALI. pLonIntrFHTs raCEPT t I ( l I L ( l l & L 8 i t ; I I HH AI.lFil p I.lFK t p REPLACtrENT SCHt.DuLE Ju$71rtrp.==-..=.....-l 1 3 [ t 8 i g i 8 i ! ( l 4 I I Ill.A E041PPLi4T F AForf FPUN 0UAbittrATInn....==....=....=..........I, I i 8 3 g3 g g i l I 4 I $ 8 8 8 III.s
- laulParn? Nof IN TNr scuPE er THr SEviEN.............=-.....=4 i l I i g i 5 1 I g g i i g i IV pncuprHTAT[nu put mADE AtAILAPLC=========*.......--=========.
....................................s.............................s....8 ..8 ......................sy( . . sl . . . ...l ' . . .l . . . .l..e...e.....
l l [ 8 8 8 8 8 4
. ...8 ,,
8 CorpErfavE Action SPECIFIEh trEslGNATIpus A . ACTinu $PErIFIFu) 1 ! I l l l I i i 4 l 1 1 I I I I [ 3 ...........-=..=.-......... =...=........-..=.-......-.... .... I 1 g i g i i i i g i g i l i g o i I. toutrpEST arPLACFmEuf rITH QUALIFirp EqulP9FNT=....---.-=.-...-..I $ 4 8 8a4 4 8 8 1 1 1 4 3 1 4 1 2. Es-ulr.Luf Hopir CAflDP.-....-====.======- ...-====..-======..*===l ! I l l [ t 8, t I i 8. EoutrirHT Ril,0CAfinH AhudL THr*Sup9raGrHCL br.yrL...............==8 4 1 3 8 8 $ (n 8 8 i g i 8 8 g 8 g 3 g g l 1 4 4 4 HELHCAfr op sillEl.0 EnulrnENT rpon manI ST Inn 5ppnfr==.-- . -=.-...! $ $ 1 3 4 8 8 I I g i i i ! i 1 8 5 VEplFV pHAbtr3CAfl0N OT APDITInaAL TFATING/AN48.ypla..==.--==....=1 8 8 L l l 4 & 4 I I I I t ! I E' 1 6 roulenenT psLOCATION to a FILD r.hylpOhat97.-=.... ...=.-==.-= .--! ! I I l l l i ! l l I t T. CHALIFICATlik TEATahG of' LpulenthT IN PhpGpF.38 .....====....=====4 1 I l l l 8 1 l l [ 8 l 3 l i
! ! I I h[
! 8. OTHtR (. 38.E AFFCIFIC 00ulPHEMT ITEM 1r CHECFID.=L)***===....=.=1 I II iA 85 8 A I IE II 4A 1 N ! A I i 1 1 I i 1 l I I I 1 1 4 i ! l ! ! 8 1 1 1 I GCHt:lul1 f HR C04fl.ETIGH Dr C0hRFCTIvr ACT 80185) slas arr.A rp p u l t.rp.-. g g g, g. I g g g g i g g g i g g
.s..m.s..........m..es............m....m..s.....sa.ses.a...m...........m.....m.........m..s....................e..s...e.s....s...s..
- e f .
e t . e
, p- >: .
w:,N, . ..i ~ l. .N. S. i wa.:..i L.2.wk S.a. . 4.2::U h l. 1( W , L a. . , ' .
.. L ~. .,
a Table 4-4 (Cont. ) t on PesTY fnvlopasts.TAL nHastrieAsine. soneArt esan er, s ................................................ u=> CC'
> .y [
g i rur FuusraswT t rre runns os 3 ............................................................. 1 P46 8 4 418 048 8 049 8 06p 3 0$ 18 452 8 05 3 8 05 410S5 t hil l e%18 0%h l bSe g os.n 3 y? ta .................................................................................................................................... i Nhc klaHIFEMLNTS E DrulGil A TInu p 1 . PFFICilprV) ! l 8 4 4 8 4 3 4 4 8 4 4 i 1 l . p:0 g 8 ......=.-=...... .--.- -........ ..---.....=.- g g g 4 g g g i I g g i g I 4 g e i 1. pHCHMrmTrp EvsnEuCE cr nuAs.IFICAT30s ArrouAfr---=============.-= 4 5 1 1 8 4I ! IaI I I 8 3 I l p ie4
% 1 2. AlitupAfr SIH]LARLII PETWLLh roulPMEtif App t i I 4 l l 4 I l 8 i l I 3 3 i i Tr5F 3PFCIMFw F5TABLl3HtD-=====..===.....========. ,.====---======liX!!I I I 4 8 1 1 43 3a1 33 g 3 I I l Sr l 1 3 1 X $
4 3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALuAfib ADlQUATFLVe====****========*-========l 4 1 3 8 3 3 1 1 4 4 5 3 l 4. QUALIFIFD LIFE OR PEPLACf.1ENT SCHtPULE m . it 14 I l ( t I l 8 () i ESTAbbl5HFD (Ir REupIRED)......=........=.-----......=.-======--*1' l 8 I 1 I 1 I i 88 I 8 I 3 i 3 l 4 iA 8 A i i ! . 3 l S. P5n4 RAM FSTADLISHFD TO IDE>T1ri AGING DIGDAD4TlHN========*===-==al 4 4 8 8 8 8 I i 1 8 8 4 5 .8 8 { 8 6 C55TERIA nFGAnntmG AGJuG sinuLAT30m SATl5FIED IIF pinulmED)=..===8- .l l 8 8 3 g ( l 3 I g i 8 3 1 1 1 7. CRITTPIA RFCAAptpG TEMPl.pATUAE/ Ppt &&Upf EXPOSUSEg 8 3 4 I $ 3 J ( l 3 3 l 1 8 l l . - 1 A. - Pl.AK TFFPERAiUPE A0t'UUATE--============================8 8 4 4 8 I I i 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 . I n. = PEAh PRES 50EE ADEGUATI>.====-=======-===========..=====l 8 l i l I i 4 4 l l 3 $ 4 8 1 l C. = nuantloa ADEcunfr-- ............--=----....=---.=.=----l. <t i 3 I i ! ! t 3 8 8 8 8 8 p. . m EnuinFP PaarlLE ra vrt. ort h Aprou A T E LT-. =...... .=-----I g i l i I 4 1 8 8 3 : 1 I l '8 I E. = 576Am ThP08URL (Ir IE0H;al01 AGEQUATE=========-======= 8 4 8 4 3 8 8 1 3 4 1 1 1 8. I I ( l 8. Cattrela pEnagnihG $ PRAY &ATISFltp===== .== ==***================8 8 8 8 8 8 33 l 4 8 3 4 4 I I 1 f, I 9. CPITEN I A ATL A p o l uc suP ur.ncEntt s A13 6F' Sp-----==- ...----.=---==-. B $ 8 8 l 1 1 8 4 I I 3 I I I I I 80 CeITFRIA PFGARDING RALIATION 6ATI5FIED==========================*4 I. 8 IE I 1 8E 4 i 8 l l l 8 !* 8 ! S' 4 11. CHITEp1A RFCAHDlkG 1F57 SEQUrbCe: 5ATl5FIED==***=..=============*=1 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 $ ! I l l l 8 8 1 I 13. CplTEMIA arGAhnipG TEST FAILUAF.s on si. vent AnoPALIFs 4 4 I 8 8 I i 1 l l 1 8 3 8 8 8 i C3 I IIr A1VI s&fisFIE0*==---.----===*----==-------=----===-----=-1 4 4 8 8 8 8 4 1 8 4 4 8 I I I l 13. CplTipla pFGapn!"C FUNCTiuhAL Tt& TING 84T15FIED.======= ..=======4 3 l l 8 8 8 l 1 3 4 4 4 8 8 1 1 14. CHITIRIA PFCANDING INST 8HMENT ACruRACI 4 8 8 I I I I i j 3 ,3 1 l l 1 1 15. Tt37 DURATIHW MA# GIN fl HOUP e IUPCTinNSAT.ISFIED==..-============8 TI E) SATI5FIFP==========l 8 $ $ 8 8 8 l l 3 3 8 I l 8 I i 16 Cp4TaalA nFGAppING =AEGINS 6Afl5FIFO (MupEG.0$st I i 8 I I i ! 8 l l 3 8 I 1 a... m..es .sa.es......se........... ....s ........... . CAT........I.l========1....I ....se... ses ....sa..ess.ess sa.. ...............ess.mmessa.sames 8 Mkr CHALIFICATip1 CATEGnp1 (DF35GwATIOH8 Xe CATEGUPT) l I 4 4 4 3 8 8 8 3 8 3 1 1 I l og t g ...-=.. -... ..... ...- -. .-......................-.. i g g g g i g g g g g g i g g i 1.A LOUIPPFht 0uAl.trIEP======.....===.-============.-===.-===-===8 4 $ 8 13 1 1 g 3 I l 3 l l 3 i L 1k (OHIPMEi.T ouALIFICATluh ri kp l HG rhD I F I C AT I n8:=== ..--.-......= l 3 83 33 83 3 3 8 3 1 3 I g i 3 g 3 4 l II.A ECDIPhl fit GU Al.IFIC ATlhh huf E5TABLISHFD+e=====--===e*========l ! I I I II IE IE IE iX II I I IE I 1 I 1 II.n EnulPPE1T NOT GUALirIE0===--= ----==========--...........--==8 3 4 8 4 3 4 3 l l l l l l 3 8 j i II.C (nHIParn? SATt5FIES ALL P90ussEl.F.uTS FICFPT -48 8 4 I I ( l ! 8 3 1 I g i i 1 I Qu Ahlrlto LIFE DA DEPl. A(FrEl'T 8CHEDUI.E JUSTIFIEp***====---===l I I l 8 8 1 1 8 8 8s4A 4 I i i Itt.A EQUIPMElT FIEMPT fRun 0unLIrICATlum--=================-======8 4 l l 4 8 8 3 4 8 8 8 3 4 I i 138.4 TuulpPtHT Hnf lu THE SCort ur THE nEviEw-..-=-=-....=-....=--I l 3 8 3 3 4 3 8 g i i g I g pg i Iv encurFnTATION h07 #ADE AVAILADLF.....-.........-- ..---..==..I g 4 1 3 3 8 3 3 3 8 l td
.............e.e........................e.......................................................es.1..s.3 1 ClpHECTIVE ACTION SPrCiflLp II-ISIGN ATinns I e ACTipH SPl.CIFIFL).+8 l l 8 I l 8 a ..3 e ..8 .as...............
3 3 ) i I e l pd 4 8 8
} , 3 ===... ==......-...--.-.-- .., .....-.--.=........---.......-...I. .g g g g g g g g g 3 g g g I g (n '
1 1. F0UlPNENT ptPLACrMENT WITH GUALIFIFp rou3 Pat:hT===================8 3 1 &* 1 1 & 4 I i 1 1 4 8 8 3 ha 8 2. FoHIPaFHT r0ntrar4Tinn---.= ---- ===.-.--==--=-- ...---......-===8 3 8 8 3 4 3 I g 8 3 3 4 g i I La l l l l I %J l 3. LOLAPNEt.T DF.LucAflG4 AdHVE Thr SubMEp6FNCE I.EWFL-================3 1 1 3 1 3 3 4 3 8 l 4. StLncATE na suggl.n l'uuIPMEFT SAOn mADIATION SDHDCF=-*******====-al 3 I $ $ $ 8 3 I I l l 8 3 4 8 I f, I S. VERlti pHALIFirATIUN DT ADDITIDI:AL TF875NG/AMALTSI 3 4 I ! 8 8 1 1 3 8 3 4 3 I I cn ). 8 6 EDUIPrE1T PCL4f ATIGH 10 4 F i l p l H v 3 p pge n E n ?-=.=....'5 = = = =
.......--.-=.=.3 = =-= == g= = = g
- l g g I
g I 3 I I g g I g I 3 4 g I g I I g I I g I gg i 1. QU A8 3F IC ATIO1 TE5T!aG Or EQUlrMIFT Ib P90 GAL 58-====-========--===1 4 4 8 , I a. IITHfD ( 4EE SPFCIFIC Iqual*PLIT Iffr II CHECFlp.. 3=====*=======4 A 3 E Ia44 8 iX 8 4 I I E I I I 8 8 8 I 1 'l & I I l 3 8 8 8 1 1 I I i 8 I 1 ACHilblF SUN COMPT.ET10m DF COD 4rrTIVt' ACTIN 9(SR HAS h8IN FF Hv il4 Pa== 8 8 8 8 8 8 l l 1 8 3 4 4 3 i 'l
...e....asessness.easse.saessessassses.massessesessessa. esse..seessa..es.as.... ease...ases.seesses.een.esessa smose.comsmassessee .e t 4h y 9
g 4.
* . 1 e
' , r
.. t L
l e *
- f. . .
. . , or .e
- +
. Table 4-4 .(Cont. )
i FOUjPrENT thylpupHEHTAL ouakgFICAfinn sumnAmy F0mm
,7; cru s. eses..esosases.nesessene.. mess.eee.a....se.es..
.E.,1 ....s........e.........................s.......s.............
g i FAC F0HIPMF47 ITFm hurnfas I o .......e.......e...................................es.es..e.. 62 so [E ...............................................s............s.........s.806880.......80611064806510668061106p106910101018801280TituT480154
.........se......................e...s..............
2J ! WhC Rf0H,lpEMENT5 lbt&IGNATinN3 I . DFFICIENCT) g i I l -I t i I 4 [* I g g g i 8
. /g ..---. -......-= ---...--..-.----......=.--... I I I I i : i 8 4 : 1 I I i i
'n . 1. DUCUhrgTFp EVIDENCE OF OVALIFIC;fl0p ADFOUATE--.**-======---=====4 8I II g3 4 8a43 43 83 43 i aia!p is$1 8 U i 2. ADEQUA1E sitILAniff SETwtLN EQUlrath7 AND 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 4 4 8 1 1 4
.5 (( t Ttst 3PEClern EsTanclsafu---.---------.-------------=------------l- : I ai i l i i i 8 xia4: 8 i I J. AcikG OtcaADATION E V A Lu A T E D A Di o U A T E L Y-----= ===.---= = =.-.-------- g 4 8 8 8 j 8 8 8 4 4 4 4miA Ial l()
3o 8 I
- 4. ouAktrlEP LlFE na pfPLACEMih7 &CPEDULE F6TAsl.lshFn llF ntoulnED)...-.-.-- ..--.----.-..--------....--==.8
'l' 3 4
I I I g i I 1 I 8 4 8 l 8 g I g l i I 8 4 3
; aisIal I I T 4 S. PROGDAM ESTADLISHED TO IDEpilFV ACING DEGRADATIOh *--- ---------.! 4 4 8 1 1 I & 8 i 'l i I I i 8 8 6. Caltrata nFGARDING AGING SIHULATION SAfl5FIED IIF pt0UlpFDI=====.8 3 1 j i i i g ! ! ! 4 8 8 8 g i T. CalT&alA REGARDl4G TEMPEDATupt/P8E38USE EXPD30 pes l l 4 8 8 8 I; I I & I i 8 8 8 l l A. - PEAK TEMPERATURE ADf0UATE*======********-------******--l' l 8 1 8 8 8 8 8 I I I I I I t I b. - PEAR PRES $USI ADF0UATE-.....-- .=====--..=.-== -==-----I' I i ! l 4 g i i I g i g i i l l C. - PURATIDM ADF4UAfl --------======--======== ---= -=----=4 g 8 4 i i 8 I i ! 3 4 ,8 8 8 l I 4 p. = REQUlptD P90 FILE ThWELOPED ADEQUATELY .--==============8 8 8 4 4 3 8 3 3* 4 I l 8 I I I 8 E. - sTEA= c PosUar gir PEQUlpEDI ADEouATE-.-------------..-l : 1 I I I I I I I I i i i i 1
} l 8. Calfrala pFGAuntuG 3 PRAT 5ATisFIFD=====================--======.=1 8 I I 4 8 l ji i I g 8 3 8 8 3 4 9. CplTERIA REGASDt4G aurafaGEnCE 3ATi&FIED----=------------ ....-..I I l 8 8 3 l l 8 8 : 8 4 4 4 8 8 10. CPIIERIA PFGApolNG RADIAT10h 3ATi&FIED.-===-===* -=.-=========-.-l 8 3 3 $ 1 8 l l 8 [ I i I I l 55 1 II. CalTEplA REGARDING TF87 stourhCE 5&TISFIED**=======--=========--.8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 4 g i i t I I
), 8 32. CHITEulA BFCARDING TEST FAllUHF8 OR SEVFRE AhonALits 4 g i 8 i ! I g i g i I
4 I 4 g I I I I , p. I lif ANT) 84Tl3FIED============-===.-*.-=====*---=====-*=====.) 1 8 8 8 8 8 4 I I 8 8 ( II CRITrulA DEGApplNG IHr.CT80hAL TESTING SAfl6FILP-==--====***=--. -l 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 I l 8 I I I I i 14 ChlTE a la p r.Gr apihG t haTsunENT ArrWR ACT S ATI5FIFP=== = .. - E=====l l I I I 4 1 4 8 4 I I 4 l l 8 8 15. TEST DHNATIbu NARGIN ll MuuR e FUaCTIDh TIME) 4AT15FIF.D--*=---===8 8 8 8 I i ! I l i i l I $ ! I i 16. CalTERIA NFGAnpl4G mApCIks &ATIsflED leuaEG=0588 CAT. 11===-**.-l 8 4 4 5 1 ( l 8 l 4 I I I I I seeessenessessenessessesemessesse...eeeees........ee.. ..e eesseessessessassenessessenessesseensseesessessessenessesseessessesessnes
+ 8 put GUALIFICATIUM CATEGOAV (DE31GNATION8 3 e CATEGonT) 1 4 8 i i 8 4 i 8 1 8 i 1 1 8 8 8 .....==-=......---.=..---. .........--....-.---.-....= : 1 I I I I I l , 1 I i i 1 : 1 I I.A En p l P a sw f 0 p A L i r l l e- .......-- .- .-...--.--. . -....-.--- .---.--- g g i i g g i g 8 i I 4 8 8 4 3 l l 1.5 EnU IPrFNT Ois A LIr gC AT a on Fg:ppinG PODIFIC AT80N.--====.===-===-el 1 i I { l l l i i i t ! ! 8 8 8 II.A FOUIPPFhT OUALIFICATION NOT F37AFLISHFD=====.--===-**========4 81 4I 8A l E !# 41 45 lI I E IR l 3 4& 2I 1# 4 4 II.D Enu1PnrHT mnf 00ALirlED..------------------------ ==...---..-l I I 1 8 8 I I i 1 8 8 8 8 I i I li.C 50UIP3E.l? SAftsFIES ALL ELOUlpEnFhTS l.XCFPT I l 4 i l 8 l 1 1 ! l I I l 8 8 I QUALIFIEp I.trE DR hFPLACFnFAT 3CHFDubE JUSTIFIED ======-======8 I I I I l 8 8 I L 4 1 1 1 8 8 I Ill.A E4uarathT FREPPT FROM 0UALIFICATIOK-======*.----=========*---t 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 I i 1 I lit.b EQUIPMFut Muf lu THE 8CDPE OF THE BrviEW --=====.--===== -- -l 4 8 8 8 8 8 4 3 4 4 4 I i i i g i IV pnCunesaTATinn mot PArt AVAILaptE------....-- .--.==...-------! 3 l l 8 i #. I Ii l 4 1 I i l 8 rd semesseessessessassesseesseessenessesseassemeassessessassoassessessosasessessesesssessesseessessmejenessseesssassessessassessasses p3 8 CompECTIvr ACTlHN SPICirtro (CESIGNAfinHI Ie ACTIDW SPECIFIEDI 3 5 8 I 8 8 4 8 4 I I I I I 8 .........- .........-...-.- --.--......- ..--.....--.........-- , I ,8 4 I ,I ,I , I 4 8 I I i 4 8 gg I 1, InUIP4LNT kEPLACEhrHT e'lTN HUALIFIED EQUIPMENTa-*=-==============4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 1 8 8 8 8 g3 8 2 FoulPnrnT rongrtCAfinn---.*......-...... ...-.... ...... ---.....I g 4 g i 8 3 g i i I l i t i 8 Ln
). Fou!Po'F*T PEher ATION A90VE TMl: 6UU LpCFfCE LEVFL=...----....---.=1 i l I I I l l I I i ! 'i 1 -4 j,
8 8 4 1 A. RELOCATE OP 3:4l08.0 EQUIFhENT FPDM PADIATION SDupfM*-*=-*-========8 8 8 8 8 8 I I l l 8 4 8 8 8 1 8 S. VFalFr GUALIFICATION hY AppiflDi.AL if3flHG/ ANALYSIS----**==--====l 8 I I i i i ! ! I I i 1 8 8 8 gn
, ! 6 A ou t r nE a i sFl.uC A flon TO A P l oe ENV i b0s NFmT*===.--- .======--==---I 4 8 I I l 4 1 5 I 4 I l l l 1 an
. I T, 04ALIFIFATinl8 TEiffaC of EOUIPMENT 3% FNOGFF$$-=********=*-**=-e-l { l $ 3 1 4 ( l i 8 8 8 3 I i I ! 8. OTHFR l-..REE SPECIFIC 8:0UIPpFm7 ITFh IF CHFCrip .)--==*========l 84 i N l3 4 iR R R R I I A 4N I E 1 4 3 8 l l l l 4 I I ! ! ! I l 8 8 I I i 8 8 8 I LCliEbuff FHM rnnPiff!HN or CDRHt Cfl% E ArTIP9(5) HAS f>FFM,PrpVirEF-==8 8 & I I & 8 8 8 i i i 4 8 l 8 seassesessassessesenessaamssoassesssssasosasesmassssasesosasemassommessenesanessesassessassesessesseessesseessassasessomssessesessee f
'I
- e
'l l .
I t .
. g.
* . *t t ., - , . ,
s. a,.- . . . . + .. . ., .s . .. . a .. w. .: . ..i.. . . ~ - . . . . -w . .. . .. . .. . . .e 1 t-i Table 4-4 (Cont. ) J ci 9 e vru!PrEnt FLVlun e tai. anu.u lc4ione sun w r r.o6-4 .................................................. pgg .. . e=.. ?, >[n [/ ............................................................. l Fkr Foutrrr4r 1 I a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 F m............................. S H % e t p r. : 3 [5 l#1Sippfinisth19
.......................................................................................300G3061104244618444806Sle6640hfl##DibP*l0V08 to .............. .............................
gjU l llRC BruugpEFFmTS lirGIGNATIONs I . DEFICllmCT) , I l i I i & 8 8 I I I g 3 g g ,i i ...........-.... ---...--....-..-..............s. I i 8 I l l 8 g i i ,8 3 i
,, 3 3 sg a@ l 8. DOCUMENTED I:VIDENCE OF uuAbtrirATIPH ADt004TF===.-==-------==--==8 1 1xI3 47 13 818 8aiX 1y i IaiI 44 1xl l 2. AptuuATC SIHIL4WITY PFTaLEN FOUIPntr7 4ho 8 3 g i I 3 3 8 3 3 3 8 1 g g g
{ br & Th.s? sprClerg F5fARLISHrp - =*.........-...-...====..-===========4 1 33 8
- 3. AGING DFGp4DATION EVAL.u4TED ADrupATELV======-========--**---=====4 3 83 l I
l i 8 8 4 431 I I 4 l 8 8 3 8 I i 8 l 8 3 3 8 3 8 l g) 3 j 4 i n 1 4. CHALIFIFP LjfC OR alPLACRpFMT sCHFfuLE a g i i g 3 g g g g i g g g g , 9; i 3 i F3T88Lisurn 83r aroul6FD3......------..----------- .------......-l X l 3 8 4 4 8 3A I 4 ,1 1 g i 8 3 I q l S. Pn0GaAr. EsfanLISHFD To IDEhflFV 4G10G Ol'GRADAT]Ch=.------=======*8 I I i i i ! 4 II i ! I l I l j'i ll 8 4 4 6. CFITENIA REGAHptrG AGING $1rpi.ATIOb SAT 18FIFD IIF proulprp)======B 3 I I 8 4 i L. l '8 I I I I I i 4 T. CRITtala arG4pp3mc TEMPFnATnaE/ Fats &UPE raresuaEs I i l i 4 1 I I i ! l 3 8 5 3 8 8 A. .r TEnPlaATuRE 4DLnUATE==-***===============***==*--=1 3 4 l 8 i I l 8 4 I I $ $ I 1
. I u. = .EAKEnn reissuwE AprouA1E- ----------------*-----------*--I 4 8 8 4 4 i i i 8 4 4 I i 4. I e 1 C. = nueATBop Acrou4Tr..........--...-. .------...---- ....-l 8 .I 8 3 8 4 *g i I i I & 8 I I
~' 8 P. = PLOUIRFD PpHFILL EhWFLnrFu ADEGUATELY---=====******====4 8 8 4 1 I I I l i 4 I I I I I I r. = 81E4M Car 05UAE IIF htculpsp) ADEGUATF-======**=====-==-1 1 I I & I I i l l l 1 8 8 I 4 I* e. CalTERIA arcanosac spaAT 5ATisrlFD-=.----===--- -======= --======8 I I I I
. I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 4 8 8 9. CKlit.lA prGAahinG suegr6GirCL 3ATI5FIFA-------*----------*======8 8 4 I I ! ! ( l l I l l l 8 8
' i 10 CplTFRIA StGalp!4G MADIATION 5ATI5FIFb------**------***----**====8 4 3 4 8 8 8 1 4 8 8E i a i I 4 3
i! 35 I II. CRITLplA P EG A R D 1 hG T E S T a t opF t'CF S A T I SF I E D--*--------------=====- 1 I I I I I i I L L i 8 I I I I 3 ! 82. CRITEnl4 prGaaninG TE6T F41LUEE5 468 SEVERE ANurAB.lF8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 i ! p,
, ya l lir Ant) 34TI5FIED=-----*==.- ------------------------------*! I I l 1 1 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 II. CRITFe34 pEGApothG FuhCTioMAL TESTIllG SATISFIt'Da==============*--I $ 8 8 4 4 4 8 & 4 8 l l 8 8 8 L I4 CulTEast p rG A RDING I NSTR UHFilf ACCuR ACT & AT 4 5FIF Da========**---==-l l l l l l 4 I i 1 4 3 $ 8 8 8 8 85. Tr&T PuRATlph MARGIN 11 MOUh e (UuCTluN TIME) 5AT!sFIFP-===-=====8 4 l l 3 1 1 8 3 l 1 I I I I 3 l 4 16 CpIFERIA DEGAppl4G MAHG3b3 &&TI5FIED (HURLG=0589 CAT. 4)===****=$ 4 8 L i ! ! I L l l 4 8 8 8 l m e e a m e s a . s . . s . . s s m a s . a . . . . e s . n e . . . . . . . . . . . . e . m . m . s e . e s s a . s . . s . e s s . s a . . e s . e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I bHf 04ALIFirATIUM CATEGDAT (DESIGNATIONI E = CATEGORY) - 1 3 1 'I I I I I 8 I I l I & I I
- g ....... -. ......-........ ........-........-.-.--.... g g I g g I g i g i g 3 g I g 3 ,
; 8 8.A LOUIPMBNT GUALlflLDe*=**-*====-******=**==*=====*-====-*--===$ l l l l 8 3 I I I I i ! ! l 1 1 3.6 s.nunperkT 00ALIFIC#TinN PENDIhc apDIFICATIDN-====--=======--=4 4 I I I I I l i I I I I I i I e ! II.A E003rMFhT GUALIFICATION NOT F3fA8LISHED============****=-*-*=8 I I& 4I i 4 II l 3 43 8 3 45 83 i R l t I ) ! X l 3 8
. 8 II.a I OU I P DIFt:T Hof QuALIrgtl ........--...--................=.....I I I l 3 4 4 8 8 g i I i 1 1 3 1 1 II.C FQHlrnrh7 8ATISFIES ALL Ntpulpfers.TS l'ICFPT - l l 1 4 4 4 8 84 I I I i 1 8 8 8 I OHALIFIF.R LIFE OR ALPLACEPrhT 3CHEDuLE JusTIF3FD.-..=---.....I I I I I i 4gi I ! l 8 8 8 L I
'9 I !!I.A F041PNFb7 EAFDPT Fann OUALIf1CATIUM-==--+====*============**=1 1 1 i i ! 1 8 1 4 i I i l l l-1 Ill.B E4HIPar07 NOT IN THE srnPE lir Tbt aLVIEd...-.-..........--..=1 3 I I 3 4 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 g i IV ODCuaFMT4 TION Hut Mang AVAILApLF*...---..-... ............-.. I I I I ! ! l 4 8 8 8 3 3 I g td m.........a.s..s a.m....as...eas.a...s...m.m ass...e..am.........sses.a.s. esse..m.m.sa m.sa.. .s.es.a.a.. massas..sses..ma..s...s...e P3 e
t CORPECTIVE ACT3um SPFCirIFn g -........----............-. (LEs3GaAT10Ne I . ALTIDs SPiCIFIris) 1
.................--...--........... j I
l i i 8 I 8 I 4 g 4 3 4 g 3 I 3 g 8 8 I 3 i g g 8 i g i g [ L ,3
;j l 3. Fruirnent PEPLACENEb7 NITH HHAI.3Fatu A00lPPrNT=-============.-==-4 4 8 4 8 8 I 1 8 3 i ! l ! 4 1 ka 4 Mon!F3CATIHP***======...-**===================***-=====$ ) 8 8 ) l I I I I l l l l 8 i Ln i 2. EQUIP".Fht *
- 3. roulpergi SLE.DCATj04 APOVE THE SHrPLR4:FNCF l#Vil,=======.-========4 8 8 8 8 8 4 I I I I l l l I i I 4 htL"CATE 08 SHIELD Enutentbf IPou pAntAtluu souhCF= ----====--d*=4 4 I a i 8 i i I L I I i ! l l g.
I 5. Vl4IFV nUALgrICATInn my A lip l T 3 ni. A L T E311 HG / A M AI.T 51 A------==------I I I 8 8 8 8 1 1 I L i 1 8 1 i en
! ! 6. E0PIPNFht PEl.OfATIA4 TO A pli.D tNVILP4HENT================*====--! I I i 1 4 ) I I I { l 8 8 I $ GN 8 T. OuALIFICATIui TESTIDG ur t:QulrPFh7 IN FPDGhE53===========--======4 8 8 8 I & I I I l 1 i i ! 8 8
{ l* 6' I 0. 01HFR I.- SEe: SPt:CIl lC EnulPne >T ITe n IF CHECEFD .)-------***---r l 8 I a I aI Ia4 4 1 3 ia1& I ai ai
- t 8 -8 I I i 8 8 i i I I 8 8 I 8 3 8 1i i ACHE e UI t anPs.rtlu.i er 005 F FCTIVF. ACTluNi&l HAS M6FN rhpVIhrr---I I I I I i
..........E FnN.................................................................. ..........4.......................8...8 ................
$ $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 j ,
e - i-
- g. '8 I
- t
. ! ~
n
.t'
. .
- i
- o ., .s .
. w "
. ,. m . a . ;..,e : . , ; a, .. A am . 4 i. . . .
. Table 4-4 (Conte )
i
+
i . c-- ts' HIPhl NT 1:HvikotPreTAI. nunt.I65CATIane su n All Fs Pr ggg .........es..s ......................e............ j
* *M . mas s e ss e s.a ss e s s e s se s....s e...... ..s a... .es e....a m e ss e nes s.
I tar ruulrer.4T ITre ruppr65 8 U assesse.ee. sasassessee.nessemena.sesassesses.ames.nemass.see 3
!E 804884928n9314943095509640911e9s899981005 to ....................................................s....................................................................e.........8 8 Mar arpuluTHIHTs ll'EstGNAT30Hi a e PEFICIFNCII j; 8, I ! ! I 1 1 I I" 1 I I
; fjf ==..--...=....--.== .===.....
,u
. I g i g I g i g g 1 1 7g 8 .-=.=....=.....=
t l 1. ObCunigiftp EvinrHCE of bHAbtrlCATION ADEQUATE====================4 3 II &I ( l i 1 IaiR 1 4 8 a l ! I I i 3 I ( l 3 $ 2. ADIOUATE sintLaplTV mETwfEN ruplPnFDT ANP 4 8 1 8 l l 1
' i Ttst SP6:C3rtu F4TADLl6Hr0========**=--===========================4 8 8 8 4I l 2 8 8 8 tr l I I I I i I ( l
- l. AGING PEGaADATION EVALHATED AbrQUATIt.V======-====================l 1 1
() n { 5 4 QUAbtrIED LIFE na plPLACE.iEPT g;p0Dul.E . p. 6 I sl l l 8 I i a l l I I rsfaul.Isnro !!r eE0ulproi ---=...===---==--. --=-----------===.--I I I I I I i i i 8 i I R I I S. PkDCPA4 lSTABLISHED 70 IDtpflFT AGipG DECHADAT10h====---===---===l 8 i i I I I I' 4 1 3 1 8 l I I I l I I 1 6. Ca?TEult prGAnnING AGlhG simul.ATIGN SATI5FirD lit pr0UIRAp)..====l l 4 8 8 I l T. CPITEpin urGaspING TEMPEBATupr/rpr56UpE FXFDauaEl l I & I I i 1 I I I I I l I l 8
- 4. - PEAR TEMPENATupr ADt.00A?E======**=====**======--=======8 8 8 8 4 4 4 1 t i l I i l i R. - PRAE rpt:SSURE ADEDHA1E=================================8 -1 & I l 8 )
I c.
- DURATION APE 4UATE==============*-*---*==========-======l 1 I i 1 1 I I -l i I "1 I i ! l i I I A. = DEQUlptp Fh0 FILE EPWALOFFD ADfGUATFI.Va**=====e=========8 8 8 4 1 8 I I I r. = StrA4 FIP05uPE (lr kfQulPEp) ADED61 ATE ==================l 1 i i l l 3 8 8 8 l i ! l
;g i 8. CPITERIA PFGahntuG &Ppar 3ATISFilp*=======*=====**===============8 (
I 8 I 8 4 4 4 l 8 J I 9. CelTEpl4 PFGASDING 800mEPGEnCE $4TI&rtED-===*====**==============8 4 8 i 1 8 1 I I I i 1 # I 80. CRiiERIA SEGARolNG DADi& TION SATISFIED--===>=========-*=======-==8 & 8 8 1 1 ? . 4 45. CpITE83A DFGARolFG TEST SroufMCE SAT!5 FLED *===-*=================4 i ! ! 4 1 8 4 f 8 1 1 1 l i 12. CplTERIA PIGAA0!NG TEST FallukES DR SF.VFpt AkoMALIE3 3 4 8 I i 1 4 l 1 l l 8 pa I I i I i La ! . lir ANVI sATISFIEu------. .==.-- .-===--*======.--===========8 4 I & I i 3 I i ! ! I i ! I I 8 13, CRITERIA prGARDlHG FUNCTIONAL tt37thG SAT!5FIED-=================8 8 8
?
5ATisrlFD============6-==-l 8 I I i ! l & I 1 1 3 I 14. CPITARla DFGARD l I 8 IS. TIST puma 1304 . APGin igg th&TSHkENT ACCutACY il puun e FHkCTID# TIME) 5ATISFilD========--I i 1. 1 I & I a 1 8 i 16. CalffalA pfGApn!LG MAkGIN3 3AT35FIED SHUREG*0588. CAT. l)========l I *l- 4 I L i i l l , 3 8 e m e s. ...e.se n es s m en. ea sse s semes e......e s s nes s meessess e.....e mes....es.....
........... man.eassem en.sm a s ses.ame se ss '
assenessessen e s
! NkC GUALIFICATIUM CATFGopy (DE88CNAT10Na I e CATFGDRVI I l 4 I 1 8 8 8 8 ! 1 1 I ==.-===*-~~=--=======-===- ---=========----=---=------ 1 I I i i 4 i ! l i 1 1 l I I I gal I inutrPrw? OuaLIrltp=-.....=...==-=.---.-=...--.....=--.=...--I 8 1 1 1 4 1.4 l I l I l I I.s E0ulPulHT 90ALIFICATick PINDihG *pplFICAfl0P-=============== I I l 8 4 I 4 E4ulPhfw? nuaLir3 CAT!nm Sc7 F4TaphisHED--====== .===--.....==l 3 Ia13 I ta3sI 13 14 4 I 1
, 8 18.4 I i i II.6 Eontrht47 NOT 00AI.lFIEp-===.===---==*-===--====-------- ..--=1 1 ( l & I I 1 1 1 gnu!PMElst SAftKFIFS ALL pt0UIDFFEHTS EXCEPT I 1 1 8 I i 1 1 I i I i I II.C l i I i I OHALIrlEP LIFE on hfPLACrPFhT 6CHEDul.E JUSTIFIED ==-==========8 8 I l ! I I I \*
I i lit.A E9ulPutJT EntnPT Fann Gunt.IFirAT10N===============e -======.el 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 i 8 8 l 138.5 EculP*rkT up? lu THC 8COPL'OF THE DEV!EW================. ===8 i .I I i 1 'l ! ! ! 2 J ,4 I I I3 I i 1X q l 1- g4 DhCUPENIAfton WOT MADE AVA3LAeLE=*===***=====-===---=========8 1 8
, I IV emesse.. sessessessesse.ne............es...asseseasseems. aesessasseesness.sessesse ..essessessass.genesessnessnessamesm-ess.semas.s ps 3
! CLabrCTIVE ACTsup ArrCir!Ep (IEPIGNATIOP3 3a ACTlDN SPECIFil:PI I I I i -l l 8 8 8 8 8 8 C)
.........==........==.....=........ -l I g 9 1 8 8 I I I I I 4 =...=....... -.........=... i i I I 1. Euu ! Pat:nf PEPL ACEwEnf M I Til OH A bi ri t h E0h l PMENT=============..==== 8 8 1 1 I I I 1 'l f$
g i i I g i ! (3 I 2. FoulPrE1T roptrtCallos........--==......==.........-==..=.==.--.-l
~
8 l 8 8 I l 8 l l 1 8 l =J
- 3. EP.ul P*Eh? D rLOC AT I D'i A nuv E THE 5 ldh 5 pGrhCE LEVEL ===......======== l 8 L 1 i
l 8
- 4. prLnCATE 09 5HIELD EQUIPntb7 FPen RADIATION sov&Cr. ===.==.......! ! ! l 1 1 i i g g i 8 i S. VEplFT quAbtrtrATION pf ADDITinpal. 1ESTibC/ANALT385===*=========-8 8 I i 8 i I & I 1 i i l I i 8' I g i 4 6. {culprrh7 erLOCAfloh t o A P 10p S W V I R na nLN1........=..= ....==.... ! , ) g I 8 l
4 T. QUALiflCAtlun TESTIPC nr LQUlrnthf ik PpnCnrSS====,========...====8 8 8 I I I I I I l 8 ste sPrCtr tC 4:au tretni Is En IF CnECs t o I-====--------I ial A I & I L 8a8A B l 8
. I a. Oiurn (
8 I I ~ I I I l ! l 8*1 I & 8 &CHEput.r App Coat Ls: Tion ur Cupkt.CTIVr ACTinN!st PAS be rp Prhttprb..=4 3 I I 6 3 4 3 1 8 8 8
. eneses.sessassessammeenseen.smuseaes.een.nessessemase.mana.eas.sa.s.ssssesseneseemasse. massmessasemas.ne. assesses ==.easses. es. ness 9
I i *
.D
.?
' - TER-C5257-466 a
, 4.3 METHODOLOGY USED BY THE LICENSEE
'l a '
.l This section includes observations concerning the Licensee's 5
+3 qualification methodology presented in the respo,nse (14} to the NRC SER.
.u 4.3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment List 7-i.
Section 3.1 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern:
/l .
" Display instrumentation which provides information for the reactor c .? .
1 operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not i specifically identified by the Licensee. A complete list of all
.s display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HEL3 emergency procedures must be provided. Equipmeat qualification information in the form of sucmary sheets should be provided for all components of a
the display instrumentation exposed to harsh environments. Ins tru-mentation which is not considered 'to be safety related but which is mentioned in the emergency procedure should appear on the list. For
~; .' these instruments, (1) justification should be provided for not
- considering the instrument safety related and (2) assurance should be provided that its . subsequent failure will not. mislead the operator or
- adversely affect the mitigation.of the consequences of the accident. ;_
The environmental qualification of post-acc'_ dent sampling and_ _..
- mi
- [<^*
monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely related to- _ :s.: the review of the TMI Lessons-Learned modifications;and will be _ performed in conjunction with that review. The Licensee identified 501 items of equipment which were assessed by the staff."
- - In response to this concern, the Licensee stated [14):
- "A. Systems List 7;
Based on the NMPC submittal (November 3,1980 assessment) .the staff
- concluded that the infor=ation on safety-related systems was
' insufficient to verify that systems considered were all the systems required to achieve or support the following functions:
.L i 1) emergency reactor shutdown l 2) containment isolation
[ :) 3) reactor core cooling
l 4) containment heat removal ,
- 5) core residual heat removal -
K y ,- 6) prevention of significant release. radioactive material to the r i. environment . i The list of NMP-1 systems presented in the November 3,1980 submittal
- included all sy:tems, both inside and outside potentially harsh areas, ,
^*
r i i
- 4-14 I nklia Resear Ao%,m rr ch n%
Center
'.i I
~_~-~__- J
..i
-i.
t TER-C5257 -466
-l f* nece;sary to provide the six functicus listed above. The following syseems list includes the safety function provided by each system.
J o Common Electrical Equipment (CEE): includes electrical components common to all systems, e.g., cable, connectors, etc., and therefore
- supports all six functions.
o Reactor Isolation (RI): provides function 6 4 I o Automatic Depressurization System (ADS): provides functions 3 and.5 -
- o Containment Isolation -Drywell (CID): provides functions 2 cnd 6
! o Containment Isolation - Torus (CTI): provideshunctions2and6 i o Core Spray (CS): provides functions 3 and 5 t
o Reactor Vessel Instrumentation (RVI): initiates functions 1, 2, 3, l
; 4, and 6 initiates functions 1, 4, and 6 o Additional Instrumentation (AI):
~
o Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling (RBCLC): supports functions 3
- and 4 a
...m o Control Rod Drive'(CRD): provides function 1 o MG Sets 162 and 172: support all 6 functions
-1
- o Power Distri'bution (PD): supports all 6 functions o Containment Spray (CoS): provides functions 4 and 5 It should be noted that the systems list originally provided in the 4 -
November 3,1980 submittal has been resised.
- The following six systems have been deleted for th'e reasons pro'vided.
- s 4
'j o HPCI System *
'. 5 Reason - The HPCI system is not powered from emergency power supplies and is not taken credit for in safety analyses. Its
~ -{ safety-related function is duplicated by cora spray in conjunction with ADS.
. ~ ~
o Emergency Condenser System Reason - The main purpose of the emergency condenser system is to -
. 3 assure long term cooling during isolation events by maintaining coolant inventory. Credit is not taken for this system in '
; LOCA/EELB safety analyses.
4 - 15 4 - 0900 FrankLn Research Center Ac e orn.r. m A ^* e *I . r . . s -. .
- _ , _ - Q - _ , , -
l _ . - . . .. .. . . _ . _ _ . . . . _ _ _ . ~ TER-C5257-466 1 o CAD and H 022 Monitoring Systems Reason - The purpose of the inerting systems is to provide an inert nitrogen atmosphere in the drywell and torus in case the cora spray system does nor, function properly following a LOCA; i.e., these
' ' systems only serve as a backup to the core spray system. Possible use of the H 022 onitoring system for radiation sampling of drywell air falls under the scope of R.G.1.97, and the NRC has indicated that those items will be evaluated separately from the IEB 79-013 response. .
o Reactor Building Emergency. Ventilation System
.?
~
Reason - According to the NMP-1 FSAR, the, reactor building emergency ventilation system is not a required engineered s afe guard . A postulated 100% core meltdown without reactor building emergency ventilatica will approach 10 CFR 10.0 limits only _. if the reactor building integrity is such that it leaks 1800% of its volume per day at -0.25 inches of water differential pressure. The reactor building is designed for maximum leakage of 100% of building volume per day at a -0.25 inches of water differential pressure. o MG Sets 162-172 . _ .
. Reason - The MG system has been removad from the 79-01B scope -
because it has been determined that its components are not
- subjected to harsh environments. Our definition of mild environment is discussed in Section 3.2. ,
~$ Thus, with the exception of thc MG sets,.the systems list provided beforehand cepresents the 79-01B systems list for NMP-1.
B. Display Instrumentation u " The staff requested that NMPC provide a complete list of display instrumentation mentioned in LOCA and HELB emergency p'rocedures. Component evaluation worksheets we.e requested for all components'of display instrumentation exposed to harsh environments with the
- . exception of non-safety related equipment and post-accident sampling,
. _ monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment. Justification for
- '; considering an instrument as non-safety related and assurance that its N subsequent failure will not mislead the operator or adversely affect accident mitigation are required. Post-accident sampling and monitoring equipment will be. reviewed in 'c'onjunction with TMI Lessons-Learned modifications. -
4-16 b"Shs Frar.k!in Research Center . A Dewee.on of The Fw Immamse
j- , TER-C5257-466 - {. Table 3-3 provides a listing of display instruments mentioned in the . i , NMP-1 special operating procedures for LOCA and HELB. The table j includes a column listing the associated instrument components
- j. currently within the 79-OlB workscope, i.e., in harsh environments.
.1 Component evaluation worksheets are provided for these items in Appendix A.
I j For the remaining display instruments, NMPC will defer environmental j qualification until these procedures have been revised using emergency procedure guidelines which are entrently being reviewed by the staff. e This deferment Es considered justified in that the components being
+
' qualified now are considered sufficient to ensure, safe handling of thee plant by the operator. -
i;n __
,i C. Safety-Related Electrical C'uponentso A ccmponent-by-component review has been performed by NKPC to more closely define component safety-related functions and revise the master parts list presented in the previous (November 2,1980 assessment) report. 3 Revision of the master parts list of the safety related electrical . components essential to LOCA/HELB mitigation is based on the following considerations: "" ' ~" ~
o Analysis' of ; components safety-related functions and deletion of' - those components whose operations are not essential to LOCA/HELB mitigation ' - o T.e . of accident environments and deletion of those components whn are located in the mild environments. A current listing of safety-related electrical components considered by NMPC to be necessary to mitigate the consequences of a LOCA/HELB is provided in Table 3-1. Display instruments located in the harsh environments are noted in Table 3-3 and included in Table 3-1. A listing of the components previously considered in the scope of IEB
~
79-01B but now deleted based on the above reasons is provided in Table 3-2, and a component-by-component justification is provided in Appendix B." j A detailed evaluation of the Licensee's response is presented in Appendix C. 6 O e 9 0 4-17 nidin Research Center - I A Om of The Franda insmae e 6 e ew_ e ese *=ee- ==e e =e. ee- m =** ee - e= - e , -e,
'j TE R-C5257-666 !
; 4.3.2 Containment Spray System i .
,. Section 3.2 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern:
. 1
" Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21 requires that the DOR guidelines and the 'For Comment' NUREG-0588 are to be used as the
- criteria for establishing the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment environmental qualification program. These J' documents provide the option of establishing a bounding pressure and temperature condition based on pisat-specific analysis identified in *
. the Licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or based on generic
, profiles using the methods identified in these documents.
A
', On this basis, the staff has assumed, unless otherwise noted, lhat the
-' analysis for developing the environmental envelopes for Nige Mile point Unit 1, relative to the temperature, pressure, and the containment spray caustics, has been performed in accordance' with the
. requirements stated above. The staff has reviewed the qualification documentation to ensure that the qualification specifications envelope the conditions established by the Licensee. During this review, the staff assumed that 'for plants designed and equipped with an automatic-containment spray system which. satisfies the single-failure criterion, the main-steam-line-break (MSLB) 'environmentaliconditions : are r.t m.. . dar?" " -
enveloped by the large-break-LOCA environmental ' conditions. The staff - . - assumed, and requires the Licensee-to verityi that the containment spray system is not subjected to a disabling single-component failure and therefore satisfies the requirements of Section 4.2.1 of the DOR guidelines." In response to this' concern, the Licensee stated (14]:
'I "3 2 Service Conditions O
;j In the previous NMPC submittal (November 3, 1980 assessments) a detailed procedure for developing the environmental envelopes,
~
relative to the temperature, pressure, and the containpent. spray, in accordance with the guidelines delineated in the IEB 79-01B and the - j NUREC-0588 'For Comment,' was presented. For the purpose of this report, aharshenvironmensisintendedto repre sent those service conditions which result from a LOCA or HELB and are outside the equipment's specified operating band. w?,
."(* Mild environment qualification guidelines have not yet been issued.
At the NRC staff meeting on July 7-10, 1981, one definition presented by the NRC staff indicated that the equipment would be considered in -
,1 the mild environment category as'long as the environmental conditions resulting from a LOCA/HELB do not exceed: (1) the range originally -
specified for the equipment, o- (2) the design range specified by the manufacturer of the equipment. For the purpose of this report, this , A Dhan=ori ei The r insin insmyne
^ ~ ' - ~
. n f:
. ml
'l. 1 TE R-C5257-466 3
definition has been applied to exempt the equipment now considered -
.J located in the mild envirbnments from the current scope of IEB 79-013.
In conjunction with the review of environmental conditions resulting 1., from line breaks inside containment, the staff requested NMPC verify
'} that the NMP-1 containment spray system is not subject to a disabling ,
single-component failure. The NMP-1 FSAR states the containment spray 8, system consists of two independent and separate full capacity systems 3
. supplied by station reserve powers or from either of the two_ emergency diesel generators. One system will start automatically, the other is *
. started by the operator in the control room.
':)
a y Li: siting service conditions haie tfeen determined for_;mstulated
.j accident conditions including LOCM HELB inside contain=ent, and HELB j outside containment. These sepvice conditions include pressure,
,' temperature, humidity, and radiation dose."
