ML20024D134
| ML20024D134 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/1983 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Sternberg D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, ANPP-27302-BSK, DER-83-13, NUDOCS 8308030190 | |
| Download: ML20024D134 (4) | |
Text
-
^A[fffGO Arizona Public Service Company !.d3 Tgr Eh PO DOX 21666. PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85036 HlI2: 5-July 14, 1983
?
ANPP-27302-BSK/RQ %n:,
5$- S 22 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V Creekside Oaks Office Park 1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. D. M. Sternberg, Chie f Reactor Projects Branch 1
Subject:
Final Report - DER 83-13 A 50.55(e) Reportable Condition Relating to APS Crews Inadvertently Did Work Violating Requirements On Tagged-Out Cable Terminations.
File: 83-019-026; D.4.33.2 Re ferenc e: A) Telephone Conversation between A. D'Angelo and R. Tucker on March 11, 1983 B) ANPP-23427, dated April 5,1933 (Interim Report)
C) ANPP-24076, dated June 15, 1983 (Time Extension)
Dear Sir:
Attached is our final written report of the deficiency referenced above, which has been determined to be Not Reportable under the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e).
Very truly you f
\\
R
^}
w c
- cut, ntLU E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
APS Vice President,
- Nuclear Projects Mana~gement ANPP Project Director EEVB/RQT:ru r
Enclosure cc:
See Page 2 f
r308030190 830714 ~~' '
I PDR ADOCK 05000528 S
,\\
T[y2 lJ
t U. S. Nuclear' Regulatory Commission Page 2 cc: Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.' S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 T. G. Woods, Jr.
G. C. Andognini J.~A. Roedel D. B. Fasnacht A. C. Rogers B. S. Kaplan
.W. E. Ide J. Vorecs J. R. Bynum P. P. Klute/D. D. Green A. C. Gehr W. J. Stubblefield W. C. Bingham R. L. Patterson R. W. Welcher R. M. Grant D. R. Hawkinson L. E. Vorderbrueggen G. A. Fiore11i S. R. Frost-Records Center Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100 circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1500 Atlanta, Georgia' 30339 w.
Y
' ? g' i.
I
{
,s
. - ~.
~.
FINAL REPORT - DER 83-13 DEFICIENCY EVALUATION 50.55(e)
~ ARIZONA PUBLIC. SERVICE COMPANY.(APS)
- PVNGS UNIT 1~
I.
Description of Condition A jurisdictional boundary condition was identified wherein APS Maintenance / Operations used Test Exception Reports (TER's) and APS Work Implementation Documents (work orders) to complete major work items typically completed-by Construction via Startup.Turnback Work
_ Orders.,The TER's and APS work orders were isaued by Startup to have incomplete construction items finished by APS Maintenance-
~
rather than turn.the subsystems back to Construction. This condition is not a jurisdictional boundary-problem per se since no
. regulations exist restricting APS Maintenance from performing the
+
completion of the major work items. However, APS Maintenance did not use-the applicable Bechtel Construction Work Plan Procedure / Quality Control Intructions (WPP/QC1's), which' provide instructions for the proper documentation of completed work to i
satisfy as-built tracking requirements, because the use of Bechtel I
Construction Work Procedures had not been implemented ~by APS Maintenance into their' system.
4 APS Quality Assurance Stop Work Notice No. S-83-006 was issued to stop all work of this type. Per.the Stop Work Notice, tha.
specified corrective action ~ requires adequate procedures, documentation and training to assure that thel work performed by APS r
Maintenance would be performed in accordance with establishad site construction procedures and installation specifications. This
. Deficiency; Evaluation Report was initiated to evaluate whether any
~
of'the work completed would impair the' function of any safety related systems or equipment and to specify any recessary corrective action.
The referenced Stop Work Notice and subsequently issued Corrective Action Request (APS CAR 0-83-010N) identified the-following required corrective actions:
1.
Recall all APS work orders frra 1:( rield that were generated to ' perform construction c %?) ti.'
items.
j 2.
Perform a documented revi+w ot %.! work orders and TER's that have.been written to complete construction open items to ensure
.that adequate. construction documentation (per-applicable WPP/QCI's);has been supplied to BPC Construction for retention on DDCC.as required..
3.
Conduct training for personnel responsible for implementing 1
procedures, WPP/QCI's and project construction specifications.
l'
(.
Final Report DER 83-13 Page 2 II.
. Analysis'of Safety Implications As documented by the referenced Corrective Action-Request, ~ all. of the work previously completed by Maintenance was reinspected by
) qualified personnel for adequacy. of installation and all were found -
to be acceptable. The WPP/QCI's' referred'to above provide instructions related to proper completion of documentation associated with the work performed. The only documentation omissions found were associated with proper completion of EE-580 Termination' Cards; however, these' omissions have no direct bearing on the safe operation of the plant. Thus, if left uncorrected, this condition would not adversely affect the safety of operations of the plant during the lifetime of the plant and is therefore not t
reportable under the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e)
III. Corrective Action 1.
To preclude recurrence, training on Bechtel,WPP/QCI use and the APS Work Control Procedure 30AC-9ZZ01 (which also provides instructions for proper documentation of completed work) has been held by APS Maintenance / Operations and training will continue as committed by APS CAR 0-83-010N response.1 The Work Control Procedure has been revised to reference applicable Bechtel WPP/QCI's.
2.
All Electrical, instrument.and controls (I & C) and mechanical' work ' orders in the-field have been reviewed as required.
Documentation of this review is being retained by APS.
3.
Of the completed I & C and mechanical work orders.that were received, none were found that required completion documentation. Completed electrical work orders (123' total) that have been reviewed have had all the necessary
-documentation completed.
4.
The referenced Stop Work Notice and Corrective Action Request have been completed and accepted by APS Quality Assurance.
j --
___m