It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to the NRC concern. 4.3.3 Environmental Service Conditions ._ __ 413 3'.1 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment
- Section 3.3 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern:
"The Licensee has provided the results of accident analyses as follows:
Max Temp (*F) Max Press (psig) Humidity (%)
- s 1 LOCA 340 35 100 l
d The staff has concluded that the minimum temperature profile for
! equipment qualification purposes should include a margin to account
.sj
^
for analytical uncertainties in the calculated temerature profiles for postulated' accidents. A margin of 20*F above steam saturated temperature is considered to be appropriate for either a postulated
}, LOCA or MSLB, whichever is controlling 'as to potential adverse e environmental effects on equipment.
i j Limiting pressure / temperature versus time profiles developed by the 1 Licensee to envelope steam-line-break conditions inside containment 2 are different from the pressure and temperature profiles in the FSAR. ._ Because of this, the Licensee should provide the related analysis for
.- staff review."
g Di t
~- .
l 4 4 -19
. $FrankRn Research Center .
*1 3
A. 1 A. a.
TE R-C5257-466 The Licensee responded to the NRC concern as follows [14]: '
"The limiting temperature / pressure versus time profiles submitted were different from the profiles in the FSAR. Consequently, the' staff requested that the related analysis be provided.
In lieu of providing the analysis, NHPC has revised the ILniting containment temperature / pressure profiles to tl:ose provided in the FSAR for recirculation line break, with 20*F added as margin to
,' account for the possibility of local superheat. The FSAR curves were .
. ,, previously provided in the November 3,1980 submittal, and are
;* su=ma.ized in Table 4-1 and shown in Figures 4-12A and 4-123 of this repo rt. _, ,
NMPC considers use of the FSAR curves plus 20*F appropriate for the following reasons: A) The -FSAR states that the actuation of containment sprays would eliminate the possibility of superheat temperature in the bulk of the drywell. B) The NRC Guidelines, Section 4.2, allows that the LOCA environment envelopes main steamline break environments in plants with ; . . . -u _ automatic containment spray systems 'not : subject to disabling;;;n t.;_ e d
~
single failures."r 2: 1. -2'm _- - A It appears that the Licensee has resolved the NRC concern. 4.3.3.2 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Outside Containment Section 3.4 of the NRC SER [13] stated:
. "The Licensee has provided the temperature, pressure, humidity, and PI applicable environment associated with an HELB outside containment.
The following areas outside containment have been addressed:
' C (1) Isolation valve cubicle 19 '
(2) Steam tunnel entrance
~
(3) Steam tunnel
$! (4) Condenser area
, d (5) Isolation valve cubicle
, (6) Turbine building uj (7) Emergency condenser valve cubicle
*- (8) Containment spray heat exchanger area
; (9) Emergency condenser area (10) Emergency condenser return. valve cubicle (11) Clean-up system cubicle *
(12) Instrument rooms east and west (13) Instrument room north g 8 4
.--.n.. .
- N
1
,l 1.,
I TER-C5257-466
}
1, The staff has verified that the parameters identified by the Licensee . for the MSLB are acc.eptable." i In response, the Licensee stated (14]: i "The staff reviewed the service conditions defined for HELB'r outside j containment and verified that the parameters identified are acceptable. These service conditions are sucmarized in Table 4-1 and
.: shcun irr. Figures 4-1 through 4-11 of this report." j
.i .
I t 4.3.3.3 Nuclear Radiation Dose (Insid's and Outside Containment) l 1
': Section- 3.8 of the; NRC SER-(13] stated: l 9 "'Ihe Licensee has provided values for the radiation levels postulated to exist following a LOCA. The application and methodology employed
; to determine these values were presented to the Licausee as part of the NRC staff criteria contained in the DOR guidelines, in NUREG-0588, 4
and in the guidance provided in IEB-79-OlB, Supplement 2. Therefore, l for this review, the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted, the values provided have been determined in accordance with the
; prescribed criteria. The staff review determined that the values to
...' which equipment was qualified enveloped the requirements identified by the Licensee.
The value required by the Licensee inside containment is an integrated
~ '
dose of 5 x 107 rads. This value envelopes the DOR guideline- -
; requirements and is therefore acceptable..
{ A required value outside containment of 4.1 x 106 rads has been used i by the Licensee to specify limiting radiation levels within the
.~~j :l reactor injection system in the reactor building. This value appears to consider the radiation levels influenced by the source term
'r '
methodology associated with post-LOCA recirculation fluid lines and is therefore acceptable." i The Licensee stated (14): . 1
.] "The staff evaluation stated that the integrated radiation dose values for inside and outside containment are acceptable. These values were
- M) determined in accordance with prbscribed criteria in the DOR
. Guidelines and Supplement No. 2 to I.E. Bolletin 79-01B. Outside j containment integrated radiation dose values include contributions
'f from post-LOCA recirculating fluid lines."
1 -
.t
! .~i - j n .
- 3 .
i e 4-21 O udJ AFranidin o, Research Cer.ter a .m. re.ca,
~
4
~
+t
-- - .- a . . . - - .. -
___m________._ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
f
- TER-C5 257-466 4.3.4 Submergence Section 3.5 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern:
"The Licensee has stated that submergence in the drywell is not a concern because of the low resistance flowpath to the torus and the large torus-free volume. It is not evident that the licensee considered the effects of all steamline breaks, both inside and outside containment (for example, a feedvater line break outside containment), and their relation to the submergence of Class IE .
equipment. The li'censee should address this concern." In response to this concern, the Licensee stated (14):
"The staff evaluation of the submergence service condition indicated that it was not evident that NMPC had considered the effects of all steamline breaks, both inside and outside containment.
The previous NMPC conclusion that accidental submergence of require 4 Class IE equipment in containment is not a concern was based on consideration of all line breaks in containment. Consideration of submergence of equipment.outside containment was .not , a requirement of I.F. Bulletin 79-OlB. However, submergence outside. . ~-" containment does not appear to be a concern due to the limited amoune of fluid discharged from postulated HELB's outside containment before break isolation, and because of equipment sepa.ation. For example, the lowest elevation in the NMP-1 reactor building is divided into four separate compartments; the safety related equipment at,this elevation is redundant and located ,in separate compartments. NMPC. will investigate the submergence service condition further and submit any new information as it becomes available." It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to the NRC concern. e i
~
A.3.5 chemical Spray Section 3.6 of the NRC EER (13] identified the following concern:
* "The Licensee has stated that the plant's primary containment does not i
. have a chemical spray system. If, however, the plant design has a demineralized water spray, its effects should be examined and the Licensee should address this concern." _
O e A De of The Frennan inscame
! TER-C5257-466
+
1 In response to this concern, the Licensee stated [14]:
"The staff requested NMPC to address the effects of demineralized l water spray in its equipment goalification efforts.
l 3 The NMP-1 containment spray system is the only source of spray. This j spray is demineralized water taken from the torus. The spray header i nozzles.are arranged to minimize the impact on equipment and the j nozzles produce fine' spray droplets less than 1000 microns in size. Various electrical components located inside containment were. tested-1 using- various mixtures .of ' chemical spray which, in fact, were a more l s1 severe simulation than the demineralized water spray _,_ For example, !
' ' j.
boric acid and boron were used in the chemical spray /LOCA tests for
~
Limitorque Valve Operators, Raychem cables, and GE cables.
; Furthermore, various electrical components are sealed in NEMA 4 watertight enclosures whicit open from the bottom only; for example,
' the Dresser 1525VX relief valve and solenoid are contained in such
! enclosures. h refore, spray could not affect operation of these components.
NMPC will consider the effects of demineralized water spray in its qualification of equipment located inside containment." It is concluded that 'the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to . 2
~ mc -
, the NRC concern. ' - - '
4.3.6 Aging and Qualified Life - Section 3.7 of the NRC SER [14] identified the following concern:
; "Section 7 of the DOR guidelines does not require a qualified life to
, be established for all safety-related electrical equipment. However,
] the following actions are required:
, ,1 (1) Make a detailed comparison of existing equipment and the l materials identified in Appendix C of the DOR guidelines. The first supplement to IEB-79-01B requires licensees to utilize the l table in Appendix C and identify any additional materials as the result of their effort. j (2) Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify potential age-related i degradations. .
, -1
-l (3) Establish component maintenance and replacement schedules which ,
include considerations of aging characteristics of the installed y components. J DN 4-23 3 M Franklin Research Center .
! Ao m wn.r % % -
2 . . . . . _ . _
}
TER-C5257-466 The Licensue identified a number of equipment items for which a specified qualified life was established (for example, 5 years, 15 years, or 40 years). In its assessment of these submittals, the staff did not review the adequacy of the methodology nor the basis used to arrive at these values; the staff has assumed that the established values are based on state-of-the-art technology and are
- acceptable.
For this review, however, the staf f requires that the Licensee submit supplemental information to verify and identify the degree of
- conformance to the above requirements. The response should include all the equip =ent identified as required to maintain functional
- operability in harsh environments. __.
The licensee indicated that this phase of the response is outstandi~ng and that the review is in progress. The staff will review the Licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss ~its evaluation in
- a supplemental report."
In response to this concern, the Licensee stated (14]:
"Section 7 of the DOR Cuidelines does not require that a qualified ,
life be established,for all safety-related electrical equipment. ; e' eg.. c. Hownver, as required by the NRC staff,*the' supplemental information to " ' verify and identify the degree of conformance to the following -.m , requirements has been submitted.
- 1. NRC Requirement - Make a detailed comparison of existing equipment and the materials identified in Appendix C of the DOR Cuidelines.
NMPC Action' - NMPC has engaged NUS Corporation in an extensive qualification assessment program to collect environmental , qualification data, and to determine the expected life of each safety-related electrical component. This qualification assessment program has been implemented in the following manner: A. Obtain Complet6 Equipment Description s The =aterial receipt forms, purchase requisition forms, master parts lists, and various other documents were reviewed to identify proper model number, serial number, and rating of each component. This information was used to obtain each component's materials data.
. B. Contact Vendors to Obtain Material's, Design, and Qualification -
Data , Each vendor was contacted to obtain the following information:- , nklin Research Center - A Dween d The Frarda lesenme
- ~, , ~- - - - .
i, i TER-CS 257-466 j o Bill of Material and Materials Designation Data - If the c4 bill of materials could not be provided, then a list of
']
age-sensitive (non-metallic) materials was requested. 1
.1.j o Manufacturer catalogs and manuals
' :4
.. o Environmental qualification Reports - If no qualification or materials data for the subject component could be provided , then complete qualification information
; (qualification data, materials / parts description, catalog,. .
and manuals) fir a replacement model which is qualified or-
.. qualifiable.vas requested.
.1 C. Perform a Study to Environ =entally Qualify Eq$ipment i]' .
Using the data obtained from the above tasks, an expected life - analysis based upon the following applicable criteria was performed for each component. o Operational Cycling Effects *4herever in-ser.vice operational cycling was identified, it was compared with the manufacturer's reccomended cycles and with the actual operatienal cycling tests that were performed. "~ il ~ - - o Time / Temperature Effects - The expected life was calculated. <- < based upon the time / temperature effects of the weakest --- material of the component using the Arrhenius Theory, as - follows:
~
a in(t) = K [1)
\T/
+A (1) u.; b
. i where, 4
- 1
.: In = Natural Logaritha i t = Expected Life (Hours) '
e Es = Activation Energy (eV) I Kb = Boltzmann's Constant (8.617 x 10-5 eyfog) l T = Service Temperature (OK)
. :.' A = Constant
.~
y,j If an accelerated aging simulation test was performed, the
. , , equivalent life at the service temperature was calculated
. using,the Arrheni,us; Theory as follows:
i? j - t =t exp I EaI Il 1) (2)
~
j_ 2 i ll , ,
'{
( b) ( 2 '1) _
.i '
3-
, - 4-25 t- UUIFranklin Research Center .
3 Aonavrm w
,4 i
.,.. . . ~ - . .
k TER-C5257-466 . where, c1 = Time at Aging Temperature (Hours) t 2 = Time at Service Temperature (Hours) E, = Activation Energy (eV) Kb = Boltzmann's Constant (eV/0K) T1 = Aging Temperature (OK) T2 = Service Te=perature (CK) I o Humidity Effects - A literature search to evaluate the - effects of relative humidity on the life of the subject component and its ability to perform its safety-related functiona ,was performed. ,, o Radiation Effects - Specified radiation dosage was compared with the assessed qualification test data and with the damage threshold level of each material in the subject cceponent. o Earsh Environment Effects - Using the vendor design data, test data, aging analysis and the Arrhenius Theory, an evaluation was made to determine if the subject component can be safely operated under these conditions. - D. Qualification Assessment Summary Report - -t c Based on the results of the above tasks, a report was prepared for each- component where such an analysis was conducted. The expected life determined from the analyris has been,noted on
. the component evaluatien worksheets.
This effort is continuing for these components noted as
' Assessment On-Going' in Table 3-1.
- 2. NRC Requirement - Establish an on-going program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify a,ge-related degradations.
- NMPC Action - NMPC/NUS has established an on-going program to rev,iew surveillance and maintenance records of the safety-related components. Primarily, this program has been exercised to more closely define the safety-related functions of the electrical-
' components essential to LOCA/HEL3 mitigation. In the future, tnis program will be expanded to identify age-related degradations.
- 3. NRC Requirement - Establish component maintenance and replacement schedules which include 'considera'tions of aging characteristics of
- the installed components.
e e A DW.an of The Frannia inactme
G I 5
+
! TER-CS 257-466 s - -
' NMPC Action - Wherever practical, the maintenance records and .,
'l replacement schedules will.be modified to include the
- considerations of aging characteristics for the safety-related
, ; i "
' components." l 4
- 't
; It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to
[ the NRC concern. 1 4 b
+kO- sw . 4 % ..
o am
.i
- i. .
l l 9 9
+ .
O e f , i . 9 4 *b e. A 4 -27
; 'JilllfFranklin
~~ Res,e_ arch Center
.. ,,a
* *em 4 rm e
1 i i
., u
. ~
+
TER-C5257-466
- ~
4.4 EQUIPPENT Ehv1RONPSNTAL QUALIFICATION EVALUATION The evaluation presented in this section of the report includes, for each equipment ites, completed equipment environmental qualification review checksheets (partially handwritten) which present. bath the technical
. information necessary to conduct the review and the results of the evaluation.
4 4-3- . 1 s. i .
- n
- t s
I 1 4
.- : s. -
"1 I
t 't
^ 4 -28 UN Frank!!n Research Center -
i r. a n- .a n. re w i :., -
.-i .- - -- _ , - .___.._ __ _ __ ,
I . e
*d~*=**, $ * *' - ' * '*' * * * ~ * * * ' " " ' ' ~ ' * ' ' ' * ** * '~ ' * * * * * * * * *
..t... . e *- L%< l e.~e . *~ ~
w c.:
. b "Tl #
sessasemassassassassessessesssssssssssees I 9 4tflPPf l.T S eawaruhprs:T AL qual.sp et aT 3ser* g g i EQUIP *LPT STF1 rerCasper? s ur F a 0 p 88He 'e t L F Pell e. T l 3 4
..........e..eeee...s......ae.ses.ss.....
4 % fuC 7 y :;r IYE a hD. r0Henhl**e7 r As.neraCTueF a Fentl. rurpre t.ser A f g eois () ensemesesessessessessenesessesemesessessessassoassessenessessmenessessessessessesseesseemseessemessessoasassessosssessesseesseessene ft i enTnngIEn vaLvr aCfpafum 1.s hl'innollE sns &gre l rLFa# esp STmfre rerirl s h, e s s e, tal 3 2 rnTs.F 8 Zrts WaLVE aCTUATup LIMIToratir seg slyes e, e rosT688drLT
@ ) "ntrut?.rl* VALTC ACTUATDS 3.IntTniGHE $ Ple l ( nD Ta j pef'6 7 4 s itinF I2rn V ALVE ACTH Atom Li f:If flP488K " 3 se.no g.a.? r e nse nu r Le g .se:
$ 8 81TCRI FEp v4LvC ACTuAine 3.t rif onour cre t a tt re* T Arran pr ai e sCesse e.ree op 6 pnTnWIZFD V8LVE ACTHATE.e Lin t TounUr . '.t.nPs 5es 2 4agir a imt escr.s'rf cru's.re 8rp a rs i.a f i ns t a s.w r 7 p uf f*stl Zrp V 4 LVI: ACTHATHP LIPITnP4HE 5*rf SIFT 1 060, 7, / cf o.t a t:4vreff 9 tiOf f plFFH V4LVt;' ACTDATON LIMITnmout &*iss 3336'M Ace, ; , r rec rs.r t rea:r.sy.pa r tr.s g.af tres v a s.w r 9 POTUNI?.rh V4LTE ACTUATIAR LIMlipRGUE s* Poco pa arina, ap i g.n g be-10 Sul.rnote vat.vr. Lai.eEpCr 2*prArr$ Pracing nu t s.eig en-ll &DLE'enID W ol.V F DECrn 28866 E rrAr TU'se f s.
12 301r*010 val.Vr prCCU 24166 DFACTn8 p H I I.P I N ll Fn' retnto was.vg asCn ag v a 944 G S t a p t af*1nn pu ll.pg est. ~
, 24 5HLF'80ln val.Vr CrrrpaL gl.LCTple IS2Svu rap ta n*ses o r 15 Snl4'afiln vat.uc psCn s lopea s pi; aroCTne mu s t,r g esn g 16 f.nLFunip val.y,; 3 3C:0 ePLR) pop?2F FriFaf.r.af f reh0 ras
- n IsrLa r gos w As.vt II &flLFlinID ValVr ASCO l 43p4 StpIF5 8 'eF ACs a cy rpggerp.56 P pl Tet '. W A LV 8-19 AOLFP0tD V48.VF ASCO 6'PLA ll8* 0P 6 3 r p r a Cisne pes t s.nt ra, p TulP pHit g 19 p os trr.u MT St ants 864C$lSes 86.p trs 6 l aC tris ap3 Leg 9c N 20 TalP lif8tf fin 5FitnUPT $1Gu 36SCISO stusts 6 t acts.a cutg.nses:
w 21 InserspuCFS, E/P F I S 64ER (0870008 $46 4154092 stacToo no g g.n g w. 22 T H L p tinctiu PLF PALt. Thlplit 8tarun TVrr est/m ptsCTn8 att i f.p t he 23 FRistukE TR4.19MITTFD Gr/44r SSI 8el. 8C Fne , nti f t.p 3 PC, a t.r y. ges*u* 24 ('pr$3uHr TPa.it4 81TEk CE/elaC $$8 49326llPol plaCrne po g g,n t ht*, FLe t, ger*pe . 25 Ppfssupt ThenartTTEE CE/*Ac SSR Jel94Al6633 aractn= pp. sr g ec, re.s v. p a g
- e."
26 PRE?5r*r Tuathtli kp Gr/ Mar 541 84444Alll15 pr#Cloe at!!Lhine, Fl.s w. Pal *se* 27 PRES %UME Tita'e% elTTr4 p ris rilou sti 18S8 ht.4CTop sits 31.P l PC , D LIV. Past*P* 26 TE* ,rP atune; 34 t vCet y te:e nt 3144 2 4 q, 37 4* 1 el**
- r 6 , 'LD u. 244*p*
29 s./P TuahSMITTrp hesrkntF47 ISSil> Tr227400lest ersftne autLoge r:, a F 3.p y , 7elee" 30 P/P TRAP 5FITgrP len&F*ndg7 I t $lI P pg a.!Tnk p il l L* I"f:, PLiv. 7tl*A* 31 l>/P TNAllantTTrp un3ElIOuti llSthP 1E72T uep tres F L a riesp pu f Lp 3 0%', Ts.f' b . p)1*r* 12 TE*Pr e a fl8mc Lt.t.*Fif r iferas r t Ca rs. p h a ueria 9"recr' CT raria r"Sr> ttris a tt rie ve s.wp
)) I'pFAshaar AJITrH firla rn g p & net)4 $rp353 1.94Dm23r po p CT um n.4 8 8.n 31:c , p g.s u , 7 p 3 *e.*
34 rpL3%H68r A fl1Cu paprHIp psS437 P6&CTee lite ll.P l ut, rg.p p . yel*4* 15 ISPFt. Tm4%2*ITTru unstnnugT InstPP *F8 Cine ou t Lo s ec, F Ls ?. p a g
- e.*
36 LrV [O$EnpuwT 13 Sit p PE Cine M498.bgric, rlJy, g 4 A * (.
- n Co*,rh T a tta,
.ns..s e er-E TTrN , r co ne Cr4in .. eu ..n i c . .m . , 4 *e."
}$ Lr f FI. TpagantTTrn r.F t rfe 48. f t.f rTp lC Sil uRJ45619P19 SI)cio.
C F'es m's I Lp l air , e s.r y , ? n l *t.
- f 39 f t.HW TH Afts*t ITTt:p posrt:nua? ISSane t t s cT.3, e.e g su g rg;, pgry, 333*c. o Ut 30- t 1.09 TPa*AHITire 6 hsre,nara f glggop a s. p p a **.se et actru p e g s.p g ree., r g.r y , 741*n*
el EI.fffPIC "Pfue CEarpal. ELFCTpjr SF44 Set?4%s relAlpp4 PE:trTHb pa g Ln g er, M 42 Fl.FFT e lf "'lTute . CFl.rH4L ELECTrfr Sad 2aelfr1 **ChlA5837 p s;a C1pe pu t Le g re., e g.p t, y)i*g* 43 ff.lCTafC apTue GFfJrpaL FlfCIWlr S F * ) 2 4 a ri lt.4 FE8CTuk PH I Lf l es ., p g.t v , I n f
- f*
- j 44 LL8.rTP IC aanfut 4.r*.r t 43. Fl.o rf p p e $8Alf.A%Cl6sa seC9BSS$14 Br7ri m mult.n3*ia:, pa.ev. 1st*t= c 45 rp5tTtop Sk t gree r a *rts 4 244868 e# 8C1.18 Mi'l l.p I 9r. . F s.r t . l a1's *
- 46 PPS I T lH8s $ 6 Tete .6 a l.CH H)4cht . 54F4* 19'*8 6't.
41 l*pSITfnP S el1(*te ea s t-ra e e 3 3 4 4..v p os e,r.g eerg egeo g.re ss a 3 33.g e g g es ,eg a s ve 45 f f *r* I f l HH 3*f f Trit PIC880 f.W 8 Tre8 t il s t b e 4C7 **' hu l bs- s et., Ft.i t , 7 81's." o roslisen saturn re irie si.)r% = i . si n. 3... e e., e i n , s t e.*
'4a
+
* .e I
e e n
~ , ./ w. .
*. .e* ... .1. . .a ss. . . . . 4 . . u. .h . i . . . , .. ,4 .f .
t c: C3
? ......................................... > .,)
p [/ 4 Fusel Pr*Fuf Fs.VistintidFHT AI. tall 49.3 51C ATIsH: 4 t Gaglit t e T 573.* rHFest Aus e T ( Pt.9:A 3 l 8 l
- I h i: h I 8.D PnIa 7 8
{ ..............................P.......... 1 to
-j *r) 6 ft M raC ITS P f2 r$1 t:0, CriM phi *' f r ? fas*HFACTuutR nnaiFl. s.arirte i s.r A f t p;s n
h 50 58 Pn5tTIOM sollrp PADIATin't DETFCrnt r.Atru
*kFp4L tit.CTpir sL 11.
894I92797 12*P24*Act t rr pswarv e rhre pe r os Tur a v a l.v t rie f usi.t le r eiu rs.plaar. cia;.s s e st a* 46
- s, el S2 f l.FrTRIGL cONilFCTDM n,G, H*MN Il.88 89%2h P38 36 A O:li 4 0-] t. J ruh18 3 %.Ir9 F
. {3 5) TERathA1. PLncu 1Fl.Fle AL ll.FCTp lC Eh5 Ahp 9H2% cop l a l Mt. .e f 54 Fl.FCTRICAL Cant.F. Ih& T S p#irta f S&IrHFM N C 598 tit rnP T p l* *.F 47
+
5% ll.FCTPICAR. SFALA:JT J*M Dui3F al. 31Fa* lupwl., FM v 24f.*4* Se LLtCTRIrpt CnourCTue bl8 A h0V GE i (nhT 6 81P'.*if 57 TF.unIMAL PLnC. r.p h ain t onP r. sis a. tu u rL, 6Bev, pan'a* Se i LFr Tp IC 48 CU4HFCfD8 liH R H DT nAECp reH T8 B &re4 F 59 , ILECTRIrAl. CAnLE SFLICE ArP PP6 Im& art. Af f D SI s a
- f p"*.rg , s g e ts , 3 4 g.
- g. o 60 1:5.FCTHItal c0HHFCT*R AMP kir4C Te*CHF TFPrikel. CDPTSI WF.%7 61 TFp rillat. Pl.nCN n1 CFD8aFI R I. & l 6 A
- T utel F l., 6 0.t W , 248'D*
' Pfarine muggpl*ac 62 Cll8Citif negap Fil cEPraAL Fl.FCTRlr AfD%
63 6 Lt*CTe lC 4 8. Ta't; Im/t LFCTito PRpDUCTS 4HO 8) = 579AP f u.s.sr h, t s.s u, 34p*a* 64 LLF/Ts l C&t. SEALANT GFPFN48. FLFCThtC Nn 277 j SIF%= I ne tri., l a t e , P a P *e
- 6S SLFrTRICal. rAPLC CrkFPal. ILFCTulf VHL*Ful; C API f; CO*Tal**C47 66 t~l.firTPir88, dt&Sul.ATING V38tpl8H CFNEN at. f.LE CipIC bn 1)ng pl.arp Ist&Hl. vamplau 81 tan TunprL, FI p ir. 24e*p* .
STFaP T u n s e' L , Fi.p y , pet.*n* I
% san 4)e9 67 ft.lCTPIC48. TAPE EFfFIIAL ELFCTRIC
& 68 Bl.rrTNICAL SEALANT kFplTC CFPFMT ATFAM 1 ssas. F l., FM W. 744*u*
I 69 St.DCTRICAl. TARE ,tFRITF 1/4 IHrte rpICTipu TAFF 51FAP T u's vrg., Fity, 14P'P* La8 10 %Ky TEllu lle AI. 313pLaf an#8 kFRITE &PLICll;C rOPP0nnp T arr STsame Tint %rs., Fl.6y , 740*a* O 18 FLF.rta lent. CAnLF, FukElf D Elt l TF uqAPAPLFX AS$FPHl.T S t. f All Ase Tegna ru 72 4:0 Top CorTetet. CEt4Tril CFfsFil4L Fl.ECTelC IC1700 pf4CTn6 %*e g g,n g ut., fl.#w. 3rl*#*
- 7) Pn10PIFFt YaLVE ACTHATOR LIMITpROUL SnD644 PFACTp. tu ll.l.l et., F l.r v , 7 4 8 *4 * .
14 HOTUNIZFn WA1.vE ACTHATUR LIPITnlIQUE Snpent " aE#C1Hu PH I 8.nt r4 6 0 e v , 2 9 t
- h*
15 sitiToplZt n val.ve; acil Atom LI H i f ns' ou t siennon omisel.f. CIEv 268*** 16 FnTnniten valve ACTIIAfb> LIMIT 4h0HC 5niaan e r s Cf rit. ma g s pit:s; fl.6:v , 18 6
- 4* 3 77 l'nTealTFn V4LvL ACTHATnP L I M ITsisif.lir s*l.a . eraCTok 418 4 3*l p' F l.I'v , 281***
18 Faf0H]1Fn val.Vf ACTUATOR LinlinanWC $'56 069 ulACTur Psall.DI NG D 183, P h l ** 19 50L8 '!nlD V &l.V F ASCO HTh187A29 ft.actna nHTLning rs ., 2sl'a' .
$@ I F V F t. Tp Am7,r tT FFie ND&FunHPT ll%2T426u DE4C1om MulLntph F t.r y , Igpen* .
$1 rmF85H8F Tn a:.Sr.lTT ER pp0Fmnu.T l ig)s:s g PFACTow null.ninc re rv, yel*9* I 42 Pa* 51pi t TitauntlTTER pnAFunuN1 33%) St.nlf S A mi sci a. mu ll.4*l
- r e:f F" . 1Fl*h*
31 g.rve l. Te arsalTirp PD5raqupt Il5tuas P aCins mia:LIgr*r. Fase, 713*o* 84 f t.ns: stalTrig p ri t su.a p 3.IlhlsTuansnf71FN Br F CT ate MP f l P IC'; F l.r v , 293*4* 95 PDF55HPF S 81CH STAvir n-plug $1. 6)ggrIA P # C1 ass Pu l bs. s re e s ,s v . 731*n* 04, Pahl AT ania isF.tFCTne LtkrntL ATL*1C sin 2 8 ppACTow nu ll.ni ws., rg.Fv, Tat *4* *4 PSRCTD8 9 H 8 6.b l 4f: 9.8.6.v . 2 ) T
- P
- M 67 LtdIT ShlTC" 'elCDU 84 8 7 C88 . F 90 THt liPnC:nipLp: uwFCA lassass373lypHil41834 l'FAPlad Du ll.HI *8r 4;f.9 y , 3al*O' 69 Tsarpnnrnurbr
- PVCp 0218710ernleg Curtage.rst e o LA 90 1 ihrfirpuPLE PTCH 0738756828395 kt$CTop 8pI I LI. I 'u: Fest, 7. t
- f.
- N 98 ELrcTptr uninP FM A46 0. ;4 upTnR/Puras PHPP )(1 %l PraC1pm mu gs ples; e s.Fv, ?l p *g*
El.NCTRICat runfirCfD84 rl.rv, 306*** 9,2, D.C. n C, 0o*9HIFM. ~ Clarago.ns.14 Clorten tr7s PrActn* lari n. ,,. au.l.beser
.n . ,s . l.C. , ul'.* $, .
.u:r.PiCai. r, n C,n. lf ,. ri c... C.., cl C.. 8423 r f,6( f en mu ta hll C va6(IUPb 888Wa184*4 &
94 6 f. EFT R IC 48. c APLF, CP A t l A4. PnCKPF570$ 6t $ A 6 8 p g 95 El.):r1 N I C a t, r A PI,r., I Pa rp oine 's? sencaisF37n3 Tsg. II, . N e a C a n.: engg. cgs.a. voygpais ag,yge nea e e
*i n . i ., PFsr19 .ssa t.nle s: vargoes ego.ns*Inas @ .
96 l't.t rTp t ra t. Cant.r. Cns:Ti.nb PUC. Ps.sTs.3 7 g g.e ( TP IC Al. rAal.r, THFpi prphrt.E els.str Tht*'Hernerer cant.r en a %e; I-4 8 C1.we aa'Is r.g s:s. t an g Poss o s.s tat lus s 94 epiipp :47 48 FFu s.thFrel tilClair (p 2
- T: 1?gaea s t arl.* as:g g.e e p: o g,. g , paten * '
99 CINCul? hu E A s r.N 8 CINEMAL ELECTpic NTF 2 0' ' DEACTua BulLDInu ELEV, 2el*e* 100 F038TlHe SWITrol NAPCO , SL)C58Tm ' STIAR Tuhaft., FLFy, 240'0* I e .
*)i I ,.
. N g ,
.4
,s. NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pags si![FrankDn Rewarch Center
! A N,sion om.< rr nun resuue FRC Assignrnent No.13 lc l_ mn ..d Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 19' H 1215) 4tMmX) FRC Task No. 14lo(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QU ALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMEN's ITEM NO. l 5
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 1 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE CLEAN UP SYSTEM CUBICLES, ELEV. 261'0" i LIMITORQUE MODEL SB-1 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSEEET NO. 1 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 43 ~ FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REACTOR CLEldiUP OUTLET ISOLATION VALVE (IV 33-04)
- LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCUJ(S): 3-18 [33] *
- ~ -:.. .. 2 ----.:. . , , _ ._.
.a
- DESIGNATION FOR CEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY:
(See Section 3 of this TSR for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S , .(R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: . Contents Checksheet Page No.
.-}..
Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
! Equipment Environmental Qualification Sum: nary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 2d -
System Consideration Review la , !b/ ;, 'd, ;, Of - Equipment Enfironmental Qualification Review -52, 5' , 5, 52, 5c, Sf, Sq , 5h, 11, 5j Installed TMI Lessens Learned Implementation S:, 5b . Equipment ::ammary Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Sur:: mary is, 7L, 7c e _- 3 3, , - - , ,- r r - - _ -
# NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-198 d)h Frank!:n Resmch Center FRC Project No. CS257 Page A DMsion of N franMn Inc.Me FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th end Race Stmts. FNa.. Pa 19103 f. 5) 4481000 FRC Task No. MM#
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I
^
~
s l.
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITD'.S ARE APPLICARLE:
-i 3 Tne Licensee (has/' , provided a response to the SER concerns.
X The Licensee (km/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the' applicable DBE - 8 environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows the_re are no
]j outstanding qualification deficiencies.
X The Licensee (bee /has no':) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
~
item whose qualificate a has not been fully established. J Justification for interim operation (#**/has not) been provided by the
', Licensee for this equipment-item.
. Corrective action apecified by the Licensee: ,
. . l
- . Equipment replacement with qualified equipment -- --~
Equipment modification ., Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment ,
. Qualification testing of equipment in progress t Other ( )
i i The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim i operation.
?
The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule. for the proposed
+
. corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
.)
action
- 1
,} The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualitication
.. and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
./
DESICNATION CF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- :j
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
~ ~
" 'q I.a @talified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
+. I.b Modification III.a Exempt .
. [:i l_II.a cuallrication Not Established _] TII.b,Not in Scope
.-j i II.b Not Qualifiec IV Documentation Not Available .
m:;
*6
s NRC Contrue: No. Nr!C-03-N-118
. A(!dFrank!!n Research Center FRC Project No.C5257 PaOS A ow ca n. rr.nkt,Imatuse FRC Assignrnant No.13 2
- c h .na R c. stre.es. Phca.. Pa. 19103 (215) MS-lom FRC Tasg Noc O Un .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICN
SUMMARY
FORM f DESIGNATICN: NRC REQUIREMENTS _ X = DEFICIENCY Ibcumented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X
- Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established _
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule: Established- (If Required)
; Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __
Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate , o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately c Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied criteria Eegarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied
- Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any)' Satisfied -
Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
~
Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour + / unction Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREC-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:
. NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
, I.a Equipment Qualified ' i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
- II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified AI.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life l or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualificatior. Review IV Documentation Not Kade Avail 5ble
- f. b E E b \l d u G. lon On 9qe E f. -
~: -
I 4 I
s,% - NRC Centract No. NFC ']3 M-118 i t.dhrar. Win Resse.ch Center FRC Prc!ect No. C5257 Pago A cr. ..c, os m pren t,:neue FRC Aesignment No.13 3a Sh and Race Str . sm FMa.. Fa 19103 T ) 443-ING FRC Task No. Ado
, ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I
' LICriSEE RESPONSE ';V NRC SER 1
1 il Qualified N Qualification Assessment On-Coing
-p- , To be Raplaced bj a qualified Cccpenent 8*
- w "s1 % e -
r b 3 e 1 O h d
. m O
e G e m immum
i i .
-l .
1 ,s N RC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 U$U' Trank!:n Research Center. FRC Project No. C5257 Page A ctmon oi Th Frank!!n inne. - FRC Assignment No.13 3b -
; Sh and Rue Streets Pda.. Pa.191u31215) 448-100) e , .~ask No. %0)
^
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICAT!ON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I a i LI N SEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued) J No-55 CSED IN RIVISICN
- - 4 {3'6] , l 1
i . N;ns 1 Test specimens in References 23 and 25 were ASCO .Medel
~
No. 's 8300 36 4 F and $ 3 C 3 361Y7. sot = 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. r.CT3 3 E alpment was tested successfully to a higher radiation. cise than enat derived by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicables assess =ent ongoing. i
' ~ '
5072 5 All metallic cc=ponents: not subject to thermal or, radiation degradation at the specified levels. Nof3 6 Equip =ent will be. replaced if qualification cannot bee
,. substantiated.
NOTE 7 Further equipment identi*ication needed to assura applicability of test report. NOT3 8 The $10 OU Trip / Calibration systes is insensitive to pressure changest a pressure qualification test ts not considered necessary (P.MT-Rpt 12770, Revisica A). e e e , _
- e. en o e e=Nw O
-a -,
1 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-M-118
~
4[
$!Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page
'l
# own or m rrankan tneuve - FRC Assignment No.13 5f
.)j m:h .nd a.c. sir..is. Phda.. Ps. 19103 (215) 44s.1000 FRC Task No. 46do .
.j
~: EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. l l l
2 . a.1
-1
-d "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE EVALUATION I
.J X THE LICENSEE HAS NOT ?ROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM TRS MANUFACTURER
'd. WHIG STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS .
EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED A- VALVE ACTUATORS WHICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR 3 RAKE. FOR THE MOTOR-
,] IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR BRAKES (IF APPLICABLE), THE ,
1 CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED.~~(, NOTES I y P.) A, THE LICENSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM IIIE MANUFACTURER
-4 WHICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS 3
EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED
] VALVE ACTUATORS WHICH TNCORPCRATE A MOTOR 3 RAKE. FOR THE. MOTOR-
. .: IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR 3 RAKES (IF APPLICABLE), THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. HOWEVER, DUE TP THE RELATIVELY NON-tIARSH ENVIRONMENT AT THE INSTALLED -
LOCATICN AND THE EXTENSIVE RADIATION TESTING PERFORMED ON _, 1 LIMITORQUE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS, QUALIFICATION CAN 3E i ESTA3LISHED BY EXPERIENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIIIED LIFE. THE LICEISEE HAS STATED THAT THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM WILL BE REPLACEE j WITH A QUALIFIED REPLACEMENT COMPONENT. AN EXACT COMPLETION DATE
'l FOR THIS REPLACEMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE LICENSEE HAS STATED,
., " WORK IS IN PROGRESS TO PURCHASE QUALIFIED 1 REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS. AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN N RECEIVED ONSITE, THEY WILL3 E INSTALLED AT THE NEXT REFUELING OUIAGE."
..f -
THE LICENSEE SHOULD OBTAIN THE APPPOPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM NI THE MANUFACTURER WHICH ESTABLISHES TRACABILITY BEWEEN THE
'. , .h '
INSTALLED AND TESTED EQUIPMENT. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THE CLASS 0? THE INSULATION SYSTEM AND WHETHER CR NOT THE MOTOFIZED VALVE ACTUATOR INCORPORATES A MOTOR BRAKE.
'1 .
t j a
- l. h MOTE G M*
1 % ,* u e." - w
$ P-. PSR
- 43 (Lice nsee. Reference 24 DC) e d N f^ h -
-? :]:I. . -j
4 NRC Contract No. NRC42 73-118 Pags UU3ranktn Research Center F AC F reject No. C5257 A c%.on om. rearun rnume FRC Assignment No.13 3 h ad Race Sheets. Phda . Pr 19103(215; 443-1000 la FRC Tack No. __ . 'Relo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATlON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 e f EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2
-t MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT ~
LIMITORQUE MODEL S3; SIZES 0, 4 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 2
- LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MAIN STEAM ISOLAIION VALVE (IV' 01-02, IV 01-01, VI-33--02, IV 33-01)
- LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): B-1, 3-2 [33]
. FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REACTOR CLEANUP OUTLET ISOLATION VALVE (IV 33-01, -02) i LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): 3-17, 19 (33] ._
4 I im- . . . ~ _ - - . -. DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R , T , gl', RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R) , M, I, GM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, bone, i Not stated, Not applicable t LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS,a . , Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sum: nary Forms 2
- Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, h , ?c, 'Ld-
-?
System Consideration Review '2 'S, '" '
-d 'a '# -
. Equipment Environmental Qualification Review - Se , Db, 1;, 53, I;, 5f,
+3, Ih, 51, Sj-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation h, GL .
Equipment Summary _ Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7, 7h, ~ S
O- ae D,
'j '
' 4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 j ChfFrank!!n Resurch Center FRC Project No. CS257 Page i A owon at n., Frankan Insnice FRC Assignment No.13 Ib
'j .Sh and Rwe Sums. PMa.. Pa 19103 (215) 48-lu FRC Task No. 446
; EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 -
, ,I -
'A J
'l Slid. MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
'd
.1 q
_j X Tne Licensee (has/Mc .nc t) provided a response to the SER concerns.
.~ .* * , , ,~
The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is
]. qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicaole DBE '-j environmental service condi.tions.
4 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
;, !)3 I outstanding qualification deficiencies.
j X The Licensee (has/h .st) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
.i item whose qualification has not been fully established.
i Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the y] Licensee for this equipment- item. Y Corrective action specified by the Licensee
- J da_... . Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
, ;. Equipment modification 2~ ' Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or' shield equipment frors radiation source
._ ; Verify qualification by additional (testing /analy: tis)
.: Equipment relocation to a mild environment ,
Qualification testing of equipment in progress
',jj _,x,_ Other (MPL4ewnNr w duM esmrM suntr4Nrurth )
] The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item 1 that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
.1 operation.
,)(,,, The Licensee (Ma/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed
.d corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective J, action .)
U The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. A .
- DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
-. , ' - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
'] I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
'q ,
h Modification III.a Exempt .
. II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.o Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available t
s 4
. }
t 1
,: ~~~'
'i..* .
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 NFrank!!n Research Center A[ FRC Project No. C5257 Pago a oim .e#IN n.4n inetut. FRC Ascignrnent No.13 - 2 2?th and Pue %cs. PMe.. Pa. 19103 (215) 449 1000 FRC Task No. 4M_ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2_. . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLHMARY FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X .
- Adequate Similarity Betw'een Equipment and Test Specimen Established -
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If. Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation - . - Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate _ o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies . (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i
> DESIGNATION:
s NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
; I.a Equipment Qualified .
'; I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X' II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life .
I or Replacement Schedule Justified m III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.a Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available j , e. e Y O e
i 4 NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-N-118 FRC Frefect No. C52g Page 3d9:enk!!n Renarch Canter i A ch=e of The Asen Innue FRC Aseignment No.13 3a
- - '4 M h and Race Se.ees. FMa.. Pa. 191031215) 4481m0 FHC Task No. 4GCo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 -
' i -
. -}
~ ! LICriSEE RESPONSE '1V NRC SER ,
i
. .] Qualified -
n
; Qualificacica Assessment On-Going
.j M To be Rep 1.sced by a Qualified C:=penent --
Notts CSED IN RIVIs:CN 4 _ {33] . . r , . Non 1_ Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YF. . 1 i sot 2 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. t i 30:2 3_ Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation
'? dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
.s!
NOTE 4 Insulation qualificatien_;er_Ref erences 46 or 47 ac .
. -j applic' abler assessment cr. going.
-1 1 NOTE 5 All metallic componentst not subject to thermal or
, .-j a radiation degradacien at the specified levels.
1 l Mon 6 X Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be
. substantiated.
'c 4
- - Nor3 7 , Further equipment identification needed to assure ~
. applicability of test report.
4
.. j ' -
B0:3 S The $10 00 Trip / Calibration System is insensitire to pressure changets a pressure qualification test is not considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). e
O NRC Contract No. NRC-03 73-118 Page FRC Project No. C5257
$branklin Research Center A cirs,on of The nankt.n inst rwt* FRC Aseignrnent No.1 la 5th and Race Streets. Phi a.. Pa !?1031215) 448 Ic* FRC Tae k Nor. 9b EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 3 MOTORIZED VALVE ACITATOR I4CATED IN CONTALWINT LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB3 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 3 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED
, FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CORE SPRAY LOOP 11 INI2T ISOLATION VALVE B (IV 40-11, -10)
- LICEN3EE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): F-5, F-6 (33]
i _ . ~ . i DESIGNATIONPkRDEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QU, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, j Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: . 3
. Contents Checksheet Page No.
, Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
? .
n .' Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, I;, 2d 1 System Consideration Review I;, It, I, 55, 'c, Of - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 4 St, 50, 53, L, %, l
.; , 53, 55, ?i, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation h, & .
. Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary *:, 'h, 'd
'\
."., l
.==.g ,
-i---m% -m --
NBC Contract No. N RC-03-72-118 Page Q'2J S '.:mFranklin Research Center
' F9C Project No. C5257 A cvwn a w r.3 nun Inimme FRC Ass!gnrnent No.13 Ib
- 20th and Race Streets. Phi'a.. Pa 191031215) 4491W
. FRC Task No. 446
'a EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. iL I -
1 Ji
, .f SU.4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITOS ARE APPLICABLE:
Y Tne Licensee (bas /' r not) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licenseo (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is
; qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ~
environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows the,r,e are no
- .) outstanding qualification deficiencies.
X The Licensee (has/" not) proposed a corrective action for tt.ls equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. X Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equip =ent replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification. . Equipment relocation ,above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment fro:a radiation source , verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress X_ Other (Arnuo-Ament n:~ dwL CMyer ne mrr4rureD ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. X,The Licensee ('n.aa/ bas not) provided a schedule for the proposed
. corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action . )
j The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
- ) DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
- I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt .
Q !bdification II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available . e G e , . - . .,7
NRC Contract No NRC-03-74118 eg in Rewarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago WLffrank A cton a m r,.nuin inerme. FRC Assignrnent No.13 2 i mh .nd Race Stres. Pbca.. Pa.19103 CID 443-1000 FRC Task No. #46 _ _ _ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _f_ .
' EQUIPMENT EWIRON. MENTAL OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM , i DESIGNATION: X_= DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS _ 4 Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate _Y
- Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established '
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation
; Criteria Ragarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate _. Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied m . Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding rest Failures or Severe Anomalies
~
(If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regardin; Functional Testing Satisfied _ _ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satirfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: - X = CATEGORY f NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY 1 I.a Equipment Qualified .
- ; I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
- (
Equipment Qualification Not Established II.a II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life i or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review C IV Documentation Not Made Available J e e 0
. .e.
gw,.- - p ,
,I NRC Ccntreet No. N RC 03-M-118 4 '
Pace
'J0fFrankDn Research C.tnier FRC Prclect No. C5:57 A ci-en d s trav.hn ic arwe FRC Assignment No.13 3a
.! 20th wd Race Sa r es PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4as.iom FRC Task No. 4%
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .L. , LICINSE3 RESIONSE '0 NRC SER
'}
4
- ) Qua1.ified .
y3 4 Qualification As sess=ent Cn-Coing
.jI y To be Replaced by a Qualified Cc=ponent --
. .J,
'. i, Nous esto IN Rrvisten 4
{33] _ No:31 Test specimens in ?.eferences 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s 8300 364r and 8300 361Y7. . NOTE 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. NCTS 3 . Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiatier.
.- 1 dese than that derive.d by engineering analysis.
~ .
, NOTE 4 ,,,,. _ Insulatien qualification per References 46 or 47 as .
. , applicable; assessment cr. going.
Mc 25 .All metallic ce=ponentst not subject to thermal cc
- radiatica degradation at the specified levels.
NOT3 6 . X Equipment will be replaced if qualificatica cannot be substantiated. i HOT 3 7, rurther equip =er.t identification needed to assure - applicability of test report. 8073 S The 510 OU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to pressure char. gest a pressure qualification test is not
+ censidered necessary (TcT-Rpt 12770, Revision A).
0 " 4 4, a
4 N RC Contract No. NRC-03-73-1'8 FRC Project No. C5257 Pago
$UfFranklin Nsearch Center a om u nor w rra e nInsm we FRC Assignrnent No.13 lc ab a,a a.c. Sn.eis rh:'a.. Pa 191u3 :215) 44*1000 FRC Tack No. 4(,b _
. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O_. EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR IDCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING LIMITORQUE MODEL SM300 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS TER CHECKSEEET NO. 4 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 662 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CORE SFRAY BYPASS ISOLATION VALVE (IV-40-05, IV 40-06) LICENSEE SU3SITTAL: SCEW(S): F-4, F-15 [33] DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CI3CLED ITD4(S) CNLY: ~ (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, RPN, EXN, SE!', QI, RPS , None,
, Not stated, Not applicable
-' LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: .
t Contents Checksheet Pace No. Equipment Item la Sunenary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Su:n: nary For: s 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 36, y_ , 3/ System Consideration Review K K K % K, y
' M , % , '/c, 56, S, Sf, Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sg , M , }4., 59 -
9 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation K )(a. , Equipment Surunary Maintenance ano Replacement Schedole Sunnary K%% . h- emIP " *****e 6
- + - - - . , . . _ ,
. .. ..a... . . . . .
I A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 Page
.l NIFranktn Research Center FRC Froject No. C5257 i A Dtm.oei of The Fiar .n Imtuis FRC Assignment No.13 . Ib
.'Oth and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 19103 (2151 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/do j cOUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d.
4
'I St':4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES M THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICA9LE:
1 Tne Licensee (has/t - - - - 4) provided a response to .the SER concarns.
.q
.j 1 The Licensee ths:s;fhas not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE '
j l environmental service conditions. i X The Licensee has presented informatiors which shows t@ere are no outstanding qualification deficiencie s. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
~
Justification for interim operation (hae/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the I.icensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above' submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
,Eqaipment relocation to a mild environment .
Qualification testing'of equipment in progress
- Other ( )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item l that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim j operation. y The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed
.' .! corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective j j action. .)
+1
.i The Licensee states that the equipment iter does not require qualification M ard/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
.1
.. :q DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY _ BASED ON REVIEW 4 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ,
1 Qualified III.c Qualified Life Deficiency] I.a - I.b Modification III.a Exempt . II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Mot in Scope
. II.b Not Qualified IV Ibcumentation Not Available .
4 c - c.m
' %.g I . ,
6 NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pags lilYFrar ktn Research Center
' I A ce,onof Tt riankrainstrute FRC Asdgnment No.13 2 2% ar.d Rua Streets. PN!a.. Pa. 19:03 (215) 44&lW FRC Task No. _ fo ol .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMcNT ITEM NO. 4-I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SL?'_ MARY FORM
'I' DESIGNATIJN:
X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate
,i '
Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established , Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X_
!. Qualified Life or. Replacement Schedule Established (If; Required) _L Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation ~~
Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation $4tisfied (If Required) J Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak . Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate , o Duration Adequate o Required Profile: Enveloped Adequately o Steas Exposure (If Required) Adequate l Critaria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfief a Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied __ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duratio:, Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Rega: ding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) _ f I DESIGNATION: X = CA~TEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY j -
- I.a Equipment Qualified
- .! I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification *
?
II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established l II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified X III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
- - III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
. IV Documentation Not Made Available See La. lumb on Age 5f.
e 4
,. ._ .z -.:~r . - . _ _ . . _ _ - . _ _ _ , _ . _ _ .
NRC Contract No NRC-03-70-118 nkun Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A c: ~en ome r,ar ua rnimu. FRC Aesignment No.13 3a 00th and Rxe Streets. Nf'r. Pa. 19103 (215) 4 3 1000 FRC Task No. #cle i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4
~
LICE 1SEERESPONSE'IONRCSER{t t' Qualified l X Qualification Assessment on-Coing To be Replaced by a Qualified Cc=ponent _, 0 m e G 1 9 e-S 9 4 e 4 e 4
.5
*. s' p
+
,4 di e
O s 9 e
-C. __. _ . - _ .. _ _
NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-73-118 4'd ilfFrank!!n Research Center FRC Prcject No. C5257 Page A DMuon of The Fran'an 1%cte FRC Ansicr.rnetit No.13.. 5f Mt5 and Race Streets. Pht!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. 4% EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM : .O. 4 .. X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE EVALUATION THE LICENSEE HAS NOT TROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER k3ICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO TdIS - EQUIPMENT. ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS k3ICH INCCRPORATE'A MOTOR 3 RAKE. FOR THE MOTOR-
. IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR BRAKES (IF APPLICABLEh THE CLASS OF TdE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED.
X' TdE LICENSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER k3ICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO TdIS EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS b3ICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRAKE. FOR THE. MOT.01-IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR BRAKES (IF APPLICABLE), TdE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE RELATIVELY NON-HARSH ENVIRONMENT AT TdE INSTALLED LOCATION AND THE EXTENSIVE RADIATION TESTING PERFORMED ON LIMITORQUE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS, QUALIFICATION CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY EXPERIENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE. (poTe O THE LICENSEE HAS STATED THAT THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM WILL BE REPLACED "WITH A QUALIFIED REPLACEMENT COMPONENT. AN EXACT COMPLETION DATE FOR THIS REPLACEMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE LICENSEE HAS STATED,
" WORK IS IN PROGRESS TO PURCHASE QUALIFIED
! REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS. AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN
'. RECEIVED ONSITE, THEY WILLd E INSTALLED AT THE NEXT REFUELING OUTAGE." ,
~
l - ' , TdE LICENSEE SHOULD OBTAIN THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATI0N FROM TdE MANUFACTURER b3ICH ESTABLISHES TRACABILITY BETk7.EN THE l INSTALLED AND TESTED EQUIPMENT. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY l THE CLA3S OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM AND b3ETdER OR NOT THE MOTOFIZED VALVE ACTUATOR INCORPORATES A MOTOR BRAKE. l
- l. ,
2953.INf a- Esl$t w si .t n, w c ;-1 n 4 7- .
.F
-\
w a _a . ___m__.m______..__ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O
; 4 NiiC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page
~. i$hranklin Resserch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A owon of Th. Fran'en :ns:stute FRC Assignment No.13 5g
, 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. %(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4
. t.
.j '
NOTES: A. /A fl A A AAd'ZU Y M".1 Ji duAsJed W, s4 dmf Woha
'1 &o 40 wu o,n n/ / .w ni. G .X k -
8 % ,i L
~ ~i
- Ein s k % J L ; A J E 4 %
/b A JA J n M e % 9' 6 2 dl 1 maw/
A A% k 4 w,a . % % J i ~i ana .au1 A das sA i1,A a' 'f+'n 'a $ 'Y7u xin f mifia Di .
% "(A' A d d n-sk d W xa,&,.
i.
~l. "..Y MiY 1 4 u.s A s 29- /17 a- 4/0 GM_
sJi - AAnAG A? %, eL l c!'uNTnh.' YY L uM Lk Asa; dn % dd
. cL.a fn G A w a si n A d l'i.e.
J (}ular-
~
J
/o c AA ' . 3 n2 ~ /
WM 1.A01 t3 1 A if 0- 1 I
^: <:fi~ a /mbs!# zo be / /
//
N 6
.{ O tY tL4A)At M . $Af .
l {l () ' I
~ '. C-o uca_u (io4 -
- ' b lA >A zu2A I~ A N_td h XJ20 ~
(3w A b s'2tik. (kfs&o W. s W -
~:
n"deussm a p , A G' zt Leu il 6 xA -
. nAJAjis $ /7 A a. 02>w n S E/ taa./ 50 S P bt2.4 /t .
*[ NiiC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118
.I - Ob.-Q' J Frankhn Rewarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pags A o w.s.on cf m Franun instrui. . RC Assignment No.13 20th ano Race Sheets, Phi!a.. Pa.19101 CIS) 44810m I a.
FRC Task No. 4fo fr EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EOulPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER AREA LIMITORQUE MODEL SMBO REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKS'-IEET NO. 5 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 662 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER WATER ISOLATION (IV . i 93-27, IV 93-28, IV 93-26, IV 93-25, IV 93-50, IV 93-49) . LICENSEE SU3MLTTAL: SCEW( S): N-ll TEROUGH N-16 (33] 4
.ep ._ .
DESIGNATION POR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:
, (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
R, T, Ql', RT, P, H. CS,hS, (R), M, I, W , RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable
~
LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHEX'KSHEETS: j Contents Checksheet Pace No. Equipment Item la I Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, A , 3G
. System Consideration Review _*?. th, 0;, !d, te, 42- -
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52 5' % Sd, !:, Sf,
~
Sg, Eh, 51, j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, Ch- . Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary '2 'h, 7; -
, Q,, m NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page
. ., ll J Frank!!n Research Center
- A DMsen of The FranW Insmis FRC Assignment No.13 lb
] :'Oth and Race Streets. Pht!a . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 imo FRC Task No. 4Db 7
d EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d
.i
't i
SU.MMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - CNLY C3ECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
'I
] A Tne Licensee (has/; - z u provided a response to the SER concerns.
6-i X The Licensee (W/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is d qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
--j The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no . 's cj outstanding qualification deficiencies. ~ '. X The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a cor:;ective action for this equipment I item 'r'.cse qualification has not been fully established.
X Justification for interim operation thss/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualif'ied equipment Equipment modification . - j , Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
'j +
Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress d Other ( )
..' .The Licensee has provided other information for this equip' ment item 4 that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
' ,.[ operation.
- The Licensee (bas /has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed 2
~
corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective actica .), sd The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, , .{
and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
- - DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW J' - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt . III.a Qualification Not Establishedl III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available . b
\
t
A NRC Centract No. NRC-03-79-198 FRC Project No. C5257 Page lbYFrenna Research Center A nwo o# The rrankta lmnuis - FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race S*reets. Phra.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/d EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _E .
, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLHMARY FORM DESIGNATION:
NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X, __ Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established-Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately % Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) % Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding TempSrature/ Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequenca Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)' DESIGNATICN:
, NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualifie[1 .
i I,b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.o Equipment Not Qualified
; II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life
; or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
_j III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
! IV Documentation Not Made Available
- ,, Q.
6- NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03-79-118 USNFrank!:n Research Center FAC Project No. C5257 Paco A civo.on of The r,en .r.n ineture FRC Aselcnment No.13 30 20:h and Race Stims. PMs. Fa.19103 C15) 4481000 FRC Task No. A'olo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM No. _5_
~
LICDISEE RESECNSE 'IO NRC SER (lj) Qualified 4 . X Qualification >.asessmene oa-coing To be Replaced by a Qualified Cenpenene __
- e-e Ed "e-
- e h
r . e elf m M O e h a O
NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 d_ 4 Franklin Rc54 arch Canter FRC Project No. C5257 Page A owa ein. Fraokta ineue FRC Assignment No.13 3b Sh and Race Sbuts. FMa.. Ps. 19103 (215) 4:81M3 FRCTack No. %G EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFiCATON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E LIGSEE RESpCNSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued) A7-ES USED IN REVISICN 4[35] , stns 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 -ere Asco .Medel No.'s S300 354r and 93C0 361YT. scT3 2 N Cualification assess =ent ongoing. ECT3 3 Iquipment was tested successfully to a higher radistier. dose than th&t derived- by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as , applicables assesscent ongoing. , 5 di :: - - - . . - 90:25 All metallie ecmponents: not subject to thermal or-radiation degradation'at the specified levels. Nof3 6 Equipmenc will be replaced if qualification cannot be i substantiated. - s0:3 7 Further equip =ent identification needed to assure applicability of test report. sc:2 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to pressure changes a pressure qualification test ts not considered necessary (TcT-Rpt 12770, Revisien A). , O e e A W e, we-.- 1
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-G118 Psce dI . 4[FranMin Research Center i FRC Project No. C5257 FRC Assignment No.13 5f A Division of The Frank!in nsmute - 'j 20th and Re<e "neets. PN!a.. . a.19103 C15) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4dalo
- i. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT IT -
I e
"X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE EVALUATION 4
1 THE LICENSEE HAS NOT 'PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTUR
'r WHICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICA3LE TO THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIW THOSE MOTORIZED l
VALVE ACTUATORS WHICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRAKE. FOR THE MOTOR-
. j IZED VALVE ACTUAIORS A'iD MOTOR BRAKES (IF APPLICA3LE) , THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFI'ET). /'90TE1) 4
'S THE LICENSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED DOCLTENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER ,
WHICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM. TdE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATCRS WHICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRAKE. FOR THE MOTOR-IZED VALVE ACTPaTORS AND MOTOR BRAKES (IF APPLICABLE), THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE RELATIVELY NON-HARSH ENVIRONMENT AT THE INSTALLED LOCATION AND THE E.UENSIVE RADIATION TESTING PERFORMED ON LIMITORQUE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS, QUALIFICATION CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY E;(PERIENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE.
. THE LICENSEE HAS STATED THAT THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM WILL BE REPLACED
,, WITH A QUALIFIED REPLACEMENT COMPONENT. AN EXACT COMPLETION DATE FOR THIS REPLACEMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE LICENSEE HAS
- STATED,
" WORK IS IN PROGRESS TO PURCHASE QUALIFIED
, ,;' REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS. AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ONSITE, THEY WILL3 E INSTALLED AT THE NEXT REFUELING OUTAGE." .
- THE LICENSEE SHOULD OBTAIN THE APPPOPRIATE DOCLTENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH ESTABLISHES TRACABILITY BETWEEN THE INSTALLED AND TESTED EQUIPMENT. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIM y
THE CLASS 0? THE INSULATION 3YSTEM AND WHETHER OR NOT THE
< MOTOFIZED VALVE ACTUATOR INCORPORATES A MOTOR BRAKE.
..,3
~
1.. %m ' '
% ;220s]
biKD .4cpf. a8, t18I cu .J.ctli< w M k. m u s t
}w ~
3whnub58 f AbtNar - e
~
1 .
A' N RC Contract No. N RC-03-79-198 Page Ubbhrank!!n Fesearch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A ou,o os m rranku rns:aute FRC Assignment No.13 5g 20:h and Rus Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44 1 1000 FRC Task No. No(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMEtJTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM No. _5. ; , NOTFJ: ,
$. At Ad19 kM / lAbfl Y /ZMAA 4 a n,f Mi%a dus*ki ham - .
do 40 um on,,&,a syi. Ga;< X te Nuuau ' w On z~/blU Lil:618b2;~m
'ni 4 2 AAJ nn L uf a-1 %$ duf wniL w A AM k4 &na . A WJ=
/
a~a au1A
/
dw, sk ol AA ' a- $ Jn
/
uw/ A i. 'wu AEnt/~A2
%i- "clu,1, 6,' an.z A- J W mk
% unt1 w 32 0 laa. vdwn'
~
2xli a dj' bs /Julf i< # % oEu di%ir . ' ## L wJA Lk Asa 2n % 6d G $ Laak ' a e w & d 6.e. OnJurus J
. /o c Los ' . 3 ~A / .
~ Aw,a s h, 2///fs W w a ,a D 1~ a 0mA),s' u bus l b *
. .i .
- ii O LA . MAJA wn . x< $AAdf s* .
f g' / COA)CLVSlos3: vu, n a id s d id + vac- - 6Ls L w A. 0 A ua ir.i ho mor km' Es C w ld w ux1EM
* *f s
N RC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Prcject No. C5257 Page li L rank!in Researer, Center
. A t%uon os m rranan Instdute FRC Assignrnent No.13 1a
., M and Race Streets. Phda.. F a 19103 (215) 448 !M FRC Task No. %la
, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. b i J . .
,.j EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6
'.! MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR IDCATED IN THE EMERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLATION VALVE
'd CUBICLE
'j LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB2
-- [ ; REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 110UR 4 ;$ TER CHECKSHEET NO. 6
, . -j LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 43 "1 - FUNCTION (PLANT ID): EMERGENCY CONDENSER. ISOLATION VALVE (IV 39-08, IV 39-07,
.0 IV 39-09)
J LICENSEE SU3MITIAL: SCEW(S): B-1, B-9, B-11 [33] 4
.-i
. 5. : . '
i -
.~
O .; ; _ . ._ a DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLY:' - (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, O*, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, GM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable g
- LISTING OF APPLICABLE CMTKSHEETS:
i 4 Checksheet Page No. Contents
., Equipment Item la
~
m- Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb , ~.. Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
. +. (
- 3a, 3b, M, $
- f Licensee Response to NRC SER y, % % % )(, M SystemC'onsideration Rev!.ew ,
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 56, )(, S , Sf,
$ Na K, Na N - ; .s ,i Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation % e)L ,
Equipment Sumary i Maintenance and Replacement Schedula Sumary K % ')k *
. , . - _ _ , . . . _ _ _ . , _ .- _ _ - . 4 . . -
l 6,.4 NRC Centract No. N RC43-73-118 A FRC Project No. C5257 Psgo 000J Franklin Research Center A Cim.cn d The Franun Insnture FBC Assigoment No.13 lb 20fh and Race Snees. Pbca.. Pa 191031215)448 1NO FRC Task No. 4l.olo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. b2. . t
.; SIMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED I'" EMS ARE APPLICABLE:
a X Tne Licensee (.scrdhas wea) provided a response to the SER concerns.
; X The Licensee (6. se/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is
- qualifiad and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE.
envirorusental service conditions. , The Licensee has presented information which shows there-are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (t:C/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. . Y Just-ification for interim operation (h=cs/has not) been provided by the ,
> Licensee for this equipment item.
_ Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level
, Relocate or shield equipment from radia, tion source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
Equipment relocation to a mild environment - Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) c, _ The Licensee has provided other information f6e this equipment item I that can be construed as a basis .for justification for interim i operation. The Licensee (has/has not) providedascheduleforthepro[osed
< corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
. ;, action .)
The Licensee states that the equipment iten does not require qualification
~
and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
,q - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See twtion 3 of this TER for Legend) ,
i . I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency - I.b Modification III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope QI.a Oualification Not Established) ' Documentation Not Available II.b Not Qualified IV , 1
- , . , .- -- - - , , .-0
6FJ Fr nniin Rese ,ch center NBC Contract No. N RC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C52S7 Page
; A om, ed Th. Frank:in Instruse FRC Assignment No.13 2 Eth and Race Streets. Ph!!a.. Pa. 19103(215) 443-1000 FRC Task No. 4dp
. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlFMENT ITEM NO. (z.
t u 3,. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM I s DESIGNATICN J NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY
~.
> Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X 0,M' Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
~
X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Y
' ' .-; Program Established to Identify Aging De2radation
- Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfieci!(If RequirM)
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exp.sure i o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate
~ ? o Duration Adequate P.i o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequata
, Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied 5.-i Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied:_
-0 Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce '.'atisfied - ( _
*I Criteria Regarding. Test Failures or Severe Anomalies
. (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding - Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy. Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied -
+ :) Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
;i
.:+
DESIGNAT'CNs
', [,h . NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY . 0.:-
y', I.a Equipment Qualified y'i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification -
.i II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established ')( , ,' II.b Equipment Not Qualified ,
- s II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life t..j or Replacement Schedule Justified.
'] .
III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
,%, , j, III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review j IV Documentation Not Made Available 3 .j .
I See Evab.4lon on 'Pu e Sf. y .
.- . .. . -. ~ . - . .- - . - . . --
NRC Centract No. NRC43-79-118 Pago A[ CU Frank!!n Research Center FRC Prcitet No. C5257 A Divis.on of The Frank!!n Instmie FRC Aasignment No.13. 30'
, Sh and Rue Serms. Phda.. Fa. 19103 (215) 4481W FRC Task No. Mvh EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. In -
1 LICDISEE RESTONSE 'IO NRC SER {lh 1 i Qualified , N Qualification. Assessment-On-Coing1 To be Replaced by a Qualified Cceponent -- a w G
-. ._. -4 9
e. I s 4 i . T 4 4 j . . l 4 t , f ( e e
l .
,Q NRC Contrac*. No. NRC-03-73-118 Udb&ranMin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page
[ , , . A civen et Th. Prank!in institute FRC Assignment No.13 3b-rth ano a.c. Strw.s. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. dio6
- (' .i
'.[. .;
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .S2
~
- .,J
, 'vi 1 LICENSEE RESPONSE ':0 NRC SER (Continued) i J :,
}- .
. , NCTIS USED IN Rr?!SICN 4 {3 f NOTS 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Medel
, No.'s 8300 364F and 83C0 361YT.
~
scT3 2 Cualification assessment ongoing.
- so.3 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiatior.
dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
~
MorE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as
.. applicabler assessment ongoing. ._
s .- 1 McT2 5 ~ All metallic ceepenents: not subject to thermal or radiatica degradation at the.ipecified levels.
-1 .
.' j NOTE 6 i
Equipment will be replaced if qualification (.annot be substantiated. - 4
'. 8
- c. ] NOTI 7 _ Further equipment identification needed to assure
..,' applicability of test report.
_ '. 3 BCTE 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration Systers is insensitive to a - pressure changest a pressure qualificatica test is not
" ' .;]- considered,necessary (3MT-Rpt 12770, Revisica A).
?
4
..: f ';-:. . l ,~.;
t m o O O
~
?.
1. 4
- 1 e t
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-70-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Paga nklin Research Center
, A 0:ws.on of W Franklin Institure FRC Aedgnment No.13 5f
. 2Cth and Rxe hets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443-1000 FRC Task No. 2/clo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. la .
"X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE EVALUATION X TdE LICENSEE HAS NOT TROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER *
%dICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFT TdCSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS WHICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRK<E. FOR THE MOTOR-IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR BPAKES (IF APPLICABLEJ, TdE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. -(NOTE 1)
TdE LICENSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM TdE MANUFACTLTER WHICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS WHICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRAKE. FOR THE MOTOR-IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR 3 RAKES (IF APPLICABLE), THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE RELATIVELY NON-HARbH ENVIRONMENT AT THE INSTALLED LOCATION AND TdE E'/ TENSIVE RADIATION TESTING PERFORMED ON LIMITCRQUE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS, QUALIFICATION CAN BE ESTA3LISHED BY EXPERIENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE.
. TdE LICENSEE HAS STATED THAT TdIS EQUIPMENT ITEM WILL BE REPLACED WITH A QUALIFIED REPLACEMENT COMPONENT. AN EXACT COMPLETION DATE FOR THIS REPLACEMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE LICENSEE HAS STATED,
" WORK IS IN PROGRESS TO PURCHASE QUALIFIED REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS. AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ONSITE, THEY WILL 3 E INSTALLED AT THE NEXT REFUELING OUTAGE." .
THE LICENSEE SHOULD OBTAIN THE APPPOPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH ESTABLISHES TRACABILITY BEra'EEN IEE INSTALLED AND TESTED EQUIPMENT. TdE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY ~ TdE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM AND WHETHER OR NOT THE MOTOFIZED VALVE ACTUATOR INCORPORATES A MOTOR BRAKE.
\. MA/.A. M.A. c2 ct.
W Apr 9,/98/, n & .,oddfa-
~
m -
, , ,, A. NBC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e' liUh! Frank!in Research Center FRC Freject No. C5257 Page A Di.rsion of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20*h and Rue Streets. Phh.. Pa 1910312:51443-tmo FRC Task No. 4/o b
; EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 q EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 MOTORIZED VALVE AC1'UATOR IDCATED IN CONTADiMENT
~
LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB; tIZES 000, 2, 3 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR 2 TER Cnr.CKSHEET NO. 7 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED
,..'j FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRYWELL EQUIPMENT DRAIN PUMP DISCHARGE ISOLATION VALVE -
(IV 83.1-09, -11)
- LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): D-4, D-5 (33]
, FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CORE SPRAY LOOP G12 INLET ISOLATION VALVE A VALVE OFERATION (IV 40-09, -01) __
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): F-17, F-16 [33]
.t
~
,f 4 -
,.'. .:::: ^_ :L. - - . --
'[{ e5 h DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:
'i (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
~
..r if R, T, QT, IC , P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None,
-) '
' 4 Not stated, Not applicable
' .i:
LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
. ; Contents Checksheet Page No.
- .j j.j Equipment Item la Ud .] "
Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
* .;j Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Form.e 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, :, 2 d-
*j System Consideration Review 42 't, 's, 4 0,, 4u ,. 4f .-
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review h- . 50, Ed, 50, 5fr
! -ES , Sh, "i, ~i -
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Sa.-4b r , Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 'b. 'O r
i 4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pace
,, 'dd Frankhn Research Center A D:wson of The Frankhn !nsdtu:e FRC Assignment No.13 l b.
20th and bce Streets. PMa.. Pa 19103 r215) 4481000 ' FRC Task No. 4(, c EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. v
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICA3LE: X Tne Licensee (has/'" "t) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically sta,ted that the equipment is *
. qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicablo DBE environ = ental service conditicas.
The Licensee has presented information which shows there a.re no
, outstanding qualification deficiencies.
X The Licensee (has/h2r vt) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation 'hae/has not) been provided by the Licensee.for this equipment item. X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
- -~-
Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergense level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment - Qualification testing of equipment in progress
.x_ Other (ff.3MCEMGN7" /C (EUAL. CstNNo r 22 fuB3n:N7~M r5D )
. The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
~
.] that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim i operation.
2 Y The Licensee (r.+e./has not) provided a schedule for the proposed
. corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
' I
., DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
] - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for' Legend) ,
i I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt
- II.a Qualification Not Established III,b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ,
h 4 i - .
^
i _ ~ _
~. . . . .. . . . . . . - .
A NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 Page d ankEn'Res.tarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Di 3.on of iha Frankhn Insmute FFC Assignrnent No.13 2 j 20th and Race Streets. Pht!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44& 10 @ FRC Task No. 46G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _Z I.
.1 4 QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATICN: NRC REQUIRfMENTS . X = DEFICIENCY
; Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate Y-
, Adequate Similarity Betieen Equipment and Test Specimen Established -
Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately i Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) i Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __ Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate i o Duration Adequate . o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied
- Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria.Regarding Test Sequence 1 Satisfied , 2- .
Criteria Regaliing Test Failures or' 'Severe ' Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY 1
- I.a Equipment Qualified ,
I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X
, II.a Equip:nent Qualification Not Established 3
II.b Equipment Not Qualified , II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
'q J. III.a or Replacement Schedule Justified Equipment Exe2npt From Qualification
, ]: III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review 1 IV Documentation Not Made Available 3 .
1 j . e
~
r I - l
-- _ _ _ _ _ = .. . ... .,
A NRC Ccntract No. NRC,M-79-118 UUUDran'en Research Canter FRC Prefect No. Cd257 Page A Oiw ci N Fred?.n !ncrute FRC Assignment No.13 30 20:h .no Race sn. ts. PMa.. Pa. 19103( 15) 443-1000 FRC Task No. 4GG ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVlGV OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 . LI O SEE RESX:NSE TO NRC SER Qualified - Qualification Assess =ent On-Coing Y To be ?.eplaced by a Qualified 0.:spenent ' 4 NoTIS USED IN Rrvis!cN 4 {3 t NOT3 1_ Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCC Medel No.'s 8300 364F and S300 3d1YF. , ECTE 2 - Cualification assess =ent enioing. 30:3 3 . Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dess than that derived by engineering analysis. hot 2 4 insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as - applicable; assessment engoing. NOTE 5 All metallic ce=penents; not subject to thermal or radiation degradation at the specified levels. NOTE 6 1 Equip =ent will be replaced if qualification canne- be
. substantiated.
NOT3 7 . Further equipment identification needed to assure
~
applicability of test report. sot 2 S The 510 CU Trip /Calibratien System is insensitive to - pressure changes; a pressure qualification test is nct considered necessary (3:tT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). e G o e o a
4
.OJ N RC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 Pags
'; 4[Frar.
E0$! Min Research Center FRC Pro.iect No. CS257 A musen er m erananInsnrute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets, ft.Ja.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 10 4 FRC Task No. 4M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REV'IEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f__
~
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8
?? '
MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EFERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLATION VALVE
. CU3ICLE ' ' LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB; SIZES 000, 2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 EOUR TER CHECKSEEET NO. 8 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 662 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): EMERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLATION VALVE (IV 39-10)
- LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): B-12'[33]
FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRYWELL N2 VENTILATION & FILL ISOLATICN VALVE (IV 201-31)
'{ ,, - LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): D-9 [33}
4 x. . .. _
~<
e 3. 2; w3 =- n - 13 t DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: ~ (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, Rr, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHEKSHEETS:
~
Contents Checksheet Page No, t Equipment Item la s?^
% ', p Sumary of Licensee Respor'ses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualifict tion Summary For::ts 2
,' l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 20=
,2 :-
System Consideration Review 'a, C, 4w, b, e, of
- 1. 3 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, !;,-5d, 5c, Sf,
',' Sg , J.,h , Si, Sj- -
1,. Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ga, 65- , Equipment Sumary
.j Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary h , "* b , h y ;f*
f f ' - , . w e, a p -e- ..e
NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03-73-118 A' khn Research Center diffran FRC Freject No. C5257 Page A DW;n ol N Dankt;n incture FRC Assignrnent No.13 lb; 20:h end Rue Streets. Phda., Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No, Mob EQUIPMENT ENVIRdNMENTAL QUALTICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2L . SUtiARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER -ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICULE: N Tne Licensee (has/lu) provided a response to the SER concerns. E The Licensee (bas /has not) specifically stated that the equipment is , qualified and/or will function when expmed to the applicable DBE' environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
'/ The Licensee (bes/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item wnose qualification has not been fully established.
X Justification for interim operation ('
- has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.
Corrective action specified by the Licensee: _. _ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification , Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment - Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) _ Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
.; that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim 1 operation. -
?
The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
.- : The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
d DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEJORY BASED ON REVIEW j - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ,, I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency ~ I.b _ bbdification III.a Exempt l II.a Qualification :.ot .staousns$ III.b Not in Scope II.c Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available .
.4 m
W y, 9- -- . ,,, - - - <
. ' NRC Contract No. NRC43-70-118 Q,,,a Page UdLil Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Duw>n a w Franun Insenne FRC Assignment No.13 2 M:h and R*cs Streets. Ph:!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/pla
~I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _
's EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate K Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established )(
~
Y Aging Degradation Evaluated' Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) K i Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If RequirYd) 1 Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate _ o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied -- Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied _ 4g_.., Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies - (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied .~ Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY
. NRC QUALIFICATION CAT' GCRY
.3 f, I.a Equipment Qualified -
.? I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II._a Equipment Qualification Not Established 1
- II.b Equipment Not Qualified
;j II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
., J III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
- III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
- ' IV Documentation Not Made Available t
Ml See hl%Kon on Page. EE - s; . e P se
,u NRC Contract No. NRC43-73-118 4,}U'J Ul FrankEn Research Center FRC Freject No. C5257 Pags A Olcsion cine nar.k:a lnsmd 3a
- M and Rue Sae,-e. Phce.. Pa. 19103 (21S 443-10C0 FRC Assignment No.13 FRC Task No. 4lf [S EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllilCATION_ REVIEW OF EculPMENT ITEM NO. 8 .
LICD1SEERESPONSLTONRCSER(g8} Qualified k Qualificatiors Assessmant: On-Coing
- To be Replaced by a Qualified Ce=ponent --
._"j _-
w e. 5 e
?y i
m O
*A
. 1
;3
,, A NRC Contract No. N RC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page UU!! Frank!!n Rewarch Center
- A civ un e4 na Funkhn Insu:ut,e FRC Assignment No.13 3b j 20:h and R.ce Screets. Phca. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTaskNo %6
.; EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITE,M NO. 6_
LICENSEE RESPONSE ' 0 NRC SER (Continued)
- NOTES USED IN RIVTSICN 4 {33}
s . e e e
<3
' * * -; N0:3 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 25 were ASCO Medel No 's 8300 364F and 83C0 361YF.
- scT2 2 N Qualification assess =ent ongoing, g r. CTS 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than thAt derived- by engineering analysis. .
NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicables assessment ongoing = - Nors 5 All setallic components: not's'ubject to thsrmal or radiation degradation at the specified levels. NOT3 6 Equip =ent will be replaced if qualificatica car.not be i substantiated. , NOTE 7 Further equip =ent identificatien needed to assure ' applicability of test report. SCTE S The 510 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to
'.,..- pressure changes a pressure qualificatica test is not censidered necessary (KMT-Rpt 12770, Revisica A).
}
, i
,~e,
* .a
- f. ~j
, ,- } .
eI g
'"^.
'g%"
-< .~,
o _ _ . _ . _ _
NRC Contraet No. N RC-03-73-118 A'2$&nk!'n Research Center FPC Project No. C5257 P6C3 A cnrucn of Th. Franan terwie - FRC Assignment No.13 Sf-Mo 20 h and Race Sueets. Phta.. Pa. 19103 (21L n31000 FPCT sk No. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _O. .
..2 "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE EVALUATION X THE LICENSEE HAS NOT 'PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH STATES TdAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICA3LE TO THIS .
EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE' LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS WHICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRAKE. FOR THE MOTOR .
~., . IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR BRAKES (IF APPLICA3LE), THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. ~T,9CTE1) . THE LICENSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH STATES TdAT IHE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIiY THOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS TdICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRAKE. FOR THE MOTOR-IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR 3 RAKES (IF APPLICABLE), THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE RELATIVELY NON-HARSH ENVIRONMENT AT TdE INSTALLED LOCATION AND TdE EXTENSIVE RADIATION TESTING PERFORMED ON --
h LIMITORQUE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS, QUALIFICATION CAN BE - .
. ESTA3LISHED BY EXPERIENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE.
THE LICENSEE HAS STATED THAT TdIS EQUIPMENT ITEM WILL BE REPLACED WITH A QUALIFIED REPLACEMENT COMPONENT. AN EXACT COMPLETION DATE i FOR THIS REPLACEMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE LICENSEE HAS STATED,
" WORK IS IN PROGRESS TO PURCHASE QUALIFIEP'
.j REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS. AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN
. RECEIVED ONSITE, THEY WILL3E INSTALLED AT THE NEXT REFUELING OUTAGE." ... THELICENSEESHOULDOBTAINTHEAPPPOPRIATEhpCUMENTATIONFROM i THE MANUFACTURER WHICH ESTABLISHES TRACABILlh BETWEEN THE INSTALLED AND TESTED EQUIPMENT. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THE CI. ASS 0? THE INSULATION SYSTEM AND WHETHER OR NOT THE MOTOFIZED VALVE ACTUATOR INCORPORATES A MOTOR', BRAKE. I L. La ~ a #"L h t2# ds a 8 1 5s ~ f 2C,ubipae da%~# .dy2. 28; /ffI w/uh w w at adraatst. - e 1 P o
-- _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ____ ____
' ' N RC Contract No. NBC-43-73-118 I. Page
- JUO riankun Research Center FBC Project No. C5257 A Ns.on of N Franklin inetute FRC Assignment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phi!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443-1000 FRC Task No. M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _8 o
NOT~5 s S. $SFAsAff D # lMAf it /T %44 b i Cb&n,d bnh sk Nuund i Us'nLi . . . . . . . - . oirs A2;. i/) Mi.[deX k A cd a 40 une '
!/Juiis k #skUilkd4%
i i 1
'n,injAA w a %2'sr wwis A AM bd Ma%%1
/
nsiln .Ouloseid da ss s w wArA '
/
e ha /twv/ A2r . 'V/u A Ja~pi m 16 i
% "c" m L su n s W n
% w i 1 sasA25 0 Jira. '
~
. 4'O ujax
. 1>21 a dj A.tY$0 Y % a.oN Abw3.' -
0/ L uM K)s Au; A %e dak
-. 04 A u l m ks2513 L s ! v w & d D.e.
A 0nJu/wis ~ !~ /0 *C Soli- ' .1 es 2) m
.. l^ an_s Juaia b W> 1lJ/Ms e/ a i 6
- / n o /
,dj pm a mAAts]
to 444 b 2 . ./ . //
- n o u- win msw . D #A146 D .
/
1
/ d' l i ,:
~) : -
' ~ .0 . Coxwsdo: - OubbiI63& /1rdbic-w X.e ~ Ausiiss nAnis2V
~;
LLs a w % - >23s u ' 1p
N - -
______z__-______ _--- _- - - - - - - - - -' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-128 4[ id!Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 Page
. A Dwon of m franun Insume FRC Aesignment No.13 l q.
20th and Race Strecs. Phh.. Pa 19103 (215N4& l0* FRCTask No. 4O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9
) EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 ,
5 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING l LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB000
- REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 EOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 9 j LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 662
.1 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VENTILATION &- PURGE ISOLATION VALVE OPERATION (IV 201-07)
'2 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCIW(S): E-1 [ 33 } ,
FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRWELL AIR VENTILATION 5- PURGE ISOLATION VALVE. OPERATION-(IV 201-09) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): D-2 [33]
! FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VENTILATION & PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 0?ERATION (IV 201-17)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCG(S): E-8 [33] t . . _ ~ _r_+_ ) _ . . . _ . .m DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Le<3end) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R), M, I, CM, RPN, EXN, SEN, h RPS, None, i 1 Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: ' s Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la i Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
^
Equipment Environmental Qualification. Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b,- c, 2d -
,j System Consideration Review -4 c , Ib, Ic, 40, 4c, G l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sc, ~b, ~c, ~C, e, Sf,
~
- Sg, Eh, 51, 5F Installed TMI T essons Learned Implementation 6, L .
. Equipment Sume.ary *
- Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7b, 7;
*
- e-n a
- s S &
< '. NRC Contrac? No. N RC-03-73-118
. , Obrsnk!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A DMs.cn of The Frankt:n instaute lb i 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 ' FRC FRCTaskAssignrnent No. No.13 No [0 i
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ' 9
~
"5 SIIMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER -- CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
t [ Tne Licensec (ha s/'=r ;) provided a response to the SER concerns.
. X The Licensee (W'has not) specifically stated that ' the equipment is
, ~j qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE
, environmental service conditions.
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no 7
-j
' i {. ou.tstanding qualification deficiencies. ;' l C
The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this eqcipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacrement with qu# ikfied"hquipment ' Equipment modification is i ' Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or. shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )
. The i.icensee has provided other information for this equipment item
'.[.'fi tha.t can be construed as a basis for justification. for interim operation. .
j - . .
, - - 'j The Licensee (has/ bas not) provided a schedule for the proposed
- ' corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
. . . DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW 5,; - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified III.c Qualified Life Deficiency)
.A I.b Modification III.a Exempt
- i II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope
.,; II.O Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ,
) 4
./
vy i 8
.s..
i A NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-70-118
' FRC Froject No. CS257 Page Mil F ank!!n Research Center A o mon e# TN rianun inete FRC Assfonment No.13 2~
, 20th and Race S r rs. Phaa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 48 lmo FRC Task No. 4/If EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 i
.f.
I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SL'MMARY FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMEN'"S X = DEFICIENCY
.e
~
t Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate - Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established _
- Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately.
X l Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X_ j Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation -- Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfiec (If Required)
') -
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate
'} o Duration Adequate
! o Requited ?rofile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criseria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied l fj Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied
; Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied.
l Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied . l . Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:
'i NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified ,
lj I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification _ Equipment Qualification Not Established II.a II.b Equipment Not Qualified
'} II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life j or Replacement Schedule Justified X III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
,~ IV Documentation Not Made Available a
*4 See. Emludion on 9% e E -9.
w I _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ .. cp e , e
NRC Ccatract No. NRC-G3-7J-118 Pago A[-00 Franklin Rexarch Center FRC Project No. CS257 A C;w m eine Ft 4%!ri June FRC Assignment No.13 3o 00:5.n4 oc. sn.. Pw .. Pa. 19103 (211) 443 1000 FRC Task No. 4Mo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICAT!CN REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9
~
LICINSEE RESPONSE '1V NRC SER {l Qaalified - X Qualification Assessment On-Coing To be Replaced by a Qualified Component I l s
+-
<e
-N--4.-1F'*
- *9 '*g l
. =
t 1
% .g Ti Y
a b L
..h*
e 9
+
4 s
- . . _ . __ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ es _ _ m * *
- I 4,' NRC Centract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No.C5257 Paqq-UdJ rank!in Rewarch Center
; A ci%e ca n.ranknninsreue FRC Assignment No.13 3b 20th and Race Streets. PhA. Pa. 19103 (211) 4*S-1000 FRC Task No. %G 1
. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAOFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 9 i LICSEE RESPCNSE ':0 NRC SER (Ccntinued) s-4
' ,) NCM S USED !N Rr.qs!cN 4 {33] .
4
~i
.i .
j . NCc3 1 Test specimens in Ref erences 23 and 26 were ASCC .M odel No.'s $300 364F and $3C3 3617F. I i ac 2 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. I NOTE 3 Equipoent was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than enat derived- by engineering analysis. m4 Insulation qualification per 3eferences 46 or 47 as
. appl,1 cables assass=ent ongoing.
-3 - . I 5072 5 All =etallic ecmponents: not subject to e radiation degradation at the specified l;hermal evels. or NOTE 6 ~
Equip =ent will be replaced if qualification cannot be i substantiated. . NOTE 7 Further equipment identification needed to assure applicability of test report. 50:3 8 The $10 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to
- pressure changes a pressure qualificatica test .s not-
- considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revisica A). .
s h
, em O
e 9 4 4 4 m 4 m e e.,
NRC Contrcet No. N RC43-73-118
- 6. FRC Project No.C5257 Page UiEFrank!!n Research Center A os.uon er TN re.nkfin inuwie 13 5f ms ennm sn..m rhe... F.19103 ma 44s.imo FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.Mp _
, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITE ,
t "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE EVALUATION L
,l TdE LICENSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED DOCCENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER
! WICH STATES THAT THE CITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS
- EQUIPMENT ITEM. TdE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY TdOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS WICH INCORPORATE A MOTOR BRAKE. FOR THE MOTOR-IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND MOTOR BRAKES (IF APPLICABLE), THE
'. ] CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTDi MUST BE IDEhTIF5EI).
X THE' LICENSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED DOC WENTATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER
- WIG STATES THAT THF ,:ITED TEST REPORT IS APPLICABLE TO THIS
'I EQUIPMENT ITEM. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIFY THOSE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS WHICH INCOPSORATE A MOTOR BFAKI. FOR THE MOTOR-
'. IZED VALVE ACTUATORS AND M0f0R BRAKES (IF APPLICABLE), THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM MUST BE IDENTIFIED. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE RELATIVELY NON--HARSH ENVIROhMENT AT THE INSTALLED LOCATION AND THE EXTENSIVE RADIATION 4 TESTING PERFORMED ON=
LIMITORQUE MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS,, QUALIFICATION CAN BE . ESTABLISHED BY EXPERIENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LI THE LICENSEE HAS STATED THAT THIS EQUIPMENT ITEN WILL BE RE, PLACED WITH A QUALIFIED REPLACEMENT COMPONENT. AN EXACT COMPLETION DATE FOR THIS REPLACEENT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE LICENSEE HAS
- STATED,
" WORK IS. IN PROGPISS TO PURGASE QUALIFIED
',j
- REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS. AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN
. ! RECElVED ONSITE, THEY WILL3 E INSTALLED AT IHE
? NEXT REFUELING OUTAGE." '
. THE LICENSEE SHOULD OBTAIN IHE APPPOPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM
TRE MANUFACTURER WHICH ESTABLISHES TRACABILITY BEIVEEN THE c4 INSTALLED AND TESTED EQUITMENT. THE LICENSEE SHOULD IDENTIET 7j THE CLASS OF THE INSULATION SYSTEM AND WHETHER OR NOT THE MOTOFIZED VALVE ACTUATOR INCORPORATES A MOTOR BRAKE.
.. ,.:) Y A 2 da%d .>4;d- 98, t9t/ asb6L m _
~
MM A . 0 9
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 6banidin L.l. I Rewaich Center FRC Preject No. CS257 P'QO A caw, o# N rianen tniciute FRC Assignment No.13 Sg
- 0m and Race Sne. s. FMa.. Pa. 19103(2151 443-1000 FRC Task No. 4bh EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 9 .
NOTES: 2.. & b e sicip kAd Atd #Ad ;u d et via l d o s , s d s o ,' , 4 aLwf bs % a
//
80 Y tAl 1sf 02121 A > sb A1YJ. M ,_ .
$4-w_w '
au Osz~0id ?L:AJ$A,%
% inas-;J ankt s Asnuw a A% b4 waa '7h W ad
/
/1.6 / 08 0PAb LJA s'?? Ad) .At
' !/n 'o!u- Di . V/u x i s 2 4 1 m A di i
~
. a
%1 (' w di m $ 2 . sis K Y W juant _ ^
- a "
% n,21 nea s s. 0 v/ ~'
)YJ 'se l} Ad 2 W dJ' OA 4-4 ,.
~
ANEuh. ' #Y 1 JA D, Asd An hs dA~ cCa ? L 'w a k a n' A h e. . Onhwa ~ :^/o c b h '.) a n, Wo4_A LAC)C 1 _A lJ' 0,W 1 s f E I a E m /v ,! " e s - besY si b
. . .i . .
_ OtK ttAAJA wsA JA SAAd./A . _ . .
/
/ d' O ooctu cio4 -
a - a 1 - 6 % J A l k A <- /3,hrw 1 8. s 142a ~ n ik.w s K Lu/' d,d 6na is -6M adu . e a i s_1lbsjs!=Y1lJs /% ) a M W. n trn $ i/ < a s / slh $0
& Aas suf Aca- 5 .V
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 4'da!5ankha Reearch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page
; A Divis.cn of The Frank!.n tnstitute FRC Assignment No.13 lc l 20th and Race Sneets. Fltra Pa 19103 GIST 4481000 FRC Task No. 4Ll,
., EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. IO
. ~
'7 EQUIPMENT ITEM No.10 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING
, LAWRENCE MODEL 26DCSWPS REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSEEET NO.10
. LithMSEE REFERENCE (S): 23
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRWELL OXYOEN SAMPLING VALVE (IV 201.2-26, IV 201. 2-29, IV 201.2-25, IV 201.2-23, IV 201.2 -24, IV 201.2-30,
- IV 201.2-28, IV 201.2-27)
LICENSEE SU3MITTAI.: SCEW(S): D-17 THROUGH D-22, E-9, E-10 [33] 3 e
.; 1'
' -" "i- _ _ . _ . _ . _ . ,
rs e e DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY: ~ (See Section 3 of this TER for Le<3end) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, L'XN, SEN, QI, RPS', None, Not stated,' Not applicable LISTLNG OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: , i Contents Checksheet Page No.
. Equipment Item la
- - s Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb "1
Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary For:ns 2 3a, M. ?, !?-
.] Licensee Response to NRC SER
, .. System Consideration R2 View 's. ?h, ?c, !d, k, M -
.~i Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, ! , II, !:, 5f,
~
*0. S', !i, !j
~
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation A, 2 ., Equipment Summary Maintenance and Repl acement Sc'hedule Summary ~ , 'i , ' r E o
- ~ - . . - - - , - o -- , 3 g 9 ye,
, A NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118
. AUIffranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 PaQO A D% c# n.a r.anun inw. FRC Assignment No.13 ltr
. Oc.8.nd nac. snmt Pht!a.. Pa 19103(215)44010cc FHCTask No. %Ce EQUtPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10 a
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECXED IT .S ARE APPLICABLE:
! M. Tne Licensee (has/i : t) provided a response to the SER concerns.
The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is ,
, qualified and/or will ' function when exposed to the applicable DBE environrental service conditions.
/ The Licensee has presented information which shows there-are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
X The Licensee (has/L .n) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. i N Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
. +2. Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
; Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
Equipment relocation to a mild environment - Qualificatien testing of equipment in progress f
.)L Other ( Qua.li nca3noA l'*ecs men +_ O n - a o*i n o.)
.J
)
] The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. M The Licensee Oewer/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed
; corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective action .)
j _ __ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification cl and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. 1 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW 1
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) __
i I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
- i I.b !bdification III.a Exempt -
Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV D>cumentation Not Available . l l
* "g
=
_~ _ _o ._ u_ ._ _
=
s NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-73-118 lb Frank!!n Resaarch Center 4[J FRC Project No.C5257 Pago A D.. .on or n.e n nklin tninture . FRC Assignmont No.13 2 20th and Race Stnets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(oCo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIROtiMENTAL OUALIFICATION St% MARY FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate _ X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established - Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
- Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Requiie3) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures j o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied u f ,, _ ~, -,, Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Kn6malTes . (If Any) Satisfied 4 6 - - Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied ~ Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified -
; I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
. II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life .
l ' ' /g or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification 7 III,D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review a IV Documentation Not Made Available
'1
'i -
*4 1 .
[ D g 4 + 9 e s no...4 .
,o e e . m e.wm .me a e e, e - - e
*v" -
w-e-- .- -~~,m-..g -
.,g ,__ ,gm , , . . y a _s_o,
NRC Centraet No. NRC-GO-7J 118 A' J bbrank!!n Research Center FRC Proket No. C5257 Fago , A cimen a The rianen incrue FRC Aecignmont No.13 3o a ?S and Race St..ct Ns. Pa. 19103 (215) 4*S.10N FRC Task No. 4G6-
) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF ECulPMENT ITEM NO.10
,J
'j .
LICDiSEE RESPONSE M NRC SER 3
)
i
'44 g Qualified
- .i J X qualification.Assessmenc On-Coing .
.j To be Replaced by a Qsalified C:=ponent 3
El4-3 1 g i t % NC"!S USED IN REvis!CN 4 {3 5031 ~ Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Medel No.'s 8300 364F and 83c3 361YF. NOTE 2' N Cualification assessment ongoing. - ECTE 3 - Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than tnat derived by engineering analysis. a NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicabler assers=ent engoing. a
,, e5 All metallic ecmponentst not subject to thermal or
, f , radiatica degradation at the spect!!ed levels.
-1 Nofk 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualifica ica cannot he i
substantiated.
, NOTE 7 Further equip =ent identification needed to assure applicability of test report.
MCTE 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration Systern is insensitive to
- pressure changes a pressure qualification test is not censidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revisica A). .
e e
i As NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 Page C00lf Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 A ora ioine FranktnInst'tute FRC Asc!gnment No.13 5f. 20:h and Rus serweis. FMa.. Ps. 19103 (2153 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(ofo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10-a NOTFS . Aww?x 53 m reek CD o No. W T
, Jim._L e 500 M 500 HP h Am'ro a . rA % h c~a. g %~As.
m ~ca ca a.A :ne en. % n .: xA
. E% % % _ 'l 5 G
- 4 e
e O O
- -e E
+4 & s
- a. O b
8 Yg b '
'l
.S ~, t
.. s 1
. .t . .
, <4
'a=
l b { . O 9 9 3 9- e e asin mm - e e. am . , 4 %, ,a , , ,e , ,,ag, , . , , , , , , , , ,
. - , - , - , _o g - +-- p, -.3
----~.--- . .
1_
I
- } NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118
-; dL Franklin Research Center FRC Prc; ject No. C5257 Page A own or The Frankten inwaute FRC A3signment No.13 lc MS and Race Streets. Phi!a . Pa.1910h2]S) 44 Wax) * ' FRC Task No. %(s
; ECulPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFlCATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. II
~
., EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 11
-l SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN TEE STEAM 37NNEL DECCO MODEL 24166 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR .
; TER CHECKSEEET NO. 11
~
- LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED-FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MAIN STEMI BYPASS ISOLATEJ VALVE (SV 01-05, SV 01-06) '
, LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: S S (S): D*-6, 3-P'[33]
-i
.]
I . f
._ : - ---. ~:--, - --- . _ - . - ,,
t . _ DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Le<3end) j i R, T, QT, RI, P, H, CS S, (R), M, I, (M, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: .
- Contents Checksheet Page No.
A Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
.g Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
]
.I ,
Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, -25, 3%, 3d
' ~
System Consideration Review *;, Ib, ?;, 40, 4c, of-f ' Equipment E..*ironmental'U alification Review Ja, L, ;w, 50, ;u, fr ,
- s , =, = , u Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -0 ; , Cb Equipment Summary
! Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary Q, , -,4 e = s=e m - w +v -, w
i
; D'I _ ' NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-198 1
dJ Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Ctw.on cf The Fren':n Inserme FRC Assignment No.13 lb j 20th .nd Race sir.eis. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 Imo FRC Task No. 466 ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E_.
. .I l -
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES M THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: _2g. Tae Licensee (has/* - re t) provided a response to the SER concerns.
; _,, The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~
,n The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
f _g,The Licensee (has/hv -t) proposed a corrective action for this equiptaent item whose qualification has not been fully escablished. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. _2f,, Corrective action specified by the Licensee M i :- =._ Equipment replacem'ent with qualified equipment Equ.pment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level . Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source , , , , verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress
.X Other (#sMMu~ MENT n: dual c.wNd7 Af <TUBf74W7M72~h )
.j The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
. that can be construed as a basis for justification for interia j operation.
i
} M The Licensee (sus /has not) provided a schedule for the ' proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
.i, The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, 3 and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
7,4
.'q DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
,- i - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Il ' h Modification III.a Exempt - II.a Qualification Not Established III.b lbt in Scope
, II,b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available .
e j l e
i A NRC Contract No. NRC43-70-118 FRC Prcject No. C5257 Page
$ Frank!:n Research Center A De.on o( The Freeiin !nst.tute FRC Assignrnent No.13 2
.Oth aw Rue Streets. Phh., Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. d 6 d.
. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1A ,
. ,1 5
1
; EQUIPMENT ENVIRO!NENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS . X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X , Adequate Similarity Betdeen Equipment and Test Specim n Established ' e Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately fl Qualified Life or Replace =ent Schedule Established 'If Required) -- 1 Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation
! Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
$ Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
, o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately
. o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding' Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Crit'ria e Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functio'nal. Testing Satisfied ..
Criteria Regarding Instru:nent Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied. -
- Crite'ria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
.3 DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY 4 ' l I.a Equipment Qualified
' I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X 7
, 3 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established 4
II.D Equipment Not Qualified
] II.c Equipment Satisfies All RequireIcents Except. Qualified Life
} or Replacement Schedule Justified
. III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available G
e e e g
. . _ . NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73118 000 Franklin Research Center .., FRC Project No. C5257 Pece A Divmon ci N Frant'in fractute FRC Assignment No.13 30 1
- orn .n4 a.c. se..<s. FM... Pa.191c3 cli 448 lom FRC Task No. 4GCo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N - ,
LICriSEE R.ESIONSE 'IO NRC SER Qualified . Qualification As sessment On-Coing X To be Replaced by a Qualified Component -- NOT!S USED IN REVTSICN 4 33] ,, s_ sot 3 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Model
;, No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YF. -
NOTE 2 Cua2ification assessment ongoing. I NOTS 3 _ Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived my engineering analysis. j
.i Norz 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as' applicsble; assessment ongoing.
NOTE $ All metallic ccmponents; not subject to thermal or radiatica degradation at the specified levels. 4 4 No?3 6 X Equipe.ent will be replaced if qualification cannot be substantiated.
-1
.: NOr3 7 , Further equipment identification needed to assure ,
applicability of test report.
,3,. ,
1
- NoT2 3 The $10 CU Trip /Calibratien Systes is insensitise to
' ' pressure changes a pressure qualification test is not censidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A).
/
9
uF n NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 Pags
'd5 Franklin Research Center FRC Prciect No. C5257
- A Dvs,on of The Fi ren tmew FRC At signment No.13 lm
' 2m ud Race Sheets. PSita . Ps 19103(2 9 448 1000 FRC Task No: Tbb .
. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. IZ.
*i ,
j EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 12
'j SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING j DECCO MODEL 24166
'j REQUIRED OPERATING IIME: 1 EOUR
! TER CH!.JSHEET NO. 12
-LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED j FUNCTION (FIANT ID): CONTAINMENT SFRAY INLET ISOLATION VALVE (SV 80-36, *
~'
- SV 80-16, SV 80-35, SV 80-15)
LICENSEE SUBMITIAL: SCIW(S): D-1, D-14, U-15, D-16 (33] 1 9
;* .i:
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) S, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, 1 Not stated, Not applicable
'l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: '
.?
Checksheet Page No.
. - Contents ,
-l la Equipment Item Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
]
Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2h, ?:, 25
, : System Considera~ tion Review '., ~, i., ,J, L, if * - . ~ *^ "#
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review h, %, , !d,
-* s, 2, ?! %-
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~;, N Eq.tipment Summary Mai.ntenance and Replacement Schedule Summary *m , 75, 70-i
, ,,.-y '
4 NRC Contraet No. NRC-43-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page 000 Frank!!n Research Center o A Duon of W Frank!:n fnerme FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and R ca Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 two FRCTask No. 444 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /&. i a SU.d. MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: -
,,g,Tne Licensee (has/.'wo-no4) provided a response to the SER concerns.
The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ~ environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows t_he_re, are no ,' . outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (has/he 4 aet) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualific ation has not been fully estmlished. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item.
& Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
Equipment replacement with qu511fied equipment * " Equipment modification a5 .- Equipment relocation above submergence level Reloc;ste or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environm,ent , Qualification testing of equipment in progress X._ Other (/fM4*fMEN7 n:~ CJuel c4Wyer As luntrMn.4rsD ) j The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item i that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim 3 operation. a _2(, The Licensee (ees/has not) provided a schedule for the ' proposed '- corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
.. . The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
E-j DESIGNATION OF RESUL"' ANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
; - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
~
,:- I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt .
, II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available '
e O 9 9
f . .
- I NHC Contract No. N RC-0?.79-118 Q[,J FranWin n Research Center FPC Preject No. C5257 Paga A Die a m rman sentus FPC Assignment No 13. L
. 20th and Rae Sheett Phita.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #- 6 6 i,
i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.11 , 1 s ~$ 4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM t DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY 1 NRC REQUIRhfiENTS ' i Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Betdeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established
'j Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately
;, Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Estaelished (If' Required) --
j Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) S Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied
- Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies
' (If Any) Satisfied e
Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
-l Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
' Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
' DESIGNATION:
X = CATEGORY
$ NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY f.
I.a Equipment Qualified y Equipment Qualification Pending Modification I.b 3 II.a Equi; cent Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified
- II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Lifc 5 or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available j
'l a
f
. .c- NRC Ccntract No. N FC-03-79-118
'" F9C Prc{ect No. C5257 Pace UUU Franklin Research Canter A otm.cn ed Th runknn ineue FRC Assignment No.13 3o 20th and Race Streets. FSaa.. Pt 19103 Cli) 443120 FRC Task No. 4Gfo
~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJF1 CATION REVIE'N OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. f.&_ ,
.. i 1
LINSEE RESPONSE '1C NRC SER e J t
, Qualified -
! Qualification Assessment Cn-Coing X To be Replaced by a Qualified Cc=penent --
6 )' NOTES USED IN RIV!SICN 4 3"j] - . i, _2 . . .
, 7-HOG 1 Test specimens in Refer 9nces 25 and 26 were Asco Model No.'s 8300 364F and 9300 361YT. .
so:2 2 Cualification assessment ongoing.
. , McT3 3 - Equip =ent was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
f*]
.1
. 'I NCPTE 4 Insulation qualification per Ref erences 46 or 47 as -
- s. applicable; assessment er. going.
a ICTE 5 All metallic cceponentst not subject to thermal or - radiation degradation at the specified levels.
.) .
M7f3 6 )( Equipment will de replaced if qualification cannot be
; . substantiated.
- f 1 - NOT3 7 , rurther equipment identification needed to assure ,,
1 applicability of test report. NOT3 $ The 510 CU Trip /C4113:atica syste:s is insensitive to -
. pressure cMar.ges: a pressure q :alification test is not 4 considered necessary (RMT-ape 12770, Revision A). .
=
M e G
. g
.w. 1
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 j gEd Frank!in Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 Pago g
, A c v s en of Tu r:anktn !=rute FRC Assignment No.13 la NIS and Race Streets. Phca.. Pa 1910.1 C1'd *490 FRCTask No: % h-
'l i
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO, _ll. EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 13 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE REACIOR BUILDING ASCO MODEL HVA904058A
, REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 EOUR
; TER CHECKSHEET NO. 13
! LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 24, 4673 4 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONIROL ROD DRIVE SCRAM DUMP CONTROL (SV NC-15A,
- i SV NC-16A, SV NC-ISB, SV NC-163)
. LICENSEE SU3MITIAL: SCEW(S): R-1 THROUGH R-4 [33]
1
.' j a . 9 .
i e 1 l .
- hb
- _
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
- T, RF, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, ,
Not stated, Not applicable I LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEEy: , t Checksheet Page No.
. , Contents Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, -05, O;, M
~ . , 4L, ' 'd, 10 If Lystem Consideration Review ,
i 6, b, L, :2, !c, '5 f , 1 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review
- Sy,:L, ;;, :j-i Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -G , Ob
- Equipment Sumary
~
Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary - c. , 7b, 7 %
- - - e n g #n y
4 NRC Contract No. NRC43-73-118 .
. Q'krank!in UIJ Research Center FRC Project No.C5257 .Page
*. A Dusan of The reanun laetute _FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race $neets. Pfu a . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-lfrio FRCTack No. #da
; . . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.13 f
a SUAdARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECXED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLFs s
/ Tne Licensee (hasr . r) provided a response to the SER concerns.
.. l The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is
. qualified and/or will function when expered to the applicable DBE '
environmental service. conditions.
.) 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows th,ere are no
- outstanding qualification deficiencies.
, X The Licensee (ha s/' - -t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. ,
Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment ites. [ Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equipment replacement with qualified -equipment ~ _ f.e . Equipmant modification Equipment relocation ab ve submergenc'e' le~ vel-Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment , Qualification testing of equipment in progress
)
1 Other (Weolsc.ernmingonhbeskim e m ne4 be subhbded, The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item. that can be construed as a basis for justification for interia
.i , operation.
1 The Licensee ts me/dtEie) provided a schedule for the' proposed
~. ' s corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
; action . )
'? ..
fj The Licensee!. states that the equipment item does not require qualification-and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
,- .;j ;
' d DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) c- '
' ' .l* I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
#2 d J Modification III.a Exempt . -
.', : Z1'.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope
. II3 Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available .
e-p 4 e^ s 9-_ , p,g 4 e 6ema e . *'O - * , w,. a. p J .e
i A NBC Contra ct No. NRC-03-M-118 FRC T'rciect No. CS257 PAGO WJfrcMn Rmarch Center A o, s.cn u m ri mn in ste FBC AsM;nnent No.13 2 rs . 3 Rx. sr.., . rse .. P.19:03<215)448 10 0 FRC Tr.ck No. _%Io EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I3
'i~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICN SUVMARY FORM
' . 4' DESIGNATION:
X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate _ Adequate similarity Between Equipment and Test specimen Established Aging Cegradation Evaluated Adequately K Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aoing Degradation ~ Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) J_ Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criceria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified '
. I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification [~X__
- II.a Equipment Quhlification Not Established 11.0 Equipment Not Qualified J II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Ex::ept Qualified Life ,
j or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i i
.i e
i 4
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 E,;r Frank!!n _ Resenth Center FAO Profect No. C52g Pc00 A D+wn cf The FrankhnInseMe FRC Assignment No.13 30
, 20:h and Rxe Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103(211) 448 1000 FRC Taek No. 4lefa EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. 43
. ~
LICriSEE RESPONSE ' 0 NRC SER Qualified Qualification As'sessment On-Coing
- I To be Replaced by a Q2alified Component
' ~~
D43 NO-!S USED IN RIvtsIcN 4 {33]
, 1 " ) +-E = ~ . : -~
~
.~, ; -
it 9 Nors 1 ~ Test speci= ens in Ref erences 25 and 26 were ASCO .vedel No.'s 8300 364r and 53C3 36177. note 2 Cu'alification assessment ongoing. 9072 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiatior. dose than enet derived by engineering analysis. I to:E 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicables assess =ent or. going. , BoTE 5 All metallic ccmponents: not subject to ther=al or radiation degradation at the spec 1*ied levels.
. NOT3 6 1 Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be substantiated.
' -}
3 NOTE 7 ,, rurther equipme'nt identification needed to assure applicability of test report.
.A 5075 8 The 510 CU Trip /Calibratien syste:s is insensitive to pressure changes a pressure qualification test is not ,
censidered necessary ( TJtT-Rp t 12770, Revisicn A). e
.e t -G -
l 4Ub FranMin Research Center NRC Ccntract No. NRC-0179-118 FRC Prc}ect No. C5257 PcGo A owan of m r:ankan tnitituis FAC Ass:gnment No.13. 5f - Eth ar.d Race Sems. Phi!a.. Pa.19W31215) 44810re FRCTask No. 4(ofo - EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFlCATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.13
.l $
d h ,s, - %~73 (. Gs R - 097 - A- ON . , s o_. da i mm e % wo c/n b d . kA h A.4 , < d m e o AC A Asto ] dL b HVA- o i 3ew, Ar-Tab c c- o0 JAAma E o--- cr b r s_ m , < a1.m / 2.. a.s / _-- e _ k _ J J- d ' (o d1.. TL T rundJ e m O_meem L1 4h .mo us , , me.e4 6 6-4_n AdAo . d-kwfM M M p_m i a o . i tie /YL9 om n Ea>VL Me an#1M Ak M & M d t tf h W 1. 4 I1m
-4 N Mh a_o4A T
& , Akk e m Mu n%S L l no,A com b h- -4 th M <t _
g s oa a u_s D s' rO. .D O . ec'Sim xM A r S.:o .
. DAIDLA5Jn A
.% n ., M h n
'Reh -s e 24 .lo. % n u_ch A. . n\ ab m A _
~4 %
A N c>rt_C . . b M b So.C0etadiw m ermtw % h
.d '
% 0 tutuu Mo _ '
s /Z.0 .
# PECCMP&l2VIT/CN .
O '$ CCf h W.-*.
. t O f .Wh h * $ 14 $ } ~
.A. - a 7 p s b << g up a . w d ,u % .er pr yic.n n 4ph deed.
, &f , ;4o slyaNgomT .ckd/& sh=d." .
S
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 Page ddFrank!:n Research Center FRC Project No.CS 57 A oemn oi m rranun ineMe FRC Assignment No.13 - Sg
. :oth nd R.c. streets. Phr .. Pa.,19103 (215: sein FRC Task Mo. 4Gfo
, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. n 9
3 NOTES: Oh
- i n. m n b A -141 n f Ao
_O t c o me k n o; c0 haJ1 o. t 2. w,a s n OM a RL __o_:0 o h
.3 . .
O t 'Ts U %-
.M:m m...nmud &eesi m
% \
et ;O'N s . m M .*a O Map Orrsit_ddiS Se MoltW e 24 .
; - i l
Tkn_. ewAmhw nyutdlu - oh-ca_. 3,w m . 0 4_h . i AC AJT1e A LQi_ _
\
TT e a e NL .
\
A e
>e 6 .
ma_= - . - e ee m e
.e h
F e e d 4
. c:
9
',3
.rSi !,
.<j ,
O e
- . t e
w *
'g
-w -
- A NRC Contract No. N RC 03-79-118 Paga
- AdFranklin Resench Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dv4.cn of N neen snue FFC Assignment No.13 l a, 2'h5 aw Rm Sws Ph.'s . Pa. 19103 42:51444 lisX) ' FRC Task No. Ybb-
- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /4
*s b .
l EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.14 - g SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT e GENERAL ELECTRIC MODEL 1525VX l REQUIRED OFERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CEECKSHEET NO. 14-LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED. FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE PILOT AND POSITION SWITCH (POS NR-108A TEROUGH
,' NR-108F)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): C-3 TIEDUGH C [33] 1 4 3 i s
. I
.i i
. - ;~ <
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Le<3end) R, T, Gr, HT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I , VM , RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, , Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: -
. Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la 4 Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ' " , , Oc, Oi
~~
. System Consideration Review '2 't, !c, Id, !;. If Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 54, ao, ac, ac M c, ~, C N , ;., Oi, ~j-
! Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Om, S -
} Equipment Summary
~ Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary ,7 m , 75, 4
\
h-9 G .
A NRC Contract No. NRC43-73-198 brink'In Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A oim,on os m FranMa Imtmne FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race $rrects. PMa.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1 2 0 FRC Task No. f'66 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /4. SUM.ARY OF LICENSEE RESIONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: __X,Tne Licensee (has/W "^t) provided a ' response to the SER concerns.
.o
.; The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE -
environmental se.:vice conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows the,re are no
' outstanding qualification deficiencies.
)( The Licensee (has/" rt) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established ~ .
Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the
; Licensee for this equipment item.
1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: _ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
> Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level ,
Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment ,' , Qualification testing of equipment in progress L Other ( A*rpt Aespryr is du42. cAmr nr .runerar/Arrn ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
, that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. -
_i, The Licensee (h+e/has not) provided a schedule for the ' proposed t (: <:orrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective 4 sction .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or shoul.$ be exempted from environmental qualification. E.9IGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- '2 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for T49end)
I.a II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
~;
. @ Qualified Modification III.a Exempt .
,II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.d Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available s
I y G
r-j A NRC Contraet flo. NRC-03-70-118 Pago MFrarA!:n Research Cenic FRC Prejact No. C5257 A owen el The r,anun Imrwe FRC As !gnment No.13 L Mth and Race Strwts. Phi;a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4 4 1000 FRC Task No. W.4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JA , i
- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NPC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X
- Adequate Similarity BetVeen Equip:nen't and Test Specimen Established ~
- Aging C4 gradation Evaluated Adequately ,
Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
~,
Progra;n Established to Identify Aging Degradation -- Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate _ , , o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Expor.,ure (If Reg tired) Adequate
- Crit?ria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Sub:sergence Satisfied Criteria Regaiding Radiation Satisfied.
Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies
~
(If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
' DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified . I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification k' ,, II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipmant Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Dce2npt Frora Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available , f e a s !
1 4 NBC Ccntract No. NRCO5118 CU FranWin Rmerth Center FRC Frclect No. C5257 Pace A 0~un of The rmue rannas FRC Acti;nmcnt No.13 3a
, .Trh a..4 Raee Sereats. Phde.. Pa. 19103 '211) MS 1000 FAC Task No. 4GCo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /f ,
I.IcrNsts arsrCNSE TO NRC SER Qualified . Qualificacice .b ses s=ent Cn-Coing X To be Rdpliced by a qualified C.:=penent -- so-ts esEn !N nrvisicN 4 {33] NOT3 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s $300 364F and 8300 361YT. . Nor: 2 Qualification assess =ent ongoing. NCTs 3 _ Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiction dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as-applicable; assessment ongoing. NOTE 5 All metallic c =ponents; not sub3ect to thermal or radiatien degradation at the specified levels. NOf3 6_ X Equipment will be replaced if qualificaticn cannot be
, substantiated.
NO!3 7 , rurther equip =ent identificatica needed to assure , ap'plicability of test report. No 2 S The $10 CU Trip /Calibratica system is insensitive to pressure changes: a pressure qualification t-st is not considered necessary (MT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). I
,. A NRC Contract No. NRC-43-79-118 il TranMin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A D rtc.n d The BanM.q hshMe - FRCAssignment No.13 la
. m.nd me, su.,*t Phra.. Pa 19:03 a:5H 81* FRCTask No. 466 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. If j EQUIPMENT ITEM No.15
; SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN TEE REACTOR BUILDING
! ASCO MODEL 8300361RU REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CEECKSHEET No.15 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TORUS N2 MAKEUP AND BLEED VALVE CONTROL (SV 201.2-06, ,
i SV 201.2-33)
; LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): E-4, E [33 ]
'h l
l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, r.T, RT, P, H, CS, A S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, 5 Not stated, Not applicable
; LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: .
Contents Checkshebt Page No. Equipment Item la
- j. Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-?b, 2-, 30-
~
-4 55, ' , '#
[. System Consideration Review 'd, 't Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Ia, Eh, 50, E', I;, 5f r ,
~;, Ch, Ci, 5j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6, 2 -
~
Equipment Surmaary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 70, , 'O e ae
' A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page d9 rank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dome of TN Tranau inimm FRC Assignrnent No.13 -
Ib
%:h and Race Streets. Phh, Pa 191031215) 448 lW FRC Task No. 444 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25~
l SU.tiARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABM: 1 Tne Licensee (has/h:: not) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/nas not) specifically stated that tha equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ' 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows the_re.are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (has/h m ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licen:.ee for this equipment item. _g., Corrective action specified by the Licensee: 5I. Equipment replacement with qualified equipment gj y Equipment modificatiwn Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress
,,2C Other ( 67uM/me A 7'sw AUE UMEM7* MM G0/Af6 )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. l . 1 The Licensee (he/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT 3RC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt . Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ sme o ==ge esww* * * * - " *
- p=.
~ .. . _ .
4 u NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pago t d'$Il l Frank!!n Research Center FRC Profoct No. CS257 A D:m oa ct N Frank':n Instaute FRC Assigarnent No.13 2 20th and Recs Sbeets. Phila Pa. 19103 (215) 44%10m FRC Task No. f66 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. II . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL OUAL7FICATION SCV. MARY FORM DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X
- Adequate Similarity Betdeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established '
Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) -- Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate-Criteria F.egarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied _ _ Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) LESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY LRC QUALIFICATIOM CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified . [ I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.a II.D Equipment Not Qualified
. II.c Equipment Satisfies All Pequirements Except. Qualified Life i
or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
'j i
E 2 0
6- NRC Centract No. NPC-03-79-118 Page NNrankEn Reuarch Canter FRC Prefect No. C5257 A Ciwucn of The Fran'an inetute FRC Ass!cnment No.13 30
- Dh and Rue Su.m. Phca.. Pa.19103 CI) 448120 FRC Task No. 4fo(o EOUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /E ~
s racniszz Respcusz m Nac sza .t Qualified . Qualification Asses =ent On-Coing
. X To be Replaced by a Qualified Componenc .
t s s . ._ N W USED IN . ITSICN 4 {33] - , .-a ---
. . . . . .+
NOT2 1 Test speci= ens in References 25 and 26 were ASCC Model . No.'s 8300 364F and S300 361YF. . 50:2 2 1 Qualification assessment ongoing. NOTE 3 _ Equip =ent was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived my engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as. applicable; assessment engoing. NOIE 5 All metallic cceponents: not' subject to thermal or p radiatica degradation at the specified levels. NOT3 6 Equipent will be replaced if qualification cannot be
. substantiated.
NOT3 7 . Further equipment identificatim needed to assure - applicability of test report. S0:2 S The 510 DtJ Trip /Calibratien Syste= is insensitive to pressure cha..ges e pressure qualification test is nce censidered necessary (R.MT-Rpt 12770, Revision A).
O 4 NRC Contract No. NRC-33.M-118 _ FRC Freject No. C5257 eage UUUll Franidin Research Center A Cimon of The Frankh Ins:tute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Rxs Sher *s. FMa.. Pa. 19103 (211) 4".3-l @ 0 FRC Task No. 4 fog EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ./E_ - LICENSEE RESICNSE '10 NRC SER Qualified - Qualification As sessment On-Coing X To be Replaced by a Qualified C:mponent _ i 0 47
~
NOTES USED IN REv!SICN 4 {33] s . . NOTE 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 25 were ASCO Model No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YF. ,
,m 2 1 Cualification assessment engoing.
scT3 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiction dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as, applicable; assessment engoing. NOTE 5 All setallic cc=ponents; not subject to thermal or radiatien degradation at the specified levels. NOTE 6 Equipment will be replaced if gaalification cannot be
.. substantiated. *s NOT3 7, further equip =ent identification needed to assure '-
applicability of test report.
.The 510 DU Trip /Calibracien System is insensitive to SOT 2 S pressure changes; a pressurs qualification t-se is not censidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A).
E
NRC Centract No. NRC-03-79-118 d, Frank!:n Rewarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago a Des.cn of The Fr mn :neture FRC Aseignmeni No.13 lc
. Th5 and Race Greem Pht:a.. Ps 19103 (215) 448 Inte FRC Task No. %b EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Ib .
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 16 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE EMERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLATION VALVE CUBICLE ASCO MODEL k"/LB300372F REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO.16 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1552, 24 FUNCTION (PLANT- ID): DRYb' ELL N2 MAKEUP AND 3LEED VALVE OFERATION * (57 201.2-32, SV 201.2-03) LICENSEE SUEMITTAL: SCE'J(S) : , D-10, D:-12 [33] s 4 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITE4 (S) ONLY: * (See Section 3 of this TER for Legand) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) ,' M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, j ZIotstated,Notapplicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHEX'I:3HEETS: . Checksheet Page No.
. Contents
' Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental. Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2c, W
-- : . S , 4;, 'd, '2 ?" "'
System Consideration Review - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf,- c;, ek c4. si Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation E2, ch Equipmen't Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 92, 7b, 'c-
9 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118
' & FRC Project No. C5257 Page idlf Franklin Rexarch Center A DMs.on of ne riankLn Ins::tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb Sh and Rxe Streets. Phda.. Fa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4(olo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1(e.
i SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: i
.X Tne Licensee (has/_'u: -M) provided a response to the SER concerns.
The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
- l 3 The Licensee has presentedlinformation which shows ti12re are no
'l outstanding qualification deficiencies.
.X The Licensee (ha s/'--- b) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
Ju.atification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.
.X Corrective action specified by the Licenseer
-- ~
Equipment replacement with qualified equipiiedt'~~ ' Equipment modification . . . Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment celocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress
)
1 Other (Rrn.M.Extw1 tv Gunuricmo se caw hier 1W. suesT Amt Nrto The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
- that can be construed as a basis for justificatica for interim operation.
- 1 M__ The Licensee (neer/has not) provided a schedule' for the ' proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
- 1 .
ihe Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification a M and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
+ DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this 1ER for Legend) .
~
II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.a Qualified - III.a Exempt Q Modification III.b Not in Scope
. K.4. Qualification Not Established II.o Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Avai.'.able ,
i e f g J ; .O
A NRC Contract No. NRC43-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page iM&anldin Rcauch Center A Dim.on of The Franun Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 2 20:5 and Race Sams. Philar. Pa. 19103 (21M 44810@ FRC Task No. Aldo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 3EVIEW OF EC'JIPMENT ITEM NO.1G .
'QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATICN: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMEN g Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 1A . Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately
- Qualified Life or Replacement Scheduler Established' (If Required) __)(
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __ Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) )< Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: l' o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately
' o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied
- Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied - -- Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satirfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified ' I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X. II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification __ III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available D e
x NRC Contract No. NRC479-118 A
' IIFranktn Research Center FRC Prefect No. C5257 Pago A Divubn of N Fw'un !nme FRC Assignrnent No.13 3a 25 and Race Str. ts. Phda.. Pa.191CH215) 49-1000 t RC Task No. 464 -
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1Sz. . w LICDISEE RESIONSE M NRC SER Qualified Qualification As sessment On-Going - X To be Replaced by a' Qualified Cccponent [1+1 -- NCTIS USED !N Ar7!SION 4 {33] NOTE 1_ Test speci= ens l'p hef erences 25 and 26 were ASCO .Vedel . .- No.'s 8300 364F and'83C3 361YY. _ 66 s scT3 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. D073 3 Equip =ent was tested successf ally to a higher radiation dose than that derives by engineering analysis. - m4 Insular *en qualification per References 44 or 47 as applieseler assess =ent engoing. NOTE 5 All metallic cc=ponents: not subject to thermal or radiatica degradation at the specified levels.
, 6_X Equip =ent will be replaced if quall'ication can et be i substantiated.
NOTE 7 Further equipment identificatien needed to assure applicability of test report. ECT3 8 The 510 OU Trip / calibration System is insensitive to pewssure changes a pressure qualificatien test is not censidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revisien A). _ O h. _ , 3 - _ _ , _ , . , ,_
A NRC Contract No. NRC-0349-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pago
!!dFranMin Research Center A Dwwn c.f The Franttin inetuie FRC Assignrnent No.13 5o-2Sh end Race Stres. Phifa Pa 19103 (215) 48-Koo FRC Tack No. 46;fo l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. % .
__ EQUIPMENT ENVIRO 124 ENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DCR Guidelines X _; NUREG-0588, Cat. I _; NUREG-0588, Cat. II _. DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS WITH SiCTICN REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR
- SU3MrITAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)_
(DOR /0588-I/0588-II) . . . So t.E.74 0 ) O ULV E. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION. Equipment Type ! h.v s. ' * ! _ ! Manufacturer's Name ! - Of W it NA M
! ! C oR.?ORKT'10 N !
( .2.2/-/-)
!WPt_B !
Model Number (5.2.2/-/-) !g3 cob 72F;!1C-5450 ! >< Serial Number !W Pt.S ! I gg 3
.!82co0GBF . !
Features / Mounting ! ! !
! ! 8/2 IN. V LTCN SEALS !
(5.2.6/-/-) ! ! I Connections / Interfaces INcTSTATE.D' ! ' I (5.2.6/-/-) -
!h res.Em!
W ! ! S F_E. Location / Elevation ! d l L ats:Ese A
! NOTE.k
!Ythe ! !
Equipment ID No.
. casa \e . .
QUALIFICATION REPORT ik.d#5O') i (8. 0/ 5. 0/ 5. 0)
! PED W ! !
Report ID Number
! '7 s-G2. ! PED ME.mo !
! ! Q g ,,. g 3,. !
Report Date , Issued by Prepared for ! ! g g 6EN ERA 1. E.ttcTa.it Co.: ! Referenced Reports Qualification Method ! (5.1, 5. 3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) ! ! ~
! ! TE.ST !
QUALIFICATION TEST PR% RAM
- Functional Test Description !
(5. 2. 5/2. 2. 9/2. 2. 9) ! ! MW. SHtFT PRESSURE) !!
! ! EA( AoE. CHEt.c L
Operating Conditions ! ! (-/2.2.10/2.2.10) ! Icad/ Cycles / Voltage / ! ! i O ro V O C. Current /Freq. ! ! ! 9 C g N Z. n #
r A NRC Contract No. NRC-C3-79-118 Paga bb Frank!:n Research Center FRC Prclect No. C5257
, A DMmn of The Franktn insetute FRC A I;;nment No.13 $h 20th and Rue Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 44 S l @ 0 FRC Task No. 4(olo
; EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Wo
~
DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATICN (X OR NOTE NO.') (DOR /0 588-I/0 588-II) SUBMI'I rAL DOCLMENTATION t Acceptance criteria ! ! ! (5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1) ! ! b CT'ONAL. !
!T E .sTI NG !
Accuracy (5. 2.5/-/-) ! ! ! 1 i . Ntcher of Specimens ! ! !
! I ~~
I Nov $7' ATE o ! Test Instruments Calibrated ! ! Safety Function (Active / !DPR N ! ! Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3) !N2.MaKyk ! ! bl ! !
! v a3e_dv Test Duratica (5.2.1/-/-) !cpe @e on !
Accident Duration (Envir. ! ! ! Above Normal) (5. 2.1/-/-) ! ,
"3 Required Function Time ! I hr. ! U 1 2 21 -
- 1 ! 1 Test Sequence (General) ! !
(5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)
! 1 RAD /oPER.[cBE dmuRE !
Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, ! !. -! Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-) !
- 1. Representative Sample ! ! f*
- 2. Baseline Data ! !
- 3. Performance Extremes ! !
- 4. Thermal A? ing ! ! ;
- 5. Radiation Aging ! ! *
- 6. Wear Aging
- 7. Vibration / Seismic ! ! f*
- 8. DBE Exposure ! !
- 9. Post-DBE Exposure ! ! !
- 10. Inspection ! ! !
Aging (5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) Thermal Aging / Basis . .
;NOT PERFo9.me_o ; )(
. Material Aging . .
! NOTE!
# Evaluation (7.0/-/-) ! ~ !
Materials Susceptible ! ! ! . (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) ! ! !
-' Radiation Agir;, Type ! ! t e
I 4 NRC Contract No. N RC-03 79-118 FRC Project No. CS257 Pago dIJ Franklin Rewarch Center A Dim 4n of N frenWo Inst:tute FRC AsslGarnent No.13 - $~C 20th and Race Streets. Pht!a. Pa. 19103 1225) 448 1000 FRC Task No. %b
,' EQUIPME:IT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. W -
. DEFICENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR t WITH SECTION REFERENCE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)_
(DOR /0588-I/0588-II) !
! !Tnc.luded tG !
! ar,c,tde.nk DOSE !
Radiaticn Aging, Dose (Id) ! [, ! Radiation Aging, Dose Rate ! !.
- 1. 1 !
Radiatica Aging, Method ! ! ! e Materials Susceptible I ! ! (Radiation) (5. 2. 4, 7. 0/-/-) ! ! ! Operational Aginq ! 12.00 C.ydes 1 (-/4.2/-) ! ! 1-Other Age Conditioning ! (-/4,2/-) ! !
~
Qualified Life Claimed / E'stablished (5.2.4/4.10/-) _ i 2. y r. ! NO {
~
+
Normal Ambient Temperature ! ! ! Normal Ambient Radiation ! Normal Ambient Humidity ! ! On-Going Surveillance and ! Preventive Maintenance ! ! (7.0/-/-) ! ! On-Going Analysis of ! Failures and Degradation ! !
%~ (7.0/-/-) ! !
Margin (Genera!) ! (6.0/3.0/3.0) ! ! l ! Margin (NUREG-0588, ,
. Cat. I) (-/3.2/-) 1 l 1. Temperature (+15'F) !
- 2. Pressure (+10%, ! ! !
10 psig max) !
- 3. Radiation ! !
(not required)
- 4. Time (+10%, +1 hour ! -
& function time minimum) .
e
--Q.- -
4 N FC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Froject No. C5257 Page
- LU0brank!'n Remrch Center A Dtven of The Fran'an las::tute FRC Assignment No.13 5d 20th .nd anc. Streets. Phaa,. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4G(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ik.
NRC REQUIF m iTS DEFICIENCY
- LICENSEE (X OR WITH SECTION REFERENCE QUALIFICATION (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUEMITTAL DOCUMOiTATION NOTE NO.)_
1 ACCIDDiT CONDITIONS 1 1
! -! - 1 IOCA/MSLB/EELB/ Uncontrolled ! ggg 1
(QQ 1 (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1,-4.3.3/ 1.1, 1. 2, 1. 5/1.1, 1. 2, 1.'5) ! ! !
. Radiation Type Game -- i Radiation Dose (rd) . . .
(4.1.2/1.4/1.4) *!
! 5. 0 x to' -J. !
Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr) 1 ! ! Radiation Q'2al. Method ! ! ! % (5.3.1/-/-) ! ! ! Proximity to Concentrated !. . ! ! Radiation ! ~. . y n._ _ ! 7
'!~
(4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6) ! ! . '! 1 1 1 Equipment Susceptible to ! ! ! Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) ! !. 1 Radiation Dose (Normal + 1 ! ~1 Accident) (4.1.2/-/-) ' Q xlO5 rd.! 3.0 x 107 rd, ! Plateout Dose Considered ! ! ! (-/1.48/1. 48) 1 ! !
! ! 1-Gan:ma + Beta Dose (rd) ! ! !
(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7) ! ! ! I e .- g m ww *.~9m a _
,t NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pago 4[NFur ktn Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 FRC Asdgnment No.13 A owan of TN rranian Institute Se 2% and R..ca Streeis. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 4GIo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.iG .
~
' DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIRE.MENTS WITH SECTICN REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR SUEMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)
(DOR /0588-T/0588-II) ! ENVIROtMENTAL PROFILE ! ! ! OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS ! ! ! Rate of Temp./ Press. NOT TT",%TED [' 4 Increase !. ! ! Peak: *F/psig/RH/ Time 3c5[9[-[.40se: 3 4 0[(,S[t co'[g g,y, .f. Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time $gs/of-fahn 340/46[icof3sa. i. Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time I"#! ~! 37O/4S/1oo /3 H2. k
!g ! !
Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Time ~2r50[zs[toO[DR. !
! I Equipment surf ace Tempera- !
ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, 7
- . 2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6) 72 !. ! .
! NCT PE.R.FO m E. D !
Spray Qualification Method ! NA ( 5. 3. 2/1. 3, 2. 2. 8/1. 3, ! ! ! t46 I 2.2.8) ! ! .' Spray Composition ! ! ! (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/ ! Nk ! !
- 1. 3, 2. 2. 8) ! ! !
^ *! Spray Density (gpm/f t2) : NA ! 1 Spray Duration , * ' Submergence Duration ! !- ,
( 4.1. 3/2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5) __ In-Leakage Considered ! ! ! ( 5. 2. 6, 5. 3. 2/-/-) ! ! !
,1 1 1 !
'I Time to Submergence !
~
8 Dust Environment ! - ! ! (-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) . 2
.~
s% NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 Page l.dEFranklin Research Center FRC Prclect No. C5257 A Dimn of The Franan Insnruie FRC Ass!gnment No.13 5f 20th and Race Sneets. Pbf.a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448.We FRC Task No. 4fofo EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. %
~
NOTES:
- 1. Nio 4-ke rma) a.aina or chemra.l serav w as pe.r-fot-med E ./ '
J .J foi- %e. +e sE ornoJt-am. L A L %~m nc. 2.4 k an n Aw ala. nnnc.,-aA nn 4 r% d
- MUS c_m_o. b h -% A.ro A q s s
.. e A. :
n_o r
~
/Z.0 PECCkfV W A CM l o S.Jfe.af
'3 cSo M a d' AffW egna
; - ;x
?,
&}sa .);bs t & .wro 6 5 . e w i S !b h $ s f{e f h e b.o "S
- r o ll ,.: J
. a -,a i apha ide e.a4 -
mia
, ?dox-:rd)af age gmT muis~ pp' pkn:/.*
e)cd/.:Gs ih Ok h m2&A L 4- & O ,'e c e na_ L ~ e_as.'. a a. n. O m m . n o' n a D 11L Jm T '% b % JlrrtctuB-_ ow -1L> O*, N
&lJs .Aq u , a 4,<d
% t c m .n i on L 0 c. MA -4 excmilvD dm M.'b2 4.
- 3. ~~N 1552 .:m- M M e M cm
% M M, mxr-
\ k& W %Os W o5%aw u N-% M A D /kekD e awn 7-Lc ham a nMaALO. : . (m<r42a st ena . W9ts 8300 6725 wPLS 8sco %8 F
~
4' p l a_n b 1. D. M. sv 201.1-32. Sv e 8 ~ diC. -08 C , - 10 C. SV 201.2.- 0 3 l
, D,. :- NRC Ccntract No. N RC-03-73-118 Paga C3 F<anklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dius.cn of The namn N::ute FRC Assignment No.13 lc Eth and Rece Streets FMa.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. H4 ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D._.
?-
] EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 17 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE EMERGENCY CONDENSER RETURN VALVE AREA
]"
ASCO MODEL 8300 SERIES REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 EOUR TER CEECKSHEET NO.17 ' LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1552, 4025.
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): EMERGENCY' CONDENSER VALVE PILOT (SV 39-06, SV 39-05)
'I LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): B-H,{ 33 ]
?xnse 4
s
.. 3
- P 4
DESIGNATICN FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: _ (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, Qr, Rr, P, E, CS, S, (R) , M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: ' Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 i Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Ob, 30, 3d=
, f.j 40, !b, tc, id, te, d'
.N System Consideration Review -
! Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -5 0 , 5b, 50, Ed Se, 5f, 2 S$7-Shr 4W Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation <;, 55_ _
~
Equipment Sumary
- Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary t, 7L, 7c 9
en. . . , ,n,. gy 1 a - w 9 . - - -
r NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118
' 4,3u~^ranki:n Research Center IE F FRC Project No. C5257 Pa03 A Divis.on of The Frar:itin inst:rure FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th ard Rue Strecs. FMa . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 4/MO ,
EQUlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M i SDMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY ' CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/hme-wst) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ~ environmental service conditions. 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
; outstanding qualificatian deficiencies.
X The Licensee (ha s/' - - - ^ t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacecent with~ qualified equipment Equipment modification ~ti + - ~ ? Equipment relocation above, submergence level Relocate or shield equipment frca radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . , Qualification testing of equipment in progress X Other ( dePfacerc<M. i4 cud.Carb f\04 be subduhtN . )
~%
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
; that can be construed as a basis for jettification for interim operation.
X The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the ' proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
- ~
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency i
@ Modification III.a Exempt -
g g Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.D Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available .
--e- - m.
-5 __
h, NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 I Page O!!!I Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 A Divmon of The Franktn Ir mue FRC Aesignment No.13 2
; 2th and Rece Strevis. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC. Task No. 4fo4 .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICNTION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M , b 4
- I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMARY FORM DESIGNATION:
NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Eviden;e of Qualification Adequate , Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Tetst Specimen. Established. X
.. Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately; )(
) Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X
. Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation --
X Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) X
- Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate - o Duration Adequat.e i o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied 1 Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied X , Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
'-; DESIGNATION:
1,4 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY 9 I.a Equipment Qualified -
. '. .j I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established
. II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipme'nt Satisfies A1) Requirements Except Qualified Life 5
or Replacement Schedule Justified
'. . ( III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
, IV Documentation Not Made Available 3
- s. -
u-gwg - msz.
- ,e O
4 1- :
As NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 d
' W Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A CMsan d The TvackDn insma. FRC Assignment No.13 3o Sh and Rae Streers. Ph:!a.. Pa. 191031215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 foto EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION R5 VIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M
~
LI N SEE RESPCNSE TO NRC SER M Qualified Qualification Assessment On-Coing
- M To be Replaced by a Qualified Ccmponent b$
NC"ES CSID IN Rr/ISICN 4 {33] Wo:31 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Medel No.'s 8300 364F and 33C0 361YT. d' "I scT3 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. ECT3 3 - Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than teat derived by engineering analysis. . HOT 3 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicabler assessment ongoing. m5 All metallic ce=ponentst not subject to thermal or
. radiation degradation at the specified levels.
NoT3 6_ Equ'i p=en t will be replaced if qualification canno be s substantiated. ECT3 7 Further equipment identification needed to assure applicability of test report. NOTE 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to pressure changes a pressure qualificacica test is not censidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revisicn A). b e 9
.i'
- } A NRC Confraet No. NRC43-70-118
$C F-ank!!n Recarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A omwe, of The r,anktn hsuuie. FRC Acsignment No.13 5f 20:h and Race Shws. PMa., Pa 19103 (215) 448- tcoo FRC Task No. 4 frb 1
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I7 a
.M, 4
..j NOTES:
h,_,x 40Z.5 A n_ m m me,+ s Mnnm m m Onctme*mo wuurd mo c. i o03 . T.L.b i t m W o c_ m I A % 4 e9 tot A oMeh - o - 4o - 31O
- F , t, s psi, . M% G "L. ._Ortru.c_ M e.Ah m .
TL- u ,M _ h&2 - i a T -
. A mta am % - Asco ao A 8300
( o- M WPHT 8300 BCM F . O.4 $ a mmh 20 -14 n4 . Mio het MM S1GnDo am .bd . uAl s.h_% . c1 ' ' Q '. 3:us/mn _ TA o e . mnm e a A ,,-~ck - m o w /- P t M Icte M- av n_u A >Qv aCLa't
% o e&a 4
3 s-. t e eA x e C__t- T E R_e d M .D P h m, ' T h* 5 - i
, -% o i
i c v c
- U s'* B 9 s :
'.}.
, The abc-re simulated I.CK.A tests exceeded the ce=bined time, e issure and te.perature exposure expected in the contain.ent hres.
. resed en the excess test conditiens and the perfo mance of the '
? .- . .
j equi =ent during test it is safe to.say the Asco Solenoids
, !*Oll X3320A21V, Serial 1:o. 96573A, U?llTc300tslYT, Serial No. 9G577A,
'a co Limit Switch f A-740-500-00 and M:sencilan riodel 877-4 Airset siki .c en ti'nue to perfern during and after a Less of Cperating Coelaat tecid e n t.
t "a
,s. NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-79-118 DOI. Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A cim.cn of The r:ank!in :: s:rure FRC Assignment No.13 20:h and Race Streets. Phi a.. Pa lHU3 (215) 44d 1000 lc FRC Task No. 'lb k EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T EQUIFMENT ITEM NO. 18 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING
. ASCO MODEL WPLB8300B68F REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 18
- LICE"SEE REFERENCE (S): 1552, 24 FUNC AION (PLANT ID): TORUS VACUUM RELIEF VALVE OPERATOR (SV 68-09C, -08C,
-10C) .
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): E-15 [33] I DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY (See Secuon 3 of this TER for Legend) R,'T, QT, RT, P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
, Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, O , 2d Sy's tem Consideration Review h. th, !, , !;, if- - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review %, 5b, :o, %, k, : f,
-53, !', 51 Rj- -
Installed IMI Lessons Learned Implementation 30, !b , Equipment Summary Maintenancc. ana Replacement Sche ' ale Summary h , 7h, 7c-
,-c-,n '
NRC Contract No. NRC-03@3-118 4'JM FnnkLn Resc rch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A D ns.un of Re fura tes:ue FRC Acsignrnen' No.13 lb Sth and Rue En eds. FN's.. Pa ;U031215) 444.W.J FRC Task No. Wo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL' QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.9
, SU28.ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES ';O THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
1 Tne Licensee (has,%s es44 provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE
- environmental service conditions.
i N The Licensee has presented infor=ation which shows there_4Lre no cutstanding qualification deficiencies, d The Licensee (has/hs=wt) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by.the Licensee for tnis equipment item. 1 Corrective-action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress X Other (9ephenh4 9oaj. c.a.m. ^oi- % C.o I:=ka.nb ind. ) N The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 1 The Licensee fu==./has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW j - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
! I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency h Modification III.a Exempt -
{a, Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available . 4
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Page ddFrankEn Resmch Center FRC Project No. C5;g A o%n of The Fraranincrute FRC Assignrnont No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phtta.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-two FRC Task No. 4Mo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI .MTION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUDL24ENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Ngradation Evaluated Mequately X Qualified Life or Replacecent Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation > 4 Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) }f X i Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: , S o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence _Sacisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied -
._ '~ i2 Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies. .
(If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Cliteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0388, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
- T
- II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established ' _ _ _
II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Deempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
~
S.=_..sw h mo.% g ertmao.md)..m h ,
NRC Ccntra ct No. H RCA:-T&-118 nklin Rewarth Center FRC Prcje<:t No. C5257 Page A eva.on d Th. runken n uwe FRC Asrignment No.13 30 Mth and Race Shecs. PhJ.s. Pa. 19103 (215) 4 S-1000 FRC Task No. Nb EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICA JN REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.18 i t LICDhSEE RESPCNSE m NRC SER I i Qualified Qualification Assessment On-Coing.' X T6 be Replaced by a Qualified Ca=ponent y i NCE S USED IN Ar/ISICN 4 {33 4 - NOTS 1_ - Test specimens in 7.sferences 23 and 26 were ASCO . Medal - 1 No.'s 8300 364F and 83c3 361YT. NCE 2 Qualification assess =ent ongoing. nots 3 Equip =ent was tested successfully to a higher radiatica . dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOT2 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as . applicabler assess =ent ongoing. ,
.; BOTE 5 All metallic cc=ponentst not subject to thermal or . _ . . ...--
. radiatica degradation at the specified levels. .
. -4 I NOf3 6_ N ' Equip =ent will be replaced if qualification cannot 'ee i
substantiated. I NOTE 7 f; ; rurther equip =ent identification needed to assure applicability of test report.
-t i
8073 8 The 510 CU Trip / calibration system is insensitive to i pressure changest a pressura qualification test is not q considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revisica A). _
- 1 1
i I l M
* ^
r 4 NRC Centract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page i.05 Frank:in Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dw.wn cf In rinnan Insmute . FRC Assignment No.13 [q 20th and Race Sheeis Phita.. Pa 19103 (215) 440!mo FRC Task No. 4O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I9
~
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 19 TRIP UNIT LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING ROSEMOUNT MODEL 510DU REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 19 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 22 i PUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRYWELL PRESSURE TRIP TO RPS (201.2-476A, B, C, D) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): H-21 THROUGH H-24 [33]
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): EMERGENCY CONDENSER FLOW TRIP TO RPS (36-06A, B, C, D)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): H-25 THROUGH H-28 [33] FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM LINE FICW TRIP TO RFS (01-26A THROUGH H) LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): H-29 TEROUGH H-36 [33]
.i -
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED tsY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) h T, h RT, P, H, CS S, (R), M, I, h RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable u i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
. Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la A Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Sb, ? c , 2 5 -- System Consideration Review 4. Ah, ic, id, te, P _
, Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, Sb, 50, !d , ~ c , 6f Sg, Sh, Si, Sj g c 5 -
Sm. % > 50, SV Sb,
. I.istalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation A 4 Se Equipment Summary if,35'b,'f g ,3Sc,3 },
Sh.3Td,,si Tjy % )50,y Tm, Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Su=:u ry % '" 4 To i 3 To.) SPe)j 4 .
; NRC Contract No. NRC-03-70-118 :
.g[ Frank!;n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Paga ,
A Ch4,on of The Franktn Imr.nas FRC Assignmeni No.13 lb
. xtvand Rxe streets. Phita.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. FN EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQU# MENT ITEM NO. /9 .
SUMMARY
OF LICE.iSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
}
I Tne Licensee (has/h wet-at) provided a response to the SER concerns. [ The Licensee (has/hx mt) specifically stated that the equipment is , qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
. l The Licensee has presented information which shows thero are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim cperation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. A corrective action specified by the Licensee Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source - Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment - Qualification testing of equipment in progress , Other ( _ ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.
- f!
The Licensee (has/has rot) provided.a schedule for the prohsed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
.c ,
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, a and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
-
- DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY LASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ,
5 I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
- I.b Modification III.a Exempt
/II.aQualificat.lonNotEstablished} III.b Not in Scope II.D Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ,
e
J o'dhrank!!n Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project No. Cf257 PaQe A D%n of The Frankun ins-Ate FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Setwes. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810n0 FRC Task No. W6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS ,
- Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity BetVeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established .
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Y Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) )( Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Requiie~d)' Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate X o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate X Criteri'a Regarding Spray Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied. . .. .. X Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied - ___ ? Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies ,
, (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied ~
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
.9 DESIGNATION:
X = CATEGORY
. NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified * ? I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification hot Established 1 II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life d or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Dcempt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 9 O e
9 e
'l A HRC Ccntract No. NRCC-4118 LUUU Frank!!n Rasauch Canter FBC Pre!cct No. C"257 Paco A cwu cf m Freun t,=wre FRC Assignment No.13 3g M and he Strw Phde.. Pa.19103 c1!J 448-8000 - FRCTAsk No. 9dd l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /f
- 4
) LIdSEE RESICNSE 'it NRC SER _1 4talified . Qualificacien.$sessmentOn-fhing; To be Replaced by a Q1alified Ccaponent -- e
~
l r .
.~
_; ~ i
.uI s
O e e 6 y G 9 e
N AC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 A'jlIrrenklin Research Center FAC Project No. C5257 Page
.'! L A e e.,n os nl. rr.en Insuur FRC'A seisnmant No.13 5 p 8.nds. ,si....t Phita. P4 191'tJ (285) 448 it*K1 FRQTask No, d.h EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I T- .,
..l
-Checksheets Slou Sa S.%r,,4haveI been removed aue to the
- v. v -
W l propriatary nature of informatiorr contained thereim T g_ me S' 6" y -- 4 ... . . , 1
.t
.1
'. ; j o
,=
4 % ,
,. t
.g..*,
6 q -
*&6 p e
, . . . ~
s NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118
. !$.". Franklin Rese arch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Dvs.cn of The Fne'a !.n festate FRC Assignrnent No.13 l a-20:h nd rtue ser,,ts. twa.. P. 1910142:5144d Im
- FRC Task No. _LI:Jfb ..
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW CF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 20 1 j EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 20 TRIP UNIT LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING ROSEMOUNT MODEL'510DU REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECRSHEET NO. 20
- LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 22 l
FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REACTOR LEVEL TRIP UNIT (36-03A, C, D; 36-04A, B, C, D; 36-05A, B, C,, D)
- LICENSEE SUBMIITAL: SCEW(S): G-17 TEROUGH 28; G-36 TEROUCH C-40 [33]
, FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REACTOR PRESSURE TRIP UNIT PRESSURE TRIP
( 3 6-0 7A, B , C, D ; 36-08A, B , C , D) __ LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCE*4(S) : 'J-28 TEROUGH G-36; C-40 TERCUGH C-48 [33]
*? 3 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:
(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, h RT, P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, 4 Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: .
- Contents Checksheet Page No.
I Equipment Item la j
, Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 8
Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, ?c, 3d-System Consideration Review c, 05, 0;, Od, :, ?! - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 42, 5b, !;, If, 5:, Sf, 55 , Ch, Ji, :j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 44, O t, Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, b , '
Audfrank!;n Research Center NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-79-118 Page FRC Prcject No. C5257 A D:en d N &anMn fr sene 13 lb
~hh ar d Ru e Stavis. PMa . Fa 19103 (215) 448 INO FRCTask FRC Assignment No. No.
#/ N _, ,,
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M _ ~ SCAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE,:. I Tne Licensee (has/hac r. t) provided a response to the SER concerns. Y The Licensee (has/ha: .~t) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service ccnditions. M The Licensee has presented' information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (hcs/has 'not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for 'nteria operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment . Equipment modification. - Equipment relocation above submergence level - Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environmont . Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (has/ bas not) provided a sched .le 'or the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environ:nental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for I.egend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b mdification III.a Exempt - (II.a Qualification Not Established] III.b Not in Scope II.D Not Qualified IV Ibcumentation Not Available ,
.; 4 NRC Confraet No. NRC-03 73-118 j MFranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pags
. A c;ve on of The r,awin Insmie FRC Aesignment No.13 2 Dh arid Race 5tm s. Ph.:4.. Pa.191C3 (215) 4481000 FAC Taek No. $
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _d? . i I
; EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAt. QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORh DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X
. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) __X l Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation --
Criteria Agarding Aging ci,aulation Satist.ed (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate . X o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Stea:a Exposure (If Required) Adequate X Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied X i Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteri+, Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied _ _ Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
. .e, DESIGNA*rION:
+-
NRC QUALIFICATION C.*TEGORY, X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified .
. I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life ~
or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review , ; IV. Documentation Not Made Available
* , 6
, . K
,/ m o4 M .
4 e - e *we
~
--e,
& NRC Ccntract No. NRC-CS-79-898
'i!bu J Fran;d!n Research Center FRC Frelect No. C5257 Face A Civen of The Fr ne.ninerure FRC Assicnment No.13
- oih .nd ax. ser is. Pha .. P. 191c3 (2:514r.s.I000 3a-FAC Taek No. 4'44 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. So LICENSEE RESICNSE M NRC SER d Qualified
~
Qualification As sessment On-Going , To be Replaced by a @alified C:cponent _ i E e b 9 e
~
sup O I r- r- _' - . - - J'
I j Q NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118
- .d Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5."57 Pago A c:m.cn of m Franun immuw FRC Assignment No.13 lo i
Ith and L Sunu. Na . Pa 1910U215) 4431mo' FRC Task No. N , . EQUt? MENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _2L EQUIn1ENT ITEM NO. 21 TRANSDUCER, E/P LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING FISHER CONTROLS MODEL 546 4154882 REQUIRED OPERATING TDfE: 28 HOURS TER CHECKSEEET No. 21 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 4719, 29 ,
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATES TEMPERATURE CONTROL VALVE (E/P 70-137) .
LICENSEE SUEMITTAL: SCEW(S): J-4 [33] c i i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY3 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
. . Not stated, Not applicable i .
LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: ,
. . Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Su:xnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, h M System Consideration Review '* * .., .., m, n
, Fquipment Enviconmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, Sg , Sh, 51, 44-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation k, cb Equipment surxnary '
Maintename anc Replacement Schedule Summary 78r '" .
- w. , _ , , , n - ,, w
4- N RC Contract fJo. NRC-03-73-118 dJ IFrank!!n Research Center FRC Project No.C5257 Page A D6mion of The Franktn Instm FRC Assignrnent No.13 lb Sh and Race Streets. Phda.. Pe 19103 (215) 445-tmo FRC Task No. h6 . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENT'AL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.E SUia%RY OF LICEN4EE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - CNLY -CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/h: cwt) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~
~
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
, outstanding qualification deficiencies.
_X,The Licensee (has/'" -t) propeced a corrective action for this eqt.ipment ites whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (has/" rt) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment itam. _,X, Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
~
Equipment replacement with qualified equipnent - Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualificatica by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment .- Qualification testing of equipment in progress _x ,Other (REPL At-smsar /F* CU4 L. (*ANAre y tsp gutsfray7/a ygD ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be censtrued as a basis for justification for interim
; operation.
_X, The Licensee Shaa/has not) provided a schedule' for the ' proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective j action .) ) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification ard/or should oe exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIMF (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification . III.a Exempt - II.a' Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available , 1
- _ - - ~ - . _ ._-. -- _ .-- . - - .
NRC Contrac8 Mo. NRC-03 73198 i nkhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page ! A Dumon of The Frankt:n rnezu . e FRC Ac-L;nment No.13 2'
.'th and Race Semes. FN!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 lor 8 FRC Task No. 466 .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4/ , s
~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM { DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY
' Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate ,
-
- Adequate Similarity- Betw'een Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging r regradation Evaluated Adequately y .
].
Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
- Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation --
4 Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate j o Peak Pressure Adequate , o Duration Adequate o Required-Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate _,_ _ Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied __ Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied _ , , , , , , Criteria Regarding Radiation , Satisfied ,,g,__
. Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied , _,
Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied' Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
'i*- Criteria-Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Te.st Duration Margin '(1, hour + Function Time) Satisfied -
9 , Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
- 1 DESIGNATION:
~\
.. . e .
,NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY- X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified -
~. i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established
.j II.c Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
-j III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification
', r;f III.a Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
,j IV Documentation Not Made Available i .
l l
4 NRC Contrac2 No. NBC-CNO-118 , D.") Franun Rmmch Ce.tcr FRC Project No. C5257 MCO A ci-n case nae tecree FRC Aedynment No.13 3a 20th and Race Stnein. FMa.. Pa 1910S G1H 448-1000 FRC Task No. AG6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. EL. b LICEIS7.E RESPCNSE T NRC SER
'l _ @alified C4)-
Qualification Assessment On-Coing
- To be Replaced by a @alified Cc=ponent Rev. Oate: .cett 7, '992 4 tee wile Point Lnit 1 Cc-crent Review $aary Deet huis-ent: El*ctr::neu stic Tra.stucer (E/P 7C.137)
Manufact.rer: Fisher uc cel: Ty;3 546 Safety function: 2eact:r 3u11cing cle'ed 1c00 c:olirg (ESCLC) te-: erat 6re control cualification Ciscresancy: L.cx of coce ented cualification concerning tire /te.:erature aging Justification for Continued C;erasten: ne vlectrecneastic transducer centrols *oculating valves for reacts'r closed IcoD C oling systes *etcarature C39 trol. De Dosttien of three valves, 28CLC heat en 3 anger tysass. ABCLC heat esc 3 anger inlet and t3e service =ater meat enc 3arger outlet valves are controlled tsreugn the transtucer to aintain set t enc era t ure. Less of electrical signal el11 cause the ABCLC heat esct.arger tysass valve to its maximum ecening; ABCLC heat entsange- intet valve closed ano the service water heat escrarger cutiet valve to its sin. f10 c r.31 tion. L ss of motive air causes t3e ABCLC valves to fail as is and the service ater salve f ails 'u11 =cen. Wita less of centrol atr tre valves revert to full cooling ;csition. De reacter building cissed loco cooling system is in c:ntiwal :ceraticn curing ncmal ;:=er ::erating c:ncitions. Any age related failure associated . .ith the electr:cnewtatic trarsescer would te a=:arent to the ::eratcr as a result cf r.umerous tem erature alar'es. Sased en the at:ve. continued e=eratten is justified until the electreeneu-atte transeucer ts :u.Ilf teo cr rest aced .ita a cualtfied :evice. ee m 6
,i -
.' f
~
4 NRC Ccntreet No. NRC-02 73-118 l!dillf Frankun Research Center FRC Project No.C5:57 Faw, A Chee.on elTh Freaidan tnertwie - FRC Assignmant No.13 3h
.% and Race Smuts. FMe.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448- tmo FRC Task No. %fo
, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMEN TAL QUAUF1 CAT 10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21_
LICENSEE RESPONSE 'It NRC SER (Continued)
'i
,j No !S USED IN RIV 5fCN 4 {3] ,
1 _. j NOT3 1 Test specimens in References 23 and 26 wre ASCC Model No.'s 8300 364F and 83C3 361YF. NOTE 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. ncTs 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived' by engineering analysis. , NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per 2eferences 46 or 47 as applicables assessment ongoing. 5072 5 All metallic cc=ponents: not subject to thermal or radiation degradation.at the specified levels. Ntrr3 6 X Equip =ent wili be replaced if qualification cannot be
, substantiated. .
.. BCrrs 7 Further equip =ent identification needed to assure applicability of test report.
NOTE 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to j pressure changes a pressure qualificatica test Ls not considered necessary (F.MT-Rpt 12770, Revisicn A). , G
*7 _
.e.
4 e e 9 5
s An NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page Bbran'en Rewarch Center A Cw.on of The Franklin insmuta FRC Assignment No.13 So 5:5 and Race $rreets. Phifa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4r:8 1000 FRC Task No. #fG EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 84. 4 i
.?
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTE QUEIFICATION REVIEW Crit tria: DOR Guidelines ,)(_; NUREG-0588, Cat. I _; NUREG-0588, Cat. II . DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUAI.IFICATION (X OR SUBMI'I'rE DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) . (DOR /0588-I/0588-II)
. I 1 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Equipaent Type !f/P 7A'4N1DvC ! Et.4er/po.Arpc/ma r/c !
! AM. ! 7"AA N2 a uc AA l Manufacturer's Name !pigggy cog _ ! p,y,p ,,,g, !
(5.2.2/-/-) frAa4s Model Number (5.2.2/-/-) !gy4.p/pggy.!, 77pg gg. geog 4 ffyggf, . Serial Na:cber ifor frsrsp ! fa r .tr4rco ! Features / Mounting 1/or .frdrED ! yokd- Moukrswx:F 8Kr~ ! (5.2.6/-/-) , _
! #87~ MI'## ! ## 7' #
Connections / Interfaces (5.2.6/-/-) ! !
!AE.4er"BL DG.! !
Location / Elevation - Equipment ID No. ! #fp 7a fy 7 ! _ QUALIFICATION REPORT (8.0/ 5.0/5. 0)
') Report ID Numbee !ATA*278 1/fC/-//ff.oa/ (joyf f,9) ! ,g 7-s f
!PGA H7/1 ! t.tfit/t/ !
Report Date ! ' yy3 (,pp, p g AO
- Issued by 1 1 14 .2 3 (PGA +7/9) I* tVe7~4 L Prepared for
' gjypf Referenced Reports f f h 1 ! !
! ! 7'E S7' d 4 N A t.7.ftS !
2'N Qualification Method !
~ '
(5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) ! ! J', I* QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM Functional Test Description ! ! ppggg 77,gg g 7yy7.t I MC 3'E d' (5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) ! operating conditions ! !- 1
- # 0 !
(-/2.2.10/2.2.10) ! ! Icad/ Cycles / Voltage / ! ! ! Current /Freq. ! ! ! , a
4 NRC Contract No. NRC43-73-118 IErank!'n Remich Center FPC Project No. C5257 Pago A c us.o ,a m r an'.r ,t e m FRC Accignment No.13 5 h.
.% and Race St.ets. Ptu'a.. Pa 19103 CIS) 448-loE FRO Task No. V66 .
ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2/ NRC REQUIPS.MENTS DEFICIENCY
; WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE h0.)
Acceptance Criteria ! ! g,g j g _ ( 5. 2. 5/ 2. 2.1/ 2. 2.1) .
, 4 /NHA Al 7"y &.L */ 72-A g
. g ,
Accuracy (5l2.5/-/-). ! ! N/N 4 '9###O A M4dA!!
; !. ! / 7~/' !
}' Number of Specimens- !* !i ~~
Test Instruments Calibrated ! ! #d 7" J /~47~40 !
. Safety Function (Activc/ !ACT/VS ! __ _
Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3) , gg Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) 1 - !/3HAS ~'S7'fAM EW !
*2r D4yr Ayny.
- Accident Duration (Envir. !
Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-) ! ~ f.gj/ougg !! ~
- 1 1 1
- Required Function Time ! J C //Ov#S! /J //dvd8 ! .
. Test Sequence (General) ! - ! com/3 fugo yyp/// !
(5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1) ! ! ! ,
! ! D
~
Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, ! ! ! i Cat. I) (~/ 2. 3.1/-) ! ! !
- l. Representative Sample ! ! ! ;
{
- 2. Baseline Data ! ! !
- 3. Performance Extremes ! ! !
f ! !
- 4. Thermal Aging !
1 5. Radiation Aging ! ! ' !
~
- 6. Wear Aging ! ! !
q 7. Vibration / Seismic ! ! !
- 8. DBE Expcsure ! ! !
- i 9. Post-DBE Exposure ! ! !
4
- 10. Inspection ! ! !
; Aging ! ! !
(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) ! ! !
! Thermal Aging / Basis ! ! /AA//EN/vf Ma DE/. sh
'l ! ! !
Material Aging 1 1 !
/ '# ~
4
!<V87~ M# ##'*M#O Evaluation (7.0/-/-) ! !
Materials Susceptible k k /3vNA '# d- A /NGI d k - (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) ! !.BM/*446M L Radiation Aging, Type ! ! #a r J 7s r40 .
N RC Contract No. N RC-03-75-118 Page . . 6@N' ranktn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A owen or m Frankrin Inw:ur. FRC AsslC nment No.13 $C Sh a+3 Race Shuts. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (2!5) 449-1000 FRC Task No. -85 4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2/ M DEFICIENCY NRC F54UIREMENTS i WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICD1SEE QUALIFICATION (X OR SUEMITrAL DOCL' MENTATION NOTE NO. )_ (DOR /0588-I/0 588-II) Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) ' /,*/ 5 0 6 ! /, </ E O G , ! #ars Jj X e 3 Radiation Aging, Dose Rate ! de7~ .trATJD ! #c/~.1rArED ! Radiaticn Aginga Metbod
- 4M4/.yf/f stW4 f.y.c/!l7~st/~ 'ys yn .l, L Materials Susceptible ! !
(Radiation) (5.2. 4, 7.0/-/-) ! ! 8vN4 'N ' ! Operattoral Aging ! !.2.$~a a a cyc/es Aia ASDtys! Wor'd 2
! !4rJ2o ap !
(-/4.2/-) . . Other Age Conditioning ! 1 7 s,.rp. cyc 4.j,y a ; j.7,,,cfi
- y, u 2
(~/4.2/-)
- iifa*pf,sge*p p yoap .
Qualified Life' Claimed /. ! /2. S yes. ! /2.5 y,eg - -
!#o r-E f j X Established (5.2.4/4.10/-) ! ! .
1, ! ! Normal Ambient Temperature ! ! ! Normal Ambient Radiation ! /er STATED ! Normal Ambient Humidity !5 ! ! On--Going Surveillance and !#se frArED ! ! Preventive Maintenance (7.0/-/-) !
; On-Going Analysis of -
Failures and Degradation ! ! ! (7.0/-/-) .
'.- 1 1 . s Margin (General) ! ! !
(6.0/3.0/3.0) 1 Margin (NUREG-0588, ! ! ! b, Cat. I) (-/3. 2/-) ! !
- 1. Temperature (+15'F) ! ! !
l ! !
. '; 2.' Pressure (+10%, !
10 psig max) ! ! ! ~ i
; 3. Radiation (not required) 1 1 !
~
i
- 4. Time (+10%, +1 hour ! ! !
f ! ! !
+ function time minimum) ?* .
i e 9
f
; - NRC Contract No. NRC-03-72-118 Pags
- D[.[J Frank'in Research Center FRC Frclect No. C5257
~
A oimron ei n. Fraran inetui. FRC Assignment No.13 5d
.Th e-J Race Streets. Phfa.. Fa.19103 C15) 443.In FRC Task No 46C EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICN REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. di.
- i a
I DEFICIENCY , NRC REQUIREMENTS WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/O 588-II) SUBMITTAL _ DCCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) ACCIDENT CONDITIONS _ ! ! !
- IDCA/MSL3/HEL3/ Uncontrolled !//g/.6 ! NSi, dj// O C 4 1 .
(4.1, 4. 2, 4 ; 3.1, 4. 3. 3/ ! ! ! 1.1. 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5)' !. 1: 1 4 ! ! ! d 3 l5adiaticaType ! Wor stdrSD! He7~ 17:4 780 ~~ ! 1 ! ! Radiation Dose (rd) ! ' SEE MfM/4 MON A6M6 (4.1. 2/1. 4/1. 4) ! p.SEdf . ! Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr') !#dT.rrgEO ! - Radiation Q'u al. Method ! J agt.yf/J ! esf4444'/HI ! (5.3.1/-/-) ! Proximity to Concentrated !gs r .fr4rFO ! !- Radiation . ! ! !
~ (4.-l. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6) ,
Equipment Susceptible to ! ! ! Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) ! ! ! Radiation Dose (Normal + 1 ! ! ^ f ! !
; Accident) (4.1. 2/-/-) !
'I 1 1 1 Plateout Dose Considered ! ! !
(-/1. 48/1. 4 8) 4 ! ! ! 1
i Gamma + Seta Dose (rd) 1 1
, ( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 7/1. 4. 7)
A 4
-1 G
-t
n N RC Ccntre:t No. NRC43-79-118
$f Frank!:n Rescarch Center D,0J FRC Projeci No. C5257 Page A D+,s.cn of Th. riarun insneui. FRC Assignment No.13 5e 20:h and Race Streets. Phi'a . Pa. 19103 (211) 448 loro FRC Took No. 144 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 l -
NRC REQUIREMEN'IS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0 588-II) , SU3MITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.) E!NIRO! MENTAL PROFILE ! ! !
. OF ACCIDENT CCNDITIONS ! ! !
Rate of Temp./ Press. ! Md/~J74/2iO! Md T #7'M80 ! Increase ! ! !
! & 4
~
Peak: 'F/psig/RH/ Time L7Mj/.l.vjba//pg ' dv/75 j J/fgo/,f //p
. s . .
Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time 'Ne/topeo//fD JN[f/.1[/ar//2 //,4 ' cecrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ! ! ! Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ! ! ! Equipment Surf ace Tempera-- ! ! ! ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, ! - 2.2.5/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6) ! ! ! Spray Qualification Method ! N/A ! ! (5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, ! ! ' 2.2.8) ! ! ! Spray composition ! ! - ! (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/ ! ! !
. 1.3, 2.2.8) ! ! !
i Spray Density (gpm/f t 2) ! ! !
-1 Spray Duration ! ! ! -
. ~l Submergence Duration ! ! !
( 4.1. 3/ 2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5) ! ! !
. 1 ! !
In-Leakage Considered ! ! !
. (5.2. 6, 5. 3. 2/-/-) ! 1- !
- r ! !- !
? fj Time to Submergence ! ! !
-r ! ! !
j Dust Environment ! ! ! - (-/2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) ! - w e e S S
4 NRC Contraet No. 4RC-03-T3118 p20 UCf Frank!in Re<earch Center FRC Freject No. C5257 A o.. wn of The Franan Est tui. FRC M signment No.13 5i Nth and Rue Swen. PS.ra.. Pa.19103 C15) 448-1000 FRC Task No. -26G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.,1d. e O j NOTES:
/.) ATP s2 9 c .->,rr ib s,i' an evoli !M_ys ) /$ A~ As Co,4-eA / ne- - P G *A e d-s-
,m,-u ,a A+ /s.sendw >> <
/r- sA' n ma/ u.+ a ea.4 n/h_ an d ~am Am 4, - -
. j vi
- d les, e A nn ~,- A nm r.n / t'loe.1 oe He //). AGA //47/ 9 /'/*ido, ?,,,4-s A i-*nce/
w.n i.Ls wa/>iu a.-44./an,,,, /A r.' A -s. ,- fra om _
/
~
i
; yJq
* $ * /*6 b 'A .
-$ *, * .L.- A A $rtt Ce/7f/ *
- rr l .'t bbsa os
- 1= -4 r* ** b de=
; ./_wnai M /A. eA, A/ A v A L Ad esm -
Y r,, ,- madaaA w e A_ No oir,s, A - e/ A /A /r-a n /u e->x. A'- e3 s../J n /A m2 ln's 8- e~n .,,ne,th 4 < j v .i / A A~snr./ne>> s Arp #2 9 r/>A /A A AGa,e -
*4 u s r a/ a.t a irt.< r m.ac. ,, art.ael x : w. , r=
& d Wet %heCS Yta'Co* T** 4l* s'!*9 ***s.{rveTL tr< aja rNc ,
St;4Jtr:~.J~ 7'2mDL.cet'. et/# w w < i;Erl 7~-c.C C
; N0'*tJ
- M '!"'*<! C t'*cAvs sm!*MC sssM A*m A) 73 15o a M t ua'on h .
f I Croit,J doc.,4. m & 3 % i: ens,*</J #,5) , s4 4o re n r~4 e. S ervic a a <et C'a udu .: <9 7c csm, a 12,ech arreu
/tIV $ l'":**sttden'e* M 't t* 7"~e(LdM.*,8 A e M L,.$ , 0a,s c*
^ 1 7*? rrM/ TerersCReM r"M AL A OATM, =s,rst. 7~,c.s e
. /12s*TetiM .S '"L *w ows9/ A".a SG44'ec.1 TO DesA.edawr
% ~xete p*,+e tA- . Il -
- fr*/s , A s ro ll1a /'Am.s W ') e/- /ei ir.h - / frem Ac. A 4 -n 9 A /* u e* a si. /A M M] a.A t*1_Ar .44/*fA $ $*?11+99 9YY . 3M w t*/ P
- h r. 2 -4 AP 0 4M 9 t'
' u j <
/7?A lwi n Y o r/ /A sr.A r- .
A.-n~3l /b bf/I , P /b /~arb.i E*/, * & b ~ su /k . A // -rAis a / /. 4 x n ' asor A, Ad nun w' - er/s - i
/$ t* WY$ /** f'd P NY!* bk ** * $ $f,. /l A . <0"' /,. ***P$ A- f"/ -
- I
. n /A e/a A r.1un - 2,. /Ax n Aa .
l 1
M A NRC Contract No. NRC43 73-118 Pago Li.hlfranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A ow.on of m Frarktn !netuie FRC A3signment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 191u3 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 448 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. #L
- i NOTES:
; .. ' j fore 1 ee&ruun 74 A&,ma/ a ud a A'A ms - e L:, m 4 / A 11 e am d r,- A , *
' J V /
m e A/ a- / e n. i 47ar a PwA us ' aa /A ei,4 k,,em s.n - m A /be
/ J ar,al~u/ A /A J n,'rss /mirr L u,. An er/As4 d /A-a/- ud e i e / /
'h AAn/w/r/
s w'd *sJn.< a i w/s whs, s/-na .d,,, *, AA
/ <
s f 7 9. / 7 0ss r r A C b/s m e d s,, n n l/~/is,->-n > l ~ 1 m at </ _ - s i _ .ec& / Ar- AA 4as,r/,aeu..
/
Xe_eAP sde C'A /, L b$ M M Mss"** f ss l P*ncY
,/ / o
.c4 da /A A//nmdi r "
J y , se,c rec r- 7e At Rec.mserc/ <aaedus.oa gepam mr- pas s.em fa n e AseSome M innreai n.s , i r end fa CawcLu a/ed' th e '~ d,esecf .o.a n .e p/,+a:sM A N use n raw " '" ~ra 3 f . L. (def 1) vue n z m vee e t.s p e u ssa re d n .c p Mwa a.ava.<* mar a f .3:o*f , 7,s~.3 p3re ed d,ess of I,*h (R t 3304 e . r-t/e J e ves. u cl sd4* /*d -
-] 7Ne 30c*f, 9 es:a sys,e.sa,o us,em u r'~
doava's rra.us ro sus eeM >->4 77:sarae.e ea iJ
- k da axps. soc.9 ro A*7' N sn P - /
b (b /2) - PGA #-4 7/9 Y ** Pf,h rsi* rm t* m . /*?? m m m - l . AL/NA *A!'
~
- PAmn t,rez $2 P11-f4 c e l st,n,nf*dA O d> .S" t/J P_f A to i i , 1 & J ,f s ,
_ Z f e r- c/ r s- , s >m & . 9 s 4 e
t 1 4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 7 LNIffranM!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Paga
'; A DWn ol The Tradhn fr's-Me - FRC Assignment No.13 S h-m and Race Sants. Pht's... Pa. 19103 (2151 443 Io
- FRC Task No. W6 3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N 1
3 1 NOTES:
.l unm a a r N
- .; --.w.-,,./7 < < ea,, # sA Aw
' .1 / %.e s / 4 bn* P4 A-wduerr n,,d K b m <? SA N e . E r b b's - >1 /< .e s j ' <
7 j ./ _ UAl w/t.ak m."N) /* m a h ev d 4n.tH 8 am tV) t smdh>lbsl *
*m w e j js < . <
de.m's _ m* YLrMd /is J n . Ad A *H r e se. * % d1W4 'r 7?b
/ /" '
_] s
.k e,jA h
- h,r-L'sir% t/lb d As Ms .ew t 2l a s $ bn** r f-IS lrw Wu*M b
- b. g
/*.us C J/ pre es. b do w-a $sh ube he M A n e % He */ en d t 7a *A 'W i r 0 tra &kom > fA nh mA d, 7%;/3 Cc-)S M) tv&M LtS//ew w
s i u
.J m g vi ite Tne 546 transducer was ' tested for one hour is a 320'T (fi.3 psig) satarated steam atmosphere and then for 12 more hours with the steam
..] temperature lowered.to 238'T (41.3 psig). The transJacer was esercised 7 after the first hour and also several times thereaf ter during the 13 hour 8
test period. Operation was obaer ed and recorded on equipment outside the test chamber. .- 5 Througrout the test the 546 remained functional and was still operating
, and in very -scod physical condition at' the con:pletion of the test.
After the test, the span of the unit was unchanged, but there was a
? zero shif t of about 3.3 psig. !".e test. report concludes that the 546 transducer would function both during and after an envisot:cental -
t atmosphere (as described) for up to 13 hours.* n . ll @)"Acocpletecntrolvalveasseablythatit.clud-daType546 transducer
-;4 was tested as part of a specific custsmer's qualificatico program. The
' ae,f ng tests are documented in Tfsher lab freble:s lo67, Peport 62A, and .
i in:1uded 27,000 operational cycles at 120'T during a 25-day period. j Tollowing tho aging procedures, the transducer was still functional, J although set' point shif ts of -3.6% (valve opening) and -11.3% (valve d closing) were coserved, j ' Af ter re-calibrsting the 'tiransducer to'cerpensste fer th'e te->perstere-
, ' ",j induced zero thift, the valva asse.sbly vss irradiated ta 10.5 megir,2ds
.j and then subjected to seisme vibration test.n3.it 4
9
.Y?
c 7'b Mperf rmeb wsY$ b$ewrNn s / J- kmenl! 1:
' d The Fisher Type 546 electro pneusatic transducer was originally designrd,
. -g and is currently sold, as a comercial product, without regard to II~.T.
Class II equiprent qualification requirements or to the sequential test -
. j procedures required for qualification in accordance with IIII 323-1974 Pj Vbile this produc- is occasionally included as an appurtenance to a control valre intended f er service in a nuclear plant appliration, Class
' II performance capabilities are neither state $ tor intended. Fisher has
, , no current intention of seeking II classification status for this product. s Consegue cly, no operability certification will be furnished for the transducer or the associated Type 67FR supply pressure regulator-for any
! type of seismic or environ = ental accident conditions as defined by IIII. #
4 s 5
-~.--,
r i 4 N RC Contract No. N RC-03-73-118 DJ Frank!:n Research Center FRC Freject No. CS257 Page
; A cwon c4 Th rranann inswie FRC Accignrnent No.13 Si 20th and Ru e Streets. PNta.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-10N FRC Task No. #4f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /J__
1 .
.l NOTES:
- 3) rhe ra.diala e n/~slian. ./Me' /caorcccen As na/ aeeover/Je At para cu/se cAseac Arij 4 c af'/A /3vna 's'se il mpher 7b /fe yrbc4Adn
- ia //e 4<< ce;<:e. cs&esrive se A, e/ ny A4, e/c, / , Afis si,,ee a ma/-~ .
eeis/r kr/ eas no/pco<rdef ~slaa4ia ofiKe' maA ria/r it leH- - er 6/e,mine /4 As,eA ny ma Aeis/.< ar o7poin*//e. rfeeef re,
?
/fd eju,,bmen/iAm da s deen. j~lj <d A fe /e/ e, en / w A" ee-g-ee/A eaBa A.h nu /A/ a// //e m a /eesa 4 co m p c/sinj //E
' l Y) 7k eJ//mak / f* el /),[l0sPJ CflAf er/Ytlh4St / dA Y wap&in /4.s auna w ' am e /4 b-e4*,y .:/L an,dn, A%a4 eci/r empi.i:rmy iM feaaedaem. JAe e n o mafem e77 di/ wu J-a,J. hcl',, e s4.aSin s,/ /& me/mu4 A fe#m AAomk ,
Me. 4ma /sy . den. - m /pasexA' . 74neA , in y-vimen/
.udm fu f.um fady/ A ak lefn/ni,Mee rpee/7f ag A Ma / .ur M< ora / s4 e.i,,p~ s,,,; in Aanssa' es As<e
. ;} ao/ feem a des-e.c r . 4
*b 9
- == [n o
5
.' i
A NRC Contract No. NRC 03-79-118 UD!fFrank:M Research Centsr FRC Project No. C5257 Pa00 A owon es m r enun bsuuie FRC Assignment No.13 mh and Race Sirerts.Jt!ts. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481(XC 7q FRC Task No. 44 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEV/ OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2/ .
, MAINTENANCE AND REPLACD.ENT SCHEDULE S124 MARY The following information regarding the maintenance and replacement j
schedule (s) for components, sub-cceponents, and materials has been provided by 1 the Licensee.
/
' ' N /
- Ma*
, l'nps - ;e urz 'm >se 7 Ace ey & esec.rrGfuew7:e m a ce,c s .caans ao s ,e -as
[d.heduo d &%, s ai f,*
e/
OuN/t i/ t
,4 7* A.to As7:4< Sc'Avi ce 7'?sr a sc ennivC.*
/S CMM:w.s TRe:e Gmper w.9 70 Ae AffAsse:r 272 / /G s f+.4.2L xsucc? s spesc) kf/A! efin 4 ".* Y &W4Y $/Wc:, Y'st a*: i s'D Ae f.n*fe A d O r :.e . w a .n v e .
i O e O l
- ' )~ .
9 1 e' i . , e i " s e G 4 9
.. w *e e *
- t
.' 6_
'* NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-Fi?
Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A ovsen of N Frankt.n resume FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. PhJa . Pa. 1910312151441N0 FRC Task No. %6 . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 7-
. ~
4 . EQUIFMENT ITEM h0. 22
. THERMOCOUPLE LOCATED IN THE REACIOR BUILDING PALL TRINITY MICR0 MODEL TYPE CU/6 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 22 L*CENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): RBCLC HEAT EXCHANGE OUTLET TEMPERARTRE C0hTROL (TE 70-23)
LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): J-5 [33]
- DESIGNATION FOR D'EFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY8
~
(See Section ;l of this TER for Legend) R, T, 71*, RT, P, H, CS. S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable +. ; LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
. Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item { la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ?b, ?c, ?d System Consideration Review 0;, !b, i, td, !c, Of - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, 50, 55, 'c, Of, M, 55, 51, Sj- - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Laplementation 52, Ch- , Equipment Sumary Maintenance and Replacement S edule Sumary ?:, 'b, 'c-s
.'I h h ~
m e g -ED e-
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-M-118 Page tilffranMin Research Centar FRC Prclect No. C5257 A casen a Ihe r,.nat n insittwee FRC Asoignmont No.13 lb nh ami Race $rru es. PE!4.. Pa 19103 c:5J 441tKC- FRC Task No. 466. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 j StiMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES M THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECXED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 4 i 1 Tne Licensee (has/M: .0 0) provided a response to the SER concerns. l The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE . environnental service conditicass
' ~
The Licensee has presented information which shows there a_re no
. outstanding qualification deficiencies.,'
X The Licensee (has/% : mt) proposed $cberectiveactionforthisequipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) bean provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
._ _ ,;m Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source
;_;_ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
Equipment relocation to a inild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress
.Jg. Other ((OUAL //~/r*47~mM MfEMMEM7~ CW- C4wG )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. X The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed ~
. corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action . )
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
Qualified I.a II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt . Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available e
$6 a G
;-- y-.- - _ , . - - ..a., ,y . , - ..,.3
i I I Q-bJ rank!!n Resaarch Center NRC Contract No. NPC43-79-118 Page FRC Prclect No.C5257 A own or Th. rrank!!n Insetue FRC Assignment No.13 2 4G6
0*h and Race Streets. Phca.. Pa. 19103 (2151448-10t 0 FRC Task No.
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM 9 DESIGNATION: NP,C REQUIREMENTS X = OEFICIENCY l Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Y Mequate Similarity Betieen Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
; Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __ d Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied - i Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied .. _
'~
;_12 Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied - -: ,
Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies . (If.Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
. Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied, .
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) t DESIGNATICN: 5 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
~
I.a Equipment Qualified . , 4 I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
, II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established M II.D Equipment Not Qualified j II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
' - or Replacen.nt Schedule Justified
-4 III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
',n,d III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
~( IV Docu:hentation Not Made Available
- (
e e
NRC Centract No. NRC-C3 73118 4 2
' f. Frsnktn Roaarch Center FRC Frefcci No. C5:57 Face A Cu=cm rr Aw Im-ne FRC Assignraent No.13 3a
- oih and R . ser.cs. rha... Pa.19103 c? t) 4aS too) FRC Task No. __4Mo EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. El ,
.t
! LICSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER l
Qualified - X Qualificatictd As sessesat Ct-Going,2 To be Raplaced by a Qualified Cenponent -- E{ No?!S USED IN RI'/TSICN 4 {3 NOTE 1 Test specimens in References- 25 and 26 were. ASCO Model No.'s 8300 364F and 9300 361Yr. . F 50T22_X Cuali*1 cation assess =ent ongoing.
.3
. NOTE 3 . Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation
. dose than enat derived by engineering analysis.
4 _. _. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as - applicsble; assessment ongoing. NCTE 5 All :netallic ccmponents: not subject to ther:nal or .
.radiatica degradacion at the specified levels.
NofI 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be
. substantiated.
NOT3 7 , Further equipment identification needed to assure ,
, applicability of test report.
_ SOTE 5 The 510 CU Trip /Calibratica Sys:e:s is insensitive to . pre.sure changes; a pressure qualification test is not consider ed necessary (RMT- Apc 12770, Revision , A) .
.. . f s
~
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page
. Ud Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 A D%s'en cine rrerkim insmute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Rue Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215)448 1000 FRC Tas< No. %b 1 ~
) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. U J N
,h,
-- j. EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23
' .j PRESSURE TRANSMITIER IDCATED IN THE REACTOR ECILDING, ELEV.198'0" GE/MAC MODEL 551
' }ii REQUIRED OFERATING TIME:
TER CEECKSEEET NO. 23 1 HOUR
'q LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED i FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSMITS CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE (PT .
80-75) [ LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): N-4 (33] l
.s __
.4 .
'i ; -
4 5 i - t
'i . -
3 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLYI '
; (See Section 3 af this TER for Le<jend)
R, T, @', RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, z-
., *,,j Not stated, Not applicable gA LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
.' a
.j Contents Checksheet Page No.
- Equipment Item la y
j Su:mnary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
; Equipment Environmental Qualification Sum: nary Forms 2
..'_.'3 Sc, M-Licensee Response to NRC S C 3a, 2-b, System Consideration Review 4;, OL, 4d, ou, 40 -
'. [ ; ~,
- n Equipment Environmental Qualification Review E, 55, Sc, %, - e,
,j 5;, Sh, %,
S G, J
~
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Ir plementation f:, 6h . Equipment Summary 4 Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Sum: nary 7;, 7b, 7c=
^
9
i NRC Contraet No. N PC.-03-70-118 4((J Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pa03
} A Dh of N franan freve FRC Ass!gnment No.13 l b-
.; N er$d Rua 5 reets. Fhda.. Pa 19103 a215) 44%%%3' FRC Task No. . -f[rfp EQUlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlFMENT ITEM NO. 23
.l
-t
,]; StMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES T THE NRC SER - ONLY CH.OED ITEMS AR2 APPLICABLE:
m 3 1 Tne Licensee (has/h) provided a response to the SER concerns. i
; The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE -
environmental service cor$1tions. The Licensee has presented infor=ation which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (hasA ew) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) t,4en provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment- ites. N Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification - Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiat*.on source , verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress X Other (hospment e epkcerwen4f i f oo al. can not be, sudanhMJ
= =
T The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a b~a sis for justification for interim operatiori. N The Licensee (est/has not) provided a schedule for the propbsed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) _
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency . III.a Exempt h Modification II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available , O
.e .
i NRC Contract No. NRC 03-73-118 U FRC Project No.C5257 Page d Frank.in Research Center A own ond. Frank!!n Inst:rute FRC Assignment No.13 2 m.nd R ce Strws. PN:a . Pa. 19 03 (2151 44s-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (oG t j EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPf/ENT ITEM NO. 2.3 '
.1
.?
U I i
~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM l! , DESIC.~AI!CN: X = DEFICIENCY NRC kEQUIREMENTS 1.j Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate 1 -
' Adequate Similarity Betdeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established -
Aging regradation Evaluated Adequately A
- Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
-9,;.1 Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __
'. .d Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
o Peak Temperature Adequate
~ o Peak Pressure Adequate =
' o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergenc,e. Satisfied . _ _ ;y Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ,
- m. , ?
l Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied , . Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies , (If Any) Satisfied Cri) 'ia Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied tia Regarding Instru:nent Accuracy Satisfied
.[ <i 2 ration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied .
4 ., Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:
- X = CATEGORY
<j NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified ,
I.b Equipment Qualificatica Pending Modification X II.a Equipc?at Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified ,
.' II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
. g.. III.a Equipment Dceinpt Frora Qualification
- e III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available g
h-
A NRC Contract No. NRC-a3-79-118 PBCO
'16Frankhn
. Reuerth Centa FRC Frefect No. CS:57 A c-i.m et The r<enu:a terme FRC Ase.lgnment No.13 3o 3:h and Racs Serws. Na.. Pa. 19103 (21D 44S 1000*. FRC Tcsk No. Mofo ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.3 .
t LICDISEE RESICNSE ':0 NRC SIR Qualified . Qualification Assessment On.-Going, { N To be Replaced by a Qualified Camponent __ i . i. b l NO"!S USED IN REVTS!CN 4 33]
~
f . , . Non 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were Asco Medel No.'s 8300 364F and 3J00 361YT. . 50T2 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. 9 NOTE 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a hi-ner radiatien dese than that derived by engineering analysis. , { NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as , applicables assessment ongoing. NOTE 5 All metallic ecmponents: not subject to thermal or radiatica degradation at the specified levels. NOTE E N Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be
. substantiated.
Nor3 7 , Further equipment identification needed to assure - applicability of test report. sors S The 510 DU Trip /Calibratien System is insensitive to . pressure enanges a pressure qualification test is not censidered necessary (KMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A).
. NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 I N :.Frankhn Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 Page-A DNmon of The Franktn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Pt .!a.. Pa.19103 d215) 44 + 1000 FRC Task No. 66 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 i
) PRESSURE TRANSMITTER IDCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING, ELEV. 198'0"
,. GE/MAC MODEL 551 4532K11001 REQUIRED OPERATING IIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 24 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED 1 FUNCTION (PI. ANT ID): TRANSMITS CONTAINMENT S/ RAY PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE
( PT 8 0-69, 80r-4 7, 80-54) - LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): J-1, N-2, N-3 [33] t- .
+.i
=
~
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLYt (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, (M, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHIIKSHEETS:
; Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la
- ", Su:rmary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
, Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2 ' y-sti
^ k, Syste:n Consideration Review 'c, , if _
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, Ib, Sc, !', b, ~!, 53, (h M 5} - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Gev-6b , Equipment Summary
"- Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Su:=ary 'a, 'b. 'e
As NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118
'i Y.Nranktn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pa00 A ousu a The rranklin Ins:* vte FRC Ass!gnrnont No.13 lb
. 20!5 an.d Race $rreets. Phifa.. Pa 19103(215) 449 1000' FRCTssk No. 4GG
- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. &
. SU.tu.ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
}
4 1 Tne Licensee (hasA:: ut) provided a response to the SER concerns.
; The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE'
~
environmental service conditions. ( The Licensee has presented information which shows there_are no ' -j
; outstanding qualification deficiencies.
7 X The Licensee (has/'. . ..e t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
- item whose qualification has not been fully established.
- Justification for int 71m operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equ... ment- ites.
X' Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification - c Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress
; .X_ Other (AfM.ACfMFMr//;' CUAL t~ANNer* M D&rr4N77AYGD )
- - The Licensae has provided other information for this equipment item d that can .be construed a's a basis for justification for interim operation.
_y,,The Licensee (hae/has not) prerided a schedule for the proposed
- 4 corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective 1
action .) The Licensee states that the equipment i em does not require qualificacion j' and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIl.M CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ,
+
c 4UNU Frank!!n Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC43 79-118 FRC Prclect No. C5257 Page A Cw.on of The Franktn Instrute FRC Assignment No.13 2
. Dh and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 966 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 1
t EQUIPMENT ENVIIiONMENTAL QUALIFICATION sided.ARY FORM 4 DESIGNATION: t NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY
.I
' Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate :(
Mequate Similarity BetVeen Equipment and Ter*, Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Establish' ed to Identify Aging Degradation __
' ~
- Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Aequired)
Criteria Reggeding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
~
o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Luration Adequate
, o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Expcaure (If Required) 'Adry.juate
, s Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
' Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation _ Satisfied - 3 -
Criter' a Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied' s- m - - --- =- Criteria Regarding Test Failures or, Severe Anomalies ( , (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tesc Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied t J1 .
.i .
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: j
.y NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
?1
*[ I.a Equipment Qualified ,
I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X
-~ '
II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established
, II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requiremente Except. Qualified Life -- ; j .
or Replacement Schedule Justified
; III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualificatirn
't -
III.D Equipment Not in the icope of the Qualification Review IV Documantation Not Made Available w O e e W e
4 NRC Ccnfraet No. NRC-03 7Tr.198 Page UU!$ Frank!!n Research Center FRC Profe.ct ?'o. C'_257 A Ne om Ts.mn inenae FRCAssignment No.13 30
.th .no a.c. sum. Pu... Pa. 19103(215) 4 123 FRC Task No. 4 cog i
EQUIP AENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2_f .
. e tIcriszz RESrcNSE T3 NRC SER Qualified
, Qualification Assessment On-Coing X To be Replaced by 4 Qttalified Cr:ponent --
0{ NC"IS USED IN RIvi$!CN 4 {33] Non 1 Test specisers in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YF. - ECTE 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. NOTS 3 _ Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation
. dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
NOTE 4 Irisulation qualification per Ref er.esces.46_or 47 as
- applicable; assessment ongoing.
NOTE 5 All metallic cemponentar not subject to thermal or radiatien degradation at the specified levels. NOTE 6 X Iquipment will be replaced if qualification canne- be
.. substantiated.
s NOT3 7 , rurther equipment identificat'.on needed to assure ; applicability of test report. Nor3 S The 510 CU Trip /Calibratien Syste:s is insensitive to pressure changes; a pressure qualification test is not considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). 2 m
NRC Centract No. NRC-03-79-118 N L Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A ci.4mn of h Frankrin inwaute FRC Assignment No.13
~
20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 1910312151448.icxo MI,
, la j FRC Task No.
,l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26
j EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 25 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE REACIOR BUILDING, ELEV. 281'0" GE/MAC MODEL 551 JB394616611 i REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 ROUR 5 TER CHECKSHEET NO. 25
'i.
LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED
= :] . FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PRESSURE INDICATION (PT ID-46A, 3)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): G-1, G-2-[33] - i __ N
^
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:
~
- (See Section 3 of this TER for Le<3end)
R, T, yr, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, Qi, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
, a.1
,9 Not stated, Not applicable
; LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
Contents Checksheet Page No. O Equipment Item la t Su= mary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Su= nary Forms 2
]'
Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 95, 2c, ?d
. .j System Consideration Review - * ., 4L, 4c, "A da. Af Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 'm, 55, Oc, 53, 50, C# _
b , Sh, 31, 3j - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6, CL , Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7m, 7L, 7<
$ e
4bt2; Frank!!n Research Center NRC Centract No. NRC-03-D-118 Paga FRC Prciect No. C5257 A cu n oi ne naeun tmnvui. FPC Assignrnent No.13 lb w eax.suem.P % ..Pa 19103 (215) 443 1000- FRC Task No. McG l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.5 f .
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE LESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY-CHECKED ITE45 ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/We4 provided a response to the SER concerns. I
- The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or. wil3.. function when exposed to the applicable DBE'
- environmental service-conditions. '
. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
l 1 The Licensee (has/L m-;.) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. I Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. M Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified' equipment =-
"q Equipment modification- '
Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source
~
Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment .
. Qualification testing of equipment in progress a ' & Other (EnoiomerA A
solatenervt % if outMitdien can n.t be schMM )
; The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
.i that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. .
- 3 d The Licensee tueur/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed
] corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
i -i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
-] and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY SASED ON REVIEW
, - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt
- J II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope
, II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ,
5 -
'G $ "
A NRC Contract No, NRC-03-73-118 Page
. UdFranklin Resench Center FRC Project No. C5257 A omn oi n.. Frankt:n tnstituie FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race St eers. Phca.. Pa. 19103(215)448 l W FRC Task No. %b EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION.
SUMMARY
FORM
- DESIGNATION:
NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY I Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate M
-j Mequate similarity BetJeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established .
.. Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacccent Schedule Established (If Required)
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __
, Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
I Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate 4 o Peak Pressure Adequate
, o Duration Adequate
, o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately -
o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied . _ _
- Criteria Regarding Radiation .Satisfiedi. _ ; . 1 ?. _ . -
Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Test. Failures or Severe Ancmalies - (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
} Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied ,
c)
~
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: ." NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY d I.a Equipment Qualified ' I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
.l or Replacement Schedule Justified
; III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
'O III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available enus O
6 r
~
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 000) Fran'dn Rcwarch Center F a,q e FRC Frefect No. C 257 A c~.ma of 7he rranun ineMe FRC Assignment No.13 - 30
.hd R.ca Seecs. PSA Pa. 19103 (215) 4a8-ING . pgC Task No, 4 GGy.
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. z5 , r,IcrNSES RESPONSS 'IO NRC SER Qualified -
, _ Qualificacion Assess :sanc.Cn-Going.
N To be Replaced by a Qualified Cc 2ponene -- 04T No Is USED IN Arv!SICN 4 {33] 30T3 1 Test speci= ens in References 25 and 26 were Asc0 Model No.*3 a.100 364F and 8300 361YT. - ECTE 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. NOTS 3 . Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicable assessment or. going. Nor! 5 All metallic cesponents: not subject to thermal or
, radiatica degradation at the specified levels.
MOTE 6 Equip =ent will be replaced if qualificatica cannot be
., substantiated.
k NOT3 7 . Further equipment identificat, ion needed to assure
-1 applicability of test report. .
5072 S The 510 CU Trip / Calibration Syste:s is insensitive to pressure changes a pressu:= qualification test is not considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). e *
- s M A
_,-.. NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118
, Ei![L Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Divs.on of The Frank!!n fnintute FPC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phea . Pa 19103 f215) 4481a00 FRC Task No._. W (,
.t '
EQUIPMdNT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26 7
~*
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26
~! PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING, .ELEV. 281'0"
<. GE/MAC MODEL 551 L3484611175 REQUIRED OPERATING TDfE: 1 EOUR TER CHECRSHEET NO. 26
.? LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED 3 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PRESSURE INDICATION (FI ID-45)
~-j LICNSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): G-3 [33] .
t -
;i
? 4
' a, 4
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY:
' * ~'
(See Section 3 of this TER for Le<jend) R, T, Gr, RT, P, H, CS r h S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, s 1 , Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF A? PLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No.
.2 Equipment Item la
,j Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Rasponse to NRC SER 3a, "i, L, 34 System Consideration Review It, 4c, id, Ic, if -
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52 S' , 50, CA- Ca- 5fm 4, 55, 51, "j _ - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ' :, Sb - , l
. Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary S . 'b, '.-
I t l 1 J l
i
/ A NRC Centract No. NRC-03-73-118 I ddk Frank!:n Research Center Fi1C Project No. 05:57 Paga
< A Du,cn of ne F enk!;n Insn*u;e FRC Assignment No.13. Ib
.T:han4 Race Streets. Phi!a.. Pa 19103(215) 444-1000 FRC Task No. $/oG
! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION HEVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21e i
I j StIMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE TPPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/ ': : M provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is j qualified and/or will function when exposed, to the applicable DBE environmental service coaditions.
;J.
The Licensee has presented information which shows there_are no
.j outstanding qualification deficiencies.
1 The Licen.see (has/h . 2 ;. ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
; item whose qualification has not been fully established.
. Jitstification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item.
X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment __ aa= Equipment modification - Equipment relocation above submergence level
~
Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress X Other ( E4 wo ornen5 t'eplaserren4- 64u a_1. ch iso-4be Sudedmih h
- A The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that c.sn be construed as a basis for justification for interim a operation.
X The Licensee Taear/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed' corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
.j The Licensee states that the equipment ite:n does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
, - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
. I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency 3 CI.b Modification III.a Exempt -
II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope
, II.b Not Qualified IV Docu:lentation Not Available ,
e q o
4-l0bIJ Frank 5n Research Center N RC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page. A Dwon of h Frankhn insttute FRC Assignment o.13 2 20 5 and Race Strms. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Tak No. fo _,,
! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REvi2W OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D te
', EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATICN: NRC REQUIREMEN"'S X = DEFICIENCY
- Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N
^
- Mequate Similarity BettJeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established .
- - Aging Degradation Evaluate'd Adequately
- Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
- Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation ,_
i criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
'i o Peak Temperature Adequate
-j o Peak Pressure Adequate
! o Duration Adequate
- o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate 3
Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence-Satisfied
- e.. 2 Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ' ; ._: .- .
Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied .
, Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies' - t- -
(If Any) Satisfied ~ .. Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instru2nent Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Legin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied ,
) Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
DESIGNATION:
. NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY,
. . .x i
I.a Equipment Qualified ' I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X
*
- II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established I .
II.b Equipment Not Qualified
; II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
.j or Replacement Schedule Justified
,d III.a- Equipment Exetspt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available S
t l
.! A NRC Contract No. NRC-034118 Paga j N2!J Frank!!n Rewarch Center FRC FrclKt No. C5257 A DNun cl 7he Frank!!n lns fura FRC Ase!qnrnent No.13 3a ns and R=. Strws. Pha., Pa. 19103(215) 443 1000 FRC Tack No. 4foCo
; EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW:OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.Z_/a
; LI O SEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER j Qualified -
2 l Qualification Assess =ent On-Coing
- r N Td' be< Replaced by a. Qualified Component.
. ] ,
l 1 b4. 1 I 1 (
; NOTIS USED IN REvtSION {33]
103 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YF. i . ECTS 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. NOTS 3 - Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
}
.J NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as
- applicable; assessment ongoing.
. NOTE 5 All metallic components; not subject to thermal or
_j , radiation degradacion at the specified levels. i l NOTS 6 I. Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be i ., substantiated. NOTE 7, Further equipment identification needed to assure ~ applicability of test report. - NOTS S The 510 DU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to - pressure changes a pressure qualification test is not considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). m 6
,,n -n- ,m- p. - - .
g y y
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 LNL Franklin Research Center Page FRC Prclect No. C5257 A Dmsaon oi ne Frankt.n inst:tute FRC Assignrnent No.13 la 25 and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810tio -FRC Tack No. W6 4 j EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 , '] EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27
-* PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN TEE REACIOR BUILDING, ELEV. 281'0" ROSEMOUNT MODEL 1151 REQUIRED OFERATING TD'E: 1 EOUR TER CEECKSHEET NO. 27
; LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REACIOR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT (Pr 36-07A, B, C, D; c'.
3 6-08A, B, C, D) = LICENSEE SUEMITTAL: SCEW(S): G-49 THROUGH G-56 [33] 2 I f
! DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIPCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: '
- (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
T, QT, RT, P, B, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
- 1 Not stated, Not applicable
?:l
'I LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la i Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC' SER lb
... Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
. Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , 3 b , Ber-.24
- System Consideration Review h, th, !;, t', M A{ .
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review k, Eh, h, Ed, '^ 55, b , L, 31, Si - [. Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation h, 56 , Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Su= mary ~, ia, iv
U i DmUSU!J Franktn Research Center NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 PEGS
-' A c;v;oon of The Franan Nue FRC Assi;;nment No.13 lb
.j 20m and Race 50ms. PMs.. Pa 19103 GIS 44310f0 FRC Task No. 4 C, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO 22. .
q A
' ~j SUdMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
s X _ Tne Licensee (has/h ': :r t) provided a response to the SER concerns.
;.' The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is ,
' qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE
~
environmental, service conditions. c .1,
- 3 The Licensee has presented information which shows therewe no
; -i outstanding qualification deficiencies.
li - 1 X The Licensee (has/het) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
- X Justification for interim operation (has/' : nut) been provided by the i Licensee for this equipment- item.
1
! X Corrective action specified by the Licensae:
j.) .
'. . ,__ X Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification
~
Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source
~*
d Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment celocation to a mild environment - Qualification testing of equipment in progress
? L. Other ( OuM/MAY/M AtVMPMLNf CA/- GOWG ) ' -$ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item d
that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim j -
.Q operation. .a ' ?! L The Licensee (r.ae/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective *] .3 3 action .) .A .s f;
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. l DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
'5 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) , . :. 1 j I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency J T-b Modification III.a Exempt f
[iT.a Qualification Not Estaolisheg III.b Not in Scope
"'TI .o Not w 'ifiua IV Documentation Not Available .
. -j
..j k
. 1 s
t NRC Contract No. NRC43 73-118 Page A[~db FrankHn Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 A Die,n of The Franidin Institute FRC Asalgnment No.13 2 20th and Race Streen. Phlta.. Fs. 19103 (215) 443-1000 FRC Task No. W.4
~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22. - EQUIP! DENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS l Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Betdeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __ i Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) i criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
- o Peak Temperature Adequate c Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation, Satisfied'. _2:
Criteria Regarding Test . Sequence Satisfied ; - ..,=1 Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe . Anomalies ' . _ .__ (If Any) Satisfied . - Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:* Y = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY 4 I . a' Equipment Qualified , I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification _ II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established 1 II.b Equip ~ent Not Qualified
- II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
}
e I 1 en a
4 NRC Centract No. NRC-03-79-118 .
'1 Fago !
i !C
. rank!!n Research Center FAC Prefect No. C5".'.7
~
A c-w aa c4 m r..en t-etura FRC Assignraent No.13 3a
. 20:h and he Streets. N'a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4Gd EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICAT1GN REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO; 27 i
LICENSEE RESPCNSE 'IU NRC SER A j X Qualified (14.} Qualification Msessment On-Coing To be Replaced by a Qualified Cc=ponent-
.-? b I
I 1 i tev. Cate: 2oril 2. 19?2 (33]
.1tne Mtte Point Unit 1*
c:r scrent Review Se: ary Sheet Equ'ipeent: Re actor pressure trarsmitter 3!.01 A-0 Manuf acturer: "Rosemunt Medel: 1151 CP Safety Function: Initiatas reactcr scram and t:.rtine s co salve closure or
. hign esactor pressure Qualification Ciscrepancy: Lack of qualification data .
' Justification for Continued C;eration:
The transmitters mnitor reactor press. re and initista protective action on hign reactor vessel pressure. As a result of a hign energy Itne Ortat or less .
' of c:olant accicent, initiation of protective action oc:urs within a sna.t time of the event. The trantmitters will have performed their intanced safety function before beleg suDjected to sucstantial acverse envir rseetal 3 C3nditions.
Potential f ailure of these transmitters subsecuent to cerf erming their Intenced f JnClion *Culd nCI adversely affect acCicent 91tigat1CR. .
- 1 Sasec on the a:ove. eshti.*ued c::eration is justified untti the transmitters art Qualified or Ptplated mitfl a doCzente$ Cualified transmitters.
aJ 9 e t e.
/f
.* 1 I
8 B
.h
.N N RC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 UdEFranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C52g Page A Civun ci ns Frankan tnsmute -
FRC Assignment No.13 3h
, 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4(oG
, Ef UlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 i LINSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued) t E
f i 4[35] NoTTS USED IN RIVIS!CN - Im3 1_ _ Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Medel No.'s 8300 364F and $300 361TF. scrrs 2 L Cualification assess =ent ongoing. Bots 3 Equi;=ent was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived- by engineering analysis. BOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as- . a 4 applicabler assoss=ent ongoing.'. , u :. m 5072 5 All metallic ccmponentst not subject to thermal or - _- - radiatien degradation at tue specified levels.- . NofE 6 Equi;=ent will to replaced if qualification cannot be i substantiated. . Nors 7 rurther equipient identification needed to assure
, applicability of test report.
-t l BOTE 8 The $10 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to pressure changes a pressure qualificatica test is not censidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revisien A).
O i . 4 3
'*ee.
t 9 4 4
,1
.i
} A NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 Page 8
UEI.rFranklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257
- A Dwon of The Franklin f asteuse . FRC Assignment No.13 l c-
.M and RxeStreets. Ph?.a . Ps 19101(215)444-1000 FRC Task No.- Mo 'o --
I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMbNTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28
-! TEMPERATURE SWITCH LOCATED IN THE STEAM TUNNEL, ELEY.~240'O" i FENWAL MODEL 1700240 i REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR
-l TER CHECKSHEET NO. 28 i
LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 827, 28 q FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MAIN STEAM LINE TO RPS (TS 13-10A THROUGH H, J THROUGH
,' N', P, Q, R)
LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): Hal THROUGH H-16 [33] g __ d
~-a.
. DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLY:
(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, RT, P, H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
$ Not stated, Not applicable 1 ~
LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No.
.a
.- Equipment Item la i 1 Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Envitonmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
; Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, -? b , '- M System Consideration Review *a, it, ';, 40, 4w, C- -
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, l Sg, Sh, 51, Sj , S'<., CA, -
- s. > S m , Ca , To3 Cp Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation h, !b-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Senedule Summary "2 'b, 'c 4
i 4 NRC Confraet No. NRC-03-79-118 Page
, dif Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Chisson of The FranMin !nstitute FRC Assignment No.13 lb l2:h and bce Sheets. Phita.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. V45 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2d i
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: [TneLicensee (ha s/has-,wt) provided a response to the SER concerns. _[_TheLicensee (has/M nnt) specifically stated that the equipment is qualitied and/or wil1 function when exposed to the applicable DBE . environmental service conditions, l The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
'j outstanding qualification deficiencies.
The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment 9 item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. Corrective action specifie'd by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment - Equipment modification - m -- Equipment relocation above submergence' level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source .
~ -
Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment
~
Qualification ~ testing of equipment in progress
,; other ( )
Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
't that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.
The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed
. corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective action .)
3, The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION Of RESULTANT NRC CUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- 1 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt . III.a Qua11tication Not Established] III.b lbt in Scope II.D Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
~
'l 1
- - . ~ - . . . . I
] N,.sFrank!!n Research Center NRC Con!ract No. NRC-03-79-118
'q FRC Project No. C5257 P209
, A Dwen d The Frantin !ns~.rute . FRC And;;nmcat No.13 2-j ec s and R.c. strues. Puta.. Pa. t9103 (2)s) 448. Icro FRC Tc:k No. 4'44
$ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. B_
E
-i i
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM
.' DESIGNATION:
- . NRC REQUIREMENTS- X = DEFICIENCY 1
t Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate
.] *
~*
Adequate Similarity SetVeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established- )( I Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately. X i Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)- X.
] Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o ' Peak Pressure Adequate
- X l o Duratien Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied .
Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
..i .I $ DESIGNATION:
X = CATEGORY
}
NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified , i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
)(
II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
'i
. or Replacement Schedule Justified i III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available _,
~
I j .
't
gag NRC Centract No. NRCC-<7-118 Ji!L& rank!!n Research Center FRC Pmiect No. C5257 Page A ONimn ol N Fuen icchne FRC Assignrnent No.13 3a a hanoa.c.str..es.r%:...Pa. 19103 (215) 4e1oco FRC Task No. _ 95S EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28 i. LIOSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER i d Qualified Qualification Assessment On-Going To be Replaced by a Qualified Ccaponent 3 f, g % T
+ -
t
.e G
O e e e M EH
.- 'I ,
a
'~1 NPC Contract No. NBC-03-79-118 4
'! 4'[Fradlin CJ Reu erch Center FRC Project No. C5257 _ Page
?- A D ssenof N FranunImuure . FRC Assignment No.13 - 57'
'. 2thh _end h e Sweett l'hda . Pa 191u3 8215) 4',410:0 FRC Task No. 4G6 4 >
i ! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.7-OL ' , t i I
.i l
{ Checksheets _Sa. *cu_ So have seen removea aue to the j proprietary nature. of infomation cont:ained therein. f. d 1 i a __ i
\
O 1 m
.3l
.j s
9 e \
, <4.
t e e 9 A* .
~
l c -- J* ,i e
$. o
. . . . *e
- - g e e a-p - w+r= *++ e-
,4 1. NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 1 .i5 Frank!!n Research Centir FRC Project No. C5257 Page j A om, san of n, rranunInsmute FRC Assignment No.13 la l 20th end Race Snects. PMa,. Pa 1H03 (215) 44$ICA) FRC Task No. H:6 I
l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlFMENT ITEM NO. 79 1 1 1 1 EQt;IPMENT ITEM NO. 29 D/P TRANSMITIER LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING, ELEY. 281'0" I ROSEMOCAT MODEL ll51DP 7E22T0003PB
] REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS
! TER CHECKSEEET NO. 29 l LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED
.1 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES RPS STEAM FIDW (D?r 36-06A, B, C, D) ,
I LICENSEE *SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): M-1 TEROUGILM [33] i { .
- 1 1
i i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:
,; (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
R, T, QP, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None,
! Not stated, Not applicable J
9 LISTING OF APPLICABLE CRECKSHEETS: , s
.j Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la i Sur:: mary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
' .i Equipment Enviro.imental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 1
-} Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ?" M, ?d
,f System Consideration Review $0, '. b , ::, 'I, h, E -
Equipment Environmental ' Qualification Review 50, 55, 5, "A %, if,
* ~
- 5,3 5', Si, :j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation da, 55-I Equipment Sumary Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary
;, 7b, ~= c
+
_m
4809 F,.nur:n Reseerch center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 i FRc eroject No. cs257 Paca A DMsan of The Franan tneture FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Rue Streers. Ph;!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000
- FRC Task No. _ #(
l' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. #_2. i 4
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
-k X Tne Licensee (has/h 2 . : t) provided a response to the SER concerns.
1 The Licensee (has/ha;s not) specifically stated that the equipment is
*' ;1 qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE I.
environmental service conditions.
~
The Licensee has presented information which shows thre are no outstanding goalification deficiencies.
}
_X,The Licensee (has/':: net) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
, item whose qualification has not been fully established.
_X, Justification for -interim operation (haa/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment ites. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee -
.~ .
T Equipment replacement with qualified equipment ; r -- Equipment modification f Equipment relocation'above submergence level--- - Relocate or 9hield equipment from radiation source
- Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) -
Equipment relocation to a .nild environment , Qualification testing of aquipaent in progress
', _X Other ( duMine-4rmy MffrTMEM7 OW-Gen /9 )
, .p ;
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
.i .that can be construed as a basis for justification for interi.m f.4 operation.
I _2(_ The Licensee (haa/has not) provided a schedule for the ' proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
'] The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
,j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
-DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
~
.i I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt . .
} Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope i
II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available .
.i
1
~i A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118
$l, Frenklin Research Center FRC Prtjer,t No. C5:57 Paga
'l '
A Dh ol N Funan insntute FRC Aesignrnent No.13 2 20th and Rue Sarwis. PMa.. Ps. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #46-1 I i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. af_. - 1 1 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATISN
SUMMARY
FORM
-J . DESIGNATION:
NRC REQUIREMENM X = DEFICIENCY j Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate 1
- j Mequate Similarity BetJeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established '
j Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
, j Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
> Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation --
Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
; Criteria Regarding T2mperature/ Pressure Exposure:
3 o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate
].;
o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Envelop 2d Adequately j o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate
- Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
! Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied s Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied =
Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied e Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied -
! Criteria Regardi.ng Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) l-4 .
DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
.y,
't
, I.a Equipment Qualified .
,'i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification j II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X
, 1 II.D Equipment Not Qualified
< 1 II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life j or Replacement Schedule Justified Equipment Exempt From Qualificatien
; III.a l III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review I IV Documentation Not Made Available
+.j -
y % 0
,. . A NRC Ccntract No. NRC-C3-A118 l.!\$' Funk!!n Resaarch Center FRC Prclect No. CS257 Psge A cie et h Frankt.n inseue FRC Aseignment No.13 30 m .n4 ax, sms. Phe.. 73.19103 (2m 448 !cm FRC Task No. 4GCo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.M LICENSEE RESPONSE ' 0 NRC SER i
- 4 X Q2alified -
02alification Assessment On-coing To be Replaced by a Q2alified Ccmpecenc __ 4 {33]
~
MC IS USED IN RIv!SICN 4 _
~
sota 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were Asco Model No,'s 8300 364F and 8300 361Y?. E0:3 2 Y cualification assessment ongoing. j 3073 3 _ Equip:nent was tested successfully to a higher radiction j dese than that derived by engineering analysis. I No:2 4 Insulatien qualification per References 46 or 47 as, applicables assess =ent ongoing.
. NOTE 5 All metallic ecmponentar not subject to thermal or radiation degradation at the specified levels.
Ncrf3 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualificatien cannot be
..'. 3 g substantiated.
! NOT3 7 , further equipment identificatica needed to assure
! applicability of test report. -
u NOT3 S The 510 CU Trip / Calibration sys em is insensitive to . pressure enan?.sr a ;ressure qualificatisn test is not censidered necessary (RMT-Kpt 12770, Revision A).
- i
.i
a
! NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 A[EFrank!;n Research Center
- d. FRC Project No. CS257 Paga A Cuson of N Franktn insinure FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 21514481000 ~ FRC Task No. 46/
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW' OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 70
+
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 30 D/P TRANSMITTER IDCATED IN THE REACIOR BUILDING, ELE't. 281'0" _,. , ROSEMOUNT MODEL ll51DP l REQUIRED OPERATING TLME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 30 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES RPS DRWELL PRESSURE (DPT 201.2-476A, B, C, D)
- LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): N-17 THROUGITN-20 [33] ~
3 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) T, (71', RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
^
Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECXSHEETS: ,
,} Contents Checksheet Page No.
j Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
. Equipment Environmental Qualification Sum: nary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3b,'h., Od 3a,
's.
^ ;f j System Consideration Review - A ?;-4d, b, i EIuipment Environmental Qualification Review Se, 55, ~;, 53, 50, 5f, ,
4 , Ih, Si, Si y Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ja, Ib Equipment Summary s
.. ~
,', Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary -s, 7b, % i i
]
2 - a
4 NRC Contraet No. NRC43-73-118 Pag 9
'dllU Frank!:n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 i A Dios.on of The Frar.ht.n Instrute FRC Ass!gnment No.13 lb 20:h ed Rue Streets. PNa . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. MM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: i L Tne Licensee (has/h: a s t) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ~ environmental service conditions.
.; The Licensee has presented information which shows thirre are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
_ 1 The Licensee (has/W et) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
. item whose qualification has not been fully astablished.
Y Justification
- rim operation (has/h: not) been provided by the Licensee for ( ,_ Apment- item.
1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: _ 1 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment _ .: c : n . Equipment modification - Equipment celocation above submergence level- c r 2 _ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source' a Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress _x._ Other (hume-A75m AHff rM6M7 cM.- GewG ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item I, that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. .
~
X The Licensee (t.ae/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective
' ~
action .) l The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) -
, I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency T.h Modification III.a Exempt
< M -Qualification Not Establishh III.b Not in Scope
- i. 3- II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available -
e- .
. M m~ ~
v -
NPC Contract No. NRC-03 73-198 Page A[FrankEn bO Rewarch Center FAC Preject No. C5257 A Dw.on of The NnV:n Invue FRC Astignrnont No.13 2 20'h and Race Strem. PSca Pa. 19103 (215) 44S 1000 FRC Task No. #-6 G t EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM ((0. fd ,
~i '
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATICN: y X = DEFICIENCY
- NRC REQUIREMENTS l
- Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate __ X ,
Mequate Similarity Betwen Equipment and Test Specimen Established
! Aging Degradation Evaluated. Adequately i Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Estaclished (If Required)
'j --
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation 1 Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate _ o Peak Pressure Adequate l o Duration Adequate i o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately
- o Steas Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding~ Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + runction Time) Satisfied -
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
' DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CAMRY I.a Equip:nint Qualified - I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X. II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfiec All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
. III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available O
4 e a O
NRC Contract Ho. NRC43 4118 Nf5ank!!n Res,uch Cantor FRC Prelect No. C5257 Pace A ci:s.enci.% nertnntumue FRC As:Ianment No.13 3a 20:3.,a bce see.is. rh. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-l @ 0 FRC Task No. 44G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. m I, ICE!$SEE RESPONSE 'IQ NRC SER
. Y Qualified [l4] s Qualification Assessment On-Going
- To be Replaced by a Qualified Cceponent Rev. Cate: sort? 7. ?992 l mine mile point untt 1
, C .=:orent Review $stnary Sheet J2uiscent: Cry. ell pressure transsttter 201.2-475 4 0 g Manufacturer: sosemunt
.ccel:
1151 CP i
!afety Function: atactor scras, devell isolation. cutainent spray. core spray. auto desress -
i cualificatten Ciscre ancy: Lack of qualification data -
- Justification for Continued Operation:
The transeitters conttor drywell pressure and inttf ate protective action on nign orp ell pressure condition. As a result of a hign energy line treat or i less of c:olant accteent, inttf ation of protective actton occars witnin a l snort time of the event. The transmitter.s wi'1 have perfer ed their inte u:eo
- safety function tefore being suojected to sutstantial aaverse eavtremental
- editions.
Potentf at failwe of these trarsmitters sunseti.ent to performing their intenseo function .oald not acuersely affect accleest att yation. Based-on the aceve. c:ntinuet; c:eration is justified until the traessttters are cualtf tee or replaced witn a doenntes cualtf ted transmitters. f I I
,[e C . .
- i 3.
s o 0 d
I
& NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03-7!'118 Pagy C ranklin Research Cantes- FRG Proje':t No. C5257
} Aow t N na e lm w s ,
FRC Assignment No.13 3b j 20:h and Race irr.cs. PMa.. Pa.1W4 (215) 443 tono FRC Task No. %Co EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFiCATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Jo - i LICDISEE RESICNSE TO NRC SER (Continued) 1'
\
NOTTS Usto IN RIV!SICN 4 {33] i scT3 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCC .vedel .i No.'s 8300 364F and 9303 361YT.
. soTE 2 Y cualification assessment ongoing, e
lacTI 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiatiers dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicables assess =ent ongoing. J mote 5 ie ecmponents: not subject to thermal or Alt metal (degradation at the specified levels. radiatica NOf2 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be i substantiated. . NOTE 7 _ Further equipment identification needed to assure applicability of test report. 30:2 6 _The 510 CU Trip /Calibratica system is insensitive to pressure changes a pressure qualification test ts not considered necessary (R.MT-Rpt 12770, Revisien A). i
- O s' O
6 NPC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Al$Irran'<tn Research Ce. iter
!j FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Frank!!n Instaute FRC A3signment No.13 lo t
Mh and Race Streets. Phila. Pa 191011215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. %(a
-i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 31 EQUIly.ENT ITEM NO. 31 D/P TRANSMIITER IDCATED IN THE REACIOR BPILDING, ELEV. 237'0" ROSEMOUNT MODEL ll51DP 7E22T0003PB REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 31 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES RPS STEAM FIDW (DFT 01-26A TEROUGH H)
I LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): H-38 THROUGH H-44 [33]
- i j --
l . 4 t 4 i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) T , 71', RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS,.None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
. , Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la
- n Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
.. Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
- , Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 4 , ?+
System Consideration Review t, Ib, I;, td, t:, 'f - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review L, L, L, ~ d , L , ', f ; q 4 , 55, Si, S-
, Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation %, 55. .
Equipment Summary l Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary L, 7b, 7e l 9 ,c - y _
'i
?
eED Frank!:n Reseerch Center NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03 70-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A eMw..a ne rr.akLn :n.uuis FFC Assignment No.13 lb Sth and Race Streets. PN!a.. Pa 19103 (215) 444-1000 FRCTask No. 4 fo(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ,lTEM NO. ST , SU.tMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES *:0 THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITE5G ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (ha s/bme==ed) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipnent is . qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. '
,{ The Licensee has presented information which shows there ne no outst.nding qualification deficiencies. ,
.X_TheLicensee (has/':: n) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
4 _3, Justification for interim operation (has/Mr - 2) been provided- b the Licensee for this equipment- item. X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: __ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equip =ent relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild envircnment
- Qualification testing of equipment in rogress
. ,)(,,, Other ( CVa.1 d t c.a.Ti ow. Aue$1rnen. O n- 4o't M )
, ~J ~J
~
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
- that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. ,
I X The Licensee (pse/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency , I.b Modification III.a Exempt Q Qualification Not Established III.b !bt in Scope II,b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available -
6' . NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-73-123 3 1 brankta Research Center FRC Paject No. C5257 Page A Dtve>n of The Franktin Inetute FRC Assignmogt No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. PW . Pa. 19103(215)448-tmo FRCTask No. t % EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICA MON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 31 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIt' NATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = D2.PICIENCY
- Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Mequate Similarity Bet'Jeen Equipment and Test Speciinen Established
- Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
'~
Qualifiad Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation _ Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Requ' ed) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Eteam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation _ Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test' Sequence Satisfied . . .. l Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies - (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:
, NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified .
I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified t, III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification e III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
~
g
- e
.i
. - _ _ . _ . . _ _ . ._ _ _ -. _ . - _ - -. . _ =
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 M-118
. Pago LNfFrank!!n Rescuch Centa FRC Frefect No. CS257 A Cwon ci The henU5 !rsah.t. FRC Assignment No.13 3a r:n .naxe se,-.. Psa... Pa.19103 mil us.lom FRC Tae4 No. Mofo -
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EOUIPMENT ITEM NO. .M LICENSEE RESIONSE 'IO NRC SER X Qualified h4-) Q.talification As sessment On-Coing To be- Replaced by a- Qualified- Component-tev. 04te: a:Pll ?,191
' tine : site Delet Unit !
C:rcenent tevie.-! c.ary $3est [quiprent: Main stes.s flos differential pressure transmitter 01-25 a.M wanufacturer: Rosam unt weel: 1151 '/
~ ~
3afety Function: Main steam Ifne isolation on hi;n stets line flew Ovalification Discre:ancy: Lact of cualtffcation data Justification for Continued Caeration: . The transmitters montter main stes.s Itne ficw and initiate protective action ~ on hign +ain state 1tne flow ccadition. As a result of a nign energy tire break or loss of c:otant accident. Initf ation of protective action occurs ettnin a snort time of the event. The transmittees .111 have serformed tnetr intended safety function tefore betag suejected to suestantial adverse - environmenta' :enditions. , 1 Potential fatture of these transmitters suesevent :o performing their intended function =culd not aCverself affect accident sitigation. Based on the abov'e continued coeration is Justified until the transmitters are cualified or restaced witn a coccented qualified transmtters. , l, e
--__-.e s- , - , - - n-t w y ++e , - = , ,. --4 , - - , , <,--,,-,-y
. Q. ;__ NRC Centract No. NRC-03-73-118 Zd Franklin Research Canter FRC Pr: Ject No. CS257 Page
. A D%n of De Bank!:n Ins:t.de FRC Assignment No.13 3h Sh and Race Saeets. Na.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448a000 FRC Task No. 466
~
EQUIPMENT ENV'SONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO.@1 s LICriSEE RESpCNSE T NRC SER (Continued) NC !s esED IN PrJTSICN
, 4 {3$]
e_ NOM 1 Test specimens in Ref erences 25 and 26 were ASCO .M: del No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YT. 50= 2 N Cualification assessment ongoing, scT3 3 Equipment was tested sucesssfully te a higher radiation dose than enat derived by engineering analysis. NOT3 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicable; assass=ent' ongoing. 50T3 5 All metallic cceponents; not, subject to therms 1 or radiatien degradation at the specified levels. NOT3 6 Equip =ent will be replaced if qualification cannot be i substantiated. - NOT3 7 Further equipment identification needed to assure applicability of test report. NC-E 8 The 510 OU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to pressure changes; a pressure qualificatica test ts not considered necessary (KMT-?pt 12770, Revisien A). t
'i O
e e
{ . - - . .- _ pEFrank!!n Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 1,L FRC Project No. C5257 Page A o<vwn of The traen !c.cwe FRC Assignment No.13 " lo.
"Oth and Race Snem Phda.. Pa 191011215)443-10 @ FRC Task No. _,_ 4 fJ b _..
EQUIPMENT ENV!RONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.J_& . d EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 32 I TEMPERATURE ELEMENT LOCATED IN THE EMERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLATION VALVE CUBICLE, ELEV 281' 0"
. MINCO NICKEL, MODEL NOT STATED
, REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 FOURS
. TER CHECKSHEET NO. 32 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED i FUNCTION (PLANT ID): EMEGENCY CONDENSER RETURN LINE BREAK DETECTION
^
(TE I306-13, -14, ~23, -24)
. LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): M-5 TEROUGH M-8 (33]
i i a 4-DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM fS) ONLYI (See Section 3 of this TER fo:' Legend) , R,T,yr,RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: , Contents Checksheet Page No.
; Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, S L, , L, ;a-
~
System ' Consideration Review I., IL, L, 40, L, 4I-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, 50, Id, L, O f ,- , 4 -5 5 , Oh, 31, Sj-t Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 62, 55 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 2 , Th. M- . fB
. . . . . ,, se == =m, a
_ . . . . . . . _ . . _ .. ., . . _ m - . ....-..; 4 NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03-70-118 Page ECJ Franklin Research Center FRC Prcject No. C5257 A D;ms.cn of W Tras!:n Inst % e FRC Assignrnent No.13 lb 20th and Race Sneets. FMa., k a 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(ofp EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32 St19ARY CF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/hree-sent) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that. the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ~ i environmental service conditions. j The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
.. outstanding qualification deficiencies.
X The Licensee (has/5 - r) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interi;n operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for'this equipment item. I 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification ~ Equipment relocation above submergence level , Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment - _ , Qualification testing of equipment in progress
,2L Other ( Qual dlC.R4*t e n ksessment ON oi n9 )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. X The Licensee (murr/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective { , action .) gi The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
~
~
+
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ,
I.a Qualified II.'c Qualified Life Det aciency I.b Modification III.a Exempt
@ Qualification Not Estab ished III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available .
s e g %s-
4'% in'!.J Frank!!n Resarch Center NRC Centract No. N RC-03-73-128 FRC Freject No. CS257 Page A c ouon of Th Frank!tn bsmie FRC As !gnment No.13 2 FJih .nd R.ce Sants. PMs.. Pa. 19103(215) 449-1 7 4 FRC Task No. 4fcfo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32- , t _ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLHMARY FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS _ X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate M , Adequate Si:nilarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' Aging regradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established te Identify Aging Degradatien -- Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately a o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate criteria Pegarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Sub:ne'rgence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation . Satisfied Cri.teria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified .
. I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification ! II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified 1 III.a Equipment Exeanpt Frora Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review ; IV Documentation Not Made Available t.
w a m
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-74-118 Ub. ju Fc nk!!n Resezrth Canter Page FRC Prclect No. C5257 A Di um cf The Fanun faswa FRC Assignment No.13 30 3 2Cth and Race Suws. r7.24.. Ps.191031211) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 cog j EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32- , 4 4 LIGSEE RESPONSE tt3 NRC SER 1
; Q2alified -
X qualificacion Assessment On-Coing 9 Td be$ Replaced by a Qualified C:sponene -- t s .
'"*k i NOTTS USED IN Rr/ISICN 4 {3"j]
~
strat 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were Asco Model No.'s 8300 364F and 9300 361YF. - NOTE 2 X Cualification assessment ongoing. NOTE 3 _ Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
. 5072 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as' applicable; assessment engoing.
Nors 5 All metallic ec=ponents: not subject to thermal or
. radiation degradation at the specified levels.
u r NCrfs 6 Equip =ent will be replaced if qualification cannot be
. substantiated. -
. NOT3 7 , Further equipment identification needed to assure _,
applicability of test report.
-- SCr:3 S The 510 OU Trip /Calibratien Systes is insenaitise to pressure changes; a pressure qualif'eatien test is not censidered necessary (TeT-Rpt 12773, Revision A).
] .
O
e. NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 U$.;,Franklin
- Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A Dws.on of m r, aran Institue FRC Assignment No.13 lc
.Sh and Race $!reets. Pha.. Pa 19!011215) 448-10:10 FRC Task No 4 Llo
. EQUlFMENT ENVIRCNMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33
'l EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 33 l PRESSURE SWITCH LOCATED IN THE REACIOR BUILDING, ELEV. 281'0" l MERCOID MODEL SD8136 SERIES L5432R21E
, REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR l
TER CEECKSHEET No. 33
, LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT SIAAY LOW PRESSURE ALARM (PS 80-61, -60)
LICENSEE SUBMITIAL: SCEW(S): N-9, N-10 (33] 3 . l -
.s
- a ... i i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, @', RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, , g Not stated, Not applicable I l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: , 0
. I Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
. Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, ?c, 2d System Consideration Review Ah 4- ' -
, . 42 '#, .-, "f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52 Eh "c. S', h, If, 5;. 5% *i, Si Installed ~11 Lessons Learned Implementation h, 55 Equipment .2ummary Maintenance anc Replacemenc Schedule Summary 72, '* 'c-e
Q,,u NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-198 FRC Project No. C5257 . age IJ Franktn Research Center. A Dw on of ne narnalnswe FRC Assignment No.13 - lb 20th and Race Strem. PMa.. Pe 19103(215) 448-1:00 FRC Task No. 466
- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E A
4
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
.' X_ Tne Licensee (has/h:: ..c, t) provided a response to the SER cone ns.
- s The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE '
environmental service conditions.
. The Licensee has presented infor=ation which shows there are no
] outstanding qualification deficiencies.
J X The Licensee (has/'ar :ct) proposed a corrective action for this equipment I item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.
,,,,2(, Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equipment replacement with qualified equipment . 1.
_ Equipment modification. .- . Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress
.)(,, Other (GyA/jsinries ArcesrMsgr cN.Gosm )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
* - . operation.
- 4 X The Licensee (has./has not) provided a schedole for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
- The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) .
I.a Cualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
. I.b Modification III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope Qualification Not Established Documentation Hot Available II.b Not Qualified IV ,
8 s _ . t 7 - t l'
43 NRC Centract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5057 Page kiiU? rank!!n Reuuch Center A oim,on oi The rr.num imwe FRC Assignrnent No.13. 2
- ns .nd R.<. str ,1 rsca.. Pa.19:43 (215) 44310no FRC Task No. %$
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.13. . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATICN: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMEN':s Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate . X __ . Adequate Similarity Between Equip:nent and Test Specimen Established ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately 4 Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) ~ Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding .adiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied ~
. Criteria Ragarding Functional Testing Satisfied _
Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function. Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
' DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY ( I.a Equipment Qualified
, I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established Y II.D Equipment Not Qualified .
II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification _
. III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available e
e a
6- NRC Contract No. N RC43J?-118 FRC Frefect No. C5:57 Face branki n Reunch Cen:er
; A cwen d ne rmkan t . -tuve FFC A::ignment No.13 3a 00:h and Rxe Sems. FNa.. Fa. 19:03 (215) 4(s.I000 FRC Task No. 4fo(o I
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICAT1CN REVIEW OF ECulPMENT ITEM NO.1) , 1 LICENSEE RESPCNSE ' 0 NRC SER Qualified - V Qualification As sessment On-Going To be Replaced by a Qualified Cceponent --
} -
NOTES USED IN REVISICN 4 33] Ntml 1 Test specimens in Ref erences 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s $300 364F and 9300 361YF. , s sot 2 cualification assess =ent ongoing. X_ 3073 3 Iquipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dese than that derived by engineering analysis. 1 NOT 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as. applicable; assessment ongoing. NCPT 5 All metallic ec=ponents not subject to thermal or
.3 j
radiatien degradation at the specified levela. MCr13 6 Iquipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be
, substantiated.
NOT3 7 , Turther equipment identification needed to assure - applicability of test report. NoT3 S The 510 OU Trip /Calibr atien ~,yste s is insensitive to pressure changes a pressurw qualificatien test is not censidered necessary (KM;-Apt 12770, Revision A). . e MIM M P' E ' m I'M E
3 4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 FiIC Project No. C5257 Pags NL"JIrank!!n Research Center lc A Des.onof The nanun inst.Nte FFC Assignment No.13
. 20th and Rue Streets. Phda.. Pt 19103(2:51448 1 M FRC Task No. %k .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1Y. . EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 34 PRESSURE SWITCH LOCATED IN THE REAcr0R BUILDING, ELEV. 281'0"
, MERCOID MODEL DAS432 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS ~
TER CHECKSHEET NO. 34
. LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CORE SPRAY PRESSURE ALARM (PS. 40-80, -07) .
LICENSEE SUBMITTA7.: SCEW(S): F-7, F-8 [33] j __ - 1 - DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, Rr, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, , Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHEX'KSHEETS: .
* ' Checksheet Page No.
s Contents
- Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sur:rnary Forms 2
-1 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, h, ?d
" 7. -
System Consideration Review h. Ib, I;, IS, tu, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5. * * ** %. 56 , 5;, Ih, Si, ?i Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 4- % Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary S,7 'e , 6
. _ .. . . . . . .k s
NRC Contract No. N RC-03-73-118 4'WJFrank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 F808
, A o w.cn u m nanu.ntne u e FRC Assignrnent No.13 lb rhd Rue S:rms. FMa . Fa 19103 CIS) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 466 EQUIPMENT ENVIRC.'4 MENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JS.
Sild. MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: t
! 1 Tne I.icensee (ba s/ m>-*et) provided a response to the SER concerns.
The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE
~
environmental service conditions. 7
-j The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no j outstanding qualification deficiencies.
1 The Licensee (has/h : c.s t ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment ites whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. Y Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment .- Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation sourch __,,, verify qualification by additienal (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild enviroment - Qualification testing of equipment in progress 1 0ther (duA L />:~)r4 Dey AMFf.s~ MEW 7~ nN- G0/W6 ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item j that can be con' s trued as a basis for justification for interim 1 operation.
, Y The Licensee (w/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
-l l The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
i DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIDi
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) , .; Ia Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope ;
II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available , l l
-1
t A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 73-118 Pago NJ5nk!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A oi-w ne rianas himue FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Sw.es. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44r,1000 FRC Task No. 464 __ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M. .
! _ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QGALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATICN: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = CEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate 1 *
- Adequate Similarity Between Equip:nent and Test Specimen Established ~
l Aging Dagradation Evaluated Adequately _
- Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Progr.r.m Established to Identify Aging Degradation - Criteria Pegarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate
)
. o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate criteria Regarding Spray satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Crit 3ria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Ancmalies (If Any) Satisfiedr Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Curation Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied -
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:
'l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified .
I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipoent Qualification Not Established Y II.D Equipment Not Qualified
- i II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
. III.a Equipment Exeinpt Frora Qualification III.o Equipment 130t in the Scope of the Qualification Review
! IV Documentation Not Made Available O D e
e 9 4
- us.
g4 p e- g 64 -
A NRC Centract No. NRC-03-73-118 Page UW.ITrankEn Researth C<nter FRC Prebct No. C5257
. A cwo, e4 7he Frarks trsaure FRC Assignment No.13 3a M:h and Rue Strutt. rics-. Pa. 191034211) 443-1 2 0 FRC Task No. 4GG
{ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J_1 , 4 LICENSEE RESpCNSE ':0 NRC SER 3 i Qualified - X Qualification Assess =ent On-Coing j To be Replaced by a Qualified C:sponenc __
-I a
; NcT!S USED Dr Rr/tstcN 4
{33] ., ; NOTE 1 Test speci= ens in References 25 and 26 were ASCC Model No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YF. , ECTE 2 X Cualification assess =ent ongoing. acte 3 - Equipent was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as. applicabler assessment cr. going. NOTE 5 All setallic ce=ponents: not subject to ther:nal or radiation degradation at the specified levels. NOTE 6 Equipent will be replaced if qualification cannot be 3 ., substantiated. NOTE 7. Further equipent identification needed to assure - applicability of test report. NOTE S The 510 CU Trip / calibration Sys:e:s is insensitive to pressure char:ges t a pressure qualification test is nct considered necessary (v.T-Rpt 12770, Revision A). e i J
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 MFranMin Research Centu FRC Project No. C5257 P 98 A Dms.on ot he framRn tawe FRC Aesignment No.13 11, 2m8 aad nx. ser ,,, . Ph,:a.. Fa 19103 GBl m 1DW FRC Task No. 4 (. (, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1T__ EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 35 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE RMCTOR BUILDING, ELEV. 281'0" ROSEMOUNT MODEL ll51DP REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR
, TER CHECKSHEET No. 35 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRIPS TURBINE STOP VALVES (LT 36-03A, B, C, C)
- LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCIW(S): G-4 THROUCH C-7 [33]
LICENSEE SUBMITIAL: SCEW(S): C-6 [33]
. FUNCIION (PLANT ID): MEASURES LOW-LCW REACIDR LEVEL TO RPS (LT 36-04A, B, C,
; D; 36-05A, B, C, D) --
LICENSEE SUEMITIAL: SCEW(S): G-8 THROUGH G-15 [33] t DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY1 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
- T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: ,
Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sum: nary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sur: mary Forns 2 ~
. Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration Review '- ^ *, IJ, ?c, Of -
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sc Cb, M " %. Sf, 5;, 55, Ei, Ej Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6ar-Gb Equipment Summary . Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary b, 7L, b 9 e - . = m~ '- t.m--y .--, s --ye e e -- -- r w 4 .m7 ,--v- ,rv,- -r m
. . . . - . .. - s. .. . . . . . . . . .w-1 0
) 4du Frankhn Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 i! .. f FRC Project No. CS257 Page
-j A Dinsson of The Tranktts insetuis FRC Assignment No.13 lb 4 '0 h and Race Snees. PMa.. Pa 19103 (215) 4481m0 FRC Task No. _W G '
~
-] EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J_t , ,
7 .i -
\ '*1 .:
.q
.s
- - 'j. .
SU:4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 4 j .X_ Tne Licensee (has/L .~i.) provided a response to the SER concerns. t *: i j The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is ' . i i-qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service donditions.
~
'c.
-] The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no f outstanding qualificacion deficiencies.
i X The Licensee (has/* - -^t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment ' l ! item whose qualification has not been fully established.
-l i
i X Justification for interim operation (has/ W --O been provided by the . Licensee for this equipment- ites. . i j
. e X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: _ _. ,
- a . -
, . X Equipment replacement with qudlified equipment . '~ w- : j ;; Equipment modification: - . 1
. Equipment relocation above submergence level - -
, - Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source j Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) 9 Equipment relocation to a mild environment , ,
,' -] Qualification testing of equipment in progress
-oi _X,, Other (dtMuswAnm nwsixsur M- mwMe,- )
S$ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
.M that can be construed as a basis for justification for' interim operation.
, ;. Y The Licensee (n+e/has not) provided a schedule' for the ' proposed
.. corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
-y,.
action .) r
.s i, The Licusee states that the equipment. item does not require qualification
.l
'j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
"; j DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITD4 ONLY: -(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
{ .
'.I I.a Qualified. II.c Qualified Life Deficiency 0 I.b Modificat h III.a Exempt .
.h huualifiNtion Not Established) III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualifleo IV Documentation Not Available .
1
..y
.i, i n' .
- I *h1.-_- ,
_ c . . / , . ,, _ , - _ _ _ , - _ _ - , . . . _ . . .-.. _ . - _ , . - _ _ . __ _m. -
Q~ UNJ Franklin Research Center NRC Contr:ic? No. NRC-0MS-118 Page FRC Project No. C5:57 A ow,on om. FrankIn !nsntwre. FAC Assignrnent No.13 2. 20th ard Rue St e.is. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 466'
~ ~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NG. JE , EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMFARY FORM DESIGNATION: F9C REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X_ , Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Dagradation Evaluated Mequately ' Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation -- Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate , o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies . (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional' Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY a I.a Equipment Qualified . I.b Equipment Qualificacion Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established m II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
- h III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review 1 IV Documentation Not Made Available
-t O
e b 9
P
. !1 A NRC Centract No. NRC-CG1S S Page
) CE=nklin Remich Center FRC Project No. C5257 A DWees d U s In Mn lns Me FRC Assignment No.13 3a 5:h and Rxe St:ecs. F%:. Fa. 19103 :215) us tooo FFiC Task No. 46G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JS_
E _LICriSEE REMCMSE 'IO NRC SER i X Qualified (14) - 4' Qualification As'sesstsent On-Going To be Replaced by a Qualified Caponent 1
*4
. 4, i
tev. Oata: Acril 2. ?i3
- sire Mile point Unit 1 C:rconent Review hmary Sheet huirrent: React:r pressure transmitter 36-05 A-0 I i Fanufacturer: Assenount - -' -
we gel: 11$1 Op . Safety Function: Auto decressuritation eita higy crp. ell pressure Qualification Discre:ancy: Lack of cualification data Justificatica for C ntinued cceration: The trarsmitters monitor reacter vessel level and initiate protective action . on 1cw reactor vessel level c:ndition. As a result of a Nigi energy line treak or loss of c001 ant aCCicent, initiation of ;rotective action occurs
=1tnin a snort time of the event. The trarsattters will have erfor ec t.*.eir
+
inteades saf ety function before bei .g subjected to substantial adverse envirenrental c0nditions.
- Potential f a!'s.re of !?tse transmitters subsecuent te gederm19g their intenced functica sould not acversely affect ac 1 cent sitigation.
fased ca :ne aeove centinued ::eratica is justifies sett! tie trans.M tters.
, are cuallfied cr replaced =lta a ace.eeetec :ualified trarsmitters.
I 3 i 1 - a
A N RC Contract No. NRC-03-7E-118 UdFranidin Research Center FRC Project No. C'257 Pags A ::w,on ei The rrarw rneuse FRC Acelgnment No.13 3b
.T25 and R ca Sbe u. Nea.. Pa.19103 G151443-Im3 FAC Task Nos_ 446 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. lf j f
LICEISEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER X Qualified (143 i . Qualification Assessment ca.-Caing
$ To be Replaced by a ' Qualified Cc::ponent ' '
g 1 Rev. Sate: scril 7.1H2 vine xile reint unit - Cen : cent teview $ r ary Sheet (cuit v t: Reactor atte level *ra-11 titter 210340 wanufacturer Resecount _ .2
.edel w
1151 r# Safety furction: initiates reactor scram and turtine st:o valve closure on low level and tartine st:3 valve closure on nign vessel level Cualification Discrepancy: t,ack of qualification data Justification for Contint.ed Operation: The transmitters -enitor reacter water level and initiate reactor scrah anc/or '( tartine step valve elesure for off norral conditions. As a result of a ntgn energy line trese or loss of c:olant accident. Initiation of protective action
- will occur eitMin a sacrt tire of the event. The transmitters will Mave 4
perfor ed tseir intended safety function tefore being sucjected to suestantial adverse envirormental conditions.
~ Potential failure of these transmitters subsequent to perferming tseir latenced function -ould not aeve*sely affect accicent mitigation. .
Based on the above, continues caeration is justified until tse transmitters are tualifies or replaced with a doennted cualified transmitters. 5 mm O
-%- 6 e *
~~
.,_ -~-St-- ' ' " ' ' " ' ' " * '
i & NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118
. .!1 ST) FranMin Research Center FRC Freject No. C5257 Page A es.non a w rrarktn rnerure FRC Acelgnment No.13 3c
. nh and a.ca str.ets r5de.. Pa.19103 c5) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _ r'*4 G e
t
] 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JS
'b A
i LI N SEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
}:
X_ Qualified h43
, ,8 Quali ICation As.sess:::ent On-Going ,
To be Replaced by a Qualified Ccciponent
-a ,
i . i i Rev. Oate: acP11 2. 1982
.line Mile Point Unit 1 C:r;orent Review se- ary Sheet (sut; ment: Reactor =ater level transsitter 35.ca A-D
- Manufacturer: Rosemount
* *odel:
. 1151 GP - - ; _
, Safety Function: activates core and dentaireent spray pumos, isolates main _
steam line, cleanup. shutdewn cooling eent and ;urse. . - - surgs and trips rectre. 10o05 5 Qualification Discrepancyt lack of qualification data 8 Justification for Continued Caeration:
't De transmitters monit0r reactor w4ter level and (Mitiate protective action on -
.i Ice-low reacter coolant level condition. As a result of a hign energy line 1 treak or Its: of coolant accicent. initiation of protective action oc:urs
.. within a snort time of the event. ne transmitters stil have ser*: reed tretr intenced safety function before being suojected to suostantial adverse i
... environmental conditions.
Potential failure of these transmitters subsecuent to perforiing their intenced function would ut acversely affect accident sitigation.
, ..j
- .. .e on t.se soeve, c:ntinued coeration is :vstif tee untti >. tra-smitters
' are avalified or replaced =ith a cocwented qualified transmitters. -
.4 i
- s b
-a
*et e f
e A 4 D
*h, , a ,, - - - - - -. ., ,- ,-, , ,,
NRC Centract No. NRC-03-TJ-118
!I 4)Ifranklin Research Center FRC? reject No. C5257, Pacoa A cim.m or n. Freen initwe FRC Au!qnment No.13 mh .nd Race Seruts. Phca,. Pa.19103 m 5) 481000 3d FRC Task No. Mo(D EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. LC -
LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued) NOTES USED IN PTITSICN t 4 [351 , so;3 1 Test speci.sens in Ref erences 25 and 26 were Asco .vedel
~
No,'s 8300 364F and 33C3 361YF. l scT3 2 X _ Cualification assessment ongoing, l l Ecr3 3 _ Equipment was tested successfully, to a 6.igher radiatior-. dose than that derived by engineering analysis. l ! I NOTE 4 Insulation quali*1 cation per References 46 or 47 as applicabler assesscent ongoing. ucTs 5 All metallic components: not subject to thermal or radiatica degradation at the'specified levels. Not"2 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be j i substantiated. - B0 2 7 Further equipment identificatien needed to assur<s applicability of test report. . 5073 S The 510 CU Trip / Calibration Systers is insensitive to pressure changest a pressure qualification test Ls not , j considered necessary (MT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). , l I
,e
.l me e
e 9 e
NPC Contract No. NRC-43-79-118 nkhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 I"Q*
'i A Div w iof N Fraa'an!mtitute FRC Aesfqnment No.13 Ia j m and Rue %ee s. Phi'a . Pa 19103 Q15) 4481000 FRC Task No. 4Gb
! F.QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _%
-t EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 36 t LEVEL TRANSMITTER IDCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING, ELLV.198'0" ROSD!OUNT MODEL ll51DP REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS TER CHECKSEEET NO. 36
~-i LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES TORUS WATER LEVEL (LT 58-05, -06)
LICENSEE SUEMITTAL: SCEW(S): F-9, F-10 [33] .
. .{ __
^1 I
I DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY
~
(See Section 3 of this TER for 1,egend) - R, T, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable l LISTING OF APPLICA3LE CHECKSHEETS:
,. Contents Checksheet Pace No, t .
Equipment Item la . 1 Summary of Licensee Responses to the N
- SER lb )
Equipment Ervironmental Qualification Sum: nary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER ?:, ?b, 2, ?d System Consideration Rev!Sw tc , Ib, Oc, Id, !;, !f - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5= Sk C '- "A, 5, 5 f, 5,0 55, Si, Sj - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation &a r -4b , Equipment Su:= nary 4
? Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 72 't, 7;-
=l l
4 NRC Contract No. NRC43J3-118 ddf Frankhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A cNmen a TN rranun Inusute . FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 19103 (215) 444-1r* FRC Task No. #/l,I
! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.13 -
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES M THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: _g,Tne Licensee (has/hW) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is , i
. qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE '
l environmental service conditions. I j The Licensee has presented infor.:ation which shows there-ere no 1 outstanding qualification deficiencies.
] The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment i item whose qualification has not been fully established.
1 3 Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item, i l l Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment. Equipment modification w-Equipment relocation above sub.nergence level aelocate or shield equipment fro:n radiation source
~
Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment - l Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item ! l that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
; operation.
i l
) The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed l .
corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the ccerective action .)
- ?
"I I The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
1 ' DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW 3,. - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) _ 1 c' I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
, I.b Modification l III.a Exempt j II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.D Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available .
6 *
- O
(' I D' NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 Pege d5Jh ranklin Research Center FRC Prclect No.C5257 A Den olm Ftankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2
.j , 20:h and Race Streets. Ph!!a . Pa.19103 (215) 448- 1000 FRC Task No. W(
..t
-l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .Jfr 1
t EQUIPMENT E:'. IRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION SL . MARY FORM s DESIGNATION: 4 X = DEFICIENCY j NRC REQUIREMENTS
^
Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate -
', Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ~
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately d Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
< Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation _ .
Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
' o Peak Temperature Adequate
- o Peak Pressure Adequate
' o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o ' Steam 'hposure (If Required) Adeq2 ate i .
Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding. Submergence Satis'ied l .,
' Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ~ . .a . 1 Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied -
Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies t (If Any) Satisfied e Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
. ! Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied , _
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
.i DESIGNATION:
~l X = CATEGORY
- ..mi NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY i
^; I.a Equipment Qualified '
i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
"~i II.a Equipment Qual ~ification Not Established
.N II.b Equipment Not Qualified dj II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requi'rements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification X III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
. I.
O 4 a a wE~f )m xx na. Hs/ D P [0
NRC Contract No. N AC43-TJ-118 4[ULU Franklin Rewarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A owis.on of The Franktn !ns:.ruie FRC Assignment No.13- la
.%h and Race Sneets. Phita.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-10' & FRC Tesk No. 466 ,
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 37 . EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 37 CONTROL SWITCH LOCATID IN TEE REACTOR BUILDING, ELEV. 236'0" MERCOID MODEL CP4122 REQUIED OFERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 37 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TORUS VACUUM RELIEF VALVE CONTROL (VCS 68-llA, B;
- 68-12A, B; 68-13A, B)
- LICENSEE SUBMITIAL: SCEW(S): E-17 THROUGH E-22..[33]
i
. = _ _ _
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER Tor Legend) R, T, Or, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, 0)(, RPN , EXN , SEN, RPS, None, I Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: , Contents Checksheet Page No.
. 3
; Equipment Item la 1
Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
~
Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Pesponse to NRC SER 3a, 2b, 20, 2d
~
42 45, !:, *d, !c, if System Consideration Review Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52 55, 50, ?d, ?w --54, ~ 50, Sh, 51, Oj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation k, S Equipment Summary . . Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h , 7L, % .. 9 e
+.a W g
=-
. . . . . _ _. ._ c. . . _ . . , . . .
' I.i Q- NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page 1 00$IJ Frank!!n Resemich Center FRC Project No. CS2W '
A DMen of Th Frankhn Ins:Pvte FRC Assignrnent No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Pht!a.. Pa. 10103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4164
- d-2 d~4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.JZ..
.?
1 * #
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES '1O THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEw.S ARE APPLICABLE: i X Tne Licensee (has/'~ ") provided 'a response to the SER concerns. , .~}
~l j The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is I
- j. qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
i [" The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
~71. .
j 1 The Licensee (has/h:2 ::t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
; item whose qualification has not been fully established.
Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item.
. i
[ 2(_ Corrective action specified by the Licensee: . . . i 4:, I . ., . Equipment replacement with qualified equipment:. _ Equipment modification
' ' - ~'
Equipment relocation above subraergence level . l' Relocate or shir.ld equipment from radiation source ..
- q verify qualification by ' additional (testing / analysis) i Equipment relocation to a mild environment , ,
I . Qualification testing of equipment in progress
,?
L Other (&ini):~ti- o rim Arw11Mur es-anwa ) ) i The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
~! that can be construed as a basis for justification for interia j operation.
4 ui
; _](,,The Licensee (hae/has not) provided a schedule for the ' proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
d I. i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
-' and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC-CUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW. j - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) N' I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency 0 I.b Modification III.a Exempt . III.b Not.in Scope 1.j Q Qualification Not Established Documentation Not Available II.b Not Qualified IV -
- ,T - .- .- - .,- ,,
Q_ ,,_ NRC Contract No. NRCC-4118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page U$U Frank!!n Research Center A civ.s.on of Th. Fr.nkna inst.we FRC Assignment No.13 2 x h and Race Snees. FM.a.. Pa. 19103 (215) t t!-ING FRC Task No. #44 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.JZ. , 3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SIMMARY FORM DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of ' Qualification Adequate X , Adequate Similarity Betieen Equipment and Test Specimen Established. ' j Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Kaplacement Schedule Established (If Required) ~ Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY Equipment Qualified I.a
.' I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y_
II.a Equipcent Qualificatia. Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified , II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life - or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available O 9 e
'O e
. O d
i _ NPC Centract No. NRC-C3-79-118 6.h[ Ul Franklin Re-aarth Center FRC Project No. CS257 Pace i A cw.a et 7he rvenan tr ende FRC Assignment No.13 3a 3% and Race Strecs. Phas., Ps. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 4% it
~i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUAUF1 CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JJ. ,
u ; 1 t LINSEE RESpCNSE 'IO NRC SER
.]
.t i
1
.}
q. Qualified - l 1 Qualifir ation Assessment M-Coing To be Ecplaced by a Q2alified Ccuponent -- 0 41 f
' ^
. NO M USED IN REVISICN 4, 3*j] _ _7 ,, .-
],
NOU 1 Test specimens in P.eferences 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YF. . i . i so:E 2 1 Cualification assess =ent ongoing. 4 i ~
- mors 3 . Equipment was tested'successfully to a higher radiation
() dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
.i.
. NorE 4 Insulation qualification per References 4 6 or 47' as-
~t applicablet assess =ent cr. going.
l MCTFE $ All metallic cc=ponentst not subject to thermal or j radiatica degradation at the specified levels. NCrf3 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be j . substantiated.
- NCrf3 7 , Further equipment identification needed to assure ,
. appilcamility of test report.
?
. NOTE S The 510 00 Trip /Calibratien sys:em is insensitise to 1
pressure changes: a pressure qualification test is not corsidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A). S e O .
.i . 1 i
i - I A NRC Centract No. NRC-03-73-118
$hNnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A Dkwn of The Trank!in Inst:!ute FRC Assignment No.13 Ia 2^:h and Race Streers. P5da Pa.19103 (215) 443-lM) FHC Task No. 4hb EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E *
*i ,
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 38 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE REACIOR BUILDING, ELEV. 281'0" ! CENERAL EIECTRIC MODEL 553 H3345619079 i 1 HOtit REQUIRED OPERAING TIME: TER CEECKSEEET No. 38 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED [, FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REACTOR LEVEL MEASUREMENT (LT IA-12)
- LICENSEE' SU3MITTAI4 SCZW(S): G-16 [33]
i t DESICIATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, , Not stated, Noe applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CtECKSHEETS: ,
,- Contents Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la Su= mary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
! Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 35, ?c, ?4
' ~
System Consideration Review 42 Ak 4" M, 'r, ?f l-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 9 Sh- 9 r' - ** % M, ,
, %: *h *i, 52 l
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation na, frb
. Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Senedule Summary a, 7b, 7; g
x NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page
-; A DMs.on of The FranLLn In<ttuis FRC Assignment No.13 lb j 20:h and Race 5t:eets Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481NO FRC Task No. 466 e
.}
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QOAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.J_P_. H
'i
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICAELE:
~
} X Tne Licensee (has/c :: no t) provided a response to the SER concerns.
'f
'} The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is A qualifiwd and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE
~
} environmental service conditions.
.lj The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
.], outstanding qualification deficiencies.
; 1
! _g_ The Licensee (has/t: .= ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment j item whose qualification has not been fully established.
)i Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment ites.
t X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: _
.{ <
- . ~ s- .
~~
Equipment' replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield eptipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) -
; Equipment relocation-to a mild environment .
; Qualification testing of equipment in progress l L Other (?rn.ste,emext /r darL rAvesr M rw andavra rna )
- )
; The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
,'j that can be construed as .a basis for justification for interim 1 operation.
~!
_2g, The Licensee (aw/has not) provided a schedule for the ' proposed
~
I ! corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
] action .)
" _. 3
.he Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification 7 and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
f DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW M fl - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
*j I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
..j Q Mxlification III.a Exempt .
- e. II.a Qualification Not Established III.b lbt in Scope
-! II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available 7;:
'J -
i
! 6. A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-TJ-118 Page LC.fFranklin Research Center FRC Fruject No. CE257 A Dwon of Th FrarMn inst: tale FRC Ac::fgnment No.13 2
- ots .na R=. Strw ts. Ph.!a.. Pa.19L.3 c15) 4610no FRC Task No. #fd EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.2& ,
4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Docum -nted Evidence of Qualification Adequate _g___ , Adequate Similarity BetWeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established
~
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
.j Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
. Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate
, o Peak Pressure Adequate
- o Duration Adequate
, o Required Profile Enveloped, Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Ducation Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied -
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
, a I.a Equipment Qualified
. I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established
. II.D Equipment Not Qualified
.3 II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
.'j or Replacement Schedule Justified
, , ,' III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
- IV Documentation Not Made Available l
4
- ~
- 1. .
i s 9
,i
.l 4- NP.C Centract No. NP.C-03-73118
! 'JU?lFrank!?n Research Canter P8G9 FRC Frefect No. C5257 A c; - 9 m runknn re use FRC Assignment No.13 j m and Rxe St n. FMa.. Pa.19103 c11) us-two 30
. FRC Task No. _ 4(Mo e
i
. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICAT1CN REVIE'N CF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22: .
l~ LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER 4 1 Qualified - Qualificacion Assessment On-Coins i To be Replaced by a Qualified C:cponent -- No?!S USED IN REVTSICN k 3 _ ' sors 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were ASCO Model No.'s 8300 B64F and 8300 361YF. . sot: 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. 5 i
~i NOTE 3 _ Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per references 46 or 47 as. applicable; assess =ent engoing.
.*3 NOTE 5 All :netallic ecriponents; not subject to thermal or radiatica degradation at the specified levels. .
Nof3 6 . X - Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be
.. substantiated.
M0:3 7 , rurther equipment identification needed to assure applicability of test report. .
~
sors S The 510 CU Trip / Calibration Sys:em is insensitive to *
- . pressure changes; a pressure qualification test is not .
, censidered necessary (R.MT-Rpt 127:0, Revis!cn A).
e .
' D,, - NRC Centract No. N RC-03-73-118 Pfd Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Dien of Th Fra,an Instste FRC Assignment No.13 .Ia ~
' ?^th and Race Sa ets. Phca.. Pa 19103(215 M1000 FRC Task No. %fe EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATiON REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. M
~
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 - FIDW TPJLNSMITTER IDCATED IN THE 1 EACTOR BUILDING, ELEY. 237'0" ROSEh0UNT MODEL 1151DP REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS .
- TER CFECKSEEET NO. 39 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CORE SPRAY PUMP FIDW MEASUREMENT (FT RV-26A)
- SERVICE:
- LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:. SCEW(S): F-3 [33).
--. = - - ,
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I,'gM, RPN, EXN, SEN,~ RPS, None,
. Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF ' APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: ,
Contents Checksheet Page No.
. Equipment Item la
] Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
, Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, h, 2d
- System Consideration Review '5, 1c, 4d, *^
, !f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review h, '5 *% CA *^ 55,
~
*h Sj M. Si, Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation M -
Equipment Summary ' 9 Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h, 'h 'c-b l
~
i
; NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 4[dIFrank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page
; A Cwon of he T ank!'n Inst:tute FRC Ass!gnment No.13 lb.
20th and Race Str.ets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 446 .
~
~ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J_2_
SUMMARY
OF _ LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ON' L Y CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
~
d
)( Tne Licensee (has/% r ..c t) provided a response to the SER concerns. .
The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is jalified and/ will function when expor.ed to the applicable DBE environmental service c'onditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. j _X The Licensee (has/h:2 c.et) proposed a corrective action for this equipment _; . item wnose qualification has not been fully established. _X_ Justification for interim operation (has/" et) been provided by the
; Licensee for tnis equipment-item.
s
.X._ Corrective action specified by the Licensee: -
Equipment replacement with qualified equipment' e: Equipment modification " ' - Equipment relocation above submergence level - Relocate or shield equipment,from radiation source verify qualifier. tion by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress _x_ Other (duMn: seAncy Austemear cy-cowG }
,' The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
, that can be construed as a bae's for justification for interim
-- i operation.
_g_ The Licensee (hae/has not) provided a schedule ' for the ' proposed
. .i corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action
.)
1 0 The Licensee I'.ates that the equipment item does not require qualification I a and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
! DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW 3 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
!"
- I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I Ndification III.a Exempt .
1 .- I.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope 2
- II.o Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available -
s
Qu thJ Frank!In Research Center NRC Contrac2 No. N RC-03-N-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Diven c4 The FranW Indture FRC Aseignment No.13 2
. .~tt5 and Race Stree. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810n0 FRC Task No. 9G6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J.2 .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate _y , Adequate Similarity Betseen Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) ~~
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied
- Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied -
Criteria Regarding . Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Fuactional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIG' NATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established v' II.b Equipment Not Qualified
. II.c Equipmedt Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
- III.a Equipment Dcempt From Qualification Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
']
- III.D IV Documentation Not Made Available e
e
A NRC Contr.a.ct No. N RC-03-79-118 Pacs
~! UM Frank!!n Rasarch Centar FRC Project No.C5257 i
A Civun eine Frankro Inerate FRC Assignment No.13 3a
- oih ed axe seem. r5ce.. Pa.19103 mi) MS l@ FRC Task No. 446
~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J.f_ 4 McENSEE RESMNSE M NRC SER i 4
.g a 2 i ,
, _g-i I
j X Qualified D4-]_
..f Qualification Assesstrent La-Coing
. 4 To be Replaced by a Q1alified Cc=ponent _
. .'i i
Mire Milt Point Unit 1 Aev. Cate: aoril ?. 1932 3( C:r;cnent Review Saary $heet Equicment: Core spray flow transmitter 2Y-26A. 8 - . w
.anufacturert Rosegunt - --
.Mocett 115) cp .F F 75-- ~ - ,
Safety Function: :fone - - - Cualification 01screcancy: Lack of oualification data Justification for Continued Caeration: The c:re spray flow transmitters provice no c:ntrol or safety relatett ~ function. They provide flew inoication to the c:erator. Petantial failure of taese transmitters .ould not aeversely affect accicent attigation. Sased on the aoove, continuea coeration is justified. i S t a J s D 4 9
*i 4
?
_,. - ~'*
4 A NRC Contract No. NRC-C3-73-118 Page-
%C& rank!!n Research Center: FRC Project No. C5257 A civ,.on et Th. Franu:n innaut. FRC AasIgnment No.13 - 3b nn .nd Rac ser.cs. Phd... Pa. 19103(2F a 000 FRC Task No. %6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 LINSEE RESPONSE M NRC SER (Continued)
. NOMS _ CS?_D IN Rn'TSTON 4 {33]
No:3 1 ~ Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were Asco Model No.'s $300 364F and 83CQ 361YT. B0:2 2 X Cualification assessment ongoing. T.d=2w 37 Equipment was tested successfully to a higter radiatior*. dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOTS 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as applicables assesscent ongoing. poTE 5 All metallic ce=ponents: not subject to thermal or radiation degradation at the specified levels. Mof3 6 Iquip=ent will be replaced if qualification cannot be - i substantiated. BOT 2 7 Further equip =ent identification needed to assure applicability of test report. 8072 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration Syste:n is insensitive to pressure changes a pressure qualification test ts not considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A).. d O e h o
, m.e .--e e
, a NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page
[!!LL Franklin Research Center
.i A Dusen of The Fran'Jn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc I
I 20th and Race Streers. Phca.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 Inm FRC Task No. %4 i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 'f0-
' t EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 40 j FIDW TRANSMITTER I4CATED IN THE REAcr0R SUILDING, ELEY. 237'0" j ROSEMOUNT MODEL 1151DP 6B22IM j REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET No. 40 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MAIN STEAM LINE FIDW MEASUREMENT (FT ID-33A, 3)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): C-1, C-2 (33] 1 t
-h i
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: _ (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) T, Qr, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: . Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sunnary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Suxnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NIC SER 3a, 3b, 3er-M
2h tc, if, Ic, if -
System Consideration Review C= "h 4- "A- "a "f, Equipment Environmental Qualification Revieu "k - 5;, "', Si
^=
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation "h . Equipment Summary
- Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Su= nary h , '5 'c-
_ 'A
+ .
l
! &g NRC Contract No. NFC40-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Paga
$UU Franktn Research Center A DMsion of The Frankt1n ine.tute . FRC AssignmentNo.13 lb-f: 20 h and Rue Streets. Phda.. Pa; 19103 (215J 448.troo! FRCTask No. 44 6 I
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 62. ' StMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (basP ~ -t) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is
- qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE '
environmental service conditions. f The Licensee has presented information which shows there-ace no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 2 The Licensee (has/':r ^^t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment ites whose qualification has not been fully established. i
. X Justification for interim operation (has/M .~;.) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item.
L Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification . Equipment relocation above submergence level-Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment - Qualification testing of equipment in progress _2g_ Other ( Gwt.ss so r mx Affrssuryr cy. cc>sys ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment ites
'4
, that can be const-ued as a basis for justification for interim operation.
~ -) X The Licensee (hae/has not) provided a schedule f,or the proposed l corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
' :} The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j and/or should be exempted frora environmental qualification.
'i j DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC CUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
~
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
~~
Ib Modification III.a Exempt Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available . e 4
l 4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73118 FRC Project No. C52g Page dbIFrank!!n Research Center i A Dw.on c4 TN F ank!:n Incute FRC Aosignrnent No.13 2 s m and Race Stre PN!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tooo FRC Task No. 5C6 f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICA MON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 40 ' i
- a f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS , Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity BetJeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established ~ Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Esta.blished to Identify Aging Degradation __ j Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peait Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate ' o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergenc_e Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied _ _ - Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied _ ~+ _.._.- l Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies - (If Any) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied . , Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY
.[ I.a Equipment Qualified ,
i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
~! II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exe:npt From Qualification ,_
III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review - IV Documentation !bt Made Available J O e e e
%W f _
A NRC Centu.ct No. NRC47?-118 FRC Prclect No. C5257 PeGo du!) Frank!!n Research Center
. A ewen ei n.e rranks Inst:ruis FRC A5siCnraont No.13 30
, ah and R.<e sr,. . e. Phi: .. Ps.191c3 (215) 448 tcoo FRQ Task No- W 6-ECulPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. .ES . 4 LICE 1SE3 RESPONSE M NRC SER C Qualified 09 .
j Qualification As'sessment On-Going To be Replaced by a Q2alified Component __ Rev. Dates.sortl ?. M*2 h
. tine Mile Point unft 1 Cp:eneet Review Synary Sheet Ecui; ment: wata steam flew trans: sitter ID 33A. 8 Manufacturer: tese cunt
. -~. ' '
"ocel: 1151 y -
Saf ety Function: Mone Qualification Ofscrepancy: Lack of qualtffcation sata Justification for Continued Oceration: - ne main steam f%. transmitters input to the feedwater control system and provide a cias signal nen in three element control. D e transmitters provide steam flow indication and Mave no safety related function. 80tential failure , of these transmitters ould not acuersely affect ac:icent mitigation., Based on the acove. centinues coeration is justified.
N RC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 d(!!lb) ranklin Research Center Page FRC Prolect No. CS257 A D%en d h Franun Insmus,e . FRC Assignment No.13 3b j 20th and Race Strec.s. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FACTask No. 4 fog i ECulPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATiON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f'v 5 l
.j LICENSEZ RESPCNF3 TO NRC SIR (Continued)
I. i NOTES USED IN RIV!sICN 4{"533 , Nors 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were Asco Medel No,'s 8300 364? and 83C3 351YF. sorz 2 1 Qualification assessment ongoing. n0:3 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived- by engineering analysis. nors 4 Insulation qualification per 3ef erences 46 or . 47. as .. - applic.mler assesscent ongoing. - - 3 . tecTZ 5 All metallic ec=ponents: not subject to thermal or radiatica degradation at the speci21ed levels. NOTE 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualificatica cannot *oe i substantiated. , NOTE 7 Further equipment identification needed to assure applicability of test report.
. NOTE 8 The 510 00 Trip /Calibratien system is insensitive to pressure changes; a pressure qualificatica test ts not censidered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12770, Revision A).
U 6 B P e 4 9 e e.
i 4~ I NRC Conuact No. NRC-03-70-118 FRC Project No. CS257 Pago
'.dFrank!in Research Center A Dvs on of The FrankLn insitute FRC AssignmeniNo.13 Ia 20th and Race Streets PMa.. Pa 19103 (2'$) 448-Itko FRC Task No. %b EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 91 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 41 ELECTRIC MOTOR LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING
- GENERAL ELECTRIC MODEL SK445AK249A CB161088 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS TER CEECKSEEET NO. 41 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRIVES CICSED I40P COOLING PUMPS (M70-01 TEROUGH M70-03)
- LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): J-1 TIPOUGH J-3 [33]
l 4 a -,. DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, , Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: , . Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la . Sum: nary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Surnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Oh, Oe, 24
~
System Consideration Review -te, Ib, I;, Id, 00, If Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 'as' , ;n, "j "[ , Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Co, 0b - - Equipment Su=sary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Su= mary 74, 7b, 'r - e e
4-$Jiranktn Research Center N RC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A c:vun of ne Frar.kha Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and R3ce Sneets. P'.ita.. Pa 14103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. 4Glo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF ECulPMENT ITEM NO. H 4 SU.dMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: N Tne Licensee (ha s/bewaert.) provided a response to the SER concerns.
- The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is j qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no T .'. 3 outstanding qualification deficiemies. .
.l j 1 The Licensee (has/L {} proposed a corrective action for this equipment j item whose qualification has not been fully established.
, Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the 1 Licensee for this equipment item.
X Corrective aceton specified by the ticensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment - r Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment , J Qualification testing of equipment in progress 1 Other ( Qu.a.O 5's c.edi oss. Awes.rnent O vs.- C,o'i vs o )
.h
, The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item i that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.
']
, [ The Licensee tsusyh== "nt) provided a schedule for the ' proposed 4
corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
'j action .)
The Licensee states that the equipment. item does not require qualificat. ion and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW q - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
.A].
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt .
@ Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scep t II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available s
"a 9
- r. . ,
.1
Q. s NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 IJ Trank!!n Research Center FRC Freject No. C5257 Pnge A Cwn of The Fradh innure. FRC%ssignment No.13 2'
. Dh aM Rue Sun. Phta.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810no. FRC Task No. %fa EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M ,
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X , Mequate Similarity Bet *.Jeen Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
, Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation --
Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately. o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regar. ling Margins Satisfied (NUREO-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified - I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established _X 1I.0 Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Reiiew IV Documentation Not Made Available O t 6 M
. .- NRC Ccntract No. NRC431~2118 4!F h Fran;d!n Research Center FRC Profect No. C5:57 Page A Divum ci The Freenn rau rwe FRC Assignment No.13 3a
.55 and Race Sews. Ft "a.. Pa.19103 C11) 448-10M FRC Task No. 4GG l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EGulFMENT ITEM NO. 4I .
l IJCINSZE RESpCNSE TO NRC SER
?. -
4
-i j Qualified ,
X _ Qualific.aion Assess:sent On-Coing To be Replaced by a Qualified Cc:npcoenc _
)
i No MS USED IN RIVTSICN 4 {33} jy__ . _fj i *
- Non 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were Asc0 Model
, No.'s 8300 364F and 8300 361YT. .
Hors 2 N Oualification assess:sent ongoing. B073 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation
, , dese enan that derived by engineering analysis.
NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per References 46 or 47 as. 7, applicable; assessment ongoing. .. I NorE 5 All =etallic ccmponents; not subject to ther:nal or
.j radiation degradation at the specified levels. ;~ l NOT3 6 Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot be substantiated.
Nors 7, Further equipment identification needed to assure
, applicability of test report.
MS The 510 DU Trip /Calibratien Sys:em is insensitive to - pressure changest a pressure qualification test is net censidered cecessary (72".T-Rpt 12770, Reviaion A). I a 9
4.h. NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 YFrank'in Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago
.* ow.on a n.. rranen hwute FRC Assignment No.13 r:S and Pm Strem. P54a.. Pa 19M (2151 ut ano lc FRC Task No. - %6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W-
~.
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 42
, ELECIRIC MOTOR I4CATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING, ELEV. 237'0" GENERAL ELECTRIC MODEL SK828837C7 BC8365172 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 42 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 4021 FUNC: TON (PLANT ID): DRIVES CDRE SPRAY TOPPING FUMPS (M 81-49 THROUGH M 81-52)
LICEhsEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): F-2, F-12, F-14, F-19 [33 ]
- a
= = =
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents checksheet Page No. a Equipment Item la 2 Sur: mary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
., Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
~
') Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3L, L , 34 System Consideration Review ';, OL, 4w, s l, '. ; , if -
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review b , CL, 5;, 53, 34, Sf, Sg, Sh n , sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ger-66 . Equipment Summary - Maintenance anc Peplacement Schedule Summary L, 7L, Tu l
i
' 4~ NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. 05257 Page UbJ Frank!In Research Center A Divun cf The F ank!~.n Inst'twe FRC Assignment No.13 Ib 206 and Race Streets. FMa.. Fa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. EC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.11.
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NN SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: _X ,Tne Licensee (has/hus c.at) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee thas/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or wil1 function when exposed to the applicable DB3 environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information whien shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (h++/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. Cor ective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment-Equipment modification- , Equipment relocation above submergence level-Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additic.1al (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environr.ent- ~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress , Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this e.Iuipment item that can be construed as a basis for justificution for interia operation. _. ; The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed . s corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corr'ective 7- action .) he Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification 1 and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency ,
~
I.b Modificat ion III.a Exempt . Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documencation Not Available w n - ,
4Ujl!! Franklin Reserch Centu NRC Ccntract No. N RC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 A Owen of Tb TunkLn imMe FRC Assignment No.13 2
?:S and R ce Snecs. PNa.. Pa.19103 alS) 4413e FRC Task No. _d3 6-EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. SA EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = CEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established" X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
~
Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If: Required) x Program Establisned to Identify Aging Degradation __ i Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) _ _ _ , Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate X 3 Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate-Criteria Regarding Spr'ay Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria.Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Ma.igins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: j NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified ,
" j I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.a II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life
~ or Replacement Schedule Justified
,p III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.c Equip:nent Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available e e 9
e o e i e
NRC Centra:t No. NRC43-79-118 A((Ersek'in C Research Center FRC Pre!c- t No. C5257 pG A civun ci The Furi!'n :n t.tui. FRC A3denrnent No.13 30 Mth and Rxe Shsets. FMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 43-Imo FRC Task No. 46de i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SL LICENCE 3 RESMNSE '1C SE SER
?
Q2alified X Qualification Assess :ent On-Coing To be Replaced by a Qualified Cc :ponent
- 6 e
e 9 O o O e
#g NRC Contract No. N RC43-73-118 Paga
(;!$fFranki:n Research Center FRC Frc}ect No. CS257 A caws.on of The rranuin Ir ,titus FRC As3fgnrnent No.13 5f 20:h and Rue Streets. Phita.. Pa.19103 C15) 448-10@ FRCTask No. WJo
~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMEMT ITEM NO. '-/a .
+
4 a NOTES: v a _ i u ii g r o g h O reS t ttML [t n *;o\ . ("cid TM [9 AEaF A\ M + eb. i - ui a- g-Tlx lie o wo - %s efn,v A.pseueuettheu. 4 h A D 4 Mu um//MS u 9
- T M ceoe,e4 e34d f~I>~ fm:n /.tiL !st. A_t ;H _vfd1 Li go m2a 2 nr.L f:. m a Z +e aLd d1oMAs/h
/
A ceaec+(e,eura oestic. c. m % t. m e.,1 i u A Tlo. reo.c+ ches n.+ Lnoever- h red h &Le M r/ ite& nr JLd edi.sumien 1 w Ae _ s in As.A Glt w ne c+ dia. cm np2em 9eo .., L eeeca_
- 4.Ln ie,kLead edad dooJk B18A 3 7C7h . -
v i . a e - cil e,2 X 108RINhitkdodetAseM v M # h 4M e a v o a.}t$eA o ]Dtddd5_L &% eeYndrdO}i,n-
~ / i i 4
V A DOA.rM'YNd $+ f % i-lI k e MQ. a o$ v F X l06 k h 96\uec3et- u QinE C uM. - A - N t.tc.c e n i e_ L fc A l h w2m. e d a k (N1 a [$e i, LO_ E. O $__ $M f f901f A ,- :i u
- 4 Y M (13dLA _
ddk m 41 o b ao iluit 6 +LL - bddLI A . t e r. a n
.~ . - . . . . . . - . - . . . .
4 NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118
, Page MIf Franklin Research Center FRC Prclect No. C5257 A Divis,cn of The Frar.ilin Inuttute FRC Assignment No.13 5g 20th and Race $2 recs. PNa.. Pa. 19103(215) 4 3-1000 FRC Task No. . AMS, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Sd.
NOTES:
- 7h. re-r.- e e n eed ee .os r+ u n J>J ex x a n q m uJ o
& }!1t w Tr a Tm V6YIsAA & OPP? w an S^$
V d& JW ~ tena Lte&<e_ : eA 2 u'_0 ma 2 ~ 1
- s1,,cna cc.,n m e, \ ML r u, n u e khL 16.
u _._ . (/ rit h cem +G mrre ou ew&LJ a.nouu. O k lla gcA.M g%/JSdbb u u (3 M1lk .4 il{ A cL e d c o 5 d d o O k t1T C T4 4o A st d o~s k h3a A V I14 m. v . m
- ;g o et u osta e,recenen e ~ w A m . L w g i V d a u' uda o u d s kt w'ls b -fl.1 $v 5& M)$ haA IN _
d4rf x AD A Amm hm /1 12
/V /t
'~ emA &alo k s in JJlb, &hift2. _ v i y y '
- 7% hee w c_cf:d J & d,a s. h _r-nd zzlad A u n Ot M - 't1 P o V / 6 om O
S
' Q.h '
E!!LJ Frank!;n Research Center NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Dwon of The Ban l din Ins:Me FRC Assignment No.13 Ia 20:5 and Rue Sneets. Phda Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 'l% _- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33_. i
. EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 43
. ELECTRIC MOTOR IDCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING, ELEV. 198'0" CENERAL ELECTRIC MODEL SK6328XCl36A REQUIRED OPERATING TINE: 1 HOUR TER CECKSEET NO. 43 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 3483 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRIVES C0hTAINMENT ' SPRAY FUMPS (M 80-03, M 80-04, , ,
M 80-23, M 80--24) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCZW(S): N-5 TEROUGH N-8 [33} 1 4 _- a 2_ DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSEEETS: ,
4
. Contents' Checksheet Page No.
Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to tht. NRC SER lb
- Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 ,
. Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Te, Oc, 2d
; System Consideration Review h, -! b . 10, id. -10 , tf Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 6, L, k, f, h , S i,
~
$3
%, 2, G Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation E:, 'h Equipment Summary Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 75, 7:
. = .-
p -w _mm -
,-- - r
5 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118
, , , ~
FRC Project No. C5257 Page i CA Frank!!n Research Center A cms.cn et Ihe riankt.n Inseme FRC Assignment No.13 lb 1 20th and Race Streets. Phi!a.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 . FRC Task No. 4G.C, l' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _fd
+
SIIMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
- i I.
d Tne Licensee (has/hu ..A) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DSE
~
environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows t;>Sre are no 4 outstanding qualification deficiencies. 8
)( The Licensee (hes/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment < -- 1 Equipment modification - Equipment relocation above submergence level- _ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment _ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
; operation.
The' Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW d IRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) -
! I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope Q Qualification Not Established Documentation Not Available
. II.b Not Qualified IV .
i e I
y NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 Paga 4[
$ Franklin Rewarch Center FRC Project No. CS257 A owan of na Franknn Insnrute FRC Aseignment No.13 2 20th and Race Strms. .'hca.. Pa. 19103 (219 44810n0 ' FRCTask No. 4/A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICAT10N REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6L3. .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate- X
~4 Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established I Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Program ?stablished to Identify Aging Degradation . Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied
~ Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied -
Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY NRC QUAI.IFICATION CATEGORY l I.a Equipment Qualified , t I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.o Equipment Not Qualified l II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life i or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification 11I.0 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available { O 5 f S 1 e o n L .
A NRC Contraet No. NRC-G3-73-118 FRC Froject No. C5:57 Page Cil'!) Frank!!n Resaarch Center A Dien elm Franun Ineture FRC Assignment No.13 3o anh and Race Streets. FMa . Pa. 19103 {215) 448-t000 FRC Task No. u r 6, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9.J. LICENSEE RESPONSE W NRC SER Qualified X Qualification Assessment On-Coing To be Esplaced by a Qualified Component __ b
- emp
.E' k
e t A
~ ew O . t 6
9
._e 6
- e
l A NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-73-118 Pagg Ufffrankun Research Center FRC Pref ect No. CS257 A D% ion cf The FrarMn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 5g - 5th and Race Streets. Phca.. Pa.19W3 (215) 4:a.imo FRC Task No. 499 ..- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9.3_ . l
, NOTES:
TA c_ (oce Ancau M r e n A r a me d s n e eu; P,i m n ryk h s g s g a ceaukt qu_ahl.4E h- o ce s e u a cr n s M cc. 4 :n-t,
- e t e r n g )
% y y u e c1 JA 't O . b Ib N Nh _ O. M[b ~
o Q . o uqi A.' eGel 1 & mar E h ,a e.g 4 a.Y. deltM1 -lla O l In n1I M Peon 0 P4% *.'
~~
I. kNlt_ L &bec<decte s ce en e4. m . S8ver i
. O S . 6 e n e_ c,, O f_fe e_4 cic_ ( o . t c_p c 4. n_o. <4 4 f H q Aq e - -
- T ka lice w s e e_ clad nm + n m o14 e -f-cacedil;% a4 4le
' u i n s 4. 0 0 ed me 4cm +3 414. me k e inse] M <eivvsglec le s 1-e d. .
* ~T La_ eod M oz J W zt - w hekA 41;L u y o y k eLa< cr. O_ i n fn c m& ce <al, . A -fo t_ ct. ix 4 , r o J .-t -
- u :
f C V 5 0 0 e (' In t> e_ (* s*f4 4 Lt_ 9_ O C . n-[ fi b V V I D D h .Lc.m2LAthke AeIb-a_S. u h-i-M_.u' . de f N d /
. CL N Ch r ._
/
; aK wm A6JD.
4 t _. 4 J e Q
,,x NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118
, df. Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A oww i Th Franktn Inst:rute FRC Assignment No.13 lc A
20th and Race Snuts. FMa.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 'ffda i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 ELECTRIC MOTOR IDCATED IN THE REACIOR BUILDING, ELEV.198'0" GENERAL ELECTRIC MODEL SK6366xC166A HC8365174 j '_ REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 28 HOURS
,' TER CIECKSHEET NO. 44 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 3483 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRIVES CORE SFRAY PUMPS (M 81-23, -24, -03, -04)- ~
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: 'SCEW(S): F-1, F-11, F-13, F-18 [33] -
*I _
.i1
~
4
= . --
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY ""HE NRC SER - CIRt LED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, O', RT, P,'H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,'QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable 4 LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No.
, Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental-Qualification Suznary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, M '4 System Consideration Review 42, th, fr. 'd 'e 4f _
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 44, 50, ac, ;J, ~ , 5f r 523 --:L, ':1, -j - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ge;-66 ,
, Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h , 'b, 'O y 4 y .. air-- -.,s . - g
3 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page
.} 4~ du Frank!In Re 4 arch Center FRC Project No. CS257 A os,s;cn of The ranan Inst::uie FRC Assignrnent No.13. Ib 20:h and Race Sheets. PMa.. Pa. 191031215) 448-WXC FRC Task No. % fo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. W i
-i i St11 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
4 _)L Tne Licensee (has/hr %) provided a response to the SER concerns. _ The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is
- i qualified and/or wil1 function when exposed to the applicable DBE' '
environmental service. conditions. The Licensee has presented info [24 tion which shows thers-are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (ha.a/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
-i Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment, modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) t ,
Equipment relocation to a mild environment - Qualification testing of equipment in precress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (has/ bas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON EEVIEW
, - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) -
.;4
.. I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Pedification III.a Exempt QQualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
'2 & NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 Page
. dFranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dnion of The franan Ins %te FRC Assignment No.13 2 j 20th and Race Sheers. Phda.. Pa.191n3 (215) 448-10M FRC Task No. _4Gro
! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAtJFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 e .
} EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY J recumented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established . Aging Degradation Evaluated Adr quately
. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
- Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation ~
-1 Criteria Regarding Aging Simu! stion S4tisfied (If Required)
.j Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures i o Peak Temperature Adequate
; o ?eak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately
- o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regardir.g Submergence Satisfied ,
Criteria Regarding Radiat'on _ Satisfied-. .
. -I Criteria Regarding. Test Sequence Satisfied ~- -
s_ G Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies a . (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 Lour + Function Time) Satisfied
^ ~
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, C.st. I)
. DESIGNATION:
; NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified '
I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life ; q' or Replacement Sched ale Justified III.a Equipment Exentpt From Qualification III.O Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available S D Y 4 i .
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-7B-118
'.i A[sU0b Frankl:n Resesteh Center-FRC Project No. C"257 Page .
A Demn ode Funun inetute FRC Aselgnment No.13 30
. .wh .nd Rue Str m. Phna.. Pa.19:03 I215) 44S lmo FRC Task No. um EQUIPMENT ENVIRONM5NTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4'4
.e
' i LICENSEE RESTONSE % NRC SER w
e Qualifid Y Qualification As'sessment On-Going To be Replaced by a Qualified Ccmponent _
# m 4
e 6 A g, b
?* ,
E 4 i ,
"s e-e s
4 5 e , e - 4 S s 4 S
NRC Contract No. NRC43-73-118 4 00bl Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 Paca
. A 0; vision of The Frerktn inst: tate FRC Assignrnent No.13 53
! 20th and Ru Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. %6 i - .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W
.j NOTES:
l 7-Ar C o ce A n cate o d (n Arnw.e%+ sncu Pu-nrm h y 6 6
- r e4 d M il. d Mu h O c-- t < u a C f n s tri T t'e. el W +
(9.8 FMh 0 e cJ M +hek Ac
- wo. T k c_ I e e a i e 9 cc- f e c h e e A 9r:; Q 3 4 A 4 ,
0 0 oG-k i s EOR E WAM a,m d li A k h -a s i U 0 l Lk ed cfmrom 4(1- So iIn u h a ceen F4k .a g < I. tod_ g Lmbe caecie s ce en e4- ms . S8 vex ~ a
- d. 6ene_caO f_ Ige _4 ci<- (o. r e.on c 4. sta . <-(4 I 9 9 AA Tkt lic e =see_"cGel ri+ n ce utJ. 4cacedilik es4 de '
y i u in s A 4 dod mo 4ces M N meke i ns tM e ei glec Le s Fe d. W eoh J ex.<J y M w w le.Aut LLL u i o y N ekat er. O i n k r mM r ca t M -F-trt h I A d e r . o A-f 9 I fC VIOQe r %
- t1 e sf < $ *L L\ L Q_ O kA & f1 L i .
u y a o u c2Ja rc . M mnLes LkL a 1 + ,+
. y JLe 2 - QP Y A . OL_.n w ("% $
/_ /
%'% W e M
1 l 4 D
,-[ & NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 2
. Ud9 Frankun Roaarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A 0%sm of De AankLn Insteure FRC Assignment No.13 l a.
20:h and 86ce Streats. PMa.. Pa. 19103 8215) M8 tmo . FRC Task No'. Ne EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8F_
! EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 45
~
-POSITION SWITCH LOCATED IN THE REhCIOR BUILDING, ELEV. 237'0" NAMCO MODEL D2400X REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CEECKSEEET NO. 45 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 21 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): AIR VENT & FILL VALVE POSITION INDICATION (POS 201-08) ,
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCW(S ): E-2 [33] FUNCTION (PLANT ID): EQUIIMENT DRAIR SUMP ISOLATION VALVE. POSITION INDICATIONS (POS 83.1-10) LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): D-6 [3.3] -- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRWELL VENTIL.8 TION & PURGE VALVE MSITION INDICATION (POS 201-10) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCW(S): D-3 [33] FUNCTION (PLANT ID): FLOOR DRAIN SUMP ISOLATION VALVE POSITION INDICATION (POS 83.1-12) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCW(S): D-7 [33] FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NITROGEN MAKEUP & FURGE VALVE POSITION INDICATION (POS 201-16) LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S): E-7 [33] FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NITROGEN MAKEUP & VENTILATION VALVE POSITION INDICATION
~
_ _ _ _ ___ (POS 201.2-33, -06) _ LICENSEE SU3MITTAL:" SCIW(S): ' E-3, E-5 [33 ] - - - DESIGNATICN FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: , Contents Checkshdet Page No. Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l.1 l Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d,Je System Consideration Review 4= A h -- fr- AA 3= if , Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, * * ! Sg, Sh,-Si, Ej Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 1 Equipment Sumary l Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Su=ary 7d, - ~ 5 , M .
, Q. , , - NRC Contract No. NEC-03-73-118 Page diUU Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dius.cn cf The FrankI:n Inst:Nie FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. PN!a.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No, f-66 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ff
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITD4S ARE APPLI ,J.BLE: 4 i' 1 Tne Licensee (ha s/'" : no t) provided a response to the SER co.1cerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or wil'1 function when exposed to the applicable DBE ' environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
'fj ,
outstanding qualification deficiencies. i X The Licensee (has/hac n :) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (has/h+W been orovided by the Licensee for this equipment item. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: wi.a Equipment replacement with qualified equipment - Equipment modification - - Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment . Qualification testing of equipment in progress. _g_ Other (PEPL,4CEMEM7~ //~ CUAL CANH67*PF Rw3STAM'MAYEB )
, The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment ites
-, that can be construed as a basis fr r justification for interim operation.
,,. _g_ The Licensee (Aw,/has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed
,- corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective action .)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. I DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY tiASED ON REVIEW
. - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) -
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt
; II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope i
. II.D Nct Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ,
~.
l i . . l '.
4 NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 Pagg El$U Frank!!n Research Center FRC Prcleet No. CS257 A Diven of Ihe FrankFn institute FRC Assignment No.13 & 20th and Race Struts. PSca. Pa. 19103 (235) 448 1000 FRC Task No. WG EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.ff i
-)
4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM j DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY i Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X
- Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
.j Qualified Life or Replacement Rhedule Established (If Required) __
i Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation __ l Criteria Regarding Aging Sime cion S4tisfied (If Required) _; Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate
- o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposur'e (If Required) Adequate-Criteria Regarding Cpray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied i Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
} Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) a I DESIGNATION:
J
,j NRC CUALIFICATICN CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
-:}
l I.a Equipment Qualified ,
' ; I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification L II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified __
II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification i III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available O e s
.. ~ . .
a NRC Contract No. NRC-03-N-118 d[xFrankPn Research Center FRC Frefect No. C5257 Page A Dvedon of The Frarum!nscruse FRC Assignment No.13 3a
, N:h and Rxe Sams. PN!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4%
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QU' A LIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1'i v LI N SEE RESPONSE 'l:0 NRC SER X Qualified (14]
' Qualification Assessment On-Going
- _ To be Replaced by a Qualified Camponent i
J t Rev. Cate: acril 2. 19?? Mine Mile point Unit 1 C:n onent_Aeview $ a ary Sheet ._ ,
- Equi; cent: ZT5rdinitrogen maneus & bleed isolation valve pcsition .. ..
~
' $sJit:n (Pos 201.2 06) ,
v anufacturer: - _'Mamco
.tdel: 024001 .
a $afety Function: !sclation valve position indication qualification Ciscrepancy: Lack of doc.mentee cualification concerning time / tem erature aging -
. Justification for Csntinued C;eration:
The tcrus nitrogen manet;c and bleed isolation valve f s normally closed during plant cceration. It is ccen during inerting or ce.tnerting coerations. The position switch provices valve posttton indicaticn on17 and nas no c:ntrol cr safety related function. The dry = ell air vent and : urge isolation valve
?
receives an isolation signal witsin a short time of any event f:r enten it is required to c:erate. !y plant emergency precedures the coeratcr is recuired to verify isolation and the ;osition s ite?i .111 most precaoly indicate preserly. . The dry = ell air vent ano purge isolation valve is air c erated and f ails closed on loss of wtive ocwer or control signal. Once cetaining the closed
- pcsition, it is unlikely that the valve will ct:ange position.
Althougn time tem:,arature analysis currently indicates limited ovalifications
- ' based on conservative arafent tee eratures. It is unifkely the s itch would
- fail. Yalve position is centinually displayed in the centrol recs and provices a means to monitor snitch cperability for age related f ailures.
i Based on the above, centinued cceration is justified untti the position switc3
, is qualtf f ed or replaced =tta a docurented qualified posttien salten.
a h o 4 4
N RC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 b,anW Remrch Center FRC Fre!e t No. C5257 Face A Dimion cMhe Frach instuur FRC Aesignment No.13 b 20th and Race St, eats. F19:a.. Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 4GG EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMEN1 ITEM NO. SX . i '
+
j uCENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NE SER Rev. Oata: a:Fil L 1992 Mine Mile 8cint b it 1 .
' 00-ccrent Revite 5.mtry Sheet Equi;-ent: Orywell equi vent drain tank cu.let isolaticn valve j pcsition $49 ten (?cs 83.1 10) .
"anufacturer: Sanu o
. Model: 02*-002-
?. +
$4faty Functicn: [solatica valve ;csition .
I . Oualification 015creparcy: 1.ack of dccumeSted cualificatten caectrning
)'
time / ten;erature aging g
- Justification for Continued C;eratient M ;osition switc3 previces valve position Indication only and aas no centrol -
~
e,r safety related functice. De arywell ecui;eent train tant outlet isc14 tion valve (normally c:en) receives an isolatica sipal .itnin a short time of any event fsr nica 11 is reculred to c:erate. !y clant emergency :recedures. tPe cpe*atcr is requirec to .erify isolation are t*e position seitcn will most
;recably tecicate recerly. Bacxus isciatica is previced :y cter :;eratec Isolation valve 23.1-09 .niCM is to te qualified or replaced .ita a docurented Oualified valve c;erator.
- Se cry. ell ecei; ment 3 rain tant outlet ifolation val've is air o;erated and fails closed en loss of motive or c:ntrol sc.er. Once cataining t'.e closed position, it is unlikely tPat the valve 4 t' c9ange ;osition.
Althougn ti-e/te-merature agieg analysis currently indicates limited cualificaticns 34sec cn *.:nssrvative a: olent te-1:eratures. It is unlikely *se smitca culd fail. .lomal tecnnical scecification survat114nce with res;ect to valve eserCist'g 3rovides a r.eans to moniter settcn coerability for age relates failures. . t * $4 sed on the aDove, continued cceration is jupttfied untti the position snatcn ! is cualified or rectaced atta a coc mented ovalifiec position s ttcn. I l Equi;went: Ory ell ficor drain tana cutlet isolation valve position 9ev. Oate: aoril L 1992 I . setten (Pos 83.1 12) ( Manufacturer: Namco
- F1.337J
- d-
-j Model: 02:001
$afety Function: Isolation valve position indication
.g ,
- Cualification Otscre:ancy: Lack of doewrented qualificatica c:ncerntng tiee/te,perature aging Justification for Continued C;eration:
De positica s.iten provides valve position indication only and has no centrol
-, or safety related function. De drpell floor drain tank outlet isolation (normally coen) valve receives an isolatien signal within a short time of any l
l event for .nica it is recuired to c:erate. By plant eeergency receoures the i c;erator is recuired to verify isolation and t*e ;osition satten will most
;rchably indicate prc;erly. Back-wo isolatica is ;revided by motor c:eratec i isolation valve 83.1 11 =nica is to te qualified cr replacee =tth a docurented
' valve c;erator.
T1e orp ell ficor drain tank outlet 6 solation valve is air coerated and fails closeo on less of motive or c:nt ol signal. Orce octai,ing the closed posttien. it is untiaely that the valve util caerge sesition. 41thougn tiee/ tee:e sture aging analysis e.r-eet!y !ndtcates limited cualificattens based on c:nnrvative arcient temeratures it is unifkely the - setten .ould fail. Mer al tecnnical specificatten surveillance .6tn res:ect I' to valve esercising ;,covices a means to -onit:r sosttion seiten : erabiltty l for age relates fattures.
- Sased on the soeve. continued coeration is justified until tre sesition s.itca is cualif f eo or rectaceo =its a cocu-ented cualifico ;osition s,tten. .
l
. .- NEC Contract No. NBC-C3Me118
' Pago 6IFranMn U Resemch Center FRC Project No. CS257 A Divmon of The Frankan Incture FRC Assignment No.13 3C 20:h and Rxe Shnts. Ph0a.. Pa.19103 (215) 4:S-1000 FRC Task No. 4%
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.11 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO !GC SER Ga t;eent: Torus air vent and ;arge isolation valve pcsition switcn ter. Oate: ::ril 2. 1 H 2 (Pos 201 48) Manuf act:.rer: %=co - [33] Neel: 02?001 Safety Function: Isolati:n valve position indication Oaalification Oiscre:arcy: ?.acx sf soc ented cualificaticn ::ncerning time /temerat.re aging Justification for Cantinued C;eration: 2 ne ter as air vent and ; urge isolation valve is ne'-ally r closed curirg plant
' :peration. It is c:en curing inerting or ca.inerting c;erations. ne
;csition swita ;revices valve ;csitten indication only anc has no c:ntrol or safety related f.ncticn. Be t: ras atr vent and purge isolation valve receives,an isolation si;nal within a short time of any event for whien it is recuired to ::erate. By plant erer;ency precedares tre e: erat:r is re:ufred to vertfy isolati:n and the osition s.iten will most presably indicate
;r::erly. Eacm.i.o isolation is proviced by meter cre-sted isolation valve
;3107 nic:t is to te qualified or replaced atta a ecc:.rentad valve c eratsr.
De ::rus air vent and purge is*1ation valve is air ::erate: and fails c!csed on Icss of .,ative ;o.er or c:ntrol sis 9al. Cnce catainirg ue eleseo
;csition, it is unlikely tnat the valve will crange p sition.
~
altnosgn time te- e*atare ana1ys'is currently indicates limited qualificati:ns tased cm conservative amsie9t.tameeratures, it is uni nely the smiten -ould fat 1. valve :esition is c:ntinually displayed in tre control reem and provices a means to contter switch c;ersellity f t a age related failures. Based on the a:,ove, continued coeratten is justified u..11 :Pe positicn sulten is cualified or reolaced esta a coce49tes qualified position seiten. h ut =ent: Orywell air vent and ; urge isolation valve positi:n swito tev. :ata: 1sril 2. 1982 (Pes 201 10)
*anufacturer: Namco . {337J Ndel: 02400I
$4f ety Function: Isolation valve positien indication Oualificaticn Discrepancy: Lack of dec:. rented cualification c:acerning tirre/te-cewature agi99
- Justification for (cntinued Cceration:
D e crywell air vent and purge isolation valve is normally clcsed during plant ocecation. It is ocen during inetting or de.inerting evoluttens. De position switch provides valve petition indication only and has no c:ntrol or safety ralated 'uncticn. De drywell air vent and ourge isolation valve receives an isolation signal witnin a short time of any event for -nica it is required to cce-ste. By plant eaergency ;rececares the cce-ster is recuired to verify isolation and the position sniten will most probably indicate
=recerly. Bact.us isolation is =rovided by m tor c erated isolation valve 20109 .hich is to te qualified or replaced alth a doc:.mented valve cperator, ne dry ell air vent and purge isolation valve is a'ir coerated and falls . ..
I c1csed on loss of mtive pe=er or control signal. Once cetaining the closed sosition, it is unlikely that the valve will change pos ttion. altheugn time te-:e-ature analysis cur +ently indicatas Ifmited cualifications *
- tased en censervative a-cient te teratures. It is unlikely t3e sett:n -oule fail. Valve csition is c:ntinually disslayed in the c:ntrol recm ans pr:vtces a means to nenitor seiten ::eranility for age related failures. ,
Sased an 'he atove, contin u ed coeration is justified until tne :ositten seit:n is cualified or reslaced eita a cocuv sted sualified ocsiti:n setten.
~i N RC Contract No. N RC-03-73-178 Page A@J 0 Franklin Resurch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Olvwicme nadun insotwo - FRC Aseignment No.13 3d.
M end Race S:reets Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 f. Io EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _45. , 1 LI N SEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Rev. Oate: aoril 2, 1932 Mine Mile Point Unit 1 Cc penent Review Jer ary $heet E uis-ent: icrus s, vent and purge isolatten valve costtien s,tten .
.(Pet 20I 15)
Manufacturer: Mamcar. ,
'tce1: "2t002 Safety Function: Isolatica valve positten indication
' Qualification Discrepancy: Lack of documented cualification c:ncerning tiee/ter ;erature aging Justificaticn for Continued Cceration:
*he tarus N2 vent and purge isolation valve is scr ally c1: sed during plant Ocerati:n. It is c:en during inerting or de-inerting evolut tens. De xsiticn sof tc3 3revides valve ;csition irdicaticn caly anc ras no c:ntrol cr-safety related function. D e t:rus N2 vent and purge isolati:n valve receives an isolation signal eithin a short ti e of any event for -nica it is required to eterate. 3y slant e+ergency 3rocecures the :eer car is racuired to verify isolati:n and the ; cst ten switch will mst precao'.if indicate
;ressely. !act-uc isolation is ;revided by mtor ::erated isolatica valve 201-31 whica is to be qualif ted or replaced atta a doc.:rentes valve ::erator.
D e tarus 42 vent and surge isolatian valve is air c:erated and fails closed n Icss of motive ocwer er c:ntrol signal. Once cbtaining the closed
;csition, it is unlikely that the valve ,611 change position.
41thougn time teace'ature analysis currently indicates limited qualifications based en conservative amtent tegeentures, it is unlikely the sof tch -ould fall. Yalve ocsiticn is c:ntinually $1solayed in the c:ntrol roc:a and grevices a means to m nitor switca c:eraatlity for age related failures.
!ased on the above, continued Oceastion is justified untti tSe position switcM ts qualified or replaced with a documev5ted 4.alified Desitism switen.
e
'I O
y 8
' o 3
4 O n N S l l
. _ _ . . _ . _ . . _ . _ _. . _ . . . . . . i_
NRC Cont act No. NRC-03-73-118 4.[NN Frank!In Reserch Center FRC Freject No. C5257 Page A ov i ei n. rankan imr:ture FRC Assignment No.13 3e m .nd a.c. str. ts, nita.. Pa.19103 mil M 1000 FRC Task No. %(o - EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .iE T LI N SEE RESPONSE 'IC NRC SER (Continued) NOTES USED IN RIVISICN 4 {3"$'.I. 1
.l Nors 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 were As03 Model
't ~
No 's $300 364F and 83C3 351YF. 1 . 5073 2 Cualification assessment ongoing, s E072 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiation dose than that derived- by engineering analysis. BOTE 4 Insulation quali*ication per References 46 or 47 as applic_ abler assessment ongoing.
.,.,.w.
NOTE 5 All metallic ccmponents;. nqt subje,ct to thermal ce radiatien degradation at the specified levels. Nof2 6 >( Equipment willbereplacedi*quali[icationcannotbe i substantiaced. , Hors 7 Further equip =ent identification needed to assure applicability of test report.
. NOTE 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to pressure changes; a pressure qualificatica test is not censidered necessary (BMT-Rpt 12770, Revisica A).
~;.
t i ., si Y .
j l
- Q 2edFranklin Rewarch Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pags A Div:s<on of The Fradhn hs:::uis FRC Assignrasnt No.13 50.
7 20th and Rue Streeis. Pht:a.. Pa_ 19103 (215) 449-1000 FRCTask No. # 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. d.f. . a J EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW 4 f Criteria: DOR Guidelines g,_; NUREG-0588, Cat. I ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .. DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIRF_MENTS WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR , SUEMITrAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) (DOR /0 588-I/0 588-II) ! 1 ! t EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION l' j Equipment Type !P3J/ T/ON ! 4 fg/ [ fyr7 c# !
! SW/TT*// ! !
Manufacturer's Name IN4MCO ! /Vd ATC C ! (5.2.2/-/-) ! !
. . e Model Number (5.2.2/-/-) 32WW h 32M X 8 M 3 h b
!for frA TEO ! /V'0 7" Z 7~4 7"A O !
Seria1 Number g Features /MountLng ! gey .gy;4 rg o 2 y74 .gy g 7-f D g (5. 2. 6/-/-) ! ! Connections / Interfaces IN'0 7'S7~47~2D 1 /G G B fi~A4kbcD W/AE s ! (5.2.6/-/-) ! ! GR Vv/N o t I qu/Ar?sN: i ! ! Location / Elevation ! A B,jkJ 7 0 *! ! - Equipment ID No. !d'ES AW54 fd ! VAAlv v J !
. QUALIFICATION REPORT
, (8.0/5.0/5.0)
_; Report ID Number !PSA #21 2/fr,/-yoo7. cat (py,qe;j)!y,7.gj 0
! ! ///2 9{ff
! 1.
> Report Date ! o
, N V.S C o faj ,
3 Issued by ! ! 884 !
!1 MMP C l NM/1-1 1
Prepared for ! ! Referenced Reports VA4/Od8 h /VO7~4 I Qualification Method ! ! g gg f., y.g /g 7 gg/~ !
; (5.1, 5. 3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) ! ! ._
) QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM ~ Functional Test Description ! I j 2 0 v , ytt v.A / N Alt /f// d !### E
! 1 2 g y-g f., oA a !
(5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) ! Operating Conditions ! !g,7 p 7go ! l (-/2.2.10/2.2.10) I. cad / Cycles / Voltage / ! ! ! Current /Freq. I ! l
4'I NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pago UILJ Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dwn of The Frankan Insetute FRC Assignment No.13 5b 20:h and Race Streets. Phca.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443-1000 FRC Taek No. #46
. ,i
. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4S.
a j NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY
! WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMI'PTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)
! ! 1, Acceptance critecla ! !L/GHT als4A /LLuM'"A" !
(5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1) ! !7 fog f.g,4spo/g V44PS '
- 0,ncA.4 r/dN.
- Accuracy (5. 2. 5/-/-) '
' g,7 j7j. 7gg '
j Number of Specimens, , ! ! 2 2-
*; 1 ! .
l Test Instruments Calib$ated ! '
!/V#T #4I#O !
i ! ! ! Safety Function (Active / ! e8 4.rg/ V4 ! -
! p gg Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3) ! ! !
, Test Duratio'n (5.2.1/-/-) ! . ,24 Nov4.5 1
, Accident Duration (Envir. ! y j g,,,4 1 !
Above Normal) (5. 2.1/-/-) .,!. ! ._ Required Function Time '2 !' 3 Nos/A 3 1 -
.u l, ! !
Test Sequence (General) " !~ ~ JCcMr6/NJA YM8 ! (5.2.3/2.3.1/2.3.1) ! ! N Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, ! ! -1 Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-) : ! !
! ! t
- 1. Representative Sample ! ! I l 2. Baseline Data ! ! !
> j 3. Performance Extremes ! ! ! I l 4. Thermal Aging ! ! ! l ., 5. Radiation Aging ! ! - ! 6 Wear Aging 1 ! !
' J.l 7. Vibration / Seismic ! ! !
i
.', 8. DBE Exposure ! ! I~
l G 9. Post-DBE Exposure ! ! !
~
- 10. Inspection ! '! !
( , Aginq ! ! ! (5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) ! ! !
,1 Thermal Aging / Basis ! 1,gAANEN/t/I Nadd 1 ,
l l Material Aging ! ! /YDi"/'3MRA MED 1 y g, I
' .- i .
Evaluation (7.0/-/-) !
.I
.._. Materials Susceptible f M urV4 'N ' . .
i ' ::$ (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7. 0/-/-) ! ! a . . !. l 3 .
,ys' y- ,oEAscoseMfD ,
. Radiation Aging, Type . .
.:_ . 9,
** e , @9 >
'I NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 ds FRC Project No. C5257 Page f d') Frank!in Research Center A o on as m rnnunInsotute FRC Ansigninent No.13 $C Sh and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4?8-1000 FRC Task No. 44G ~!
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL!FICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d.L. .
?
DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS
- WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR SUBMITIAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO. )_
. (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) !
- Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) !/.fSOG ! /. 4 E d G g , yore 3
- Radiation Aging, Dose Rate ! sVor JrarSD. ! *Yo T* PER FCAM BO !
Radiation Aging, Method 4 N4 4'#/# h A#U -- k Materials Susceptible ! Afar JTATED ! GUNA 'M ', MGL4ef/NA ! (Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) ! Operational Aqing ! N0f ZYAM ! 5 7 JTA l~dD t (-/4. 2/-) . . . Other Age Conditioning Wdr 474 FED W0 f A fA Y (-/4.2/-) ! Qualified Life claimed / ! /2.s yEAAS ! /.2.S* y' M A S 5'Wo?'Ef - Established (5.2.4/4.10/-) ! Normal Ambient Temperature ! ! Normal Amoient Radlation !}
! eId7" (TATSO!
~
Normal Ambient Humidity !; ! ! , On-Going Surveillance and ! Wa r g r/ RED ! - ! Preventive Maintenance ! ! I (7.0/-/-) ! On-Going Analysis of ! ! ! Failures and Degradation ! ! ' j (7.0/-/-) ! ! l' g g g . 't Margin (General) ! ! ! 1
, (6.0/3.0/3.0) 1 1 Margin (NUREG-0588, ! ! !
- Cat. I) (-/3. 2/-) !
i' 1. Temperature (+15'F) ! !
- 2. Pressure (+10%, ! ! -
j - 10 psig max) ! ! ! -
! 3. Radiation ! ! !
; (not required) ! ! ! .
- 4. Time (+10%, +1 hour ! ! !
+ function time minimum) ! ! !
*1
-Y t e e
NRC Contraet No. NRC-03-73-118 4[cEd rank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A owon of Th. r,anan Inetute FRC Assignment No.13 , 5d 20th and Rac.e Sneets. PMs.. Pa. 19103 1215) 449 1000 FRC Task No. -A 6 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. If J..j NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY
, WITH SECTION REFERENC5.' LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR
', I (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUEMI'I*IAL DOCUMENTATIO!. NOTE NO.)_
ACCIDENT CONDITIONS ! ! !
! L !
IDCA/MSL3/HELB/ Uncontrolled ! #E48 ! M844 ! , 4 (4.1, 4. 2, 4. 3.1, 4. 3. 3/ ! ! ! I 1.1, 1. 2, 1. 5/1.1, 1. 2, 1. 5) ! ! !
. . i e i
; Radiation Type ##7' M D ## NO"## k
-' ~
Radiation Dose (rd) ! 1 Sa g AsA cip riep Ansy g! (4.1.2/1.4/1.4) ! ggggg(gg,4 !
/Acc/22e#7) !
Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr') ! # v7 ,r rArr a!_ p o r joa 4 /: c a n s a g Radiatioh Qilal. Method ! AWA/.Y5'/S 1 ANA L yJ/f 1 (5.3.1/-/-) ! ! ! Proximity to Concentrated 1 #d7" #7 f 7'EB! ! Radiation " ' ^ (4.1.2/1.4.6/1.4.6)~~ ! - - Equipment Susceptible to ! ! ! i . Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) ! ! ! Radiation Dose (Normal + 1 1 -! Accident) (4.1.2/-/-) ! ! ! Plateout Dose Considered ! ! ! (-/1. 48/1. 48) ! ! ! Gama + Beta Dose (rd) 1 1 1 (4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7) ! ! . ! .
' ' . .i 8
e p 4 b
#N.e 4
- +.- .-. . . _ - . . . . . . . .. ..---.- .. .y . , . , . .,
i ~ NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 155' Frank!:n Research Center FEC Pref ect No. C5257 Page A ci,,.an or m rr. nan Ineruse FRC Assignment No.13 ,Te 20th and Rue Streets. Phs a.. Fa 19103 (215) 443 1000 FPC Task No. 466 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .if - 4 .
~
NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIEiCY 1' WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATICN (X OR
. (DCR/0588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMD3TATION NOTE No.)
! I !
ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE ! ! !
~
CF ACCIDENT CCNDITIONS ! ! !
'; Rate of Temp./ Press. ! 8 */[~ TEC~ ! ## 7~ J'~d 7'# O !
Increase
+
= e , ,
i Peakh *F/psig/RH/ Time 1/2Gjkokoc//ps ! 340,//c3//cg/j/M. t'
~
crease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time //S//,e[aaf),gd J20/ 73"// o d/f #/4 Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time J.fv[//,//0O//##A' Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ! ! ! Equipment Surface Tempera- ! A/or .fr4rro! ! ture (MSLa) (-/1.2.5.C, _ ! ! !
- 2. 2. 6/1. 2. 5 . C ,' 2.2.6) :1 1 1
! !~ !
Spray Qualification Method (5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, !
! N//f !
2.2.8) ! ! ! f; Spray Composition ! l' ! (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/ ! ! !
- 1. 3, 2. 2. 8) ! ! ! .,
,2 Spray Density (gpm/f t 2) g g g
~,
Spray Duration ! ! . !
. -j * ~~
Submergence Durati'on ! ! ! ( 4.1. 3/ 2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5) ! ! !
. , In-Leakage Considered ! ! !
(5. 2. 6, 5. 3. 2/-/-) ! ! !
.'. ; ; .. g
. Li Time to Submergence ! ! !
.:3 .e Dust Environment ! ! !
4
.(-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) ! ! !
.i :t' .
i
'4
- - . . ~ -. .. ... - _ . . .
! NRC Centract No. NRC-03G-118 Q' -,,_s j WJ Franklin Research Center FRC Prc}ect No. C5257 PdQ0 4
A DN:wn of The Franun insetute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Servets. PMa.. Pa.15103 d15) 4'8-1000 FRC Task No. 96G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. df~9
., ! ORES:
/) MA 42/ rm err */r e/w evakaslA e f 8 AGme a m d-lAt<e et r.:s.d'.rL _1 her-i /_eni,-AAn A, /Ase- a / 2mka ea d,*1b ned ems /
_ A s A& s y ss <
.1n /-hc~ m_r-,ll'i./nAr er / crA). AGA #d72 * ("r)J'A e/4- A-n/,/0//4h/)yd'eA A n fam mitevr ,m e-/ cit A q,- r, a b . ,o e e-xv wd' .s A t ,.- *Ars Me brb
/ .
~
e,J* Lin t rss?/,rt- ? unn-m Ar., e lY nr>'A-l-1 5 e
- b l as it r* Ar-a <
.)
,.f 9
2nci A APA #2/. ._ T/e es.c/iY' an d-/A--- a s '~. s< e/ A8 !v> AAa an * *u-of<eb v v
> Y acat , !A r-r*)b er/ $'bakm-21ys-Aa - 'Ar. P # ,l'a ben /Aer/s// a v$jem ) /A r./h m.xem /we e- Aus eb~bs e 9 r^'$ m a/v~isb esm.
J'f-. 1kn e] ! ftsis * ** A a 1, /*f* Of9 P A s-*T M M Af A .<. PY ff D A49-c/ gr!J,,a /* lr. d8 A*/t sl l8 _r ve*/A1 -cd WL mornrs / enud?r-rn':n/r
.a d A-a w>An/ < n d62,.
/ _
) a - - - - - A = A
- -mad rn ew eJ M- m a_ A~ a A e--n>..
a /A 4~ aA e--
-! /
e,L-4 o LA man A-/ ne el Afe /rra /-r-/a & ,An wAse A* s, a e/ia /A Mr/
/
/A> -.*/Rch e r x-m d% A,Wr/ - ar< </ i r n ;D l !"m* / /WE ln5
/ /
,de /A is abw. j -
,rivf A d N-e. % s -
.4, 8 ? n e/Arn m h- -
t~fn J ,,,_ M i,*oo,.J A ,oe, >,,/
<<r ,,+ ds,n,Jm /mL n /s ss/
~
//a i y ,,r/ 4:,.s %j ,s.
9 E e 4 a me eE- ,_
~
, 4 NRC Contract No. NRC-C3-73118 Page
- f. drank!!n Tiewsrch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A o.mn cme Fr.4un reute FRC Aasignrnent No.13 53 2mh end Race 5 beets. PNta.. Ps. 19103(2151 448 1000 FRC Task No. #4G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. IE ,
NOT.'S 21 PC)3 d +724 'M rs >lr ,e ' tz e'e.~ d*,_r l k~,n ~a lao,. /Jr-r un o mdsban Unr*?M 9 b e f dl *O * **Ff $W$Y *S/ = PM.D} -D'f* Yst,1rn !)m? eksE bb s*D__
,a i s W *f/*Pr'k l !<>= l
;i 44 1%, ifnit switches sera tested in accordance vitta the test description, i
entitled '*! cst *escription. ?omities Switch for 'isin Sccxs Ischtson Valve. See = tuvirement" (actached as Eshibit 1). 1triefly. the test continTel of
, the followJng. The 11.,tt svisel.as rest sasc=bly (incluJinr. the junctic i ws
,a _ and hoo'.up vire) som riaeed la a necae chambcr. Steam was gecerates to .
pte *uce as savironwut of r.bset 103 psig pressure and 340 F. n.c avs teks
'vera arcrata4 aluring a 3 haur rcried. The cavirou a-at .as then chant,cd rn 75 paf g precrure and 300 r._T'a suiteks scre again eccrated durin: t N nest 18 hours. The actions of the limit switches were sipified 1ry es and off con-dittees of the 11;ht bulbs and the action of the solanoid valvo connect.at to the limit svttches. Upos removal from the test chamber, the cast assambly taas au s ued a.d u.,.o.d. , -
4 4 / nie -- ~,,u p ,./r,s.,v, + ~ +~,ns a , m /, a ' anJ1,, d J /A 2 4. A- ,Lc/
. .-/,- - ,., ~,,.,, A car- d n a < U /A /,= a ,,a,. . -
ned sl A.a e/es,e = l r er e_ ,/ bm,.,, s L A,--/ l.: y- J rr/2 4r/ m-r. - A% e A ca Al sir, A a J /d aa >- AJ a c.-/A,, J ca,,- y 7 i i .
- ekk%x.#sw-w a ,6 ene A b e a . ~ ~k $e in_ /b /*r/sw,4At O /
as.W /A' J._a/. #- e/ ritn'AAu 4% c ms //~ , cam. L Al Ae-,,1- . 1 M, L /A> - . . .:n,-_, / :/- L /,m n/a ., / b <4 A>m/
* ='
.] J (/ / (/ V es,# ~.o- /is _ea;& -A, A' /a,, /A /-1/ m,e, n-- w .,i /A A l!> Y liwP2K e 'l3 b b ' or m n 1n' e! n.a! rb %e, /$ fk!11. bea.
n J s:.tA ~ . X 4, n xd anAtl1 m,,,d /'r4 s n-,4A iS 1->
,n :/ ~,
a,,, s, / ,? - .c- sra ,;. - < xd -A~ ul-N /r e/ J$ ler/ P-redb 8 W ,,;,s/2 //- </ o c um r,-. ,,, ! m,
/ /
n
/ _
p
- 3) A 6 11.l (r-ru/%) n / A PA3 /2/ d 4+ /A A//n,-;. - r-
" ~
1 ,1 u
- nb /~aA'4l6 !
i
NRC Ccntrac2 No. NRC-03 4118 Page
~
Il0b Franklin Research Center FRC Prejoct No. C5257
- A Divwen c4 The Franh Insetute FRC Assignment No.13 5h 20 bad Race Streets. Ph2a.. Pa.1963 (215) 44s.1000 FRC Task No. Md ._
- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .gf "4
(.
? HOTES:
1 . i A l nl* H) /*! nnel
. As i sm d au rseers . ::= !_2 m ,
en.ay p s,n7=,w 4, a. w.,e e rv.m,ess a,4 d
,h nies=w rwa O24*ea e J 2s2 2ensos own as
- so-ro r 4.* * =ca-s sste fa.a.i.4 .n -J ehm .s.em/
s h; Aw s et or,e? no m *e. 4. e . .or c4
,a,,e= >d .* /,e4 e rwaP 44.ae4 4/ /. vs <* ' ,sesJ i
(de/ 't) o9-w? hw e4 on rm4meel se
*/*.to w to ' og s o 's ,4
/.s.,,nso J . e a<
l (2pJ n) B s s . 1,
/**- b l* */ff** f t*s ' d'A l9 J*ett/9 t* r As S P A b* d Kb -
$.s f
/*f) A$2 L Ast,r!J4 2 MM /?9 0 . MPr #1 re P* V/WfM $c*(qM*An d.
~
/
P
- V/
- 1* - o /
EfA'2* P=ne/l MA-2/19 s'e*v /9d'/ dis br=>/ /* 2 /~eY
# n lb *rA// b v- '.,.$s AunJ 'N'/W,*/>b } ceJM-be *
- A;i.m /de,fu /o - e,/ ~ 2r/o .
^
~am/ G.7x f n ' Pr Jr '. n -ear *A. 2:.,-o /8 rr.*Asa r.fs~no /-La AM JM J
_/LW & tsis9 Y e d'* r4 svs,r*A f"A r* f@ d f s*' A94 W AlA $ -
*'* /PT-4 =
y
.or*/ eft a,/ r*s /P&m is r.l MA o abM Yo /* *.* ao <A s"r/ ks**[, YA Y ?rAsAs
. s - ,
m,,/:Am nr h er, raes-dA.6 n,G ' A4- w Mi-n-n/A ' V V / pad % k . 3 A A S ?? &fy , [$f
- < sj - - i a g v , s w m .s,.. ~r~,a s.4
.=A h4 P AweeA . #=e# J&J 4 er/sei J.-s maav$,
s us,,e Pw. ses % w rn s/ er .,4 4i
#*'88 GFM M 47*
79a*#[J*fmsav r47saru* Je*Ja 7Flae ## d*C. 4.*-r a 4,*s4
> doe.et g%.eder=vur$ 7'h e 4 o r ome.=J of a. c re-as , .a / s r .ar ai . ,,i-w a 73rne,.eseareenes Theod.or as r sJ 4, Z 64 A*.42. o s .*
$r Y Y8 & *$ 8 Y
- hh$$ Y
,,,,.,sumn*
/G*$"fenen wesmems 71.nps**resers=tr da/*jTme /*
MJ'r. Pe 4,Ars **pe. 4 s /# es,see.nse/ d,4. / ..*J .7.*& f &
. Y h hY W h 4%.=1pe.n?L e Je.* g DEM* 4 g** M f*
& de <$ T' 4 As 4 *tnoew e9 70 fes/ed-e 7% rad M ar7 Jose.euG M rn=w .n's,aaan! .*me a=s/ */* so/e .t*e1 en osa.4, g l
_ _ _ . ._ ~ _ . __ __ o _. _..m
~ .
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 LOhrantdin Resca ch Cen:ct FRC Project No. CS257 P G8 A Dvse of b Frank!!n !n ntuis FRC Assignm9nt No.13' 20th e ,d Race Streets. PMa , Fa 19103 CIS) 443. toro -
#G4 76.
FRC Task t.'o. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 65-MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCIEDULE SL . MARY The following information regar' ing d the maintenance and replacement schedule (s) for components, sub-componer.ts, and materials has been provided by the Licensee.
/ Y" /[ ,$5 C rr:wA.,4/** hN*T* 8 4.*N#4 = 'Y 3 C&ffsA)**ET <:::Ff J4d4 du.es 7CHfC & kAM,t*h CU ,4 s l + C o Lse r2 f Y & d e e lc : e c / A s 4 S / S . >l* x
/?Is9 /s tr7Mrs 1//! d/ A0As4 A/ A 7* /kdr??,4 L kr2 usee T<*mf**rM7vrzg i3 CMcum 7a ef '70 44,.
,9fru s.r'<ris c ?' /a C'yess . 7Woae G,vp m ?3 Cuevee9 fa 4: paced effimw. era : .r.:/4w/
Asit (Tjf@l,f 70 At dA/'"4 Wfmfedu.*77M~. sp O e O e ?
,5 l
J t 4 m o
**-e* e .
' 4.
MU Frank!!n Research Center N PC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page.
. . A Div. son of The Bank!:n fmt:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lQ 20:h and Rue Streets. Ph%. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4fA, i
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .h-
.', EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 46
} POSITION SWITCH LOCATED IN TE STEAM TIDNEL
, NAMCO MODEL D2400X REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 FOUR TER CECKSEET NO. 46 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 21 FUNCTION (PLANT ID); MAIN STEAM BYPASS POSITION INDICATION (POS 01-05, -06)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): B-5, B-7 [33]
- )
l
. : ~_~_..;-_..
.::b; c,_- ._ 2
.ut 4 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
R, T, Qr, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, W , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
! Not stated, Not applicable a
LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: '
. Contents Checksheet Page No. . - . Equipment' Item la ,
Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, Ber-3d
- System Consideration Review '?. '" Sc, id, "O, 'f -
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review fa, 95. *c FA ~ ?c, "-f , Og, 'h, Si, 51 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 55 .
- Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7-c. , L , 'O 4
Q.,;__ NRC Contract No. NRC43 70-118 U$J Franktn Resesi.h Center FPC Project No. C5257 Pa02 A Dmpon ome Fra%'in Inst twe FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Suests. Phi!a.. Pa 19103 t215) 44a.1000 FRC Task No. 446 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4-4 3 . { SU*?4ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: _,X,Tne Licensee (has/hu ..o t) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) sped fically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBF., environmental service conditions. l The Licensee has presented information which shows there. are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (has/k .wi.) proposed a corrective action for this equipmant item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interin operation (has/':: 7.; t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment' item. _X, Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equip:nent replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level
~~
Relocate or shield equipment fro:a radiation source Verify' qualification by additional (testing / analysis) l , Equipment relocation to a mild environment -
- Qualification testing of equipment in progress L Other (pfm. Ac2MEMr tr GudL CAMMor M SuMr4 Mf/A ffh )
, The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment ites
[ that can be construed at a basis for justification for interim opuration. i 1 The Licensee (kaa/has not) provided a schedule for the p: oposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, and/ot should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW j - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt - II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l
6 NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page UdFranknn Rescarch Center i A Dimn a m reanun Insmute FRC Assignment No.13 2
?Jth and Race Strws, Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 466 8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .n.
, EQUIPMENT E!NIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLP. MARY FORM
.1 DESIGNATICN:
X = DEFICIENCY 1 NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and, Test Specimen Established X ,
~
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
.j Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation
- Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Require'd) '
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Vxposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate - o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Catisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied -. Criteria Regarding Test Sequence SatisfiedC r - -- -- - Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Ancmalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:
' X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY t -
I I.a Equipment Qualified , I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification x ! . II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified I, II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review I IV Documentation Not Made Available 4 \ l foAn der:4/L ED ANs4 4.yC/S SEE EQuspMEM7' Z7~EM f$ , l i l i
., .: NRC Contraet No. NRC-03 71-118
@l? Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 PaOS A cua.on ol m rranan :nneure FRC Assi;;nment No.13 3a
; :cm.ad a.co.ser. 4 m:... Pa 19103 cm 4*s-tom v - FRC Taek No. 4M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW 0F EQUIPMENT ITEM NO'.' 46 LIbSEERESPONSE'IONRCSER Q2alified Qttalification Assessment On-Going-X To be- Replaced by a-Q2alified Cot:2ponent k Rev. Cata: aseil 7, 1932 h3}
Nine Mete 4cint Unit 1 Cerconent Review 5 mary Deet ,
~
Etuf m nt: wein stears 11ne cuttoard isolation valve tysass valve position switc.i (Pos 01-05 & 01-06)
' ~
wanufacturer: Nasco .
%cel: C24001 Safety Function: !solatten valve ;ositien indication Qualification Discrepancy: Lack of documented qualification conceening
. time /tegerature agtng Justification for continued 0:eration:
De main steam Itne cuttcard isolatien valve tycass valves are in tne closed l 't pos ttien during nor-al plant coeration and are used to ars up the main steam
; line during reactor startuos from a mot c:ndition. De positten switen provides valve positten Indication caly and nas no control or safety related
{ function, nese valves receive an isolation signal ettnin a snort time of any event for =nich they are r*cutred to coerate. 8y slant emeegency procedures.
, tne cerator is recutred to verify isclation and the positten setten will most u arenanly indicate pr::erly. Sectuo isolatten is proviced by rat:r ccerator main steam line inboard isstation valves -nica are to be qualified or replaced eftn securented cuellffed valve coerators. ,
! ; Tne main steam line cuttcard Isolation valves bypass valves are air coeratec and f ati c1csed on loss of 'otive :ower or centrol signal. Cnce obtaining the closed position, it is unlikely tnat the valve will change position.
'. ! 3ased on the aseve, centinued c:eration is justtf fed until t'e :esition sniten -
is cualified ce replaced witn a cecumented qualtfled :esition smiten. 8 4 0 t
NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 nk!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Divmon ci N T7anun In# Mute FRC Assignment No.13 - 3b r:h c.nd Race Stres, FMa.. Pa. 19103(21 2 443 1000 FRCTask No. %Co - EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _W.
.~
LI N SEE RESPONSE % NRC SER (Continued) No 25 CSED IN REVTSICN 4[55]
; so:s 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26_ sere Asco Model
; No.'s 8300 364F and 83C3 361YF.
scT2 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. scrrs 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiatier- . dose than that derived by engineering analysis. NOTE 4 Insulation qualification per 3eferences 46 or 47 as applicabler assesscent ongoing. .. BCTE 5 All setallic components not subjett to thermal or radiation degradation at the specified levels. NOT3 6 X Equipment will be replaced if qualification cannot bar i substantiated. NOTE 7 Further eq,:ipment identification needed to assure-applicability of test report. -
'. NOTE 8 The 510 OU Trip / Calibration system is insensitive to pressure changest a pressure qualification test is not I considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12710, Revision A).
]s en 4
4
,9,
4.. . NRC Contract No. N RC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Paga
. W'2J Tranktn Research Center A o~un of m Frantt.n inetuis . FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20:h.nd bce screets. Thc... Pa 19103 s215) 448 Irmo FRC Task No, M EOUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EOUIPMENT ITEM NO. 47 ,
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 47 POSITION S'41TCH LOCATED IN THE EMERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLATION VALVE CUBICLE, 1 ELEV. 298'0" NAMCO MODEL D2400X REQUIRED OPERATING TIE: 1 FOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 47 i LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 21
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NITRCGEN MAKEUP AND BLEED ISOLATION VALVE IOSITION INDICATION (POS 201.2-32, -03)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCE'4( S) : D-11, D-13 [33]
. FUNCIION (PLANT ID): NIIROCEN VENTILATION & FILL ISOLATION "4LVE POSITION
!, INDICATION (POS 201-32)
LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCE'JCS): D-8 [33] x DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLYt (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None,
'; Not stated, Not applicaole 1
i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: .
. Contents Checksheet Pace No.
Equipment Item la
- Sum: nary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environ:nental Qualification Summary Forms 2~
~
$ Licensee Response to NRC SER "' a , Ib, C., 3d System Consideration Review 't, !b, ic, II,
., Of- -
** Ch *A 'a "#,
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review n .
- h , *% *!, St Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ea r r.b Equipment Su;mnary
% " '7 -
Maintenance and Replacement Scnedule Summary
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 4"h. I. rsr.k!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Psge A Den of Th Frankfin Ir stwe FRC Ass!gnment No.13 lb Zhh arid Rue Stims. Phca.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. V46 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. MZ. SU.t. MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITDdS AR2 APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/hr; .c t-) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service, conditions. The Licensee has presented infor=ation which shows t! Lere are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (has/W nt) prossed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment repla~ cement with qualified. equipment Equipment modi _fication Equipment reloEation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing /analysia) Equipment relocation to a mild environment , Qualification testing of equipment in progress
._)( Other (LSefk~EMEMr /f f2v4L t~weer Af suAfrANrMrED )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item j that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim i operation. 0 8 1 The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed ' corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment ite:a does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. 3 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW , .i - CIRf*T.Fn ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 1 - I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency h Modification III.a Exempt - II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available . e d .
-^
- a- .ma,-am am m m _, a o _
, 42.f frank!;n Rexard Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A DNision of De Fianun Imwe FRC Assignment No.13 2
?Cth and Race Shers. Pt.'s.. Pa.19103 CIS) 448-1000 - FRC Tatk No. -M 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .:6Z_ .
~
t EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL __ QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM r)ESIGNATION : X = DEFICIENCY
, NRC REQUIREMENT _S Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X -
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established" (If E'equired) Program Establisned to Identify Aging Cegradation __ Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o P.eak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Pagarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation' Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: X = CATECORY NRC QUALIFIC\ TION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified , x" I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.s Equipment Qualification Not Established j II.o Equipment Not Qualified l II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation !bt Made Availabl;
~
fdae Dan 4// ED a4H.4L y.C/Z SEE fQU/fMEN7~ Z 7~AM 45
4 NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03-73-118
, UWfFrankI!n Reser.rth Center FRC Prefect No. C" 57 PnG9 A c%n a The rr.nr.n recavi. FRC Assignrnent No.13 3a
- nh .nd Rx. Ser N4.. Pa.19103 (214 43- A FRC Task No. 4M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALJF1 CATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. dZ.
. LICENSEE RESICNS2 % !GC SER Qualified 7 Qualification Assess =ent On-Coing .
x _ To be Replaced by'a Q2alified C =ponent [l4] 1 4
.4 "
- 2 NOT!$ USED IN RI?!!!CN 4 30:s 1 ~ Test's'picimens in Referenc'es 25 and 25 were A$CO:.ve del.
Bo.'s 8300 364F and 83C3 361YF. -
- ve NOTE 2 Cualifiestion assessment ongoing.
ACTE 3 Equipment was tested successfully to a higher radiatier
-dose than that derived by engineering analysis.
3C73 4 Insulation qualification per 3eferences 46 or 47 as
, applicabler assassment o.; going.
'3 .
; BCTE 5 All metallic ecmponents; r.ot subject to ther=al or radiatica fagradation at the specified levels. ,
80f3 6 1 Equipment will be replaced if qualificatica cannot be t substantiated.
~
s 3C 3 7 ' Further equip =ent identification needed to assure applicability of tast report. 18C:3 8 The 510 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to r - pressure changest a pressure qualificatica test is not j .i censidered necessary (RM.7-Rpt 12710, Revisica p). - ( l t - l
- -,_2- NRC Contraet No. NRC-03 79-118 d Frankhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pags A Divs on of The Freu.n Irsnrue FRC Assignment No.13- Ia M:5 **d R*ca Str'c$. P5aa.. Pa.19:01:215) 44s.Inoo FRC Task No. IlOb EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W .
~
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 48 POSITION SWITCH LOCATED IN THE REACTOR BUILDING, ELEV. 237'0" MICR0 SWITCH MODEL llLS1 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 48 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 25 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TORUS VACUUM RELIEF VALVE POSITION INDICATION (POS 68-08 . I THROUGH -10) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): E-ll THROUGH E-13 [33] r% : .-~ - 2.; CIA -. -?
- .k TJ ... -
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:
~
(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) QT, RT, P,H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, i Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: . Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item . la Su:mnary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, L , M --
~
System Consideration Review '. Ib, h, ,w, ,e, .;-
- Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, .
Sg, Sh, Si, f(
- Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ?:, Eb Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, L, 7< ,
6 a
NRC Contr ct No. NRC-03 7J-118 Q'.sdJ Frank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Div:s.on of The Funkt n Instituie FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 Imo FRC Task No. 446 EQUlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 552. SUM. MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLi* CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 The Licensee (has/ha; r. t) provided a response to the' SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or wil1 function when exposed to the applicable DBE
- environmental service conditions.
The Licensee has presented information which shows th_ere are in outstanding qualification deficiencies.
/ The Licensee (has/'2r -t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
X Justification for interim operation (has/'2: r.c t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment -* Equipment modification - Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment , Qualification testing of equipment in progress
.,g_, Other (AsoL AcenfNr
- OuAL. CANN07 M fuM7MfMTFh )
~
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item ( that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. i
.. 1 The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the' proposed
! corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the cor rective action
.)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification l and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW f - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency ( . Q Modification III.a Exempt . II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available . 1 I
'3 4.~
Udu Frank!!n Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Duon or The rian'.1.n tmmute FRC Assignment No.13 2-
.Sh and Race Streets. Pbda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 lord ' FRC Task No. WG EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. grp 9
J
- J EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATICN: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qaalification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X
- 3 Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) i Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation .
Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Pesk Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate. Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied - 1 Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
. Test Duration Margin 'l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
~l I.a L;uipment Qualified .
I.b . I'quipment Qualification Pending Modification X ' II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life _ or Replacement Schedule Justified
.f III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification
?
III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
~, .
ese t
- O L
. q, .~ .
! A NRC Gentract No. NRCGT3-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page 000U Franklin Research Center A cumon el The Franidin Ins: ure FRC Assicnment No.13 3a Sh and Race Soests. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-Imo FRC Task No. 466 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. # LICE SEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER f Y_ Qualified (14] Qualification Assessment On-Coing
- To be Replaced by a Qualified Component Rev. Date: Acril 2, 1982 Mine Mile Point Unit 1 _ _ _ _ .
Corponent Revies Sumary keet _,- Equipment: Pressure suocression criam:er - reactor building vacsum breaker position switch (Pos 68-03,63-09,63-10)- Manufacturer: Mamco , Model C2a00I Safety Function: Vacuum breaker position tridication Quellfication Discrepancy: Lack of documented qualification cancerning - time / temperature aging Justification for Continued Oceratton: De pressure suppression c amer reactor build'ig vacuum treakers are normally closed during reactor gewer coeratins and are provided for vacup relief between the sussression chamer and at iosonere. De position swite ;rovides valve position indications only and has no control or safety related function. The vacuva trea4ers are trisced by ether of two vacuum seitches weich se-se pressure in the pressure suporession chamer relative to a tmesonere. The vacuum brtances are air ope *ates and f ail coen on loss of motive scwer or control signals to ensure * :tainment integrity. Sack up
- isolation is provided by a self-actuating Cheik valve.
Althougn time teNerature analysis Currently indicates limited qualifications based on conservative arnbient teneratares, it is unlikely the switch would fall. Yalve PCsition is Continually displayed in the Control room and provides a means to monitor $ ditch c9eracility for age related f ailures. Based on the above. c:ntinued coeration is justified until the pesitica snitch is cualif fed or replaced with a coewented cualified position switch. 4 em O e O 1
.I' 4WMFrankan Re:, catch Center NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-198 FRC Project No. CS257 .. Page A CW d N Puaw immu FRC Astignment No.13- 3h 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (2M) 34-1000 FRC Task No. _4folo -
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6E .
' l !
LICE 1SEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued) NOT!S USED IN MrJ!s:CN 4 {33] w;3 1 Test specimens in References 25 and 26 wer47.sec Model No.'s 8300 364F and 83C3 PSlYF. BOTE 2 Cualification assessment ongoing. 50T3 3 Zquipment was tested successfully to a higher rad!,. tion dose than that derived by engineering analysis. sors 4' Insulation qualifiestion pee References 46 or 47 as applicabler assesscent ongoing. NOTE 5 All metallic ccmponentsi not" subject to ther:nal or , radiation degradation at the speci!!ed levels. Nof3 6 X Equip =ent will be replaced if qualification cannot be substantiated. NO;3 7 Further equipment identification needed to assure applicamility of test report. NOT3 8 The $10 CU Trip / Calibration System is insensitive to 8 pressure changes a pressure qualification test ts not considered necessary (RMT-Rpt 12M O , Revisien A).
?
W e e
- m b
=
4
A_ NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page UETranklin Research Center FRC Prelect No. CS257 A oimen of The Franktin instMe FRC Aseianment No.13 50 2:hh and Race Streets. FN4. Pa.19103 (215) 448 Icco FRC Task No. 466 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _46. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines 1 ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II _. NRC REQUIRDiENTS DEFICIENCY
+ WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II)
- SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) -
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I !
*Equipuent Type BS/7/CM ! L /M / 7* N/ 7"C W
. !S W /7~c M ! !
. Manufacturer's Name !Mxpo Jwit'cf. s+1/CAC SW/7cf !
' (5.2.2/-/-) ! ! !
Model Number ( 5. 2. 2/-/-) ! ffLS1 ! 11L.SL, Ls4.2/2-1D ! Nors 2./ Serial Nu=ber ! for~ 17;trED ! #0/* S7"A 7"AD ! Features / Mounting 1887: #7'4T#O ! # # 7" S 7"d 7"# O ! g5.2.6/-/-) -211" - ! -_ 1 , Connections / Interfaces
- No7*S7x7BD Md7".Z M 7*A O (5.2.6/-/-) ! ! !,
1 1 1 Location / Elevation
! #.B.[A J7'0 ! !
Equipment 1D No. !/VSCJ-09,-Of, ! Pol 6 != 0 P,- 0 9, -/ 0 ~!
!_fa 1 QUALIFICATICN REPORT ! !
(8.0/5.0/5.0) 1 Report ID Number ! PSA A AS- ! /1G/-M102-cdj GoJA /25) ! Ud7*41 1 I /2 1 Report Date
' p/////f gjg ,
g Isa. sed by ! ! !
~
! ! NMPc/A'MP=/ !
Prepared for ! . ! ! Referenced Reports ! ! V4A/Suf ! Qualification Method ! ,7,g.f7 g, gg4y.r/r ! (5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) ! ! - QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM ! ! !
! I
- Functional Test Description ! fVd7 .rg,vi-E4 !
( 5. 2. 5/2. 2. 9/ 2. 2. 9) 1 Operating Conditions ! ! j2g p,ogjg. yj c gy, !1 A7"E i (-/ 2. 2.10/ 2. 2.10 ) ! f ogg g ,g Ioad/ Cycles / voltage / ! ! ! Current /Freq. ! ! ! , L_
1' NRC Contreet No. NRCM3-73-118 4} MlFranklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 pag 2 A DMsion of Th Fun'.bn ine ute FPC Assignrnent No.13 20th and Rue Sneers. PMa.. Pa. 19103 12153 448-1000 5b FRC Task No. 4 46
?
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIP. CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26-I .
~~
NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTICN REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATICN NOTE NO.) Acceptsnce Criteria ! ! fyor f7gggg 1 ( 5. 2. 5/ 2. 2.1/ 2. 2.1) ! ! ! Accuracy (5. 2. 5/-/-)
. 'E# # F##O
; 1 ! !
Number of Specimens : f, ! !l -- 1 , Test Instruments Calibrated ! ! <Vd 7 ,r 74 TES ! Safety Fu:1ction (Active / ! p ,4 f S/ V S ! ! 7~ Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3) 1 ! ! Test Duration ( 5. 2.1/-/-) 1 - ! # ## # ## "A # ! ##7'4 2 Accident Duration (Envir. 1 ,v 1 //o u A ! ! Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-) ! ! ! Required Function Time
! f good ! !
Test Sequence (General) ! ! gog,yg g 77j/ ! # d r'E / ( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1) ! -
~
Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, ! ! ! Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-) ! ! !
- 1. Representative Sample ! ! !
; 2. Baseline Data ! ! !
- } 3. Performance Extremes ! ! !
i 4. Thermal Aging ! ! ! -
"' 5. Radiation Aging ! !
.2 6. Wear Aging ! ! !
- 7. Vibration / Seismic
; 8. DBE Exposure ! ! !
- 9. Post-DBE Exposure ! ! !
- 10. Inspection ! ! !
-l ! ! - !
Ag ing 1 1 1
~
(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) ! ! . Thermal Aging / Basis ! ! /,M #ENNI N d4E4 ! -
.a ! !- !
Material Aging ! ! ! . Evaluation (7.0/-/-) ! !#e7 BEMA 4NEC ! Materials Susceptible ! ! /3 u,v 4 'N # I ~ (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7. 0/-/-) ! ! !
- Radiation Aging, Type ! ! Nay p.S4j'O,4 msg '. ,
A B-
6~ I NRC Contract No. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page dbkranklin Research Center FRC Assignment No.13 A Diwden of Use Franun Inst:rute 5C
- 20th and Pace Streets. Thca.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4410M FRC Task No. 44G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _fA ..
DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) 1 1 1
! /.4 Ed6 g /VJT4 3 Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) !/.1Sc4 Radiation Aging, Dose Rate ! #ar.snerSC! #s7 / sed #veeN#4 1}}